pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2506.14875 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-17 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Regular Vaidya solutions of effective gravitational theories

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 08:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords Vaidya solutionsregular black holeseffective gravitational theoriesspherically symmetric spacetimesgravitational collapsemodified gravityexact solutionsblack hole mimickers
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Regular Vaidya solutions exist in second-order effective gravitational theories and describe the dynamical formation or evolution of regular black holes via radiation collapse or accretion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper initiates the study of spherically symmetric spacetime dynamics beyond general relativity by constructing exact solutions in second-order effective gravitational theories defined only through the symmetries of the problem in four or more dimensions. It proves that regular Vaidya-type metrics are solutions, representing the formation, mass change, or disappearance of regular black holes or black hole mimickers through the collapse or accretion of radiation, with time-reversed processes included. A sympathetic reader would care because this framework supplies simple, exact dynamical models for regular gravitational collapse without invoking higher-derivative terms, and it demonstrates how gravitational modifications can eliminate curvature singularities by transferring energy between matter and gravitational degrees of freedom. The results also show how to promote geometrically constructed regular black hole spacetimes into fully dynamical solutions within the theory.

Core claim

We prove the existence of regular Vaidya solutions that represent the formation or change in mass of regular black holes (or black hole mimickers) due to the gravitational collapse or accretion of radiation, with the time reverse of these processes being also included as solutions. Our treatment and results are remarkable in their simplicity and the breadth of possibilities they provide for novel theoretical applications and discoveries in the context of regular gravitational collapse. For instance, we illustrate how modifications of the gravitational dynamics can cure curvature singularities through what can be interpreted as an energy transfer between matter and gravitational degrees of 0f

What carries the argument

Regular Vaidya solutions in second-order effective gravitational theories defined solely by the symmetries of the spherically symmetric problem.

Load-bearing premise

The effective gravitational theories must be second-order and defined solely in terms of the symmetries of the spherically symmetric problem so that the field equations admit regular Vaidya-type solutions without extra higher-derivative or non-local terms altering the dynamics.

What would settle it

Compute the field equations of a second-order effective theory constructed from spherical symmetry alone and check whether a Vaidya metric with a time-dependent mass function satisfies them while remaining regular at the center for a range of mass functions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14875 by Ra\'ul Carballo-Rubio, Valentin Boyanov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We initiate the study of the dynamics of spherically symmetric spacetimes beyond general relativity through exact solutions of the field equations of second-order effective gravitational theories defined solely in terms of the symmetries of the problem in four or more dimensions. We prove the existence of regular Vaidya solutions that represent the formation or change in mass of regular black holes (or black hole mimickers) due to the gravitational collapse or accretion of radiation, with the time reverse of these processes being also included as solutions. Our treatment and results are remarkable in their simplicity and the breadth of possibilities they provide for novel theoretical applications and discoveries in the context of regular gravitational collapse. For instance, we illustrate how modifications of the gravitational dynamics can cure curvature singularities through what can be interpreted as an energy transfer between matter and gravitational degrees of freedom. As another application, we show how to incorporate spacetimes frequently used in the literature, designed geometrically to represent the formation and disappearance of regular black holes, as fully dynamical solutions within this formalism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper initiates the study of spherically symmetric spacetimes beyond general relativity via exact solutions of second-order effective gravitational theories defined solely by the symmetries of the problem in four or more dimensions. It proves the existence of regular Vaidya solutions representing the formation or mass change of regular black holes (or mimickers) due to collapse or accretion of radiation, including time-reversed cases. The work shows how gravitational modifications can resolve curvature singularities through energy transfer between matter and gravitational degrees of freedom and incorporates geometrically constructed regular black hole spacetimes as fully dynamical solutions within the formalism.

Significance. If the central existence result holds, the manuscript supplies a technically simple framework for constructing exact dynamical solutions describing regular black hole formation and evolution in a broad class of effective theories. This opens avenues for theoretical exploration of singularity resolution and black hole mimickers without invoking higher-derivative or non-local terms, and it provides a systematic way to promote static regular geometries to time-dependent collapse or accretion processes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Field equations construction] The section constructing the general field equations from spherical symmetry: the claim that these equations are strictly second-order and admit the regular Vaidya ansatz without auxiliary constraints needs an explicit display of the most general allowed tensor structures (or their reduced form after imposing the Vaidya metric) so that readers can verify that regularity is not imposed by hand on the mass function.
  2. [Vaidya ansatz substitution] The substitution of the Vaidya ansatz with the chosen mass function (ensuring finite curvature scalars at r=0): the verification that the resulting system is identically satisfied should include the explicit integration steps or algebraic identities that confirm the equations hold for arbitrary smooth mass functions compatible with the symmetry assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the effective Lagrangian or action could be introduced earlier to make the symmetry-based construction clearer before the field equations are written.
  2. [General setup] A short table or list summarizing the allowed second-order terms in different dimensions would help readers compare the four-dimensional case with the higher-dimensional generalizations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and recommendation for minor revision. The comments help improve the clarity of the presentation, and we address each point below with plans to revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Field equations construction] The section constructing the general field equations from spherical symmetry: the claim that these equations are strictly second-order and admit the regular Vaidya ansatz without auxiliary constraints needs an explicit display of the most general allowed tensor structures (or their reduced form after imposing the Vaidya metric) so that readers can verify that regularity is not imposed by hand on the mass function.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit display would aid verification. In the revised manuscript we will add the most general second-order tensor structures allowed by spherical symmetry (in four and higher dimensions) before reduction. We will then substitute the Vaidya metric explicitly and show that the resulting equations hold without auxiliary constraints on the mass function; regularity at r=0 follows from the dynamical energy transfer in the effective theory rather than being imposed by hand. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Vaidya ansatz substitution] The substitution of the Vaidya ansatz with the chosen mass function (ensuring finite curvature scalars at r=0): the verification that the resulting system is identically satisfied should include the explicit integration steps or algebraic identities that confirm the equations hold for arbitrary smooth mass functions compatible with the symmetry assumptions.

    Authors: We accept the suggestion for greater explicitness. The revised version will include the full substitution of the Vaidya ansatz, followed by the algebraic reductions and any integrations required to demonstrate that the field equations are satisfied identically for any sufficiently smooth mass function m(v,r) that keeps curvature scalars finite at r=0. This confirms the result holds under the stated symmetry assumptions without additional restrictions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; self-contained existence proof

full rationale

The paper constructs the most general second-order field equations invariant under spherical symmetry, substitutes the Vaidya ansatz with a mass function chosen for finite curvature scalars at r=0, and directly verifies that the system holds (including time-reversed cases). Regularity follows from the smoothness of the mass function together with the second-order structure; no parameters are fitted to data, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the existence result, and the derivation does not reduce to its inputs by definition. This is a standard direct verification within the symmetry-constrained theory space.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that second-order effective theories can be defined purely from spherical symmetry and that the resulting equations admit regular null-fluid solutions; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spherically symmetric spacetimes in four or more dimensions admit a Vaidya-type metric ansatz with null radiation.
    Invoked when constructing the regular Vaidya solutions from the symmetries of the problem.
  • domain assumption The effective gravitational theories are second-order and contain no higher-derivative terms that would change the character of the solutions.
    Stated in the definition of the theories under study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5701 in / 1461 out tokens · 36345 ms · 2026-05-19T08:46:50.982480+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. All $2D$ generalised dilaton theories from $d\geq 4$ gravities

    hep-th 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Generic 2D Horndeski theories arise from dimensional reduction of d≥4 gravities, yielding a Birkhoff theorem for quasi-topological gravities where static spherically symmetric solutions satisfy g_tt g_rr = -1 and are ...

  2. Effective geometrodynamics for renormalization-group improved black-hole spacetimes in spherical symmetry

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RG-improved black hole spacetimes with scale-dependent gravitational coupling are derived as vacuum solutions to 2D Horndeski master field equations, embedding prior works and exposing implementation discrepancies.

  3. $g_{tt}g_{rr} =-1$ black hole thermodynamics in extended quasi-topological gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified framework links the generating function for static black holes satisfying g_tt g_rr=-1 in extended quasi-topological gravity to thermodynamic mass and Wald entropy via an effective 2D dilaton theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk,

    J. P. Luminet, “Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk,” Astron. Astrophys. 75 (1979) 228–235

  2. [2]

    Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies,

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, “Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies,” Phys. Rept. 947 (2022) 1–39, arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    Visual Horizons in World Models,

    W. Rindler, “Visual Horizons in World Models,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 116 no. 6, (1956) 662–677

  4. [4]

    New theoretical approaches to black holes

    E. Gourgoulhon and J. L. Jaramillo, “New theoretical approaches to black holes,” New Astron. Rev. 51 (2008) 791–798, arXiv:0803.2944 [astro-ph] . 12

  5. [5]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 14 (1965) 57–59

  6. [6]

    The 1965 Penrose singularity theorem

    J. M. M. Senovilla and D. Garfinkle, “The 1965 Penrose singularity theorem,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32 no. 12, (2015) 124008, arXiv:1410.5226 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 6, (2016) 061102, arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

  8. [8]

    Review of the Advanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Observatories Leading to Observing Run Four,

    C. Cahillane and G. Mansell, “Review of the Advanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Observatories Leading to Observing Run Four,” Galaxies 10 no. 1, (2022) 36, arXiv:2202.00847 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L1, arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

  10. [10]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 930 no. 2, (2022) L12

  11. [11]

    Information Loss

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, “Information Loss,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 no. 9, (2017) 092002, arXiv:1703.02140 [hep-th]

  12. [12]

    On the assumptions leading to the information loss paradox,

    L. Buoninfante, F. Di Filippo, and S. Mukohyama, “On the assumptions leading to the information loss paradox,” JHEP 10 (2021) 081, arXiv:2107.05662 [hep-th]

  13. [13]

    Internal instability in a Reissner-Nordstrom black hole,

    M. Simpson and R. Penrose, “Internal instability in a Reissner-Nordstrom black hole,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 7 (1973) 183–197

  14. [14]

    Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes,

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, “Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 1663–1666

  15. [15]

    Internal structure of black holes,

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, “Internal structure of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D41 (1990) 1796–1809

  16. [16]

    Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution,

    A. Ori, “Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 789–792

  17. [17]

    Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,

    R. Carballo-Rubio et al., “Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,” JCAP 05 (2025) 003, arXiv:2501.05505 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    Black holes in asymptotically safe gravity and beyond,

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held, “Black holes in asymptotically safe gravity and beyond,” in 13 Regular Black Holes: Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse , C. Bambi, ed., pp. 131–183. Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. arXiv:2212.09495 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Regular black holes from Loop Quantum Gravity,

    A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh, “Regular black holes from Loop Quantum Gravity,” in Regular Black Holes: Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse , C. Bambi, ed., pp. 235–282. Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. arXiv:2301.01309 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Gravity,

    A. Platania, “Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Gravity,” in Handbook of Quantum Gravity, C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro, eds., pp. 1–65. Springer Nature Singapore,

  21. [21]

    arXiv:2302.04272 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Sifting quantum black holes through the principle of least action,

    B. Knorr and A. Platania, “Sifting quantum black holes through the principle of least action,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 2, (2022) L021901, arXiv:2202.01216 [hep-th]

  23. [23]

    Suppression of spacetime singularities in quantum gravity,

    J. N. Borissova, “Suppression of spacetime singularities in quantum gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 41 no. 12, (2024) 127002, arXiv:2309.05695 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Well-Posed Formulation of Scalar-Tensor Effective Field Theory,

    A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, “Well-Posed Formulation of Scalar-Tensor Effective Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 no. 22, (2020) 221101, arXiv:2003.04327 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Well-posed formulation of Lovelock and Horndeski theories,

    A. D. Kov´ acs and H. S. Reall, “Well-posed formulation of Lovelock and Horndeski theories,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 12, (2020) 124003, arXiv:2003.08398 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Solving the initial conditions problem for modified gravity theories,

    S. E. Brady, L. Arest´ e Sal´ o, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and A. P. S., “Solving the initial conditions problem for modified gravity theories,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 10, (2023) 104022, arXiv:2308.16791 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    The gravitational field of a radiating star,

    P. C. Vaidya, “The gravitational field of a radiating star,” Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A 33 no. 5, (1951) 264

  28. [28]

    Newtonian Time in General Relativity,

    P. C. Vaidya, “Newtonian Time in General Relativity,” Nature 171 (1953) 260–261

  29. [29]

    An Analytical Solution for Gravitational Collapse with Radiation,

    P. C. Vaidya, “An Analytical Solution for Gravitational Collapse with Radiation,” Astrophys. J. 144 (1966) 943

  30. [30]

    Les Houches Lectures on Black Holes

    A. Strominger, “Les Houches lectures on black holes,” in NATO Advanced Study Institute: Les Houches Summer School, Session 62: Fluctuating Geometries in Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory . 8, 1994. arXiv:hep-th/9501071

  31. [31]

    Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics

    E. Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics . Cambridge University Press, 12, 2009

  32. [32]

    Non-symmetric trapped surfaces in the Schwarzschild and Vaidya spacetimes

    E. Schnetter and B. Krishnan, “Non-symmetric trapped surfaces in the Schwarzschild and Vaidya spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 021502, arXiv:gr-qc/0511017. 14

  33. [33]

    Outer Trapped Surfaces in Vaidya Spacetimes

    I. Ben-Dov, “Outer Trapped Surfaces in Vaidya Spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 064007, arXiv:gr-qc/0611057

  34. [34]

    A Note on trapped Surfaces in the Vaidya Solution

    I. Bengtsson and J. M. M. Senovilla, “A Note on trapped Surfaces in the Vaidya Solution,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 024027, arXiv:0809.2213 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    The slicing dependence of non-spherically symmetric quasi-local horizons in Vaidya Spacetimes

    A. B. Nielsen, M. Jasiulek, B. Krishnan, and E. Schnetter, “The Slicing dependence of non-spherically symmetric quasi-local horizons in Vaidya Spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 124022, arXiv:1007.2990 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Quantum radiation from an evaporating non-singular black hole

    V. P. Frolov and A. Zelnikov, “Quantum radiation from an evaporating nonsingular black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 12, (2017) 124028, arXiv:1704.03043 [hep-th]

  37. [37]

    Regular black holes with stable cores,

    A. Bonanno, A.-P. Khosravi, and F. Saueressig, “Regular black holes with stable cores,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 12, (2021) 124027, arXiv:2010.04226 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Inner horizon instability and the unstable cores of regular black holes,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio, and M. Visser, “Inner horizon instability and the unstable cores of regular black holes,” JHEP 05 (2021) 132, arXiv:2101.05006 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    Mass Inflation without Cauchy Horizons,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Mass Inflation without Cauchy Horizons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 18, (2024) 181402, arXiv:2402.14913 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Global Structure of Evaporating Black Holes

    M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, “Global structure of evaporating black holes,” Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 24–29, arXiv:gr-qc/9807031

  41. [41]

    Formation and evaporation of non-singular black holes

    S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 031103, arXiv:gr-qc/0506126

  42. [42]

    Information loss problem and a `black hole' model with a closed apparent horizon

    V. P. Frolov, “Information loss problem and a ’black hole‘ model with a closed apparent horizon,” JHEP 05 (2014) 049, arXiv:1402.5446 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    The principle of symmetric criticality,

    R. S. Palais, “The principle of symmetric criticality,” Commun. Math. Phys. 69 no. 1, (1979) 19–30

  44. [44]

    The Principle of Symmetric Criticality in General Relativity

    M. E. Fels and C. G. Torre, “The Principle of symmetric criticality in general relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 641–676, arXiv:gr-qc/0108033

  45. [45]

    Symmetry reduction of gravitational Lagrangians,

    G. Frausto, I. Kol´ aˇ r, T. M´ alek, and C. Torre, “Symmetry reduction of gravitational Lagrangians,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 6, (2025) 064062, arXiv:2410.11036 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,

    G. W. Horndeski, “Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 363–384

  47. [47]

    Horndeski theory and beyond: a review

    T. Kobayashi, “Horndeski theory and beyond: a review,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 no. 8, (2019) 15 086901, arXiv:1901.07183 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and A. J. Murcia, “Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 no. 18, (2025) 181401, arXiv:2412.02742 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    Regular black holes from thin-shell collapse,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and A. J. Murcia, “Regular black holes from thin-shell collapse,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 10, (2025) 104009, arXiv:2412.02740 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Regular black holes from Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, A. J. Murcia, and A. Vicente-Cano, “Regular black holes from Oppenheimer-Snyder collapse,” arXiv:2505.09680 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    Singularity resolution and inflation from an infinite tower of regularized curvature corrections,

    P. G. S. Fernandes, “Singularity resolution and inflation from an infinite tower of regularized curvature corrections,” arXiv:2504.07692 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    Colleaux, Regular black hole and cosmological spacetimes in Non-Polynomial Gravity theories

    A. Colleaux, Regular black hole and cosmological spacetimes in Non-Polynomial Gravity theories. PhD thesis, Trento University, 2019

  53. [53]

    Dust collapse in asymptotic safety: a path to regular black holes

    A. Bonanno, D. Malafarina, and A. Panassiti, “Dust Collapse in Asymptotic Safety: A Path to Regular Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 no. 3, (2024) 031401, arXiv:2308.10890 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    The Vaidya Solution in Higher Dimensions,

    B. R. Iyer and C. V. Vishveshwara, “The Vaidya Solution in Higher Dimensions,” Pramana 32 (1989) 749–752

  55. [55]

    New 2D dilaton gravity for nonsingular black holes

    G. Kunstatter, H. Maeda, and T. Taves, “New 2D dilaton gravity for nonsingular black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33 no. 10, (2016) 105005, arXiv:1509.06746 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    The Classification of spaces defining gravitational fields,

    A. Z. Petrov, “The Classification of spaces defining gravitational fields,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 32 (2000) 1661–1663

  57. [57]

    Invariant formulation of gravitational radiation theory,

    F. A. E. Pirani, “Invariant formulation of gravitational radiation theory,” Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1089–1099

  58. [58]

    An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, “An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,” J. Math. Phys. 3 (1962) 566–578

  59. [59]

    Penrose and W

    R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and Space-Time. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 4, 2011

  60. [60]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt, Exact solutions of Einstein’s field equations. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003

  61. [61]

    Geometry of Vaidya spacetimes,

    A. Coudray and J.-P. Nicolas, “Geometry of Vaidya spacetimes,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 53 no. 8, (2021) 73, arXiv:2101.06544 [gr-qc] . 16

  62. [62]

    A Vaidya-type radiating solution in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its application to braneworld

    T. Kobayashi, “A Vaidya-type radiating solution in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its application to braneworld,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 37 (2005) 1869–1876, arXiv:gr-qc/0504027

  63. [63]

    Effects of Gauss-Bonnet term on the final fate of gravitational collapse

    H. Maeda, “Effects of Gauss-Bonnet terms on final fate of gravitational collapse,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2155, arXiv:gr-qc/0504028

  64. [64]

    Radiating black hole solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    A. E. Dominguez and E. Gallo, “Radiating black hole solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 064018, arXiv:gr-qc/0512150

  65. [65]

    Horizons of radiating black holes in Einstein gauss-bonnet gravity

    S. G. Ghosh and D. W. Deshkar, “Horizons of radiating black holes in Einstein gauss-bonnet gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 047504, arXiv:0801.2710 [gr-qc]

  66. [66]

    Generalized Vaidya Spacetime in Lovelock Gravity and Thermodynamics on Apparent Horizon

    R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, Y.-P. Hu, and S. P. Kim, “Generalized Vaidya Spacetime in Lovelock Gravity and Thermodynamics on Apparent Horizon,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 124012, arXiv:0810.2610 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Black Holes in Quasi-topological Gravity

    R. C. Myers and B. Robinson, “Black Holes in Quasi-topological Gravity,” JHEP 08 (2010) 067, arXiv:1003.5357 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: Black hole, Birkhoff's theorem and C-function

    J. Oliva and S. Ray, “A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: Black hole, Birkhoff’s theorem and C-function,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 225002, arXiv:1003.4773 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    Einsteinian cubic gravity

    P. Bueno and P. A. Cano, “Einsteinian cubic gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 10, (2016) 104005, arXiv:1607.06463 [hep-th]

  70. [70]

    Generalized quasi-topological gravity

    R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, and R. B. Mann, “Generalized quasitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 10, (2017) 104042, arXiv:1703.01631 [hep-th]

  71. [71]

    Quintessential Quartic Quasi-topological Quartet

    J. Ahmed, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, and M. Mir, “Quintessential Quartic Quasi-topological Quartet,” JHEP 05 (2017) 134, arXiv:1703.11007 [hep-th]

  72. [72]

    (Generalized) quasi-topological gravities at all orders,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, and R. A. Hennigar, “(Generalized) quasi-topological gravities at all orders,” Class. Quant. Grav. 37 no. 1, (2020) 015002, arXiv:1909.07983 [hep-th]

  73. [73]

    Generalized quasi-topological gravities: the whole shebang,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, M. Lu, and J. Moreno, “Generalized quasi-topological gravities: the whole shebang,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40 no. 1, (2023) 015004, arXiv:2203.05589 [hep-th]

  74. [74]

    Classification of generalized quasitopological gravities,

    J. Moreno and A. J. Murcia, “Classification of generalized quasitopological gravities,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 4, (2023) 044016, arXiv:2304.08510 [gr-qc]

  75. [75]

    Regular black holes from pure gravity,

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, and R. A. Hennigar, “Regular black holes from pure gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 861 (2025) 139260, arXiv:2403.04827 [gr-qc] . 17

  76. [76]

    Formation and evaporation of quantum black holes from the decoupling mechanism in quantum gravity,

    J. N. Borissova and A. Platania, “Formation and evaporation of quantum black holes from the decoupling mechanism in quantum gravity,” JHEP 03 (2023) 046, arXiv:2210.01138 [gr-qc]

  77. [77]

    The principled-parameterized approach to gravitational collapse,

    H. Delaporte and A. Eichhorn, “The principled-parameterized approach to gravitational collapse,” JCAP 03 (2025) 074, arXiv:2407.07862 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    Axisymmetric Numerical Relativity

    O. Rinne, Axisymmetric numerical relativity. Phd thesis, University of Cambridge, 2005. arXiv:gr-qc/0601064

  79. [79]

    Geodesically complete black holes,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Geodesically complete black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 084047, arXiv:1911.11200 [gr-qc]

  80. [80]

    A connection between regular black holes and horizonless ultracompact stars,

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “A connection between regular black holes and horizonless ultracompact stars,” JHEP 08 (2023) 046, arXiv:2211.05817 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.