pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.23117 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-28 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Probing Observable Features of Lorentz violation in Low-Energy Hov{r}ava Gravity with Accretion Disk Images of Black Hole

Meng-Die Zhao , Yu-Yan Wang , Ke-Jian He , Guo-Ping Li
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 04:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Lorentz violationHorava gravityblack hole imagesaccretion diskpolarizationray tracinginner shadow
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Lorentz violation parameter in low-energy Horava gravity alters black hole inner shadows and polarization patterns in accretion disk images.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the visible effects of Lorentz violation in low-energy Horava gravity through simulated images of black holes with thin accretion disks. Using backward ray-tracing to follow photon paths, the authors show how the parameter l changes the shape of the dark inner shadow and the patterns of polarized light. A smaller l makes the shadow more elliptical and aligned, while a larger l creates a distinct D-shaped boundary on one side. Positive l speeds up the black hole's rotation while negative l slows it, and these shifts also change how light is polarized near the edge. Detecting such features in future observations could test this modified gravity theory at low energies.

Core claim

The LV parameter l strongly affects the inner shadow, brightness asymmetry, and polarization properties of the thin disk. Decreasing l leads to a more elliptical and untilted inner shadow, while increasing l produces a pronounced leftward D-shaped structure of the critical curve. The sign of l determines whether the black hole angular velocity is enhanced or suppressed, and variations in l alter the distribution of polarized intensity and polarization direction especially near the critical curve.

What carries the argument

The LV parameter l, which modifies the black hole spacetime in low-energy Horava gravity and thereby changes the geodesics of photons emitted from the thin accretion disk.

If this is right

  • The decrease of the LV parameter l produces a more elliptical and untilted inner shadow in the black hole image.
  • Increasing l creates a leftward D-shaped structure in the critical curve of the photon ring.
  • The sign of l controls the direction of change in the black hole's angular velocity.
  • Changes in l modify the polarized intensity distribution and polarization direction near the critical curve.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining shadow shape with polarization measurements in future telescope images could tighten constraints on the LV parameter beyond what shadow shape alone provides.
  • This simulation method could be adapted to probe Lorentz violation in other modified gravity models using similar accretion disk setups.
  • Confirmation of these effects would demonstrate that strong-field black hole observations can test quantum gravity candidates at accessible energies.

Load-bearing premise

The thin-disk accretion model and ZAMO framework, along with numerical photon geodesics, capture the dominant observable effects without significant contributions from disk thickness, magnetic fields, or other unmodeled physics.

What would settle it

High-resolution images of a spinning black hole thin disk showing a circular inner shadow instead of the predicted leftward D-shape for positive l would falsify the influence of the Lorentz violation parameter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.23117 by Guo-Ping Li, Ke-Jian He, Meng-Die Zhao, Yu-Yan Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The method of stereographic projection Therefore, once the four-momentum of the photon is determined, its corresponding position on the screen can also be determined. More specifically, we choose the origin O′ on the screen and establish a standard Cartesian coordinate system [79] at this point. Based on the geometric relationships, the projection coordinates of point P onto this plane can then be determin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the pixels on the screen and field of view of the camera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Images of the rotating LV black hole illuminated by the thin disk in Hoˇrava gravity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The redshift of direct images of the thin disk, where the red and blue color represent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The redshift of lensed images of the thin disk. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The intensity distribution of the screen along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The polarized intensity tick plots of the rotating LV black hole with the observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The polarized intensity tick plots as well as the disk image for the prograde case, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The polarized intensity tick plots as well as the disk image for the retrograde case. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The observable images of Kerr black holes and LV black holes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of the intensity distributions along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Angular velocity Ω(r) as a function of r for different values of ℓ. with the Kerr case, we find that for the same radial position, a positive ℓ (e.g., ℓ = 0.99) considerably enhances the angular velocity, while a negative ℓ (e.g., ℓ = −0.99) suppresses it, leading to a very small angular velocity near the event horizon. The curves in the third subfigure correspond to the results shown in Fig.10. In summar… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the observable signatures of Lorentz violation (LV) in low-energy Horava gravity by simulating the images and polarization features of rotating LV black holes using a backward ray-tracing method. Within a thin-disk accretion model and the ZAMO framework, we numerically solve the geodesics equation of photon and simulate the corresponding thin-disk images and polarization patterns. The results show that the LV parameter l strongly affects the inner shadow, brightness asymmetry, and polarization properties of the thin disk. The decrease of l leads to a more elliptical and untilted inner shadow, while increasing l produces a pronounced leftward D-shaped structure of the critical curve. In addition, the variation of l alters the distribution of polarized intensity and polarization direction, especially near the critical curve. Moreover, it also shows that a positive l enhances the black hole's angular velocity, while a negative one suppresses it, indicating that the sign of l determines the trend direction of the LV effect. These findings suggest that future high-resolution EHT observations combining the thin-disk images and polarization patterns could provide valuable tests of the LV effect.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that Lorentz violation in low-energy Hořava gravity, parameterized by l, produces observable effects on black hole images and polarization. Using backward ray-tracing in a thin-disk accretion model with the ZAMO tetrad, the authors numerically integrate photon geodesics and report that decreasing l yields a more elliptical, untilted inner shadow while increasing l produces a leftward D-shaped critical curve; l also alters polarized intensity, polarization direction near the critical curve, and the black hole's angular velocity (positive l enhances it, negative l suppresses it). These signatures are presented as testable with future EHT observations.

Significance. If the numerical results hold under the stated assumptions, the work supplies concrete, falsifiable predictions for how a single LV parameter modifies strong-field observables (shadow shape, brightness asymmetry, and polarization) in a modified-gravity spacetime. The explicit numerical exploration of both positive and negative l, together with the polarization maps, constitutes a strength that could guide targeted EHT analyses. The overall significance remains moderate because the central attribution of changes to l rests on the thin-disk plus ZAMO proxy without quantified systematics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / thin-disk model description] Thin-disk accretion model (described in the methods and results sections): the paper adopts a standard thin-disk emissivity and orbital structure without providing a quantitative estimate of how the LV-modified metric back-reacts on disk thickness, temperature profile, or magnetic-field structure. Because the reported D-shaped critical curve and polarization shifts are attributed solely to photon geodesics in the fixed metric, this omission is load-bearing for the central claim that l produces dominant, isolated observable changes.
  2. [Numerical results / geodesic solver] Numerical geodesic integration (results and appendix on ray-tracing): no error analysis, convergence tests, or explicit baseline comparison to the l=0 (Kerr) case is reported for the inner-shadow ellipticity, brightness asymmetry, or polarization degree. Without these, the support for the specific trends with l remains moderate, as stated in the soundness assessment.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction should include a one-sentence reminder of the explicit form of the low-energy Hořava metric used (including the relation between l and the rotation parameter).
  2. [Figures] Figures showing critical curves and polarized intensity maps would benefit from direct side-by-side panels for l = 0, positive l, and negative l to make the claimed trends immediately visible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion and documentation that strengthens the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / thin-disk model description] Thin-disk accretion model (described in the methods and results sections): the paper adopts a standard thin-disk emissivity and orbital structure without providing a quantitative estimate of how the LV-modified metric back-reacts on disk thickness, temperature profile, or magnetic-field structure. Because the reported D-shaped critical curve and polarization shifts are attributed solely to photon geodesics in the fixed metric, this omission is load-bearing for the central claim that l produces dominant, isolated observable changes.

    Authors: We agree that the thin-disk model is an approximation and that a full quantification of back-reaction on disk thickness, temperature, and magnetic structure would require self-consistent accretion simulations. Our focus is on isolating the effects of the modified spacetime metric on null geodesics and the resulting images under standard thin-disk assumptions used throughout the literature. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit limitations paragraph in the methods section that discusses these assumptions, notes the absence of quantified back-reaction, and states that such effects are left for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical results / geodesic solver] Numerical geodesic integration (results and appendix on ray-tracing): no error analysis, convergence tests, or explicit baseline comparison to the l=0 (Kerr) case is reported for the inner-shadow ellipticity, brightness asymmetry, or polarization degree. Without these, the support for the specific trends with l remains moderate, as stated in the soundness assessment.

    Authors: We performed internal convergence checks and Kerr (l=0) comparisons during the production of the figures, but these were not documented in the original submission. In the revised version we will expand the appendix on ray-tracing to include (i) convergence tests with respect to integration tolerance and image resolution, (ii) quantitative error estimates on the reported shadow ellipticity and polarization degree, and (iii) side-by-side numerical values comparing the l ≠ 0 cases to the l = 0 Kerr baseline for the key observables. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical geodesic integration in LV-modified metric produces independent observable signatures

full rationale

The paper's central results follow from numerically solving the null geodesic equations in a fixed spacetime metric that incorporates the Lorentz-violation parameter l, then ray-tracing through a standard thin-disk emissivity model and ZAMO tetrad. These steps are direct forward computations whose outputs (inner-shadow shape, brightness asymmetry, polarization maps) are not algebraically or statistically forced to equal the input metric or any fitted quantity; the dependence on l is an emergent consequence of the modified geometry rather than a definitional identity or self-referential fit. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation, ansatz smuggled via prior work, or renaming of a known result. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the low-energy Hořava gravity metric with LV parameter l, the thin-disk approximation, and the accuracy of numerical photon geodesics; no independent verification of these elements is provided in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • l
    Lorentz violation parameter varied across positive and negative values to produce the reported changes in shadow shape and angular velocity.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The spacetime metric and geodesic equations follow from the low-energy limit of Hořava gravity with Lorentz violation parameter l
    Invoked as the theoretical framework for the black hole solutions and photon propagation.
  • domain assumption The thin accretion disk model and ZAMO observer framework adequately represent the physical system
    Used to set up the ray-tracing and image formation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1500 out tokens · 55572 ms · 2026-05-17T04:59:00.343418+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Polarized Radiative Transfer of Kerr-Newman Black Hole

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A general ODE numerical method for polarized photon transport in Kerr-Newman spacetime shows that increasing black hole charge compresses and distorts EVPA structures on photon-ring scales.

  2. Reshaping the inner shadow of a Kerr black hole by a torn accretion disk

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Torn accretion disks around Kerr black holes erode the inner shadow and create bifurcated, crescent, and multi-ring shadow features driven by sub-disk discontinuities and outer tilt angle.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    B. P. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116no. 6, (2016) 061102

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875no. 1, (2019) L4

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) L1

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric,

    K. Akiyama et al., “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930no. 2, (2022) L17

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    The Escape of Photons from Gravitationally Intense Stars,

    J. L. Synge, “The Escape of Photons from Gravitationally Intense Stars,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.131no. 3, (1966) 463–466

    work page 1966

  6. [6]

    Timelike and null geodesics in the kerr metric,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Timelike and null geodesics in the kerr metric,” in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus), pp. 215–240. 1973.https://inspirehep.net/literature/160981

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    Measurement of the kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object’s shadow,

    K. Hioki and K.-i. Maeda, “Measurement of the kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object’s shadow,” Phys. Rev. D80no. 2, (2009) 024042

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Testing the No-Hair Theorem with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum: II. Black-Hole Images,

    T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, “Testing the No-Hair Theorem with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum: II. Black-Hole Images,” Astrophys. J.718(2010) 446–454

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Shadow and Deflection Angle of Rotating Black Holes in Perfect Fluid Dark Matter with a Cosmological Constant,

    S. Haroon, M. Jamil, K. Jusufi, K. Lin, and R. B. Mann, “Shadow and Deflection Angle of Rotating Black Holes in Perfect Fluid Dark Matter with a Cosmological Constant,” Phys. Rev. D99no. 4, (2019) 044015

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Identification of a Regular Black Hole by Its Shadow,

    I. Dymnikova and K. Kraav, “Identification of a Regular Black Hole by Its Shadow,” Universe5no. 7, (2019) 163

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Shadow cast and deflection of light by charged rotating regular black holes,

    R. Kumar, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Wang, “Shadow cast and deflection of light by charged rotating regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D100no. 12, (2019) 124024. 22

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Rotating black holes in 4DEinstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its shadow,

    R. Kumar and S. G. Ghosh, “Rotating black holes in 4DEinstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its shadow,” JCAP07(2020) 053

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Determining parameters of Kerr black holes at finite distance by shadow observation,

    K. Hioki and U. Miyamoto, “Determining parameters of Kerr black holes at finite distance by shadow observation,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 4, (2024) 044030

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Constraints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT observations of M87*,

    P. Kocherlakota et al., “Constraints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT observations of M87*,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 10, (2021) 104047

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Testing Horndeski Gravity from EHT Observational Results for Rotating Black Holes,

    M. Afrin and S. G. Ghosh, “Testing Horndeski Gravity from EHT Observational Results for Rotating Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.932no. 1, (2022) 51

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Strong gravitational lensing and shadow constraint from M87* of slowly rotating Kerr-like black hole,

    X.-M. Kuang and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, “Strong gravitational lensing and shadow constraint from M87* of slowly rotating Kerr-like black hole,” Annals Phys.447(2022) 169147

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Influence of quantum correction on black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings,

    J. Peng, M. Guo, and X.-H. Feng, “Influence of quantum correction on black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings,” Chin. Phys. C45no. 8, (2021) 085103

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Photon rings of spherically symmetric black holes and robust tests of non-Kerr metrics,

    M. Wielgus, “Photon rings of spherically symmetric black holes and robust tests of non-Kerr metrics,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 12, (2021) 124058

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Photon ring and observational appearance of a hairy black hole,

    Q. Gan, P. Wang, H. Wu, and H. Yang, “Photon ring and observational appearance of a hairy black hole,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 4, (2021) 044049

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Observational signature and additional photon rings of an asymmetric thin-shell wormhole,

    J. Peng, M. Guo, and X.-H. Feng, “Observational signature and additional photon rings of an asymmetric thin-shell wormhole,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 12, (2021) 124010

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Holographic images of a charged black hole in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity,

    X.-X. Zeng, L.-F. Li, P. Li, B. Liang, and P. Xu, “Holographic images of a charged black hole in Lorentz symmetry breaking massive gravity,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68 no. 2, (2025) 220412

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Photon rings in a holographic toy model,

    S. Detournay, S. Kanuri, A. Lupsasca, P. Spindel, Q. Vandermiers, and R. Wutte, “Photon rings in a holographic toy model,” JHEP10(2025) 229

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Holography of the photon ring,

    S. Hadar, D. Kapec, A. Lupsasca, and A. Strominger, “Holography of the photon ring,” Class. Quant. Grav.39no. 21, (2022) 215001

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Shadows and photon spheres with spherical accretions in the four-dimensional Gauss–Bonnet black hole,

    X.-X. Zeng, H.-Q. Zhang, and H. Zhang, “Shadows and photon spheres with spherical accretions in the four-dimensional Gauss–Bonnet black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C80no. 9, (2020) 872

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Photon spheres and spherical accretion image of a hairy black hole,

    Q. Gan, P. Wang, H. Wu, and H. Yang, “Photon spheres and spherical accretion image of a hairy black hole,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 2, (2021) 024003. 23

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Images from disk and spherical accretions of hairy Schwarzschild black holes,

    Y. Meng, X.-M. Kuang, X.-J. Wang, B. Wang, and J.-P. Wu, “Images from disk and spherical accretions of hairy Schwarzschild black holes,” Phys. Rev. D108no. 6, (2023) 064013

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Thin accretion disks in f(R) modified gravity models,

    C. S. J. Pun, Z. Kovacs, and T. Harko, “Thin accretion disks in f(R) modified gravity models,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 024043

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Thin accretion disk onto slowly rotating black holes in Einstein-Æther theory,

    C. Liu, S. Yang, Q. Wu, and T. Zhu, “Thin accretion disk onto slowly rotating black holes in Einstein-Æther theory,” JCAP02no. 02, (2022) 034

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    The shadows and observational appearance of a noncommutative black hole surrounded by various profiles of accretions,

    X.-X. Zeng, G.-P. Li, and K.-J. He, “The shadows and observational appearance of a noncommutative black hole surrounded by various profiles of accretions,” Nucl. Phys. B 974(2022) 115639

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Probing a non-linear electrodynamics black hole with thin accretion disk, shadow, and deflection angle with M87* and Sgr A* from EHT,

    A. Uniyal, R. C. Pantig, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, “Probing a non-linear electrodynamics black hole with thin accretion disk, shadow, and deflection angle with M87* and Sgr A* from EHT,” Phys. Dark Univ.40(2023) 101178

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Thin accretion disc luminosity and its image around rotating black holes in perfect fluid dark matter,

    M. Heydari-Fard, S. G. Honarvar, and M. Heydari-Fard, “Thin accretion disc luminosity and its image around rotating black holes in perfect fluid dark matter,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.521no. 1, (2023) 708–716

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Shadow images of Ghosh-Kumar rotating black hole illuminated by spherical light sources and thin accretion disks,

    C.-Y. Yang, M. I. Aslam, X.-X. Zeng, and R. Saleem, “Shadow images of Ghosh-Kumar rotating black hole illuminated by spherical light sources and thin accretion disks,” JHEAp46(2025) 345

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Image of the Kerr–Newman Black Hole Surrounded by a Thin Accretion Disk,

    S. Guo, Y.-X. Huang, E.-W. Liang, Y. Liang, Q.-Q. Jiang, and K. Lin, “Image of the Kerr–Newman Black Hole Surrounded by a Thin Accretion Disk,” Astrophys. J.975 no. 2, (2024) 237

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Images of Kerr-MOG black holes surrounded by geometrically thick magnetized equilibrium tori,

    Z. Zhang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, “Images of Kerr-MOG black holes surrounded by geometrically thick magnetized equilibrium tori,” JCAP09(2024) 027

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Imaging thick accretion disks and jets surrounding black holes,

    Z. Zhang, Y. Hou, M. Guo, and B. Chen, “Imaging thick accretion disks and jets surrounding black holes,” JCAP05(2024) 032

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    A new analytical model of magnetofluids surrounding rotating black holes,

    Y. Hou, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, and B. Chen, “A new analytical model of magnetofluids surrounding rotating black holes,” JCAP02(2024) 030

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings,

    S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz, and R. M. Wald, “Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings,” Phys. Rev. D100no. 2, (2019) 024018. 24

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Thin Accretion Disk around a four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Black Hole,

    C. Liu, T. Zhu, and Q. Wu, “Thin Accretion Disk around a four-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Black Hole,” Chin. Phys. C45no. 1, (2021) 015105

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Image of the thin accretion disk around compact objects in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity,

    G. Gyulchev, P. Nedkova, T. Vetsov, and S. Yazadjiev, “Image of the thin accretion disk around compact objects in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C81 no. 10, (2021) 885

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Observational appearances of af (r) global monopole black hole illuminated by various accretions,

    G.-P. Li and K.-J. He, “Observational appearances of af (r) global monopole black hole illuminated by various accretions,” Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 11, (2021) 1018

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk,

    Y. Hou, Z. Zhang, H. Yan, M. Guo, and B. Chen, “Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 6, (2022) 064058

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Accretion disk for regular black holes with sub-Planckian curvature,

    W. Zeng, Y. Ling, Q.-Q. Jiang, and G.-P. Li, “Accretion disk for regular black holes with sub-Planckian curvature,” Phys. Rev. D108no. 10, (2023) 104072

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Thin accretion disk images of rotating hairy Horndeski black holes,

    M. Heydari-Fard, M. Heydari-Fard, and N. Riazi, “Thin accretion disk images of rotating hairy Horndeski black holes,” Astrophys. Space Sci.369no. 9, (2024) 96

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Radiative properties and images of the rotating short-hairy black hole surrounded by a thin accretion disk,

    S.-Q. Liu and J.-H. Huang, “Radiative properties and images of the rotating short-hairy black hole surrounded by a thin accretion disk,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 6, (2025) 064090

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Imaging compact boson stars with hot spots and thin accretion disks,

    J. L. Rosa, C. F. B. Macedo, and D. Rubiera-Garcia, “Imaging compact boson stars with hot spots and thin accretion disks,” Phys. Rev. D108no. 4, (2023) 044021

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Light ring images of double photon spheres in black hole and wormhole spacetimes,

    M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and D. G´ omez S´ aez-Chill´ on, “Light ring images of double photon spheres in black hole and wormhole spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 105no. 8, (2022) 084057

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Shadows of boson and Proca stars with thin accretion disks,

    J. L. Rosa and D. Rubiera-Garcia, “Shadows of boson and Proca stars with thin accretion disks,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 8, (2022) 084004. [48]Event Horizon T elescopeCollaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring,” Astrophys. J. Lett.910no. 1, (2021) L12

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Polarized image of synchrotron radiations of hotspots in Schwarzschilld-Melvin black hole spacetime,

    H. Zhu and M. Guo, “Polarized image of synchrotron radiations of hotspots in Schwarzschilld-Melvin black hole spacetime,”arXiv:2205.04777 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Polarized images of synchrotron radiations in curved spacetime,

    Z. Hu, Y. Hou, H. Yan, M. Guo, and B. Chen, “Polarized images of synchrotron radiations in curved spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 12, (2022) 1166. 25

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Black Hole Polarimetry I. A Signature of Electromagnetic Energy Extraction,

    A. Chael, A. Lupsasca, G. N. Wong, and E. Quataert, “Black Hole Polarimetry I. A Signature of Electromagnetic Energy Extraction,” Astrophys. J.958no. 1, (2023) 65

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Polarized image of a Schwarzschild black hole with a thin accretion disk as photon couples to Weyl tensor,

    Z. Zhang, S. Chen, X. Qin, and J. Jing, “Polarized image of a Schwarzschild black hole with a thin accretion disk as photon couples to Weyl tensor,” Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 11, (2021) 991

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Polarized images of charged particles in vortical motions around a magnetized Kerr black hole,

    Z. Zhang, Y. Hou, Z. Hu, M. Guo, and B. Chen, “Polarized images of charged particles in vortical motions around a magnetized Kerr black hole,” JCAP03(2024) 013

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Polarized image of a rotating black hole surrounded by a cold dark matter halo,

    X. Qin, S. Chen, Z. Zhang, and J. Jing, “Polarized image of a rotating black hole surrounded by a cold dark matter halo,” Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 2, (2023) 159

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Observational features of massive boson stars with thin disk accretion,

    G.-P. Li, M.-Q. Wu, K.-J. He, and Q.-Q. Jiang, “Observational features of massive boson stars with thin disk accretion,”arXiv:2505.14734 [gr-qc]. [56]Event Horizon T elescopeCollaboration, K. Akiyama et al., “The Polarized Image of a Synchrotron-emitting Ring of Gas Orbiting a Black Hole,” Astrophys. J.912no. 1, (2021) 35

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Polarized image of equatorial emission in the Kerr geometry,

    Z. Gelles, E. Himwich, D. C. M. Palumbo, and M. D. Johnson, “Polarized image of equatorial emission in the Kerr geometry,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 4, (2021) 044060

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Observational signatures and polarized images of rotating charged black holes in Kalb-Ramond Gravity,

    C.-Y. Yang, K.-J. He, X.-X. Zeng, and L.-F. Li, “Observational signatures and polarized images of rotating charged black holes in Kalb-Ramond Gravity,”arXiv:2508.07393 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,

    V. A. Kostelecky, “Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 69(2004) 105009

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model,

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kosteleck´ y, “Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 116002

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    Exact schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,

    R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F. P. Poulis, and E. B. Santos, “Exact schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 104001

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Black holes with a cosmological constant in bumblebee gravity,

    R. V. Maluf and J. C. S. Neves, “Black holes with a cosmological constant in bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 044002

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Static and spherically symmetric black holes in gravity with a background kalb-ramond field,

    K. Yang, Y.-Z. Chen, Z.-Q. Duan, and J.-Y. Zhao, “Static and spherically symmetric black holes in gravity with a background kalb-ramond field,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 124004. 26

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Electrically charged black holes in gravity with a background Kalb–Ramond field,

    Z.-Q. Duan, J.-Y. Zhao, and K. Yang, “Electrically charged black holes in gravity with a background Kalb–Ramond field,” Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 8, (2024) 798

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Static neutral black holes in kalb-ramond gravity,

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, “Static neutral black holes in kalb-ramond gravity,” JCAP2024no. 09, (2024) 017

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Exploring antisymmetric tensor effects on black hole shadows and quasinormal frequencies,

    A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J. Reis, and H. Hassanabadi, “Exploring antisymmetric tensor effects on black hole shadows and quasinormal frequencies,” JCAP2024no. 05, (2024) 029

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Exact black hole solutions in gravity with a background Kalb-Ramond field,

    J.-Z. Liu, S.-P. Wu, S.-W. Wei, and Y.-X. Liu, “Exact black hole solutions in gravity with a background Kalb-Ramond field,” JCAP11(2025) 056

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Gravitational lensing of a Schwarzschild-like black hole in Kalb-Ramond gravity,

    E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. D. da Silva, and H. A. Vieira, “Gravitational lensing of a Schwarzschild-like black hole in Kalb-Ramond gravity,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 2, (2024) 024077

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Probing the Lorentz Invariance Violation via Gravitational Lensing and Analytical Eigenmodes of Perturbed Slowly Rotating Bumblebee Black Holes,

    M. Mangut, H. G¨ ursel, S. Kanzi, and ˙I. Sakallı, “Probing the Lorentz Invariance Violation via Gravitational Lensing and Analytical Eigenmodes of Perturbed Slowly Rotating Bumblebee Black Holes,” Universe9no. 5, (2023) 225

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    Shadow of slowly rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes,

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, “Shadow of slowly rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes,” JCAP05(2025) 017

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    Lorentz violation signatures in the low-energy sector of Hoˇ rava gravity from black hole shadow observations,

    W. Liu, H. Huang, D. Wu, and J. Wang, “Lorentz violation signatures in the low-energy sector of Hoˇ rava gravity from black hole shadow observations,”Phys. Lett. B868 (2025) 139812

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Quasinormal modes, greybody factors, and Hawking radiation sparsity of black holes influenced by a global monopole charge in Kalb-Ramond gravity,

    A. Baruah et al., “Quasinormal modes, greybody factors, and Hawking radiation sparsity of black holes influenced by a global monopole charge in Kalb-Ramond gravity,” JCAP08(2025) 023

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Quasinormal frequencies for a black hole in a bumblebee gravity,

    R. Oliveira, D. M. Dantas, and C. A. S. Almeida, “Quasinormal frequencies for a black hole in a bumblebee gravity,” EPL135no. 1, (2021) 10003

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Quasinormal modes and bounding greybody factors of GUP-corrected black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity,

    A. Baruah, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, and A. Deshamukhya, “Quasinormal modes and bounding greybody factors of GUP-corrected black holes in Kalb–Ramond gravity,” Annals Phys. 455(2023) 169393

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Rotating black holes in a viable Lorentz-violating gravity: finding exact solutions without tears,

    D. O. Devecioglu and M.-I. Park, “Rotating black holes in a viable Lorentz-violating gravity: finding exact solutions without tears,” Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 8, (2024) 852. 27

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon,

    A. Chael, M. D. Johnson, and A. Lupsasca, “Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon,” Astrophys. J.918no. 1, (2021) 6

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    Probing Non-rotating Black Hole in Kalb-Ramond Gravity: Imaging and Polarized Signatures Surrounded by Different Thick Accretion Flows,

    X.-X. Zeng, C.-Y. Yang, M. I. Aslam, and R. Saleem, “Probing Non-rotating Black Hole in Kalb-Ramond Gravity: Imaging and Polarized Signatures Surrounded by Different Thick Accretion Flows,”arXiv:2511.00586 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point,

    P. Hoˇ rava, “Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 084008

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    The shadow and observational images of the non-singular rotating black holes in loop quantum gravity,

    G.-P. Li, H.-B. Zheng, K.-J. He, and Q.-Q. Jiang, “The shadow and observational images of the non-singular rotating black holes in loop quantum gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 3, (2025) 249

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    Relativistic transport theory,

    R. W. Lindquist, “Relativistic transport theory,” Annals Phys.37no. 3, (1966) 487–518. 28

    work page 1966