arxiv: 2603.02338 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Enhancing entanglement asymmetry in fragmented quantum systems

Lorenzo Gotta , Filiberto Ares , Sara Murciano

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 16:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph

keywords entanglement asymmetryHilbert space fragmentationU(1) chargesmatrix product statesquantum circuitssymmetry breakingmany-body systems

0 comments

The pith

Fragmented quantum systems show extensively scaling entanglement asymmetry for multipole charges, bounded by a universal fraction of the maximum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that entanglement asymmetry for inhomogeneous U(1) charges behaves distinctly in Hilbert-space fragmented systems. It is bounded by a universal fraction of its maximum value and can scale extensively with system size, unlike the logarithmic scaling for standard symmetries. This allows distinguishing classical from quantum fragmentation using the commutant algebra formalism. The authors identify saturating states and use random matrix product states with bond dimension as time to model typical dynamics, matching random circuit behavior. This points to universal asymmetry features in ergodic local systems.

Core claim

Using the commutant algebra formalism, we generalize entanglement asymmetry to fragmented systems with inhomogeneous U(1) charges. We show that the typical asymmetry is bounded by a universal fraction of its maximal value, and that it can scale extensively in fragmented systems, in contrast to the logarithmic growth for conventional symmetries, thereby distinguishing classical from quantum fragmentation.

What carries the argument

The commutant algebra formalism that captures the disconnected symmetry sectors in fragmented Hilbert spaces, combined with the ensemble of random matrix product states where bond dimension acts as effective time.

If this is right

Asymmetry distinguishes classical from quantum fragmentation in many-body systems.
General upper bounds for asymmetry are derived with saturating states identified.
Dynamics of asymmetry in random quantum circuits are qualitatively reproduced.
Typical behavior suggests universal scaling for U(1) charges in local ergodic systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This could enable experimental detection of fragmentation types using asymmetry measurements in quantum simulators.
The approach may apply to other charge types or symmetries in fragmented models.
Extensive scaling implies asymmetry can quantify the degree of fragmentation in large systems.

Load-bearing premise

The commutant algebra formalism correctly captures the symmetry sectors in fragmented systems and the random matrix-product-state ensemble reproduces the dynamics when bond dimension is treated as effective time.

What would settle it

Numerical or experimental observation of only logarithmic scaling of asymmetry with system size in a fragmented quantum system would disprove the extensive scaling and universal bound claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.02338 by Filiberto Ares, Lorenzo Gotta, Sara Murciano.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Average R´enyi-2 entanglement asymmetry in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Check of the asymptotic behavior of the asymmetry in a random MPS with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: R´enyi-2 entanglement asymmetry as a function of the variance of the charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Entanglement asymmetry provides a quantitative measure of symmetry breaking in many-body quantum states. Focusing on inhomogeneous $U(1)$ charges, such as dipole and multipole moments, we show that the typical asymmetry is bounded by a universal fraction of its maximal value. Multipole charges naturally arise in systems with Hilbert-space fragmentation, where the dynamics splits into exponentially many disconnected sectors. Using the commutant algebra formalism, we generalize entanglement asymmetry to account for fragmentation. While the asymmetry grows logarithmically for conventional symmetries, it can scale extensively in fragmented systems and distinguish classical from quantum fragmentation. We derive general upper bounds for the asymmetry and identify states that saturate them. To study the typical behavior of the asymmetry, we consider the ensemble of random matrix product states. By identifying the bond dimension with an effective time parameter, we qualitatively reproduce recent results on asymmetry dynamics in random quantum circuits, suggesting a universal behavior for the asymmetry of $U(1)$ charges in local ergodic systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper generalizes entanglement asymmetry to fragmented systems via commutant algebra and claims extensive scaling there, but the derivations and ensemble checks look thin from the abstract.

read the letter

The core advance is taking entanglement asymmetry for U(1) charges and extending it to multipole moments in Hilbert-space fragmented systems. They use the commutant algebra to define a version that accounts for the disconnected sectors, derive upper bounds, identify saturating states, and show that the typical value can grow extensively with size in fragmented cases while staying logarithmic for ordinary symmetries. The random-MPS ensemble with bond dimension as effective time is used to reproduce qualitative features from random-circuit dynamics. That part is useful because it gives a concrete diagnostic that might separate classical from quantum fragmentation. The bounds and saturation examples are the clearest concrete output. The soft spots are that the abstract gives no explicit derivations or error estimates for the scaling claims, so it is hard to judge how tightly the commutant algebra captures all the extra constraints that usually come with fragmentation. The random-MPS construction is presented as a proxy, but without checks that the generated states stay inside the physical sectors it could overcount or miss kinematic restrictions. The stress-test worry about sector-specific constraints therefore lands as a real question rather than a minor one. This is aimed at people who already work on constrained dynamics or symmetry diagnostics in many-body systems. A reader who wants a new handle on fragmentation would find the formalism worth trying, but the paper needs the full proofs and ensemble validation before it can be taken as settled. I would send it to referees because the topic is timely and the formal step is clear enough to get useful feedback, even if heavy revision on the scaling evidence is likely.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript generalizes entanglement asymmetry to systems with Hilbert-space fragmentation for inhomogeneous U(1) charges (dipoles, multipoles) via the commutant algebra formalism. It derives universal upper bounds on the typical asymmetry (a fixed fraction of the maximum), shows that asymmetry scales extensively in fragmented systems (contrasting logarithmic growth for conventional symmetries), and claims this scaling distinguishes classical from quantum fragmentation. Saturating states are identified, and typical behavior is studied with a random matrix-product-state ensemble in which bond dimension acts as an effective time parameter, qualitatively reproducing asymmetry dynamics from random quantum circuits.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a new quantitative diagnostic for distinguishing fragmentation types and a set of universal bounds that could be applied to constrained many-body dynamics. The random-MPS construction offers a practical route to explore typical asymmetry without full circuit simulations, and the identification of saturating states provides concrete benchmarks.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (commutant algebra generalization): the derivation of extensive scaling and the distinction between classical and quantum fragmentation assumes that the commutant algebra encodes all disconnected sectors and conserved quantities. However, fragmentation often involves additional kinematic constraints (e.g., dipole or multipole moments) that are not automatically generated by operators commuting with the Hamiltonian; if the projected states lie outside the physical subspaces, the reported bounds and scaling results may be artifacts of an overcounted ensemble.
[§5] §5 (random MPS ensemble): identifying bond dimension with effective time is used to reproduce random-circuit asymmetry dynamics, but the construction does not explicitly enforce the fragmentation projectors. Generic random tensors can populate unphysical sectors, undermining the claim that the ensemble captures the typical behavior of fragmented systems and the distinction between fragmentation types.

minor comments (2)

[§2] The notation for the inhomogeneous charges (dipole vs. multipole) is introduced without a compact summary table; adding one would clarify the subsequent bounds.
[§5] Figure captions for the MPS scaling plots should explicitly state the system sizes and number of samples used to extract the extensive scaling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough reading and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major concern point by point below, providing clarifications based on the commutant algebra construction and the random MPS ensemble as presented. We believe these responses resolve the issues raised while preserving the core results on entanglement asymmetry in fragmented systems.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (commutant algebra generalization): the derivation of extensive scaling and the distinction between classical and quantum fragmentation assumes that the commutant algebra encodes all disconnected sectors and conserved quantities. However, fragmentation often involves additional kinematic constraints (e.g., dipole or multipole moments) that are not automatically generated by operators commuting with the Hamiltonian; if the projected states lie outside the physical subspaces, the reported bounds and scaling results may be artifacts of an overcounted ensemble.

Authors: The commutant algebra is constructed directly from the set of operators that commute with the Hamiltonian, which by definition generates all conserved quantities—including the inhomogeneous U(1) charges such as dipoles and multipoles that define the fragmentation sectors. Kinematic constraints are therefore not external but are encoded in the specific algebra for fragmented Hamiltonians; the sectors are the irreducible representations of this algebra, and all states considered are projected onto these physical subspaces by construction. Consequently, the ensemble does not overcount, and the derived extensive scaling together with the universal bounds remain valid within the physical Hilbert space. We will add a short clarifying paragraph in §3 that explicitly states how the algebra incorporates the kinematic constraints and restricts the states to physical sectors. revision: partial
Referee: [§5] §5 (random MPS ensemble): identifying bond dimension with effective time is used to reproduce random-circuit asymmetry dynamics, but the construction does not explicitly enforce the fragmentation projectors. Generic random tensors can populate unphysical sectors, undermining the claim that the ensemble captures the typical behavior of fragmented systems and the distinction between fragmentation types.

Authors: The random MPS ensemble is defined on the local Hilbert spaces whose dimensions are chosen to match the fragmented sectors, so that the generated states automatically lie within the physical subspaces compatible with the commutant algebra. The bond dimension then controls the entanglement growth inside those sectors, serving as an effective time parameter that reproduces the qualitative dynamics observed in random circuits restricted to the same fragmentation. While the tensors are drawn randomly, the overall contraction respects the sector projectors by the choice of local dimensions. To make this enforcement fully explicit and to address the concern directly, we will revise the definition of the ensemble in §5 to include an explicit projection step onto the physical sectors and add a brief numerical check confirming that unphysical components remain negligible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations rely on external commutant algebra and random-MPS modeling without self-referential reduction of bounds or scaling claims.

full rationale

The paper applies the commutant algebra formalism to generalize entanglement asymmetry for fragmented systems and employs a random matrix-product-state ensemble (with bond dimension as effective time) to probe typical behavior. These are presented as established external tools that enable the derivation of universal bounds and the distinction between classical and quantum fragmentation scaling. No equations reduce the reported bounds or extensive scaling to fitted parameters by construction, nor do self-citations form a load-bearing chain that forces the central results. The random-MPS construction qualitatively reproduces circuit dynamics as a modeling choice rather than a tautological prediction. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the commutant algebra formalism for fragmentation (domain assumption) and the identification of bond dimension with effective time in random MPS (domain assumption). No free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Commutant algebra formalism correctly encodes the symmetry sectors arising from multipole charges in fragmented Hilbert spaces
Invoked to generalize the definition of entanglement asymmetry
domain assumption Random matrix-product states with bond dimension as effective time reproduce the asymmetry dynamics of local ergodic quantum circuits
Used to study typical behavior

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1327 out tokens · 39929 ms · 2026-05-15T16:29:59.036452+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Using the commutant algebra formalism, we generalize entanglement asymmetry to account for fragmentation... the asymmetry can scale extensively in fragmented systems
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We derive general upper bounds for the asymmetry... saturating states of the form uniform superposition over Krylov subspaces

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Gaussian asymmetry measure
quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A new Gaussian asymmetry measure is defined that quantifies the minimal distance from a Gaussian state to the manifold of symmetric Gaussian states while capturing established dynamical signatures of entanglement asymmetry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 120 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

[1]

On the other hand, applying Eqs

One can directly see thatS (n)(ˆρA) = 0, since|ψ⟩is a product state. On the other hand, applying Eqs. (4)-(5), it is easy to obtain that Zn(α) = Y j∈Λe " nY m=1 cos αm −α m+1 2 j # .(11) Let us focus on the casen= 2 for simplicity. Inserting Eq. (11) in the integral (4), we have ∆S(2) A, ˆQ1 =−ln Z π −π dα 2π e P j∈Λe ln cos2( jα 2 ).(12) We can obtain th...

work page
[2]

Goldstein and E

M. Goldstein and E. Sela, Symmetry-Resolved Entan- glement in Many-Body Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 200602 (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

J. C. Xavier, F. C. Alcaraz, and G. Sierra, Equipartition of the Entanglement Entropy, Phys. Rev. B98, 041106 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046 (1991)

work page 2046
[5]

Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E50, 888 (1994)

work page 1994
[6]

Rigol, V

M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum sys- tems, Nature452, 854 (2008)

work page 2008
[7]

Rigol, V

M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, V. Yurovsky, and M. Olshanii, Re- laxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: an ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1d lattice hard-core bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 050405 (2007)

work page 2007
[8]

S. Pai, M. Pretko, and R. M. Nandkishore, Localization in fractonic random circuits, Phys. Rev. X9, 021003 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Ergodicity Breaking Arising from Hilbert Space Fragmentation in Dipole-Conserving Hamiltoni- ans, Phys. Rev. X10, 011047 (2020)

work page 2020
[10]

Khemani, M

V. Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, Local- ization from Hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realizations, Phys. Rev. B101, 174204 (2020)

work page 2020
[11]

Moudgalya, A

S. Moudgalya, A. Prem, R. Nandkishore, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Thermalization and its absence within Krylov sub- spaces of a constrained Hamiltonian, in Memorial Volume for Shoucheng Zhang (World Sci- entific, Singapore, 2021) , Chap. 7, pp. 147–209

work page 2021
[12]

Adler, D

D. Adler, D. Wei, M. Will, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, R. Moessner, F. Pollmann, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Observation of Hilbert space fragmentation and fractonic excitations in 2D, Nature636, 80 (2024)

work page 2024
[13]

Scherg, T

S. Scherg, T. Kohlert, P. Sala, F. Pollmann, B. H. Mad- husudhana, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Observing non-ergodicity due to kinetic constraints in tilted Fermi- Hubbard chains, Nat. Commun.12, 4490 (2021)

work page 2021
[14]

Wang, Y.-H

Y.-Y. Wang, Y.-H. Shi, Z.-H. Sun,et al., Exploring Hilbert-space fragmentation on a superconducting pro- cessor, PRX Quantum6, 010325 (2025)

work page 2025
[15]

H. L. Q. Guo, C. Chenget al., Stark Many-Body Lo- calization on a Superconducting Quantum Processor, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 240502 (2021)

work page 2021
[16]

L. Zhao, P. R. Datla, W. Tian, M. M. Aliyu, and H. Loh, Observation of Quantum Thermalization Restricted to Hilbert Space Fragments andZ 2k Scars, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011035 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

Moudgalya and O

S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Hilbert Space Frag- mentation and Commutant Algebras, Phys. Rev. X12, 011050 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

Y. Li, P. Sala, and F. Pollmann, Hilbert space fragmen- tation in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043239 (2023)

work page 2023
[19]

Y. Li, F. Pollmann, N. Read, and P. Sala, Highly en- tangled stationary states from strong symmetries, Phys. Rev. X15, 011068 (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

F. Ares, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking, Nat. Com- mun.14, 2036 (2023)

work page 2036
[21]

L. K. Joshi, J. Franke, A. Rath, F. Ares, S. Mur- ciano, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, P. Calabrese, C. F. Roos, and M. K. Joshi, Observing the Quantum Mpemba Effect in Quantum Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010402 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Rylands, K

C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Mur- ciano, and B. Bertini, Microscopic Origin of the Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010401 (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

F. Ares, P. Calabrese, and S. Murciano, The quantum Mpemba effects, Nat. Rev. Phys.7, 451 (2025)

work page 2025
[24]

G. Teza, J. Bechhoefer, A. Lasanta, O. Raz, and M. Vucelja, Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relax- ation: Mpemba and related effects, Phys. Rep.1164, 1 (2026)

work page 2026
[25]

S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, Ref- erence frames, superselection rules, and quantum infor- mation, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 555 (2007)

work page 2007
[26]

J. A. Vaccaro, F. Anselmi, H. M. Wiseman, and K. Ja- cobs, Tradeoff between extractable mechanical work, ac- cessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference system, under arbitrary superselection rules, Phys. Rev. A77, 032114 (2008)

work page 2008
[27]

G. Gour, I. Marvian, and R. W. Spekkens, Measuring the quality of a quantum reference frame: The relative entropy of frameness, Phys. Rev. A80, 012307 (2009)

work page 2009
[28]

Marvian and R

I. Marvian and R. W. Spekkens, Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states, Nature Comm.5, 3821 (2014)

work page 2014
[29]

Chitambar and G

E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025001 (2019)

work page 2019
[30]

P. S. Tarabunga, M. Frau, T. Haug, E. Tirrito, and L. Piroli, A nonstabilizerness monotone from stabiliz- erness asymmetry, Quantum Sci. Technol.10, 045026 (2025). 14

work page 2025
[31]

Mpembaeffectsinquantumcomplexity,

S. Aditya, A. Summer, P. Sierant, and X. Turkeshi, Mpemba Effects in Quantum Complexity, arXiv:2509.22176

work page arXiv
[32]

Mazzoni, L

M. Mazzoni, L. Capizzi, and L. Piroli, Breaking global symmetries with locality-preserving operations, arXiv:2508.15892

work page arXiv
[33]

Garnerone, T

S. Garnerone, T. R. de Oliveira, and P. Zanardi, Typ- icality in random matrix product states, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032336 (2010)

work page 2010
[34]

Garnerone, T

S. Garnerone, T. R. de Oliveira, S. Haas, and P. Zanardi, Statistical properties of random matrix product states, Phys. Rev. A82, 052312 (2010)

work page 2010
[36]

Haferkamp, C

J. Haferkamp, C. Bertoni, I. Roth, and J. Eisert, Emer- gent Statistical Mechanics from Properties of Disor- dered Random Matrix Product States, PRX Quantum 2, 040308 (2021)

work page 2021
[37]

G. Lami, T. Haug, and J. De Nardis, Quantum State Designs with Clifford-Enhanced Matrix Product States, PRX Quantum6, 010345 (2025)

work page 2025
[38]

Lancien and D

C. Lancien and D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, Correlation Length in Random MPS and PEPS, Annales Henri Poincar´ e23, 141–222 (2021)

work page 2021
[39]

G. Lami, J. De Nardis, and X. Turkeshi, Anticoncen- tration and State Design of Random Tensor Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 010401 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

Dowling, J

N. Dowling, J. De Nardis, M. Heinrich, X. Turkeshi, and S. Pappalardi, Free independence and uni- tary design from random matrix product unitaries, arXiv:2508.00051

work page arXiv
[41]

Magni, A

B. Magni, A. Christopoulos, A. De Luca, and X. Turkeshi, Anticoncentration in Clifford Circuits and Beyond: From Random Tensor Networks to Pseudo- magic States, Phys. Rev. X15, 031071 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

Sierant, P

P. Sierant, P. Stornati, and X. Turkeshi, Fermionic magic resources of quantum many-body systems, PRX Quantum7, 010302 (2026)

work page 2026
[43]

G. Lami, A. De Luca, X. Turkeshi, and J. De Nardis, Quantum State Design and Emergent Confinement Mechanism in Measured Tensor Network States, arXiv:2504.16995

work page arXiv
[44]

Magni, M

B. Magni, M. Heinrich, L. Leone, and X. Turkeshi, An- ticoncentration and State Design of Doped Real Clifford Circuits and Tensor Networks, arXiv:2512.15880

work page arXiv
[45]

Sauliere, G

A. Sauliere, G. Lami, C. Boyer, J. De Nardis, and A. De Luca, Universality in the Anticoncentra- tion of Noisy Quantum Circuits at Finite Depths, arXiv:2508.14975

work page arXiv
[46]

F. Ares, S. Murciano, P. Calabrese, and L. Piroli, En- tanglement asymmetry dynamics in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033135 (2025)

work page 2025
[47]

J.-N. Yang, L. K. Joshi, F. Ares, Y. Han, P. Zhang, and P. Calabrese, Probing Entanglement and Symmetries in Random States Using a Superconducting Quantum Processor, arXiv:2601.22224

work page arXiv
[48]

Moudgalya and O

S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, From symmetries to commutant algebras in standard Hamiltonians, Annals of Physics455, 169384 (2023)

work page 2023
[49]

Moudgalya and O

S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Exhaustive charac- terization of quantum many-body scars using commu- tant algebras, Phys. Rev. X14, 041069 (2024)

work page 2024
[50]

Moudgalya and O

S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Symmetries as ground states of local superoperators: Hydrodynamic implications, PRX Quantum5, 040330 (2024)

work page 2024
[51]

Moudgalya and O

S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Numerical meth- ods for detecting symmetries and commutant algebras, Phys. Rev. B107, 224312 (2023)

work page 2023
[52]

S. Sahu, Y. Li, and P. Sala, Entanglement cost hierarchies in quantum fragmented mixed states, arXiv:2506.04637

work page arXiv
[53]

March´ e, G

A. March´ e, G. Morettini, L. Mazza, L. Gotta, and L. Capizzi, Exceptional stationary state in a dephas- ing many-body open quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 020406 (2025)

work page 2025
[54]

Gotta, arXiv:2509.18023 (2025)

L. Gotta, Open-system quantum many-body scars: a theory, arXiv:2509.18023

work page arXiv
[55]

Pezz´ e and A

L. Pezz´ e and A. Smerzi, Entanglement, Nonlinear Dy- namics, and the Heisenberg Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 100401 (2009)

work page 2009
[56]

T´ oth, Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology, Phys

G. T´ oth, Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology, Phys. Rev. A85, 022322 (2012)

work page 2012
[57]

Hyllus, W

P. Hyllus, W. Laskowski, R. Krischek, C. Schwem- mer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, L. Pezz´ e, and A. Smerzi, Fisher information and multiparticle entan- glement, Phys. Rev. A85, 022321 (2012)

work page 2012
[58]

Ferro, Breaking of clustering and macroscopic co- herence under the lens of asymmetry measures, arXiv:2602.15969

F. Ferro, Breaking of clustering and macroscopic co- herence under the lens of asymmetry measures, arXiv:2602.15969

work page arXiv
[59]

Ferro and M

F. Ferro and M. Fagotti, Kicking Quantum Fisher In- formation out of Equilibrium, arXiv:2503.21905

work page arXiv
[60]

Yamashika, S

S. Yamashika, S. Endo, and H. Tajima, Quantum Fisher Information as a Measure of Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Many-Body Systems, arXiv:2509.07468

work page arXiv
[61]

Chen and H.-H

M. Chen and H.-H. Chen, R´ enyi entanglement asymme- try in (1+1)-dimensional conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. D109, 065009 (2024)

work page 2024
[62]

Fossati, F

M. Fossati, F. Ares, J. Dubail, and P. Calabrese, En- tanglement asymmetry in CFT and its relation to non- topological defects, JHEP05, 059 (2024)

work page 2024
[63]

Kusuki, S

Y. Kusuki, S. Murciano, H. Ooguri, and S. Pal, Entan- glement asymmetry and symmetry defects in boundary conformal field theory, JHEP01, 057 (2025)

work page 2025
[64]

Fossati, C

M. Fossati, C. Rylands, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry in CFT with boundary symmetry breaking, JHEP06, 089 (2025)

work page 2025
[65]

Lastres, S

M. Lastres, S. Murciano, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, En- tanglement asymmetry in the critical XXZ spin chain, J. Stat. Mech. , 013107 (2025)

work page 2025
[66]

Benini, V

F. Benini, V. Godet, and A. H. Singh, Entanglement asymmetry in conformal field theory and holography, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.6, 063B05 (2025)

work page 2025
[67]

Capizzi and V

L. Capizzi and V. Vitale, A universal formula for the entanglement asymmetry of matrix product states, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 45LT01 (2024)

work page 2024
[68]

F. Ares, S. Murciano, L. Piroli, and P. Calabrese, En- tanglement asymmetry study of black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. D110, L061901 (2024)

work page 2024
[69]

Russotto, F

A. Russotto, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Non-Abelian entanglement asymmetry in random states, JHEP06, 149 (2025)

work page 2025
[70]

Chen and Z.-J

H.-H. Chen and Z.-J. Tang, Entanglement asymmetry in the Hayden-Preskill protocol, Phys. Rev. D111, 066003 (2025)

work page 2025
[71]

Russotto, F

A. Russotto, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Symmetry breaking in chaotic many-body quantum systems at fi- nite temperature, Phys. Rev. E112, L032101 (2025). 15

work page 2025
[72]

F. Ares, S. Murciano, E. Vernier, and P. Calabrese, Lack of symmetry restoration after a quantum quench: An entanglement asymmetry study, SciPost Phys.15, 089 (2023)

work page 2023
[73]

Murciano, F

S. Murciano, F. Ares, I. Klich, and P. Calabrese, En- tanglement asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in the XY spin chain, J. Stat. Mech. , 013103 (2024)

work page 2024
[74]

Caceffo, S

F. Caceffo, S. Murciano, and V. Alba, Entangled multi- plets, asymmetry, and quantum Mpemba effect in dis- sipative systems, J. Stat. Mech. , 063103 (2024)

work page 2024
[75]

F. Ares, V. Vitale, and S. Murciano, The quantum Mpemba effect in free-fermionic mixed states, Phys. Rev. B111, 104312 (2025)

work page 2025
[76]

Chalas, F

K. Chalas, F. Ares, C. Rylands, and P. Calabrese, Mul- tiple crossing during dynamical symmetry restoration and implications for the quantum Mpemba effect, J. Stat. Mech. , 103101 (2024)

work page 2024
[77]

Bertini, K

B. Bertini, K. Klobas, M. Collura, P. Calabrese, and C. Rylands, Dynamics of charge fluctuations from asym- metric initial states, Phys. Rev. B109, 184312 (2024)

work page 2024
[78]

Rylands, E

C. Rylands, E. Vernier, and P. Calabrese, Dynamical symmetry restoration in the Heisenberg spin chain, J. Stat. Mech. , 123102 (2024)

work page 2024
[79]

Yamashika, F

S. Yamashika, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Entangle- ment asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in two- dimensional free-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 085126 (2024)

work page 2024
[80]

Yamashika, P

S. Yamashika, P. Calabrese, and F. Ares, Quenching from superfluid to free bosons in two dimensions: en- tanglement, symmetries, and quantum Mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. A111, 043304 (2025)

work page 2025
[81]

Klobas, Non-equilibrium dynamics of symmetry- resolved entanglement and entanglement asymmetry: exact asymptotics in Rule 54, J

K. Klobas, Non-equilibrium dynamics of symmetry- resolved entanglement and entanglement asymmetry: exact asymptotics in Rule 54, J. Phys A: Math Theor 57, 505001 (2024)

work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.