Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analysing Moral Bias in Finetuned LLMs through Mechanistic Interpretability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2510.12229 v3 pith:EUKSSP33 submitted 2025-10-14 cs.CL cs.AI

Analysing Moral Bias in Finetuned LLMs through Mechanistic Interpretability

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords llmsbiasbiasesmodelduringeffectfinetunedfinetuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to internalize human-like biases during finetuning, yet the mechanisms by which these biases manifest remain unclear. In this work, we investigated whether the well-known Knobe effect, a moral bias in intentionality judgements, emerges in finetuned LLMs and whether it can be traced back to specific components of the model. We conducted a Layer-Patching analysis across 3 open-weights LLMs and demonstrated that the bias is not only learned during finetuning but also localized in a specific set of layers. Surprisingly, we found that patching activations from the corresponding pretrained model into just a few critical layers is sufficient to eliminate the effect. Our findings offer new evidence that social biases in LLMs can be interpreted, localized, and mitigated through targeted interventions, without the need for model retraining.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. User identity conditions moral wrongness ratings in non-reasoning large language models

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Implicitly conveying a user's professional role in multi-turn LLM conversations shifts moral wrongness ratings across ten common-morality rules in two non-reasoning models.