pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.20553 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-23 · 🌀 gr-qc

Eckart heat-flux applicability in F(Φ,X)R theories and the existence of temperature gradients

David S. Pereira , Jos\'e Pedro Mimoso This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords scalar-tensor theoriesEckart heat fluxnonminimal couplingHorndeskieffective fluidtemperature gradientsmodified gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Requiring an Eckart heat flux for all scalar configurations is possible only if the nonminimal coupling F depends solely on the scalar field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In single-scalar theories with Lagrangian L = F(Φ, X)R + G(Φ, X), a dependence of F on the kinetic term X creates an extra transverse term in the effective heat flux within the scalar-comoving frame. This term, proportional to (F_X / 8π F) V_⊥a, generally cannot be expressed as a temperature gradient and thus prevents the flux from matching the Eckart constitutive relation. An Eckart heat flux holds for arbitrary timelike scalar fields if and only if F_X vanishes identically, reducing F to a function of Φ alone and yielding a subclass of Horndeski theories. Consequently, only Jordan-like models with F = F(Φ) support a global Eckart fluid picture of the scalar sector, while others are limited to highly symmetric backgrounds.

Core claim

In single-scalar theories of the form L = F(Φ,X)R + G(Φ,X), a generic nonminimal coupling F(Φ,X) induces an additional transverse contribution to the effective heat flux, proportional to (F_X/8πF) V_⊥a, in the scalar-comoving frame. This term cannot in general be written as a spatial temperature gradient. Therefore, an Eckart heat flux q_a = -K(D_a T_g + T_g a_a) is possible for all timelike scalar configurations if and only if F_X(Φ,X)≡0, i.e. F(Φ,X)=F(Φ), resulting in a subclass of Horndeski theories. Only Jordan-like theories admit a global Eckart fluid picture, while models with F_X≠0 recover it only on highly symmetric backgrounds.

What carries the argument

The transverse component V_⊥a of V_a = h_a^c ∇_c ∇_d X u^d appearing in the effective heat flux when F depends on X.

If this is right

  • Theories with F_X ≠ 0 cannot maintain an Eckart heat flux interpretation on generic timelike scalar configurations.
  • Only F(Φ) allows the scalar sector to be described as an Eckart fluid for arbitrary backgrounds.
  • On highly symmetric backgrounds, the transverse term vanishes, allowing Eckart-like form even for F_X ≠ 0.
  • The existence of temperature gradients D_a T_g is commented upon in relation to these theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This limits the class of scalar-tensor theories that can be modeled using standard relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics.
  • Kinetic-dependent couplings may necessitate non-Eckart constitutive relations for heat flux in general spacetimes.
  • Cosmological models relying on Eckart heat conduction should be restricted to F(Φ) to avoid inconsistencies on asymmetric backgrounds.
  • Investigating whether a redefinition of the effective temperature could absorb the transverse term in some cases would be a natural extension.

Load-bearing premise

That the effective heat flux extracted from the energy-momentum tensor in the scalar-comoving frame must exactly match the Eckart constitutive relation without the transverse term being absorbable into a redefinition of the temperature gradient.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the heat flux on a specific non-symmetric spacetime with a generic timelike scalar configuration, verifying if the transverse contribution can be expressed as part of D_a T_g for some effective temperature T_g.

read the original abstract

We show that in single--scalar theories of the form $\mathcal{L}=F(\Phi,X)R+G(\Phi,X)$, a generic nonminimal coupling $F(\Phi,X)$ induces, in the scalar--comoving frame, an additional transverse contribution to the effective heat flux, proportional to $(F_X/8\pi F)V_{\perp a}$, where $V_a \equiv h_a{}^c\nabla_c\nabla_d X\,u^d$ and $V_{\perp a}$ denotes the component orthogonal to the 4--acceleration $a_a$. This term cannot in general be written as a spatial temperature gradient, and therefore obstructs a standard Eckart interpretation of the scalar sector for arbitrary timelike scalar configurations. As a result, requiring an Eckart heat flux $q_a = -K\bigl(D_a T_g + T_g\, a_a\bigr)$ for all such configurations is possible if and only if $F_X(\Phi,X)\equiv 0$, i.e.\ $F(\Phi,X)=F(\Phi)$, resulting in a theory that is a subclass of Horndeski. Thus, only Jordan--like theories of the type $F(\Phi)R+G(\Phi,X)$ admit a global Eckart fluid picture of the scalar sector, while models with $F_X\neq 0$ can recover an Eckart--like form only on highly symmetric backgrounds where the transverse contribution vanishes or collapses to a single gradient direction. We also make a brief comment on the existence of temperature gradients $D_aT_g$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in single-scalar theories with Lagrangian F(Φ,X)R + G(Φ,X), the effective heat flux extracted from the stress-energy tensor in the scalar-comoving frame acquires an additional transverse term (F_X/8πF) V_⊥a, where V_a ≡ h_a^c ∇_c ∇_d X u^d and V_⊥a is the component orthogonal to the four-acceleration a_a. This term cannot in general be rewritten as a spatial temperature gradient D_a T_g. Consequently, the Eckart constitutive relation q_a = -K(D_a T_g + T_g a_a) holds for arbitrary timelike scalar configurations if and only if F_X(Φ,X) ≡ 0, i.e., F = F(Φ), reducing the theory to a subclass of Horndeski. Only Jordan-like theories F(Φ)R + G(Φ,X) therefore admit a global Eckart fluid interpretation of the scalar sector.

Significance. If the central derivation is sound, the result supplies a concrete no-go criterion distinguishing which non-minimal scalar-curvature couplings permit a standard relativistic fluid picture with Eckart heat flux. This has direct implications for thermodynamic consistency in scalar-tensor cosmology and for the viability of models with kinetic-dependent non-minimal couplings. The additional remark on the existence of temperature gradients D_a T_g provides a useful side observation for thermodynamic analyses in modified gravity.

major comments (2)
  1. The necessity part of the central iff statement—that no scalar function T_g(Φ,X,...) can absorb the transverse term into D_a T_g for generic configurations—rests on an implicit assumption about the allowed functional dependence of T_g. The manuscript asserts that the term 'cannot in general be written as a spatial temperature gradient' but does not supply an exhaustive argument ruling out T_g that depends on second derivatives of X or on a_a itself. An explicit demonstration that every admissible T_g leaves a residual transverse component would be required to establish that F_X must vanish identically.
  2. §3 (derivation of the projected heat flux): the decomposition of the effective stress-energy tensor in the scalar-comoving frame and the identification of the orthogonal component V_⊥a should include a step-by-step verification that this term is independent of any possible redefinition of the temperature gradient under the chosen frame. The current presentation leaves the orthogonality and non-gradient character insufficiently explicit for the load-bearing claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The definition V_a ≡ h_a^c ∇_c ∇_d X u^d and the projection operator h_ab should be introduced at the first appearance rather than assumed from prior literature.
  2. A short explicit example (e.g., a simple FLRW background where V_⊥a vanishes) would illustrate the statement that Eckart-like behavior can be recovered on highly symmetric spacetimes even when F_X ≠ 0.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. We address the major comments point by point below, clarifying the assumptions and expanding the derivations as needed. We will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The necessity part of the central iff statement—that no scalar function T_g(Φ,X,...) can absorb the transverse term into D_a T_g for generic configurations—rests on an implicit assumption about the allowed functional dependence of T_g. The manuscript asserts that the term 'cannot in general be written as a spatial temperature gradient' but does not supply an exhaustive argument ruling out T_g that depends on second derivatives of X or on a_a itself. An explicit demonstration that every admissible T_g leaves a residual transverse component would be required to establish that F_X must vanish identically.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. In the standard framework of relativistic thermodynamics underlying the Eckart theory, the temperature T_g is a function of the thermodynamic state variables, specifically Φ and X in this model, and possibly their first gradients, but not on second derivatives of X or the four-acceleration a_a, as such dependencies would violate the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium. We will add an explicit statement in the revised manuscript defining the class of admissible T_g and demonstrate that for any such T_g, the transverse component V_⊥a cannot be absorbed into D_a T_g for generic configurations, by showing that the second-derivative terms in V_a do not match the structure of a gradient of a first-order function. This provides the required demonstration within the physically relevant class of temperature functions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: §3 (derivation of the projected heat flux): the decomposition of the effective stress-energy tensor in the scalar-comoving frame and the identification of the orthogonal component V_⊥a should include a step-by-step verification that this term is independent of any possible redefinition of the temperature gradient under the chosen frame. The current presentation leaves the orthogonality and non-gradient character insufficiently explicit for the load-bearing claim.

    Authors: We agree that the presentation in §3 can be made more explicit. In the revised version, we will include a step-by-step derivation of the projected heat flux, starting from the effective stress-energy tensor, projecting orthogonal to u^a, and identifying the heat flux component. We will explicitly verify the orthogonality of V_⊥a to a_a using the projector h_ab and show that V_a is constructed such that its transverse part is independent of the choice of temperature redefinition, as any adjustment to T_g would only modify the term along a_a. Additionally, we will demonstrate the non-gradient nature by assuming equality to D_a T_g and deriving a contradiction for non-zero F_X in generic spacetimes. These clarifications will address the concern directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation follows directly from EMT decomposition in scalar-comoving frame

full rationale

The central claim follows from the explicit decomposition of the energy-momentum tensor for the action L = F(Φ,X)R + G(Φ,X) in the scalar-comoving frame, yielding the transverse term (F_X/8πF) V_⊥a. The statement that this term cannot in general be absorbed into D_a T_g + T_g a_a is a direct consequence of the functional independence of V_⊥a from the acceleration and the requirement that the equality hold for arbitrary timelike scalar configurations; it does not reduce to any fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The iff result that F_X ≡ 0 is required for a global Eckart interpretation is therefore a mathematical consequence of the chosen frame and constitutive relation, with no load-bearing step that collapses to its own inputs by construction. The paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard relativistic decomposition of the energy-momentum tensor into fluid variables in the scalar-comoving frame and on the conventional Eckart constitutive relation; no free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond ordinary general-relativity fluid formalism.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The energy-momentum tensor of the scalar-tensor theory admits a standard fluid decomposition (energy density, pressure, heat flux, anisotropic stress) in the scalar-comoving frame.
    Invoked when the effective heat flux is extracted from the projected conservation equations.
  • domain assumption The desired heat-flux form is exactly the Eckart relation q_a = -K(D_a T_g + T_g a_a).
    Used as the benchmark that the derived flux must match for all configurations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1470 out tokens · 39188 ms · 2026-05-16T20:15:31.400215+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. First-order thermodynamics of multi-scalar-tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Multi-scalar-tensor gravity admits an exact covariant thermodynamic interpretation as an imperfect fluid whose heat flux involves a coupling-derived factor χ and a residual gradient sector, yielding multi-field therma...

  2. Frame invariant diffusive formulation of scalar-tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Scalar-tensor gravity admits a frame-invariant perfect-fluid description with zero temperature, so that general relativity corresponds to diffusive equilibrium for both minimal and nonminimal theories.

  3. Thermal channels of scalar and tensor waves in Jordan-frame scalar--tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Scalar and tensor perturbations in Jordan-frame scalar-tensor gravity admit an exact linear-order Eckart effective-fluid description, with gravitational-wave damping governed by the scalar sector's transverse-traceles...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 40 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Eckart heat-flux applicability in $F(\Phi,X)R$ theories and the existence of temperature gradients

    has further strengthen the interpretation of the field equations as a formulation of the first law, like identities, TdS= dE+PdV. In this context, it was advocated that gravity should be understood as an emergent sce- nario in attempts to specify the gravitational entropy, which treat spacetime dynamics as the macroscopic limit of underlying statistical d...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Eckart-like

    for arbitrary configurations. As a result, demanding that the scalar sector admit a standard Eckart interpretation in its own comoving frame foralltimelike scalar configurations yields a simple selection rule: it is possible if and only if FX(Φ, X)≡0, i.e.F(Φ, X) =F(Φ). This motivates a practical admissibility criterion for scalar–curvature cou- plings ph...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Therefore the projectorP ab acts trivially on ˙a⟨a⟩, so j⊥a ≡P ab ˙a⟨b⟩ = ˙a⟨a⟩ implying j⊥φ = ˙aφ, j ⊥r =j ⊥θ = 0 (51) that allows to rewrite thercomponent of Eq. (34) as εrbcDbV c ⊥ =−2Xε rθφ Dθjφ ⊥ −D φjθ ⊥ =−4Xcos(θ) p B(r)j φ ⊥ (52) wherej φ ⊥ =h φφ ˙aφ = 1 2B N ′(r)ω ′(r) N(r) 2 and where it was used theh ij built connections 3Γφθφ = cotθ, 3Γθ φφ = ...

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    J. P. Mimoso, inModified Gravity and Cosmology; An Update by the CANTATA Network, edited by E. N. Sari- dakis, R. Lazkoz, V. Salzano, P. V. Moniz, S. Capozziello, J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, M. De Laurentis, and G. J. Olmo (2021) pp. 17–26

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Akramiet al.(CANTATA),Modified Gravity and Cosmology

    Y. Akramiet al.(CANTATA),Modified Gravity and Cos- mology. An Update by the CANTATA Network, edited by E. N. Saridakis, R. Lazkoz, V. Salzano, P. Vargas Moniz, S. Capozziello, J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, M. De Laurentis, and G. J. Olmo (Springer, 2021) arXiv:2105.12582 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.31, 161 (1973)

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D7, 2333 (1973)

    work page 1973

  8. [8]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    work page 1975

  9. [9]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D15, 2738 (1977)

    work page 1977

  10. [10]

    Essential and inessential features of Hawking radiation

    M. Visser, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D12, 649 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0106111

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    R. C. Tolman and P. Ehrenfest, Phys. Rev.36, 1791 (1930)

    work page 1930

  12. [12]

    Santiago and M

    J. Santiago and M. Visser, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30, 2150141 (2021), arXiv:2105.02422 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Eckart, Phys

    C. Eckart, Phys. Rev.58, 919 (1940)

    work page 1940

  14. [14]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed., Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 6 (Pergamon Press, 1987)

    work page 1987

  15. [15]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D31, 725 (1985)

    work page 1985

  16. [16]

    D. Jou, J. Casas-Vazquez, and G. Lebon, Rept. Prog. Phys.51, 1105 (1988)

    work page 1988

  17. [17]

    Pavon, Phys

    D. Pavon, Phys. Rev. D43, 375 (1991)

    work page 1991

  18. [18]

    Causal Thermodynamics in Relativity

    R. Maartens, Lect. Notes Phys.478, 203 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9609119

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  19. [19]

    M¨ uller, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik198, 329 (1967)

    I. M¨ uller, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik198, 329 (1967)

    work page 1967

  20. [20]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Annals of Physics118, 341 (1979)

    work page 1979

  21. [21]

    Ehlers, inGeneral Relativity and Cosmology, Proceed- ings of the International School of Physics ’Enrico Fermi’, Vol

    J. Ehlers, inGeneral Relativity and Cosmology, Proceed- ings of the International School of Physics ’Enrico Fermi’, Vol. 47, edited by R. K. Sachs (Academic Press, New York, 1971) pp. 1–70

    work page 1971

  22. [22]

    Ehlers, Gen

    J. Ehlers, Gen. Rel. Grav.43, 3367 (2011), [Posthumous republication of his foundational lectures]

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    G. F. R. Ellis, Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. Fermi47, 104 (1971)

    work page 1971

  24. [24]

    G. F. R. Ellis, Cargese Lect. Phys.6, 1 (1973)

    work page 1973

  25. [25]

    A. A. Coley and B. O. J. Tupper, Phys. Rev. D33, 2103 (1986)

    work page 1986

  26. [26]

    Prigogine, J

    I. Prigogine, J. Geheniau, E. Gunzig, and P. Nardone, Gen. Rel. Grav.21, 767 (1989)

    work page 1989

  27. [27]

    Gunzig, J

    E. Gunzig, J. Geheniau, and I. Prigogine, Nature330, 621 (1987)

    work page 1987

  28. [28]

    Pavon and J

    D. Pavon and J. M. Rubi, Phys. Rev. D37, 2052 (1988)

    work page 2052

  29. [29]

    Pavon, Class

    D. Pavon, Class. Quant. Grav.7, 487 (1990)

    work page 1990

  30. [30]

    J. A. S. Lima and I. Waga, Phys. Lett. A144, 432 (1990)

    work page 1990

  31. [31]

    M. O. Calvao, J. A. S. Lima, and I. Waga, Phys. Lett. A 162, 223 (1992)

    work page 1992

  32. [32]

    J. A. S. Lima and J. Santos, Int. J. Theor. Phys.34, 127 (1995)

    work page 1995

  33. [33]

    J. A. S. Lima, A. S. M. Germano, and L. R. W. Abramo, Phys. Rev. D53, 4287 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9511006. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  34. [34]

    J. A. S. Lima and A. Maia, Jr., Phys. Rev. D52, 5628 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9505052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  35. [35]

    J. A. E. Carrillo, J. A. S. Lima, and A. Maia, Jr, Int. J. Theor. Phys.35, 2013 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9906016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [36]

    Collisional equilibrium, particle production and the inflationary universe

    W. Zimdahl, J. Triginer, and D. Pavon, Phys. Rev. D54, 6101 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9608038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  37. [37]

    Cosmological two-fluid thermodynamics

    W. Zimdahl and D. Pavon, Gen. Rel. Grav.33, 791 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0005352

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    J. A. S. Lima, R. Silva, and A. R. Plastino, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2938 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0101030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  39. [39]

    First-principles Investigations on Polytypes of BaTiO3: Hybrid Calculations and Pressure Dependences

    P. Mart´ ın-Moruno and M. Visser, JHEP09, 050, arXiv:1305.1368 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Resolving unoccupied electronic states with laser ARPES in bismuth-based cuprate superconductors

    P. Mart´ ın-Moruno and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D91, 063510 (2015), arXiv:1502.04153 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    A one-dimensional mathematical model of collecting lymphatics coupled with an electro-fluid-mechanical contraction model and valve dynamics

    P. Mart´ ın-Moruno and M. Visser, Springer Proc. Phys. 189, 193 (2017), arXiv:1702.05830 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    J. P. Mimoso and D. Pav´ on, Phys. Rev. D94, 103507 (2016), arXiv:1610.07788 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    J. P. Mimoso and D. Pavon, Phys. Rev. D97, 103537 (2018), arXiv:1805.02894 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    D. S. Pereira, J. Ferraz, F. S. N. Lobo, and J. P. Mimoso, Entropy26, 947 (2024), arXiv:2411.03018 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Jacobson, Phys

    T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1260 (1995), arXiv:gr- qc/9504004

    work page arXiv 1995

  46. [46]

    Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New insights

    T. Padmanabhan, Rept. Prog. Phys.73, 046901 (2010), arXiv:0911.5004 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    E. P. Verlinde, JHEP04, 029, arXiv:1001.0785 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    E. P. Verlinde, SciPost Phys.2, 016 (2017), arXiv:1611.02269 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    A Gravitational Entropy Proposal

    T. Clifton, G. F. R. Ellis, and R. Tavakol, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 125009 (2013), arXiv:1303.5612 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Constructing black hole entropy from gravitational collapse

    G. Acquaviva, G. F. R. Ellis, R. Goswami, and A. I. M. Hamid, Phys. Rev. D91, 064017 (2015), arXiv:1411.5708 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    G. F. R. Ellis and M. Bruni, Phys. Rev. D40, 1804 (1989)

    work page 1989

  52. [52]

    The Covariant Approach to LRS Perfect Fluid Spacetime Geometries

    H. van Elst and G. F. R. Ellis, Class. Quant. Grav.13, 1099 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9510044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  53. [53]

    G. F. R. Ellis and H. van Elst, NATO Sci. Ser. C541, 1 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9812046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    G. F. R. Ellis, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 164001 (2011), arXiv:1103.2335 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [55]

    Espinosa-Portal´ es and J

    L. Espinosa-Portales and J. Garcia-Bellido, Phys. Dark Univ.34, 100893 (2021), arXiv:2106.16012 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Modified Gravity and Cosmology

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Sko- rdis, Phys. Rept.513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [57]

    Unveiling the Dynamics of the Universe

    P. Avelinoet al., Symmetry8, 70 (2016), arXiv:1607.02979 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Thermodynamic interpretation of the generalized gravity models with geometry - matter coupling

    T. Harko, Phys. Rev. D90, 044067 (2014), arXiv:1408.3465 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Generalized energy conditions in Extended Theories of Gravity

    S. Capozziello, F. S. N. Lobo, and J. P. Mimoso, Phys. Rev. D91, 124019 (2015), arXiv:1407.7293 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Energy conditions in modified gravity

    S. Capozziello, F. S. N. Lobo, and J. P. Mimoso, Phys. Lett. B730, 280 (2014), arXiv:1312.0784 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    J. P. Mimoso, F. S. N. Lobo, and S. Capozziello, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.600, 012047 (2015), arXiv:1412.6670 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  62. [62]

    Imperfect fluid description of modified gravities

    V. Faraoni and J. Cot´ e, Phys. Rev. D98, 084019 (2018), arXiv:1808.02427 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Faraoni and A

    V. Faraoni and A. Giusti, Phys. Rev. D103, L121501 (2021), arXiv:2103.05389 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Faraoni and A

    V. Faraoni and A. Giusti, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211406 (2025), arXiv:2502.18272 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Faraoni and S

    V. Faraoni and S. N. Cattivelli, To be published (2025), preprint, arXiv:2511.00347 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Giusti, S

    A. Giusti, S. Zentarra, L. Heisenberg, and V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D105, 124011 (2022), arXiv:2108.10706 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Miranda, S

    M. Miranda, S. Giardino, A. Giusti, and L. Heisenberg, Phys. Rev. D109, 124033 (2024), arXiv:2401.10351 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Miranda, D

    M. Miranda, D. Vernieri, S. Capozziello, and V. Faraoni, Gen. Rel. Grav.55, 84 (2023), arXiv:2209.02727 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Faraoni, A

    V. Faraoni, A. Giusti, and A. Mentrelli, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124031 (2021), arXiv:2110.02368 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Giardino, V

    S. Giardino, V. Faraoni, and A. Giusti, JCAP04(04), 053, arXiv:2202.07393 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Giusti, S

    A. Giusti, S. Giardino, and V. Faraoni, Gen. Rel. Grav. 55, 47 (2023), arXiv:2210.15348 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Faraoni and J

    V. Faraoni and J. Houle, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 521 (2023), arXiv:2302.01442 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Damour and K

    T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2217 (1993)

    work page 1993

  74. [74]

    Damour and K

    T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt, Phys. Rev. D48, 3436 (1993)

    work page 1993

  75. [75]

    J. P. Mimoso and A. M. Nunes, Phys. Lett. A248, 325 (1998)

    work page 1998

  76. [76]

    J. P. Mimoso and A. Nunes, Astrophys. Space Sci.261, 327 (1999)

    work page 1999

  77. [77]

    J. P. Mimoso and A. Nunes, Astrophys. Space Sci.283, 661 (2003)

    work page 2003

  78. [78]

    The Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy

    G. Gubitosi, F. Piazza, and F. Vernizzi, JCAP02, 032, arXiv:1210.0201 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    J. K. Bloomfield, ´E. ´E. Flanagan, M. Park, and S. Wat- son, JCAP08, 010, arXiv:1211.7054 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Essential Building Blocks of Dark Energy

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza, and F. Vernizzi, JCAP 08, 025, arXiv:1304.4840 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.