pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14289 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.supr-con· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Quantum Charge-4e Superconductivity and Deconfined Pseudocriticality in the Attractive SU(4) Hubbard Model

Zhou-Quan Wan , Huan Jiang , Xuan Zou , Shiwei Zhang , Shao-Kai Jian
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.supr-conhep-th
keywords charge-4e superconductivitySU(4) Hubbard modelquantum Monte Carlodeconfined pseudocriticalitygauge-Higgs theoryquartet condensationfractionalized superconductivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The attractive SU(4) Hubbard model supports a stable charge-4e superconducting phase at zero temperature reached by suppressing charge-2e pairing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the zero-temperature phases of the attractive SU(4) Hubbard model with large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Stronger interactions suppress charge-2e correlations until they vanish, while charge-4e correlations remain robust and grow with system size, indicating long-range quartet order. Single electrons stay gapped across the transition, and charge-2e scaling deviates from conventional expectations. The authors account for these features with a fractionalized description in which the charge-2e order parameter is composite and coupled to an emergent gauge structure. An Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory realizes the transition as deconfined quantum pseudocriticality arising from a fixed-point collision, with its one-loop exponents matching the simulation data.

Core claim

In the attractive SU(4) Hubbard model, quantum Monte Carlo simulations identify a charge-2e superconducting phase at weaker interactions that gives way to a charge-4e superconducting phase at stronger interactions. Charge-4e correlations converge with system size while charge-2e correlations are suppressed to zero, and single-particle excitations remain gapped throughout. The transition exhibits charge-2e scaling that cannot be described by conventional Landau theory. These observations are explained by an Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory in which the charge-2e order parameter is a composite operator coupled to an emergent non-Abelian gauge field; the theory produces deconfined quantum pseudocentral

What carries the argument

The Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory, which treats the physical charge-2e order parameter as a composite field coupled to an emergent non-Abelian gauge structure and realizes deconfined quantum pseudocriticality via a fixed-point collision between the Higgs and confined phases.

If this is right

  • Charge-4e superconductivity is realized as a bona fide zero-temperature phase with long-range quartet order.
  • The charge-2e to charge-4e transition proceeds through deconfined pseudocriticality rather than a conventional Landau critical point.
  • One-loop exponents computed from the Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory quantitatively match the quantum Monte Carlo scaling.
  • The model provides a controlled, numerically exact platform for studying quartet condensation and related fractionalized superconducting states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar composite-order mechanisms may stabilize charge-4e phases in other multi-flavor attractive Hubbard models or in doped systems with approximate SU(4) symmetry.
  • Dynamical probes such as the single-particle spectral function or current-current correlations could reveal signatures of the emergent gauge structure that differ from Landau-Ginzburg predictions.
  • Finite-temperature extensions of the same model may host a pseudocritical regime whose width is controlled by the fixed-point collision distance.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum Monte Carlo simulations have fully overcome the fermion sign problem and finite-size effects sufficiently to distinguish charge-2e from charge-4e channels and to establish that the observed scaling is not a finite-size artifact.

What would settle it

Numerical data at substantially larger system sizes showing that charge-2e correlations continue to decay or that the extracted scaling exponents deviate systematically from the one-loop collision-point values predicted by the Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14289 by Huan Jiang, Shao-Kai Jian, Shiwei Zhang, Xuan Zou, Zhou-Quan Wan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the attractive SU(4) Hubbard model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Finite-size scaling collapse of the charge-2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fixed points collision near [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Correlation ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a,b) Benchmark of the bridge link method for a 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. One-loop Feynman diagrams for the self-energy of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Single-particle gap across the phase transition. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. One-loop Feynman diagrams for the correction to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. One-loop Feynman diagrams for the correction to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Unlike conventional charge-2e superconductors, a charge-4e superconductor exhibits long-range coherence of electron quartets rather than Cooper pairs. Clear zero-temperature realizations of charge-4e superconductivity remain rare. Here, we investigate the zero-temperature phase diagram of the attractive SU(4) Hubbard model with numerically exact, large-scale quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations overcoming major technical hurdles. We identify both charge-2e and charge-4e superconducting phases. Upon increasing interaction, charge-2e correlations are suppressed and eventually vanish, while the charge-4e correlations remain robust and converge with system size, signaling the onset of a quartet-condensed phase. Interestingly, across the charge-2e--charge-4e transition, single electrons remain gapped, while charge-2e correlations exhibit a scaling behavior inconsistent with a conventional Landau description. These features are naturally captured by a fractionalized framework in which the physical charge-2e order parameter is a composite field coupled to an emergent non-Abelian gauge structure. We formulate an Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory that realizes deconfined quantum pseudocriticality between the Higgs (charge-2e) phase and the confined (charge-4e) phase. The Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory yields pseudocriticality through a fixed-point collision, and its one-loop collision-point exponents quantitatively track the QMC results. Our results establish charge-4e superconductivity as a bona fide zero-temperature phase, provide a simple model for future studies in a numerically exact framework, and reveal an unconventional route to superconducting criticality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports large-scale QMC simulations of the attractive SU(4) Hubbard model that identify a charge-2e superconducting phase at weak coupling and a charge-4e phase at strong coupling. Charge-2e correlations are suppressed and vanish with increasing interaction while charge-4e correlations remain robust and converge with system size; single-particle excitations stay gapped across the transition, whose scaling deviates from Landau theory. These features are interpreted via an emergent Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory that realizes deconfined quantum pseudocriticality through a fixed-point collision, with one-loop exponents stated to track the QMC data.

Significance. If the numerical evidence is robust, the work would establish a simple, numerically exact lattice model for stable zero-temperature charge-4e superconductivity and provide a concrete example of deconfined pseudocriticality arising from non-Abelian gauge structure, with potential implications for fractionalized superconducting criticality.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and numerical results] Abstract and numerical-results section: the central claim that charge-4e correlations 'converge with system size' while charge-2e correlations 'vanish' (signaling true LRO and the quartet phase) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit values for maximum linear sizes L_max, extrapolation protocols to the thermodynamic limit, or quantitative error bars on the susceptibilities or correlation lengths in either channel. Without these, it is impossible to rule out finite-size saturation or channel-dependent sign-problem artifacts as the origin of the reported distinction.
  2. [Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory] Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory section: the effective theory is constructed specifically to reproduce the QMC-observed gapped electrons and anomalous scaling. The statement that the one-loop collision-point exponents 'quantitatively track' the QMC results therefore risks circularity; a direct, tabulated comparison of the numerical exponent values from both the simulation and the one-loop calculation is required to substantiate the claim of quantitative agreement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The definition of the charge-4e order parameter and its relation to the composite charge-2e field could be stated more explicitly with an equation in the introduction or theory section.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text should consistently report the precise system sizes and statistical errors used for each data point to allow readers to assess convergence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details and clarifications, which will strengthen the presentation of our numerical results and the comparison with the effective theory.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and numerical results] Abstract and numerical-results section: the central claim that charge-4e correlations 'converge with system size' while charge-2e correlations 'vanish' (signaling true LRO and the quartet phase) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit values for maximum linear sizes L_max, extrapolation protocols to the thermodynamic limit, or quantitative error bars on the susceptibilities or correlation lengths in either channel. Without these, it is impossible to rule out finite-size saturation or channel-dependent sign-problem artifacts as the origin of the reported distinction.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of these technical details is necessary to fully substantiate the central claims. In the revised manuscript, we will add to the numerical-results section the maximum linear sizes L_max used in the QMC simulations, the specific finite-size extrapolation protocols applied to the susceptibilities and correlation lengths (including functional forms and fitting ranges), and quantitative error bars on all reported quantities. These additions will allow readers to directly assess the convergence behavior and rule out finite-size saturation or sign-problem artifacts as alternative explanations for the observed distinction between channels. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory] Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory section: the effective theory is constructed specifically to reproduce the QMC-observed gapped electrons and anomalous scaling. The statement that the one-loop collision-point exponents 'quantitatively track' the QMC results therefore risks circularity; a direct, tabulated comparison of the numerical exponent values from both the simulation and the one-loop calculation is required to substantiate the claim of quantitative agreement.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern about potential circularity. Although the Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory was motivated by the gapped single-particle spectrum and the anomalous scaling observed in QMC, the one-loop exponents are computed independently from the effective field theory. To eliminate any ambiguity, we will add a direct tabulated comparison in the Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory section that lists the one-loop collision-point exponents alongside the corresponding numerical values extracted from the QMC simulations, together with a brief description of how the numerical exponents were obtained. This will provide a transparent, side-by-side assessment of the quantitative agreement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's primary evidence derives from independent large-scale QMC simulations of the attractive SU(4) Hubbard model, which directly compute correlation functions and scaling behaviors for charge-2e and charge-4e channels. These numerical results stand on their own as first-principles data from the microscopic Hamiltonian. The subsequent formulation of an Sp(4) gauge-Higgs theory is introduced as an effective description that accounts for the observed gapped electrons and non-Landau scaling; its one-loop fixed-point collision calculation then provides exponents that are compared to the QMC data as a consistency check. No quoted step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation whose content is unverified. The chain remains self-contained against external numerical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the numerical validity of the QMC data for both pairing channels and on the applicability of the emergent Sp(4) gauge structure to the observed transition; no explicit free parameters beyond the model's interaction strength are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The attractive SU(4) Hubbard model admits sign-problem-free QMC simulations at zero temperature
    Required for the claim of 'numerically exact' results after 'overcoming major technical hurdles'
  • domain assumption Charge-2e correlation scaling is inconsistent with conventional Landau theory
    Stated as an observed feature that motivates the fractionalized framework
invented entities (1)
  • Emergent non-Abelian Sp(4) gauge structure no independent evidence
    purpose: To fractionalize the physical charge-2e order parameter and produce deconfined pseudocriticality via fixed-point collision
    Formulated in the paper to explain the gapped single-electron spectrum and anomalous scaling seen in QMC

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5626 in / 1734 out tokens · 69866 ms · 2026-05-10T12:04:44.889911+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Demonstration of a fermion Quadrupling Condensate via Quantum Monte Carlo Simulation

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations provide direct microscopic evidence for a fermion-quadrupling condensate with transition temperature on the scale of the hopping energy.

  2. Gauging in superconductors and other electronic systems

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Superconductors are bosonic at low energy yet carry a gravito-magnetic anomaly from fermion parity gauging that forbids trivial massive phases in 3D and 4D.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P. Schlottmann, Ground-state and elemental excitations of the one-dimensional multicomponent fermi gas with delta -function interaction, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter6, 1359 (1994)

    1994

  2. [2]

    Babaev, A

    E. Babaev, A. Sudbø, and N. W. Ashcroft, A superconductor-to-superfluid phase transition in liquid metallic hydrogen, Nature431, 666 (2004)

    2004

  3. [3]

    Wu, Competing orders in one-dimensional spin-3/2 fermionic systems, Phys

    C. Wu, Competing orders in one-dimensional spin-3/2 fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 266404 (2005)

    2005

  4. [4]

    Capponi, G

    S. Capponi, G. Roux, P. Lecheminant, P. Azaria, E. Boulat, and S. R. White, Molecular superfluid phase in systems of one-dimensional multicomponent fermionic 6 cold atoms, Phys. Rev. A77, 013624 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Charge-4e superconductivity from pair-density-wave order in cer- tain high-temperature superconductors, Nature Physics 5, 830 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    Radzihovsky, Fluctuations and phase transitions in Larkin-Ovchinnikov liquid-crystal states of a population- imbalanced resonant Fermi gas, Phys

    L. Radzihovsky, Fluctuations and phase transitions in Larkin-Ovchinnikov liquid-crystal states of a population- imbalanced resonant Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A84, 023611 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    E. V. Herland, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø, Phase transi- tions in a three dimensionalU(1)×U(1) lattice London superconductor: Metallic superfluid and charge-4esuper- conducting states, Physical Review B82, 134511 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    R. M. Fernandes and L. Fu, Charge-4esuperconductivity from multicomponent nematic pairing: Application to twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review Letters127, 047001 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    S.-K. Jian, Y. Huang, and H. Yao, Charge-4esupercon- ductivity from nematic superconductors in two and three dimensions, Physical Review Letters127, 227001 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Hecker, R

    M. Hecker, R. Willa, J. Schmalian, and R. M. Fernandes, Cascade of vestigial orders in two-component supercon- ductors: Nematic, ferromagnetic,s-wave charge-4e, and d-wave charge-4estates, Physical Review B107, 224503 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Hecker and R

    M. Hecker and R. M. Fernandes, Local condensation of charge-4esuperconductivity at a nematic domain wall, Physical Review B109, 134514 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    G. E. Volovik, Fermionic Quartet and Vestigial Gravity, JETP Letters119, 330 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Zou, Z.-Q

    X. Zou, Z.-Q. Wan, and H. Yao, Emergence of charge- 4esuperconductivity from 2d nematic superconductors (2025), arXiv:2510.26720 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Zhou and Z

    S. Zhou and Z. Wang, Chern Fermi pocket, topological pair density wave, and charge-4eand charge-6esupercon- ductivity in kagom´ e superconductors, Nature Communi- cations13, 7288 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Maccari, J

    I. Maccari, J. Carlstr¨ om, and E. Babaev, Prediction of time-reversal-symmetry breaking fermionic quadrupling condensate in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B107, 064501 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Y.-B. Liu, J. Zhou, C. Wu, and F. Yang, Charge 4esuper- conductivity and chiral metal in the 45 ◦-twisted bilayer cuprates and related bilayers, Nature Communications 14, 7926 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Wu and Y

    Y.-M. Wu and Y. Wang,d-wave charge-4esuperconduc- tivity from fluctuating pair density waves, npj Quantum Materials9, 1 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    J. Ge, P. Wang, Y. Xing, Q. Yin, A. Wang, J. Shen, H. Lei, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Charge-4eand charge-6e flux quantization and higher charge superconductivity in kagome superconductor ring devices, Physical Review X 14, 021025 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    R. Liu, W. Wang, and X. Cui, Quartet superfluid in two- dimensional mass-imbalanced Fermi mixtures, Physical Review Letters131, 193401 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    M. O. Soldini, M. H. Fischer, and T. Neupert, Charge-4e superconductivity in a Hubbard model, Physical Review B109, 214509 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Primary charge-4e superconduc- tivity from doping a featureless Mott insulator,

    Z.-Q. Gao, Y.-Q. Wang, Y.-H. Zhang, and H. Yang, Primary charge-4e superconductivity from doping a fea- tureless Mott insulator (2026), arXiv:2602.03925 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Jiang, Z.-X

    Y.-F. Jiang, Z.-X. Li, S. A. Kivelson, and H. Yao, Charge- 4esuperconductors: A Majorana quantum Monte Carlo study, Physical Review B95, 241103 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    You, Y.-C

    Y.-Z. You, Y.-C. He, C. Xu, and A. Vishwanath, Sym- metric fermion mass generation as deconfined quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. X8, 011026 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    Khalaf, P

    E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, and A. Vishwanath, Symme- try constraints on superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene: Fractional vortices, 4econdensates, or nonuni- tary pairing, Phys. Rev. B105, 224508 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    N. V. Gnezdilov and Y. Wang, Solvable model for a charge-4esuperconductor, Physical Review B106, 094508 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Topological Charge-2ne Superconduc- tors,

    Z.-Q. Gao, Y.-Q. Wang, H. Yang, and C. Wu, Topological charge-2ne superconductors, arXiv:2512.21325 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Samoilenka and E

    A. Samoilenka and E. Babaev, Microscopic theory of elec- tron quadrupling condensates, Physical Review Research 8, 013139 (2026)

    2026

  28. [28]

    Shi and S

    H. Shi and S. Zhang, Infinite variance in fermion quan- tum Monte Carlo calculations, Phys. Rev. E93, 033303 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    Wan and S

    Z.-Q. Wan and S. Zhang, Addressing the infinite vari- ance problem in fermionic Monte Carlo simulations: Ret- rospective error remediation and the exact bridge link method, Phys. Rev. E112, 065309 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields, Physical Review D19, 3682 (1979)

    1979

  31. [31]

    Hikami, Non-linearσmodel of Grassmann Mani- fold and non-Abelian gauge field with scalar coupling, Progress of Theoretical Physics64, 1425 (1980)

    S. Hikami, Non-linearσmodel of Grassmann Mani- fold and non-Abelian gauge field with scalar coupling, Progress of Theoretical Physics64, 1425 (1980)

    1980

  32. [32]

    Senthil, A

    T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined quantum critical points, Sci- ence303, 1490 (2004)

    2004

  33. [33]

    C. Wang, A. Nahum, M. A. Metlitski, C. Xu, and T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: Symme- tries and dualities, Phys. Rev. X7, 031051 (2017)

    2017

  34. [34]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, Walking, weak first-order transitions, and complex CFTs, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 108 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Bonati, A

    C. Bonati, A. Pelissetto, I. Soler Calero, and E. Vi- cari, Charged critical behavior and nonperturbative con- tinuum limit of three-dimensional lattice SU(N c) gauge Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D110, 094504 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Ihrig, N

    B. Ihrig, N. Zerf, P. Marquard, I. F. Herbut, and M. M. Scherer, Abelian Higgs model at four loops, fixed-point collision, and deconfined criticality, Phys. Rev. B100, 134507 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Ma and C

    R. Ma and C. Wang, Theory of deconfined pseudocriti- cality, Phys. Rev. B102, 020407 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Nahum, Note on Wess-Zumino-Witten models and quasiuniversality in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys

    A. Nahum, Note on Wess-Zumino-Witten models and quasiuniversality in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. B102, 201116 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Z. Zhou, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, SO(5) deconfined phase transition under the fuzzy-sphere microscope: Ap- proximate conformal symmetry, pseudo-criticality, and operator spectrum, Phys. Rev. X14, 021044 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    X. Zou, S. Yin, Z.-X. Li, and H. Yao, Unraveling decon- fined quantum criticality in non-Hermitian easy-plane J- Q model, arXiv:2511.03456 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Loison, A Monte Carlo study for the critical exponents of the three-dimensional O(6) model, Physica A271, 157 (1999)

    D. Loison, A Monte Carlo study for the critical exponents of the three-dimensional O(6) model, Physica A271, 157 (1999)

    1999

  42. [42]

    S. A. Antonenko and A. I. Sokolov, Critical exponents for a three-dimensional O(n)-symmetric model withn >3, 7 Phys. Rev. E51, 1894 (1995)

    1995

  43. [43]

    How- ever, it is well-known that the one-loop results signifi- cantly overestimate the critical flavor atϵ= 1 [35, 36]

    Our one-loop calculation givesN ∗ f = 399.83+O(ϵ). How- ever, it is well-known that the one-loop results signifi- cantly overestimate the critical flavor atϵ= 1 [35, 36]. Our analysis of the collision fixed point, together with its excellent agreement with the DQMC results, suggests thatN ∗ f lies close to the physical valueN f = 4 atϵ= 1

  44. [44]

    Nauenberg and D

    M. Nauenberg and D. J. Scalapino, Singularities and scaling functions at the Potts-model multicritical point, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 837 (1980)

    1980

  45. [45]

    J. L. Cardy, M. Nauenberg, and D. J. Scalapino, Scaling theory of the Potts-model multicritical point, Phys. Rev. B22, 2560 (1980)

    1980

  46. [46]

    D. T. Son, Superconductivity by long-range color mag- netic interaction in high-density quark matter, Phys. Rev. D59, 094019 (1999)

    1999

  47. [47]

    Zou and D

    L. Zou and D. Chowdhury, Deconfined metallic quantum criticality: AU(2) gauge-theoretic approach, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023344 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quan- tum matter, Science357, 1002 (2017)

    2017

  49. [49]

    Mukherjee, J

    B. Mukherjee, J. M. Hutson, and K. R. A. Hazzard, SU(N) magnetism with ultracold molecules, New Jour- nal of Physics27, 013013 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Shi, Z.-Z

    S.-H. Shi, Z.-Z. Wu, J. Hu, and Z.-X. Li, High- temperature charge-4e superconductivity in su(4) inter- acting fermions, arXiv (2026). 8 METHOD DQMC Algorithm.The SU(4) Hubbard model de- fined in Eq. (1) reads ˆH=−t X a,⟨ij⟩ (ca i †ca j + h.c.)−U X i ( X a ˆna i −2) 2 = ˆK+ ˆV , (5) where ˆKand ˆVdenote the kinetic and interaction terms, respectively. To ...

    2026