pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.12355 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Unified theory of orientation averaging in X-ray spectroscopies: understanding polarization dependence in a Cartesian tensor approach

Sihan Zhang , Oana Bun\u{a}u , Marius Retegan , Pieter Glatzel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 11:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords X-ray absorption spectroscopyresonant inelastic X-ray scatteringorientation averagingCartesian tensorspowder samplespolarization dependenceCe L3 edge
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Cartesian tensor framework unifies orientation averaging for XAS and RIXS intensities in powder samples.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a general method that takes Cartesian transition tensors computed by quantum chemistry and converts them directly into orientation-averaged spectral intensities for randomly oriented powder samples. This yields ab initio predictions of how the signals depend on the direction and polarization of the incoming and outgoing X-rays for both X-ray absorption spectroscopy and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering. The same expressions reproduce measured RIXS spectra at the cerium L3 edge without additional fitting or case-by-case adjustments. Because the tensors are supplied in a standard Cartesian form, the approach extends in principle to any spectroscopy whose transition moments can be expressed as Cartesian tensors.

Core claim

By expressing the orientation average of Cartesian transition tensors in a compact, closed-form manner, the theory produces the powder-averaged intensity for any combination of incident and scattered X-ray polarizations and directions, delivering predictions for XAS and RIXS that match experimental data at the Ce L3 edge.

What carries the argument

The Cartesian transition tensor, which encodes the electronic transition amplitudes in laboratory coordinates and is averaged over all molecular orientations to obtain the observable powder intensity.

Load-bearing premise

The Cartesian tensors obtained from quantum-chemistry calculations faithfully represent the true transition moments and the derived averaging formulas contain no hidden approximations that would alter the powder average.

What would settle it

A high-resolution RIXS experiment on a cerium compound powder at the L3 edge that records a polarization or angular dependence measurably different from the intensities computed from the averaged Cartesian tensors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12355 by Marius Retegan, Oana Bun\u{a}u, Pieter Glatzel, Sihan Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Photon-in photon-out scattering geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Positioning of the analyzer crystals with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: There is no significant angular dependence for L3M5 (top) and L3M4 RIXS (bottom). absence of an angular dependence in the E1E1 peaks is less immediately apparent. Although we unambiguously reproduce this behavior numerically (not shown), we fur￾ther support these results with an analytical explanation. Such approach is tractable in high-symmetry situations, e.g. in Oh symmetry, but generally becomes imprac… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Valence-to-core RIXS planes recorded for each analyzer are shown. The applied mask isolates the angular-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Angular dependence in vtc RIXS. Top: constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) are powerful probes of electronic structure owing to their chemical and orbital selectivity. For powder samples, however, interpreting RIXS spectral intensities remains challenging as the measured signal is an average over all orientations. Existing theoretical treatments rely largely on spherical-tensor formalisms, which often involve complex derivations and case-specific analyses. Meanwhile, recent advances in quantum-chemistry methods have made the evaluation of transition tensors in Cartesian coordinates both accurate and straightforward. Here, we present a general theoretical framework that translates Cartesian transition tensors into physically meaningful, orientation-averaged intensities for powder samples. The formalism allows predicting angular and polarization dependences \textit{ab initio} for both XAS and RIXS and is extendable to other spectroscopies. The resulting predictions show excellent agreement with RIXS experimental data at the Ce L$_3$ edge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a Cartesian-tensor formalism for orientation averaging of X-ray absorption (XAS) and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) intensities in powder samples. It translates transition tensors computed in Cartesian coordinates by quantum-chemistry methods into orientation-averaged signals via explicit integration over the sphere, yielding ab initio predictions of angular and polarization dependences that are shown to match experimental RIXS data at the Ce L3 edge without case-specific adjustments.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a practical, algebraically equivalent alternative to spherical-tensor treatments that directly exploits the Cartesian tensors now routinely available from quantum-chemistry packages. This removes the need for case-by-case spherical-tensor reductions and extends straightforwardly to other spectroscopies, while the reported experimental agreement at the Ce L3 edge provides a concrete benchmark for the averaging expressions.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and experimental comparison section] The abstract states 'excellent agreement' with experiment; the main text should report quantitative measures (e.g., RMS deviation or reduced chi-squared) alongside the visual comparison to allow readers to judge the quality of the match independently.
  2. [Derivation of averaging contractions] The derivation of the rank-4 tensor averaging contractions is stated to be algebraically equivalent to the spherical-tensor result; an explicit side-by-side comparison of the final averaged intensity expressions (perhaps in an appendix) would make this equivalence immediately verifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately reflects the central contribution of the Cartesian-tensor approach to orientation averaging for XAS and RIXS.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The central derivation integrates rank-2 and rank-4 Cartesian transition tensors over the sphere to obtain orientation-averaged intensities for powder XAS and RIXS. These contractions are standard spherical integrals expressed in Cartesian components and are algebraically equivalent to known spherical-tensor results without introducing case-specific adjustments or hidden parameters. Transition tensors are taken directly from quantum-chemistry output and used to predict angular/polarization dependence; experimental agreement at the Ce L3 edge is presented as validation, not as a fit that defines the averaging expressions. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the formalism. The framework is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce any claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of Cartesian transition tensors produced by standard quantum-chemistry codes and on the correctness of the orientation-averaging transformation; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Cartesian transition tensors computed by quantum-chemistry methods accurately represent the physical electronic transitions
    The framework takes these tensors as input; their fidelity is assumed rather than re-derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1158 out tokens · 36540 ms · 2026-05-15T11:26:43.769600+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The problem can be tack- ledab-initioby multiconfigurational wavefunction–based quantum-chemistry methods, for example OpenMolcas

    can accurately capture these interactions, but they require adjustable parameters. The problem can be tack- ledab-initioby multiconfigurational wavefunction–based quantum-chemistry methods, for example OpenMolcas

    work page

  2. [2]

    Unified theory of orientation averaging in X-ray spectroscopies: understanding polarization dependence in a Cartesian tensor approach

    and ORCA [21], provided sufficiently large cluster models are employed [20–23]. The codes typically output transition tensors in Cartesian form, which constitutes a further practical consideration motivating our work. Al- though the Cartesian tensor formulation of X-ray spec- troscopy is well established [24, 25], powder averages for two photon processes ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    1 corresponds to the electric dipole (E1) transition while the second one, symmetric upon exchangingrandp, is the electric quadrupole (E2)

    and expand the exponential to linear order ink·r all by taking into account that momentumpand position roperators do not commute [40]: ˆT=ε·p+ i 2 (ε·p)(k·r) + (ε·r)(k·p) + i 2 (ε·p)(k·r)−(ε·r)(k·p) +O(k·r) 2 (1) The first term in Eq. 1 corresponds to the electric dipole (E1) transition while the second one, symmetric upon exchangingrandp, is the electric...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Its orientation average is: ⟨σE1E1 RIXS⟩= X ijkl ε∗ i,iεo,j ⟨Q⟩ε i,kε∗ o,l (28) withε i (εo) the incoming (outgoing) polarization

    General formalism The E1E1 RIXS term is associated to a rank-4 tensor. Its orientation average is: ⟨σE1E1 RIXS⟩= X ijkl ε∗ i,iεo,j ⟨Q⟩ε i,kε∗ o,l (28) withε i (εo) the incoming (outgoing) polarization. From this point the derivation is similar to the one of E2 XAS: ⟨σE1E1 RIXS⟩= 1 30   |εo|2|εi|2 |ε∗ o ·ε i|2 |εo ·ε i|2   T  4−1−1 −1 4−1 −1−1 4 ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Projections onto polarization channels In the previous section, we derived the general expres- sion for the RIXS scattering cross section corresponding to arbitrary incident and emitted polarizations. In prac- tice, however, this formulation has limited direct appli- cability, since most experiments employ linearly polar- ized incident light and polarizat...

    work page

  6. [6]

    the Thomson term

    Scattering from spherically symmetric states Consider the non-resonant scattering cross sectionσT h, i.e. the Thomson term. For linearly polarized light: σTh(q) =r 2 0|f0(q)|2|ˆεo · ˆεi|2 (47) wherer 0 is the classical electron radius,qthe momentum transfer andf 0(q) the atomic form factor. Thomson scat- tering originates from the spherically symmetric pa...

    work page

  7. [7]

    The round analyzer crystals have a diameter of 100mm

    Experiment setup The measurements were performed at beamline ID26 of the European Synchrotron Research Facility, using a spectrometer set in a vertical Rowland geometry [48] with sample, detector and five crystal analyzers arranged on 1m radius circles. The round analyzer crystals have a diameter of 100mm. The incoming X-ray polarization is horizontal, pa...

    work page

  8. [8]

    The embedded cluster model of CeO 2 was constructed based on crystal structures of ICSD 88759 [51]

    Computational method Transition tensors were calculated by OpenMolcas v25.06 [20, 50]. The embedded cluster model of CeO 2 was constructed based on crystal structures of ICSD 88759 [51]. Zone 1 (full-basis atoms) consisted of a Ce- centered CeO 8 12 – cluster. Zone 2 contained 400 fixed point charges, while Zone 3 contained 1000 variable point charges use...

    work page

  9. [9]

    3 we show the ctc RIXS plane for one of the analyzers

    Core-to-core L 3M5 RIXS In Fig. 3 we show the ctc RIXS plane for one of the analyzers. The main features at 4840 eV emission energy correspond to the L 3M5 resonant emission line (2p 3/2 → 5d5/2), while the weaker features at 4822 eV are the L3M4 (Lα2) line (2p 3/2 →5d 3/2). The transition paths for the L3M5 RIXS process are |g⟩ → |2p 54f 0/15d1⟩ → |3d 94...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Valence-to-core RIXS The measured vtc RIXS planes are shown in Fig. 5. The corresponding theoretical planes were computed by convoluting the transition amplitudes obtained with OpenMolcas for the different analyzer orientations. Rea- sonable agreement is obtained; however, a detailed dis- cussion is deferred to future work, as the present study focuses ex...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Abu-Samak, U

    M. Abu-Samak, U. Kumar, A. Quraishi, R. Kumar, S. Kumar, S. Dalela, M. A. Ahmad, B. Choudhary, and P. Alvi, Physica B628, 413562 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    F. M. F. de Groot, M. W. Haverkort, H. Elnaggar, A. Juhin, K.-J. Zhou, and P. Glatzel, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers4, 45 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Glatzel and U

    P. Glatzel and U. Bergmann, Coord. Chem. Rev.249, 65 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    M. Guo, O. Prakash, H. Fan, L. H. M. de Groot, V. F. Hlynsson, S. Kaufhold, O. Gordivska, N. Vel´ asquez, P. Chabera, P. Glatzel, K. W¨ arnmark, P. Persson, and J. Uhlig, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 9067 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    H. Y. Huang, A. Singh, C. I. Wu, J. D. Xie, J. Okamoto, A. A. Belik, E. Kurmaev, A. Fujimori, C. T. Chen, S. V. Streltsov, and D. J. Huang, npj Quantum Mater.7, 33 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    H. A. S. Orduz, L. Bugarin, S.-L. Heck, P. Dolcet, M. Casapu, J.-D. Grunwaldt, and P. Glatzel, J. Syn- chrotron Radiat.31, 733 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Svyazhin, V

    A. Svyazhin, V. Nalbandyan, M. Rovezzi, A. Chumakova, B. Detlefs, A. A. Guda, A. Santambrogio, A. Manceau, and P. Glatzel, Inorg. Chem.61, 869 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Beheshti Askari, M

    A. Beheshti Askari, M. al Samarai, N. Hiraoka, H. Ishii, L. Tillmann, M. Muhler, and S. DeBeer, Nanoscale12, 15185 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    M. L. Traulsen, H. W. P. de Carvalho, P. Zielke, and J. D. Grunwaldt, J. Electrochem. Soc.164, F3064 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Pedersen, K

    A. Pedersen, K. Kumar, Y.-P. Ku, V. Martin, L. Dubau, K. T. Santos, J. Barrio, V. A. Saveleva, P. Glatzel, V. K. Paidi, X. Li, A. Hutzler, M.-M. Titirici, A. Bonnefont, S. Cherevko, I. E. L. Stephens, and F. Maillard, Energy Environ. Sci.17, 6323 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Longo, F

    A. Longo, F. Giannici, M. P. Casaletto, M. Rovezzi, C. J. Sahle, P. Glatzel, Y. Joly, and A. Martorana, ACS Catal. 12, 3615 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Zasimov, L

    P. Zasimov, L. Amidani, M. Retegan, O. Walter, R. Caci- uffo, and K. O. Kvashnina, Inorg. Chem.61, 1817 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    S. M. Butorin, K. O. Kvashnina, J. R. Vegelius, D. Meyer, and D. K. Shuh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 8093 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Amidani, J

    L. Amidani, J. J. Joos, P. Glatzel, and J. c. v. Kolorenˇ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 046401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    T. G. Burrow, N. M. Alcock, M. S. Huzan, M. A. Dun- stan, J. A. Seed, B. Detlefs, P. Glatzel, M. O. J. Y. Hu- nault, J. Bendix, K. S. Pedersen, and M. L. Baker, J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 22570 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Sundermann, H

    M. Sundermann, H. Hahn, D. S. Christovam, M. W. Haverkort, R. Caciuffo, B. Keimer, L. H. Tjeng, A. Sever- ing, and H. Gretarsson, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043081 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    J. C. V´ edrine, Catalysts7, 341 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    F. M. F. de Groot, Coord. Chem. Rev.249, 31 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    Kotani and S

    A. Kotani and S. Shin, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 203 (2001)

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    Aquilante, J

    F. Aquilante, J. Autschbach, A. Baiardi, S. Battaglia, V. A. Borin, L. F. Chibotaru, I. Conti, L. De Vico, M. Delcey, I. Fdez. Galv´ an, N. Ferr´ e, L. Freitag, M. Garavelli, X. Gong, S. Knecht, E. D. Larsson, 17 R. Lindh, M. Lundberg, P. A. Malmqvist, A. Nenov, J. Norell, M. Odelius, M. Olivucci, T. B. Pedersen, L. Pedraza-Gonz´ alez, Q. M. Phung, K. Pie...

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Neese, WIRES Comput

    F. Neese, WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci.2, 73 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Li Manni, I

    G. Li Manni, I. Fdez. Galv´ an, A. Alavi, F. Aleotti, F. Aquilante, J. Autschbach, D. Avagliano, A. Ba- iardi, J. J. Bao, S. Battaglia, L. Birnoschi, A. Blanco- Gonz´ alez, S. I. Bokarev, R. Broer, R. Cacciari, P. B. Calio, R. K. Carlson, R. Carvalho Couto, L. Cerd´ an, L. F. Chibotaru, N. F. Chilton, J. R. Church, I. Conti, S. Coriani, J. Cu´ ellar-Zuqui...

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Polly, B

    R. Polly, B. Schacherl, J. Rothe, and T. Vitova, Inorg. Chem.60, 18764 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Y. Joly, S. Di Matteo, and O. Bun˘ au, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.208, 21 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Bun˘ au and Y

    O. Bun˘ au and Y. Joly, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter21, 345501 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Kotani, AIP Conf

    A. Kotani, AIP Conf. Proc.652, 338 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    D¨ oring, C

    G. D¨ oring, C. Sternemann, A. Kaprolat, A. Mattila, K. H¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, and W. Sch¨ ulke, Phys. Rev. B70, 085115 (2004)

    work page 2004

  38. [38]

    R. A. Gordon, M. W. Haverkort, S. S. Gupta, and G. A. Sawatzky, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.190, 012047 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Chabot-Couture, J

    G. Chabot-Couture, J. N. Hancock, P. K. Mang, D. M. Casa, T. Gog, and M. Greven, Phys. Rev. B82, 035113 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    M. Kang, J. Pelliciari, Y. Krockenberger, J. Li, D. E. McNally, E. Paris, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, H. Yamamoto, T. Schmitt, and R. Comin, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045105 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    B. T. Chiogo, J. Okamoto, J.-H. Li, T. Ohkochi, H.-Y. Huang, D.-J. Huang, C.-T. Chen, C.-N. Kuo, C.-S. Lue, A. Chainani, and D. Malterre, Phys. Rev. B106, 075141 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Krieger, L

    G. Krieger, L. Martinelli, S. Zeng, L. E. Chow, K. Kum- mer, R. Arpaia, M. Moretti Sala, N. B. Brookes, A. Ar- iando, N. Viart, M. Salluzzo, G. Ghiringhelli, and D. Preziosi, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 027002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    van Veenendaal, Phys

    M. van Veenendaal, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 117404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    Carra, M

    P. Carra, M. Fabrizio, and B. T. Thole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3700 (1995)

    work page 1995

  45. [45]

    Nakazawa, H

    M. Nakazawa, H. Ogasawara, and A. Kotani, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.69, 4071 (2000)

    work page 2000

  46. [46]

    Juhin, C

    A. Juhin, C. Brouder, and F. de Groot, Cent. Eur. J. Phys.12, 323 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    M. O. J. Y. Hunault, T. G. Burrow, F. Besnard, A. Juhin, and C. Brouder, Angular dependence and pow- der average of resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (2025), arXiv:2510.20731 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Tagliavini, F

    M. Tagliavini, F. Wenzel, and M. W. Haverkort, Polar- ization dependency in resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (2025), arXiv:2510.12891v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    J. J. Sakurai,Advanced Quantum Mechanics(Addison- Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1967)

    work page 1967

  50. [50]

    R. D. Peacock and B. Stewart, J. Phys. Chem. B105, 351 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    L. J. P. Ament, M. van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. van den Brink, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 705 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    M. A. Rashid, F. Ahmad, and N. Amir, Int. J. Theor. Phys.50, 479 (2011)

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    Ee, D.-W

    J.-H. Ee, D.-W. Jung, U.-R. Kim, and J. Lee, Eur. J. Phys.38, 025801 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    D. L. Andrews and T. Thirunamachandran, J. Chem. Phys.67, 5026 (1977)

    work page 1977

  55. [55]

    D. L. Andrews and W. A. Ghoul, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 14, 1281 (1981)

    work page 1981

  56. [56]

    Brouder, A

    C. Brouder, A. Juhin, A. Bordage, and M.-A. Arrio, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter20, 455205 (2008)

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    Carra, A

    P. Carra, A. Jerez, and I. Marri, Phys. Rev. B67, 045111 (2003)

    work page 2003

  58. [58]

    Glatzel, A

    P. Glatzel, A. Harris, P. Marion, M. Sikora, T.-C. Weng, C. Guilloud, S. Lafuerza, M. Rovezzi, B. Detlefs, and L. Ducott´ e, J. Synchrotron Rad.28, 362 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Retegan, DAXS: Data analysis for x-ray spec- troscopy,https://gitlab.esrf.fr/spectroscopy/daxs (2025), accessed: 2025-10-20

    M. Retegan, DAXS: Data analysis for x-ray spec- troscopy,https://gitlab.esrf.fr/spectroscopy/daxs (2025), accessed: 2025-10-20

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    I. Fdez. Galv´ an, M. Vacher, A. Alavi, C. Angeli, F. Aquilante, J. Autschbach, J. J. Bao, S. I. Bokarev, N. A. Bogdanov, R. K. Carlson, L. F. Chibotaru, J. Creutzberg, N. Dattani, M. G. Delcey, S. S. Dong, A. Dreuw, L. Freitag, L. M. Frutos, L. Gagliardi, F. Gen- dron, A. Giussani, L. Gonz´ alez, G. Grell, M. Guo, C. E. Hoyer, M. Johansson, S. Keller, S....

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    K¨ ummerle and G

    E. K¨ ummerle and G. Heger, J. Solid State Chem.147, 485 (1999)

    work page 1999

  62. [62]

    Derenzo, M

    S. Derenzo, M. Klintenberg, and M. Weber, J. Chem. Phys.112, 2074 (2000)

    work page 2074

  63. [63]

    Klintenberg, S

    M. Klintenberg, S. Derenzo, and M. Weber, Comput. Phys. Commun.131, 120 (2000)

    work page 2000

  64. [64]

    J. L. Pascual, L. Seijo, and Z. Barandiar´ an, J. Chem. Phys.98, 9715 (1993)

    work page 1993

  65. [65]

    M. A. Nygren, L. G. M. Pettersson, Z. Barandiar´ an, and 18 L. Seijo, J. Chem. Phys.100, 2010 (1994)

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    Gendron and J

    F. Gendron and J. Autschbach, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.8, 673 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    B. O. Roos, The complete active space self-consistent field method and its applications in electronic structure calculations, inAdvances in Chemical Physics(John Wi- ley & Sons, Ltd, 1987) Chap. 69, pp. 399–445

    work page 1987

  68. [68]

    B. O. Roos, P. R. Taylor, and P. E. Sigbahn, Chem. Phys. 48, 157 (1980)

    work page 1980

  69. [69]

    Siegbahn, A

    P. Siegbahn, A. Heiberg, B. Roos, and B. Levy, Phys. Scr.21, 323 (1980)

    work page 1980

  70. [70]

    P. E. M. Siegbahn, J. Alml¨ of, A. Heiberg, and B. O. Roos, J. Chem. Phys.74, 2384 (1981)

    work page 1981

  71. [71]

    P. A. Malmqvist, A. Rendell, and B. O. Roos, J. Phys. Chem.94, 5477 (1990)

    work page 1990

  72. [72]

    Douglas and N

    M. Douglas and N. M. Kroll, Ann. Phys.82, 89 (1974)

    work page 1974

  73. [73]

    B. A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A32, 756 (1985)

    work page 1985

  74. [74]

    B. A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A33, 3742 (1986)

    work page 1986

  75. [75]

    A. Wolf, M. Reiher, and B. A. Hess, J. Chem. Phys.117, 9215 (2002)

    work page 2002

  76. [76]

    T. B. Pedersen, F. Aquilante, and R. Lindh, Theor. Chem. Acc.124, 1 (2009)

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    K. G. Dyall and K. Fægri, Chem. Phys. Lett.201, 27 (1993)

    work page 1993

  78. [78]

    ˚Ake Malmqvist, B

    P. ˚Ake Malmqvist, B. O. Roos, and B. Schimmelpfennig, Chem. Phys. Lett.357, 230 (2002)

    work page 2002

  79. [79]

    Zhang, Polarixs: A python package for angular and po- larization dependent rixs convolution,https://github

    S. Zhang, Polarixs: A python package for angular and po- larization dependent rixs convolution,https://github. com/ZhangHMDS/Polarixs(2025), accessed: 2025-08-27

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Sergentu, C

    D.-C. Sergentu, C. H. Booth, and J. Autschbach, Chem. Eur. J27, 7239 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.