Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Beyond the Rosetta Stone: Unification Forces in Generalization Dynamics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.11017 v2 pith:WWBTLEBQ submitted 2025-08-14 cs.CL cs.AI

Beyond the Rosetta Stone: Unification Forces in Generalization Dynamics

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords languagecross-lingualtransferunificationdynamicsfactstrainingcontrolled
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) struggle with cross-lingual knowledge transfer: they hallucinate when asked in one language about facts expressed in a different language during training. This work introduces a controlled setting to study the causes and dynamics of this phenomenon by training small Transformer models from scratch on synthetic multilingual datasets. We identify a learning phase wherein a model develops either separate or unified representations of the same facts across languages, and show that unification is essential for cross-lingual transfer. We also show that the degree of unification depends on mutual information between facts and training data language, and on how easy it is to extract that language. Based on these insights, we develop methods to modulate the level of cross-lingual transfer by manipulating data distribution and tokenization, and we introduce metrics and visualizations to formally characterize their effects on unification. Our work shows how controlled settings can shed light on pre-training dynamics and suggests new directions for improving cross-lingual transfer in LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LMs as Task-Specific Knowledge Bases: An Interpretability Analysis

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LMs store facts in task-specific parameter subsets, shown by inconsistent emergence across tasks during training and distinct localized parameters for the same fact.

  2. Rethinking Cross-lingual Gaps from a Statistical Viewpoint

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Cross-lingual accuracy gaps in LLMs are dominated by higher response variance in target languages, not missing knowledge; ensembling and variance-reduction prompts shrink the gap.