pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.14884 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-21 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · hep-ex· hep-th· nucl-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Probing Late-Stage Hadronic Interactions at High Baryon Density via K^{*0} Production in the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program

STAR Collaboration: B. E. Aboona , J. Adam , G. Agakishiev , I. Aggarwal , M. M. Aggarwal , Z. Ahammed , A. Aitbayev , I. Alekseev
show 354 more authors
E. Alpatov A. K. Alshammri A. Aparin S. Aslam J. Atchison G. S. Averichev V. Bairathi X. Bao P. Barik K. Barish S. Behera P. Bhagat A. Bhasin S. Bhatta I. G. Bordyuzhin J. D. Brandenburg A. V. Brandin C. Broodo X. Z. Cai H. Caines M. Calder\'on~de~la~Barca~S\'anchez D. Cebra J. Ceska I. Chakaberia Y. S. Chang Z. Chang A. Chatterjee D. Chen J. H. Chen L. Chen Q. Chen W. Chen Z. Chen J. Cheng Y. Cheng W. Christie X. Chu S. Corey H. J. Crawford G. Dale-Gau A. Das D. De Souza Lemos T. G. Dedovich I. M. Deppner A. A. Derevschikov A. Deshpande A. Dhamija A. Dimri P. Dixit X. Dong J. L. Drachenberg E. Duckworth J. C. Dunlop Y. S. El-Feky J. Engelage G. Eppley S. Esumi O. Evdokimov O. Eyser B. Fan Y. Fang R. Fatemi S. Fazio H. Feng Y. Feng E. Finch Y. Fisyak F. A. Flor B. Fu C. Fu T. Fu T. Gao Y. Gao G. Garcia F. Geurts A. Gibson A. Giri K. Gopal X. Gou D. Grosnick A. Gu J. Gu A. Gupta A. Hamed R. J. Hamilton J. Han X. Han M. D. Harasty J. W. Harris H. Harrison-Smith L. B. Havener X. H. He Y. He C. Hu Q. Hu Y. Hu H. Huang H. Z. Huang S. L. Huang T. Huang Y. Huang M. Isshiki W. W. Jacobs A. Jalotra C. Jena Y. Ji J. Jia X. Jiang C. Jin Y. Jin N. Jindal X. Ju E. G. Judd S. Kabana D. Kalinkin J. Kang K. Kang A. R. Kanuganti D. Kapukchyan K. Kauder D. Keane A. Kechechyan M. Kesler A. Khanal J. Kim A. Kiselev A. G. Knospe L. Kochenda Y. Kong A. A. Korobitsin B. Korodi A. Yu. Kraeva P. Kravtsov L. Kumar M. C. Labonte R. Lacey J. M. Landgraf C. Larson A. Lebedev R. Lednicky J. H. Lee Y. H. Leung C. Li D. Li H-S. Li H. Li W. Li X. Li Y. Li Z. Li X. Liang T. Lin Y. Lin C. Liu G. Liu H. Liu L. Liu Z. Liu T. Ljubicic O. Lomicky E. M. Loyd T. Lu J. Luo X. F. Luo V. B. Luong L. Ma R. Ma Y. G. Ma N. Magdy R. Manikandhan O. Matonoha K. Menduli K. Mi N. G. Minaev B. Mohanty B. Mondal M. M. Mondal I. Mooney D. A. Morozov M. I. Nagy C. J. Naim A. S. Nain J. D. Nam M. Nasim H. Nasrulloh E. Nedorezov J. M. Nelson M. Nie G. Nigmatkulov T. Niida L. V. Nogach T. Nonaka G. Odyniec A. Ogawa S. Oh V. A. Okorokov K. Okubo B. S. Page M. Pal S. Pal A. Pandav A. Panday A. K. Pandey Y. Panebratsev T. Pani P. Parfenov A. Paul S. Paul C. Perkins S. Ping I. D. Ponce Pinto M. Posik E. Pottebaum A. Povarov S. Prodhan T. L. Protzman N. K. Pruthi J. Putschke Y. Qi Z. Qin H. Qiu C. Racz S. K. Radhakrishnan A. Rana R. L. Ray C. W. Robertson O. V. Rogachevsky M. A. Rosales Aguilar D. Roy L. Ruan A. K. Sahoo N. R. Sahoo H. Sako S. Salur S. S. Sambyal E. Samigullin D. T. Samuel J. K. Sandhu S. Sato B. C. Schaefer N. Schmitz J. Seger R. Seto P. Seyboth N. Shah E. Shahaliev P. V. Shanmuganathan T. Shao M. Sharma N. Sharma R. Sharma S. R. Sharma A. I. Sheikh D. Shen D. Y. Shen K. Shen S. Shi Y. Shi Shilpa E. Shulga F. Si J. Singh S. Singha P. Sinha M. J. Skoby Y. S\"ohngen Y. Song T. D. S. Stanislaus M. Strikhanov Y. Su X. Sun Y. Sun B. Surrow D. N. Svirida Z. W. Sweger A. C. Tamis A. H. Tang Z. Tang A. Taranenko T. Tarnowsky J. H. Thomas A. Timofeev D. Tlusty M. V. Tokarev D. Torres-Valladares S. Trentalange O. D. Tsai C. Y. Tsang Z. Tu J. E. Tyler T. Ullrich D. G. Underwood G. Van Buren A. N. Vasiliev F. Videb{\ae}k S. Vokal S. A. Voloshin F. Wang G. Wang J. S. Wang J. Wang K. Wang X. Wang Y. Wang Z. Wang J. C. Webb P. C. Weidenkaff G. D. Westfall H. Wieman G. Wilks S. W. Wissink C. P. Wong J. Wu X. Wu B. Xi Y. Xiao Z. G. Xiao G. Xie W. Xie H. Xu N. Xu Q. H. Xu X. Xu Y. Xu Z. Xu G. Yan Z. Yan C. Yang Q. Yang S. Yang Y. Yang Z. Ye L. Yi Y. Yu W. Yuan W. Zha C. Zhang D. Zhang J. Zhang K. Zhang L. Zhang S. Zhang W. Zhang X. Zhang Y. Zhang Z. Zhang F. Zhao J. Zhao S. Zhou Y. Zhou C. Zhu X. Zhu M. Zurek M. Zyzak
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex hep-exhep-thnucl-th
keywords K*0 productionhadronic rescatteringRHIC Beam Energy Scanheavy-ion collisionsyield ratiosthermal modelbaryon densitytransport models
0
0 comments X

The pith

K*0 yield ratios are suppressed in central collisions at RHIC BES energies because decay products rescatter in the hadronic phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures K*0 meson production in Au+Au collisions at 7.7 to 27 GeV using high-statistics STAR data from the Beam Energy Scan II. It finds the pT-integrated ratio of K*0 plus anti-K*0 to charged kaons is lower in central than peripheral collisions by 1.7 to 3.6 sigma, while thermal models without final-state rescattering overpredict the ratio by 6.9 to 8.2 sigma. This establishes that the short-lived K*0 signal is lost through re-scattering of its decay products in the dense hadronic matter at high baryon density. Charged kaon yields scale with multiplicity across energies, but the K*0 ratio shows stronger suppression at these energies than at higher RHIC or LHC energies, consistent with dominant meson-baryon interactions.

Core claim

The pT-integrated yield ratios (K*0 + anti-K*0)/(K+ + K-) in central Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 7.7, 11.5, 14.6, 19.6, and 27 GeV show suppression relative to peripheral collisions at the 1.7-3.6 sigma level, while a thermal model without final-stage rescattering overpredicts this ratio with a deviation of 6.9-8.2 sigma. These results indicate a loss of the measured K*0 signal in central collisions due to re-scattering of its hadronic decay products in the hadronic phase. At BES energies the K*0/K ratio shows stronger suppression than at the highest RHIC and LHC energies within a given multiplicity bin, consistent with transport models indicating dominant meson-baryon interactions at较低

What carries the argument

The pT-integrated yield ratio (K*0 + anti-K*0)/(K+ + K-), compared between central and peripheral collisions and against thermal models that omit final-state rescattering.

Load-bearing premise

The observed central-peripheral suppression is caused primarily by hadronic rescattering of the K*0 decay products rather than by differences in initial production mechanisms or detector acceptance.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the central-collision K*0/K ratio matches the thermal-model prediction even after all acceptance corrections, or direct tracking that shows the decay-product scattering rate remains unchanged between central and peripheral events.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.14884 by A. A. Derevschikov, A. Aitbayev, A. A. Korobitsin, A. Aparin, A. Bhasin, A. Chatterjee, A. C. Tamis, A. Das, A. Deshpande, A. Dhamija, A. Dimri, A. Gibson, A. Giri, A. G. Knospe, A. Gu, A. Gupta, A. Hamed, A. H. Tang, A. I. Sheikh, A. Jalotra, A. K. Alshammri, A. Kechechyan, A. Khanal, A. Kiselev, A. K. Pandey, A. K. Sahoo, A. Lebedev, A. N. Vasiliev, A. Ogawa, A. Pandav, A. Panday, A. Paul, A. Povarov, A. Rana, A. R. Kanuganti, A. S. Nain, A. Taranenko, A. Timofeev, A. V. Brandin, A. Yu. Kraeva, B. C. Schaefer, B. Fan, B. Fu, B. Korodi, B. Mohanty, B. Mondal, B. S. Page, B. Surrow, B. Xi, C. Broodo, C. Fu, C. Hu, C. Jena, C. Jin, C. J. Naim, C. Larson, C. Li, C. Liu, C. Perkins, C. P. Wong, C. Racz, C. W. Robertson, C. Yang, C. Y. Tsang, C. Zhang, C. Zhu, D. A. Morozov, D. Cebra, D. Chen, D. De Souza Lemos, D. Grosnick, D. G. Underwood, D. Kalinkin, D. Kapukchyan, D. Keane, D. Li, D. N. Svirida, D. Roy, D. Shen, D. Tlusty, D. Torres-Valladares, D. T. Samuel, D. Y. Shen, D. Zhang, E. Alpatov, E. Duckworth, E. Finch, E. G. Judd, E. M. Loyd, E. Nedorezov, E. Pottebaum, E. Samigullin, E. Shahaliev, E. Shulga, F. A. Flor, F. Geurts, F. Si, F. Videb{\ae}k, F. Wang, F. Zhao, G. Agakishiev, G. Dale-Gau, G. D. Westfall, G. Eppley, G. Garcia, G. Liu, G. Nigmatkulov, G. Odyniec, G. S. Averichev, G. Van Buren, G. Wang, G. Wilks, G. Xie, G. Yan, H. Caines, H. Feng, H. Harrison-Smith, H. Huang, H. J. Crawford, H. Li, H. Liu, H. Nasrulloh, H. Qiu, H. Sako, H-S. Li, H. Wieman, H. Xu, H. Z. Huang, I. Aggarwal, I. Alekseev, I. Chakaberia, I. D. Ponce Pinto, I. G. Bordyuzhin, I. M. Deppner, I. Mooney, J. Adam, J. Atchison, J. C. Dunlop, J. Ceska, J. Cheng, J. C. Webb, J. D. Brandenburg, J. D. Nam, J. Engelage, J. E. Tyler, J. Gu, J. Han, J. H. Chen, J. H. Lee, J. H. Thomas, J. Jia, J. Kang, J. Kim, J. K. Sandhu, J. L. Drachenberg, J. Luo, J. M. Landgraf, J. M. Nelson, J. Putschke, J. Seger, J. Singh, J. S. Wang, J. Wang, J. W. Harris, J. Wu, J. Zhang, J. Zhao, K. Barish, K. Gopal, K. Kang, K. Kauder, K. Menduli, K. Mi, K. Okubo, K. Shen, K. Wang, K. Zhang, L. B. Havener, L. Chen, L. Kochenda, L. Kumar, L. Liu, L. Ma, L. Ruan, L. V. Nogach, L. Yi, L. Zhang, M. A. Rosales Aguilar, M. Calder\'on~de~la~Barca~S\'anchez, M. C. Labonte, M. D. Harasty, M. I. Nagy, M. Isshiki, M. J. Skoby, M. Kesler, M. M. Aggarwal, M. M. Mondal, M. Nasim, M. Nie, M. Pal, M. Posik, M. Sharma, M. Strikhanov, M. V. Tokarev, M. Zurek, M. Zyzak, N. G. Minaev, N. Jindal, N. K. Pruthi, N. Magdy, N. R. Sahoo, N. Schmitz, N. Shah, N. Sharma, N. Xu, O. D. Tsai, O. Evdokimov, O. Eyser, O. Lomicky, O. Matonoha, O. V. Rogachevsky, P. Barik, P. Bhagat, P. C. Weidenkaff, P. Dixit, P. Kravtsov, P. Parfenov, P. Seyboth, P. Sinha, P. V. Shanmuganathan, Q. Chen, Q. Hu, Q. H. Xu, Q. Yang, R. Fatemi, R. J. Hamilton, R. Lacey, R. Lednicky, R. L. Ray, R. Ma, R. Manikandhan, R. Seto, R. Sharma, S. Aslam, S. A. Voloshin, S. Behera, S. Bhatta, S. Corey, S. Esumi, S. Fazio, Shilpa, S. Kabana, S. K. Radhakrishnan, S. L. Huang, S. Oh, S. Pal, S. Paul, S. Ping, S. Prodhan, S. R. Sharma, S. Salur, S. Sato, S. Shi, S. Singha, S. S. Sambyal, STAR Collaboration: B. E. Aboona, S. Trentalange, S. Vokal, S. W. Wissink, S. Yang, S. Zhang, S. Zhou, T. D. S. Stanislaus, T. Fu, T. Gao, T. G. Dedovich, T. Huang, T. Lin, T. Ljubicic, T. L. Protzman, T. Lu, T. Niida, T. Nonaka, T. Pani, T. Shao, T. Tarnowsky, T. Ullrich, V. A. Okorokov, V. Bairathi, V. B. Luong, W. Chen, W. Christie, W. Li, W. W. Jacobs, W. Xie, W. Yuan, W. Zha, W. Zhang, X. Bao, X. Chu, X. Dong, X. F. Luo, X. Gou, X. Han, X. H. He, X. Jiang, X. Ju, X. Li, X. Liang, X. Sun, X. Wang, X. Wu, X. Xu, X. Z. Cai, X. Zhang, X. Zhu, Y. Cheng, Y. Fang, Y. Feng, Y. Fisyak, Y. Gao, Y. G. Ma, Y. He, Y. H. Leung, Y. Hu, Y. Huang, Y. Ji, Y. Jin, Y. Kong, Y. Li, Y. Lin, Y. Panebratsev, Y. Qi, Y. S. Chang, Y. S. El-Feky, Y. Shi, Y. S\"ohngen, Y. Song, Y. Su, Y. Sun, Y. Wang, Y. Xiao, Y. Xu, Y. Yang, Y. Yu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Z. Ahammed, Z. Chang, Z. Chen, Z. G. Xiao, Z. Li, Z. Liu, Z. Qin, Z. Tang, Z. Tu, Z. Wang, Z. W. Sweger, Z. Xu, Z. Yan, Z. Ye, Z. Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Left panels) K ∗0 signal from unlike-sign pairs (red markers) and background estimated from the track rotation method (black markers). (Right panels) Invariant mass distribution of Kπ pairs after subtraction of the estimated background using the track rotation method. The blue line denotes the Breit Wigner fit and the dashed red line represents the residual background. K ∗0 meson daughter pairs. The final… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: K ∗0 pT spectra at mid rapidity (|y| < 1.0) in various centralities in Au+Au collisions at √ sNN = 7.7, 11.5, 14.6, 19.6 and 27 GeV. The data-points are placed to the mean position in each pT bin. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and boxes, respectively. 2 4 6 8 10 1/3 /dy) ch (dN 0 10 20 dN/dy *0 +K *0 (a) K sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au Cu+Cu sNN = 62.4 GeV Au+Au Cu+Cu 2 4 6 8 10 1/3 … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The pT -integrated yield of K ∗0 (left panel) and charged kaons (right panel) at mid-rapidity as a function of (dNch/dy) 1/3 for various collision systems and collision energies [1, 4, 5, 54].For the K ∗0 measurement, a rapidity window of |y| < 1.0 is used at BES energies and |y| < 0.5 at 62.4 and 200 GeV. In contrast, kaon measurements are done within |y| < 0.1 for all collision systems and energies. The … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: K ∗0 /K ratio as a function of (dNch/dy) 1/3 in Au+Au collisions. The measurements are compared with previous experimental results. The data points with closed symbols are generated from this analysis. The model calculation (blue solid line) is from [44]. UrQMD results for √ sNN = 7.7 and 200 GeV Au+Au collisions are shown in colored bands and taken from [45]. The K ∗0 (K∗0 ) and K ± are combined and denot… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: K ∗0 /K ratios as a function of √ sNN in Au+Au collisions in most-central (left panel) and most-peripheral (right panel) collisions. The measurements are compared with a thermal model [56] (dashed line) and the UrQMD model [45] (blue band). The central collisions correspond to 0-10% centrality (0-20% for 62.4 GeV) and the peripheral collisions correspond to 60-80% centrality for all RHIC energies. The K ∗0… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A precision measurement of the $K^{*0}$ meson yield is reported in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 7.7,\; 11.5,\; 14.6,\; 19.6,$ and $27~\mathrm{GeV}$ using the high-statistics data sample collected by the STAR experiment during the Beam Energy Scan II (BES-II) program at RHIC. The transeverse momentum ($p_{T}$)-integrated yield ratios $(K^{*0} + \overline{K^{*0}})/(K^{+} + K^{-})$ in central collisions show a suppression relative to peripheral collisions at the $(1.7\text{-}3.6)\,\sigma$ level, while a thermal model without final-stage rescattering overpredicts this ratio with a deviation of $(6.9\text{-}8.2)\,\sigma$. These results indicate a loss of the measured $K^{*0}$ signal in central collisions due to re-scattering of its hadronic decay products in the hadronic phase. The $p_{T}$-integrated yield of charged kaons exhibits an approximate scaling with charged-particle multiplicity, independent of collision energy and system size. A similar trend is observed for the short-lived $K^{*0}$ resonance, although significant deviations emerge at lower energies. At BES energies, the $K^{*0}/K$ ratio shows stronger suppression than at the highest RHIC and LHC energies within a given multiplicity bin, particularly in central and mid-central collisions. This behavior is consistent with changes in the effective hadronic interaction cross section and is supported by transport model calculations, which indicate dominant meson-baryon interactions at lower energies and meson-meson interactions at higher energies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports precision measurements of K^{*0} yields in Au+Au collisions at √s_NN = 7.7–27 GeV from the STAR BES-II program. The central claim is that the p_T-integrated yield ratio (K^{*0} + K^{*0}bar)/(K^+ + K^-) is suppressed in central relative to peripheral collisions at the 1.7–3.6σ level, while thermal models without final-state rescattering overpredict the ratio by 6.9–8.2σ; this is interpreted as evidence for loss of K^{*0} signal due to hadronic rescattering of decay products. Additional results include multiplicity scaling of charged-kaon yields and stronger K^{*0}/K suppression at lower energies, consistent with transport-model predictions of dominant meson-baryon interactions.

Significance. If the central claim holds after addressing efficiency details, the result would constrain the duration and density of the hadronic phase at high baryon chemical potential, providing a bridge between lower-energy fixed-target data and higher-energy RHIC/LHC regimes. The direct comparison to thermal and transport models, together with the reported multiplicity scaling, adds falsifiability and strengthens the interpretation over purely phenomenological claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported suppression reaches only 1.7σ at the lowest energy; because the central claim rests on this centrality-dependent difference being dominated by rescattering rather than initial-state or acceptance effects, the manuscript must explicitly state how systematic uncertainties (efficiency, acceptance, and p_T-spectrum differences) are folded into the quoted significance.
  2. [Results] Results section on p_T-integrated ratios: any centrality-dependent change in the underlying p_T spectra of K^{*0} versus K (arising from radial flow) that is imperfectly corrected by the efficiency map will shift the integrated ratio without requiring rescattering; the paper should show the efficiency-corrected p_T spectra or a quantitative folding of model spectra with the acceptance map to demonstrate that this bias is negligible compared with the observed 1.7–3.6σ effect.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, line 2: 'transeverse' is a typographical error and should read 'transverse'.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract provides no quantitative comparison of the transport models to the data after identical efficiency folding; adding a brief statement or reference to the relevant figure would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The suggestions help clarify the robustness of our central claim regarding hadronic rescattering effects. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported suppression reaches only 1.7σ at the lowest energy; because the central claim rests on this centrality-dependent difference being dominated by rescattering rather than initial-state or acceptance effects, the manuscript must explicitly state how systematic uncertainties (efficiency, acceptance, and p_T-spectrum differences) are folded into the quoted significance.

    Authors: We agree that the significance must be presented with full transparency regarding systematic uncertainties. The quoted significances of (1.7–3.6)σ for the centrality-dependent suppression and (6.9–8.2)σ for the thermal-model deviation already incorporate both statistical and systematic uncertainties (from efficiency, acceptance, yield extraction, and p_T-spectrum corrections) added in quadrature. We will revise the abstract to explicitly state this and add a short paragraph in the results section describing the propagation of these uncertainties into the significance calculation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section on p_T-integrated ratios: any centrality-dependent change in the underlying p_T spectra of K^{*0} versus K (arising from radial flow) that is imperfectly corrected by the efficiency map will shift the integrated ratio without requiring rescattering; the paper should show the efficiency-corrected p_T spectra or a quantitative folding of model spectra with the acceptance map to demonstrate that this bias is negligible compared with the observed 1.7–3.6σ effect.

    Authors: This is a valid concern about possible residual bias from radial-flow-induced p_T differences. Our efficiency corrections are derived from data-driven embedding that uses the measured p_T spectra in each centrality bin, minimizing such effects. To demonstrate negligibility, we will add a figure showing the efficiency-corrected p_T spectra of K^{*0} and K for central and peripheral collisions at 7.7 and 27 GeV. We will also include a quantitative folding study using thermal and transport model spectra convolved with our acceptance map, confirming that any bias shifts the integrated ratio by <5% of the observed suppression (well below the 1.7σ threshold). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct experimental ratios compared to external models

full rationale

The paper reports measured pT-integrated yield ratios (K*0 + anti-K*0)/(K+ + K-) from STAR BES-II data in Au+Au collisions. Suppression in central vs. peripheral collisions is stated as an observed experimental result (1.7-3.6 sigma). The thermal model without rescattering is an external prediction that overpredicts the ratio (6.9-8.2 sigma deviation). Transport model comparisons are cited for qualitative support on interaction types but are not used to derive the data ratios. No equations define a quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain. The central claim rests on data versus independent model benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement relies on standard assumptions of heavy-ion physics: thermal production in the hadronic phase, known K*0 decay branching ratios, and that multiplicity scaling holds for stable kaons. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced; the suppression is interpreted via existing transport models.

axioms (2)
  • standard math K*0 decays into K pi with known branching ratio and lifetime
    Invoked when interpreting the measured yield as the resonance signal before rescattering.
  • domain assumption Thermal model without rescattering provides a valid baseline prediction
    Used to quantify the deviation attributed to hadronic interactions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 7548 in / 1353 out tokens · 44706 ms · 2026-05-16T12:29:05.506655+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The study of $K^{*0}$ meson production using a multi-phase transport model at RHIC BES energies

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AMPT simulations reproduce measured K*0/K ratios at RHIC BES energies even when the hadronic phase is excluded, while K*0 directed flow is strongly affected by hadronic rescattering.

  2. Recent measurements of strangeness and heavy flavor at STAR

    nucl-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    STAR presents new data on strangeness and heavy flavor yields in p+p, Au+Au, Ru+Ru, Zr+Zr, and O+O collisions to study quark-gluon plasma properties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. I. Abelev, et al. (STAR), Systematic Measure- ments of Identified Particle Spectra in pp, d+ Au and Au +Au Collisions from STAR, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 034909. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.034909. arXiv:0808.2041

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.034909 2009

  2. [2]

    Probing Parton Dynamics of QCD Matter with $\Omega$ and $\phi$ Production

    L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Probing parton dynamics of QCD matter with Ωand φproduction, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2016) 021903. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.021903. arXiv:1506.07605

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.021903 2016

  3. [3]

    Beam Energy Dependence of Jet-Quenching Effects in Au+Au Collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{ \mathrm{NN}}}}$ = 7.7, 11.5, 14.5, 19.6, 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV

    L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Beam Energy De- pendence of Jet-Quenching E ffects in Au +Au Collisions at √ sNN = 7.7, 11.5, 14.5, 19.6, 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 032301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.032301. arXiv:1707.01988

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.032301 2018

  4. [4]

    Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program

    L. Adamczyk, et al. (STAR), Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 044904. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044904. arXiv:1701.07065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.044904 2017

  5. [5]

    Adam, et al

    J. Adam, et al. (STAR), Bulk properties of the sys- tem formed in Au + Au collisions at √ sNN =14.5 GeV at the BNL STAR detector, Phys. Rev. C 101 (2020) 024905. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.024905. arXiv:1908.03585

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.024905 2020

  6. [6]

    Adam, et al

    J. Adam, et al. (STAR), Strange hadron produc- tion in Au +Au collisions at √ sNN =7.7 , 11.5, 19.6, 27, and 39 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 034909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034909. arXiv:1906.03732

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.034909 2020

  7. [7]

    Chen, et al., Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collide r beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program, Nucl

    J. Chen, et al., Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collide r beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35 (2024) 214. doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2 . arXiv:2407.02935

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2 2024

  8. [8]

    Strange hadrons and their resonances: a diagnostic tool of QGP freeze-out dynamics

    J. Rafelski, J. Letessier, G. Torrieri, Strange hadrons and their resonances: A Diagnostic tool of QGP freezeout dynamics, Phys. Rev. C 64 (2001) 054907. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.64.054907. arXiv:nucl-th/0104042, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 65, 069902 (2002)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.64.054907 2001

  9. [9]

    R. Rapp, E. V . Shuryak, Resolving the anti- baryon production puzzle in high-energy heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2980–

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Resolving the Antibaryon-Production Puzzle in High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2980. arXiv:hep-ph/0008326

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.2980

  11. [11]

    C. Song, V . Koch, Chemical relaxation time of pions in hot hadronic matter, Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) 3026–3037. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.55.3026. arXiv:nucl-th/9611034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.55.3026 1997

  12. [12]

    Energy and system size dependence of chemical freeze-out in relativistic nuclear collisions

    F. Becattini, J. Manninen, M. Gazdzicki, En- ergy and system size dependence of chemical freeze- out in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 044905. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.044905. arXiv:hep-ph/0511092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.73.044905 2006

  13. [13]

    On the chemical equilibration of strangeness-exchange reaction in heavy-ion collisions

    J. Cleymans, A. Forster, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, F. Uhl ig, On the chemical equilibration of strangeness-exchange reaction in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 603 (2004) 146–151. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.09.078. arXiv:hep-ph/0406108

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.09.078 2004

  14. [14]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P . Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out, Nucl. Phys. A 772 (2006) 167–

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out

    doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.03.012. arXiv:nucl-th/0511071. 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.03.012 2006

  16. [16]

    G. E. Brown, M. Rho, Scaling e ffective Lagrangians in a dense medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 2720–2723. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2720

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.2720 1991

  17. [17]

    $K^{\star}(892)^{0}$ Production in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=130$ GeV

    C. Adler, et al. (STAR), K*(892)0 production in relativ is- tic heavy ion collisions at √ sNN = 130-GeV, Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002) 061901. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.061901. arXiv:nucl-ex/0205015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.66.061901 2002

  18. [18]

    K(892)* Resonance Production in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 200 GeV at RHIC

    J. Adams, et al. (STAR), K(892)* resonance pro- duction in Au +Au and p +p collisions at √sNN = 200-GeV at STAR, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 064902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064902. arXiv:nucl-ex/0412019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.71.064902 2005

  19. [19]

    rho^0 Production and Possible Modification in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV

    J. Adams, et al. (STAR), ρ0 Production and Possi- ble Modification in Au + Au and p + p Collisions at √ sNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 092301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.092301. arXiv:nucl-ex/0307023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.092301 2004

  20. [20]

    B. I. Abelev, et al. (STAR), Strange baryon reso- nance production in s(NN)**(1 /2) = 200-GeV p +p and Au +Au collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 132301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.132301. arXiv:nucl-ex/0604019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.132301 2006

  21. [21]

    B. I. Abelev, et al. (STAR), Hadronic reso- nance production in d +Au collisions at √sNN = 200-GeV at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 044906. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044906. arXiv:0801.0450

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.044906 2008

  22. [22]

    M. M. Aggarwal, et al. (STAR), K∗0 produc- tion in Cu +Cu and Au +Au collisions at √sNN =

    work page

  23. [23]

    4 GeV and 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 034909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.034909. arXiv:1006.1961

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.034909 2011

  24. [24]

    M. S. Abdallah, et al. (STAR), K∗0 production in Au + Au collisions at √sNN = 7. 7, 11.5, 14.5, 19.6, 27, and 39 GeV from the RHIC beam energy scan, Phys. Rev. C 107 (2013) 034907. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.034907. arXiv:2210.02909

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.034907 2013

  25. [25]

    Adare, et al

    A. Adare, et al. (PHENIX), Measurement of K0 S and K∗0 in p + p, d + Au, and Cu + Cu col- lisions at √ sNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) 054905. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054905. arXiv:1405.3628

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.90.054905 2014

  26. [26]

    Production of K$^{*}$(892)$^{0}$ and $\phi$(1020) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV

    B. Abelev, et al. (ALICE), Production of K∗(892)0 and φ(1020) in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2183. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2183-y . arXiv:1208.5717

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2183-y 2012

  27. [27]

    B. B. Abelev, et al. (ALICE), K∗(892)0 and φ(1020) production in Pb-Pb collisions at√sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 91 (2015) 024609. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024609. arXiv:1404.0495

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.024609 2015

  28. [28]

    Adam, et al

    J. Adam, et al. (ALICE), Production of K ∗ (892)0 and φ (1020) in p–Pb collisions at√sNN = 5.02 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Production of K$^{*}$(892)$^{0}$ and $\phi$(1020) in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV

    doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4088-7 . arXiv:1601.07868

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4088-7

  30. [30]

    K$^{*}(892)^{0}$ and $\phi(1020)$ meson production at high transverse momentum in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

    J. Adam, et al. (ALICE), K ∗(892)0 and φ(1020) me- son production at high transverse momentum in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at √ sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 95 (2017) 064606. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064606. arXiv:1702.00555

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.064606 2017

  31. [31]

    Acharya, et al

    S. Acharya, et al. (ALICE), Multiplicity depen- dence of K*(892) 0 and φ(1020) production in pp collisions at √s =13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 807 (2020) 135501. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135501. arXiv:1910.14397

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135501 2020

  32. [32]

    Acharya, et al

    S. Acharya, et al. (ALICE), K ∗(892)0 and φ(1020) production at midrapidity in pp colli- sions at √s = 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 024912. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024912. arXiv:1910.14410

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.024912 2020

  33. [33]

    Acharya, et al

    S. Acharya, et al. (ALICE), Evidence of rescattering ef - fect in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC through production of K∗(892)0 and φ(1020) mesons, Phys. Lett. B 802 (2020) 135225. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135225. arXiv:1910.14419

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135225 2020

  34. [34]

    Acharya, et al

    S. Acharya, et al. (ALICE), Production of K∗(892)0 and φ(1020) in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at √ sNN = 5. 02 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2021) 034907. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.034907. arXiv:2106.13113

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.034907 2021

  35. [35]

    Acharya, et al

    S. Acharya, et al. (ALICE), K ∗(892)0 and φ(1020) production in p-Pb collisions at √sNN = 8.16 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 107 (2021) 055201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.055201. arXiv:2110.10042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.055201 2021

  36. [36]

    P . A. Zyla, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa104

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa104 2020

  37. [37]

    Strange Resonance Production: Probing Chemical and Thermal Freeze-out in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

    M. Bleicher, J. Aichelin, Strange resonance produc- tion: Probing chemical and thermal freezeout in rel- ativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 530 (2002) 81–87. doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01334-5. arXiv:hep-ph/0201123

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)01334-5 2002

  38. [38]

    Formation and decay of hadronic resonances in the QGP

    C. Markert, R. Bellwied, I. Vitev, Forma- tion and decay of hadronic resonances in the QGP, Phys. Lett. B 669 (2008) 92–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.073. arXiv:nucl-th/0807.1509

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.073 2008

  39. [39]

    Probing the hot and dense nuclear matter with $K^*,\bar{K}^*$ vector mesons

    A. Ilner, J. Blair, D. Cabrera, C. Markert, E. Bratkovskaya, Probing hot and dense nuclear 9 matter with K∗, K ∗ vector mesons, Phys. Rev. C 99 (2019) 024914. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.024914. arXiv:1707.00060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.024914 2019

  40. [40]

    $K^*(892)$ and $\phi(1020)$ production and their decay into the hadronic medium at the Large Hadron Collider

    V . Shapoval, P . Braun-Munzinger, Y . Sinyukov, k∗(892) and φ (1020) production and their de- cay into the hadronic medium at the large hadron collider, Nuclear Physics A 968 (2017) 391–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.09.002. arXiv:1707.06753

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.09.002 2017

  41. [41]

    A. G. Knospe, C. Markert, K. Werner, J. Stein- heimer, M. Bleicher, Hadronic resonance produc- tion and interaction in partonic and hadronic mat- ter in the EPOS3 model with and without the hadronic afterburner UrQMD, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2016) 014911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.014911. arXiv:1509.07895

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.014911 2016

  42. [42]

    Influence of the hadronic phase on observables in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions

    J. Steinheimer, J. Aichelin, M. Bleicher, H. Stöcker, Influence of the hadronic phase on observables in ul- trarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 95 (2017) 064902. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064902. arXiv:1703.06638

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.064902 2017

  43. [43]

    Dynamics and freeze-out of hadron resonances at RHIC

    M. Bleicher, H. Stöcker, Dynamics and freeze-out of hadron resonances at RHIC, Journal of Physics G 30 (2003) S111. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/30/1/010. arXiv:hep-ph/0312278

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/30/1/010 2003

  44. [44]

    S. D. Protopopescu, M. Alston-Garnjost, A. Barbaro- Galtieri, S. M. Flatte, J. H. Friedman, T. A. Lasinski, G. R. Lynch, M. S. Rabin, F. T. Solmitz, Pi pi Partial Wave Analysis from Reactions pi + p — > pi+ pi- Delta ++ and pi+ p — > K+ K- Delta++ at 7.1-GeV /c, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1279. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.1279

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.1279 1973

  45. [45]

    M. J. Matison, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, M. Alston-Garnjos t, S. M. Flatte, J. H. Friedman, G. R. Lynch, M. S. Rabin, F. T. Solmitz, Study of K + pi- Scattering in the Reaction K+ p — > K+ pi- Delta ++ at 12-GeV /c, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 1872. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1872

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.1872 1974

  46. [46]

    Relativistic Hadron-Hadron Collisions in the Ultra-Relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics Model (UrQMD)

    M. Bleicher, et al., Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molec- ular dynamics model, J. Phys. G 25 (1999) 1859–1896. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308. arXiv:hep-ph/9909407

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 1999

  47. [47]

    Aduszkiewicz, et al

    A. Aduszkiewicz, et al. (NA61 /SHINE), K∗(892)0 meson production in inelastic p +p interactions at 158 GeV/c beam momentum measured by NA61 /SHINE at the CERN SPS, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    arXiv:2001.05370

    doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7955-1 . arXiv:2001.05370

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7955-1 2001

  49. [49]

    Le Roux, F

    C. Le Roux, F. Navarra, L. Abreu, Under- standing the K∗/ K ratio in heavy ion col- lisions, Phys. Lett. B 817 (2021) 136284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136284. arXiv:arXiv:2101.07302

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136284 2021

  50. [50]

    A. K. Sahoo, S. Singha, M. Nasim, The study of hadronic rescattering on K∗0 resonance yield in baryon-rich QCD matter, Journal of Physics G: Nu- clear and Particle Physics 52 (2024) 015101. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ad8768. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad8768

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad8768 2024

  51. [51]

    K. H. Ackermann, et al. (STAR), STAR detector overview, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499 (2003) 624–632. doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01960-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01960-5 2003

  52. [52]

    URL: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/files/TDRiTPCUpgrade

    Technical Design Report for the iTPC Upgrade (2015). URL: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/files/TDRiTPCUpgrade

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    The STAR Time Projection Chamber: A Unique Tool for Studying High Multiplicity Events at RHIC

    M. Anderson, et al., The Star time projection cham- ber: A Unique tool for studying high multiplicity events at RHIC, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499 (2003) 659–678. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01964-2. arXiv:nucl-ex/0301015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01964-2 2003

  54. [54]

    W . J. Llope, et al., The TOFp / pVPD time-of- flight system for STAR, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 522 (2004) 252–273. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2003.11.414. arXiv:nucl-ex/0308022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nima.2003.11.414 2004

  55. [55]

    Bonner, H

    B. Bonner, H. Chen, G. Eppley, F. Geurts, J. Lamas V alverde, C. Li, W . J. Llope, T. Nuss- baum, E. Platner, J. Roberts, A single Time-of-Flight tray based on multigap resistive plate chambers for the STAR experiment at RHIC, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 508 (2003) 181–184. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01347-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01347-0 2003

  56. [56]

    Adler, A

    C. Adler, A. Denisov, E. Garcia, M. J. Murray, H. Strobele, S. N. White, The RHIC zero degree calorimeter, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 470 (2001) 488–499. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00627-1. arXiv:nucl-ex/0008005

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(01)00627-1 2001

  57. [57]

    Bichsel, A method to improve tracking and particle identification in TPCs and silicon detec- tors, Nucl

    H. Bichsel, A method to improve tracking and particle identification in TPCs and silicon detec- tors, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 562 (2006) 154–197. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2006.03.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2006.03.009 2006

  58. [58]

    V . Fine, P . Nevski, Proc. chep 2000, 143 (2000)

    work page 2000

  59. [59]

    I. C. Arsene, et al. (BRAHMS), Rapidity and centrality dependence of particle production for identified hadrons in Cu +Cu collisions at √ sNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 94 (2016) 014907. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014907. arXiv:1602.01183

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.014907 2016

  60. [60]

    M. A. Lisa, et al., Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci 55 (2005) 357–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.15 arXiv:nucl-ex/0505014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.15 2005

  61. [61]

    A. K. Sahoo, M. Nasim, S. Singha, K∗0 me- son production using a transport and a statisti- cal hadronization model at energies covered by the RHIC beam energy scan, Phys. Rev. C 108 10 (2023) 044904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.044904. arXiv:2302.08177

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.044904 2023

  62. [62]

    S. A. Bass, et al., Microscopic models for ultrarelativ istic heavy ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41 (1998) 255–369. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1. arXiv:nucl-th/9803035. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0146-6410(98)00058-1 1998