pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11319 · v3 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🧮 math.AG

NCCRs of cones over del Pezzo surfaces

Anya Nordskova , Michel Van den Bergh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG
keywords noncommutative crepant resolutiondel Pezzo surfacegeometric helixmutationexceptional collectioncone singularityGorenstein singularity
0
0 comments X

The pith

All NCCRs of anticanonical cones over del Pezzo surfaces arise from geometric helices on the surface and connect via mutations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors classify noncommutative crepant resolutions of anticanonical cones over del Pezzo surfaces by showing each one comes from a geometric helix on the surface. They further show that these helices are all linked to one another through mutations, after allowing for tensoring by line bundles and shifts. This result provides a noncommutative analogue to the connectivity of crepant resolutions for this class of canonical singularities, which are not terminal. It relies on associating polygons to exceptional collections on the del Pezzo surface. A reader might care because it gives an algebraic method to relate different resolutions without leaving the noncommutative setting.

Core claim

Every NCCR of an anticanonical del Pezzo cone arises from a geometric helix on the corresponding del Pezzo surface. All such geometric helices are connected to each other by mutations, up to simple operations which include tensoring by line bundles and shifts. The classification and connectivity are established using polygons associated to exceptional collections on del Pezzo surfaces.

What carries the argument

The geometric helix on the del Pezzo surface, which parametrizes the NCCRs through exceptional collections and their polygons.

If this is right

  • Every NCCR arises from some geometric helix on the del Pezzo surface.
  • Mutations connect the NCCRs corresponding to different helices after tensoring by line bundles and shifting.
  • The problem of classifying NCCRs reduces to classifying geometric helices up to these operations.
  • Polygons from exceptional collections on del Pezzo surfaces play a key role in proving the connections.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar classifications might hold for other types of canonical singularities using analogous geometric objects.
  • This could allow explicit computation of mutation graphs for specific del Pezzo surfaces.
  • The observations on polygons may help in studying exceptional collections more broadly.

Load-bearing premise

That the polygons associated to exceptional collections suffice to classify and connect all NCCRs without additional hidden assumptions on the del Pezzo surface or the cone singularity.

What would settle it

Discovering an NCCR of such a cone singularity that does not correspond to any geometric helix, or finding two helices where the associated NCCRs cannot be transformed into each other by mutations combined with tensoring by line bundles and shifts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11319 by Anya Nordskova, Michel Van den Bergh.

Figure 9.1
Figure 9.1. Figure 9.1: Geometric interpretation of ˜σi`1 on the level of tli,i`1u n´1 0 Ei´1 Ei Ei`1 Ei`2 t ℓ 1 i,i`1 o ℓi,i`1 ℓi`1,i`2 ℓi´1,i ℓi´2,i´1 For u, v P L such that ωpu, vq ‰ 0 let Auv be the unique affine transformation (shear mapping) of R 2 such that (1) Auvpuq “ v. (2) Auv is the identity on the line through the origin parallel to ru, vs. Explicitly, Auv is given by (9.3) Auvpxq “ x ` ωpx, v ´ uq ωpu, v ´ uq pv ´… view at source ↗
Figure 9.2
Figure 9.2. Figure 9.2: The green polygon pl 1 0,1 , . . . , l1 j´1,j , lj,j`1, . . . , ln´1,0q is obtained from the blue polygon pl0,1, . . . , ln´1,0q by the generalised right mutation at m0 with respect to lj,j`1. Here this is also the quiver mutation at m0. o l0,1 l1,2 ln´1,0 lj,j`1 lj`1,j`2 l 1 0,1 l 1 j´1,j 9.2. Reduction of ranks and area change. As before, let E “ pE0, . . . , En´1q be a very strong exceptional collecti… view at source ↗
Figure 9.3
Figure 9.3. Figure 9.3: P0 P1 T o l0,1 ln´1,0 lj,j`1 lj`1,j`2 l 1 0,1 l 1 j´1,j P0 T 1 P 1 1 o l0,1 ln´1,0 lj,j`1 lj`1,j`2 l 1 0,1 l 1 j´1,j [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_9_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9.4
Figure 9.4. Figure 9.4: l2,0 l1,2 l0,1 l3,0 l0,1 l1,2 l2,3 E is the underlying exceptional collection of a block exceptional collection without broken blocks, which we denote by the same symbol. E “ ppE p0q 0 , . . . , Epα0´1q 0 q, . . . ,pE p0q k´1 , . . . , Epαk´1´1q k´1 qq We will discuss some restrictions on the shape of the quiver Q and the polygon P associated to E. Recall that the shape of P was described in Lemma 8.13. … view at source ↗
Figure 10.1
Figure 10.1. Figure 10.1: a b c d e f Proof. If pE, Fq is an exceptional pair then χ ´pE, Fq “ χpE, Fq. □ Corollary 10.7. Assume that E “ pE0, . . . , En´1q is a very strong exceptional col￾lection on X. Let c be the incidence matrix of the corresponding quiver Q, i.e. cij “ |Qpi, jq| if there are arrows i Ñ j and cij “ ´|Qpj, iq| if there are arrows j Ñ i. Then for all 4-tuples of vertices pi0, i1, i2, i3q of Q we have (10.3) c… view at source ↗
Figure 10.2
Figure 10.2. Figure 10.2: Reduced quivers for 5 blocks. mutations, every very strong exceptional collection can be reduced to a block com￾plete very strong exceptional collection whose total rank cannot be further reduced by block quiver mutations. Section §12 gives a complete list of the Gram matrices of such collections, up to rotation. This list if obtained in §13. Hence it remains to show that all the very strong exceptional… view at source ↗
Figure 13.1
Figure 13.1. Figure 13.1: mi mi`1 mi`2 o li´1,i li,i`1 li`1,i`2 li`2,i`3 p0, 2q p0, 1q p1, 0q p1, 1q p2, 0q [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_13_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.2
Figure 13.2. Figure 13.2: mj mj´1 mi`1 mi F lj,j`1 lj´1,j li,i`1 li´1,i 13.2, where the origin is in the region marked F bounded by two light blue lines, respectively parallel to mi and mj . We claim first that for i ď u ă v ď j we have (13.9) ωpmu, mvq 2 ωplu´1,u, lu,u`1qωplv´1,v, lv,v`1q ă 4. We may make an affine coordinate change so that mu “ p0, ´1q and mv “ p0, 1q. Then the picture becomes as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
Figure 13.3
Figure 13.3. Figure 13.3: mu Fr mv p0, b ` 1q p0, bq pa, 0q pa ` 1, 0q Scaling ω such that ωpmu, mvq “ 1 we then obtain (13.11) ωpmu, mvq 2 ωplu´1,u, lu,u`1qωplu´1,u, lu,u`1q ď 1 pa ` 1q{2 ¨ pb ` 1q{2 “ 4 pa ` 1qpb ` 1q ď 4. Let us now analyse when we have equality. By (13.11) this implies a “ b “ 0, i.e. v “ u ` 1. Inspecting how we obtain the first inequality in (13.11) we see the inequalities in (13.10) must also be equalitie… view at source ↗
Figure 13.4
Figure 13.4. Figure 13.4: m1 m2 m3 p0, α2r2 ` α1r1q p0, α2r2q pα2r2, 0q pα2r2 ` α3r3, 0q o “ px, yq The only solution for this is (after choosing suitable coordinates for LZ) m˜ 1 “ p0, ´1q m˜ 2 “ p1, ´1q m˜ 3 “ p1, 0q So the situation is as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p064_13_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.5
Figure 13.5. Figure 13.5: c d a b o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_13_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.6
Figure 13.6. Figure 13.6: ap0, 1q bp0, 0q cp1, 0q opx, yq o 1 p2x, 2yq dpu, vq Note that the non-admissible vertex is unique and its existence implies that P has no parallel edges. Lemma 13.8. The assumption that the origin is in the forbidden region is equivalent to the following conditions: ∆poabq ∆pabcq ď 1 2 ∆pobcq ∆pabcq ď 1 2 ∆podaq ∆pabdq ď 1 2 ∆pocdq ∆pbcdq ď 1 2 Lemma 13.9. We have the following inequalities ∆pcdaq ∆pod… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: , where the line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p067_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.6
Figure 13.6. Figure 13.6: Then (13.25) is equivalent to fpx, yq :“ p2x ` 2y ´ 1q 2 ´ uxy ě 0 We have to prove that this implies xy ě u{16 under the conditions 0 ă x ď 1{2, 0 ă y ď 1{2, 2x ` 2y ´ 1 ě 0, which express that o is in the red triangle in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_13_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.8
Figure 13.8. Figure 13.8: In blue we have drawn an implicit plot of the curve C and we have indicated the sign of f on the complement of this curve. We are only interested in the region f ě 0 to the right of the black line. We have to understand the curves of the form xy “ λ which intersect this region. As the picture shows, this happens for λ ě u{16 which gives what we want. □ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p068_13_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.8
Figure 13.8. Figure 13.8: 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 f ă 0 f ą 0 f ą 0 xy “ u{16 Lemma 13.11. We have (13.26) 2 ď ∆pbcdq ∆pocdq ď 1 1 2 ´ 2 ∆pobcq ∆poabq ∆pabcq 2 Proof. Consider the following picture in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_13_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.9
Figure 13.9. Figure 13.9: c d a b o o 1 o 2 We find ∆pbcdq ∆pocdq “ |cb| |co1 | ď |cb| |co2 | We first prove the upper bound in (13.26). Put (13.27) v “ ∆pabcq 2 ∆pobcq ∆poabq [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p069_13_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.10
Figure 13.10. Figure 13.10: ap0, 1q bp0, 0q cp1, 0q xy “ 1 v ˆ 1 2 , 2 v ˙ o 2 ˆ 1 2 ` 2 v , 0 ˙ We need to find an upper bound for |cb|{|co2 | in terms of v. To this end we choose the coordinates as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p070_13_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.11
Figure 13.11. Figure 13.11: l0,1 l1,2 l2,3 l3,0 E0 E1 E2 E3 o We will frequently use the geometric results from §13.4. To apply them in our current situation we observe that by (13.7) applied for pi, jq “ pi, i ` 1q we have (13.29) χ 2 i,i`1αiαi`1 “ ∆pabcq 2 ∆poabq ∆pobcq with notations as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_13_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.12
Figure 13.12. Figure 13.12: o c b a Ei`1 αi`1 Ei αi Lemma 13.10 combined with (13.29) yields χ 2 12α1α2 ď 4 χ 2 30α3α0 ě 4(13.30) χ 2 30χ 2 12α0α1α2α3 ď 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p071_13_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.11
Figure 13.11. Figure 13.11: From (13.2) and (13.5) we obtain (13.31) S01 α0α1r 2 0 r 2 1 ` S12 α1α2r 2 1 r 2 2 ` S23 α2α3r 2 2 r 2 3 ` S30 α3α0r 2 3 r 2 0 “ K2 X Combining Theorem 8.9(3) with Lemma 13.8 we see that the assumption that the origin is in the forbidden region is equivalent to S30 α0r 2 0 ě 2 S30 α3r 2 3 ě 2(13.32) S23 α2r 2 2 ě 2 S01 α1r 2 1 ě 2(13.33) or, rewritten using (13.6), r0 r3 ď χ30α3 2 r3 r0 ď χ30α0 2 (13.3… view at source ↗
Figure 13.13
Figure 13.13. Figure 13.13: m1 m2 m3 m4 m0 p´1, 1q p´1, 0q p0, ´1q p1, ´1q o p0, 0q px, yq and S01 “ x ` 1 S12 “ 1 S23 “ 1 s34 “ y ` 1 S40 “ 2px ` yq Specialising (13.2) to the current setting and combining it with (13.4)(13.5) yields: (13.47) S01 R0R1 ` S12 R1R2 ` S23 R2R3 ` S34 R3R4 ` S40 R4R0 “ K2 X. Substituting what we know yields x ` 1 x ` y ` 1 1 ` 1 1 ` y ` 1 x ` y ` 2px ` yq px ` yq 2 “ K2 X, which is equivalent to (13.4… view at source ↗
Figure 13.14
Figure 13.14. Figure 13.14: l4,0 l3,4 l2,3 l1,2 m0 l0,1 m1 m3 m2 m4 o 13.6.2. Case 2. Here we assume that the P is like on the right of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_13_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13.15
Figure 13.15. Figure 13.15: However this case cannot not occur since according to Lemma 13.6 the origin should be in the purple dot, which is not in the forbidden region. References [1] Arnaud Beauville, Determinantal hypersurfaces, vol. 48, 2000, Dedicated to William Fulton on the occasion of his 60th birthday, pp. 39–64. [2] Raf Bocklandt, Graded Calabi Yau algebras of dimension 3 (with an appendix by Michel Van den Bergh), J. … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Non-commutative crepant resolutions (NCCRs) are non-commutative versions of classical crepant resolutions in algebraic geometry. For 3-dimensional terminal Gorenstein singularities Iyama and Wemyss proved that all NCCRs are connected by mutations, which may be viewed as a non-commutative analogue of Kawamata's result that all crepant resolutions are connected by flops. In this paper we prove the corresponding result for a class of canonical Gorenstein singularities which are not terminal, namely anticanonical cones over del Pezzo surfaces. More precisely, we first obtain a classification of NCCRs of anticanonical del Pezzo cones, showing that every NCCR arises from a geometric helix on the corresponding del Pezzo surface. We then prove that all such geometric helices are connected to each other by mutations, up to simple operations which include tensoring by line bundles and shifts. A crucial ingredient in our proofs is the polygons that can be associated to exceptional collections on del Pezzo surfaces following the works of Hille and Perling. We obtain some interesting observations about these polygons which may be of independent interest.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper classifies NCCRs of anticanonical cones over del Pezzo surfaces by establishing a correspondence with geometric helices on the surface, using polygons associated to exceptional collections following Hille-Perling. It then proves that all such helices are connected by mutations, up to tensoring by line bundles and shifts. This extends the Iyama-Wemyss connectivity theorem from terminal Gorenstein 3-fold singularities to this class of canonical singularities.

Significance. If the classification and connectivity results hold, the work is significant for providing a combinatorial model of NCCRs via Hille-Perling polygons and establishing mutation connectivity in a non-terminal setting. The observations on the polygons may be of independent interest for the theory of exceptional collections on del Pezzo surfaces. The approach is internally consistent and builds on standard mutation theory and external polygon constructions without introducing free parameters or circular reductions.

minor comments (3)
  1. Clarify in the introduction or §1 the precise list of 'simple operations' (beyond tensoring by line bundles and shifts) under which the helices are considered connected, as this is central to the connectivity statement.
  2. In the section discussing the polygons (likely §3 or §4), explicitly state whether the observations about these polygons are new or follow directly from Hille-Perling, to highlight any independent contributions.
  3. Ensure that the statement of the main classification theorem includes a clear reference to the precise del Pezzo degree or Picard rank assumptions under which the helix-NCCR bijection holds, even if they are general.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our manuscript and for highlighting its significance in classifying NCCRs for anticanonical del Pezzo cones and extending mutation connectivity results beyond the terminal case. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no point-by-point revisions to address at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by classifying NCCRs via a direct correspondence to geometric helices on del Pezzo surfaces (using external Hille-Perling polygons as combinatorial model for exceptional collections) and then showing mutation-connectivity within that set up to tensoring and shifts. This extends the cited Iyama-Wemyss result for terminal singularities without any reduction of the central claims to self-defined quantities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The polygons and mutation operations serve as independent inputs, and the abstract indicates the proofs are direct rather than conditional on unverified internal assumptions. No quoted step exhibits the specific reduction required to flag circularity under the enumerated patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper rests on standard domain assumptions from algebraic geometry about del Pezzo surfaces, exceptional collections, and derived categories; no free parameters or invented entities introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existence and properties of geometric helices on del Pezzo surfaces corresponding to NCCRs
    Central to the classification claim in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Polygons associated to exceptional collections on del Pezzo surfaces (Hille-Perling) capture mutation relations
    Stated as crucial ingredient for proofs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5490 in / 1405 out tokens · 51509 ms · 2026-05-10T16:22:09.223615+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometric helices on del Pezzo surfaces from tilting

    math.AG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    All geometric helices on del Pezzo surfaces are related by elementary operations including tilting, implying that non-commutative crepant resolutions of their affine cones are related by mutations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    48, 2000, Dedicated to William Fulton on the occasion of his 60th birthday, pp

    Arnaud Beauville,Determinantal hypersurfaces, vol. 48, 2000, Dedicated to William Fulton on the occasion of his 60th birthday, pp. 39–64

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Pure Appl

    Raf Bocklandt,Graded Calabi Yau algebras of dimension 3 (with an appendix by Michel Van den Bergh), J. Pure Appl. Algebra212(2008), no. 1, 14–32. 11Recall that according to Proposition 5.10 relations in the quiver corresponding toEcorrespond to reverse arrows inQ. NCCRS OF CONES OVER DEL PEZZO SURF ACES 81

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Alexey Bondal,Representations of associative algebras and coherent sheaves, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.53(1989), no. 1, 25–44

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    ,A symplectic groupoid of triangular bilinear forms and the braid group, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat.68(2004), no. 4, 19–74. MR 2084561

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Alexey Bondal and Dmitri Orlov,Semiorthogonal decomposition for algebraic varieties, 1995

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    Alexey Bondal and Alexander Polishchuk,Homological properties of associative algebras: the method of helices, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat.57(1993), no. 2, 3–50

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    Alexey Bondal and Michel Van den Bergh,Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry, Mosc. Math. J.3(2003), no. 1, 1–36, 258

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Pierrick Bousseau,Geometric helices on del Pezzo surfaces from tilting, 2026

    work page 2026

  9. [9]

    Algebra289(2005), no

    Tom Bridgeland,t-structures on some local Calabi-Yau varieties, J. Algebra289(2005), no. 2, 453–483

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    Math.224(2010), no

    Tom Bridgeland and David Stern,Helices on del Pezzo surfaces and tilting Calabi-Yau alge- bras, Adv. Math.224(2010), no. 4, 1672–1716

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Louis de Thanhoffer de V¨ olcsey and Michel Van den Bergh,Some new examples of nondegen- erate quiver potentials, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2013), no. 20, 4672–4686

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    ,On an analogue of the Markov equation for exceptional collections of length 4, 2016

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Harm Derksen, Jerzy Weyman, and Andrei Zelevinsky,Quivers with potentials and their representations. I. Mutations, Selecta Math. (N.S.)14(2008), no. 1, 59–119

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    150, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1995, With a view toward algebraic geometry

    David Eisenbud,Commutative algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1995, With a view toward algebraic geometry

    work page 1995

  15. [15]

    A. L. Gorodentsev,Exceptional bundles on surfaces with a moving anticanonical class, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.52(1988), no. 4, 740–757, 895

    work page 1988

  16. [16]

    Herzog,Seiberg duality is an exceptional mutation, Journal of High Energy Physics08(2004), no

    Christopher P. Herzog,Seiberg duality is an exceptional mutation, Journal of High Energy Physics08(2004), no. 064, 1–30

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Math.147(2011), no

    Lutz Hille and Markus Perling,Exceptional sequences of invertible sheaves on rational surfaces, Compos. Math.147(2011), no. 4, 1230–1280

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Huybrechts,Fourier-Mukai transforms in algebraic geometry, Oxford Mathematical Mono- graphs, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    D. Huybrechts,Fourier-Mukai transforms in algebraic geometry, Oxford Mathematical Mono- graphs, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Osamu Iyama and Idun Reiten,Fomin-Zelevinsky mutation and tilting modules over Calabi- Yau algebras, Amer. J. Math.130(2008), no. 4, 1087–1149

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Math.197(2014), no

    Osamu Iyama and Michael Wemyss,Maximal modifications and Auslander-Reiten duality for non-isolated singularities, Invent. Math.197(2014), no. 3, 521–586

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Math.261(2014), 85–121

    ,Singular derived categories ofQ-factorial terminalizations and maximal modification algebras, Adv. Math.261(2014), 85–121

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    ,Tits cones intersections and applications, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    B. V. Karpov and D. Yu. Nogin,Three-block exceptional sets on del Pezzo surfaces, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat.62(1998), no. 3, 3–38

    work page 1998

  24. [24]

    Sigma5(2017)

    Alexander Kasprzyk, Benjamin Nill, and Thomas Prince,Minimality and mutation- equivalence of polygons, Forum Math. Sigma5(2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Yujiro Kawamata,Flops connect minimal models, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.44(2008), no. 2, 419–423. MR 2426353

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Reine Angew

    Bernhard Keller,Deformed Calabi-Yau completions, J. Reine Angew. Math.654(2011), 125– 180

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Math.147(2011), no

    Bernhard Keller, Daniel Murfet, and Michel Van den Bergh,On two examples by Iyama and Yoshino, Compos. Math.147(2011), no. 2, 591–612. 82 ANYA NORDSKOV A AND MICHEL V AN DEN BERGH

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Math.226(2011), no

    Bernhard Keller and Dong Yang,Derived equivalences from mutations of quivers with poten- tial, Adv. Math.226(2011), no. 3, 2118–2168

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Z.307 (2024), no

    Johannes Krah,Mutations of numerically exceptional collections on surfaces, Math. Z.307 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 78, 28

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    S. A. Kuleshov and D. O. Orlov,Exceptional sheaves on Del Pezzo surfaces, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat.58(1994), no. 3, 53–87

    work page 1994

  31. [31]

    A. G. Kuznetsov,Exceptional collections in surface-like categories, Mat. Sb.208(2017), no. 9, 116–147

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Seraphina Eun Bi Lee, Tudur Lewis, and Sidhanth Rama,Cyclic Nielsen realization for del Pezzo surfaces, arXiv e-prints (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    Methods Appl.20(2024), Paper No

    Wendelin Lutz,Mirrors to del Pezzo surfaces and the classification ofT-polygons, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl.20(2024), Paper No. 095, 20

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Manin,Cubic forms, second ed., North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol

    Yu.˜I. Manin,Cubic forms, second ed., North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 4, North- Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1986, Algebra, geometry, arithmetic, Translated from the Russian by M. Hazewinkel

    work page 1986

  35. [35]

    (N.S.)30(2024), no

    Yuma Mizuno,q-Painlev´ e equations on cluster Poisson varieties via toric geometry, Selecta Math. (N.S.)30(2024), no. 2, Paper No. 19, 37

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Anya Nordskova and Michel Van den Bergh,Full exceptional collections on Fano threefolds and groups generated by spherical twists on K3 surfaces, 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    NCCRs of cones over del Pezzo surfaces

    ,SageMath scripts for the paper “NCCRs of cones over del Pezzo surfaces”,https: //github.com/cantate-be/mutations2026

    work page

  38. [38]

    Z.288(2018), no

    Markus Perling,Combinatorial aspects of exceptional sequences on (rational) surfaces, Math. Z.288(2018), no. 1-2, 243–286

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Alexander Polishchuk and Michel Van den Bergh,Semiorthogonal decompositions of the cate- gories of equivariant coherent sheaves for some reflection groups, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 21(2019), no. 9, 2653–2749

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    A. N. Rudakov,Markov numbers and exceptional bundles onP 2, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.52(1988), no. 1, 100–112, 240

    work page 1988

  41. [41]

    ˇSpela ˇSpenko and Michel Van den Bergh,Non-commutative crepant resolutions for some toric singularities. II, J. Noncommut. Geom.14(2020), no. 1, 73–103

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    The Sage Developers,SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System, 2026, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6259615

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.6259615 2026

  43. [43]

    Michel Van den Bergh,Non-commutative crepant resolutions, The legacy of Niels Henrik Abel, Springer, Berlin, 2004, pp. 749–770

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    (N.S.)21(2015), no

    ,Calabi-Yau algebras and superpotentials, Selecta Math. (N.S.)21(2015), no. 2, 555– 603

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    ,Noncommutative crepant resolutions, an overview, ICM—International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. 2. Plenary lectures, EMS Press, Berlin, [2023]©2023, pp. 1354–1391

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Michael Wemyss,A lockdown survey on cDV singularities, McKay correspondence, mutation and related topics, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 88, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, [2023]©2023, pp. 47–93. Email address:anya.nordskova@ipmu.jp Email address:michel.vandenbergh@uhasselt.be NCCRS OF CONES OVER DEL PEZZO SURF ACES 83 (Michel Van den Bergh)V akgroep Wiskunde en D...

    work page 2023