arxiv: 2602.10900 · v4 · submitted 2026-02-11 · 💻 cs.NI

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

AI Infrastructure Sovereignty

Sergio Cruzes

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI

keywords AI infrastructuresovereigntydata centersoptical networksenergy constraintscontrol frameworkssustainability

0 comments

The pith

Real AI sovereignty requires joint control over data centers, optical networks, and energy systems to operate within physical and environmental limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that control over data and algorithms alone does not deliver AI sovereignty. Instead, sovereignty requires the capacity to deploy, operate, and adapt infrastructure under constraints of energy availability, sustainability, and network reach. This capacity arises when AI-oriented data centers, optical transport networks, and control frameworks are designed and operated together in a closed loop. A reader would care because scaling AI workloads now collides directly with power densities, cooling needs, carbon intensity, and latency limits that determine where and how AI can actually run.

Core claim

AI infrastructure sovereignty is defined as the ability of a region, operator, or nation to maintain operational control over AI systems within constraints such as energy availability, sustainability requirements, and network reach. Sovereignty emerges from the joint design of three layers: AI-oriented data centers that handle rising power densities and cooling demands, optical transport networks that serve as the backbone for distributed AI with limits on latency and capacity, and control frameworks using telemetry, agentic AI, and digital twins to provide real-time visibility and coordination across compute, network, and energy domains.

What carries the argument

The joint design of AI-oriented data centers, optical transport networks, and control frameworks that enable closed-loop monitoring and coordination across compute, network, and energy domains.

If this is right

AI workloads will drive data centers toward higher power densities that tie deployment locations directly to local energy systems and metrics such as carbon intensity and water usage.
Optical networks will set practical bounds on distributed AI through their effects on latency, capacity, failure domains, and cross-border reach.
Telemetry combined with agentic AI and digital twins will supply the visibility needed to monitor and adjust system behavior across all three layers in real time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Infrastructure planning would need to precede or run in parallel with algorithmic development if regions aim to retain operational AI control.
Policy discussions on AI would expand to include physical resource mapping, such as siting data centers near reliable low-carbon power sources.
Testing the idea could involve controlled simulations of energy-constrained distributed training to measure whether closed-loop coordination actually prevents performance collapse.

Load-bearing premise

The three layers of data centers, optical networks, and control frameworks can be jointly designed and operated without unresolved conflicts between energy limits, latency requirements, and jurisdictional boundaries.

What would settle it

A deployed AI system where energy availability or jurisdictional rules force a performance trade-off that no coordination mechanism across the three layers can resolve while still meeting target latency and throughput.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.10900 by Sergio Cruzes.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: AI sovereignty shifts from software-centric to infrastructure-centric control as scale, energy, and sustainability constraints become binding. The left panel shows software-centric sovereignty — legal control over data (GDPR, CLOUD Act), model IP, jurisdiction, and governance — which is necessary but insufficient at AI scale. The three central drivers (scale at MW-class power demand, energy including grid … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: From AI workloads to physical infrastructure constraints. Synchronized training and large-scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Optical networks as the backbone of AI sovereignty. Metro, regional, long-haul, and submarine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The green-but-far effect: carbon intensity and latency as competing placement constraints across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Telemetry-driven closed-loop control with agentic AI for sovereign infrastructure operation. Three telemetry streams — infrastructure, network, and sustainability — feed the observability layer, which assembles the unified state representation θ(t) through streaming normalization, timestamp alignment, freshness certification, and cross-domain fusion. A locally defined policy specification bounds agent auth… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Reference architecture for AI infrastructure sovereignty, organized across four functional layers. The physical layer (Layer 1) provides AI data centers, optical transport, and energy systems with tight cross-domain coupling. The observability layer (Layer 2) streams, normalizes, and time-aligns cross-domain telemetry into the unified infrastructure state representation θ(t). The control layer (Layer 3) a… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: compute and power state, optical KPIs, sustainability signals, and the resulting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Sustainability-aware automation and policy feedback, organized by characteristic timescale of constraint and control action. The horizontal axis spans four timescale zones — subhourly, daily, seasonal, and multi-year — reflecting the characteristic update rate of each sustainability signal and the frequency at which corresponding control actions must operate. Row 1 shows the telemetry inputs feeding each … view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The autonomy–scale trade-off in sovereign AI infrastructure. Each vertex represents a primary objective: operational sovereignty (top), sustainability compliance (bottom left), and AI performance (bottom right). Nested regions show progressively tighter feasible spaces: the theoretical space with no binding constraints (outer, dashed grey), the constrained feasible space under regulatory and physical limi… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence has shifted from a software-centric discipline to an infrastructure-driven system. Training and inference at scale now depend on tightly connected data centers, high-capacity optical networks, and energy systems operating close to their physical and environmental limits. In this context, control over data and algorithms is not enough. Real AI sovereignty depends on the ability to deploy, operate, and adapt infrastructure under constraints such as energy availability, sustainability requirements, and network reach. This tutorial-survey introduces the concept of AI infrastructure sovereignty, defined as the ability of a region, operator, or nation to maintain operational control over AI systems within these constraints. The central idea is that sovereignty emerges from the joint design of three layers: AI-oriented data centers, optical transport networks, and control frameworks that provide real-time visibility and coordination across them. We first examine how AI workloads are reshaping data center design, pushing power densities higher, increasing cooling demands, and tightening the relationship with local energy systems. In this setting, factors such as carbon intensity and water usage become hard limits on where and how AI can be deployed. We then look at optical networks as the backbone of distributed AI, showing how latency, capacity, failure domains, and jurisdictional boundaries directly influence what can be achieved in practice. Building on this foundation, the paper highlights the role of telemetry, agentic AI, and digital twins as key enablers of operational sovereignty. Together, they make it possible to monitor, coordinate, and validate system behavior across compute, network, and energy domains in a closed loop.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a survey that coins 'AI infrastructure sovereignty' to link data-center power limits, optical networks for distributed AI, and telemetry controls, but it stays conceptual with no new data or mechanisms.

read the letter

Hi, this paper's main contribution is a framing exercise: it defines AI infrastructure sovereignty as the ability to control deployment and operation of AI systems under real constraints like energy availability, carbon intensity, and network reach. The idea is that this control comes from jointly designing three layers—AI-oriented data centers, optical transport networks, and closed-loop control frameworks using telemetry and digital twins. It walks through how AI workloads drive higher power densities and cooling needs, how optical links determine feasible latency and failure domains for distributed training, and how real-time visibility tools could coordinate across domains. That synthesis is the useful part; it pulls together trends that network and infrastructure people already know but rarely see in one place with a policy angle. The sections on each layer are clear and cite the relevant prior work without overclaiming. The soft spots are straightforward. There are no measurements, simulations, or derivations to test whether the three layers can actually be operated in a closed loop without hard conflicts between energy caps, latency targets, and cross-border rules. The central claim stays definitional rather than demonstrated, so the paper does not resolve any open technical question. It is aimed at readers who work on national AI strategies, large operator planning, or cross-disciplinary infrastructure policy. A technical specialist looking for new protocols, algorithms, or empirical results will find little to use. It deserves a serious referee as a survey because the framing is coherent and could help organize future discussions, even if the paper itself is not a research advance. I would send it out with clear instructions to treat it as a tutorial rather than a novel contribution.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the concept of AI infrastructure sovereignty, defined as the ability of a region, operator, or nation to maintain operational control over AI systems under constraints such as energy availability, sustainability requirements, and network reach. It argues that this sovereignty emerges from the joint design of three layers: AI-oriented data centers (with rising power densities and cooling demands tied to local energy systems), optical transport networks (influenced by latency, capacity, failure domains, and jurisdictional boundaries), and control frameworks using telemetry, agentic AI, and digital twins for real-time visibility and closed-loop coordination across domains. The manuscript is structured as a tutorial-survey examining these elements in sequence without new derivations, data, or predictions.

Significance. If the conceptual framing holds, the paper offers a useful synthesis for connecting AI compute demands with networking and energy infrastructure limits, potentially informing engineering and policy discussions on operational control in distributed AI systems. Its value lies in organizing existing knowledge around a new term rather than advancing testable models or empirical findings, which tempers its technical novelty but supports its role as a high-level survey in the networks field.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: the definition of AI infrastructure sovereignty is presented clearly but could be strengthened by briefly contrasting it with related terms such as digital sovereignty or data sovereignty to highlight its distinct infrastructure focus.
The manuscript lacks an explicit roadmap or section outline (typically at the end of the introduction) that maps the discussion of the three layers, which would improve readability for a tutorial-style survey.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of the manuscript as a useful high-level synthesis that organizes existing knowledge around the concept of AI infrastructure sovereignty. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and note that the referee correctly characterizes the paper as a tutorial-survey without new derivations or empirical predictions. Since no specific major comments were provided, we interpret the minor-revision recommendation as an invitation for any editorial polishing the editor may require; we are prepared to make such adjustments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely definitional framing

full rationale

The paper is a tutorial-survey that explicitly introduces 'AI infrastructure sovereignty' as a conceptual definition: the ability to maintain operational control under energy, sustainability, and network constraints, emerging from joint design of data centers, optical networks, and control frameworks. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, simulations, or quantitative derivations appear in the provided text. The central claim is presented as an organizing definition drawing on established infrastructure facts rather than reducing any output to inputs by construction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps. This matches the default expectation of no circularity for descriptive survey papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that infrastructure constraints are now the binding limits on AI deployment and that joint design of the three layers is feasible; the main addition is the invented framing term itself.

axioms (1)

domain assumption AI workloads are reshaping data center design by pushing power densities higher and tightening relationships with local energy systems
Invoked in the abstract as the starting point for the sovereignty definition.

invented entities (1)

AI infrastructure sovereignty no independent evidence
purpose: A new framing term for operational control over AI under physical and environmental constraints
Defined in the abstract as emerging from the joint design of the three layers; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 1372 out tokens · 70988 ms · 2026-05-16T02:51:57.726724+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Real AI sovereignty depends on the ability to deploy, operate, and adapt infrastructure under constraints such as energy availability, sustainability requirements, and network reach, emerging from the joint design of AI-oriented data centers, optical transport networks, and control frameworks.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

telemetry, agentic AI, and digital twins as key enablers of operational sovereignty... closed loop

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Sustainability-Constrained Workload Orchestration for Sovereign AI Infrastructure: A Joint Compute-Network Optimization Framework
cs.NI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Introduces the Feasible Sovereign Operating Region (FSOR) as a construct for workloads sustainable under physical and regulatory limits, along with a joint compute-network optimization framework that enforces sustaina...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training

D. Patterson, J. Gonzalez, Q. Le, C. Liang, L. Munguia, D. Rothchild, D. So, M. Tex- ier, J. Dean, Carbon emissions and large neural network training, arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350 (2021)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[2]

URL https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings/data-centres-and-data- transmission-networks

International Energy Agency (IEA), Data centres and data transmission networks, accessed: 2026-01-30 (2024). URL https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings/data-centres-and-data- transmission-networks

work page 2026
[3]

X. Chen, X. Wang, A. Colacelli, M. Lee, L. Xie, Electricity demand and grid impacts of ai data centers: Challenges and prospects, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07218 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

Hoxha, M

J. Hoxha, M. Thanasi-Boçe, T. Khalifa, A deployment-aware framework for carbon- and water-eﬃcient llm serving, Sustainability 17 (23) (2025) 10473. April 22, 2026

work page 2025
[5]

Shehabi, S

A. Shehabi, S. J. Smith, A. Hubbard, A. Newkirk, N. Lei, M. A. B. Siddik, B. Holecek, J. Koomey, E. Masanet, D. Sartor, 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report, Tech. Rep. LBNL-2001637, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, accessed: 2026-01-23 (dec 2024). URL https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/ﬁles/2024-12/lb...

work page 2024
[6]

European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data (general data protection regulation), Tech. Rep. L 119, Oﬃcial Journal of the European Union, oJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1–88 (2016). URL https://eur-...

work page 2016
[7]

4943, 115th Congress, pub

United States Congress, Clarifying lawful overseas use of data act (CLOUD act), H.R. 4943, 115th Congress, pub. L. No. 115-141, div. V, 132 Stat. 348 (2018). URL https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4943

work page 2018
[8]

FutureCIO, Impact of AI workload scalability and sovereignty on data centre op- erations, https://futurecio.tech/impact-of-ai-workload-scalability-and-sovereignty-on- data-centre-operations/, online article (Sep 2025)

work page 2025
[9]

Fratini, O

S. Fratini, O. Hine, Digital sovereignty: A descriptive analysis and a critical evaluation of existing models, Digital Society (2024). doi:10.1007/s44206-024-00146-7. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00146-7

work page doi:10.1007/s44206-024-00146-7 2024
[10]

rep., The Green Grid (2007)

The Green Grid, Green grid metrics: Describing data center power eﬃciency, Tech. rep., The Green Grid (2007). URL https://www.thegreengrid.org

work page 2007
[11]

2026 (Jan

MIT Technology Review, Everyone wants AI sovereignty, no one can truly have it, MIT Technology ReviewAccessed: Jan. 2026 (Jan. 2026). URL https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/01/21/1131513/everyone-wants-ai- sovereignty-no-one-can-truly-have-it/

work page 2026
[12]

Esposito, Ai geopolitics and data in the era of technological rivalry, https://www

M. Esposito, Ai geopolitics and data in the era of technological rivalry, https://www. weforum.org/stories/2025/07/ai-geopolitics-data-centres-technological-rivalry/, world Economic Forum online article (jul 2025)

work page 2025
[13]

O’Donnell, C

J. O’Donnell, C. Crownhart, We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard, https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/05/20/1116327/ai- energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech/ (may 2025)

work page 2025
[14]

Korde, T

G. Korde, T. Konar, J. Lamba, Sovereign data center strategy, white paper, Document code: CID215164 (December 2025). URL https://www.nokia.com/asset/i/215164/ April 22, 2026

work page 2025
[15]

T. Xiao, F. You, Environmental impact and net-zero pathways for sustainable artiﬁcial intelligence servers in the USA, Nature Sustainability (2025). doi:10.1038/s41893-025- 01681-y. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-025-01681-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41893-025- 2025
[16]

DataCenters.com, Inside the AI compute stack: Why infrastructure not models is the real bottleneck, https://www.datacenters.com/news/inside-the-ai-compute-stack-why- infrastructure-not-models-is-the-real-bottleneck, online news article (January 2026)

work page 2026
[17]

IBM, Introducing IBM sovereign core: A new software foundation for sovereignty, https://www.ibm.com/new/announcements/introducing-ibm-sovereign-core-a-new- software-foundation-for-sovereignty, product announcement (Jan 2026)

work page 2026
[18]

Cruzes, Telemetry and agentic AI: Foundations for optical network automation, IEEE Access 14 (2026) 8800–8838

S. Cruzes, Telemetry and agentic AI: Foundations for optical network automation, IEEE Access 14 (2026) 8800–8838. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3649768

work page doi:10.1109/access.2025.3649768 2026
[19]

Behringer, M

M. Behringer, M. Pritikin, S. Bjarnason, A. Clemm, B. Carpenter, S. Jiang, Autonomic networking: Deﬁnitions and design goals, RFC 7575 (June 2015). doi:10.17487/RFC7575. URL https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7575

work page doi:10.17487/rfc7575 2015
[20]

Kiasari, H

M. Kiasari, H. Aly, Agentic artiﬁcial intelligence for smart grids: a comprehensive review of autonomous, safe, and explainable control frameworks, Energies 19 (3) (2026)

work page 2026
[21]

URL https://doi.org/10.3390/en19030617

doi:10.3390/en19030617. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/en19030617

work page doi:10.3390/en19030617
[22]

Cruzes, Revolutionizing optical networks: The integration and impact of large language models, Optical Switching and Networking 57 (2025) 100812

S. Cruzes, Revolutionizing optical networks: The integration and impact of large language models, Optical Switching and Networking 57 (2025) 100812. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2025.100812. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573427725000190

work page doi:10.1016/j.osn.2025.100812 2025
[23]

On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models

R. Bommasani, D. A. Hudson, E. Adeli, R. Altman, S. Arora, S. von Arx, M. S. Bern- stein, J. Bohg, A. Bosselut, E. Brunskill, E. Brynjolfsson, S. Buch, D. Card, R. Castel- lon, N. Chatterji, A. Chen, K. Creel, J. Q. Davis, D. Demszky, C. Donahue, M. Doum- bouya, E. Durmus, S. Ermon, J. Etchemendy, K. Ethayarajh, L. Fei-Fei, C. Finn, T. Gale, L. Gillespie,...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[24]

Arora, M

C. Arora, M. Sorel, P. Sachdeva, The next big shifts in AI workloads and hy- perscaler strategies, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and- telecommunications/our-insights/the-next-big-shifts-in-ai-workloads-and-hyperscaler- strategies (dec 2025)

work page 2025
[25]

Choukse, B

E. Choukse, B. Warrier, S. Heath, L. Belmont, A. Zhao, H. A. Khan, B. Harry, M. Kappel, R. J. Hewett, K. Datta, Y. Pei, C. Lichtenberger, J. Siegler, D. Lukof- sky, Z. Kahn, G. Sahota, A. Sullivan, C. Frederick, H. Thai, R. Naughton, D. Ju- rnove, J. Harp, R. Carper, N. Mahalingam, S. Varkala, A. G. Kumbhare, S. Desai, V. Ramamurthy, P. Gottumukkala, G. B...

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

B. Toni, T. Jones, Sovereignty, security, scale: A UK strategy for AI infrastructure, https://institute.global/insights/tech-and-digitalisation/sovereignty-security-scale-a- uk-strategy-for-ai-infrastructure, policy report (Mar 2025)

work page 2025
[27]

Buyya, A

R. Buyya, A. Beloglazov, J. Abawajy, Energy-eﬃcient management of data center re- sources for cloud computing, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 24 (7) (2013) 1396–1407

work page 2013
[28]

contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Tech

IPCC, Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Tech. rep., Cambridge University Press (2021). doi:10.1017/9781009157896

work page doi:10.1017/9781009157896 2021
[29]

L. Cote, A. Sun, Locational marginal emissions for carbon-aware data center operations in large-scale power grids (2025). arXiv:2512.18819. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18819

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

URL https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2025/11/roadmap-shows-environmental- impact-ai-data-center-boom

Cornell Chronicle, Roadmap shows the environmental impact of ai data center boom, accessed: 2026-01-30 (nov 2025). URL https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2025/11/roadmap-shows-environmental- impact-ai-data-center-boom

work page 2026
[31]

Yñez-Barnuevo, Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI), Data centers and water consumption, accessed: 2026-01-30 (jun 2025)

M. Yñez-Barnuevo, Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI), Data centers and water consumption, accessed: 2026-01-30 (jun 2025). URL https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/data-centers-and-water-consumption April 22, 2026

work page 2026
[32]

Singla, B

A. Singla, B. Chandrasekaran, P. B. Godfrey, B. Maggs, The Internet at the speed of light, in: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets- XIII), ACM, Los Angeles, CA, 2014, pp. 1–7. doi:10.1145/2670518.2673876

work page doi:10.1145/2670518.2673876 2014
[33]

Shalf, The future of computing beyond Moore’s law, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 378 (2166) (2020) 20190061

J. Shalf, The future of computing beyond Moore’s law, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 378 (2166) (2020) 20190061. doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0061. URL https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0061

work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0061 2020
[34]

S. B. Chetty, D. Grace, S. Saunders, P. Harris, E. E. Tsiropoulou, T. Quek, H. Ahmadi, Sovereign AI for 6g: Towards the future of AI-native networks (2025). arXiv:2509.06700, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.06700. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06700

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.06700 2025
[35]

J. J. Tithi, H. Wu, A. Abuhatzera, F. Petrini, Scaling intelligence: De- signing data centers for next-gen language models (2025). arXiv:2506.15006, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.15006. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15006

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15006 2025
[36]

R. Gu, Z. Yang, Y. Ji, Machine learning for intelligent optical networks: A compre- hensive survey, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 157 (2020) 102576. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102576

work page doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102576 2020
[37]

URL https://spectrum.ieee.org/rf-over-ﬁber

IEEE Spectrum, RF over ﬁber (2026). URL https://spectrum.ieee.org/rf-over-ﬁber

work page 2026
[38]

scale-out in AI infrastructure (2026)

Naddod, Understanding scale-up vs. scale-out in AI infrastructure (2026). URL https://www.naddod.com/blog/scale-up-vs-scale-out-in-ai-infrastructure

work page 2026
[39]

Point2 Technology, Futuring interconnect infrastructure for AI: RF transmission over plastic cable surpasses copper and optics at terabit scale (2026). URL https://www.signalintegrityjournal.com/articles/4011-futuring-interconnect- infrastructure-for-ai-rf-transmission-over-plastic-cable-surpasses-copper-and-optics- at-terabit-scale

work page 2026
[40]

AddOn Networks, Data sovereignty and ﬁber optics, https://www.addonnetworks.com/ solutions/insights/data-sovereignty-ﬁber-optics-article, accessed 2026 (2024)

work page 2026
[41]

J. Ghez, O. Chatain, AI and sovereignty: The geopolitical power of submarine cables, https://www.hec.edu/en/dare/geopolitics-public-aﬀairs/ai-and-sovereignty- geopolitical-power-submarine-cables, research article (Jan 2024)

work page 2024
[42]

April 22, 2026

IEEE Communications Society, Sovereign ai infrastructure for telecom companies: Implementation and challenges, https://techblog.comsoc.org/2025/12/17/sovereign-ai- infrastructure-for-telecom-companies-implementation-and-challenges/, accessed 2026 (2025). April 22, 2026

work page 2025
[43]

Cruzes, Failure management overview in optical networks, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 169170–169193

S. Cruzes, Failure management overview in optical networks, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 169170–169193. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3498704

work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3498704 2024
[44]

TM Forum, Autonomous networks technical architecture, https://www.tmforum.org/ resources/toolkit/autonomous-networks-technical-architecture/, technical architecture toolkit, IG1230 (Nov 2024)

work page 2024
[45]

A vailable at: https://www.openconﬁg.net (2016)

OpenConﬁg Working Group, OpenConﬁg: Vendor-Neutral, Model-Driven Network Management, open-source data modeling initiative for network device conﬁguration and telemetry. A vailable at: https://www.openconﬁg.net (2016). URL https://www.openconﬁg.net

work page 2016
[46]

Shakir, A

R. Shakir, A. Shaikh, P. Borman, M. Hines, C. Lebsack, C. Morrow, gRPC net- work management interface (gNMI), Internet-Draft draft-openconﬁg-rtgwg-gnmi-spec- 01, IETF (2018). URL https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-openconﬁg-rtgwg-gnmi-spec-01

work page 2018
[47]

R. Enns, M. Björklund, J. Schönwälder, A. Bierman, Network Conﬁguration Protocol (NETCONF), RFC 6241, IETF (Jun. 2011). doi:10.17487/RFC6241. URL https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6241

work page doi:10.17487/rfc6241 2011
[48]

J. Case, M. Fedor, M. Schoﬀstall, J. Davin, Simple network management protocol (snmp), https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1157, [STANDARDS-TRACK] (May 1990)

work page 1990
[49]

Intel Corporation, Hewlett-Packard, NEC, Dell, Intelligent platform management interface speciﬁcation: Second generation, Tech. Rep. v2.0, Document Revision 1.1, Intel Corporation (Oct 2013). URL https://www.intel.com.tw/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/ product-briefs/ipmi-second-gen-interface-spec-v2-rev1-1.pdf

work page 2013
[50]

URL https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/ﬁles/standards/documents/DSP0266_1.21

DMTF, Redﬁsh speciﬁcation, Standard Speciﬁcation DSP0266, Distributed Manage- ment Task Force (2024). URL https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/ﬁles/standards/documents/DSP0266_1.21. 1.html

work page 2024
[51]

rep., American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (2020)

ASHRAE, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 135-2020: A Data Communication Protocol for Building Automation and Control Networks (BACnet), Tech. rep., American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (2020). URL https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/bacnet

work page 2020
[52]

Modbus Organization, Modbus application protocol speciﬁcation, Tech. Rep. V1.1b, Modbus Organization (Dec 2006). URL https://www.modbus.org/ﬁle/secure/modbusprotocolspeciﬁcation.pdf

work page 2006
[53]

April 22, 2026

Green Software Foundation, Carbon-aware SDK, https://github.com/Green-Software- Foundation/carbon-aware-sdk, accessed: 2026-03-29 (2021). April 22, 2026

work page 2026
[54]

Mitrovska, B

A. Mitrovska, B. Shariati, A. Jafari, P. Safari, J. K. Fischer, R. Freund, Network data sharing: A governance framework for ensuring data sovereignty and privacy compli- ance, Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 17 (11) (2025) 1019–1031. doi:10.1364/JOCN.559523

work page doi:10.1364/jocn.559523 2025
[55]

Cloud Security Web, Understanding telemetry for cloud infrastructure optimiza- tion, https://cloudsecurityweb.com/articles/2025/04/13/understanding-telemetry-for- cloud-infrastructure-optimization/, online technical article (Apr 2025)

work page 2025
[56]

T. P. Raptis, A. Passarella, A survey on networked data streaming with apache kafka, IEEE Access 11 (2023) 85333–85350. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3303810

work page doi:10.1109/access.2023.3303810 2023
[57]

OpenTelemetry, Opentelemetry speciﬁcation, https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/ otel/, accessed: 2026-03-29 (2025)

work page 2026
[58]

R. E. Bixby, A brief history of linear and mixed-integer programming computation, in: Documenta Mathematica Extra Volume ISMP (2012), EMS Press, 2012, pp. 107–121. doi:10.4171/DM/2012. URL https://ems.press/content/book-chapter-ﬁles/27357

work page doi:10.4171/dm/2012 2012
[59]

Nalage, Agentic digital twins: Self-evolving models for autonomous systems, Well Testing Journal 34 (S3) (2025) 227–244

P. Nalage, Agentic digital twins: Self-evolving models for autonomous systems, Well Testing Journal 34 (S3) (2025) 227–244. URL https://welltestingjournal.com/index.php/WT/article/view/183

work page 2025
[60]

A. M. Kirubakaran, A. Parthasarathy, N. Saksena, R. S. Bodala, A. Deshpande, S. Malempati, S. K. R. Carimireddy, A. Mazumder, Governing cloud data pipelines with agentic AI, zenodo preprint (2025). doi:10.5281/zenodo.18048728. URL https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.18048728

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18048728 2025
[61]

rep., Photonics21 (2026)

Photonics21, Investing in Light: The vision to secure europe’s competitiveness in the global tech race, Tech. rep., Photonics21 (2026). URL https://www.photonics21.org/download/ppp-services/photonics-downloads/ Photonics21_Position_Paper_Investing_in_Light_The_Vision_to_Secure_ Europes_Competitiveness_in_the_Global_Tech_Race.pdf

work page 2026
[62]

Shekhar, W

S. Shekhar, W. Bogaerts, L. Chrostowski, J. E. Bowers, M. Hochberg, R. Soref, B. J. Shastri, Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics, Nature Communications 15 (1) (2024) 751. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44750-0 2024
[63]

W3C, Trace context, https://www.w3.org/TR/trace-context/, accessed: 2026-03-30 (2023)

work page 2026
[64]

Tandon, A

A. Tandon, A. Dhir, A. N. Islam, M. Mäntymäki, Blockchain in healthcare: A system- atic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda, Computers in Industry 122 (2020) 103290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103290. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361520305248 April 22, 2026

work page doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103290 2020
[65]

Fraga-Lamas, T

P. Fraga-Lamas, T. M. Fernández-Caramés, A review on blockchain technologies for an advanced and cyber-resilient automotive industry, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 17578–17598. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895302

work page doi:10.1109/access.2019.2895302 2019
[66]

Androulaki, A

E. Androulaki, A. Barger, V. Bortnikov, C. Cachin, K. Christidis, A. De Caro, D. Enyeart, C. Ferris, G. Laventman, Y. Manevich, S. Muralidharan, C. Murthy, B. Nguyen, M. Sethi, G. Singh, K. Smith, A. Sorniotti, C. Stathakopoulou, M. Vukoli, S. W. Cocco, J. Yellick, Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permis- sioned blockchains, in: Proc...

work page doi:10.1145/3190508.3190538 2018
[67]

Moreau, P

L. Moreau, P. Missier, K. Belhajjame, R. B’Far, J. Cheney, S. Coppens, S. Cresswell, Y. Gil, P. Groth, G. Klyne, T. Lebo, J. McCusker, D. McGuinness, J. Myers, S. Sahoo, C. Tilmes, PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model, W3c recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), w3C Recommendation 30 April 2013 (Apr. 2013). URL https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/

work page 2013
[68]

T. I. Project, Technical speciﬁcation tr-547 – tapi v2.1.3 reference implementation agree- ment, Tech. rep., Open Networking Foundation (Aug 2020). URL https://opennetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/TR-547-TAPI-v2.1.3- Reference-Implementation-Agreement-1.pdf

work page 2020
[69]

E. B. Sanjuan, I. A. Cardiel, J. A. Cerrada, C. Cerrada, Message queuing telemetry transport (mqtt) security: A cryptographic smart card approach, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 115051–115062. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3003998

work page doi:10.1109/access.2020.3003998 2020
[70]

Radovanovic, R

A. Radovanovic, R. Koningstein, I. Schneider, B. Chen, A. Duarte, B. Roy, D. Xiao, M. Haridasan, P. Hung, N. Care, S. Talukdar, E. Mullen, K. Smith, M. Cottman, W. Cirne, Carbon-aware computing for datacenters, https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11750, arXiv:2106.11750 (2021). arXiv:2106.11750

work page arXiv 2021
[71]

Silva, R

C. Silva, R. Vilaça, A. Pereira, R. Bessa, A review on the decarbonization of high- performance computing centers, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 189 (2024) 114019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114019. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123008778

work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.114019 2024
[72]

A vailable at: https://gnpy

Telecom Infra Project, GNPy: Optical Route Planning and Quality-of-Transmission Estimation, open-source library, Telecom Infra Project. A vailable at: https://gnpy. readthedocs.io (2024). URL https://gnpy.readthedocs.io

work page 2024
[73]

URL https://www.ray.io April 22, 2026

Anyscale, Ray: A Uniﬁed Framework for Scaling AI and Python Applications (2024). URL https://www.ray.io April 22, 2026

work page 2024
[74]

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2025 Best Practice Guidelines for the EU Code of Conduct on Data Centre Energy Eﬃciency, Tech. Rep. JRC141521, Publications Oﬃce of the European Union, version 16.1.0, 1 January 2025 (2025). doi:10.2760/9449356. URL https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC141521

work page doi:10.2760/9449356 2025
[75]

Multiplicative Iteration for Nonnegative Quadratic Programming

K. Mayegun, C. Nwanevu, Harnessing big data and AI to revolutionize sustain- ability accounting and integrated corporate ﬁnancial reporting, International Jour- nal of Computer Applications Technology and Research 14 (6) (2025) 111–128. doi:10.7753/IJCATR1406.1008

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.7753/ijcatr1406.1008 2025
[76]

M. S. Bakare, A. Abdulkarim, A. N. Shuaibu, M. M. Muhamad, Energy management controllers: strategies, coordination, and applications, Energy Informatics 7 (1) (2024)

work page 2024
[77]

April 22, 2026

doi:10.1186/s42162-024-00357-9. April 22, 2026

work page doi:10.1186/s42162-024-00357-9 2026