On the Double Lambert Series Conjecture of Andrews-Dixit--Schultz-Yee
classification
🧮 math.NT
keywords
andrewsconjecturedoublelambertproofseriesamdeberhanandrews-dixit--schultz-yee
read the original abstract
Andrews, Dixit, Schultz, and Yee conjecture the parity of a double Lambert series. In 2026, Amdeberhan, Andrews, and Ballantine offer some ideas that are pointing in the right direction for the proof. In this paper, we complete the rest of their proof.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Two Proofs of a Conjecture of Amdeberhan, Andrews and Ballantine for double Lambert series and a new Representation for $E_2(q)$
Proves the coefficient of q^{N 2^a} in the double sum equals sigma_1(N) via transformation to a single sum and a new representation of E2(q).
-
Two Proofs of a Conjecture of Amdeberhan, Andrews and Ballantine for double Lambert series and a new Representation for $E_2(q)$
Two proofs establish that [q^{N 2^a}] of the double sum equals σ1(N), and one yields a new expression for E2(q).
-
Transformation Formulae and Applications for Double Lambert Series
Establishes transformation formulae for double Lambert series with applications to conjectures by Andrews, Dixit, Schultz, Yee and Amdeberhan et al.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.