Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

The Nearby Evolved Stars Survey (NESS) V: properties of volume-limited samples of Galactic evolved stars

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two volume-complete samples of evolved stars near the Sun show that Gaia's bright-giant temperatures run hot, dust production switches on sharply at the red-giant-branch tip, and the local AGB/RSG population is mostly homogeneous.

desk verdict A useful catalogue and a real Gaia temperature bias result, but the completeness claim rests on an untested assumption about Gaia-missing obscured AGB stars, and the abstract fights the body twice. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.10542 v1 pith:6HMFNNO4 submitted 2025-06-12 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

I. McDonald , S. Srinivasan , P. Scicluna , O.C. Jones , A.A. Zijlstra , S.H.J. Wallström , T. Danilovich , J.H. He
show 18 more authors
J.P. Marshall J.Th. van Loon R. Wesson F. Kemper A. Trejo-Cruz J. Greaves T. Dharmawardena J. Cami H. Kim K.E. Kraemer C.J.R. Clark H. Shinnaga C. Haswell H. Imai J.G.A. Wouterloot A.J. Pérez Vidal G. Rau the NESS collaboration
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords surveyscataloguesstars:AGBandpost-AGBmass-losswindsoutflowsGaiaDR3luminosityfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs two volume-limited censuses of evolved stars near the Sun and compares them: the 852-source NESS survey and a newly assembled sample of 507 stars within 300 pc that satisfy the evolved-star box ($L$ between 700 and 200,000 $L_\odot$, effective temperature below 5000 K). It argues that after re-deriving distances from Gaia DR3 parallaxes and removing contaminants, the NESS survey contains 649 genuinely evolved stars, and that the two samples together replace cherry-picked studies with a statistical view of the local population. The main physical results are that the local evolved-star distribution is largely homogeneous within 300 pc, matching a 300-pc disc scale height, that dust production jumps on near the red-giant-branch tip, that most dust-producing carbon stars lie close to the Galactic plane, and that Gaia's spectroscopic temperatures for bright giants are too warm by a median of roughly 334 K. A curious reader should care because the paper offers a statistical baseline for stellar mass-loss and chemical-enrichment models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the evolved-star box on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram ($700 \le L/L_{\odot} \le 200{,}000$ and $T_{\rm eff}<5000$ K), which defines both samples. The analysis then rests on a common spectral-energy-distribution pipeline that fits stellar-atmosphere models, blackbodies, or trapezoidal SED integrals to merged photometry; on parallax-based distances (prioritising Gaia DR3 geometric distances) for the restricted dataset; and on period-luminosity and bolometric-luminosity distance estimates for stars without parallaxes. The bolometric-luminosity method is the critical device for the upper NESS tiers: it assigns a median luminosity, revised from the LMC value near 6200 $L_\odot$ to 5363 $L_\odot$ from the sample itself, and converts observed flux into distance, which then drives dust-production rates, tier membership, and 3D positions. A goodness-of-fit statistic based on the median ratio of model-to-observed flux mismatch to flux uncertainty decides whether a star's parameters come from the model fit or from a blackbody fit, a choice that matters most for dust-enshrouded stars.

What would settle it

Measure VLBI maser parallaxes, or another geometric distance, for the dust-enshrouded NESS stars that currently have only bolometric-luminosity distances, then recompute their luminosities, dust-production rates, and tier memberships; if the tier reassignments alter the number of extreme dust producers by more than the quoted uncertainties, the revised completeness statistics and the spatial concentration of extreme dusty stars do not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the 300 pc sample is a volume-complete census: from 1880 candidate evolved stars drawn from Gaia DR3, Hipparcos and supplementary lists, 507 meet the luminosity and temperature criteria, and 178 of these also appear in NESS. On the NESS side, the paper shows that 649 of the 781 non-rejected sources with usable distances satisfy the same evolved-star criteria on parallax-based distances, and it uses the 300 pc sample to measure the completeness of the two lowest NESS tiers. It further claims that the luminosity function of local evolved stars reproduces the known solar-neighbourhood star-formation history except for a model overprediction of AGB stars around 500 Myr old, that the dusty fraction of stars rises from about 60 per cent at the red-giant-branch tip to about 74 per cent one bolometric magnitude above it, and that the spatial distribution follows a 300-pc scale height with a slight excess toward the Galactic centre. It also claims that Gaia GSP-Phot effective temperatures of bright giant stars are systematically higher than SED-derived photometric temperatures by a median of about 334 K, with far more scatter than expected.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that stars in the upper NESS tiers without parallaxes can be placed using a single median luminosity of 5363 solar luminosities, and the paper itself notes this method performs badly for both low-luminosity AGB stars and luminous red supergiants; any error in that assumed luminosity propagates into revised tier counts, dust-production rates, and the claimed spatial distribution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 300 pc sample gives a benchmark list of 507 evolved stars that future Gaia releases, spectroscopic surveys, and variability searches can test for completeness.
  • NESS Tiers 0 and 1 are nearly but not perfectly complete: the comparison identifies five candidate missing stars per tier, so low-mass-loss-rate samples should allow for a few per cent incompleteness.
  • Because the dusty fraction jumps near the red-giant-branch tip, models of dust-driven winds should produce a sharp onset of dust production rather than a gradual luminosity-dependent rise.
  • Carbon stars are concentrated toward the Galactic plane and peak near 8300 $L_\odot$, so carbon-star samples should be treated as tracers of the younger, metal-rich thin disc rather than the halo.
  • Gaia GSP-Phot temperatures of bright cool giants carry a median offset near 334 K, so temperature-selected cool-star samples built on those values need recalibration before deriving luminosities or masses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Gaia's bright-giant temperature offset is as uniform as the paper suggests, Gaia-based colour and temperature cuts will systematically exclude the coolest, most dust-enshrouded AGB stars; a magnitude- and colour-dependent correction could be derived from the 300 pc sample and applied to wider catalogues.
  • The bolometric-luminosity distance method could be stress-tested by applying it to the parallax-known 300 pc stars and checking the bias curve; a mismatch there would also call into question median-luminosity distances used for AGB stars in other galaxies.
  • The overprediction of AGB stars near 500 Myr isolates a narrow stellar-mass range, so it may be a sharper calibration target for mass-loss and hot-bottom-burning prescriptions than the full luminosity function.
  • The 3D concentration of extreme dusty stars toward the Galactic centre and the disc-concentrated carbon-star assignment rest on the least secure distances; proper-motion or chemical-abundance data for the same stars would provide an independent check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents a meta-analysis of two volume-limited samples of evolved stars: the 852-source NESS survey and a newly constructed 300 pc comparison sample drawn from Gaia DR3, Hipparcos, and a small number of manually added obscured sources. After cross-matching, SED fitting with PySSED, and rejection of contaminants, the paper reports 507 stars in the 300 pc sample meeting the adopted evolved-star criteria (700 < L < 200,000 L_sun, T_eff < 5000 K), and 649 NESS stars satisfying the same criteria with parallax-based distances. The authors re-derive distances via parallax, period-luminosity, and bolometric-luminosity methods; reassess NESS tier membership and completeness; compare photometric and spectroscopic temperatures; construct luminosity functions; and analyze the 3D spatial distribution, including the carbon-star fraction. The paper provides machine-readable tables, input files, and code for reproducibility.

Significance. If the 507-star and 649-star counts withstand scrutiny, this is the most complete volume-limited evolved-star census within 300 pc to date and a valuable recalibration of NESS tier completeness. The paper's strengths include the reproducible PySSED pipeline, the honest and detailed discussion of systematic uncertainties, and the concrete demonstration that Gaia GSP-Phot temperatures of bright giants are systematically high. The catalog itself, the revised distance estimates, and the rejection lists will be useful community resources. However, the volume-completeness claim and the conclusions on the spatial distribution of dusty stars are more fragile than the abstract suggests, because the completeness check is not independent and several load-bearing decisions lack quantitative sensitivity analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.3.1 and §A2.3] The 300 pc sample is described as volume-complete, but the only completeness check is the statement in §5.3.1 that all but one restricted-dataset NESS source with a parallax distance <300 pc has a counterpart in the 300 pc sample. This is not an independent test: NESS itself was constructed from IRAS and evolved-star priors, so it cannot reveal a population of optically faint, saturated, or astrometrically perturbed AGB stars that Gaia misses. The paper acknowledges that IRC+10216 is decomposed into two Gaia sources without a parallax, and CW Leo and IK Tau are manually added under the assertion in §A2.3 that they are 'the only sufficiently obscured sources within 300 pc'. That assertion is load-bearing for the 507-star count, the Tier 0/1 completeness fractions in Table 3, and the luminosity functions in Section 6.2. An independent infrared-selected census (e.g., AllWISE/IRAS colour cuts) or a quantitative upper limit on missed obscured sources should be provided; otherwise the volume-complete claim should be softened.
  2. [§3.5] The paper explicitly decides not to assign errors to fitted temperatures and luminosities, citing 'unknown unknowns'. While the reasoning is transparent, the consequence is that all central numbers — 507, 649, the tier counts in Table 3, and the dusty-star fractions in Table 7 — are point estimates without propagated uncertainty. This is especially important because §3.4.1 estimates that roughly 50 stars may lie on the wrong side of the 300 pc boundary, and the adopted selection boundaries in L and T_eff also have edge cases. A sensitivity analysis that moves borderline stars across the distance, temperature, or luminosity thresholds (or varies the assumed parallax zero-point correction) is needed to support the claimed completeness statistics.
  3. [§5.2 and Eq. (1)] The construction of the 649-star criteria-matching sample removes 19 sub-700 L_sun and 17 super-200,000 L_sun sources, justified by the statement that one or more measured properties are 'considered to be in error'. The KGOF statistic in Eq. (1) and the five adoption criteria are ad hoc thresholds, and no validation of these thresholds against known objects or a robustness test is provided. Because these 36 removals directly determine the denominator for the completeness fractions and the shape of the luminosity functions, the paper should show that the conclusions are insensitive to plausible variations in the KGOF thresholds or to alternative model/blackbody selection rules.
  4. [§3.4.4, §5.2, and §6.3.2] The bolometric-luminosity distance method in the unrestricted dataset is based on a median luminosity (originally the LMC median of 6200 L_sun, revised to 5363 L_sun computed from the sample itself), and the text states that this method 'performs badly on stars both less-luminous AGB and luminous RSG stars'. These distances feed into the revised tiering (Table 3) and into the 3D spatial analysis and carbon-star distribution discussed in Section 6.3.2, where the unrestricted dataset is used unless otherwise stated. A systematic error in the assumed median luminosity therefore propagates into the claimed scale height of the NESS tiers and the conclusion that most carbon stars belong to the thin disc. The paper should quantify how much the 3D distribution and C/M ratio change if the LMC median or the 16th/84th percentile luminosities are used instead.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§6.2.1] The removal of the 500 Myr bin from the Alzate et al. (2021) SFH is an ad hoc modification, and the text acknowledges an alternative model-related explanation. The figure and text should make clear that this is a test variation, not a literature-derived SFH.
  2. [§6.2.5] The carbon-star comparison quotes a 'carbon:oxygen stars between 500 and 10 000 L_sun' ratio, but the sample selection criterion is L > 700 L_sun; the lower bound should be made consistent and the reason for the 500 L_sun value clarified.
  3. [§5.2, Eq. (1)] The KGOF statistic should explicitly state that the median is evaluated across the photometric bands used in the SED fit, and the filter set for the blackbody versus model fits should be listed in the text or in Table B1.
  4. [Table B2] The priority column contains duplicate values (e.g., two entries with priority 9), but the caption states that smaller numbers indicate preferential use; please clarify how ties are broken.
  5. [Figure 5] In the middle panel, the filled and hollow symbols for Gaia temperatures are hard to distinguish at the printed size; larger symbols or separate panels would aid readability.
  6. [Abstract and typesetting] The provided text contains LaTeX artifacts (e.g., '/u1D450...' sequences) in the abstract and throughout; the published version should be checked carefully, though this may be a rendering issue rather than a scientific one.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity in two secondary loops: bolometric-luminosity distances embed the sample's own median luminosity, and the 300 pc sample's completeness for obscured stars is assumed via NESS before NESS is scored against that sample; the central 507/649 claims still rest on Gaia parallaxes.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.4.5, with the median luminosity derived in Section 5.2 and used in the revised tiering (Table 3, Appendix C3, Figures 4 and C7).]
    "Some NESS stars lack accurate parallax distances (statistics in Figure 1). Consequently, we add the other literature sources of parallaxes, and kinematic and other distance measures (full list in Table B2). Finally, we compute two new distance estimates based on period–luminosity distances and bolometric-luminosity distances (see below). We refer to this as the “unrestricted dataset”, which we use in the revision of the NESS tiers and discussion, unless otherwise stated."

    Section 5.2 derives a median luminosity of 5396 Lsun from stars with parallax-based distances and then revises the luminosity-based distances from this median. A bolometric-luminosity distance is set by d proportional to sqrt(L0/F), so recomputing the luminosity from that distance and the same flux returns L = L0 for every such star; the derived luminosity equals the assumed sample median by construction. These distances are then used in the unrestricted dataset to revise NESS tiers and dust-production rates, so any tier membership or luminosity claim for those parallax-less stars reproduces the assumed median rather than an independent measurement.

  2. self citation load bearing [Appendix A2.3, with the circular validation in Section 5.3.1.]
    "To this list, we add the carbon star CW Leo (IRC +10216; 95 ± 15 pc; Sozzetti et al. 2017) and the OH/IR star IK Tau (260 pc; Gaia DR3), which appear in Gaia but are too obscured to meet the G < 10 mag target. We anticipate that these are the only sufficiently obscured sources within 300 pc, otherwise they would have been identified by NESS and other surveys."

    The 300 pc sample is used to measure NESS completeness, but its own completeness for obscured stars is asserted by invoking NESS: 'We anticipate that these are the only sufficiently obscured sources within 300 pc, otherwise they would have been identified by NESS and other surveys.' Section 5.3.1 then validates the 300 pc sample by checking that NESS sources appear in it: 'All but one of the sources in the restricted NESS dataset with fitted distances of <300 pc has a counterpart in the 300 pc sample.' Since Gaia itself is incomplete for heavily obscured stars (IRC+10216 is decomposed into two sources with no parallax, Section 3.4), a check against NESS cannot reveal sources both surveys miss.

full rationale

Most of the paper is self-contained and independently grounded: the 649-star NESS criteria-matching sample is restricted to parallax-based distances (Section 3.4.5), the Gaia temperature discrepancy is compared against independent spectroscopic catalogues, and the star-formation-history comparison uses external PARSEC models and the Alzate et al. (2021) SFH. The two flagged circularities are partial and secondary. First, the bolometric-luminosity distance revision adopts the sample's own median luminosity, so it cannot independently constrain the luminosities or tier membership of parallax-less stars; the authors themselves exclude these distances from the central criteria-matching sample 'to avoid distance estimation becoming an iterative problem,' but they do use them for the revised tiering and unrestricted dataset. Second, the 300 pc sample's completeness for heavily obscured stars is argued from NESS before that same sample is used to measure NESS completeness; this affects the exact value of the 507-star census and the completeness fractions, although the Gaia/Hipparcos colour–magnitude selection and the manual addition of CW Leo and IK Tau provide substantial independent content. No equation in the paper equates the central 507/649 counts or the Gaia temperature offset to fitted inputs, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The score of 4 reflects partial circularity in these secondary loops while the headline claims retain independent support.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on several assumptions inherited from the literature and on a few numbers fitted or chosen in this paper, most notably the median luminosity used for distance estimation and the removal of the 500 Myr star-formation bin. Distances remain the primary limitation, per the paper's own assessment.

free parameters (3)
  • Median luminosity for bolometric-luminosity distances = 6200 L_sun originally; revised to 5363 L_sun in this paper
    Used to convert SED-integrated flux into distance for NESS sources lacking parallaxes or periods; the revised value is the median of the sample's own parallax-based luminosities, introducing a sample-dependent scale.
  • Removed SFH bin at 500 Myr = bin contribution set to zero
    The modified Alzate et al. (2021) star-formation history removes the 500 Myr population to better reproduce the observed 300 pc luminosity function; this is a fitting adjustment, not an independent prediction.
  • KGOF selection thresholds = KGOF_bb/KGOF_model < 0.5 (or <1 with additional criteria)
    Hand-chosen criteria in Section 5.2 that decide whether a blackbody or stellar-atmosphere model fit is adopted for each star; results depend on this choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The LMC luminosity function of Riebel et al. (2012) is representative of Galactic evolved-star luminosities for distance estimation
    Used in Section 3.4.4 to construct bolometric-luminosity distances for NESS stars; the paper notes the method performs badly for faint AGB and luminous RSG stars.
  • domain assumption The Riebel et al. (2010) Ks-band period-luminosity relation is valid for Galactic AGB stars, which are assumed to pulsate in the fundamental mode
    Section 3.4.3 uses this relation to derive distances; acknowledged breakdown for the most obscured stars and first-overtone pulsators.
  • domain assumption BT-Settl stellar atmosphere models adequately represent the SEDs of evolved stars with little dust, and blackbody fits represent heavily dust-enshrouded stars
    Section 3.3 and Appendix C1; the KGOF criterion arbitrates between the two, but both are approximations.
  • domain assumption The 300 pc sample constructed from Gaia DR3 and Hipparcos colour/magnitude/parallax cuts is volume-complete to within a few per cent
    Section 3.2 and 3.4.1 estimate ~3 per cent of stars may be assigned to the wrong side of the 300 pc boundary.
  • domain assumption The Vergely et al. (2022) 3D extinction map correctly dereddens photometry; circumstellar extinction is ignored
    Section 3.3; no attempt to model circumstellar reddening, which affects dusty AGB stars.
  • domain assumption Bailer-Jones et al. (2021) geometric distances with Lindegren et al. (2021) zero-point corrections are appropriate for these stars
    Section 3.4.2; the zero-point correction is poorly defined for red and bright stars.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Nearby Evolved Stars Survey (NESS) V: properties of volume-limited samples of Galactic evolved stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6HMFNNO4

@misc{pith2026250610542,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Nearby Evolved Stars Survey (NESS) V: properties of volume-limited samples of Galactic evolved stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6HMFNNO4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.10542}
}
read the original abstract

We provide a meta-study of the statistical and individual properties of two volume-complete sets of evolved stars in the Solar Neighbourhood: (1) 852 stars from the Nearby Evolved Stars Survey (NESS), and (2) a partially overlapping set of 507 evolved stars within 300 pc. We also investigate distance determinations to these stars, their luminosity functions and their spatial distribution. Gaia APSIS GSP-Phot AENEAS temperatures of bright giant stars often appear to be underestimated. Existing literature on AGB stars under-samples both the most and least extreme nearby dust-producing stars. We reproduce the literature star-formation history of the solar neighbourhood, though stellar-evolution models over-predict the number of AGB stars of ages around 500 Myr. The distribution of AGB stars broadly matches the known 300 pc scale height of the Galactic disc and shows concentration in the direction of the Galactic centre. Most dust-producing carbon stars belong to the Galactic thick-disc population.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.10542 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Venn diagram of the NESS and 300 pc datasets, separated by tier, identifying stars rejected because they are (∗) not evolved stars, (∗∗) highly evolved stars, or (∗∗∗)sources with unclear classifications, but which are probably not evolved stars. The full NESS dataset of 781 evolved stars is subdivided into 685 stars with valid distances in the “restricted dataset” (Section 3.3), of which 649 stars fit within our ev… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the revised distances resulting from a combination of luminosity-, period–luminosity- and parallax-based distances. 10 100 1000 10000 100 1000 New distance (pc) Scicluna et al. (2022) input distance (pc) Tier 4 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. H–R diagrams of our samples. Upper panel: sources within 300 pc; lower panel: the NESS sample combined from stellar-model and blackbody fits. Gaia DR3 sources within 300 pc of the Sun (see Section 3.2) are shown as solid red points; NESS sources within this sample are shown in blue/purple open symbols as indicated on the plots. Solar-metallicity Padova isochrones at different ages are shown: sources to the right of … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Revised tiering from distance and DPR changes. Filled boxes show tier boundaries. Note that the boundary for tier 0 is a luminosity-based boundary, rather than a ¤ boundary, resulting in some objects with negligi￾ble mass loss being removed that are otherwise within th…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between photometric temperatures from this work’s SED fitting and spectroscopic temperatures from the literature. As in previ￾ous plots, points show the 300 pc sample and NESS tiers. However, in this plot, filled points show stellar-atmosphere model fits hav…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Luminosity function of the 300 pc sample. A Gaussian kernel of width 0.05 dex was used to smooth the data. Also shown are luminosity functions from the parsec stellar evolution models, assuming different SFHs (see text). cooler blackbodies of 1000∼2500 K due to the dus…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: An approximation of the fraction of stellar luminosity reprocessed by circumstellar dust, IR. Colours and point shapes are as in previous plots. The pink symbols show sampled giant stars within 300 pc that did not meet the temperature and luminosity criteria for inclus…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Luminosity functions of the 300 pc sample, NESS stars within 300 pc, the entire NESS sample and the overlap between the DEATHSTAR and NESS surveys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Luminosity functions for C-rich and O-rich stars in the NESS criteria-matching sample and the LMC sample of Riebel et al. (2012). “Ex￾treme” stars in the LMC, as defined byRiebel et al. (2012), have been merged into the C-rich sample. The absolute source densities for…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Histograms, showing the luminosity density functions of the different NESS tiers (see Section 6.2.4 for details). The top panel shows the NESS survey itself, broken down by tier. The corresponding luminosity functions for the Riebel et al. (2012) LMC sample and the 300…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left panel: Galactic XYZ co-ordinates of sources in the NESS criteria-meeting sample. The colours and point shapes represent different tiers, as in previous plots. Green points show other (non-rejected) NESS objects with parameters inconsistent with AGB/RSG stars (eff…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Density plots showing number of stars per degree in Galactic longitude (top panel) and Galactic latitude (middle panel, a division by cos( ) is applied to account for area differences). A Gaussian smoothing factor of 10◦ has been applied to each plot, with 1 errors ap…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Evolution of space density of evolved stars versus (left) distance from the Sun and (right) distance from the Galactic Plane. Coloured bands show the 1 confidence intervals. The top panels show the 300 pc sample; the middle panels include NESS Tiers 1, 2 and 3 (Tiers …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JWST NIRCam and MIRI Reveal the Dust-Producing AGB Population of NGC 6822

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    JWST photometry of NGC 6822 yields 1226 evolved stars returning 5.6e-7 Msun/yr of dust (60% oxygen-rich AGB, 35% carbon-rich) despite low metallicity, plus colour-based DPR estimators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

168 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..182..543A 182, 543

    Abazajian K. N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..182..543A 182, 543

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [2]

    Abbott T. M. C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..255...20A 255, 20

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac00b3 2021

  3. [3]

    V., Mickaelian A

    Abrahamyan H. V., Mickaelian A. M., Knyazyan A. V., 2015, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2014.12.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&C....10...99A 10, 99

    doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2014.12.002 2015

  4. [4]

    M., Gim \'e nez A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220095 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...548A..79A 548, A79

    Alfonso-Garz \'o n J., Domingo A., Mas-Hesse J. M., Gim \'e nez A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220095 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...548A..79A 548, A79

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220095 2012

  5. [5]

    H., Schweitzer A., Alexander D

    Allard F., Guillot T., Ludwig H.-G., Hauschildt P. H., Schweitzer A., Alexander D. R., Ferguson J. W., 2003, in E. Mart \' n ed., IAU Symposium Vol. 211, Brown Dwarfs. p. 325

    2003

  6. [6]

    A., Bruzual G., D \' az-Gonz \'a lez D

    Alzate J. A., Bruzual G., D \' az-Gonz \'a lez D. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501..302A 501, 302

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3576 2021

  7. [7]

    M., Robinson S

    Ammons S. M., Robinson S. E., Strader J., Laughlin G., Fischer D., Wolf A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498490 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...638.1004A 638, 1004

    doi:10.1086/498490 2006

  8. [8]

    Andrae R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732516 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...616A...8A 616, A8

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732516 2018

Show all 168 references
  1. [9]

    Andriantsaralaza M., Ramstedt S., Vlemmings W. H. T., De Beck E., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243670 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A..74A 667, A74

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    Arentsen A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...627A.138A 627, A138

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bdb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...44A 247, 44

    Arnold R. A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bdb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...44A 247, 44

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Bailer-Jones C. A. L., Rybizki J., Fouesneau M., Demleitner M., Andrae R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..147B 161, 147

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Bianchi L., Shiao B., Thilker D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..230...24B 230, 24

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Bladh S., H \"o fner S., 2012, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219138 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A\

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    Bladh S., Liljegren S., H \"o fner S., Aringer B., Marigo P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935366 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...626A.100B 626, A100

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/2041-8205/711/2/L99 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...711L..99B 711, L99

    Boyer M. L., et al., 2010, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/2041-8205/711/2/L99 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...711L..99B 711, L99

    2010 doi

  9. [18]

    Bujarrabal V., Castro-Carrizo A., Alcolea J., Van Winckel H., S \'a nchez Contreras C., Santander-Garc \' a M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629317 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...597L...5B 597, L5

    2017 doi

  10. [19]

    Burggraaff O., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...617A..32B 617, A32

    2018 doi

  11. [20]

    W., 1893, Astronomy and Astro-Physics (formerly The Sidereal Messenger), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1893AstAp..12..913C 12, 913

    Campbell W. W., 1893, Astronomy and Astro-Physics (formerly The Sidereal Messenger), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1893AstAp..12..913C 12, 913

  12. [21]

    M., Kami \'n ski T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118683 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...542A..15C 542, A15

    Cerrigone L., Menten K. M., Kami \'n ski T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118683 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...542A..15C 542, A15

    2012 doi

  13. [22]

    C., et al., 2016, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161205560C p

    Chambers K. C., et al., 2016, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161205560C p. arXiv:1612.05560

    2016 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Chiavassa A., Freytag B., Schultheis M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833844 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...617L...1C 617, L1

    2018 doi

  15. [24]

    J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805...53C 805, 53

    Chong S.-N., Imai H., Diamond P. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805...53C 805, 53

    2015 doi

  16. [25]

    Cioni M. R. L., Girardi L., Marigo P., Habing H. J., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053933 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...448...77C 448, 77

    2006 doi

  17. [26]

    L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A..26C 674, A26

    Creevey O. L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A..26C 674, A26

    2023 doi

  18. [27]

    Csengeri T., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322434 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...565A..75C 565, A75

    2014 doi

  19. [28]

    M., et al., 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    2003

  20. [29]

    M., et al., 2013, Technical report, Explanatory Supplement to the AllWISE Data Release Products

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2013, Technical report, Explanatory Supplement to the AllWISE Data Release Products

    2013

  21. [30]

    Danilovich T., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526705 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  22. [31]

    R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa174 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493..468D 493, 468

    Davies B., Beasor E. R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa174 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493..468D 493, 468

    2020 doi

  23. [32]

    Decin L., et al., 2020, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.abb1229 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Sci...369.1497D 369, 1497

    2020 doi

  24. [33]

    E., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu394 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440.2036D 440, 2036

    Drew J. E., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu394 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440.2036D 440, 2036

    2014 doi

  25. [34]

    F., Richmond M

    Droege T. F., Richmond M. W., Sallman M. P., Creager R. P., 2006, @doi [PASP] 10.1086/510197 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PASP..118.1666D 118, 1666

    2006 doi

  26. [35]

    P., et al., 2003, Technical Report AFRL-VS-TR-2003-1589, The Midcourse Space Experiment Point Source Catalog, Version 2.3

    Egan M. P., et al., 2003, Technical Report AFRL-VS-TR-2003-1589, The Midcourse Space Experiment Point Source Catalog, Version 2.3 . Air Force Research Laboratory, @doi 10.21236/ADA418993

    2003 doi

  27. [36]

    Ertel S., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aafe04 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..110E 157, 110

    2019 doi

  28. [37]

    A., Plez B., The P

    Fluks M. A., Plez B., The P. S., de Winter D., Westerlund B. E., Steenman H. C., 1994, A&AS, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A\

    1994

  29. [38]

    E., Argyle R

    Fresneau A., Vaughan A. E., Argyle R. W., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077153 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469.1221F 469, 1221

    2007 doi

  30. [39]

    Freytag B., Liljegren S., H \"o fner S., 2017, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629594 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A\

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  32. [41]

    arXiv:2208.00211

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220800211G p. arXiv:2208.00211

    2022 arXiv

  33. [42]

    R., et al., 2017, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stw2708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465..403G 465, 403

    Goldman S. R., et al., 2017, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stw2708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465..403G 465, 403

    2017 doi

  34. [43]

    Griv E., Gedalin M., Eichler D., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3520 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.3520G 137, 3520

    2009 doi

  35. [44]

    Groenewegen M. A. T., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011A&A...526A.162G 526, A162

    2011 doi

  36. [45]

    Groenewegen M. A. T., et al., 2016, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629590 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A\

    2016 doi

  37. [46]

    A., Heyer M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149...64G 149, 64

    Gutermuth R. A., Heyer M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149...64G 149, 64

    2015 doi

  38. [47]

    1988, Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) Catalogs and Atlases.Volume 7: The Small Scale Structure Catalog. Vol. 7

    1988

  39. [48]

    Hackstein M., et al., 2015, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201512195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AN....336..590H 336, 590

    2015 doi

  40. [49]

    K., Duffau S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..106H 144, 106

    Haschke R., Grebel E. K., Duffau S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..106H 144, 106

    2012 doi

  41. [50]

    N., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aae47f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..241H 156, 241

    Heinze A. N., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aae47f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..241H 156, 241

    2018 doi

  42. [51]

    W., eds, 1988, Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) Catalogs and Atlases.Volume 7: The Small Scale Structure Catalog

    Helou G., Walker D. W., eds, 1988, Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) Catalogs and Atlases.Volume 7: The Small Scale Structure Catalog. Vol. 7

    1988

  43. [52]

    A., Levine S., Terrell D., Welch D

    Henden A. A., Levine S., Terrell D., Welch D. L., 2015, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#225. p. 336.16

    2015

  44. [53]

    Herwig F., 2005, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150600 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ARA\

    2005 arXiv

  45. [54]

    366, The Origin of Outflows in Evolved Stars

    H \"o fner S., Freytag B., 2022, in Decin L., Zijlstra A., Gielen C., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 366, The Origin of Outflows in Evolved Stars. pp 165--172 ( @eprint arXiv 2204.09728 ), @doi 10.1017/S1743921322000199

    2022 arXiv

  46. [55]

    H \"o fner S., Olofsson H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-017-0106-5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  47. [56]

    J., Kwok S., Su K

    Hrivnak B. J., Kwok S., Su K. Y. L., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320400 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....121.2775H 121, 2775

    2001 doi

  48. [57]

    Y., Slijkhuis S., de Jong T., Jiang B

    Hu J. Y., Slijkhuis S., de Jong T., Jiang B. W., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&AS..100..413H 100, 413

    1993

  49. [58]

    Iaconi R., Reichardt T., Staff J., De Marco O., Passy J.-C., Price D., Wurster J., Herwig F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2377 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.4028I 464, 4028

    2017 doi

  50. [59]

    J., Renzini A., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.21.090183.001415 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ARA&A..21..271I 21, 271

    Iben I. J., Renzini A., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.21.090183.001415 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ARA&A..21..271I 21, 271

    1983

  51. [60]

    Irabor T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1929 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.2423I 480, 2423

    2018 doi

  52. [61]

    Ishihara D., et al., 2010, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2010A\

    2010 doi

  53. [62]

    Jayasinghe T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty838 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.3145J 477, 3145

    2018 doi

  54. [63]

    L., Mitchell R

    Johnson H. L., Mitchell R. I., 1975, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975RMxAA...1..299J 1, 299

    1975

  55. [64]

    J \"o nsson H., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aba592 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160..120J 160, 120

    2020 doi

  56. [65]

    Jorissen A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526992 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...586A.158J 586, A158

    2016 doi

  57. [66]

    Juri \'c M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...673..864J 673, 864

    2008 doi

  58. [67]

    Kami \'n ski T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347770 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.133K 682, A133

    2024 doi

  59. [68]

    I., Lattanzio J

    Karakas A. I., Lattanzio J. C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2014.21 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PASA...31...30K 31, e030

    2014 doi

  60. [69]

    E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465..472K 465, 472

    Karim T., Mamajek E. E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465..472K 465, 472

    2017 doi

  61. [70]

    Kawada M., et al., 2007, @doi [PASJ] 10.1093/pasj/59.sp2.S389 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PASJ...59S.389K 59, S389

    2007 doi

  62. [71]

    Kharchenko N., Kilpio E., Malkov O., Schilbach E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020084 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...384..925K 384, 925

    2002 doi

  63. [72]

    Khouri T., Vlemmings W. H. T., Tafoya D., P \'e rez-S \'a nchez A. F., S \'a nchez Contreras C., G \'o mez J. F., Imai H., Sahai R., 2021, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-021-01528-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NatAs...6..275K 6, 275

    2021 doi

  64. [73]

    H., Scicluna P., Chu Y.-H., Mauron N., Ueta T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abf6cc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914...35K 914, 35

    Kim H., Lee H.-G., Ohyama Y., Kim J. H., Scicluna P., Chu Y.-H., Mauron N., Ueta T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abf6cc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914...35K 914, 35

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    R., Young K., Lee E., Jorissen A., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJS..117..209K 117, 209

    Knapp G. R., Young K., Lee E., Jorissen A., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/313111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJS..117..209K 117, 209

    1998 doi

  66. [75]

    D., de Wit W

    Koumpia E., Oudmaijer R. D., de Wit W. J., M \'e rand A., Black J. H., Ababakr K. M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1998 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.2766K 515, 2766

    2022 doi

  67. [76]

    Kroupa P., 2001, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..231K 322, 231

    2001

  68. [77]

    Kunder A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/75 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...75K 153, 75

    2017 doi

  69. [78]

    Lagadec E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18557.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417...32L 417, 32

    2011

  70. [79]

    L., Gustafsson B., Eriksson K., Hinkle K

    Lambert D. L., Gustafsson B., Eriksson K., Hinkle K. H., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJS...62..373L 62, 373

    1986 doi

  71. [80]

    Lang D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147..108L 147, 108

    2014 doi

  72. [81]

    Lindegren L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A...4L 649, A4

    2021 doi

  73. [82]

    F., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&AS...99..291L 99, 291

    Loup C., Forveille T., Omont A., Paul J. F., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&AS...99..291L 99, 291

    1993

  74. [84]

    E., Kelker D

    Lutz T. E., Kelker D. H., 1973, @doi [PASP] 10.1086/129506 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973PASP...85..573L 85, 573

    1973 doi

  75. [85]

    Mainzer A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792...30M 792, 30

    2014 doi

  76. [86]

    G., 1922, Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1922MeLuF.100....1M 100, 1

    Malmquist K. G., 1922, Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie I, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1922MeLuF.100....1M 100, 1

    1922

  77. [87]

    Maraston C., Daddi E., Renzini A., Cimatti A., Dickinson M., Papovich C., Pasquali A., Pirzkal N., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/508143 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...652...85M 652, 85

    2006 doi

  78. [88]

    Marigo P., Girardi L., Bressan A., Groenewegen M. A. T., Silva L., Granato G. L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078467 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A

    2008 doi

  79. [89]

    Marocco F., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abd805 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..253....8M 253, 8

    2021 doi

  80. [90]

    arXiv:1901.06325

    McDonald I., Trabucchi M., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019arXiv190106325M p. arXiv:1901.06325

    2019 arXiv

  81. [91]

    A., 2015a, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stu2202 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446.2226M 446, 2226

    McDonald I., Zijlstra A. A., 2015a, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stu2202 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446.2226M 446, 2226

    doi

  82. [92]

    A., 2015b, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stv007 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448..502M 448, 502

    McDonald I., Zijlstra A. A., 2015b, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stv007 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448..502M 448, 502

    doi

  83. [93]

    A., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L38 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2016ApJ...823L..38M 823, L38

    McDonald I., Zijlstra A. A., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L38 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2016ApJ...823L..38M 823, L38

    2016 doi

  84. [94]

    L., van Loon J

    McDonald I., Boyer M. L., van Loon J. T., Zijlstra A. A., 2011, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/71 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730...71M 730, 71

    2011 doi

  85. [96]

    A., Sloan G

    McDonald I., Zijlstra A. A., Sloan G. C., Lagadec E., Johnson C. I., Uttenthaler S., Jones O. C., Smith C. L., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2942 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456.4542M 456, 4542

    2016 doi

  86. [98]

    A., Watson R

    McDonald I., Zijlstra A. A., Watson R. A., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1433 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471..770M 471, 770

    doi

  87. [99]

    A., Lagadec E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2607 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.4984M 481, 4984

    McDonald I., De Beck E., Zijlstra A. A., Lagadec E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2607 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.4984M 481, 4984

    2018 doi

  88. [100]

    L., Groenewegen M

    McDonald I., Boyer M. L., Groenewegen M. A. T., Lagadec E., Richards A. M. S., Sloan G. C., Zijlstra A. A., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019arXiv190105416M p. arXiv:1901.05416

    2019 arXiv

  89. [101]

    A., Richards A

    McDonald I., Uttenthaler S., Zijlstra A. A., Richards A. M. S., Lagadec E., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.1174M 491, 1174

    2020 doi

  90. [102]

    A., Cox N

    McDonald I., Zijlstra A. A., Cox N. L. J., Alexander E. L., Csukai A., Ramkumar R., Hollings A., 2024, @doi [RAS Techniques and Instruments] 10.1093/rasti/rzae005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024RASTI...3...89M 3, 89

    2024 doi

  91. [103]

    G., Banerji M., Gonzalez E., Koposov S

    McMahon R. G., Banerji M., Gonzalez E., Koposov S. E., Bejar V. J., Lodieu N., Rebolo R., VHS Collaboration 2013, The Messenger, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Msngr.154...35M 154, 35

    2013

  92. [104]

    M \`e ge P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038956 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...646A..74M 646, A74

    2021 doi

  93. [105]

    C., Nitschelm C., 1989, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A&AS...81..401M 81, 401

    Mermilliod J. C., Nitschelm C., 1989, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A&AS...81..401M 81, 401

    1989

  94. [106]

    Michalik D., Lindegren L., Hobbs D., 2015, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425310 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A\

    2015 doi

  95. [107]

    Minniti D., et al., 2010, @doi [New Astronomy] 10.1016/j.newast.2009.12.002 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010NewA...15..433M 15, 433

    2010 doi

  96. [108]

    Mongui \'o M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...638A..18M 638, A18

    2020 doi

  97. [109]

    Morel M., Magnenat P., 1978, A&AS, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978A\

    1978

  98. [110]

    G., Steiner A

    Newton W. G., Steiner A. W., Yagi K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaafd1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856...19N 856, 19

    2018 doi

  99. [111]

    T., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...665A.126N 665, A126

    Nguyen C. T., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...665A.126N 665, A126

    2022 doi

  100. [112]

    J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9bf4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....155...39O 155, 39

    Oelkers R. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9bf4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....155...39O 155, 39

    2018 doi

  101. [113]

    M., et al., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&AS...65..607O 65, 607

    Olnon F. M., et al., 1986, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986A&AS...65..607O 65, 607

    1986

  102. [114]

    Paczy \'n ski B., 1971, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971AcA....21..417P 21, 417

    1971

  103. [115]

    J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21706.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426..903P 426, 903

    Page M. J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21706.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426..903P 426, 903

    2012

  104. [116]

    S., Vijapurkar J., Takeda Y., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/64.3.57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASJ...64...57P 64, 57

    Parthasarathy M., Drilling J. S., Vijapurkar J., Takeda Y., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/64.3.57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASJ...64...57P 64, 57

    2012 doi

  105. [117]

    Pastorelli G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.5666P 485, 5666

    2019 doi

  106. [118]

    Perryman M. A. C., ESA eds, 1997, The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues. Astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission ESA Special Publication Vol. 1200

    1997

  107. [119]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526914 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...594A..26P 594, A26

    2016 doi

  108. [120]

    D., Smith B

    Price S. D., Smith B. J., Kuchar T. A., Mizuno D. R., Kraemer K. E., 2010, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/190/2/203 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJS..190..203P 190, 203

    2010 doi

  109. [122]

    Queiroz A. B. A., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...638A..76Q 638, A76

    doi

  110. [124]

    Ramos-Medina J., S \'a nchez Contreras C., Garc \' a-Lario P., Rodrigo C., da Silva Santos J., Solano E., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...611A..41R 611, A41

    doi

  111. [125]

    Ramstedt S., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936874 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...640A.133R 640, A133

    2020 doi

  112. [126]

    Riebel D., Meixner M., Fraser O., Srinivasan S., Cook K., Vijh U., 2010, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1195 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...723.1195R 723, 1195

    2010 doi

  113. [127]

    Riebel D., Srinivasan S., Sargent B., Meixner M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753...71R 753, 71

    2012 doi

  114. [128]

    P., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2413R 136, 2413

    Robitaille T. P., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2413R 136, 2413

    2008 doi

  115. [129]

    Ruffle P. M. E., et al., 2015, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stv1106 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3504R 451, 3504

    2015 doi

  116. [130]

    R., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1015 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714.1015S 714, 1015

    Samal M. R., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1015 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714.1015S 714, 1015

    2010 doi

  117. [131]

    N., Kazarovets E

    Samus' N. N., Kazarovets E. V., Durlevich O. V., Kireeva N. N., Pastukhova E. N., 2017, @doi [Astronomy Reports] 10.1134/S1063772917010085 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARep...61...80S 61, 80

    2017 doi

  118. [132]

    T., Khosroshahi H

    Saremi E., Javadi A., Navabi M., van Loon J. T., Khosroshahi H. G., Bojnordi Arbab B., McDonald I., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2d96 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923..164S 923, 164

    2021 doi

  119. [133]

    F., Meisner A

    Schlafly E. F., Meisner A. M., Green G. M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aafbea , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..240...30S 240, 30

    2019 doi

  120. [134]

    Schuller F., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811568 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...504..415S 504, 415

    2009 doi

  121. [135]

    Scicluna P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.1091S 512, 1091

    2022 doi

  122. [136]

    N., Chapman J

    Sevenster M. N., Chapman J. M., Habing H. J., Killeen N. E. B., Lindqvist M., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1997365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&AS..124..509S 124, 509

    1997 doi

  123. [137]

    Si \'o dmiak N., Meixner M., Ueta T., Sugerman B. E. K., Van de Steene G. C., Szczerba R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/529115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...677..382S 677, 382

    2008 doi

  124. [138]

    F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    2006 doi

  125. [139]

    C., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/44 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826...44S 826, 44

    Sloan G. C., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/44 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826...44S 826, 44

    2016 doi

  126. [140]

    J., Price S

    Smith B. J., Price S. D., Baker R. I., 2004, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/423248 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2004ApJS..154..673S 154, 673

    2004 doi

  127. [141]

    C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2789 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1826S 474, 1826

    Smith L. C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2789 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1826S 474, 1826

    2018 doi

  128. [142]

    B., Penzias A

    Solomon P., Jefferts K. B., Penzias A. A., Wilson R. W., 1971, @doi [ ] 10.1086/180665 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971ApJ...163L..53S 163, L53

    1971 doi

  129. [143]

    Soubiran C., Le Campion J.-F., Brouillet N., Chemin L., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628497 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...591A.118S 591, A118

    2016 doi

  130. [144]

    M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2999 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.3211S 518, 3211

    Soulain A., Lamberts A., Millour F., Tuthill P., Lau R. M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2999 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.3211S 518, 3211

    2023 doi

  131. [145]

    L., Drimmel R., Giacobbe P., Lattanzi M

    Sozzetti A., Smart R. L., Drimmel R., Giacobbe P., Lattanzi M. G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slx082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471L...1S 471, L1

    2017 doi

  132. [147]

    A., Meixner M., 2011b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117033 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A

    Srinivasan S., Sargent B. A., Meixner M., 2011b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117033 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A

    doi

  133. [148]

    R., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...458..173S 458, 173

    Su \'a rez O., Garc \' a-Lario P., Manchado A., Manteiga M., Ulla A., Pottasch S. R., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...458..173S 458, 173

    2006 doi

  134. [149]

    R., Kiss L

    Tabur V., Bedding T. R., Kiss L. L., Moon T. T., Szeidl B., Kjeldsen H., 2009, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15588.x , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2009MNRAS.400.1945T 400, 1945

    2009

  135. [150]

    A., Torrelles J

    Tafoya D., G \'o mez Y., Patel N. A., Torrelles J. M., G \'o mez J. F., Anglada G., Miranda L. F., de Gregorio-Monsalvo I., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/611 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...691..611T 691, 611

    2009 doi

  136. [151]

    Tailo M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2639 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.5745T 498, 5745

    2020 doi

  137. [152]

    R., Mattei J

    Templeton M. R., Mattei J. A., Willson L. A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/431740 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130..776T 130, 776

    2005 doi

  138. [153]

    R., Mowlavi N., Pastorelli G., Marigo P., Girardi L., Lebzelter T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3356 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1575T 500, 1575

    Trabucchi M., Wood P. R., Mowlavi N., Pastorelli G., Marigo P., Girardi L., Lebzelter T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3356 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1575T 500, 1575

    2021 doi

  139. [154]

    S., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...501..539U 501, 539

    Urquhart J. S., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...501..539U 501, 539

    2009 doi

  140. [155]

    Uttenthaler S., McDonald I., Bernhard K., Cristallo S., Gobrecht D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833794 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.120U 622, A120

    2019 doi

  141. [156]

    Uttenthaler S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.393U 690, A393

    2024 doi

  142. [157]

    L., Lallement R., Cox N

    Vergely J. L., Lallement R., Cox N. L. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243319 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...664A.174V 664, A174

    2022 doi

  143. [158]

    Verhoelst T., van Aarle E., Acke B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...470L..21V 470, L21

    2007 doi

  144. [159]

    Vogt N., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..227....6V 227, 6

    2016 doi

  145. [160]

    Wallstr \"o m S. H. J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...597A..99W 597, A99

    2017 doi

  146. [161]

    L., Henden A

    Watson C. L., Henden A. A., Price A., 2006, Society for Astronomical Sciences Annual Symposium, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006SASS...25...47W 25, 47

    2006

  147. [162]

    A., Feast M

    Whitelock P. A., Feast M. W., van Leeuwen F., 2008, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13032.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.386..313W 386, 313

    2008

  148. [163]

    R., 2015, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stv289 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.3829W 448, 3829

    Wood P. R., 2015, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stv289 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.3829W 448, 3829

    2015 doi

  149. [164]

    R., Williams S

    Wo \'z niak P. R., Williams S. J., Vestrand W. T., Gupta V., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425526 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128.2965W 128, 2965

    2004 doi

  150. [165]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    Wright E. L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    2010 doi

  151. [166]

    Xiang M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab5364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..245...34X 245, 34

    2019 doi

  152. [167]

    Yin Z., Hinkel A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ea , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963..136Y 963, 136

    2024 doi

  153. [168]

    W., Frankel N., Xiang M., Poggio E., Drimmel R., Tkachenko A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039726 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650A.112Z 650, A112

    Zari E., Rix H. W., Frankel N., Xiang M., Poggio E., Drimmel R., Tkachenko A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039726 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650A.112Z 650, A112

    2021 doi

  154. [169]

    Zhao G., Zhao Y.-H., Chu Y.-Q., Jing Y.-P., Deng L.-C., 2012, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/12/7/002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012RAA....12..723Z 12, 723

    2012 doi

  155. [170]

    de Wit S., Bonanos A. Z., Tramper F., Yang M., Maravelias G., Boutsia K., Britavskiy N., Zapartas E., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243394 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A..86D 669, A86

    2023 doi

  156. [171]

    L., Habing H

    te Lintel Hekkert P., Caswell J. L., Habing H. J., Haynes R. F., Haynes R. F., Norris R. P., 1991, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A&AS...90..327T 90, 327

    1991

  157. [172]

    van Leeuwen F., 2007, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078357 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A\

    2007 doi

  158. [173]

    T., Groenewegen M

    van Loon J. T., Groenewegen M. A. T., de Koter A., Trams N. R., Waters L. B. F. M., Zijlstra A. A., Whitelock P. A., Loup C., 1999, A&A, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1999A\ 351, 559

    1999

  159. [174]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  160. [175]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.