arxiv: 2603.03540 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

The multi-wavelength vertical structure of the archetypal β Pictoris debris disk

Yinuo Han , Mark C. Wyatt , Marija R. Jankovic , Andrew Zhang , William R. F. Dent , A Meredith Hughes , Luca Matr\`a

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 16:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

keywords β Pictorisdebris diskvertical structuremulti-wavelengthwarpingscale heightplanetary perturbationsgrain size

0 comments

The pith

The β Pictoris debris disk is on average 1.5 times thicker vertically in mid-infrared than at millimeter wavelengths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The study uses multi-wavelength imaging to measure how the vertical height of the β Pictoris debris disk changes with grain size. Non-parametric modeling of radial profiles, while accounting for warping, shows the disk is thicker at shorter wavelengths and maintains a roughly constant scale height with radius. This pattern runs counter to simple collisional damping predictions and instead points to radiation pressure and random collisions acting together. The millimeter warping matches patterns seen in scattered light and supports the idea that inner giant planets are driving secular perturbations across the disk.

Core claim

The disk is on average 1.5 times thicker vertically in the mid-infrared compared to the millimeter, with the scale height relatively constant across radius. The decreasing scale height with wavelength contrasts with predictions from collisional damping and may result from the combined effect of radiation pressure and random collisions. The disk is warped at millimeter wavelengths, consistent with secular perturbation by the inner giant planets, which could also explain the constant apparent scale height and the non-Gaussian vertical profile.

What carries the argument

Non-parametric modeling of radial profiles that accounts for vertical warping to isolate intrinsic height at each wavelength.

If this is right

Constant scale height with radius implies secular perturbations from inner planets dominate the vertical structure over collisional effects.
Wavelength-dependent thickness indicates radiation pressure and random collisions together set the vertical distribution of different grain sizes.
Millimeter warping matches scattered-light findings and supports planetary perturbations as the driver of disk dynamics.
Tentative clumps in ALMA data suggest localized structures that future imaging can confirm or rule out.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same multi-wavelength vertical analysis applied to other edge-on disks could identify the dynamical signatures of unseen planets.
The results point to grain populations responding differently to radiation and collisions, offering a target for targeted dynamical simulations.
A uniform scale height across radius may mean the disk's vertical appearance remains stable even as other radial properties change.

Load-bearing premise

The modeling isolates the true vertical height at each wavelength without major biases from grain temperature, optical depth, or the precise shape of the warp.

What would settle it

Higher-resolution vertical profiles at an intermediate wavelength showing a thickness ratio different from 1.5 or a scale height that varies strongly with radius would challenge the central result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.03540 by A Meredith Hughes, Andrew Zhang, Luca Matr\`a, Marija R. Jankovic, Mark C. Wyatt, William R. F. Dent, Yinuo Han.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Imagery of 𝛽 Pic used in this study. The mid-infrared images were taken by Gemini/T-ReCS (Telesco et al. 2005; Li et al. 2012) and VLT/VISIR (Han et al. 2023). The millimeter dust continuum images were observed with ALMA Band 7 (Hull et al. 2022) and Band 6 (Matrà et al. 2019). The mid-infrared images are displayed on a linear scale capped at 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.37 and 1.9 Jy/arcsec2 respectively from the… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Rotationally subtracted ALMA images of 𝛽 Pic obtained by subtracting each image rotated by 180◦ about the star from the original image to emphasize any asymmetric features in the disk. Both images were UV-tapered to achieve an effective beam FWHM of 23 au for both images, as indicated by the ellipses. Arrows are drawn at 30, -70 and 150 au from the star along the major axis. 3.1. Azimuthal asymmetries Befo… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Difference image obtained by subtracting the Band 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: De-projected and deconvolved radial surface brightness profiles of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: One-dimensional flux of each image and fitted model obtained by summing the disk emission onto the disk’s major axis. This [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Central component-subtracted images using best-fit flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The spatially resolved SED of different radial regions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The 11.7 to 24.5 and 1300 to 24.5 𝜇m flux ratios across different radial regions in the NE side of the disk. The spectral index values are derived from the SEDs shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The radial optical depth profile of 𝛽 Pic’s debris disk. This is the mean profile derived from the ALMA Band 6 and 7 radial surface brightness profiles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Gallery of plots used to explore the millimeter vertical structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Comparison of fitted vertical profiles. The best-fit ver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: The residuals show significant improvement compared to using the original ALMA vertical height, particularly at shorter wavelengths, however there still exist structures unexplained by the models. This could indicate somewhat different forms in the vertical profile in the mid-infrared compared to the millimeter. Nonetheless, our measurements are able to compare the scale height across these wavelengths u… view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Scale height models for the NE arm of the disk in the mid-infrared. The “ALMA height models” on the left show models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: The representative scale height of the debris disk of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Thermal imaging of debris disks is resolving the vertical height in an increasing number of systems, enabling the use of the vertical structure to decode the dynamical state of the planetary system. In this study, we examine the multi-wavelength structure of the archetypical edge-on debris disk of $\beta$ Pic, extensive imaging of which across mid-infrared to millimeter wavelengths makes it the prime system to study the vertical height across different grain size populations. We non-parametrically modelled the radial profiles and constrained the vertical height at each wavelength while taking into account the vertical warping, finding the disk to be on average 1.5 times thicker vertically in the mid-infrared compared to the millimeter and the scale height to be relatively constant across radius. The decreasing scale height with wavelength is in contrast to predictions from collisional damping, and could be a result of the combined effect of radiation pressure and random collisions. We also show that the disk is warped at millimeter wavelengths and find tentative evidence for clumps in ALMA images which will require follow-up observations to confirm. The millimeter vertical warping is consistent with findings in scattered light and the secular perturbation interpretation due to the inner giant planets, which could also explain the relatively constant apparent scale height across radius, and potentially earlier findings of a non-Gaussian vertical profile which this study confirms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives the first quantitative multi-wavelength scale heights for β Pic, showing 1.5 times greater thickness in mid-IR than mm with radially constant height.

read the letter

The main advance is the set of numbers on vertical thickness: the disk looks about 1.5 times thicker at mid-infrared wavelengths than at millimeter wavelengths, and the scale height stays roughly flat with radius. They reach this by non-parametrically fitting radial profiles from existing data while modeling the warp at each band. That produces a direct comparison across grain sizes and shows the millimeter warp lines up with scattered-light results, which fits the secular perturbation picture from the inner planets. The contrast with simple collisional damping predictions is also laid out plainly, pointing instead to radiation pressure plus random collisions as a possible driver, and they confirm the non-Gaussian vertical profile seen before. These are concrete additions to a benchmark system that modelers can use right away. The soft spot is the modeling step itself. Mid-IR and millimeter data trace different grain populations with different temperatures and optical depths, and it is not obvious how cleanly the non-parametric method separates intrinsic height from those effects once the warp is folded in. The abstract gives no error bars, exclusion rules, or cross-checks, so the exact 1.5 factor and the constancy claim rest on assumptions that need to be shown in detail. The tentative ALMA clumps are noted as needing follow-up, which is fair. This is the sort of paper that people working on debris-disk dynamics and planet-disk interactions will want to see, especially anyone building models for edge-on systems or looking for templates to apply elsewhere. It adds usable numbers rather than just another image, so it deserves a serious referee to test the robustness of the extraction and tighten the error analysis.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses non-parametric modeling of radial profiles from multi-wavelength imaging (mid-IR to mm) of the edge-on β Pictoris debris disk, while accounting for vertical warping, to derive the vertical structure. It reports that the disk is on average 1.5 times thicker vertically in the mid-infrared than at millimeter wavelengths, with a relatively constant scale height across radius; the mm warping is consistent with scattered-light results and secular perturbations from the inner giant planets, and tentative clumps are noted in ALMA data.

Significance. If the central claims hold after validation, the work provides valuable multi-wavelength constraints on grain-size-dependent vertical structure in a benchmark debris disk, challenging collisional-damping expectations and supporting combined radiation-pressure and collision effects. The dynamical link to known planets adds interpretive strength and could explain the constant scale height and non-Gaussian profiles.

major comments (2)

[Modeling section] The non-parametric extraction of vertical heights from radial profiles (described in the modeling section) is load-bearing for the 1.5× thickness ratio and constant-scale-height claims. Explicit tests are needed to show that wavelength-dependent optical depth, temperature gradients, and the exact warp parametrization do not introduce systematic biases in the recovered heights, as the skeptic note correctly flags this as the weakest link.
[Results section] Results section: the reported average 1.5× mid-IR versus mm thickness and the statement that scale height is 'relatively constant across radius' lack quantitative error bars, radial variation metrics, or statistical tests for constancy. These details are required to assess whether the factor and constancy are robust or sensitive to profile-fitting choices.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: add a brief statement on error estimation, data exclusion criteria, and any validation tests performed on the non-parametric method.
[Results] The tentative ALMA clumps are mentioned but not quantified; a short table or figure panel showing their significance would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Modeling section] The non-parametric extraction of vertical heights from radial profiles (described in the modeling section) is load-bearing for the 1.5× thickness ratio and constant-scale-height claims. Explicit tests are needed to show that wavelength-dependent optical depth, temperature gradients, and the exact warp parametrization do not introduce systematic biases in the recovered heights, as the skeptic note correctly flags this as the weakest link.

Authors: We agree that validating the non-parametric approach against potential systematics is important. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection in the modeling section presenting explicit tests. These will include: (1) varying the warp parametrization within reasonable bounds and showing the impact on recovered heights; (2) simulating observations with different optical depth and temperature gradient assumptions to quantify biases; and (3) comparing results with and without warp correction. We expect these to confirm the robustness of the 1.5× ratio and constant scale height, but will report any sensitivities found. revision: yes
Referee: [Results section] Results section: the reported average 1.5× mid-IR versus mm thickness and the statement that scale height is 'relatively constant across radius' lack quantitative error bars, radial variation metrics, or statistical tests for constancy. These details are required to assess whether the factor and constancy are robust or sensitive to profile-fitting choices.

Authors: We concur that more quantitative support is needed for these key claims. We will revise the Results section to include: error bars on the average 1.5× thickness ratio derived from the profile fits; quantitative metrics of radial variation in scale height (e.g., the standard deviation across radii and any fitted radial slope); and statistical tests for constancy, such as a chi-squared goodness-of-fit test against a constant model or an F-test comparing constant vs. varying models. These additions will allow readers to better evaluate the robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central results—the average 1.5x vertical thickness in mid-IR versus millimeter, radially constant scale height, and millimeter warping—are obtained directly from non-parametric modeling of observed radial profiles across wavelengths while explicitly accounting for warping. These quantities are extracted from the data rather than derived as predictions from fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. The interpretive link to secular perturbations by the known inner planets (β Pic b and c) and consistency with prior scattered-light findings references independently established external facts and does not reduce the reported heights or warp to quantities fitted inside this work. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation steps appear in the chain; the derivation remains self-contained against the observational inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard observational modeling assumptions in debris disk imaging rather than new theoretical constructs or fitted parameters beyond the measured heights themselves.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard assumptions in non-parametric radial profile modeling and vertical height extraction from edge-on disk images
Invoked when constraining vertical structure while accounting for warping across wavelengths.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5558 in / 1238 out tokens · 81585 ms · 2026-05-15T16:02:17.129201+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We non-parametrically modelled the radial profiles and constrained the vertical height at each wavelength while taking into account the vertical warping... using the rave algorithm... MCMC sampling of (H1,H2,f1) with constant aspect ratio excluded

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Viscously Stirring Particle Disks into Lorentzians and Gaussians to Infer Dynamical and Collisional Masses (ARKS XIII)
astro-ph.EP 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Viscous stirring via gravitational scattering produces lognormal inclination distributions that yield Lorentzian vertical density profiles, which relax to Gaussians after equipartition, enabling estimates of perturber...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

[1]

2009, ApJ, 705, 529

Ahmic, M., Croll, B., & Artymowicz, P. 2009, ApJ, 705, 529

work page 2009
[2]

A., et al

Apai, D., Schneider, G., Grady, C. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 136

work page 2015
[3]

Armitage, P. J. 2020, Astrophysics of planet formation, Second Edition Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

work page 2020
[4]

Binks, A. S. & Jeffries, R. D. 2014, MNRAS, 438, L11 Bohren,C.F.&Huffman,D.R.1983,Absorptionandscatteringoflightbysmall particles (Wiley)

work page 2014
[5]

D., Krivov, A

Booth, M., Pearce, T. D., Krivov, A. V., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 6180

work page 2023
[6]

2016, A&A, 591, A27 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al

Brandeker, A., Cataldi, G., Olofsson, G., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A27 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501

work page 2016
[7]

2018, ApJ, 861, 72

Cataldi, G., Brandeker, A., Wu, Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 72

work page 2018
[8]

H., Lu, C

Chen, C. H., Lu, C. X., Worthen, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 139

work page 2024
[9]

Viscously Stirring Particle Disks into Lorentzians and Gaussians to Infer Dynamical and Collisional Masses (ARKS XIII)

Chiang, E., Pearce, T. D., Jankovic, M. R., et al. 2026, Submitted to ApJ, arXiv:2604.19743

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[10]

Chiang, E. I. & Goldreich, P. 1997, ApJ, 490, 368

work page 1997
[11]

A., Matthews, B

Crotts, K. A., Matthews, B. C., Duchêne, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 245

work page 2024
[12]

M., Carter, E

Daley, C., Hughes, A. M., Carter, E. S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 875, 87

work page 2019
[13]

I., Murray-Clay, R

Dawson, R. I., Murray-Clay, R. A., & Fabrycky, D. C. 2011, ApJ, 743, L17

work page 2011
[14]

Dent, W. R. F., Wyatt, M. C., Roberge, A., et al. 2014, Science, 343, 1490

work page 2014
[15]

Dohnanyi, J. S. 1969, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 2531

work page 1969
[16]

I., Shannon, A., & Morrison, S

Dong, J., Dawson, R. I., Shannon, A., & Morrison, S. 2020, ApJ, 889, 47

work page 2020
[17]

2025, A&A, 704, A21

Engler, N., Milli, J., Pawellek, N., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A21

work page 2025
[18]

W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1 Gáspár, A., Wolff, S. G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 790

work page 2013
[19]

2004, ARA&A, 42, 549

Goldreich, P., Lithwick, Y., & Sari, R. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 549

work page 2004
[20]

A., Ardila, D

Golimowski, D. A., Ardila, D. R., Krist, J. E., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 3109

work page 2006
[21]

2007, A&A, 461, 537

Grigorieva, A., Artymowicz, P., & Thébault, P. 2007, A&A, 461, 537

work page 2007
[22]

S., Marino, S., Sheehan, P

Hales, A. S., Marino, S., Sheehan, P. D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 161

work page 2022
[23]

Han, Y., Wyatt, M., Su, K. Y. L., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15285

work page arXiv
[24]

C., & Dent, W

Han, Y., Wyatt, M. C., & Dent, W. R. F. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 3257

work page 2023
[25]

C., & Marino, S

Han, Y., Wyatt, M. C., & Marino, S. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 3839

work page 2025
[26]

R., Lindler, D

Heap, S. R., Lindler, D. J., Lanz, T. M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 435

work page 2000
[27]

1985, Icarus, 64, 295

Hornung, P., Pellat, R., & Barge, P. 1985, Icarus, 64, 295

work page 1985
[28]

M., Duchêne, G., & Matthews, B

Hughes, A. M., Duchêne, G., & Matthews, B. C. 2018, ARAA, 56, 541

work page 2018
[29]

Hull, C. L. H., Yang, H., Cortés, P. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 49

work page 2022
[30]

Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90

work page 2007
[31]

P., Wyatt, M

Jackson, A. P., Wyatt, M. C., Bonsor, A., & Veras, D. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 3757

work page 2014
[32]

R., Wyatt, M

Jankovic, M. R., Wyatt, M. C., & Löhne, T. 2024, A&A, 691, A302 Jones,E.,Oliphant,T.,Peterson,P.,&Others.2001,SciPy:Opensourcescientific tools for Python

work page 2024
[33]

W., Chiang, E., Duchêne, G., Kalas, P., & Esposito, T

Jones, J. W., Chiang, E., Duchêne, G., Kalas, P., & Esposito, T. M. 2023, ApJ, 948, 102

work page 2023
[34]

& Jewitt, D

Kalas, P. & Jewitt, D. 1995, AJ, 110, 794

work page 1995
[35]

Kenyon, S. J. & Bromley, B. C. 2001, AJ, 121, 538

work page 2001
[36]

J., Rodet, L., et al

Lacour, S., Wang, J. J., Rodet, L., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, L2

work page 2021
[37]

M., Bonnefoy, M., Chauvin, G., et al

Lagrange, A. M., Bonnefoy, M., Chauvin, G., et al. 2010, Science, 329, 57

work page 2010
[38]

M., Gratadour, D., Chauvin, G., et al

Lagrange, A. M., Gratadour, D., Chauvin, G., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, L21 Lagrange,A.M.,Meunier,N.,Rubini,P.,etal.2019,NatureAstronomy,3,1135

work page 2009
[39]

M., Rubini, P., Nowak, M., et al

Lagrange, A. M., Rubini, P., Nowak, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A18

work page 2020
[40]

Larwood, J. D. & Kalas, P. G. 2001, MNRAS, 323, 402 Lecavelier des Etangs, A., Vidal-Madjar, A., Roberge, A., et al. 2001, Nature, 412, 706

work page 2001
[41]

& Greenberg, J

Li, A. & Greenberg, J. M. 1997, A&A, 323, 566

work page 1997
[42]

& Greenberg, J

Li, A. & Greenberg, J. M. 1998, A&A, 331, 291

work page 1998
[43]

M., & Wright, C

Li, D., Telesco, C. M., & Wright, C. M. 2012, ApJ, 759, 81 Lissauer,J.J.&Stewart,G.R.1993,inProtostarsandPlanetsIII,ed.E.H.Levy & J. I. Lunine, 1061

work page 2012
[44]

2025, ApJ, 984, L17

Longarini, C., Lodato, G., Rosotti, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, L17

work page 2025
[45]

B., Hales, A

Lovell, J. B., Hales, A. S., Kennedy, G. M., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A200

work page 2026
[46]

B., Marino, S., Wyatt, M

Lovell, J. B., Marino, S., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1978

work page 2021
[47]

A., Wilner, D

MacGregor, M. A., Wilner, D. J., Chandler, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 79

work page 2016
[48]

R., Matrà, L., & Wyatt, M

Marino, S., Cataldi, G., Jankovic, M. R., Matrà, L., & Wyatt, M. C. 2022, MN- RAS, 515, 507

work page 2022
[49]

M., et al

Marino, S., Matrà, L., Hughes, A. M., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A195

work page 2026
[50]

2019, MNRAS, 484, 1257

Marino, S., Yelverton, B., Booth, M., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1257

work page 2019
[51]

P., Hengst, S., Young, R., et al

Marshall, J. P., Hengst, S., Young, R., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2221

work page 2026
[52]

P., Milli, J., Choquet, E., et al

Marshall, J. P., Milli, J., Choquet, E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 5940 Matrà, L., Dent, W. R. F., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1415 Matrà, L., Marino, S., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A151 Matrà, L., Wyatt, M. C., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 135

work page 2023
[53]

M., Mawet, D., et al

Milli, J., Lagrange, A. M., Mawet, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A91

work page 2014
[54]

2026, A&A, 705, A199 Article number, page 21 A&A proofs:manuscript no

Milli, J., Olofsson, J., Bonduelle, M., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A199 Article number, page 21 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa59709-26

work page 2026
[55]

D., Papaloizou, J

Mouillet, D., Larwood, J. D., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Lagrange, A. M. 1997, MNRAS, 292, 896

work page 1997
[56]

Murray, C. D. & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar System Dynamics

work page 1999
[57]

Nesvold, E. R. & Kuchner, M. J. 2015, ApJ, 815, 61

work page 2015
[58]

M., et al

Nowak, M., Lacour, S., Lagrange, A. M., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, L2

work page 2020
[59]

2016, A&A, 591, A108

Olofsson, J., Samland, M., Avenhaus, H., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A108

work page 2016
[60]

2022, MNRAS, 513, 713

Olofsson, J., Thébault, P., Kral, Q., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 713

work page 2022
[61]

& Schlichting, H

Pan, M. & Schlichting, H. E. 2012, ApJ, 747, 113 Pérez, F. & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 21

work page 2012
[62]

2024, Catching a cat by the tail: Tracing Dust Dynamics in the Beta Pictoris Debris Disk in the Aftermath of Giant

Perrin, M., Chen, C., Gaspar, A., et al. 2024, Catching a cat by the tail: Tracing Dust Dynamics in the Beta Pictoris Debris Disk in the Aftermath of Giant

work page 2024
[63]

C., Kammerer, J., et al

Rebollido, I., Stark, C. C., Kammerer, J., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 69

work page 2024
[64]

P., et al

Schneiderman, T., Matrà, L., Jackson, A. P., et al. 2021, Nature, 598, 425

work page 2021
[65]

A., Kratter, K

Sefilian, A. A., Kratter, K. M., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 3123

work page 2025
[66]

2012, PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada

Shannon, A. 2012, PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada

work page 2012
[67]

2023, A&A, 675, A35

Skaf, N., Boccaletti, A., Pantin, E., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A35

work page 2023
[68]

Smallwood, J. L. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3526 Smith,K.D.,Matrà,L.,Zhang,K.,etal.2025,arXive-prints,arXiv:2511.01708

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[69]

2025, MNRAS, 539, 439

Sommer, M., Wyatt, M., & Han, Y. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 439

work page 2025
[70]

Stewart, G. R. & Ida, S. 2000, Icarus, 143, 28

work page 2000
[71]

Stuber, T. A. & Wolf, S. 2022, A&A, 658, A121

work page 2022
[72]

M., Fisher, R

Telesco, C. M., Fisher, R. S., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2005, Nature, 433, 133

work page 2005
[73]

A., et al

Terrill, J., Marino, S., Booth, R. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 1229 Thébault, P. 2009, A&A, 505, 1269 Thébault, P. & Augereau, J.-C. 2007, A&A, 472, 169

work page 2023
[74]

P., et al

Trapman, L., Longarini, C., Rosotti, G. P., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, L18 Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22

work page 2025
[75]

M., Carter, E

Vizgan, D., Hughes, A. M., Carter, E. S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 131

work page 2022
[76]

2026, A&A, 705, A203

Weber, P., Pérez, S., Baruteau, C., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A203

work page 2026
[77]

H., Law, D

Worthen, K., Chen, C. H., Law, D. R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 168

work page 2024
[78]

Wyatt, M. C. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1321

work page 2003
[79]

Wyatt, M. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 339

work page 2008
[80]

Wyatt, M. C. & Dent, W. R. F. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 589

work page 2002

Showing first 80 references.