pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.18012 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Shocked Wind Interpretation of an Odd Radio Circle

Alison L. Coil , David S. N. Rupke , Serena Perrotta , Saloni Agrawal , Cassandra Lochhaas
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Odd Radio CirclesORC4shock ionizationionized gasradio ringsgalaxy kinematicsemission line ratios
0
0 comments X

The pith

The ionized gas around the central galaxy of ORC4 is produced by shocks from the event that formed its large radio ring.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

New integral field spectroscopy maps multiple optical emission lines across the central galaxy of the isolated Odd Radio Circle ORC4. The data show that [OII] is the dominant line and extends farthest, while the full set of line ratios fits shock models at 200-300 km/s far better than stellar or AGN photoionization. Kinematics are asymmetric with steep velocity gradients and dispersions near 200 km/s. These properties indicate the gas was shock-heated, mixed, and cooled by the same large-scale event that produced the surrounding radio ring. A sympathetic reader would therefore see the optical gas as a direct tracer of the unknown process that creates ORCs.

Core claim

Keck/KCWI+KCRM spectroscopy of ORC4 reveals spatially extended ionized gas whose emission-line ratios are best reproduced by shock models with velocities of 200-300 km/s and whose kinematics exhibit strong spatial asymmetries, velocity gradients exceeding 100 km/s, and dispersions of approximately 200 km/s. These measurements are inconsistent with stellar or AGN photoionization and instead indicate that the gas results from shock ionization, mixing, and cooling tied to the energetic event that created the large-scale radio ring.

What carries the argument

Shock ionization models applied to spatially resolved optical emission-line ratios and velocity fields in the central galaxy.

If this is right

  • The radio ring is the observable remnant of an energetic event whose shocks also heat and ionize gas inside the central galaxy.
  • ORC central galaxies contain cooled, shock-processed gas rather than gas ionized by ongoing star formation or nuclear activity.
  • Similar shock signatures should appear in the central galaxies of other isolated ORCs if the same formation channel operates.
  • The optical emission can be used to trace the energy and geometry of the ORC-forming event on scales of tens of kiloparsecs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same shocked-wind picture may unify the radio morphology and optical properties across the growing sample of ORCs.
  • High-resolution radio and X-ray imaging could test whether the shock front coincides with the inner edge of the radio ring.
  • If the shocks are driven by an outflow, the implied mass and energy loading would constrain the progenitor event to a major merger or powerful AGN episode.
  • Time-dependent cooling models could predict how long the optical emission remains visible after the radio ring forms.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed line ratios cannot be produced by AGN or stellar photoionization and that the gas kinematics are caused by the same event that formed the radio ring.

What would settle it

Deeper spectroscopy or kinematic mapping that shows dominant AGN or stellar photoionization signatures, or velocity fields with no spatial or dynamical connection to the radio ring.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.18012 by Alison L. Coil, Cassandra Lochhaas, David S. N. Rupke, Saloni Agrawal, Serena Perrotta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spatially-integrated optical spectrum of the ORC4 central galaxy, showing stellar and line emission integrated in a circular aperture of 2′′ diameter centered on the galaxy. The upper panel shows the spectra from both the blue and red arms of KCWI+KCRM (in black), while the lower panel shows the KCRM spectrum in greater detail. The gap in wavelength coverage from ∼3900-4700 ˚A is intentional (see text for … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Combined stellar continuum and emission line fits (in red, upper panels) showing [O ii], [O iii], Hβ, [N i], [O i], [N ii] Hα, and [S ii] in the central spaxel of the ORC4 central galaxy. The data are shown in black. The lower panels show the stellar continuum fit after subtracting the line emission, shown with dotted pink lines, and cyan regions indicate the wavelengths used to identify and fit the emissi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Surface brightness map of the stellar con￾tinuum emission in the ORC4 central galaxy, integrated over the observed wavelength range 7600˚A− 9000˚A. Con￾tours show surface brightness levels of 20, 40, and 60 × 10−16 erg s−1 cm−2 arcsec−2 . line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Surface brightness maps of six of the strongest emission lines in the ORC4 central galaxy; spaxels with S/N > 3 are shown. The upper left panel shows emission from the [O ii] doublet, while the rest of the panels show emission from single lines. Contours show surface brightness levels of 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 × 10−16 ergs−1 cm−2 arcsec−2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Surface brightness radial profiles are shown for the [O ii] doublet, Hα, [S ii] doublet, [N ii] 6583˚A, Hβ, and [O iii] 5007˚A emission lines, as a function of distance from the center of the ORC4 central galaxy. Figures 3 and 4 show surface brightness maps of the stellar continuum in the ORC4 central galaxy, along with emission from several strong lines. Only spaxels with S/N > 3 are displayed. North is u… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Restframe equivalenth width (EW) spatial maps of three of the strongest optical emission lines in the ORC4 central galaxy; the left panel shows the EW for the [O ii] doublet. The color bar range is unique for each line; [O ii] has the highest restframe EW (in units of ˚A), followed by Hα. detected beyond a radius of 9 kpc due to a sky line, which makes the fits unreliable at lower S/N. While most lines are… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The central velocity, V50, measured in each spaxel for the [O ii] doublet (left), [O iii] 5007 ˚A (middle), and Hα (right) emission lines. As discussed in the text, the kinematics of fits to the [O ii] line are not tied to those of the redder optical emission lines, while the kinematics of the [O iii] and Hα lines are tied by the emission line fitting procedure and thus agree by design. °15 °10 °5 0 5 10 1… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The central velocity, V50, measured along a north-south cut through the center of each map shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The velocity dispersion, σ, measured in each spaxel for the [O ii] doublet (left), [O iii] 5007 ˚A (middle), and Hα (right) emission lines. The color bar range is identical in all three panels, spanning 0 to 300 km s−1 . While the kinematics of the [O ii] doublet are not tied to the kinematics of [O iii] or Hα, the spatial σ maps look very similar. -15.0 0.0 15.0 kpc -15.0 0.0 15.0 kpc [NII] 6583 A/H ˚ a 0… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Spatial maps of six common strong line ratios: [O iii] 5007 ˚A/ Hβ (upper left), [N ii] 6583 ˚A/ Hα (upper center), [S ii] 6716 + 6731 ˚A/ Hα (upper right), [O i] 6300 ˚A/ Hα (lower left), [N ii] 6583 ˚A/ [S ii] 6716 + 6731 ˚A(lower center), and [O iii] 5007 ˚A/ [O ii] 3727 ˚A doublet (lower right), corrected for dust extinction in the ORC4 central galaxy. The color bar varies in each panel, to highlight … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Strong emission line flux ratio diagrams: [O III]/Hβ versus [N II]/Hα (upper left), [O III]/Hβ versus [S II]/Hα (upper right), [O III]/Hβ versus [O I]/Hα (lower left), and [O III]/[O II] versus [N II]/[S II] (lower right). The blue points with error bars show spaxels in the ORC4 central galaxy, not corrected for dust extinction. The green lines show commonly-used demarcations for starburst versus AGN vers… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: A comparison of the extinction-corrected line ratio diagrams from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: A comparison of extinction-corrected line ratio diagrams for the ORC4 central galaxy with fast radiative shocks models of Allen et al. (2008) for solar metallicity and a pre-shock gas density n = 0.1 cm−3 . As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: A comparison of extinction-corrected line ratio diagrams for the ORC4 central galaxy with the Allen et al. (2008) shocks models for solar metallicty and a pre-shock gas density n = 1 cm−3 . As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: A comparison of extinction-corrected line ratio diagrams for the ORC4 central galaxy with the Allen et al. (2008) shocks models for twice solar metallicty and a pre-shock gas density n = 1 cm−3 . radiatively cool to produce gas emission on the scale of the galaxy. The forward shock can continue towards larger scales and create the synchrotron emission that results in the large-scale radio ring. With the n… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Odd Radio Circles (ORCs) are a new class of extragalactic object, with large rings of faint radio continuum emission typically spanning 100s of kpc; their origins are unknown. Previous optical spectroscopy of the central galaxy in ORC4, a classic isolated ORC, revealed spatially-extended ionized gas with strong [OII] emission and line ratios consistent with LINER emission. We present new Keck/KCWI+KCRM integral field spectroscopy covering multiple strong optical emission lines to measure the extent, morphology, and spatially-resolved kinematics and line ratios of the ionized and neutral gas in the ORC4 central galaxy. We find that [OII] is the strongest optical emission line in this massive, old galaxy, and the [OII] emission is detected to larger radial extent than the other optical lines. The gas kinematics show strong spatial asymmetries, high velocity gradients (>100 km/s), and high velocity dispersion (~200 km/s). The emission line ratios are most consistent with shock models with shock velocities of ~200-300 km/s and are not fit well by stellar or AGN photoionization models. These findings are consistent with a model in which the gas in the ORC4 central galaxy is the result of shock ionization in and around the central galaxy, likely due to mixing and cooling of gas associated with the event that created the large-scale radio ring of emission that identified this source as an ORC.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents new Keck/KCWI integral field spectroscopy of the central galaxy in ORC4, revealing extended [OII] emission to larger radii than other lines, strong kinematic asymmetries with velocity gradients >100 km/s and dispersions ~200 km/s, and emission line ratios best matched by shock models at 200-300 km/s rather than stellar or AGN photoionization. The authors interpret the gas as arising from shock ionization due to mixing and cooling tied to the event that formed the large-scale radio ring.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, the work supplies spatially resolved evidence linking central ionized gas properties to ORC formation via shocks, moving beyond single-aperture data and offering a testable physical scenario for these radio structures. The combination of kinematics and line-ratio diagnostics provides a concrete observational anchor for models of ORC origins.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion] Discussion/interpretation section: the claim that the central gas results from mixing/cooling associated with the radio-ring event is load-bearing for the title and abstract conclusion, yet the KCWI data show only local consistency with 200-300 km/s shocks; no velocity continuity, outflow alignment, or energy/momentum match is demonstrated across the ~100 kpc scales separating the central galaxy from the ring.
  2. [Results] Results section on line ratios: the statement that ratios 'are not fit well by stellar or AGN photoionization models' requires explicit reporting of the model grids (e.g., MAPPINGS or CLOUDY references), fitting procedure, and quantitative metrics such as reduced chi-squared or Bayesian evidence to substantiate that shocks are preferred over alternatives.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: specify the maximum observed velocity gradient and its spatial location rather than the inequality '>100 km/s' to allow direct comparison with the reported dispersion.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and methods: include error bars on all line-ratio diagrams and state the exact shock-velocity grid spacing used in the model comparisons.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and rigor in the presentation of our results and interpretation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion/interpretation section: the claim that the central gas results from mixing/cooling associated with the radio-ring event is load-bearing for the title and abstract conclusion, yet the KCWI data show only local consistency with 200-300 km/s shocks; no velocity continuity, outflow alignment, or energy/momentum match is demonstrated across the ~100 kpc scales separating the central galaxy from the ring.

    Authors: We agree that the KCWI observations provide spatially resolved evidence only within the central galaxy and do not directly demonstrate velocity continuity, outflow alignment, or an energy/momentum balance across the full ~100 kpc to the radio ring. Our interpretation rests on the local consistency of the observed kinematics (velocity gradients >100 km/s, dispersions ~200 km/s) and line ratios with 200-300 km/s shock models, together with the established association of the central galaxy with ORC4. In the revised manuscript we have softened the language in the discussion, abstract, and title to present this as a plausible physical scenario supported by the local data rather than a definitively established causal link. We have added explicit caveats noting the absence of direct cross-scale connections and the value of future multi-scale observations. This preserves the core scientific contribution while accurately reflecting the scope of the current dataset. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section on line ratios: the statement that ratios 'are not fit well by stellar or AGN photoionization models' requires explicit reporting of the model grids (e.g., MAPPINGS or CLOUDY references), fitting procedure, and quantitative metrics such as reduced chi-squared or Bayesian evidence to substantiate that shocks are preferred over alternatives.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. In the revised Results section we now explicitly cite the MAPPINGS shock grids and the CLOUDY photoionization grids employed, describe the fitting procedure (including how line ratios were extracted and compared), and report quantitative metrics such as reduced chi-squared values for the shock models versus the stellar and AGN photoionization alternatives. These additions substantiate that the shock models provide a statistically preferred description of the observed ratios. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; interpretation rests on external shock model comparisons.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that KCWI observations of extended [OII] emission, high velocity gradients (>100 km/s), dispersion (~200 km/s), and line ratios in the ORC4 central galaxy are most consistent with shock models (velocities 200-300 km/s) rather than stellar or AGN photoionization. This comparison uses standard literature shock models as an external benchmark, with the link to the large-scale radio ring presented explicitly as a 'consistent model' rather than a derived or fitted prediction. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The causal connection across scales is interpretive and lacks direct dynamical evidence, but this is an evidentiary limitation, not a reduction of the result to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim applies established shock ionization models from prior literature to new observational data; the only fitted element is the shock velocity range needed to match line ratios.

free parameters (1)
  • shock velocity = 200-300 km/s
    Range of 200-300 km/s selected to match observed emission line ratios and kinematics.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Optical emission line ratios can reliably distinguish shock ionization from stellar or AGN photoionization
    Standard assumption in astrophysical emission-line diagnostics invoked to prefer shock models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5570 in / 1412 out tokens · 54196 ms · 2026-05-16T20:30:36.156249+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Compact Radio Ring with a Diffuse Envelope in LOFAR: Odd Radio Circle or Distinct Phenomenon?

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    J1248+4826 is a newly identified compact ORC candidate with a ~30 kpc ring radius and ~200 kpc total extent at assumed z=0.2, consistent with the ORC population but with the host galaxy on the ring edge and no ongoing...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    G., Groves, B

    Allen, M. G., Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2008, ApJS, 178, 20, doi: 10.1086/589652 Astropy Collaboration. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 —. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f —. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  2. [2]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    D., Netzer, H., Woltjer, L., Courvoisier, T

    Blandford, R. D., Netzer, H., Woltjer, L., Courvoisier, T. J.-L., & Mayor, M., eds. 1990, Active Galactic Nuclei

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    M., Stanway, E

    Byrne, C. M., Stanway, E. R., Eldridge, J. J., McSwiney, L., & Townsend, O. T. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 5329, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac807

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac807 2022

  5. [5]

    2012, pPXF: Penalized Pixel-Fitting stellar kinematics extraction

    Cappellari, M. 2012, pPXF: Penalized Pixel-Fitting stellar kinematics extraction. http://ascl.net/1210.002 —. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3020 2012

  6. [6]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900 Cid Fernandes, R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1036, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16185.x

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  7. [7]

    L., et al

    Coil, A. L., et al. 2024, Nature, 625, 459, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06752-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06752-8 2024

  8. [8]

    M., Koribalski, B

    Dolag, K., B¨ oss, L. M., Koribalski, B. S., Steinwandel, U. P., & Valentini, M. 2023, ApJ, 945, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5f5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb5f5 2023

  9. [9]

    B., & Bryan, G

    Fielding, D. B., & Bryan, G. L. 2022, ApJ, 924, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f41 Filipovi´ c, M. D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 265, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac210

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f41 2022

  10. [10]

    Gronke, M., & Oh, S. P. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 1970, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3332

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3332 2020

  11. [11]

    A., Dopita, M

    Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., & Sutherland, R. S. 2004, ApJS, 153, 9, doi: 10.1086/421113

    work page doi:10.1086/421113 2004

  12. [12]

    2022, PASA, 39, e051, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2022.44

    Gupta, N., et al. 2022, PASA, 39, e051, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2022.44

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.44 2022

  13. [13]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  14. [14]

    2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    Kauffmann, G., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  15. [15]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  16. [16]

    B., Edwards , R

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x 2006

  17. [17]

    S., et al

    Koribalski, B. S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, L11, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slab041 —. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.11784, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.11784 —. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 3357, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1254

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slab041 2021

  18. [18]

    A., Dasyra, K

    Koutsoumpou, E., Fern´ andez-Ontiveros, J. A., Dasyra, K. M., & Spinoglio, L. 2025, A&A, 693, A215, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452232

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452232 2025

  19. [19]

    A., Quataert, E., & Weinberg, D

    Lochhaas, C., Thompson, T. A., Quataert, E., & Weinberg, D. H. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1873, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2421

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2421 2018

  20. [20]

    Shabala, S. S. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1439, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad074

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad074 2023

  21. [21]

    Markwardt, C. B. 2009, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 411, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, ed. D. A

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Non-linear Least Squares Fitting in IDL with MPFIT

    Bohlender, D. Durand, & P. Dowler, 251, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0902.2850

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0902.2850

  23. [23]

    2016, PASA, 33, e042, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2016.37

    McConnell, D., et al. 2016, PASA, 33, e042, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2016.37

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2016.37 2016

  24. [24]

    C., et al

    McGurk, R. C., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 13096, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, ed. J. J. Bryant, K. Motohara, & J. R. D. Vernet, 1309647, doi: 10.1117/12.3020646

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3020646 2024

  25. [25]

    2018, ApJ, 864, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad597

    Morrissey, P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad597

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad597 2018

  26. [26]

    P., et al

    Norris, R. P., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e003, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2020.52 —. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1300, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac701 —. 2025, MNRAS, 537, L42, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slae114

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.52 2021

  27. [27]

    2023, ApJ, 949, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc660 —

    Perrotta, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc660 —. 2024, ApJ, 975, 263, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b0c 18 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc660 2023

  28. [28]

    K., Montenegro, M., Nahar, S

    Pradhan, A. K., Montenegro, M., Nahar, S. N., & Eissner, W. 2006, MNRAS, 366, L6, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00119.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00119.x 2006

  29. [29]

    A., Kewley, L

    Rich, J. A., Kewley, L. J., & Dopita, M. A. 2011, ApJ, 734, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/87

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/734/2/87 2011

  30. [30]

    Rupke, D. S. N. 2014, IFSRED: Data Reduction for Integral Field Spectrographs, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1409.004

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Rupke, D. S. N., G¨ ultekin, K., & Veilleux, S. 2017, ApJ, 850, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa94d1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa94d1 2017

  32. [32]

    Rupke, D. S. N., et al. 2019, Nature, 574, 643, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1686-1 —. 2023, ApJ, 947, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbfae —. 2024, ApJ, 967, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3934

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1686-1 2019

  33. [33]

    S., et al

    Shabala, S. S., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e024, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.11

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.11 2024

  34. [34]

    R., & Eldridge, J

    Stanway, E. R., & Eldridge, J. J. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 75, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1353 Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1353 2018

  35. [35]

    Veilleux, S., & Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, ApJS, 63, 295

    work page 1987

  36. [36]

    C., & Li, Z

    Yamasaki, S., Sarkar, K. C., & Li, Z. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3854, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae281

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae281 2024

  37. [37]

    2006, ApJ, 648, 281, doi: 10.1086/505629

    Yan, R., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 281, doi: 10.1086/505629

    work page doi:10.1086/505629 2006