pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17537 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Surpassing thermal-state limit in thermometry via non-completely positive quantum encoding

Anindita Sarkar , Paranjoy Chaki , Debarupa Saha , Ujjwal Sen
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum thermometrynon-completely positive mapsinitial correlationstemperature estimationquantum metrologyNCP encodingqubit probes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-completely positive encodings from initial probe-environment correlations allow quantum thermometers to surpass the thermal-state limit

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies quantum thermometry in cases where the probe begins correlated with the environment, producing non-completely positive encoding maps rather than the usual completely positive ones assumed in standard treatments. It establishes that pure entangled initial states achieve only the same maximum precision as the thermal-state bound, but general correlated states enable the precision to exceed that bound. The demonstration uses analytic results for equal-dimension systems followed by explicit qubit-qubit models with XY interactions. This indicates that realistic initial correlations, often present in experiments, can be leveraged to improve temperature sensing performance.

Core claim

By relaxing the assumption of pure probe-environment states and allowing general correlated initial states that generate Type-II non-completely positive encodings, the maximum achievable precision in estimating the temperature of the environment surpasses the thermal-state limit that holds for completely positive encodings and for pure entangled states.

What carries the argument

Type-II non-completely positive encoding maps generated by general correlated probe-environment initial states

If this is right

  • For pure entangled probe-environment states of equal but arbitrary dimension, the maximum precision matches the thermal-state bound.
  • For general correlated initial states, the estimation precision can exceed the thermal-state limit.
  • The improvement appears in concrete qubit-qubit systems coupled by XY interactions.
  • NCP encodings therefore provide a route to better thermometric performance when initial correlations are present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Engineering specific initial correlations may serve as an additional resource for precision in other quantum metrology tasks beyond thermometry.
  • In laboratory settings, the presence of unavoidable correlations could convert from a limitation into an advantage for sensing.
  • The same mechanism might extend to different interaction types or higher dimensions, yielding further gains in estimation accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

That the non-completely positive encodings arising from general initial probe-environment correlations are physically realizable and that the temperature estimation protocol remains valid under the model's interaction and measurement assumptions.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the quantum Fisher information for temperature in a qubit probe correlated with a qubit environment under XY interaction that fails to exceed the thermal-state value would falsify the surpassing claim, while a value exceeding it would support it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17537 by Anindita Sarkar, Debarupa Saha, Paranjoy Chaki, Ujjwal Sen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Variation of the optimal QFI of the encoded probe state for (a) arbitrary unitaries and (b) energy-conserving unitaries, with the environment temperature, under the CPTP and the NCPTP encoding processes. Here, the probe and the environment are both taken as qubits. Across both subplots, the optimal QFI is plotted as a function of the environment temperature T ∈ [1.0, 2.0] in steps of 0.01. Temperature is p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Behaviour of optimal QFI of the encoded probe state, for global unitary generated via (a) two-qubit XX interaction and (b) two-qubit anisotropic XY interaction, with the environment temperature, corresponding to the CPTP and the NCPTP encodings. The main plots in both figures represent the variation of the optimal QFI with environment temperature T ∈ [1.0, 2.0], with a step size of 0.01. The horizontal axi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Conventional quantum thermometry assumes completely positive (CP) encoding maps, where the probe is initially uncorrelated with the environment. We consider realistic scenarios with initial probe-environment correlations leading to physically realizable non-completely positive (NCP) encoding, and show how such encodings can significantly impact temperature estimation of the environment. We first consider pure entangled probe-environment initial states (Type-I NCP encoding) and analytically show that for probes and environments of equal but arbitrary dimension, the maximum achievable precision matches the thermal-state bound, as in the CP case. However, upon relaxing the constraint of pure probe-environment states and considering general correlated initial states (Type-II NCP encoding), we demonstrate that the estimation precision can surpass the thermal-state limit. This establishes a clear advantage of NCP encoding in enhancing thermometric performance. We illustrate the results using qubit probes interacting with qubit environments via XY interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that non-completely positive (NCP) encodings from initial probe-environment correlations can enhance quantum thermometry. Analytically, for pure entangled initial states (Type-I NCP) with equal-dimensional probes and environments, the maximum precision matches the thermal-state bound obtained under completely positive (CP) encodings. For general mixed correlated initial states (Type-II NCP), the estimation precision is shown to surpass the thermal-state limit, with a numerical illustration for qubit probes and environments interacting via XY couplings.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work demonstrates a concrete advantage of realistic initial correlations in surpassing standard thermometric bounds, which is relevant for metrology in open quantum systems. The analytical equality result for Type-I provides a useful benchmark, and the Type-II surpassing claim, if physically realizable, would be a notable extension beyond CP and pure-state limits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Type-II NCP encoding section] The Type-II NCP construction (abstract and main text on general correlated states) requires an initial joint probe-environment density operator whose environment marginal is exactly the thermal Gibbs state at the unknown temperature T. No T-independent preparation protocol is provided that preserves positivity, the desired correlations, and the exact thermal marginal for arbitrary unknown T; this raises a realizability issue for the thermometry protocol itself.
  2. [Numerical illustration for qubits] The numerical qubit-qubit illustration (final section) demonstrates mathematical surpassing but lacks a full derivation of the quantum Fisher information, error bars on the reported precision values, or an explicit check that the initial state preparation does not implicitly require knowledge of T.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods or encoding map definition] Clarify the precise definition of the encoding map for Type-II states, including how the partial trace and subsequent XY evolution are computed, to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below, indicating where we agree and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Type-II NCP encoding section] The Type-II NCP construction (abstract and main text on general correlated states) requires an initial joint probe-environment density operator whose environment marginal is exactly the thermal Gibbs state at the unknown temperature T. No T-independent preparation protocol is provided that preserves positivity, the desired correlations, and the exact thermal marginal for arbitrary unknown T; this raises a realizability issue for the thermometry protocol itself.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this point. The manuscript focuses on the theoretical advantage that NCP encodings from general correlated initial states can provide in surpassing the thermal-state bound, assuming such an initial joint state can be prepared with the environment marginal fixed to the Gibbs state at the true (unknown) T. We do not claim or provide a T-independent preparation protocol that works for arbitrary unknown T while preserving positivity and the required correlations. In the revised manuscript, we will explicitly clarify this assumption in the abstract and the Type-II section, and add a discussion noting that practical realization for unknown T would require either adaptive preparation or prior calibration, which is a limitation of the current analysis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical illustration for qubits] The numerical qubit-qubit illustration (final section) demonstrates mathematical surpassing but lacks a full derivation of the quantum Fisher information, error bars on the reported precision values, or an explicit check that the initial state preparation does not implicitly require knowledge of T.

    Authors: We agree that additional details are needed for clarity and rigor. In the revised version, we will provide the full analytical derivation of the quantum Fisher information for the qubit-qubit XY interaction case, including the explicit form of the evolved probe state and the QFI formula used. We will also include a statement confirming that the initial correlated state is constructed using the thermal marginal at the true temperature T (as per the Type-II definition), and discuss that this assumes knowledge of T for preparation in the numerical example, consistent with the theoretical setup. Since the reported values are exact numerical evaluations for chosen parameters rather than statistical estimates, error bars are not applicable, but we will note the numerical precision of the computations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation of NCP encoding bounds is self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines Type-I (pure entangled) and Type-II (general correlated) initial states, constructs the induced encoding maps under the given XY interaction, and computes the resulting quantum Fisher information analytically. The claim that Type-II encodings can exceed the thermal-state limit follows from explicit evaluation of these maps and the QFI expression for the qubit case, without any parameter fitting, self-definition, or reduction to prior self-citations. The initial-state marginals are part of the model assumptions rather than outputs of the derivation, and no load-bearing step collapses to an input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard quantum mechanics for open systems and the physical realizability of NCP maps from initial correlations; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Initial probe-environment correlations produce physically realizable non-completely positive encoding maps for temperature estimation.
    Invoked to justify the use of NCP maps in thermometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5456 in / 1101 out tokens · 61334 ms · 2026-05-10T05:18:09.832477+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Type-I NCPTP encoding: the initial probe-environment joint stateρ SE is a pure entangled state

  2. [2]

    The probe-environment initial states in both types of NCPTP encodings are chosen such that the reduced state of the en- vironment is the thermal stateτ E

    Type-II NCPTP encoding: the initial probe- environment joint stateρ SE is an arbitrary correlated state. The probe-environment initial states in both types of NCPTP encodings are chosen such that the reduced state of the en- vironment is the thermal stateτ E. The encoded probe state ρS(T)is then obtained via the action of the quantum map in Eq. (4) for th...

  3. [3]

    T. M. Stace, Quantum limits of thermometry, Phys. Rev. A82, 011611 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Brunelli, S

    M. Brunelli, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris, Qubit thermom- etry for micromechanical resonators, Phys. Rev. A84, 032105 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Jevtic, D

    S. Jevtic, D. Newman, T. Rudolph, and T. M. Stace, Single- qubit thermometry, Phys. Rev. A91, 012331 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    L. A. Correa, M. Mehboudi, G. Adesso, and A. Sanpera, In- dividual quantum probes for optimal thermometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 220405 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Jarzyna and M

    M. Jarzyna and M. Zwierz, Quantum interferometric measure- ments of temperature, Phys. Rev. A92, 032112 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    M. G. A. Paris, Achieving the landau bound to precision of quantum thermometry in systems with vanishing gap, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49, 03LT02 (2015)

    2015

  9. [9]

    D. Xie, C. Xu, and A. M. Wang, Optimal quantum thermome- try by dephasing, Quantum Inf. Process.16, 155 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Campbell, M

    S. Campbell, M. Mehboudi, G. D. Chiara, and M. Paternostro, Global and local thermometry schemes in coupled quantum systems, New J. Phys.19, 103003 (2017). 9

    2017

  11. [11]

    L. A. Correa, M. Perarnau-Llobet, K. V . Hovhannisyan, S. Hern ´andez-Santana, M. Mehboudi, and A. Sanpera, En- hancement of low-temperature thermometry by strong cou- pling, Phys. Rev. A96, 062103 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    De Pasquale and T

    A. De Pasquale and T. M. Stace, Quantum thermometry, in Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental As- pects and New Directions, edited by F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018) pp. 503–527

    2018

  13. [13]

    Seveso and M

    L. Seveso and M. G. A. Paris, Trade-off between informa- tion and disturbance in qubit thermometry, Phys. Rev. A97, 032129 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    A. H. Kiilerich, A. De Pasquale, and V . Giovannetti, Dynam- ical approach to ancilla-assisted quantum thermometry, Phys. Rev. A98, 042124 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    Cavina, L

    V . Cavina, L. Mancino, A. De Pasquale, I. Gianani, M. Sbros- cia, R. I. Booth, E. Roccia, R. Raimondi, V . Giovannetti, and M. Barbieri, Bridging thermodynamics and metrology in nonequilibrium quantum thermometry, Phys. Rev. A98, 050101 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    Razavian, C

    S. Razavian, C. Benedetti, M. Bina, Y . Akbari-Kourbolagh, and M. G. A. Paris, Quantum thermometry by single-qubit de- phasing, Eur. Phys. J. Plus134, 284 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    Mehboudi, A

    M. Mehboudi, A. Sanpera, and L. A. Correa, Thermometry in the quantum regime: recent theoretical progress, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 303001 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    P. P. Potts, J. B. Brask, and N. Brunner, Fundamental limits on low-temperature quantum thermometry with finite resolution, Quantum3, 161 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    S. Seah, S. Nimmrichter, D. Grimmer, J. P. Santos, V . Scarani, and G. T. Landi, Collisional quantum thermometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 180602 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Gebbia, C

    F. Gebbia, C. Benedetti, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, M. Bina, and M. G. A. Paris, Two-qubit quantum probes for the temperature of an ohmic environment, Phys. Rev. A101, 032112 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    A. K. Pati, C. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, and S. Ghosh, Quantum precision thermometry with weak measurements, Phys. Rev. A102, 012204 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    M. R. Jørgensen, P. P. Potts, M. G. A. Paris, and J. B. Brask, Tight bound on finite-resolution quantum thermometry at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033394 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    A. Shu, S. Seah, and V . Scarani, Surpassing the thermal cram´er-rao bound with collisional thermometry, Phys. Rev. A 102, 042417 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    W.-K. Mok, K. Bharti, L.-C. Kwek, and A. Bayat, Optimal probes for global quantum thermometry, Commun. Phys.4, 62 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    K. V . Hovhannisyan, M. R. Jørgensen, G. T. Landi, A. M. Al- hambra, J. B. Brask, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Optimal quan- tum thermometry with coarse-grained measurements, PRX Quantum2, 020322 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Zhang and W

    Z.-Z. Zhang and W. Wu, Non-markovian temperature sensing, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043039 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    Rubio, J

    J. Rubio, J. Anders, and L. A. Correa, Global quantum ther- mometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 190402 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Planella, M

    G. Planella, M. F. B. Cenni, A. Ac´ın, and M. Mehboudi, Bath- induced correlations enhance thermometry precision at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 040502 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    M. F. Cenni, L. Lami, A. Ac ´ın, and M. Mehboudi, Thermom- etry of Gaussian quantum systems using Gaussian measure- ments, Quantum6, 743 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    Aybar, A

    E. Aybar, A. Niezgoda, S. S. Mirkhalaf, M. W. Mitchell, D. Benedicto Orenes, and E. Witkowska, Critical quantum thermometry and its feasibility in spin systems, Quantum6, 808 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Glatthard, J

    J. Glatthard, J. Rubio, R. Sawant, T. Hewitt, G. Barontini, and L. A. Correa, Optimal cold atom thermometry using adaptive bayesian strategies, PRX Quantum3, 040330 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    Mihailescu, S

    G. Mihailescu, S. Campbell, and A. K. Mitchell, Thermom- etry of strongly correlated fermionic quantum systems using impurity probes, Phys. Rev. A107, 042614 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Brenes and D

    M. Brenes and D. Segal, Multispin probes for thermometry in the strong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. A108, 032220 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Ullah, M

    A. Ullah, M. T. Naseem, and O. E. M ¨ustecaplıo˘glu, Low- temperature quantum thermometry boosted by coherence gen- eration, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043184 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Zhang and C

    N. Zhang and C. Chen, Achieving heisenberg scaling in low-temperature quantum thermometry, arXiv:2407.05762 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    A. Sone, D. O. Soares-Pinto, and S. Deffner, Conditional quantum thermometry—enhancing precision by measuring less, QST9, 045018 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Aiache, A

    Y . Aiache, A. El Allati, and K. El Anouz, Harnessing coher- ence generation for precision single- and two-qubit quantum thermometry, Phys. Rev. A110, 032605 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    A. K. Srivastava, U. Bhattacharya, M. Lewenstein, and M. Płodzie´n, Topological quantum thermometry, Phys. Rev. A111, 052216 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Q.-S. Tan, Y . Liu, X. Liu, H. Chen, X. Xiao, and W. Wu, Lim- itations of strong coupling in non-markovian quantum ther- mometry, Phys. Rev. A112, 042612 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Chattopadhyay, Non-gaussian dissipative quantum ther- mometry beyond gaussian bounds, Phys

    P. Chattopadhyay, Non-gaussian dissipative quantum ther- mometry beyond gaussian bounds, Phys. Rev. A112, 062606 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Ullah, M

    A. Ullah, M. T. Naseem, and O. E. M ¨ustecaplio˘glu, Optimal strategies for transient and equilibrium quantum thermometry using gaussian and non-gaussian probes, Phys. Rev. A112, 062601 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Aiache, A

    Y . Aiache, A. E. Allati, i. d. I. Demir, and K. E. Anouz, Nonequilibrium quantum thermometry with noncommutative system-bath couplings, Phys. Rev. A112, 062229 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Direct temperature readout in nonequilibrium quantum thermometry

    Y . Xie and J. Liu, Direct temperature readout in nonequilib- rium quantum thermometry, arXiv:2601.07198 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Precision Enhancement in Transient Quantum Thermometry:Cold-Probe Bias and Its Removal

    D. Saha and U. Sen, Precision enhancement in transient quantum thermometry:cold-probe bias and its removal, arXiv: 2601.15237 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Maruyama, F

    K. Maruyama, F. Nori, and V . Vedral, Colloquium: The physics of maxwell’s demon and information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1 (2009)

    2009

  46. [46]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  47. [47]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 153 (2014)

    2014

  48. [48]

    D. M. Toyli, C. F. de las Casas, D. J. Christle, V . V . Do- brovitski, and D. D. Awschalom, Fluorescence thermometry enhanced by the quantum coherence of single spins in dia- mond, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110, 8417 (2013)

    2013

  49. [49]

    Neumann, I

    P. Neumann, I. Jakobi, F. Dolde, C. Burk, R. Reuter, G. Waldherr, J. Honert, T. Wolf, A. Brunner, J. H. Shim, D. Suter, H. Sumiya, J. Isoya, and J. Wrachtrup, High- precision nanoscale temperature sensing using single defects in diamond, Nano Lett.13, 2738 (2013)

    2013

  50. [50]

    Mavalankar, S

    A. Mavalankar, S. J. Chorley, J. Griffiths, G. A. C. Jones, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, and C. G. Smith, A non-invasive elec- tron thermometer based on charge sensing of a quantum dot, Appl. Phys. Lett.103, 133116 (2013)

    2013

  51. [51]

    Zhang, Y

    S.-C. Zhang, Y . Dong, B. Du, H.-B. Lin, S. Li, W. Zhu, G.-Z. Wang, X.-D. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, A robust fiber- 10 based quantum thermometer coupled with nitrogen-vacancy centers, Rev. Sci. Instrum.92, 044904 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    D. S. Lvov, S. A. Lemziakov, E. Ankerhold, J. T. Peltonen, and J. P. Pekola, Thermometry based on a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 054079 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory, J. Stat. Phys.1, 231 (1969)

    1969

  54. [54]

    A. S. Holevo, Statistical decision theory for quantum systems, JMV A3, 337 (1973)

    1973

  55. [55]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3439 (1994)

    1994

  56. [56]

    S. L. Braunstein, C. M. Caves, and G. Milburn, Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and lorentz invari- ance, Ann. Phys. (N. Y .)247, 135 (1996)

    1996

  57. [57]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science 306, 1330 (2004)

    2004

  58. [58]

    Cappellaro, J

    P. Cappellaro, J. Emerson, N. Boulant, C. Ramanathan, S. Lloyd, and D. G. Cory, Entanglement assisted metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 020502 (2005)

    2005

  59. [59]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrol- ogy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010401 (2006)

    2006

  60. [60]

    M. G. A. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum technology, Int. J. Quant. Inf.07, 125 (2009)

    2009

  61. [61]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quan- tum metrology, Nat. Photon.5, 222 (2011)

    2011

  62. [62]

    A. S. Holevo,Probabilistic and statistical aspects of quantum theory, V ol. 1(Springer Science & Business Media, 2011)

    2011

  63. [63]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sens- ing, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  64. [64]

    Pezz `e, A

    L. Pezz `e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

  65. [65]

    Braun, G

    D. Braun, G. Adesso, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, U. Marzolino, M. W. Mitchell, and S. Pirandola, Quantum-enhanced mea- surements without entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035006 (2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    Mukhopadhyay, V

    C. Mukhopadhyay, V . Montenegro, and A. Bayat, Current trends in global quantum metrology, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58, 063001 (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    K. D. Agarwal, S. Mondal, A. Sahoo, D. Rakshit, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Quantum sensing with ultracold simulators in lat- tice and ensemble systems: A review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C.0, 2543006 (0)

  68. [68]

    P. P. Hofer, J. B. Brask, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and N. Brunner, Quantum thermal machine as a thermometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 090603 (2017)

    2017

  69. [69]

    Zhang and J

    Y . Zhang and J. Chen, Thermometry based on coulomb- coupled quantum dots, Physica E114, 113635 (2019)

    2019

  70. [70]

    Huangfu, S

    Y . Huangfu, S. fan Qi, and J. Jing, A multifunctional quantum thermal device: With and without inner coupling, Phys. Lett. A393, 127172 (2021)

    2021

  71. [71]

    C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory, Journal of statistical physics1, 231 (1969)

    1969

  72. [72]

    W. K. Wootters, Statistical distance and hilbert space, Phys. Rev. D23, 357 (1981)

    1981

  73. [73]

    Kraus,States, Effects and Operations: Fundamental No- tions of Quantum Theory(Springer, Berlin, 1983)

    K. Kraus,States, Effects and Operations: Fundamental No- tions of Quantum Theory(Springer, Berlin, 1983)

    1983

  74. [74]

    Alicki and K

    R. Alicki and K. Lendi,Quantum DynamicaL Semigroups and Applications(Springer, Berlin, 1987)

    1987

  75. [75]

    Preskill,Lecture Notes for Physics 229: Quantum Infor- mation and Computation(California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1998)

    J. Preskill,Lecture Notes for Physics 229: Quantum Infor- mation and Computation(California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1998)

    1998

  76. [76]

    Pechukas, Reduced dynamics need not be completely posi- tive, Phys

    P. Pechukas, Reduced dynamics need not be completely posi- tive, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 1060 (1994)

    1994

  77. [77]

    ˇStelmachoviˇc and V

    P. ˇStelmachoviˇc and V . Buˇzek, Dynamics of open quantum systems initially entangled with environment: Beyond the kraus representation, Phys. Rev. A64, 062106 (2001)

    2001

  78. [78]

    T. F. Jordan, A. Shaji, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Dynamics of initially entangled open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A70, 052110 (2004)

    2004

  79. [79]

    Ziman, Quantum process tomography: the role of initial correlations, arXiv:quant-ph/0603166 (2006)

    M. Ziman, Quantum process tomography: the role of initial correlations, arXiv:quant-ph/0603166 (2006)

    work page arXiv 2006

  80. [80]

    H. A. Carteret, D. R. Terno, and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Dynamics beyond completely positive maps: Some properties and appli- cations, Phys. Rev. A77, 042113 (2008)

    2008

Showing first 80 references.