arxiv: 2603.28865 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-30 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

A Determination of the Top Mass from a Global PDF Analysis

Richard D. Ball , Jaco ter Hoeve , Roy Stegeman

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords top quark massparton distribution functionsNNLO QCDtoponiumglobal fitLHC measurementsalpha_selectroweak corrections

0 comments

The pith

A global fit of parton distribution functions determines the top-quark pole mass to 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a global analysis of parton distribution functions using a wide range of LHC measurements of top-quark production at NNLO accuracy in QCD with electroweak corrections. By including toponium contributions near the threshold and using approximate N3LO evolution for PDFs along with lattice constraints on the strong coupling, the authors extract a precise value for the top mass. This indirect method correlates the top mass with the PDFs and other parameters in a joint fit. A sympathetic reader would care because the top mass is a fundamental parameter of the Standard Model, and this approach provides an independent cross-check on direct measurements from collider experiments. The analysis shows that refitting the PDFs is necessary to properly account for uncertainties in the combined determination.

Core claim

The central claim is that an indirect determination of the top-quark pole mass within a global PDF analysis, incorporating NNLO QCD matrix elements with EW corrections, toponium contributions, and approximate N3LO PDF evolution with QED, yields mt = 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV. This result is obtained by analyzing single- and double-differential observables from ATLAS and CMS at 8 and 13 TeV, while accounting for missing higher-order uncertainties and using lattice constraints on alpha_s.

What carries the argument

The joint fit of PDFs together with the parameters alpha_s and mt, using the NNPDF framework with toponium corrections around the ttbar threshold.

If this is right

The inclusion of toponium contributions is essential for accurate modeling near the production threshold.
Refitting the PDFs is required to correctly correlate uncertainties between the top mass and the parton distributions.
The combined use of differential cross-section measurements from ATLAS and CMS at different energies provides strong constraints on mt.
Accounting for missing higher-order QCD uncertainties by default affects the final precision.
Lattice constraints on alpha_s help stabilize the joint fit with mt.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future direct measurements of the top mass could be compared to this value to test for consistency or hints of new physics.
This method might be extended to include more data sets or higher-order corrections to further reduce the uncertainty.
The approach demonstrates how global analyses can extract fundamental parameters beyond just PDFs.
Discrepancies with other determinations could point to issues in the modeling of top production or PDF uncertainties.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the NNLO QCD matrix elements plus EW corrections plus toponium contributions, together with the chosen data selection and missing-higher-order uncertainty prescription, fully capture the sensitivity of the included ATLAS and CMS measurements without significant bias from unmodeled effects.

What would settle it

A new global PDF fit using different data or higher-order calculations that yields a top mass value outside the range 172.54 to 173.06 GeV would challenge the result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.28865 by Jaco ter Hoeve, Richard D. Ball, Roy Stegeman.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present an indirect determination of the top-quark pole mass $m_t$ within a global analysis of parton distribution functions (PDFs), based on the public NNPDF framework. We consider a wide range of measurements, including both single- and double-differential observables, computed at NNLO QCD accuracy with EW corrections, and analyse their individual as well as combined impact on the joint $(\alpha_s, m_t)$ parameter space, while accounting for PDF evolution up to approximate ${\rm N^3LO}$ QCD accuracy with QED corrections. We account for missing higher order QCD uncertainties by default. Unique to our analysis are the inclusion of, first, toponium contributions around the $t\bar{t}$ threshold, second, state-of-the-art constraints on $\alpha_s$ from the lattice, and finally, a detailed sensitivity study of the various ATLAS and CMS differential cross-section measurements at 8 and 13 TeV. We demonstrate explicitly how a combined determination requires the refitting of the PDFs in order to correctly correlate uncertainties. We find $m_t = 172.80 \pm 0.26$ GeV at approximate N$^3$LO QCD including NLO QED, EW and toponium corrections.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This NNPDF fit gives mt = 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV by adding toponium threshold terms and lattice alpha_s priors with explicit PDF refitting.

read the letter

The main result is an indirect top pole mass of 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV extracted inside a global NNPDF analysis. The distinctive pieces are the toponium contributions near threshold, the lattice constraint on alpha_s, and the demonstration that the PDFs must be refitted to capture the correlations when mt is varied along with the partons. They also run a sensitivity check on the ATLAS and CMS single- and double-differential ttbar data at 8 and 13 TeV, all at NNLO QCD plus EW and approximate N3LO evolution with QED and a default missing-higher-order uncertainty treatment. The framework is public, so the numerical steps are traceable. The central value sits where one would expect from a careful combination of these inputs, and the quoted uncertainty already folds in the chosen data selection and modeling choices. No internal inconsistency shows up in the construction, and the result is not circular by the paper's own equations. The main assumption is that the selected theory corrections plus the data cuts fully represent the measurements without large unmodeled biases. That is a standard assumption in this field and looks reasonable here, though a referee would want to see the precise cut definitions and error propagation details. Those are normal points rather than fatal gaps. This is incremental precision QCD work aimed at people who do PDF fits or indirect mass extractions. A reader who needs a recent PDF-based mt value or wants to see how toponium and lattice inputs shift the fit will get concrete technical value. It is not reshaping the field but it is solid enough to deserve serious referee time.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an indirect determination of the top-quark pole mass mt within the NNPDF global PDF framework. It incorporates NNLO QCD matrix elements with NLO EW corrections and toponium contributions for single- and double-differential ttbar observables from ATLAS and CMS at 8 and 13 TeV, approximate N3LO QCD evolution with QED corrections, lattice constraints on αs, and a default missing-higher-order uncertainty prescription. The analysis explicitly refits the PDFs to propagate correlations between mt, αs and the PDFs, yielding the result mt = 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work demonstrates that a global PDF fit can deliver a competitive determination of mt while correctly accounting for PDF uncertainties through refitting. Strengths include the explicit inclusion of toponium threshold contributions, the use of lattice αs constraints, and the demonstration that refitting is required to avoid underestimating correlations. This approach provides a useful cross-check on direct mt measurements and illustrates how higher-order corrections and data sensitivity can be jointly controlled in a global analysis.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and Section 4] Abstract and Section 4 (results): the quoted uncertainty of ±0.26 GeV relies on the chosen data selection and MHOU prescription fully capturing the sensitivity of the included ATLAS/CMS measurements. The manuscript should provide explicit quantitative tests (e.g., variations of kinematic cuts or alternative MHOU schemes) to confirm that unmodeled effects do not introduce bias at the reported precision.
[Section 3] Section 3 (methodology): while the necessity of PDF refitting is demonstrated, the propagation of the joint (αs, mt) uncertainties through the approximate N3LO evolution and toponium corrections should be shown in more detail, including the impact on the final error budget, to substantiate that the quoted uncertainty is robust.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'approximate N3LO QCD' should be clarified with a brief statement of the approximation scheme used for the evolution.
[Section 5] Figure captions and Section 5: ensure all panels explicitly label the inclusion or exclusion of toponium and EW corrections so that the sensitivity study is immediately readable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment recommending minor revision. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions that will be implemented to strengthen the presentation and robustness of the results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and Section 4] Abstract and Section 4 (results): the quoted uncertainty of ±0.26 GeV relies on the chosen data selection and MHOU prescription fully capturing the sensitivity of the included ATLAS/CMS measurements. The manuscript should provide explicit quantitative tests (e.g., variations of kinematic cuts or alternative MHOU schemes) to confirm that unmodeled effects do not introduce bias at the reported precision.

Authors: We agree that additional quantitative tests would further substantiate the robustness of the quoted uncertainty. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit variations of the kinematic cuts on the ATLAS and CMS single- and double-differential ttbar data sets together with results obtained under an alternative MHOU prescription. These tests will be presented in Section 4 and will demonstrate that the central value and uncertainty remain stable within the reported precision, confirming that unmodeled effects do not introduce bias at the quoted level. revision: yes
Referee: [Section 3] Section 3 (methodology): while the necessity of PDF refitting is demonstrated, the propagation of the joint (αs, mt) uncertainties through the approximate N3LO evolution and toponium corrections should be shown in more detail, including the impact on the final error budget, to substantiate that the quoted uncertainty is robust.

Authors: We concur that a more detailed account of the uncertainty propagation would improve clarity. In the revised version we will expand Section 3 to include an explicit step-by-step description of how the joint (αs, mt) uncertainties are propagated through the approximate N3LO QCD evolution and the toponium threshold corrections. We will also provide a quantitative breakdown of the individual contributions of these effects to the final error budget on mt, supported by additional tables or figures as appropriate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the top mass determination

full rationale

The paper extracts mt by performing a global fit of PDFs and the top mass parameter to independent experimental ttbar cross-section data from ATLAS and CMS, using standard NNLO QCD matrix elements supplemented by EW, QED, and toponium corrections plus approximate N3LO evolution. The central result mt = 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV is the numerical output of this chi-squared minimization against external measurements; it does not reduce by the paper's own equations to a quantity defined in terms of itself, nor is any fitted input relabeled as a prediction. Lattice alpha_s constraints and the MHOU prescription are external inputs. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatze imported from prior author work are invoked to force the result. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The determination rests on standard QCD assumptions plus two fitted parameters (mt and αs) and the inclusion of toponium as an additional correction; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)

top-quark pole mass mt
Central parameter varied in the global fit to data.
strong coupling αs
Fitted jointly with mt in the (αs, mt) parameter space.

axioms (2)

domain assumption NNLO QCD matrix elements plus EW corrections plus toponium contributions accurately describe the included observables
Invoked when computing theory predictions for the fit.
domain assumption Missing higher-order QCD uncertainties can be estimated by the chosen prescription
Used to assign theory uncertainties in the fit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1403 out tokens · 60863 ms · 2026-05-14T21:34:16.194635+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Proton Structure from Neural Simulation-Based Inference at the LHC
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

Neural simulation-based inference on unbinned top-quark pair data at 13 TeV yields improved gluon PDF precision over traditional binned analyses while incorporating experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 19 internal anchors

[1]

A. H. Hoang,What is the Top Quark Mass?,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70(2020) 225 [2004.12915]. [19]Gfitter Groupcollaboration,The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 3046 [1407.3792]

work page arXiv 2020
[2]

de Blas, M

J. de Blas, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, A. Goncalves, S. Mishima, M. Pierini et al.,Global analysis of electroweak data in the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 033003 [2112.07274]

work page arXiv 2022
[3]

Kassabov, M

Z. Kassabov, M. Madigan, L. Mantani, J. Moore, M. Morales Alvarado, J. Rojo et al.,The top quark legacy of the LHC Run II for PDF and SMEFT analyses,JHEP05(2023) 205 [2303.06159]

work page arXiv 2023
[4]

Celada, T

E. Celada, T. Giani, J. ter Hoeve, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia et al.,Mapping the SMEFT at high-energy colliders: from LEP and the (HL-)LHC to the FCC-ee,JHEP09 (2024) 091 [2404.12809]

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

Scale Invariant Instantons and the Complete Lifetime of the Standard Model

A. Andreassen, W. Frost and M. D. Schwartz,Scale Invariant Instantons and the Complete Lifetime of the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 056006 [1707.08124]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[6]

Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO

G. Degrassi, S. Di Vita, J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori et al.,Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO,JHEP08(2012) 098 [1205.6497]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[7]

Higgs boson mass and new physics

F. Bezrukov, M. Y. Kalmykov, B. A. Kniehl and M. Shaposhnikov,Higgs Boson Mass and New Physics,JHEP10(2012) 140 [1205.2893]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[8]

A. V. Bednyakov, B. A. Kniehl, A. F. Pikelner and O. L. Veretin,Stability of the Electroweak Vacuum: Gauge Independence and Advanced Precision,Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 201802 [1507.08833]. [27]CDFcollaboration,Observation of top quark production in¯ppcollisions,Phys. Rev. Lett. 74(1995) 2626 [hep-ex/9503002]. [28]D0collaboration,Observation of the top q...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[9]

Parton Distribution Functions, $\alpha_s$ and Heavy-Quark Masses for LHC Run II

S. Alekhin, J. Bl¨ umlein, S. Moch and R. Placakyte,Parton distribution functions,α s, and heavy-quark masses for LHC Run II,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 014011 [1701.05838]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

M. V. Garzelli, L. Kemmler, S. Moch and O. Zenaiev,Heavy-flavor hadro-production with heavy-quark masses renormalized in the MS, MSR and on-shell schemes,JHEP04(2021) 043 [2009.07763]

work page arXiv 2021
[11]

A. M. Cooper-Sarkar, M. Czakon, M. A. Lim, A. Mitov and A. S. Papanastasiou, Simultaneous extraction ofα s andm t from LHCt ¯tdifferential distributions,2010.04171

work page arXiv 2010
[12]

Cridge and M

T. Cridge and M. A. Lim,Constraining the top-quark mass within the global MSHT PDF fit,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 805 [2306.14885]

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

M. V. Garzelli, J. Mazzitelli, S. O. Moch and O. Zenaiev,Top-quark pole mass extraction at NNLO accuracy, from total, single- and double-differential cross sections fort t+ X production at the LHC,JHEP05(2024) 321 [2311.05509]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Holguin, I

J. Holguin, I. Moult, A. Pathak, M. Procura, R. Sch¨ ofbeck and D. Schwarz,Using the W Boson as a Standard Candle to Reach the Top: Calibrating Energy-Correlator-Based Top Mass Measurements,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 231903 [2311.02157]. – 39 –

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

Alekhin, M

S. Alekhin, M. V. Garzelli, S. O. Moch and O. Zenaiev,NNLO PDFs driven by top-quark data,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 162 [2407.00545]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Forte and Z

S. Forte and Z. Kassabov,Whyα s cannot be determined from hadronic processes without simultaneously determining the parton distributions,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 182 [2001.04986]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

Forte, J

S. Forte, J. Rojo and R. Stegeman,Extractions of the strong coupling from collider data without PDF refitting are biased, in2025 European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics, 11, 2025,2511.22561. [50]NNPDFcollaboration,A determination ofα s(mZ)at aN 3LOQCD ⊗NLO QED accuracy from a global PDF analysis,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1001 [2506.13871]

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

R. D. Ball, A. Chiefa and R. Stegeman,Parton distributions with higher twist and jet power corrections,2511.14387

work page arXiv
[19]

R. D. Ball and A. Deshpande,The proton spin, semi-inclusive processes, and measurements at a future Electron Ion Collider,published in‘From My Vast Repertoire ...: Guido Altarelli’s Legacy’, eds A. Levy, S. Forte and G. Ridolfi,, pp. 205–226. World Scientific, 2019.1801.04842. 10.1142/97898132380530011. [53]NNPDFcollaboration,Nuclear Uncertainties in the ...

work page doi:10.1142/97898132380530011 2019
[20]

R. D. Ball and R. L. Pearson,Correlation of theoretical uncertainties in PDF fits and theoretical uncertainties in predictions,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 830 [2105.05114]. [56]NNPDFcollaboration,The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 428 [2109.02653]. [57]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of a cross-section enhancement near thet ¯t...

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Del Debbio, T

L. Del Debbio, T. Giani and M. Wilson,Bayesian approach to inverse problems: an application to NNPDF closure testing,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 330 [2111.05787]

work page arXiv 2022
[22]

L. A. Harland-Lang, T. Cridge and R. S. Thorne,A stress test of global PDF fits: closure testing the MSHT PDFs and a first direct comparison to the neural net approach,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 316 [2407.07944]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Barontini, M

A. Barontini, M. N. Costantini, G. De Crescenzo, S. Forte and M. Ubiali,Evaluating the faithfulness of PDF uncertainties in the presence of inconsistent data,2503.17447. – 40 –

work page arXiv
[24]

Devoto, T

S. Devoto, T. Jezo, S. Kallweit and C. Schwan,MATRIX HAWAII: PineAPPL interpolation grids with MATRIX,2506.14486

work page arXiv
[25]

Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX

M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and M. Wiesemann,Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 537 [1711.06631]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[26]

Carrazza, E

S. Carrazza, E. R. Nocera, C. Schwan and M. Zaro,PineAPPL: combining EW and QCD corrections for fast evaluation of LHC processes,JHEP12(2020) 108 [2008.12789]

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

Schwan, T

C. Schwan, T. R. Rabemananjara, A. Candido, F. Hekhorn, T. Sharma, S. Carrazza et al., Nnpdf/pineappl: v1.0.0, June, 2025. 10.5281/zenodo.15635174

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15635174 2025
[28]

Czakon, Z

M. Czakon, Z. Kassabov, A. Mitov, R. Poncelet and A. Popescu,HighTEA: high energy theory event analyser,J. Phys. G51(2024) 115002 [2304.05993]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP07(2014) 079 [1405.0301]. [71]NNPDFcollaboration,Determination of the theory uncertainties from missing higher orders on NNLO par...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[30]

Candido, F

A. Candido, F. Hekhorn and G. Magni,EKO: evolution kernel operators,Eur. Phys. J. C 82(2022) 976 [2202.02338]

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

Candido, F

A. Candido, F. Hekhorn and G. Magni,Nnpdf/eko: v0.14.6, June, 2025. 10.5281/zenodo.15655642. [75]NNPDFcollaboration,Photons in the proton: implications for the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C 84(2024) 540 [2401.08749]

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15655642 2025
[32]

Ablinger, A

J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Bl¨ umlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider et al., The non-first-order-factorizable contributions to the three-loop single-mass operator matrix elements AQg(3) and∆AQg(3),Phys. Lett. B854(2024) 138713 [2403.00513]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Falcioni, F

G. Falcioni, F. Herzog, S. Moch, A. Pelloni and A. Vogt,Four-loop splitting functions in QCD – the gluon-gluon case –,Phys. Lett. B860(2025) 139194 [2410.08089]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW

M. Czakon, D. Heymes, A. Mitov, D. Pagani, I. Tsinikos and M. Zaro,Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW,JHEP10(2017) 186 [1705.04105]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[35]

B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and Y.-J. Zheng,Signatures of toponium formation in LHC run 2 data,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 034023 [2102.11281]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and Y.-J. Zheng,Simulating toponium formation signals at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 157 [2411.18962]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

V. S. Fadin and V. A. Khoze,Threshold Behavior of Heavy Top Production in e+ e- Collisions,JETP Lett.46(1987) 525

work page 1987
[38]

V. S. Fadin, V. A. Khoze and T. Sjostrand,On the Threshold Behavior of Heavy Top Production,Z. Phys. C48(1990) 613

work page 1990
[39]

Maltoni, C

F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC,JHEP03(2024) 099 [2401.08751]. – 41 –

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Bound-state effects on kinematical distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders

Y. Sumino and H. Yokoya,Bound-state effects on kinematical distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders,JHEP09(2010) 034 [1007.0075]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[41]

M. A. Braun,Positronium Singularities in Quantum Electrodynamics and Perturbation Theory,Sov. Phys. JETP27(1968) 652

work page 1968
[42]

Remarks on the effect of bound states and threshold in g-2

K. Melnikov, A. Vainshtein and M. Voloshin,Remarks on the effect of bound states and threshold in g-2,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 017301 [1402.5690]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[43]

M. I. Eides,Recent ideas on the calculation of lepton anomalous magnetic moments,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 057301 [1402.5860]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[44]

Threshold singularities, dispersion relations and fixed-order perturbative calculations

M. Beneke and P. Ruiz-Femenia,Threshold singularities, dispersion relations and fixed-order perturbative calculations,JHEP08(2016) 145 [1606.02434]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[45]

Nason, E

P. Nason, E. Re and L. Rottoli,Spin correlations int tproduction and decay at the LHC in QCD perturbation theory,JHEP10(2025) 149 [2505.00096]. [90]CMScollaboration,Measurement of differential cross sections for the production of top quark pairs and of additional jets in lepton+jets events from pp collisions at √s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 112003 [1803...

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

On the positivity of MSbar parton distributions

A. Candido, S. Forte, T. Giani and F. Hekhorn,On the positivity of MS parton distributions,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 335 [2308.00025]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[47]

Bailey and L

S. Bailey and L. Harland-Lang,Differential Top Quark Pair Production at the LHC: Challenges for PDF Fits,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 60 [1909.10541]

work page arXiv 2020
[48]

R. D. Ball, S. Forte and R. Stegeman,Correlation and combination of sets of parton distributions,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 1046 [2110.08274]

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II

J. Butterworth et al.,PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II,J. Phys. G43(2016) 023001 [1510.03865]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[50]

M. L. Czakon et al.,Top quark pair production at complete NLO accuracy with NNLO+NNLL’ corrections in QCD,Chin. Phys. C44(2020) 083104 [1901.08281]

work page arXiv 2020
[51]

J. C. Collins and R. K. Ellis,Heavy Quark Production in Very High-Energy Hadron Collisions,Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 3

work page 1991
[52]

R. D. Ball and R. K. Ellis,Heavy quark production at high-energy,JHEP05(2001) 053 [hep-ph/0101199]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[53]

Silvetti and M

F. Silvetti and M. Bonvini,Differential heavy quark pair production at small x,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 267 [2211.10142]

work page arXiv 2023
[54]

Top Quark Pair Production beyond NNLO

C. Muselli, M. Bonvini, S. Forte, S. Marzani and G. Ridolfi,Top Quark Pair Production beyond NNLO,JHEP08(2015) 076 [1505.02006]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[55]

High-Precision c and b Masses, and QCD Coupling from Current-Current Correlators in Lattice and Continuum QCD

C. McNeile, C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, K. Hornbostel and G. P. Lepage,High-Precision c and b Masses, and QCD Coupling from Current-Current Correlators in Lattice and Continuum QCD,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 034512 [1004.4285]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[56]

High-precision quark masses and QCD coupling from $n_f=4$ lattice QCD

B. Chakraborty, C. T. H. Davies, B. Galloway, P. Knecht, J. Koponen, G. C. Donald et al., High-precision quark masses and QCD coupling fromn f = 4lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 054508 [1408.4169]. – 42 – [103]ALPHAcollaboration,Determination ofα s(mZ)by the non-perturbative decoupling method,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 1092 [2209.14204]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[57]

Petreczky and J

P. Petreczky and J. H. Weber,Strong coupling constant from moments of quarkonium correlators revisited,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 64 [2012.06193]

work page arXiv 2022
[58]

Ayala, X

C. Ayala, X. Lobregat and A. Pineda,Determination ofα(M z)from an hyperasymptotic approximation to the energy of a static quark-antiquark pair,JHEP09(2020) 016 [2005.12301]. [106]TUMQCDcollaboration,Determination of the QCD coupling from the static energy and the free energy,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 114511 [1907.11747]

work page arXiv 2020
[59]

S. Cali, K. Cichy, P. Korcyl and J. Simeth,Running coupling constant from position-space current-current correlation functions in three-flavor lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 242002 [2003.05781]. [108]ALPHAcollaboration,QCD Coupling from a Nonperturbative Determination of the Three-FlavorΛParameter,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 102001 [1706.03821]. [10...

work page arXiv 2020
[60]

The Realistic Lattice Determination of alpha_s(M_Z) Revisited

K. Maltman, D. Leinweber, P. Moran and A. Sternbeck,The Realistic Lattice Determination of alpha(s)(M(Z)) Revisited,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 114504 [0807.2020]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[61]

Bailey, T

S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin and R. S. Thorne,Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 341 [2012.04684]. [112]NNPDFcollaboration,Parton distributions from high-precision collider data,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663 [1706.00428]. [113]ATLAScollaboration,Inclusive and dif...

work page arXiv 2021
[62]

de Blas, M

J. de Blas, M. Pierini, L. Reina and L. Silvestrini,Impact of the Recent Measurements of the Top-Quark and W-Boson Masses on Electroweak Precision Fits,Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 271801 [2204.04204]

work page arXiv 2022
[63]

E. Cole, M. N. Costantini, E. Hammou, L. Mantani, F. Merlotti, M. Morales-Alvarado et al.,Tailored PDFs for New Physics searches,2602.20235. – 43 –

work page arXiv