pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.07198 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-12 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Direct temperature readout in nonequilibrium quantum thermometry

Yan Xie , Junjie Liu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 15:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantum thermometrynonequilibrium thermodynamicstemperature readoutmaximum entropy principledynamical temperaturequbit thermometerquantum coherence
0
0 comments X

The pith

A corrected dynamical temperature provides a direct postprocessed readout from a nonequilibrium quantum thermometer without prior knowledge of the true temperature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a thermodynamic inference scheme that assigns a reference temperature to a nonequilibrium thermometer by maximizing entropy subject only to its observed mean energy. Positive semi-definite error functions are then derived that lower-bound how far this reference deviates from the actual sample temperature, with the bounds shrinking to zero once the thermometer reaches equilibrium. Subtracting or adjusting by these errors produces a corrected dynamical temperature that can be computed adaptively from measurements alone. A reader would care because most real nanoscale systems operate away from equilibrium, where conventional equilibrium-based temperature definitions lose accuracy, yet this method still recovers the true temperature through post-processing. Validation on a qubit thermometer shows the readout succeeds across varied initial states and improves when quantum coherence is larger.

Core claim

By applying the maximum entropy principle with the thermometer's mean energy as constraint, we assign a reference temperature to the nonequilibrium thermometer. We demonstrate that this reference temperature outperforms a commonly used effective temperature defined through equilibrium analogy. We obtain positive semi-definite error functions that lower-bound the deviation of the reference temperature from the true temperature in analogy to the quantum Cramer-Rao bound for the mean squared error and vanish upon thermalization with the sample. Combining the reference temperature with these error functions, we introduce a notion of corrected dynamical temperature which furnishes a postprocessed

What carries the argument

The corrected dynamical temperature, formed by combining a maximum-entropy reference temperature (constrained only by mean energy) with positive semi-definite error functions that bound its deviation from the true temperature and vanish at equilibrium.

If this is right

  • The reference temperature defined via maximum entropy with mean-energy constraint is strictly closer to the true temperature than the equilibrium-analogy effective temperature under nonequilibrium conditions.
  • The error functions supply a quantum-Cramer-Rao-like lower bound on the mean-squared deviation that holds for any nonequilibrium initial state.
  • The corrected dynamical temperature recovers the true sample temperature adaptively from energy measurements without requiring knowledge of the actual temperature or waiting for equilibrium.
  • Precision of the readout increases when the qubit thermometer carries more quantum coherence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same inference structure could be applied to readout of other thermodynamic parameters such as chemical potential or pressure in nonequilibrium quantum sensors.
  • Real-time monitoring protocols could use the adaptive correction to track temperature changes during ongoing quantum processes without pausing for thermalization.
  • The coherence-enhanced precision suggests that engineered quantum states in the thermometer could be deliberately prepared to tighten the error bounds in practical devices.

Load-bearing premise

The maximum entropy principle applied to the thermometer's mean energy yields a reference temperature whose deviation from the true temperature is lower-bounded by positive semi-definite error functions that disappear only upon full thermalization.

What would settle it

Prepare a qubit thermometer in a controlled nonequilibrium state coupled to a sample whose temperature is measured independently by another method; compute the corrected dynamical temperature from the qubit's energy statistics alone and check whether the deviation from the independent temperature stays inside the predicted error bounds for all evolution times.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.07198 by Junjie Liu, Yan Xie.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dynamics of FT (t) with dephasing strength γ0 = 0 (green line), γ0 = −.2 (orange line) and γ0 = 0.5 (blue line) starting from a coherent initial state ρp(0) = 0.5I+0.4σx −0.2σz with I the identity matrix. For comparison, the red curve shows F in T (t) for an incoher￾ent initial state ρp(0) = 0.5I − 0.2σz. The black dashed line marks the value of thermal QFI given by Eq. (21) which equals the station￾ary va… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dynamics of the reference temperature βr(t) under a co￾herent initial state ρ0(0) = 0.5I+0.2σx −0.2σz for different dephas￾ing strengths γ0. The blue solid line represents the effective temper￾ature βe(t) for γ0 = 0.5. The blacked dashed line marks the value of actual inverse temperature β. Other parameters are ω = 1, T = 0.5 and γ = 1. thereby its internal energy Ep(t). Following the maximum entropy princ… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Performance of the corrected dynamical temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Performance of the corrected dynamical temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum thermometry aims to measure temperature in nanoscale quantum systems, paralleling classical thermometry. However, temperature is not a quantum observable, and most theoretical studies have therefore concentrated on analyzing fundamental precision limits set by the quantum Fisher information through the quantum Cramer-Rao bound. In contrast, whether a direct temperature readout can be achieved in quantum thermometry remains largely unexplored, particularly under the nonequilibrium conditions prevalent in real-world applications. To address this, we develop a direct temperature readout scheme based on a thermodynamic inference strategy. The scheme integrates two conceptual developments: (i) By applying the maximum entropy principle with the thermometer's mean energy as a constraint, we assign a reference temperature to the nonequilibrium thermometer. We demonstrate that this reference temperature outperforms a commonly used effective temperature defined through equilibrium analogy. (ii) We obtain positive semi-definite error functions that lower-bound the deviation of the reference temperature from the true temperature-in analogy to the quantum Cramer-Rao bound for the mean squared error-and vanish upon thermalization with the sample. Combining the reference temperature with these error functions, we introduce a notion of corrected dynamical temperature which furnishes a postprocessed temperature readout under nonequilibrium conditions. This corrected dynamical temperature can be evaluated adaptively without prior knowledge of the actual temperature. We validate the corrected dynamical temperature in a qubit-based thermometer under a range of nonequilibrium initial states, confirming its capability to estimate the true temperature. Importantly, we find that increasing quantum coherence can enhance the precision of this readout.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce a direct temperature readout for nonequilibrium quantum thermometry by (i) assigning a reference temperature to the thermometer via the maximum-entropy principle constrained only by its mean energy, (ii) deriving positive semi-definite error functions that lower-bound the deviation between this reference temperature and the true temperature (vanishing at thermalization, analogous to a quantum Cramér-Rao bound), and (iii) combining them into a corrected dynamical temperature that can be evaluated adaptively from thermometer observables alone, without prior knowledge of the true temperature. Numerical validation on a qubit thermometer under various nonequilibrium initial states is reported to confirm the scheme and to show that quantum coherence can improve readout precision.

Significance. If the error functions are explicitly computable from measurable quantities and independent of the unknown true temperature, the construction supplies a practical post-processing recipe that converts a nonequilibrium thermometer into a direct temperature meter, moving the field beyond precision-limit analyses toward implementable readouts. The qubit validation and coherence-enhancement observation would then constitute concrete evidence that the method works under realistic conditions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section introducing the error functions (following the reference-temperature definition)] The manuscript does not supply the explicit functional form of the positive semi-definite error functions (the objects that are supposed to furnish the correction). Without these expressions it is impossible to verify the central claim that the corrected dynamical temperature can be evaluated adaptively without prior knowledge of the true temperature; if the functions depend on T_true, the system Hamiltonian, or the unknown coupling strength, the procedure becomes circular.
  2. [Numerical-results section (qubit validation)] The numerical validation on the qubit thermometer is described only qualitatively in the abstract and main text; no explicit error metrics (e.g., mean-squared deviation before and after correction, tables of residuals versus evolution time, or comparison against the effective-temperature baseline) are reported. This absence prevents assessment of whether the claimed improvement is statistically meaningful or merely visual.
  3. [Definition of corrected dynamical temperature] The construction of the corrected dynamical temperature from the reference temperature plus the error functions is stated but not written as an explicit formula. It is therefore unclear whether the final readout remains independent of unknown parameters or reduces to a fitted quantity, directly affecting the “parameter-free adaptive evaluation” assertion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The analogy between the error functions and the quantum Cramér-Rao bound is invoked but never made mathematically precise (e.g., no statement of the precise inequality relating the error functions to the quantum Fisher information of the thermometer state).
  2. [Throughout the manuscript] Notation for the reference temperature, true temperature, and corrected temperature should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional switches between symbols obscure the logical flow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and made revisions to improve the clarity and completeness of the presentation. Our point-by-point responses are as follows.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section introducing the error functions (following the reference-temperature definition)] The manuscript does not supply the explicit functional form of the positive semi-definite error functions (the objects that are supposed to furnish the correction). Without these expressions it is impossible to verify the central claim that the corrected dynamical temperature can be evaluated adaptively without prior knowledge of the true temperature; if the functions depend on T_true, the system Hamiltonian, or the unknown coupling strength, the procedure becomes circular.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. The error functions are obtained from the energy fluctuations of the thermometer under the maximum-entropy reference state (i.e., the thermal state consistent with the observed mean energy) and are therefore computable from measurable observables alone. They do not depend on the unknown true temperature or coupling strength. We acknowledge that the original manuscript described their properties without writing the explicit expressions; the revised version now includes these closed-form expressions in the section following the reference-temperature definition, confirming that the entire procedure remains parameter-free and adaptive. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical-results section (qubit validation)] The numerical validation on the qubit thermometer is described only qualitatively in the abstract and main text; no explicit error metrics (e.g., mean-squared deviation before and after correction, tables of residuals versus evolution time, or comparison against the effective-temperature baseline) are reported. This absence prevents assessment of whether the claimed improvement is statistically meaningful or merely visual.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics are necessary for a rigorous assessment. The revised manuscript now contains explicit error metrics, including mean-squared deviation of the corrected temperature from the true temperature versus evolution time, tables of residuals for each initial state, and side-by-side comparisons with the effective-temperature baseline. These additions demonstrate that the improvement is statistically significant and not merely visual. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Definition of corrected dynamical temperature] The construction of the corrected dynamical temperature from the reference temperature plus the error functions is stated but not written as an explicit formula. It is therefore unclear whether the final readout remains independent of unknown parameters or reduces to a fitted quantity, directly affecting the “parameter-free adaptive evaluation” assertion.

    Authors: We apologize for the lack of an explicit formula in the original text. The corrected dynamical temperature is obtained by adding a correction term built from the error functions to the reference temperature; the resulting expression depends only on the thermometer’s instantaneous mean energy and its variance. The revised manuscript now states this formula explicitly and includes a short derivation showing that no unknown parameters (true temperature, Hamiltonian details, or coupling) enter the final readout. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the corrected dynamical temperature construction

full rationale

The paper defines the reference temperature directly from the thermometer's mean energy via the maximum entropy principle, a standard inference step that does not presuppose the true temperature. It then derives positive semi-definite error functions bounding the deviation from the true temperature (vanishing at thermalization) and combines them with the reference to form the corrected dynamical temperature. The abstract states this corrected quantity is evaluable adaptively from thermometer observables alone without prior knowledge of the actual temperature, with numerical validation on a qubit thermometer under nonequilibrium states. No equation or step reduces by construction to the target temperature or relies on load-bearing self-citation; the chain remains independent and externally falsifiable via the provided examples.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the maximum entropy principle applied to mean energy and on the asserted properties of the error functions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The maximum entropy principle with the thermometer's mean energy as constraint assigns a reference temperature to the nonequilibrium thermometer.
    This is the starting point for defining the reference temperature that is claimed to outperform the effective temperature.
invented entities (1)
  • corrected dynamical temperature no independent evidence
    purpose: postprocessed temperature readout under nonequilibrium conditions
    Defined by combining the reference temperature with the error functions; no independent falsifiable handle is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1342 out tokens · 35325 ms · 2026-05-16T15:39:21.224895+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Surpassing thermal-state limit in thermometry via non-completely positive quantum encoding

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    General probe-environment correlations enable non-completely positive encodings that surpass the thermal-state bound in quantum thermometry precision.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A set of representative results is shown in Fig

    V arying initial populations We first analyze the effect of varying the diagonal elements (populations) while keeping the offdiagonal elements (coher- ences) fixed. A set of representative results is shown in Fig. 3. Panels (a)-(c) show the dynamics of the corrected dynamical temperatureT corr(t)[cf. Eq. (8)] for three initial states with increasing groun...

    work page

  2. [2]

    To isolate this effect, we fix the populations of the initial den- sity matrix and systematically vary the magnitude of its off- diagonal elements (coherences)

    V arying initial coherence Following our analysis of diagonal-element variations, we now examine the specific role of initial quantum coherence in the performance of the direct temperature readout scheme. To isolate this effect, we fix the populations of the initial den- sity matrix and systematically vary the magnitude of its off- diagonal elements (cohe...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Thermometry in the quantum regime: recent theoretical progress,

    M. Mehboudi, A. Sanpera, and L. Correa, “Thermometry in the quantum regime: recent theoretical progress,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 303001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Existence of tempera- ture on the nanoscale,

    M. Hartmann, G. Mahler, and O. Hess, “Existence of tempera- ture on the nanoscale,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 080402 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Colloquium: The physics of maxwell’s demon and information,

    K. Maruyama, F. Nori, and V . Vedral, “Colloquium: The physics of maxwell’s demon and information,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Thermodynamics of information,

    J. Parrondo, J. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, “Thermodynamics of information,” Nat. Phys.11, 131 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    The role of quantum information in thermodynamicsa topical review,

    J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. del Rio, and P. Skrzypczyk, “The role of quantum information in thermodynamicsa topical review,” J. Phys. A49, 143001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Quantum simulation,

    I. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, “Quantum simulation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 153 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Many-body physics with ultracold gases,

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, “Many-body physics with ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    Quantum information processing with supercon- ducting circuits: a review,

    G. Wendin, “Quantum information processing with supercon- ducting circuits: a review,” Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 106001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Thermometry and cooling of a bose gas to 0.02 times the con- densation temperature,

    R. Olf, F. Fang, G. Marti, A. MacRae, and D. Stamper-Kurn, “Thermometry and cooling of a bose gas to 0.02 times the con- densation temperature,” Nat. Phys.11, 720 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Single-atom thermometer for ultracold gases,

    M. Hohmann, F. Kindermann, T. Lausch, D. Mayer, F. Schmidt, and A. Widera, “Single-atom thermometer for ultracold gases,” Phys. Rev. A93, 043607 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Ther- mometry of a deeply degenerate fermi gas with a bose-einstein condensate,

    R. Lous, I. Fritsche, M. Jag, B. Huang, and R. Grimm, “Ther- mometry of a deeply degenerate fermi gas with a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A95, 053627 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Nanoscale temperature mapping in operating microelectronic devices,

    M. Mecklenburg, W. Hubbard, E. White, R. Dhall, S. Cronin, S Aloni, and B. Regan, “Nanoscale temperature mapping in operating microelectronic devices,” Science347, 629 (2015). 13

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Qubit thermometry for micromechanical resonators,

    M. Brunelli, S. Olivares, and M. Paris, “Qubit thermometry for micromechanical resonators,” Phys. Rev. A84, 032105 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Qubit- assisted thermometry of a quantum harmonic oscillator,

    M. Brunelli, S. Olivares, M. Paternostro, and M. Paris, “Qubit- assisted thermometry of a quantum harmonic oscillator,” Phys. Rev. A86, 012125 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    In situ thermometry of a cold fermi gas via de- phasing impurities,

    M. Mitchison, T. Fogarty, G. Guarnieri, S. Campbell, T. Busch, and J. Goold, “In situ thermometry of a cold fermi gas via de- phasing impurities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 080402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Using polarons for sub-nk quantum nondemolition thermometry in a bose-einstein condensate,

    M. Mehboudi, A. Lampo, C. Charalambous, L. Correa, M. Garc ´ıa-March, and M. Lewenstein, “Using polarons for sub-nk quantum nondemolition thermometry in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 030403 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Global quantum thermom- etry,

    J. Rubio, J. Anders, and L. Correa, “Global quantum thermom- etry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 190402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Single-qubit thermometry,

    S. Jevtic, D. Newman, T. Rudolph, and T. Stace, “Single-qubit thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A91, 012331 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Individ- ual quantum probes for optimal thermometry,

    L. Correa, M Mehboudi, G. Adesso, and A. Sanpera, “Individ- ual quantum probes for optimal thermometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 220405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Single-qubit probes for temperature estimation in the presence of collective baths,

    A. Ullah, M. Cattaneo, and ¨O. M ¨ustecaplıo˘glu, “Single-qubit probes for temperature estimation in the presence of collective baths,” Phys. Rev. A111, 062201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Harnessing coher- ence generation for precision single- and two-qubit quantum thermometry,

    Y . Aiache, A. El Allati, and K. El Anouz, “Harnessing coher- ence generation for precision single- and two-qubit quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A110, 032605 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Invasive- ness of nonequilibrium pure-dephasing quantum thermometry,

    F. Albarelli, M. Paris, B. Vacchini, and A. Smirne, “Invasive- ness of nonequilibrium pure-dephasing quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A108, 062421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Approaching heisenberg-scalable thermometry with built-in robustness against noise,

    D.-J. Zhang and D. Tong, “Approaching heisenberg-scalable thermometry with built-in robustness against noise,” npj Quan- tum Inf.8, 81 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Quantum thermometry by single-qubit dephasing,

    S. Razavian, C. Benedetti, M. Bina, Y . Akbari-Kourbolagh, and M. Paris, “Quantum thermometry by single-qubit dephasing,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus134, 284 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Discrimination of ohmic thermal baths by quantum dephasing probes,

    A. Candeloro and M. Paris, “Discrimination of ohmic thermal baths by quantum dephasing probes,” Phys. Rev. A103, 012217 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Low- temperature quantum thermometry boosted by coherence gen- eration,

    A. Ullah, M. Naseem, and ¨O. M ¨ustecaplıo˘glu, “Low- temperature quantum thermometry boosted by coherence gen- eration,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043184 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Coherence-enhanced single-qubit thermometry out of equilibrium,

    G. Frazo, M. Pezzutto, Y . Omar, E. Zambrini Cruzeiro, and S. Gherardini, “Coherence-enhanced single-qubit thermometry out of equilibrium,” Entropy26, 568 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Optimal quantum ther- mometry with coarse-grained measurements,

    K. Hovhannisyan, M. Jørgensen, G. Landi, ´A. Alhambra, J. Brask, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, “Optimal quantum ther- mometry with coarse-grained measurements,” PRX Quantum 2, 020322 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Bypass- ing thermalization timescales in temperature estimation using prethermal probes,

    N. Anto-Sztrikacs, H. Miller, A. Nazir, and D. Segal, “Bypass- ing thermalization timescales in temperature estimation using prethermal probes,” Phys. Rev. A109, L060201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Collisional quantum thermometry,

    S. Seah, S. Nimmrichter, D. Grimmer, J. Santos, V . Scarani, and G. Landi, “Collisional quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 180602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Tight bound on finite-resolution quantum thermometry at low temperatures,

    M. Jørgensen, P. Potts, M. Paris, and J. Brask, “Tight bound on finite-resolution quantum thermometry at low temperatures,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033394 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Nonequilib- rium quantum thermometry with noncommutative system-bath couplings,

    Y . Aiache, A. Allati, ˙I. Demir, and K. Anouz, “Nonequilib- rium quantum thermometry with noncommutative system-bath couplings,” Phys. Rev. A112, 062229 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Measuring the temperature of cold many-body quantum systems,

    K. Hovhannisyan and L. Correa, “Measuring the temperature of cold many-body quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. B98, 045101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Dynamical approach to ancilla-assisted quantum thermometry,

    A. Kiilerich, A. De Pasquale, and V . Giovannetti, “Dynamical approach to ancilla-assisted quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A98, 042124 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Bridging thermodynamics and metrology in nonequilibrium quantum thermometry,

    V . Cavina, L. Mancino, A. De Pasquale, I. Gianani, M. Sbros- cia, R. Booth, E. Roccia, R. Raimondi, V . Giovannetti, and M. Barbieri, “Bridging thermodynamics and metrology in nonequilibrium quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A98, 050101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Optimal nonequilibrium thermometry in Markovian environments,

    P. Sekatski and M. Perarnau-Llobet, “Optimal nonequilibrium thermometry in Markovian environments,” Quantum6, 869 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Multispin probes for thermometry in the strong-coupling regime,

    M. Brenes and D. Segal, “Multispin probes for thermometry in the strong-coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. A108, 032220 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Quantum fisher infor- mation matrix and multiparameter estimation,

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X. Lu, and X. Wang, “Quantum fisher infor- mation matrix and multiparameter estimation,” J. Phys. A53, 023001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Statistical distance and the geom- etry of quantum states,

    S. Braunstein and C. Caves, “Statistical distance and the geom- etry of quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  42. [42]

    Thermometry at the nanoscale,

    C. Brites, P. Lima, N. Silva, A. Mill ´an, V . Amaral, F. Palacio, and L. Carlos, “Thermometry at the nanoscale,” Nanoscale4, 4799–4829 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Thermodynamic meaning of local temperature of nonequilibrium open quantum systems,

    L. Ye, X. Zheng, Y . Yan, and M. Di Ventra, “Thermodynamic meaning of local temperature of nonequilibrium open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. B94, 245105 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Local temperatures out of equilibrium,

    D. Zhang, X. Zheng, and M. Di Ventra, “Local temperatures out of equilibrium,” Phys. Rep.830, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Information theory and statistical mechanics,

    E. T. Jaynes, “Information theory and statistical mechanics,” Phys. Rev.106, 620–630 (1957)

    work page 1957

  46. [46]

    Temper- ature in nonequilibrium quantum systems,

    S. Alipour, F. Benatti, M. Afsary, F. Bakhshinezhad, M. Ramezani, T. Ala-Nissila, and A. T. Rezakhani, “Temper- ature in nonequilibrium quantum systems,” arXiv:2105.11915

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Oper- ational definition of the temperature of a quantum state,

    P. Lipka-Bartosik, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and N. Brunner, “Oper- ational definition of the temperature of a quantum state,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 040401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Quantum mpemba effect in a quantum dot with reservoirs,

    A. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, “Quantum mpemba effect in a quantum dot with reservoirs,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 080402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Entropy and temperature in finite iso- lated quantum systems,

    P. Burke and M. Haque, “Entropy and temperature in finite iso- lated quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. E107, 034125 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Second law of thermodynamics without einstein relation,

    B. Sorkin, H. Diamant, G. Ariel, and T. Markovich, “Second law of thermodynamics without einstein relation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 267101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Necessity for quan- tum coherence of nondegeneracy in energy flow,

    T. Ma, M. Zhao, S. Fei, and M.-H. Yung, “Necessity for quan- tum coherence of nondegeneracy in energy flow,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 062303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    First and second law of quantum thermodynamics: A consistent derivation based on a micro- scopic definition of entropy,

    P. Strasberg and A. Winter, “First and second law of quantum thermodynamics: A consistent derivation based on a micro- scopic definition of entropy,” PRX Quantum2, 030202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Inferring general links between energetics and information with unknown envi- ronment,

    J. Liu, J. Lu, C. Wang, and J.-H. Jiang, “Inferring general links between energetics and information with unknown envi- ronment,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033202 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Experimentally probing landauer’s principle in the quantum many-body regime,

    S. Aimet, M. Tajik, G. Tournaire, P. Sch ¨uttelkopf, J. Sabino, S. Sotiriadis, G. Guarnieri, J. Schmiedmayer, and J. Eisert, “Experimentally probing landauer’s principle in the quantum many-body regime,” Nat. Phys. (2025), 10.1038/s41567-025- 02930-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025- 2025

  55. [55]

    Going beyond Landauer: Information-cost relations from inference based on the maxi- mum entropy principle,

    Y . Xiao, J.-H. Jiang, and J. Liu, “Going beyond Landauer: Information-cost relations from inference based on the maxi- mum entropy principle,” arXiv:2509.17060

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Universal landauer-like inequality from the first law of thermodynamics,

    J. Liu and H. Nie, “Universal landauer-like inequality from the first law of thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. A108, L040203 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, New York, 2002). 14

    work page 2002

  58. [58]

    Sensing out-of- equilibrium and quantum non-gaussian environments via in- duced time-reversal symmetry breaking on the quantum-probe dynamics,

    M. Kuffer, A. Zwick, and G. ´Alvarez, “Sensing out-of- equilibrium and quantum non-gaussian environments via in- duced time-reversal symmetry breaking on the quantum-probe dynamics,” PRX Quantum6, 020320 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, New York, 2007)

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    Quantum estimation for quantum technology,

    M. Paris, “Quantum estimation for quantum technology,” Int. J. Quantum Inf.7, 125 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [61]

    C. W. Helstrom,Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic, New York, 1976)

    work page 1976

  62. [62]

    A. S. Holevo,Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory(Ed. della Normale, Pisa, 2011)

    work page 2011

  63. [63]

    Fisher infor- mation under decoherence in bloch representation,

    W. Zhong, Z. Sun, J. Ma, X. Wang, and F. Nori, “Fisher infor- mation under decoherence in bloch representation,” Phys. Rev. A87, 022337 (2013)

    work page 2013