pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.02112 · v2 · pith:F6JG4JIGnew · submitted 2026-03-02 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CL

Recursive Models for Long-Horizon Reasoning

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CL
keywords modelsrecursivecontextlong-horizonmodelreasoningactivebarrier
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Modern language models reason within bounded context, an inherent constraint that poses a fundamental barrier to long-horizon reasoning. We identify recursion as a core principle for overcoming this barrier, and propose recursive models as a minimal realization, where the model can recursively invoke itself to solve subtasks in isolated contexts. We prove that any computable problem admits a recursive decomposition of reasoning in which each subtask requires only exponentially smaller active context than standard autoregressive models; this strictly surpasses any context management approach confined to a single sequence, such as summarization. We further generalize our framework to modern agentic systems with arbitrary context processing and control flows, and prove that recursive models can achieve optimal power within this broader class. Experimentally, we test two settings: fine-tuning a pretrained base model for recursive SAT solving, and training a small model from scratch on Go traces generated by exact game-tree search. Both show improved long-horizon accuracy with small active contexts.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Complexity Ceiling Benchmark: A Multi-Domain Evaluation of Sequential Reasoning Under Depth Scaling

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The Complexity Ceiling Benchmark demonstrates geometric per-step decay in LLM sequential reasoning with domain-specific performance ceilings and introduces a trace metric showing incorrect intermediate steps in some c...

  2. Pseudo-Formalization for Automatic Proof Verification

    cs.LO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Pseudo-Formalization decomposes proofs into self-contained natural language modules for independent LLM-based Block Verification, outperforming LLM-as-judge baselines on olympiad and research math benchmarks while rel...

  3. Pseudo-Formalization for Automatic Proof Verification

    cs.LO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Pseudo-Formalization decomposes natural language proofs into modular blocks for independent LLM verification via Block Verification, outperforming LLM-as-judge baselines on error detection in olympiad and research mat...