pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.11093 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method

Jianping Hu , Chao Geng , Xuandong Jia , Zhaoyu Zuo , Taozhi Yang , Fayin Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-th
keywords cosmic anisotropydipole fittinggalaxy clusterscosmological principleX-ray observationsHubble expansionlarge-scale structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Galaxy cluster data shows cosmic expansion anisotropy of magnitude 5.3 times 10 to the minus 4 in two directions at roughly one sigma significance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies an improved dipole fitting technique to a sample of 313 galaxy clusters observed in X-rays to test whether the universe expands at the same rate in all directions. It finds two preferred axes, one aligned with faster expansion and one with slower, each with an anisotropy amplitude around 5.2 to 5.4 times 10 to the minus 4. The overall signal is consistent with no anisotropy at the 1 sigma level, though one instrument subsample reaches nearly 3 sigma. This approach leverages the wide sky coverage of clusters to provide an independent check on the cosmological principle beyond supernovae or cosmic microwave background data.

Core claim

By fitting a dipole model to the directional distribution of galaxy clusters from Chandra and XMM-Newton observations, the analysis identifies preferred directions at galactic coordinates (l, b) approximately (258 degrees, -31 degrees) and (81 degrees, 32 degrees), with an anisotropy magnitude of 5.2 to 5.4 times 10 to the minus 4. Statistical tests including bootstrap and randomization confirm the signal at about 1.0 sigma for the full sample, with higher values in the XMM-Newton subset.

What carries the argument

Dipole fitting method, which models the observed cluster properties as varying with direction according to a dipole term to extract any preferred axis in cosmic expansion.

Load-bearing premise

The differences seen between Chandra and XMM-Newton observations and between redshift ranges do not arise from unaccounted instrumental or selection biases that mimic a dipole signal.

What would settle it

A new analysis of an independent sample of several hundred galaxy clusters using a different X-ray instrument or a different fitting method that finds no preferred direction above 1 sigma would contradict the claim.

read the original abstract

The cosmological principle, as the cornerstone of the standard cosmological model, requires that the Universe be homogeneous and isotropic on large scales. As a fundamental assumption, it is constantly subjected to testing via various datasets and methods. In this work, we applied the dipole fitting (DF) method to galaxy clusters to search for cosmic anisotropic signals and establish a statistical isotropy analysis scheme. Compared to Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), galaxy clusters offer a superior spatial distribution, which enhances the reliability of the identified anisotropic signals. Using a sample of 313 galaxy clusters (observed by Chandra and XMM-Newton), we identified two preferred directions (l, b) = (${257.82^{\circ}}_{-52.88}^{+58.01}$, $-31.30{^{\circ}}_{-39.46}^{+35.92}$) and ($80.89{^{\circ}}_{-52.46}^{+60.97}$, $31.75{^{\circ}}_{-40.16}^{+35.19}$). The former aligns with the direction of faster cosmic expansion, while the latter points toward slower expansion. The corresponding magnitude of anisotropy is $|A| \approx 5.2 \sim 5.4 \times 10^{-4}$, with statistical isotropy analyses yielding a confidence level of $\sim 1.0\sigma$. Subsample reanalyses categorized by instrumentation (Chandra and XMM-Newton) and redshift (low-redshift, $z \leq 0.10$; high-redshift, $z > 0.10$) reveal that the choice of equipment and the sample redshift influence the preferred direction, anisotropic magnitude, and statistical significance. Notably, the XMM-Newton dataset yields a statistical significance of $2.26\sigma$ (Bootstrap) and $2.86\sigma$ (Randomized), which are considerably higher than those from the Chandra or total datasets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies an improved dipole fitting method to a sample of 313 galaxy clusters observed by Chandra and XMM-Newton. It reports two preferred directions (l, b) = (257.82°_{-52.88}^{+58.01}, −31.30°_{-39.46}^{+35.92}) and (80.89°_{-52.46}^{+60.97}, 31.75°_{-40.16}^{+35.19}), with anisotropy amplitude |A| ≈ 5.2–5.4 × 10^{-4} at ~1.0σ significance for the full sample. Subsample analyses by instrument and redshift are presented, showing variations in direction, amplitude, and significance (notably higher values of 2.26–2.86σ for XMM-Newton).

Significance. Galaxy clusters offer a spatially well-distributed probe that could complement SNe Ia for testing the cosmological principle. If the dipole signal can be shown to be robust and independent of instrumental effects, the result would add a low-redshift constraint on anisotropy at the 10^{-4} level. The current marginal significance and subsample dependence, however, limit the immediate implications for cosmology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of a cosmological anisotropy signal at ~1σ rests on the dipole fit to the full sample, yet the abstract explicitly states that the XMM-Newton subsample reaches 2.26σ (Bootstrap) and 2.86σ (Randomized) while the Chandra and total samples remain near 1σ, with differing preferred directions and amplitudes. This indicates that the reported signal strength and direction are sensitive to instrument choice; without an explicit instrument-calibration or selection term in the likelihood, the dipole cannot be cleanly separated from systematics.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The two reported directions have large uncertainties (±52°–60° in longitude), and the statement that one aligns with faster expansion and the other with slower expansion is presented without a quantitative angular separation or consistency test against independent probes (e.g., CMB dipole or SNe Ia directions). This weakens the physical interpretation of the fitted parameters.
minor comments (1)
  1. The error notation using subscripts for asymmetric uncertainties is clear in the abstract but should be defined explicitly in the methods section for readers unfamiliar with the dipole-fitting formalism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, with revisions to improve clarity on subsample dependence and directional interpretation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of a cosmological anisotropy signal at ~1σ rests on the dipole fit to the full sample, yet the abstract explicitly states that the XMM-Newton subsample reaches 2.26σ (Bootstrap) and 2.86σ (Randomized) while the Chandra and total samples remain near 1σ, with differing preferred directions and amplitudes. This indicates that the reported signal strength and direction are sensitive to instrument choice; without an explicit instrument-calibration or selection term in the likelihood, the dipole cannot be cleanly separated from systematics.

    Authors: We agree that subsample variations are evident and already discuss them in the manuscript to highlight potential instrumental influences. The primary result remains the combined sample at ~1σ. We will revise the abstract to more explicitly state the full-sample significance and note the higher XMM-Newton values as possibly indicating systematics or fluctuations. An explicit calibration term cannot be incorporated without additional instrument-specific data beyond the current analysis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The two reported directions have large uncertainties (±52°–60° in longitude), and the statement that one aligns with faster expansion and the other with slower expansion is presented without a quantitative angular separation or consistency test against independent probes (e.g., CMB dipole or SNe Ia directions). This weakens the physical interpretation of the fitted parameters.

    Authors: The reported uncertainties reflect the statistical precision of the 313-cluster sample and are presented transparently. We will add a quantitative angular separation calculation between the two directions (~177°), confirming they are nearly antipodal and consistent with opposing expansion axes. Consistency tests against CMB or SNe Ia directions involve differing redshifts and methodologies and are noted as a limitation for future work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct dipole fits to data

full rationale

The paper applies a standard dipole fitting procedure to a catalog of 313 galaxy clusters to extract preferred directions and anisotropy amplitude |A|. These quantities are the direct numerical outputs of the fit (as described in the abstract and implied by the method), not quantities derived from an independent first-principles relation, self-referential definition, or prior self-citation that is then re-labeled as a prediction. Subsample splits by instrument and redshift are presented as consistency checks rather than load-bearing inputs that force the main result. No equations or citations in the provided text reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The reported anisotropy rests on two fitted parameters (amplitude and direction) plus the assumption that the dipole model captures any true cosmic signal without dominant instrumental bias.

free parameters (2)
  • Anisotropy amplitude |A| = 5.3 x 10^{-4}
    Fitted directly to the 313-cluster sample to quantify the dipole strength.
  • Preferred direction (l, b) = 257.82°, -31.30° and 80.89°, 31.75°
    Fitted galactic coordinates for the two reported axes.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The dipole model accurately represents any large-scale anisotropy present in the cluster data
    Invoked when interpreting the fitted parameters as cosmic rather than observational.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5660 in / 1476 out tokens · 52073 ms · 2026-05-16T02:18:18.400537+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing cosmic anisotropy with galaxy clusters and supernovae

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Analysis of galaxy cluster and supernova data reveals a ~2σ directional variation in the Hubble constant, robust across calibration methods and aligned with the CMB dipole.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

192 extracted references · 192 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 82 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed Type Ia Supernovae from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from The Combined Pantheon Sample

    D.M. Scolnic, D.O. Jones, A. Rest, Y.C. Pan, R. Chornock, R.J. Foley et al., The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample , ApJ 859 (2018) 101 [1710.00845]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey

    T.M.C. Abbott, A. Alarcon, S. Allam, P. Andersen, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Annis et al., Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 171301 [ 1811.02375]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Khadka and B

    N. Khadka and B. Ratra, Quasar X-ray and UV flux, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter measurement constraints on cosmological model parameters, MNRAS 492 (2020) 4456 [1909.01400]

    work page arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Brout, D. Scolnic, B. Popovic, A.G. Riess, A. Carr, J. Zuntz et al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints , ApJ 938 (2022) 110 [ 2202.04077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Cao and B

    S. Cao and B. Ratra, Using lower redshift, non-CMB, data to constrain the Hubble constant and other cosmological parameters, MNRAS 513 (2022) 5686 [ 2203.10825]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Dainotti, V

    M.G. Dainotti, V. Nielson, G. Sarracino, E. Rinaldi, S. Nagataki, S. Capozziello et al., Optical and X-ray GRB Fundamental Planes as cosmological distance indicators , MNRAS 514 (2022) 1828 [2203.15538]. – 18 – /uni0000001b/uni00000013 /uni00000017/uni00000013 /uni00000013 /uni00000017/uni00000013 /uni0000001b/uni00000013 /uni00000045 /uni00000013/uni0000...

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Jia, J.P

    X.D. Jia, J.P. Hu, J. Yang, B.B. Zhang and F.Y. Wang, E iso-Ep correlation of gamma-ray bursts: calibration and cosmological applications , MNRAS 516 (2022) 2575 [ 2208.09272]. – 19 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Y. Liu, F. Chen, N. Liang, Z. Yuan, H. Yu and P. Wu, The Improved Amati Correlations from Gaussian Copula, ApJ 931 (2022) 50 [ 2203.03178]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Liang, Z

    N. Liang, Z. Li, X. Xie and P. Wu, Calibrating Gamma-Ray Bursts by Using a Gaussian Process with Type Ia Supernovae, ApJ 941 (2022) 84 [ 2211.02473]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Porredon, M

    A. Porredon, M. Crocce, J. Elvin-Poole, R. Cawthon, G. Giannini, J. De Vicente et al., Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MAGLIM lens sample , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 103530 [2105.13546]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Wang, J.P

    F.Y. Wang, J.P. Hu, G.Q. Zhang and Z.G. Dai, Standardized Long Gamma-Ray Bursts as a Cosmic Distance Indicator, ApJ 924 (2022) 97 [ 2106.14155]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    de Cruz P´ erez, C.-G

    J. de Cruz P´ erez, C.-G. Park and B. Ratra, Current data are consistent with flat spatial hypersurfaces in the Λ CDM cosmological model but favor more lensing than the model predicts, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 063522 [ 2211.04268]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Khadka, M

    N. Khadka, M. Zajaˇ cek, R. Prince, S. Panda, B. Czerny, M.L. Mart´ ınez-Aldama et al., Quasar UV/X-ray relation luminosity distances are shorter than reverberation-measured radius-luminosity relation luminosity distances , MNRAS 522 (2023) 1247 [ 2212.10483]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Z. Li, B. Zhang and N. Liang, Testing dark energy models with gamma-ray bursts calibrated from the observational H(z) data through a Gaussian process , MNRAS 521 (2023) 4406 [2212.14291]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework

    D. Rubin, G. Aldering, M. Betoule, A. Fruchter, X. Huang, A.G. Kim et al., Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework , arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2311.12098 [ 2311.12098]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander, M. Alvarez et al., DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations , J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025 (2025) 021 [ 2404.03002]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe

    L. Verde, T. Treu and A.G. Riess, Tensions between the early and late Universe , Nature Astronomy 3 (2019) 891 [ 1907.10625]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Riess, The expansion of the Universe is faster than expected , Nature Reviews Physics 2 (2020) 10 [ 2001.03624]

    A.G. Riess, The expansion of the Universe is faster than expected , Nature Reviews Physics 2 (2020) 10 [ 2001.03624]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri et al., In the realm of the Hubble tension-a review of solutions , Classical and Quantum Gravity 38 (2021) 153001 [2103.01183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    P. Shah, P. Lemos and O. Lahav, A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant , A&A Revie 29 (2021) 9 [ 2109.01161]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, Challenges for ΛCDM: An update, New Astron. Rev. 95 (2022) 101659 [ 2105.05208]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Hu and F.-Y

    J.-P. Hu and F.-Y. Wang, Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics , Universe 9 (2023) 94 [2302.05709]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Kumar Aluri, P

    P. Kumar Aluri, P. Cea, P. Chingangbam, M.-C. Chu, R.G. Clowes, D. Hutsem´ ekers et al., Is the observable Universe consistent with the cosmological principle? , Classical and Quantum Gravity 40 (2023) 094001

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Vagnozzi, Universe9, 393 (2023), arXiv:2308.16628 [astro-ph.CO]

    S. Vagnozzi, Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension, Universe 9 (2023) 393 [ 2308.16628]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Riess and L

    A.G. Riess and L. Breuval, The Local Value of H 0, in IAU Symposium, R. de Grijs, P.A. Whitelock and M. Catelan, eds., vol. 376 of IAU Symposium, pp. 15–29, Jan., 2024, DOI [2308.10954]. – 20 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Di Valentinoet al., Astropart

    E. Di Valentino, L.A. Anchordoqui, ¨O. Akarsu, Y. Ali-Haimoud, L. Amendola, N. Arendse et al., Cosmology Intertwined III: f σ8 and S8, Astroparticle Physics 131 (2021) 102604 [2008.11285]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Nunes and S

    R.C. Nunes and S. Vagnozzi, Arbitrating the S 8 discrepancy with growth rate measurements from redshift-space distortions, MNRAS 505 (2021) 5427 [ 2106.01208]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Adil, ¨O

    S.A. Adil, ¨O. Akarsu, M. Malekjani, E. ´O Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi, A.A. Sen et al.,S 8 increases with effective redshift in ΛCDM cosmology, MNRAS 528 (2024) L20 [ 2303.06928]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Hollis, Hints of a physical origin for the S 8 tension, Nature Astronomy 8 (2024) 405

    M. Hollis, Hints of a physical origin for the S 8 tension, Nature Astronomy 8 (2024) 405

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Stahl, B

    C. Stahl, B. Famaey, R. Ibata, O. Hahn, N. Martinet and T. Montandon, Scale-dependent local primordial non-Gaussianity as a solution to the S8 tension , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 063501 [2404.03244]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Examining the evidence for dynamical dark energy

    G.-B. Zhao, R.G. Crittenden, L. Pogosian and X. Zhang, Examining the Evidence for Dynamical Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 171301 [ 1207.3804]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    G.-B. Zhao, M. Raveri, L. Pogosian, Y. Wang, R.G. Crittenden, W.J. Handley et al., Dynamical dark energy in light of the latest observations , Nature Astronomy 1 (2017) 627 [1701.08165]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Tutusaus, M

    I. Tutusaus, M. Kunz and L. Favre, Solving the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts with dynamical dark energy, arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2311.16862 [ 2311.16862]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,DESI and SNe: Dynamical Dark Energy, Ωm Tension or Systematics?, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2412.12905 [ 2412.12905]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Jiang, D

    J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S.S. da Costa and S. Vagnozzi, Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 123519 [ 2408.02365]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Van Raamsdonk and C

    M. Van Raamsdonk and C. Waddell, Suggestions of decreasing dark energy from supernova and BAO data , J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2024 (2024) 047 [ 2305.04946]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Lopez-Hernandez and J

    M. Lopez-Hernandez and J. De-Santiago, Is there a dynamical tendency in H 0 with late time measurements?, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2025 (2025) 026 [ 2411.00095]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Ormondroyd, W.J

    A.N. Ormondroyd, W.J. Handley, M.P. Hobson and A.N. Lasenby, Nonparametric reconstructions of dynamical dark energy via flexknots , arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2503.08658 [2503.08658]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Wang, Y.-J

    Y.-Y. Wang, Y.-J. Li and Y.-Z. Fan, Evidence for the dynamical dark energy with evolving Hubble constant, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2510.14390 [ 2510.14390]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Scherer, M

    M. Scherer, M.A. Sabogal, R.C. Nunes and A. De Felice, Challenging ΛCDM: 5σ Evidence for a Dynamical Dark Energy Late-Time Transition , arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2504.20664 [2504.20664]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Wong, S.H

    K.C. Wong, S.H. Suyu, G.C.F. Chen, C.E. Rusu, M. Millon, D. Sluse et al., H0LiCOW - XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H 0 from lensed quasars: 5.3 σ tension between early- and late-Universe probes, MNRAS 498 (2020) 1420 [ 1907.04869]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Krishnan, E

    C. Krishnan, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Ruchika, A. A., M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang,Is there an early Universe solution to Hubble tension? , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 103525 [ 2002.06044]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Dainotti, B

    M.G. Dainotti, B. De Simone, T. Schiavone, G. Montani, E. Rinaldi and G. Lambiase, On the Hubble Constant Tension in the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample , ApJ 912 (2021) 150 [ 2103.02117]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Hu and F.Y

    J.P. Hu and F.Y. Wang, Revealing the late-time transition of H 0: relieve the Hubble crisis , MNRAS 517 (2022) 576 [ 2203.13037]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Jia, J.P

    X.D. Jia, J.P. Hu and F.Y. Wang, Evidence of a decreasing trend for the Hubble constant , A&A 674 (2023) A45 [ 2212.00238]. – 21 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    si84.svg

    E. ´O Colg´ ain, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Solomon, M.G. Dainotti and D. Stojkovic, Putting flat ¡mml:math altimg=“si84.svg” display=“inline” id=“d1e4172”¿¡mml:mi¿Λ¡/mml:mi¿¡/mml:math¿CDM in the (Redshift) bin , Physics of the Dark Universe 44 (2024) 101464 [ 2206.11447]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Jia, J.P

    X.D. Jia, J.P. Hu, S.X. Yi and F.Y. Wang, Uncorrelated Estimations of H 0 Redshift Evolution from DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Observations , ApJ lett. 979 (2025) L34 [2406.02019]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    Conjoined constraints on modified gravity from the expansion history and cosmic growth

    S. Basilakos and S. Nesseris, Conjoined constraints on modified gravity from the expansion history and cosmic growth , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 063517 [ 1705.08797]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [50]

    Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

    T.M.C. Abbott, F.B. Abdalla, A. Alarcon, J. Aleksi´ c, S. Allam, S. Allen et al., Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 043526 [ 1708.01530]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [51]

    KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering

    S. Joudaki, C. Blake, A. Johnson, A. Amon, M. Asgari, A. Choi et al., KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering, MNRAS 474 (2018) 4894 [ 1707.06627]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [52]

    Planck and the local Universe: quantifying the tension

    L. Verde, P. Protopapas and R. Jimenez, Planck and the local Universe: Quantifying the tension, Physics of the Dark Universe 2 (2013) 166 [ 1306.6766]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [53]

    The local and distant Universe: stellar ages and $H_0$

    R. Jimenez, A. Cimatti, L. Verde, M. Moresco and B. Wandelt, The local and distant Universe: stellar ages and H 0, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2019 (2019) 043 [ 1902.07081]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [54]

    Vagnozzi, F

    S. Vagnozzi, F. Pacucci and A. Loeb, Implications for the Hubble tension from the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 36 (2022) 27 [ 2105.10421]

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [55]

    Isolating the Lyman Alpha Forest BAO Anomaly

    J. Evslin, Isolating the Lyman alpha forest BAO anomaly , J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2017 (2017) 024 [ 1604.02809]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [56]

    Elucidating $\Lambda$CDM: Impact of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements on the Hubble Constant Discrepancy

    G.E. Addison, D.J. Watts, C.L. Bennett, M. Halpern, G. Hinshaw and J.L. Weiland, Elucidating ΛCDM: Impact of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements on the Hubble Constant Discrepancy, ApJ 853 (2018) 119 [ 1707.06547]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [57]

    Cuceu, J

    A. Cuceu, J. Farr, P. Lemos and A. Font-Ribera, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Hubble constant: past, present and future , J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2019 (2019) 044 [1906.11628]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [58]

    Bullock and M

    J.S. Bullock and M. Boylan-Kolchin, Small-Scale Challenges to the ΛCDM Paradigm, ARA&A 55 (2017) 343 [ 1707.04256]

    work page arXiv 2017

  58. [59]

    The distribution of dark matter in galaxies

    P. Salucci, The distribution of dark matter in galaxies , A&A Revie 27 (2019) 2 [ 1811.08843]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [60]

    First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Preliminary Maps and Basic Results

    C.L. Bennett, M. Halpern, G. Hinshaw, N. Jarosik, A. Kogut, M. Limon et al., First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Preliminary Maps and Basic Results, ApJS 148 (2003) 1 [ astro-ph/0302207]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  60. [61]

    Mapping extreme-scale alignments of quasar polarization vectors

    D. Hutsem´ ekers, R. Cabanac, H. Lamy and D. Sluse, Mapping extreme-scale alignments of quasar polarization vectors, A&A 441 (2005) 915 [ astro-ph/0507274]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [62]

    Dipole of the luminosity distance: a direct measure of H(z)

    C. Bonvin, R. Durrer and M. Kunz, Dipole of the Luminosity Distance: A Direct Measure of H(z), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 191302 [ astro-ph/0603240]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [63]

    Anisotropic Dark Energy: Dynamics of Background and Perturbations

    T. Koivisto and D.F. Mota, Anisotropic dark energy: dynamics of the background and perturbations, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2008 (2008) 018 [ 0801.3676]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  63. [64]

    Probing the anisotropic local universe and beyond with SNe Ia data

    J. Colin, R. Mohayaee, S. Sarkar and A. Shafieloo, Probing the anisotropic local Universe and beyond with SNe Ia data , MNRAS 414 (2011) 264 [ 1011.6292]. – 22 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [65]

    Indications of a spatial variation of the fine structure constant

    J.K. Webb, J.A. King, M.T. Murphy, V.V. Flambaum, R.F. Carswell and M.B. Bainbridge, Indications of a Spatial Variation of the Fine Structure Constant , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 191101 [1008.3907]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [66]

    Impact of local structure on the cosmic radio dipole

    M. Rubart, D. Bacon and D.J. Schwarz, Impact of local structure on the cosmic radio dipole , A&A 565 (2014) A111 [ 1402.0376]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [67]

    Akarsu, J.D

    ¨O. Akarsu, J.D. Barrow and N.M. Uzun, Screening anisotropy via energy-momentum squared gravity: Λ CDM model with hidden anisotropy , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 124059 [2009.06517]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [68]

    Krishnan, R

    C. Krishnan, R. Mondol and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Dipole cosmology: the Copernican paradigm beyond FLRW, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2023 (2023) 020 [ 2209.14918]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [69]

    Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    E. Abdalla, G.F. Abell´ an, A. Aboubrahim, A. Agnello, ¨O. Akarsu, Y. Akrami et al., Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies , Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 34 (2022) 49 [ 2203.06142]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  69. [70]

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    E. Di Valentino, J. Levi Said, A. Riess, A. Pollo, V. Poulin, A. G´ omez-Valent et al., The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics , arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2504.01669 [ 2504.01669]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    Migkas, G

    K. Migkas, G. Schellenberger, T.H. Reiprich, F. Pacaud, M.E. Ramos-Ceja and L. Lovisari, Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the L X-T scaling relation, A&A 636 (2020) A15 [ 2004.03305]

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [72]

    A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP

    M. Tegmark, A. de Oliveira-Costa and A.J. Hamilton, High resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP , Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 123523 [ astro-ph/0302496]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  72. [73]

    Low-order multipole maps of CMB anisotropy derived from WMAP

    P. Bielewicz, K.M. G´ orski and A.J. Banday,Low-order multipole maps of cosmic microwave background anisotropy derived from WMAP , MNRAS 355 (2004) 1283 [ astro-ph/0405007]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  73. [74]

    Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Are There Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies?

    C.L. Bennett, R.S. Hill, G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, K.M. Smith, J. Dunkley et al., Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Are There Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies?, ApJS 192 (2011) 17 [ 1001.4758]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  74. [75]

    New constraints on Parity Symmetry from a re-analysis of the WMAP-7 low resolution power spectra

    A. Gruppuso, F. Finelli, P. Natoli, F. Paci, P. Cabella, A. de Rosa et al., New constraints on parity symmetry from a re-analysis of the WMAP-7 low-resolution power spectra , MNRAS 411 (2011) 1445 [ 1006.1979]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [76]

    Ghosh and P

    S. Ghosh and P. Jain, A pixel space method for testing dipole modulation in the CMB polarization, MNRAS 492 (2020) 3994 [ 1807.02359]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [77]

    Akrami, M

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al., Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB , A&A 641 (2020) A7 [1906.02552]

    work page arXiv 2018

  77. [78]

    Spatial variation in the fine-structure constant -- new results from VLT/UVES

    J.A. King, J.K. Webb, M.T. Murphy, V.V. Flambaum, R.F. Carswell, M.B. Bainbridge et al., Spatial variation in the fine-structure constant - new results from VLT/UVES , MNRAS 422 (2012) 3370 [ 1202.4758]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  78. [79]

    Li and H.-N

    X. Li and H.-N. Lin, Spatial and temporal variations of the fine-structure constant in the Finslerian universe, Chinese Physics C 41 (2017) 065102

    work page 2017

  79. [80]

    Milakovi´ c, C.C

    D. Milakovi´ c, C.C. Lee, P. Molaro and J.K. Webb,Methods for quasar absorption system measurements of the fine structure constant in the 2020s and beyond , in Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, vol. 94, p. 270, Sept., 2023, DOI [ 2212.02458]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [81]

    Koksbang, Searching for Signals of Inhomogeneity Using Multiple Probes of the Cosmic Expansion Rate H (z ) , Phys

    S.M. Koksbang, Searching for Signals of Inhomogeneity Using Multiple Probes of the Cosmic Expansion Rate H (z ) , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 231101 [ 2105.11880]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.