pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.19812 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-23 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

dS⁴ Metamorphosis

Dionysios Anninos , Chiara Baracco , Vasileios A. Letsios , Beatrix M\"uhlmann
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords higher spin gravityde Sitter spacepath integral gluingS^4 partition functionSp(N) theoryHartle-Hawking wavefunctionconformal higher spin sources
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Euclidean path integral on S^4 in higher spin gravity glues across an S^3 hypersurface to a boundary Sp(N) or N=2 superconformal theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a gluing formula that expresses the path integral of higher spin gravity on the four-sphere in terms of a path integral on a three-sphere that splits it into two halves. This formula is derived from a one-loop analysis and identifies the boundary theory living on the cut as the Sp(N) invariant sector of N anti-commuting conformally coupled free scalars with higher spin sources, or alternatively an N=2 superconformal theory with U(N) sources. If correct, this provides a concrete way to evaluate the four-sphere partition function, which receives a leading contribution of 2^N together with exact cancellations at one loop. The construction connects the finite-volume S^4 geometry to the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction studied in the higher spin dS4/CFT3 correspondence. A sympathetic reader would care because the result reduces a gravitational observable on a compact space to a boundary field theory calculation.

Core claim

Based on a one-loop analysis, the S^4 path integral in higher spin gravity is expressed through a gluing formula in terms of an underlying S^3 path integral. For a higher spin spectrum containing even spins only, the resulting boundary theory on the S^3 cut is the Sp(N) invariant sector of N positive integer anti-commuting conformally coupled free scalars, with conformal higher spin sources mediating the gluing. For theories with both bosonic and fermionic higher spin fields, the gluing formula is instead built from an N=2 superconformal boundary field theory coupled to U(N) invariant superconformal sources. Under this assumption the leading contribution to the four-sphere partition function

What carries the argument

The gluing formula across the equatorial S^3 hypersurface, mediated by conformal higher spin sources in an Sp(N) or N=2 superconformal boundary theory.

If this is right

  • The leading term in the four-sphere partition function is exactly 2^N.
  • Exact cancellations occur at one-loop order for both the even-spin and mixed bosonic-fermionic cases.
  • The boundary Sp(N) theory on the finite S^3 computes the same Hartle-Hawking wavefunction previously obtained at infinite future infinity.
  • The gluing construction applies uniformly to spectra with only even spins and to spectra containing both bosons and fermions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same gluing procedure could be applied to other compact four-manifolds, yielding partition functions in terms of lower-dimensional boundary theories.
  • Numerical evaluation of the boundary Sp(N) or superconformal theory for small integer N would provide an independent check of the predicted 2^N leading term.
  • The reduction from bulk gravity on S^4 to a boundary CFT on S^3 suggests that spacetime degrees of freedom in higher spin theories can be reconstructed from finite-volume boundary data.

Load-bearing premise

The one-loop analysis suffices to fix the exact form of the gluing formula and to identify the boundary theory for the full path integral.

What would settle it

A two-loop or higher computation of the S^4 partition function for a specific even-spin higher spin theory that yields a result other than 2^N or that lacks the predicted one-loop cancellations would falsify the gluing formula.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.19812 by Beatrix M\"uhlmann, Chiara Baracco, Dionysios Anninos, Vasileios A. Letsios.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Interplay between the Euclidean S 4 partition function and the Lorentzian Hartle-Hawking wavefunction of a Λ > 0 higher spin theory. The one-loop analysis moti￾vates the gluing formula (3.10), which suggests that the S 4 partition function is obtained by gluing two hemispheres with a common three-sphere boundary. On the boundary we place the Sp(N) invariant sector of a Sp(N) vector model, coupled to confor… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The sphere partition function of four-dimensional higher spin theory with Λ > 0 can be obtained by gluing together two hemispheres with an S 3 boundary. The underlying theory living on the S 3 boundary is built from the Sp(N) invariant sector of the N anti-commuting, conformally coupled real scalars χ I , with I = 1, . . . , N. The glue, indicated by the blue lines, are conformal higher spin gauge fields. … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the Euclidean path integral of higher spin gravity on $S^4$. Based on a one-loop analysis, we are led to a gluing formula expressing the $S^4$ path integral in terms of an underlying $S^3$ path integral. We view the three-sphere as a boundary hypersurface splitting the four-sphere into two halves. For a higher spin spectrum containing even spins only, the resulting boundary theory living on the $S^3$ cut is the $\mathrm{Sp}(N)$ invariant sector of $N\in \mathbb{Z}^+$ anti-commuting, conformally coupled free scalars, with conformal higher spin sources mediating the gluing. This boundary $\mathrm{Sp}(N)$ theory was previously shown to compute the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction at $\mathcal{I}^+$ in the higher spin dS$_4$/CFT$_3$ correspondence. In contrast to the infinite spatial volume of $\mathcal{I}^+$, here the conformal fields populate a finite size $S^3$ hypersurface of $S^4$. For theories with both bosonic and fermionic higher spin fields, the gluing formula is instead built from an $\mathcal{N}=2$ superconformal boundary field theory coupled to $U(N)$ invariant superconformal sources. Under this assumption, the leading contribution to the four-sphere partition function is $2^N$, and we observe exact cancellations at one-loop.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a one-loop analysis of the Euclidean path integral for higher spin gravity on S^4 yields a gluing formula relating the S^4 partition function to an underlying S^3 path integral across a hypersurface cut. For even-spin spectra only, the boundary theory on S^3 is identified as the Sp(N) invariant sector of N anti-commuting conformally coupled free scalars with conformal higher spin sources; this is linked to prior dS4/CFT3 results for the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction. For spectra containing both bosonic and fermionic higher spins, the gluing is instead assumed to arise from an N=2 superconformal boundary theory coupled to U(N) invariant sources. Under these assumptions the leading contribution to the S^4 partition function is 2^N with exact cancellations at one loop.

Significance. If the one-loop gluing formula captures the full non-perturbative path integral, the result would furnish an explicit, finite-volume computation of the S^4 partition function in higher spin gravity, directly connecting it to known boundary CFT partition functions on S^3 and extending the dS4/CFT3 correspondence to a compact hypersurface rather than the infinite I^+. The emergence of a simple 2^N leading term together with exact one-loop cancellations would be noteworthy, as would the reuse of the Sp(N) theory previously shown to compute the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction.

major comments (2)
  1. [One-loop analysis leading to gluing formula] The gluing formula and the claim that the leading S^4 contribution is exactly 2^N rest entirely on a one-loop analysis whose explicit details and higher-order checks are not provided. The manuscript does not demonstrate that higher-loop or non-perturbative corrections preserve the leading term or the reported cancellations, which is load-bearing for the central assertion that the one-loop result determines the full partition function.
  2. [Assumption for mixed bosonic-fermionic spectrum] For the mixed bosonic-fermionic spectrum the gluing formula is built on the assumption that it arises from an N=2 superconformal boundary theory coupled to U(N) invariant sources. No explicit verification is given that the one-loop gluing persists beyond perturbation theory in this case, undermining the 2^N claim for the general spectrum.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'exact cancellations at one-loop' are observed but does not identify which quantities cancel; a short clarification in the main text would improve readability.
  2. [Boundary theory identification] Notation for the conformal higher spin sources and the precise definition of the Sp(N) invariant sector should be stated explicitly when first introduced, rather than relying solely on references to prior dS4/CFT3 literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. Our analysis is explicitly based on a one-loop computation of the Euclidean path integral, as stated in the manuscript, and we do not claim non-perturbative control. We respond point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [One-loop analysis leading to gluing formula] The gluing formula and the claim that the leading S^4 contribution is exactly 2^N rest entirely on a one-loop analysis whose explicit details and higher-order checks are not provided. The manuscript does not demonstrate that higher-loop or non-perturbative corrections preserve the leading term or the reported cancellations, which is load-bearing for the central assertion that the one-loop result determines the full partition function.

    Authors: We agree that the gluing formula and the reported 2^N leading term with one-loop cancellations are obtained from a one-loop analysis; the manuscript does not contain higher-loop or non-perturbative computations. The paper presents these results as the outcome of the one-loop path integral on S^4, with the boundary S^3 theory supplying the leading contribution, and does not assert that this determines the full non-perturbative partition function. We will revise the text to state more explicitly that higher-order corrections lie outside the present scope and that the cancellations are observed at one loop. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Assumption for mixed bosonic-fermionic spectrum] For the mixed bosonic-fermionic spectrum the gluing formula is built on the assumption that it arises from an N=2 superconformal boundary theory coupled to U(N) invariant sources. No explicit verification is given that the one-loop gluing persists beyond perturbation theory in this case, undermining the 2^N claim for the general spectrum.

    Authors: The manuscript states that the gluing formula for the mixed spectrum is constructed under the assumption of an N=2 superconformal boundary theory with U(N) sources; this assumption is made on the basis of spectrum matching and one-loop consistency with the bosonic case. No explicit verification beyond one loop is provided, consistent with the overall perturbative nature of the calculation. The 2^N term follows from the same boundary-theory counting once the assumption is adopted. We will add a clarifying remark that the persistence of the gluing beyond one loop for the mixed spectrum is not demonstrated. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

One-loop gluing formula independent but boundary theory identification reuses prior dS4/CFT3 self-citation for 2^N claim

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "This boundary Sp(N) theory was previously shown to compute the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction at I⁺ in the higher spin dS₄/CFT₃ correspondence."

    The leading contribution 2^N and exact one-loop cancellations are obtained only after identifying the boundary theory with the Sp(N) sector; this identification is justified solely by the cited prior result rather than re-derived from the present one-loop gluing equations, making the exact partition function claim load-bearing on overlapping-author prior work.

full rationale

The paper derives the gluing formula expressing the S^4 path integral via an S^3 integral from a one-loop analysis on S^4, which does not reduce to fitted inputs or prior equations by construction. The specific mapping to the Sp(N) boundary theory (yielding leading 2^N and cancellations) explicitly invokes a previous result that this theory computes the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction. This is a moderate self-citation load-bearing step for the exact non-perturbative interpretation, but the core gluing derivation remains self-contained against external one-loop benchmarks and does not collapse the full claim to a renaming or definition. No self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or ansatz-smuggling patterns appear in the provided derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard path-integral formalism of quantum field theory, the validity of the one-loop approximation for higher spin fields, and the assumption that the spectrum dictates the precise boundary theory (Sp(N) or N=2 superconformal). No new free parameters are introduced; the 2^N factor emerges from the gluing construction.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption One-loop approximation suffices to determine the leading gluing structure and exact cancellations
    Invoked in the opening sentence of the abstract to derive the gluing formula
  • domain assumption Higher spin spectrum (even spins only or bosonic+fermionic) determines the boundary theory as Sp(N) scalars or N=2 superconformal fields
    Stated explicitly when describing the resulting boundary theory

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1590 out tokens · 53482 ms · 2026-05-15T20:22:12.012127+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The yes boundaries wavefunctions of the universe

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Using two timelike boundaries and a nearly maximally entangled thermofield double state from dressed de Sitter Hamiltonian theories, the authors construct wavefunctions for extended cosmological spacetimes that includ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602, [hep-th/0603001]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09 (2020) 002, [arXiv:1905.0825]

    G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09 (2020) 002, [arXiv:1905.0825]

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104, [hep-th/9601029]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  6. [6]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,arXiv:1903.1111

    work page arXiv 1903

  7. [7]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752–2756

    work page 1977

  8. [8]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2738–2751. 34

    work page 1977

  9. [9]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, Y. T. A. Law, and Z. Sun,Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions,JHEP01(2022) 088, [arXiv:2009.1246]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    M¨ uhlmann,The two-sphere partition function from timelike Liouville theory at three-loop order,JHEP05(2022) 057, [arXiv:2202.0454]

    B. M¨ uhlmann,The two-sphere partition function from timelike Liouville theory at three-loop order,JHEP05(2022) 057, [arXiv:2202.0454]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking,Wave Function of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960–2975

    work page 1983

  12. [12]

    Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman, and A. Strominger,Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017), no. 1 015009, [arXiv:1108.5735]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, R. Monten, and Z. Sun,Higher Spin de Sitter Hilbert Space,JHEP 10(2019) 071, [arXiv:1711.1003]. [Erratum: JHEP 06, 085 (2024)]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Silverstein and G

    E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,Timelike-bounded dS 4 holography from a solvable sector of the T2 deformation,JHEP03(2025) 156, [arXiv:2409.0870]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    M. A. Vasiliev,Consistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions,Phys. Lett. B243(1990) 378–382

    work page 1990

  16. [16]

    Higuchi,Quantum linearization instabilities of de Sitter space-time

    A. Higuchi,Quantum linearization instabilities of de Sitter space-time. 1,Class. Quant. Grav.8(1991) 1961–1981

    work page 1991

  17. [17]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model,Phys. Lett. B550(2002) 213–219, [hep-th/0210114]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    One Loop Tests of Higher Spin AdS/CFT

    S. Giombi and I. R. Klebanov,One Loop Tests of Higher Spin AdS/CFT,JHEP12(2013) 068, [arXiv:1308.2337]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    Supersymmetric Higher Spin Theories

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell,Supersymmetric Higher Spin Theories,J. Phys. A46(2013) 214022, [arXiv:1208.6019]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    ABJ Triality: from Higher Spin Fields to Strings

    C.-M. Chang, S. Minwalla, T. Sharma, and X. Yin,ABJ Triality: from Higher Spin Fields to Strings,J. Phys. A46(2013) 214009, [arXiv:1207.4485]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Hertog, G

    T. Hertog, G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, T. Van Riet, and V. Venken,Supersymmetric dS/CFT,JHEP02(2018) 024, [arXiv:1709.0602]

    work page arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Fronsdal,Massless Fields with Integer Spin,Phys

    C. Fronsdal,Massless Fields with Integer Spin,Phys. Rev. D18(1978) 3624

    work page 1978

  23. [23]

    M. A. Vasiliev,Nonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fields in (A)dS(d), Phys. Lett. B567(2003) 139–151, [hep-th/0304049]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  24. [24]

    Real Forms of Complex Higher Spin Field Equations and New Exact Solutions

    C. Iazeolla, E. Sezgin, and P. Sundell,Real forms of complex higher spin field equations and new exact solutions,Nucl. Phys. B791(2008) 231–264, [arXiv:0706.2983]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    Fang and C

    J. Fang and C. Fronsdal,Massless Fields with Half Integral Spin,Phys. Rev. D18(1978) 3630

    work page 1978

  26. [26]

    Fang and C

    J. Fang and C. Fronsdal,Massless, Half Integer Spin Fields in De Sitter Space,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 1361

    work page 1980

  27. [27]

    Fierz and W

    M. Fierz and W. Pauli,On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A173(1939) 211–232

    work page 1939

  28. [28]

    Rarita and J

    W. Rarita and J. Schwinger,On a theory of particles with half integral spin,Phys. Rev.60 (1941) 61

    work page 1941

  29. [29]

    V. A. Letsios,(Non-)unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space 35 II: an explanation based on the group-theoretic properties of the spin-3/2 and spin-5/2 eigenmodes,J. Phys. A57(2024), no. 13 135401, [arXiv:2206.0985]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Arbitrary Spin Representations in de Sitter from dS/CFT with Applications to dS Supergravity

    S. Deser and A. Waldron,Arbitrary spin representations in de Sitter from dS / CFT with applications to dS supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B662(2003) 379–392, [hep-th/0301068]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    V. A. Letsios,New conformal-like symmetry of strictly massless fermions in four-dimensional de Sitter space,JHEP05(2024) 078, [arXiv:2310.0170]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Higuchi,Linearized gravity in de Sitter space-time as a representation of SO(4,1),Class

    A. Higuchi,Linearized gravity in de Sitter space-time as a representation of SO(4,1),Class. Quant. Grav.8(1991) 2005–2021

    work page 1991

  33. [33]

    Rios Fukelman, M

    A. Rios Fukelman, M. Semp´ e, and G. A. Silva,Notes on gauge fields and discrete series representations in de Sitter spacetimes,JHEP01(2024) 011, [arXiv:2310.1495]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    V. A. Letsios,(Non-)unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space, JHEP05(2023) 015, [arXiv:2303.0042]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Higuchi,Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,Nucl

    A. Higuchi,Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time,Nucl. Phys. B282(1987) 397–436

    work page 1987

  36. [36]

    Higuchi,Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on theNSphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO(N,1),J

    A. Higuchi,Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on theNSphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO(N,1),J. Math. Phys.28(1987) 1553. [Erratum: J.Math.Phys. 43, 6385 (2002)]

    work page 1987

  37. [37]

    Higuchi,Massive Symmetric Tensor Field in Space-times With a Positive Cosmological Constant,Nucl

    A. Higuchi,Massive Symmetric Tensor Field in Space-times With a Positive Cosmological Constant,Nucl. Phys. B325(1989) 745–765

    work page 1989

  38. [38]

    I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. R. Safdi,F-Theorem without Supersymmetry,JHEP10 (2011) 038, [arXiv:1105.4598]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    AdS Description of Induced Higher-Spin Gauge Theory

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, B. R. Safdi, and G. Tarnopolsky,AdS Description of Induced Higher-Spin Gauge Theory,JHEP10(2013) 016, [arXiv:1306.5242]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    M¨ uhlmann,A two dimensional higher spin theory, (to appear)

    B. M¨ uhlmann,A two dimensional higher spin theory, (to appear)

    work page

  41. [41]

    Light States in Chern-Simons Theory Coupled to Fundamental Matter

    S. Banerjee, S. Hellerman, J. Maltz, and S. H. Shenker,Light States in Chern-Simons Theory Coupled to Fundamental Matter,JHEP03(2013) 097, [arXiv:1207.4195]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    M. G. Eastwood,Higher symmetries of the Laplacian,Annals Math.161(2005) 1645–1665, [hep-th/0206233]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  43. [43]

    Polchinski,The phase of the sum over spheres,Phys

    J. Polchinski,The phase of the sum over spheres,Phys. Lett. B219(1989) 251–257

    work page 1989

  44. [44]

    Giombi and Z

    S. Giombi and Z. Sun,The phase of de Sitter higher spin gravity,arXiv:2601.1525

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Anninos and B

    D. Anninos and B. M¨ uhlmann,Matrix integrals & finite holography,JHEP06(2021) 120, [arXiv:2012.0522]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Basile, X

    T. Basile, X. Bekaert, and E. Joung,Conformal Higher-Spin Gravity: Linearized Spectrum = Symmetry Algebra,JHEP11(2018) 167, [arXiv:1808.0772]

    work page arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    A. Y. Segal,Conformal higher spin theory,Nucl. Phys. B664(2003) 59–130, [hep-th/0207212]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  48. [48]

    Partition function of free conformal higher spin theory

    M. Beccaria, X. Bekaert, and A. A. Tseytlin,Partition function of free conformal higher spin theory,JHEP08(2014) 113, [arXiv:1406.3542]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    R. R. Metsaev,Shadows, currents and AdS,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 106010, [arXiv:0805.3472]. 36

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    The Wave Function of Vasiliev's Universe - A Few Slices Thereof

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, and D. Harlow,Wave function of Vasiliev’s universe: A few slices thereof,Phys. Rev. D88(2013), no. 8 084049, [arXiv:1207.5517]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  51. [51]

    The dS/CFT Correspondence

    A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034, [hep-th/0106113]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  52. [52]

    Quantum Gravity In De Sitter Space

    E. Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001.hep-th/0106109

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  53. [53]

    J. M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013, [astro-ph/0210603]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  54. [54]

    M. T. Anderson,On boundary value problems for Einstein metrics,Geom. Topol.12 (2008), no. 4 2009–2045, [math/0612647]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  55. [55]

    Anninos, D

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and C. Maneerat,Cosmological observatories,Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024), no. 16 165009, [arXiv:2402.0430]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Banihashemi, E

    B. Banihashemi, E. Shaghoulian, and S. Shashi,Thermal effective actions from conformal boundary conditions in gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025), no. 15 155004, [arXiv:2503.1747]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Hertog, and J. Karlsson,Quantum Liouville Cosmology,arXiv:2512.1596

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    J. W. York, Jr.,Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,Phys. Rev. Lett.28(1972) 1082–1085

    work page 1972

  59. [59]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, and B. M¨ uhlmann,A microscopic realization of dS 3,SciPost Phys. 18(2025), no. 4 131, [arXiv:2501.0148]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,Norm of the no-boundary state,arXiv:2506.2054

    work page arXiv 2054

  61. [61]

    The dS/dS Correspondence

    M. Alishahiha, A. Karch, E. Silverstein, and D. Tong,The dS/dS correspondence,AIP Conf. Proc.743(2004), no. 1 393–409, [hep-th/0407125]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, and M. J. Perry,Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,Nucl. Phys. B138(1978) 141–150

    work page 1978

  63. [63]

    Anninos, C

    D. Anninos, C. Baracco, S. Brian, and F. Denef,Features of the partition function of aΛ> 0 universe,JHEP01(2026) 141, [arXiv:2505.1133]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    R. G. Leigh and A. C. Petkou,Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4),JHEP 06(2003) 011, [hep-th/0304217]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  65. [65]

    Lang and Y

    J. Lang and Y. Neiman,N= 2 supersymmetry in the twistor description of higher-spin holography,JHEP05(2024) 341, [arXiv:2402.0122]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Pilch, P

    K. Pilch, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, and M. F. Sohnius,De Sitter Superalgebras and Supergravity,Commun. Math. Phys.98(1985) 105

    work page 1985

  67. [67]

    Lukierski and A

    J. Lukierski and A. Nowicki,All Possible De Sitter Superalgebras and the Presence of Ghosts,Phys. Lett. B151(1985) 382–386

    work page 1985

  68. [68]

    Anninos, P

    D. Anninos, P. Benetti Genolini, and B. M¨ uhlmann,dS 2 supergravity,JHEP11(2023) 145, [arXiv:2309.0248]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Anninos, C

    D. Anninos, C. Baracco, V. A. Letsios, and G. A. Silva,Fermionic fields of higher spin in de Sitter space,arXiv:2510.1965

    work page arXiv 1965

  70. [70]

    Chen, Y.-t

    W.-M. Chen, Y.-t. Huang, Z.-X. Huang, and Y. Liu,Fermionic Boundary Correlators in (EA)dS space,arXiv:2512.2209. 37

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Higuchi and V

    A. Higuchi and V. A. Letsios,Unitary rigid supersymmetry for the chiral graviton and chiral gravitino in de Sitter spacetime,JHEP12(2025) 104, [arXiv:2503.0451]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Boulanger, V

    N. Boulanger, V. A. Letsios, and S. Thom´ ee,The complete action forN=2de Sitter pure supergravity,arXiv:2601.1689

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions

    S. Giombi and X. Yin,Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions,JHEP09(2010) 115, [arXiv:0912.3462]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    N. Hama, K. Hosomichi, and S. Lee,Notes on SUSY Gauge Theories on Three-Sphere, JHEP03(2011) 127, [arXiv:1012.3512]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [75]

    Willett,Localization on three-dimensional manifolds,J

    B. Willett,Localization on three-dimensional manifolds,J. Phys. A50(2017), no. 44 443006, [arXiv:1608.0295]

    work page arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Yoon,Supersymmetric SYK Model: Bi-local Collective Superfield/Supermatrix Formulation,JHEP10(2017) 172, [arXiv:1706.0591]

    J. Yoon,Supersymmetric SYK Model: Bi-local Collective Superfield/Supermatrix Formulation,JHEP10(2017) 172, [arXiv:1706.0591]

    work page arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    M. A. Vasiliev,Extended higher-spin superalgebras and their realizations in terms of quantum operators,Fortschritte der Physik/Progress of Physics36(1988), no. 1 33–62

    work page 1988

  78. [78]

    From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory

    N. Drukker, M. Marino, and P. Putrov,From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory, Commun. Math. Phys.306(2011) 511–563, [arXiv:1007.3837]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  79. [79]

    Sun,AdS one-loop partition functions from bulk and edge characters,JHEP12(2021) 064, [arXiv:2010.1582]

    Z. Sun,AdS one-loop partition functions from bulk and edge characters,JHEP12(2021) 064, [arXiv:2010.1582]

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    On the uniqueness of higher-spin symmetries in AdS and CFT

    N. Boulanger, D. Ponomarev, E. D. Skvortsov, and M. Taronna,On the uniqueness of higher-spin symmetries in AdS and CFT,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28(2013) 1350162, [arXiv:1305.5180]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.