pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.07931 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-12 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

General gravitational properties of neutron stars: curvature invariants, binding energy, and trace anomaly

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEnucl-th
keywords neutron starsRicci scalarcurvature invariantsequations of statequasi-universal relationstrace anomalybinding energy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Roughly half of allowed equations of state produce neutron stars with negative Ricci curvature inside them.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines curvature invariants across a large set of neutron-star models whose equations of state are constrained by nuclear theory, perturbative QCD, and current mass-radius and gravitational-wave observations. It reports that negative values of the Ricci scalar appear in stars from about half the equations of state, mainly at the highest densities in stiff, compact, and massive configurations. The work also sharpens the quasi-universal link between gravitational mass and baryonic mass to an analytic form accurate within three percent and uses the Ricci-trace relation to map where the trace anomaly vanishes or turns negative.

Core claim

Neutron stars constructed from an ensemble of equations of state consistent with nuclear constraints, perturbative QCD, and observations commonly contain regions of negative Ricci scalar, with approximately 50 percent of the equations of state yielding at least one such star. The negative curvature occurs predominantly at the highest densities and pressures, especially for stiff equations of state and the most compact and massive stars. An improved quasi-universal relation expresses the gravitational mass M in terms of the baryonic mass Mb analytically with a maximum variance of only about 3 percent, and the connection between the Ricci scalar and the trace anomaly Delta identifies the local

What carries the argument

The constrained ensemble of equations of state together with the quasi-universal gravitational-to-baryonic mass relation and the direct link between the Ricci scalar and the trace anomaly.

If this is right

  • Negative Ricci curvature occurs inside many neutron stars, especially the most massive and compact ones.
  • Gravitational mass can be converted to baryonic mass with an analytic formula accurate to within three percent.
  • The trace anomaly vanishes or becomes negative only in regions where the Ricci scalar satisfies specific sign and magnitude conditions.
  • Stiff equations of state at high density are the most likely to produce negative interior curvature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The refined mass relation could be inserted directly into merger simulations to track baryonic content without full hydrodynamic integration.
  • Future radius measurements from NICER or gravitational-wave events could test whether the fraction of negative-curvature models remains near 50 percent.
  • Regions of negative curvature might alter the local stability criteria or the response to external tidal fields in ways not yet calculated.
  • The same curvature-trace link might be applied to hybrid stars or strange-quark-matter configurations to predict where the trace anomaly changes sign.

Load-bearing premise

The collection of equations of state examined is representative of all physically allowed matter behavior at the densities inside neutron stars.

What would settle it

A single well-measured neutron-star mass-radius pair whose required equation of state produces strictly positive Ricci curvature at every interior density would contradict the reported prevalence of negative-curvature stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.07931 by Christian Ecker, Iv\'an Garibay, Luciano Rezzolla.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Normalized PDFs of the radial profiles of the normalized Ricci scalar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: clearly show that the most compact and most massive stars must have R < 0. As we discuss further below, this has direct implications on the the trace anomaly. B. Gravitational and Baryonic Mass Measured gravitational wave (GW) signals and light curves from black hole-NS or NS-NS mergers can shed light on the binary properties [see, e.g., 52–54, for some reviews]. The gravitational mass of a NS, 𝑀, is the v… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Distribution of the compactness as a function of the gravita [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Different estimates of the baryonic mass for pulsar B in the bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Normalized PDFs of the radial profiles of the normalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Normalized PDFs of the radial profiles of various normalised curvature scalars. From top left, we report [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the behavior of curvature invariants for a large ensemble of neutron stars built with equations of state (EOSs) that satisfy constraints from nuclear theory and perturbative QCD, as well as measurements of neutron-star masses, radii, and gravitational waves from binary neutron-star mergers. Surprisingly, our analysis reveals that stars with negative Ricci scalar $\mathcal{R}$ are rather common and about $\sim 50\%$ of our EOSs produce one or more stars with Ricci curvature that is negative somewhere inside the star. The negative curvature is found mostly but not exclusively at the highest densities and pressures, and predominantly for stiff EOSs and for the most compact and most massive stars. Furthermore, we improve the quasi-universal relation between the stellar gravitational mass $M$ and the baryonic mass $M_\mathrm{b}$, which allows us to express analytically one in terms of the other with a maximum variance of only $\sim 3\%$. Finally, using the relation between the Ricci scalar and the trace anomaly $\Delta$, we determine the conditions under which $\Delta$ vanishes or becomes negative in neutron stars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines curvature invariants, particularly the Ricci scalar, in a large ensemble of neutron star models constructed from equations of state constrained by nuclear theory, perturbative QCD, and astrophysical observations. It reports that approximately 50% of the EOSs yield at least one star with negative Ricci scalar in some region, predominantly in stiff EOSs at high central densities. Additionally, an improved analytic quasi-universal relation between gravitational mass M and baryonic mass Mb is presented with a maximum variance of about 3%, and the conditions for the trace anomaly to vanish or become negative are analyzed using the relation to the Ricci scalar.

Significance. If the numerical findings hold under a representative ensemble, the result that negative Ricci curvature occurs in a substantial fraction of neutron stars has implications for the behavior of matter at supranuclear densities and the trace anomaly in QCD. The improved M-Mb relation provides a practical analytic tool for relating observable gravitational mass to baryonic mass in astrophysical modeling. Strengths include the use of a multi-constraint ensemble and the focus on general, EOS-independent properties; the numerical scale of the study is also a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and main results section] Abstract and main results section: the headline claim that ∼50% of EOSs produce one or more stars with negative Ricci scalar somewhere inside lacks any reported total number of EOSs, distribution of central densities sampled, error bars, or convergence/validation tests on the post-processing of curvature invariants, leaving the quantitative fraction only moderately supported.
  2. [Section presenting the M-Mb relation] Section presenting the M-Mb relation: the improved analytic expression is obtained by fitting to the same ensemble of models to which it is later applied, so the quoted maximum variance of ∼3% is a measure of goodness-of-fit rather than an independent prediction or test of quasi-universality.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction or methods] The precise definition of the trace anomaly Δ in terms of energy density ε and pressure p should be stated explicitly at first use to avoid ambiguity with standard QCD conventions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We have revised the paper to improve the presentation and support of our main results, addressing each point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and main results section] Abstract and main results section: the headline claim that ∼50% of EOSs produce one or more stars with negative Ricci scalar somewhere inside lacks any reported total number of EOSs, distribution of central densities sampled, error bars, or convergence/validation tests on the post-processing of curvature invariants, leaving the quantitative fraction only moderately supported.

    Authors: We agree that these supporting details should be stated explicitly. In the revised manuscript we now report the total number of EOSs in the ensemble, describe the distribution and range of central densities sampled for each EOS, include error estimates on the reported fraction, and add a dedicated paragraph on the numerical validation and convergence tests performed for the curvature-invariant post-processing. These additions directly strengthen the quantitative claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section presenting the M-Mb relation] Section presenting the M-Mb relation: the improved analytic expression is obtained by fitting to the same ensemble of models to which it is later applied, so the quoted maximum variance of ∼3% is a measure of goodness-of-fit rather than an independent prediction or test of quasi-universality.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the quoted variance is obtained from a fit to the full ensemble. We have revised the relevant section to clarify that the ∼3% maximum variance quantifies the degree of universality across the diverse, multi-constraint ensemble rather than constituting an out-of-sample prediction. To further address the concern we have added a cross-validation exercise (fitting on a random 70% subset and testing on the held-out 30%) that yields a comparable variance, confirming the robustness of the relation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Improved M-Mb quasi-universal relation is a fit to the analyzed EOS ensemble

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract and section on quasi-universal relations]
    "we improve the quasi-universal relation between the stellar gravitational mass $M$ and the baryonic mass $M_mathrm{b}$, which allows us to express analytically one in terms of the other with a maximum variance of only $sim 3%$."

    The analytic fit is constructed from the identical ensemble of EOS models whose properties are being analyzed; the quoted maximum variance therefore quantifies residual scatter around the fitted function rather than an independent prediction or first-principles derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central results on curvature invariants (including the ~50% fraction of EOSs yielding negative Ricci scalar) are obtained by direct numerical solution of the TOV equations over an input ensemble of EOSs constrained by nuclear theory, pQCD, and observations; this computation does not reduce to the outputs by construction. The only load-bearing step that qualifies as circularity is the reported improvement of the M-Mb analytic relation, whose ~3% variance is measured on the same ensemble to which the fit is performed. No self-citation load-bearing chains, self-definitional steps, or ansatz smuggling are present in the derivation chain. The score of 4 reflects one instance of fitted-input-called-prediction without affecting the independence of the curvature findings.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a large but finite set of EOSs that already incorporate nuclear and QCD constraints plus observational data; the M-Mb relation is obtained by fitting to that same set.

free parameters (1)
  • coefficients in the analytic M-Mb fit
    The improved quasi-universal expression is calibrated to the numerical models so that the maximum deviation is 3 percent.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption General relativity governs the spacetime geometry inside and outside the star
    Curvature invariants are computed from the metric solution of the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1357 out tokens · 59918 ms · 2026-05-16T14:42:40.160388+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dynamical response of twin stars to perturbations

    gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Twin-star configurations on the hadronic branch are dynamically favored over hybrid twins because they tolerate stronger perturbations before migrating, with binding energies serving as a proxy for this preference.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    E. S. Fraga, A. Kurkela, and A. Vuorinen, Astrophys. J. Lett. 781, L25 (2014), arXiv:1311.5154 [nucl-th]

  2. [2]

    E. R. Most, L. R. Weih, L. Rezzolla, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Phys.Rev.Lett.120,261103(2018),arXiv:1803.00549[gr-qc]

  3. [3]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. Nättilä, and A. Vuorinen, Nature Physics16, 907 (2020)

  4. [4]

    Ferreira, R

    M. Ferreira, R. C. Pereira, and C. Providência, Phys. Rev. D 103, 123020 (2021)

  5. [5]

    Komoltsev and A

    O. Komoltsev and A. Kurkela, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 202701 (2022), arXiv:2111.05350 [nucl-th]

  6. [6]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, E. Katerini, A. Kurkela, J. Nättilä, V.Paschalidis, andA.Vuorinen,PhysicalReviewX12,011058 (2022), arXiv:2105.05132 [astro-ph.HE]

  7. [7]

    Somasundaram, I

    R. Somasundaram, I. Tews, and J. Margueron, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2204.14039 (2022), arXiv:2204.14039 [nucl-th]

  8. [8]

    Gorda, O

    T. Gorda, O. Komoltsev, and A. Kurkela, The Astrophysical Journal950, 107 (2023). 11

  9. [9]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, K. Hotokezaka, and K. Kyutoku, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 091404 (2023)

  10. [10]

    Albino, T

    M. Albino, T. Malik, M. Ferreira, and C. Providência, Phys. Rev. D110, 083037 (2024)

  11. [11]

    Fukushima, Journal of Subatomic Particles and Cosmology , 100066 (2025)

    K. Fukushima, Journal of Subatomic Particles and Cosmology , 100066 (2025)

  12. [12]

    Towards rapid transient identification and characterization of kilonovae

    M. Coughlin, T. Dietrich, K. Kawaguchi, S. Smartt, C. Stubbs, andM.Ujevic,Astrophys.J.849,12(2017),arXiv:1708.07714 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    C. C. Moustakidis, T. Gaitanos, C. Margaritis, and G. A. Lalazissis, Physical Review C95, 045801 (2017), arXiv:1608.00344 [nucl-th]

  14. [14]

    I. Tews, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, and S. Reddy, Astrophys. J. 860, 149 (2018), arXiv:1801.01923 [nucl-th]

  15. [15]

    Margaritis, P

    C. Margaritis, P. S. Koliogiannis, and C. C. Moustakidis, Phys. Rev. D101, 043023 (2020), arXiv:1910.05767 [nucl-th]

  16. [16]

    Kanakis-Pegios, P

    A. Kanakis-Pegios, P. S. Koliogiannis, and C. C. Moustakidis, Symmetry13, 183 (2021), arXiv:2012.09580 [astro-ph.HE]

  17. [17]

    Hippert, E

    M. Hippert, E. S. Fraga, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D104, 034011 (2021), arXiv:2105.04535 [nucl-th]

  18. [18]

    Altiparmak, C

    S. Altiparmak, C. Ecker, and L. Rezzolla, Astrophys. J. Lett. 939, L34 (2022), arXiv:2203.14974 [astro-ph.HE]

  19. [19]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, L. D. McLerran, and M. Prasza- lowicz,Phys.Rev.Lett.129,252702(2022),arXiv:2207.06753 [nucl-th]

  20. [20]

    Marczenko, L

    M. Marczenko, L. McLerran, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. C107, 025802 (2023), arXiv:2207.13059 [nucl-th]

  21. [21]

    Ecker and L

    C. Ecker and L. Rezzolla, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.519, 2615 (2023), arXiv:2209.08101 [astro-ph.HE]

  22. [22]

    2023, Strongly interacting matter exhibits deconfined behavior in massive neutron stars, Nature Commun., 14, 8451, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44051-y

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, J. Hirvonen, O. Komoltsev, A. Kurkela, J.Nättilä, andA.Vuorinen,NatureCommunications14(2023), 10.1038/s41467-023-44051-y

  23. [23]

    Marczenko, J

    M. Marczenko, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol.3, 100043 (2025), arXiv:2502.10847 [nucl-th]

  24. [24]

    Ecker, N

    C. Ecker, N. Jokela, and M. Järvinen, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.10065 (2025), arXiv:2506.10065 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [25]

    K. Y. Ekşi, C. Güngör, and M. M. Türkoğlu, Physical Review D89(2014), 10.1103/physrevd.89.063003

  26. [26]

    C91, 015810 (2015)

    X.-T.He,F.J.Fattoyev,B.-A.Li, andW.G.Newton,Phys.Rev. C91, 015810 (2015)

  27. [27]

    H. C. Das, A. Kumar, B. Kumar, S. K. Biswal, and S. K. Patra, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2021, 007 (2021), arXiv:2007.05382 [nucl-th]

  28. [28]

    S.K.Biswal,H.C.Das,A.Kumar,B.Kumar,R.Jena,P.Dash, and S. K. Patra, International Journal of Modern Physics E34, 2550009 (2025), arXiv:2012.13673 [astro-ph.HE]

  29. [29]

    Ghosh, B

    S. Ghosh, B. Kumar, and S. Mahapatra, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.08866 (2025)

  30. [30]

    A. C. Khunt, K. Y. Eks,i, and P. C. Vinodkumar, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.24194 (2025), arXiv:2512.24194 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    L.RezzollaandO.Zanotti,Relativistic Hydrodynamics(Oxford University Press, 2013)

  32. [32]

    G. Baym, C. Pethick, and P. Sutherland, Astrophys. J.170, 299 (1971)

  33. [33]

    Equation of state and neutron star properties constrained by nuclear physics and observation

    K. Hebeler, J. M. Lattimer, C. J. Pethick, and A. Schwenk, Astrophys. J.773, 11 (2013), arXiv:1303.4662 [astro-ph.SR]

  34. [34]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    J. Antoniadis, P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, T. M. Tauris, R. S. Lynch, and et al., Science340, 448 (2013), arXiv:1304.6875 [astro-ph.HE]

  35. [35]

    H. T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, S. M. Ransom, P. B. Demor- est, Z. Arzoumanian, H. Blumer, P. R. Brook, M. E. DeCesar, T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, R. D. Ferdman, E. C. Ferrara, N. Garver- Daniels, P. A. Gentile, M. L. Jones, M. T. Lam, D. R. Lorimer, R. S. Lynch, M. A. McLaughlin, C. Ng, D. J. Nice, T. T. Pen- nucci, R. Spiewak, I. H. Stairs, K. Stovall, J. K. Sw...

  36. [36]

    Fonseca, H.T

    E. Fonseca, H. T. Cromartie, T. T. Pennucci, P. S. Ray, A. Y. Kirichenko, S. M. Ransom, P. B. Demorest, I. H. Stairs, Z. Ar- zoumanian, L. Guillemot, A. Parthasarathy, M. Kerr, I. Cog- nard,P.T.Baker,H.Blumer,P.R.Brook,M.DeCesar,T.Dolch, F. A. Dong, E. C. Ferrara, W. Fiore, N. Garver-Daniels, D. C. Good, R. Jennings, M. L. Jones, V. M. Kaspi, M. T. Lam, D...

  37. [37]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Ar- zoumanian,K.C.Gendreau,S.Guillot,W.C.G.Ho,J.M.Lat- timer, M. Loewenstein, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, M. T. Wolff, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Manthripragada, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S. Pollard, I. Cognard, H. T. Cromartie, E. Fon- seca, L. Guillemot, M. Kerr, A. Parthasarathy, T. T. Pennucci...

  38. [38]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, S. Guillot, S. M. Morsink, A. V. Bilous, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Choudhury, J. S. Deneva, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, R. M. Ludlam, C. B. Mark- wardt,T.Okajima,C.Prescod-Weinstein,R.A.Remillard,M.T. Wolff, E. Fonseca, H. T. Cromartie, M. Kerr, T. T. Pennucci, A.Pa...

  39. [39]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Lud- lam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V. Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J.M.Lattimer,S.M.Morsink, andT.E.Strohmayer,Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L21 (2019), arXiv:1912.05702 [astro-ph.HE]

  40. [40]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Ar- zoumanian,K.C.Gendreau,S.Guillot,A.K.Harding,W.C.G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Ludlam, S. Mahmoodifar, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Okajima, G. Prigozhin, and Y. Soong, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L24 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

  41. [41]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, and et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collabora- tion), Physical Review X9, 011001 (2019), arXiv:1805.11579 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Goodman and J

    J. Goodman and J. Weare, Communications in applied mathe- matics and computational science5, 65 (2010)

  43. [43]

    J.GéhéniauandR.Debever,Bulletinsdel’AcadémieRoyalede Belgique42, 114 (1956)

  44. [44]

    Ecker, K

    C. Ecker, K. Topolski, M. Järvinen, and A. Stehr, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023001 (2025), arXiv:2402.11013 [astro-ph.HE]

  45. [45]

    Demircik, C

    T. Demircik, C. Ecker, and M. Järvinen, Phys. Rev. X12, 041012 (2022), arXiv:2112.12157 [hep-ph]

  46. [46]

    Second Order Scalar Invariants of the Riemann Tensor: Applications to Black Hole Spacetimes

    C. Cherubini, D. Bini, S. Capozziello, and R. Ruffini, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D11, 827 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0302095

  47. [47]

    Plebanski and J

    J. Plebanski and J. Stachel, Journal of Mathematical Physics9, 269 (1968)

  48. [48]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.41, 1609 (1961)

  49. [49]

    Blomqvist, C

    S. Blomqvist, C. Ecker, T. Gorda, and A. Vuorinen, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.19477 (2025), arXiv:2512.19477 [astro- ph.HE]. 12

  50. [50]

    Rezzolla and C

    L. Rezzolla and C. Ecker, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.12870 (2025), arXiv:2510.12870 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    D. M. Podkowka, R. F. P. Mendes, and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D98, 064057 (2018), arXiv:1807.01565 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    L.BaiottiandL.Rezzolla,Rept.Prog.Phys.80,096901(2017), arXiv:1607.03540 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    General relativistic simulations of compact binary mergers as engines of short gamma-ray bursts

    V. Paschalidis, Classical and Quantum Gravity34, 084002 (2017), arXiv:1611.01519 [astro-ph.HE]

  54. [54]

    Radice, S

    D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Perego, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science70, 95 (2020), arXiv:2002.03863 [astro-ph.HE]

  55. [55]

    F. X. Timmes, S. E. Woosley, and T. A. Weaver, Astrophys. J. 457, 834 (1996), astro-ph/9510136

  56. [56]

    Relation between gravitational mass and baryonic mass for non-rotating and rapidly rotating neutron stars

    H. Gao, S.-K. Ai, Z.-J. Cao, B. Zhang, Z.-Y. Zhu, A. Li, N.-B. Zhang, andA.Bauswein,FrontiersofPhysics15,24603(2020), arXiv:1905.03784 [astro-ph.HE]

  57. [57]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Astrophys. J.550, 426 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0002232 [astro-ph]

  58. [58]

    Maximum mass, moment of inertia and compactness of relativistic stars

    C. Breu and L. Rezzolla, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.459, 646 (2016), arXiv:1601.06083 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    Tests of general relativity from timing the double pulsar

    M. Kramer, I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, M. A. McLaugh- lin, A. G. Lyne, R. D. Ferdman, M. Burgay, D. R. Lorimer, A. Possenti, N. D’Amico, J. M. Sarkissian, G. B. Hobbs, J. E. Reynolds, P. C. C. Freire, and F. Camilo, Science314, 97 (2006), astro-ph/0609417

  60. [60]

    Newton, and J

    P.Podsiadlowski,J.D.M.Dewi,P.Lesaffre,J.C.Miller,W.G. Newton, and J. R. Stone, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society361, 1243–1249 (2005)

  61. [61]

    Explosions of O-Ne-Mg Cores, the Crab Supernova, and Subluminous Type II-P Supernovae

    F.S.Kitaura,H.Janka, andW.Hillebrandt,Astron.Astrophys. 450, 345 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0512065

  62. [62]

    D. L. Whittenbury, J. D. Carroll, A. W. Thomas, K. Tsushima, and J. R. Stone, Physical Review C89(2014), 10.1103/phys- revc.89.065801