pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09109 · v2 · pith:2WTR2E5Knew · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🧮 math.OC

Portfolio Exponential Utility Maximization with Jump Signals

Lokmane Abbas Turki (SU) , Sigui Brice Dro (SU) , Idris Kharroubi (SU) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 09:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords exponential utilityportfolio optimizationjump processesbackward stochastic differential equationsPoisson measuremartingale optimality principlesemimartingalesenlarged filtration
0
0 comments X

The pith

The optimal value and strategy for exponential utility maximization with jump signals are given by the solution to a new BSDE with jumps.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how an investor maximizes expected exponential utility when the risky asset price evolves under both Brownian motion and an independent homogeneous Poisson measure, with the added feature that strategies may react immediately to signals generated by the Poisson process. The authors first represent the controlled portfolio as a semimartingale and invoke the martingale optimality principle to reduce the problem to finding a solution of a backward stochastic differential equation that incorporates the jumps. If such a solution exists, both the highest attainable utility and an explicit optimal trading rule are recovered directly from it. The work proves existence of the BSDE solution under the stated model assumptions and illustrates through numerics that access to jump signals produces a measurable gain in utility compared with strategies that ignore them.

Core claim

The optimal value and an optimal strategy for the exponential utility maximization problem are expressed using the solution to an original BSDE with jumps; existence of a solution to this BSDE is proved.

What carries the argument

An original backward stochastic differential equation with jumps derived from the martingale optimality principle applied to semimartingale portfolios, whose solution yields both the value function and the optimal strategy.

If this is right

  • The maximal expected exponential utility equals the initial capital times an exponential of the BSDE solution evaluated at time zero.
  • An optimal strategy is obtained by feeding the BSDE solution components into a feedback formula that reacts to both continuous and jump information.
  • Existence of the BSDE solution directly implies existence of an optimal portfolio in the enlarged filtration.
  • Numerical approximation of the BSDE quantifies the utility improvement attributable to the jump signals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reduction to a BSDE might be attempted for power or other utility functions once suitable integrability conditions are verified.
  • Markets in which jump arrival times carry predictive content for future returns could be priced more accurately by embedding the same jump filtration into the optimization.
  • Real-time detection of Poisson-type events, such as large trades or news arrivals, could be integrated into automated trading systems to capture the documented utility gains.

Load-bearing premise

The Poisson measure is independent of the Brownian motion and homogeneous, and admissible strategies are permitted to depend on the information generated by a process driven by this Poisson measure.

What would settle it

A concrete numerical counterexample in which the candidate strategy constructed from a purported BSDE solution fails to attain the claimed optimal utility, or in which no solution to the BSDE can be found despite the independence and homogeneity assumptions holding.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09109 by Idris Kharroubi (SU), Lokmane Abbas Turki (SU), Sigui Brice Dro (SU).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: On the left we have the numerical solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the portfolio utility maximization in the case where the risky asset is driven by a Brownian motion and an independent homogeneous Poisson measure, with strategies that may include jump signals. This means that the allowed strategies are no longer predictable but also include the information given by a process driven by the Poisson measure. Using the results of Bank and K{\"o}rber [1], we first express the considered portfolio as semi-martingale processes. We then present the martingale optimality principle for the exponential utility maximization. This allows to derive an original BSDE with jumps and to express the optimal value and an optimal strategy using the solution to this original BSDE. We then prove existence of a solution to the considered BSDE. We finally present some numerical experiments to quantify the gain of utility given by the information from the jump signals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies exponential utility maximization for a portfolio with a risk-free asset and a risky asset driven by Brownian motion and an independent homogeneous Poisson measure. Admissible strategies may depend on information generated by a process driven by the Poisson measure. The authors invoke semi-martingale representations from Bank and Körber to express the portfolio value process, apply the martingale optimality principle in the enlarged filtration to derive an original BSDE with jumps, express the optimal value and an optimal strategy in terms of the BSDE solution, prove existence of a solution to this BSDE, and present numerical experiments quantifying the utility gain from incorporating jump-signal information.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work extends classical utility maximization results to a setting with non-predictable strategies that incorporate jump signals, providing an explicit BSDE characterization that links the optimum to a solvable equation and an existence proof that guarantees well-posedness under the stated assumptions. The numerical section supplies concrete evidence of the value of the additional information, which may inform applications involving event-driven trading signals.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Martingale optimality principle): the derivation of the BSDE (presumably Eq. (something) in the subsequent section) relies on the semi-martingale decomposition from Bank and Körber; it is not immediately clear whether the jump-signal information introduces additional integrability conditions that must be verified before the optimality principle applies directly. A short paragraph confirming that the enlarged filtration satisfies the usual conditions used in the cited reference would strengthen the argument.
  2. [§6] §6 (Existence proof): the existence argument for the BSDE with jumps is central to the main claim, yet the abstract and outline leave open whether standard Lipschitz or quadratic-growth conditions are verified or whether a fixed-point argument is used. Explicit statement of the precise assumptions on the driver (e.g., boundedness of the jump coefficient) and the space in which the solution is sought would make the proof load-bearing rather than formal.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] Notation for the Poisson random measure and its compensator should be introduced once and used consistently; the current description in the model section occasionally switches between N(dt,dz) and Ñ(dt,dz) without explicit reminder.
  2. [§7] The numerical experiments section would benefit from a brief description of the discretization scheme for the BSDE (e.g., number of time steps, Monte-Carlo paths) and a table reporting the utility values with and without jump signals for several parameter sets.
  3. [§3] Reference [1] (Bank and Körber) is cited for the semi-martingale representation; adding a one-sentence reminder of the precise theorem invoked would help readers who are not immediately familiar with that work.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Martingale optimality principle): the derivation of the BSDE (presumably Eq. (something) in the subsequent section) relies on the semi-martingale decomposition from Bank and Körber; it is not immediately clear whether the jump-signal information introduces additional integrability conditions that must be verified before the optimality principle applies directly. A short paragraph confirming that the enlarged filtration satisfies the usual conditions used in the cited reference would strengthen the argument.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit confirmation would improve readability. The enlarged filtration generated by the Brownian motion and the Poisson-driven jump-signal process is right-continuous and complete, hence satisfies the usual conditions required by Bank and Körber. Under our standing assumptions on admissible strategies (integrability with respect to the semimartingale decomposition), no additional integrability restrictions arise from the jump signals. In the revised manuscript we will insert a short paragraph in §4 stating these facts and confirming that the martingale optimality principle applies directly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§6] §6 (Existence proof): the existence argument for the BSDE with jumps is central to the main claim, yet the abstract and outline leave open whether standard Lipschitz or quadratic-growth conditions are verified or whether a fixed-point argument is used. Explicit statement of the precise assumptions on the driver (e.g., boundedness of the jump coefficient) and the space in which the solution is sought would make the proof load-bearing rather than formal.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point of clarity. The existence proof in §6 proceeds via a fixed-point argument on the space of square-integrable processes adapted to the enlarged filtration, under quadratic growth of the driver and a uniform bound on the jump coefficient. These conditions are verified in the proof but are not restated at the beginning of the section. In the revision we will add an explicit paragraph at the start of §6 listing the precise assumptions on the driver (including boundedness of the jump coefficient) and the precise solution space, thereby making the hypotheses and the fixed-point argument fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper invokes an external result from Bank and Körber to represent admissible portfolios as semimartingales in the enlarged filtration, then applies the martingale optimality principle to derive a new BSDE with jumps whose solution yields the optimal value and strategy; existence of a solution to this BSDE is proved separately. None of the load-bearing steps reduce the final claim to a fitted parameter, a self-referential definition, or a chain of self-citations; the cited representation theorem is independent, the BSDE is original, and the model assumptions (independent homogeneous Poisson measure, jump-signal information) are stated explicitly without presupposing the derived optimum.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard stochastic-process assumptions for the driving noises and on the admissibility of jump-signal strategies; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Poisson measure is independent of the Brownian motion and homogeneous.
    Explicitly stated when describing the risky asset dynamics.
  • domain assumption Admissible strategies may depend on the information generated by a process driven by the Poisson measure.
    Central modeling choice that distinguishes the problem from classical predictable strategies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5678 in / 1399 out tokens · 62340 ms · 2026-05-21T09:55:54.201512+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optimal Merton's Problem under Multivariate Affine Volterra Models with Jumps

    math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Optimal strategies for Merton's problem are derived in semi-closed form for multivariate affine Volterra models with jumps via martingale optimality and a new Riccati BSDEJ.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Merton’s optimal investment problem with jump signals.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 13(4):1302–1325, 2022

    Peter Bank and Laura Körber. Merton’s optimal investment problem with jump signals.SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 13(4):1302–1325, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    How much should we care about what others know? jump signals in optimal investment under relative performance concerns.arXiv:2503.16039v2, 2025

    Peter Bank and Gemma Sedrakjan. How much should we care about what others know? jump signals in optimal investment under relative performance concerns.arXiv:2503.16039v2, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Bounded solutions to backward sdes with jumps for utility optimization and indifference hedging.Ann

    Dirk Becherer. Bounded solutions to backward sdes with jumps for utility optimization and indifference hedging.Ann. Appl. Probab., 16(4):2027–2054, 2006

    work page 2027

  4. [4]

    Discrete-time approximation of decoupled forward–backward sde with jumps.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 118(1):53–75, 2008

    Bruno Bouchard and Romuald Elie. Discrete-time approximation of decoupled forward–backward sde with jumps.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 118(1):53–75, 2008

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Monte-carlo valorisation of american options: facts and new algorithms to improve existing methods.Springer Proceedings in Mathematics, 12

    Bruno Bouchard and Xavier Warin. Monte-carlo valorisation of american options: facts and new algorithms to improve existing methods.Springer Proceedings in Mathematics, 12

    work page

  6. [6]

    Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization.Ann

    Jaksa Cvitanic and Ioani Karatzas. Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization.Ann. Appl. Probab., 2:767–818, 1992

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    Quadratic Exponential Semimartingales and Application to BSDEs with jumps

    Nicole El Karoui, Anis Matoussi, and Armand Ngoupeyou. Quadratic Exponential Semimartingales and Application to BSDEs with jumps.arXiv:1603.06191v1, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Representation of martingales with jumps and applications to mathematical finance

    Kunita Hiroshi. Representation of martingales with jumps and applications to mathematical finance. Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics in Kyoto: In honour of Kiyosi Itô, 41:209–232, 2004

    work page 2004

  9. [9]

    Utility maximization in incomplete markets.Ann

    Ying Hu, Peter Imkeller, and Matthias Müller. Utility maximization in incomplete markets.Ann. Appl. Probab., 15(3):1691–1712, 2005

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    Springer, A Series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics, 2003

    Jean Jacod and Albert Shiryaev.Limit theorems for stochastic processes, volume 288. Springer, A Series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics, 2003

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    Backward stochastic differential equations and partial differential equations with quadratic growth.The annals of probability, 28(2):558–602, 2000

    Magdalena Kobylanski. Backward stochastic differential equations and partial differential equations with quadratic growth.The annals of probability, 28(2):558–602, 2000

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Springer-Verlag, 2013

    Delong Lukasz.Backward Stochastic Differenrtial Equations with Jumps and Their Actuarial and Financial Applications. Springer-Verlag, 2013

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Exponential quadratic bsdes with infinite activity jumps.preprint, 2020

    Anis Matoussi and Rym Salhi. Exponential quadratic bsdes with infinite activity jumps.preprint, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Robert C. Merton. Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case. Journal of Economic Theory, 3(4):373–413, 1971

    work page 1971

  15. [15]

    Robert C. Merton. Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model.The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51(3):373–413, 247-257

    work page

  16. [16]

    Utility maximization in a jump market model.Stochastics and Stochastics Reports, 80:1–27, 2008

    Marie-Amélie Morlais. Utility maximization in a jump market model.Stochastics and Stochastics Reports, 80:1–27, 2008. 37

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Quadratic bsdes driven by a continuous martingale and application to utility maximization problem.Finance and Stochastics, 13:121–150, 2009

    Marie-Amélie Morlais. Quadratic bsdes driven by a continuous martingale and application to utility maximization problem.Finance and Stochastics, 13:121–150, 2009

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Quadratic BSDEs with jumps: a fixed-point approach

    Dylan Possamai, Nabil Kazi-Tani, and Chao Zhou. Quadratic BSDEs with jumps: a fixed-point approach. Electron. J. Probab., 20:1–28, 2015

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Backward stochastic differential equations with jumps and related non-linear expectations

    Manuella Royer. Backward stochastic differential equations with jumps and related non-linear expectations. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 116(10):1358–1376, 2006. 38

    work page 2006