Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Fluctuations for the Toda lattice

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Space-time fluctuations of currents in the Toda lattice converge to an explicit Gaussian limit under diffusive scaling.

desk verdict Aggarwal and Nicoletti derive an explicit Gaussian limit for Toda lattice current fluctuations from a quasi-particle scattering model, but the error control when passing from exact dynamics to that picture is the spot that needs checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.14346 v2 pith:IOJY4PHQ submitted 2026-04-15 math.PR math.DS

Amol Aggarwal , Matthew Nicoletti This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath.DS
keywords TodalatticefluctuationsdiffusivescalingGaussianlimitquasi-particlesLévy-Chentsovfieldthermalequilibriumcorrelationfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper models the Toda lattice at thermal equilibrium, where particle momenta are independent Gaussians and certain exponential terms are independent Gammas. It establishes that, after diffusive rescaling in space and time, the joint fluctuations of the model's currents converge to a specific Gaussian process. This limit is derived by viewing the lattice as a dense collection of quasi-particles whose scattering produces a dressed Lévy-Chentsov field. A sympathetic reader cares because the result supplies exact, computable predictions for how local currents vary in an integrable many-body system, including the scaling of particle trajectories and two-point correlations.

What carries the argument

The dressed Lévy-Chentsov field, which is the Gaussian process that encodes the joint space-time fluctuations of the quasi-particles after they interact through scattering.

What would settle it

A direct numerical integration of the Toda lattice equations starting from the thermal-equilibrium measure, evolved to large diffusive times, that fails to produce Gaussian-distributed current fluctuations with the predicted covariance structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The full joint scaling limit of the fluctuations for these quasi-particles is given by a Gaussian process, called a dressed Lévy-Chentsov field. As a direct consequence, the space-time fluctuations for the model's currents converge to an explicit Gaussian limit. This yields the scaling limit for the trajectory of a single particle q0 as a Brownian motion, and shows that space-time two-point correlation functions decay inversely with time according to explicit scaling distributions.

Load-bearing premise

The Toda lattice can be treated as a dense collection of many quasi-particles whose interactions occur only through scattering.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The position q0 of any tagged particle converges, after diffusive scaling, to a standard Brownian motion.
  • Two-point correlation functions of the currents and densities decay as 1/t with explicit, non-universal scaling forms.
  • The same Gaussian limit governs the joint statistics of currents at multiple space-time points.
  • Higher-order correlation functions of the currents admit explicit Gaussian expressions via the properties of the limiting field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same quasi-particle fluctuation picture may extend to other integrable lattices or chains with similar scattering data.
  • Numerical checks of the predicted covariance could be performed by sampling many independent thermal-equilibrium initial conditions and averaging current trajectories.
  • The explicit Gaussian limit supplies a concrete benchmark for hydrodynamic fluctuation theories that predict similar 1/t decay in one dimension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the Toda lattice at thermal equilibrium, with independent Gaussian p_j and Gamma-distributed e^{q_j - q_{j+1}}. Under diffusive scaling, it claims that space-time fluctuations of the currents converge to an explicit Gaussian limit. The central argument models the lattice as a dense collection of quasi-particles interacting via scattering and establishes that the joint scaling limit of their fluctuations is a Gaussian process termed the dressed Lévy-Chentsov field. Consequences include a Brownian-motion limit for the trajectory of a tagged particle q_0 and explicit inverse-time decay for two-point correlation functions, matching predictions of Doyon and Spohn.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete Gaussian fluctuation process for an integrable system and furnishes explicit, parameter-free predictions for currents and correlations. The dressed Lévy-Chentsov field is a new limiting object that may prove useful for other soliton gases or integrable chains. The explicit match to existing hydrodynamic predictions is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§1 and the statement of the main limit theorem] The abstract and §1 present the quasi-particle scattering picture as the starting point for the joint scaling limit, yet no quantitative approximation theorem or error bound is stated that controls the difference between the exact microscopic Toda evolution (with the given Gaussian-Gamma initial data) and the effective scattering dynamics at the level of fluctuations. Without such control, it is unclear whether conserved-quantity correlations survive diffusive scaling and modify the covariance of the limiting dressed Lévy-Chentsov field.
  2. [Core derivation of the dressed Lévy-Chentsov field] The passage from the microscopic current fluctuations to the explicit Gaussian limit appears to rely on the quasi-particle representation without an intermediate tightness or convergence lemma that would justify interchanging the diffusive scaling with the scattering map. This step is load-bearing for the claim that the limit is unaffected by the integrable structure.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the dressed Lévy-Chentsov field is introduced without an explicit covariance formula in the introduction; a self-contained definition would improve readability.
  2. [Corollary following the main theorem] The statement of the single-particle Brownian-motion limit (consequence (i)) should include the explicit variance in terms of the thermal parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional justification where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§1 and the statement of the main limit theorem] The abstract and §1 present the quasi-particle scattering picture as the starting point for the joint scaling limit, yet no quantitative approximation theorem or error bound is stated that controls the difference between the exact microscopic Toda evolution (with the given Gaussian-Gamma initial data) and the effective scattering dynamics at the level of fluctuations. Without such control, it is unclear whether conserved-quantity correlations survive diffusive scaling and modify the covariance of the limiting dressed Lévy-Chentsov field.

    Authors: The quasi-particle representation follows directly from the Lax-pair formulation of the Toda lattice, for which the scattering map (including all phase shifts) is exact. The Gaussian-Gamma initial measure is the unique equilibrium that renders the quasi-particles asymptotically independent with Poisson statistics in the thermodynamic limit. We nevertheless agree that an explicit error estimate would remove any ambiguity about residual correlations from conserved quantities. In the revised version we will add a new lemma (placed after the definition of the quasi-particle map) that bounds the L^2 difference between the microscopic current and the current reconstructed from the scattered quasi-particles; the bound is o(1) uniformly on compact space-time sets under diffusive scaling and relies on the exponential spatial decay of the equilibrium correlations together with finite propagation speed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Core derivation of the dressed Lévy-Chentsov field] The passage from the microscopic current fluctuations to the explicit Gaussian limit appears to rely on the quasi-particle representation without an intermediate tightness or convergence lemma that would justify interchanging the diffusive scaling with the scattering map. This step is load-bearing for the claim that the limit is unaffected by the integrable structure.

    Authors: The proof proceeds by first applying the exact scattering transformation to obtain the quasi-particle trajectories, then passing to the diffusive scaling limit of their empirical fluctuations. To make the interchange rigorous we will insert two intermediate statements: (i) a tightness criterion for the rescaled fluctuation field, obtained from uniform fourth-moment bounds that follow from the Gaussian and Gamma tails of the initial data; (ii) a convergence lemma showing that any limit point satisfies the linear stochastic equation whose unique solution is the dressed Lévy-Chentsov field. These will appear as a new subsection immediately preceding the identification of the limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation chain is self-contained from explicit initial data and quasi-particle modeling choice

full rationale

The paper begins with the explicit thermal-equilibrium distributions (independent Gaussians for p_j and Gammas for e^{q_j - q_{j+1}}) and treats the quasi-particle scattering picture as an invoked starting point rather than a derived or fitted object. The core step is then to prove that the joint scaling limit of fluctuations for these quasi-particles is a dressed Lévy-Chentsov field, which is presented as an independent mathematical result rather than a tautological renaming or self-referential definition. No equation or claim reduces by construction to its own inputs, and cited works (Doyon, Spohn) are external. This yields a normal non-circular finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the thermal-equilibrium distributions for p and q variables plus the quasi-particle scattering interpretation; these are domain assumptions rather than derived quantities.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The variables (p_j) are independent Gaussians and (e^{q_j - q_{j+1}}) are independent Gamma random variables, defining thermal equilibrium.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the initial condition for the Toda lattice.
  • domain assumption The Toda lattice admits a dense collection of quasi-particles that interact through scattering.
    Invoked as the starting point for the fluctuation analysis.
invented entities (1)
  • dressed Lévy-Chentsov field
    purpose: Gaussian process describing the joint scaling limit of quasi-particle fluctuations.
    Introduced as the core technical object whose existence yields the current fluctuations; no independent falsifiable evidence supplied beyond the derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluctuations for the Toda lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IOJY4PHQ

@misc{pith2026260414346,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluctuations for the Toda lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IOJY4PHQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.14346}
}
abstract

In this paper we consider the Toda lattice $(\mathbf{p}(t);\mathbf{q}(t))$ at thermal equilibrium, meaning that its variables $(p_j)$ and $(e^{q_j-q_{j+1}})$ are independent Gaussian and Gamma random variables, respectively. We show under diffusive scaling that the space-time fluctuations for the model's currents converge to an explicit Gaussian limit. As consequences, we deduce, (i) the scaling limit for the trajectory of a single particle $q_0$ is a Brownian motion; (ii) space-time two-point correlation functions for the model decay inversely with time, with explicit scaling distributions predicted by Doyon (SciPost Phys. 5 (2018), 054) and Spohn (J. Phys. A 53 (2020), 265004). Our starting point is the notion that the Toda lattice can be thought of as a dense collection of many ``quasi-particles'' that interact through scattering. The core of our work is to establish that the full joint scaling limit of the fluctuations for these quasi-particles is given by a Gaussian process, called a dressed L\'evy-Chentsov field.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Periodic directed landscape

    math.PR 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The periodic directed landscape is constructed by gluing full-space directed landscapes, and proven to be the universal scaling limit of periodic exponential LPP and of periodic ASEP.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Asymptotic Scattering Relation for the Toda Lattice

    A. Aggarwal. Asymptotic scattering relation for the Toda lattice. Preprint, arXiv:2503.08018

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [2]

    Aggarwal

    A. Aggarwal. Effective velocities in the Toda lattice. To appear inCommun. Pure Appl. Math., Preprint, arXiv:2503.11407

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    Allez, J.-P

    R. Allez, J.-P. Bouchaud, and A. Guionnet. Invariant beta ensembles and the Gauss-Wigner crossover.Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(9):094102, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Berthet and D

    P. Berthet and D. M. Mason. Revisiting two strong approximation results of Dudley and Philipp. InHigh dimensional probability, volume 51 ofIMS Lecture Notes Monogr. Ser., pages 155–172. Inst. Math. Statist., Beachwood, OH, 2006

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Bertini, M

    B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti. Transport in out-of-equilibrium XXZ chains: exact profiles of charges and currents.Physical review letters, 117(20):207201, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Bhatia.Matrix Analysis, volume 169 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

    R. Bhatia.Matrix Analysis, volume 169 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1 edition, 1997

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    Bloch, F

    A. Bloch, F. Golse, T. Paul, and A. Uribe. Dispersionless Toda and Toeplitz operators.Duke Math. J., 117(1):157–196, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Bodineau, I

    T. Bodineau, I. Gallagher, and L. Saint-Raymond. The Brownian motion as the limit of a deterministic system of hard-spheres.Invent. Math., 203(2):493–553, 2016. 164 AMOL AGGARWAL AND MATTHEW NICOLETTI

    work page 2016

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Bodineau, I

    T. Bodineau, I. Gallagher, L. Saint-Raymond, and S. Simonella. Dynamics of dilute gases: a statistical approach. InICM—International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol. 2. Plenary lectures, pages 750–795. EMS Press, Berlin, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Bodineau, I

    T. Bodineau, I. Gallagher, L. Saint-Raymond, and S. Simonella. Long-time correlations for a hard-sphere gas at equilibrium.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 76(12):3852–3911, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Bodineau, I

    T. Bodineau, I. Gallagher, L. Saint-Raymond, and S. Simonella. Long-time derivation at equilibrium of the fluctuating Boltzmann equation.Ann. Probab., 52(1):217–295, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Boldrighini, R

    C. Boldrighini, R. L. Dobrushin, and Y. M. Sukhov. One-dimensional hard rod caricature of hydrodynamics.J. Statist. Phys., 31(3):577–616, 1983

    1983

  5. [13]

    Navier-Stokes cor- rection

    C. Boldrighini and Y. M. Suhov. One-dimensional hard-rod caricature of hydrodynamics: “Navier-Stokes cor- rection” for local equilibrium initial states.Commun. Math. Phys., 189(2):577–590, 1997

    1997

  6. [14]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura. Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium.Physical Review X, 6(4):041065, 2016

    2016

  7. [15]

    N. N. Chentsov. L´ evy Brownian motion for several parameters and generalized white noise.Theory Probab. Appl., 2(2):265–266, 1957

    1957

  8. [16]

    I. Corwin. The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class.Random Matrices Theory Appl., 1(1):1130001, 76, 2012

    2012

  9. [17]

    D. A. Croydon and M. Sasada. Generalized hydrodynamic limit for the box–ball system.Commun. Math. Phys., 383(1):427–463, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    De Nardis, D

    J. De Nardis, D. Bernard, and B. Doyon. Hydrodynamic diffusion in integrable systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(16):160603, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    De Nardis, D

    J. De Nardis, D. Bernard, and B. Doyon. Diffusion in generalized hydrodynamics and quasiparticle scattering. SciPost Phys., 6:049, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Deift, S

    P. Deift, S. Kamvissis, T. Kriecherbauer, and X. Zhou. The Toda rarefaction problem.Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 49(1):35–83, 1996

    1996

  13. [21]

    Deift and K

    P. Deift and K. T.-R. McLaughlin. A continuum limit of the Toda lattice.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 131(624):x+216, 1998

    1998

  14. [22]

    Diederich

    S. Diederich. A conventional approach to dynamic correlations in the toda lattice.Phys. Lett. A, 85(4):233–235, 1981

    1981

  15. [23]

    B. Doyon. Lecture notes on generalised hydrodynamics.SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, page 018, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    Doyon and F

    B. Doyon and F. H¨ ubner. Ab initio derivation of generalised hydrodynamics from a gas of interacting wave packets. Preprint, arXiv:2307.09307

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Doyon, F

    B. Doyon, F. H¨ ubner, and T. Yoshimura. New classical integrable systems from generalized tt-deformations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(25):251602, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Doyon, T

    B. Doyon, T. Yoshimura, and J.-S. Caux. Soliton gases and generalized hydrodynamics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(4):045301, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    T. K. Duy and T. Shirai. The mean spectral measures of random Jacobi matrices related to Gaussian beta ensembles.Electron. Commun. Probab., 20:no. 68, 13, 2015

    2015

  20. [28]

    Dworaczek Guera and R

    C. Dworaczek Guera and R. Memin. CLT for realβ-ensembles at high temperature.Electron. J. Probab., 29:Paper No. 171, 45, 2024

    2024

  21. [30]

    P. A. Ferrari, C. Franceschini, D. G. E. Grevino, and H. Spohn. Hard rod hydrodynamics and the L´ evy Chentsov field. InProbability and statistical mechanics—papers in honor of Errico Presutti, volume 38 ofEnsaios Mat., pages 185–222. Soc. Brasil. Mat., Rio de Janeiro, 2023

    2023

  22. [31]

    P. A. Ferrari, C. Nguyen, L. T. Rolla, and M. Wang. Soliton decomposition of the box-ball system.Forum Math. Sigma, 9:Paper No. e60, 37, 2021

    2021

  23. [32]

    P. A. Ferrari and S. Olla. Macroscopic diffusive fluctuations for generalized hard rods dynamics.Ann. Appl. Probab., 35(2):1125–1142, 2025

    2025

  24. [33]

    P. L. Ferrari and H. Spohn. Scaling limit for the space-time covariance of the stationary totally asymmetric simple exclusion process.Comm. Math. Phys., 265(1):1–44, 2006

    2006

  25. [34]

    Flaschka

    H. Flaschka. The Toda lattice. II. Existence of integrals.Phys. Rev. B, 9(4):1924–1925, 1974

    1924

  26. [35]

    Gopalakrishnan, D

    S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, V. Khemani, and R. Vasseur. Hydrodynamics of operator spreading and quasi- particle diffusion in interacting integrable systems.Phys. Rev. B, 98(22):220303, 2018. FLUCTUATIONS FOR THE TODA LATTICE 165

    2018

  27. [36]

    Gou¨ ezel

    S. Gou¨ ezel. Limit theorems in dynamical systems using the spectral method. InHyperbolic dynamics, fluctuations and large deviations, volume 89 ofProc. Sympos. Pure Math., pages 161–193. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2015

    2015

  28. [37]

    Grava, A

    T. Grava, A. Guionnet, K. K. Kozlowski, and A. Little. Large deviations of the periodic Toda chain. Preprint, arXiv:2604.00635

    arXiv

  29. [38]

    Guionnet and R

    A. Guionnet and R. M´ emin. Large deviations for Gibbs ensembles of the classical Toda chain.Electron. J. Probab., 27:1–29, 2022

    2022

  30. [39]

    Johansson

    K. Johansson. Shape fluctuations and random matrices.Commun. Math. Phys., 209(2):437–476, 2000

    2000

  31. [40]

    Kappeler and P

    T. Kappeler and P. Topalov. Global wellposedness of KdV inH −1(T,R).Duke Math. J., 135(2):327–360, 2006

    2006

  32. [41]

    Kardar, G

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang. Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces.Phys. Rev. Lett., 56(9):889, 1986

    1986

  33. [42]

    Killip, J

    R. Killip, J. Murphy, and M. Visan. Invariance of white noise for KdV on the line.Invent. Math., 222(1):203–282, 2020

    2020

  34. [43]

    Kr¨ uger and G

    H. Kr¨ uger and G. Teschl. Long-time asymptotics of the Toda lattice for decaying initial data revisited.Rev. Math. Phys., 21(1):61–109, 2009

    2009

  35. [44]

    Kunz and B

    H. Kunz and B. Souillard. Sur le spectre des op´ erateurs aux diff´ erences finies al´ eatoires.Commun. Math. Phys., 78(2):201–246, 1980/81

    1980

  36. [45]

    L´ evy.Processus Stochastiques et Mouvement Brownien

    P. L´ evy.Processus Stochastiques et Mouvement Brownien. Suivi d’une note de M. Lo` eve. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1948

    1948

  37. [46]

    Lukkarinen and H

    J. Lukkarinen and H. Spohn. Weakly nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with random initial data.Invent. Math., 183(1):79–188, 2011

    2011

  38. [47]

    S. V. Manakov. Complete integrability and stochastization of discrete dynamical systems.Soviet Physics JETP 40 (1974), pages 269–274, 1974

    1974

  39. [48]

    Matetski, J

    K. Matetski, J. Quastel, and D. Remenik. Polynuclear growth and the Toda lattice. To appear inJ. Eur. Math. Soc., Preprint, arXiv:2209.02643

  40. [49]

    Matetski, J

    K. Matetski, J. Quastel, and D. Remenik. The KPZ fixed point.Acta Math., 227(1):115–203, 2021

    2021

  41. [50]

    G. Mazzuca. On the mean density of states of some matrices related to the beta ensembles and an application to the Toda lattice.J. Math. Phys., 63(4):Paper No. 043501, 13, 2022

    2022

  42. [51]

    Mazzuca, T

    G. Mazzuca, T. Grava, T. Kriecherbauer, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, C. B. Mendl, and H. Spohn. Equilibrium spacetime correlations of the Toda lattice on the hydrodynamic scale.J. Stat. Phys., 190(8):Paper No. 149, 22, 2023

    2023

  43. [52]

    Mazzuca and R

    G. Mazzuca and R. Memin. CLT forβ-ensembles at high temperature and for integrable systems: a transfer operator approach.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 26(1):245–316, 2025

    2025

  44. [53]

    N. Minami. Local fluctuation of the spectrum of a multidimensional Anderson tight binding model.Commun. Math. Phys., 177(3):709–725, 1996

    1996

  45. [54]

    J. Moser. Finitely many mass points on the line under the influence of an exponential potential—an integrable system. In A. Deprit and A. Elipe, editors,Dynamical Systems, Theory and Applications, volume 38 ofLecture Notes in Physics, pages 467–497. Springer, Berlin / New York...

    1975

  46. [55]

    S. Olla, M. Sasada, and H. Suda. Scaling limits of solitons in the box-ball system. Preprint, arXiv:2411.14818

  47. [56]

    M. Opper. Analytical solution of the classical Bethe ansatz equation for the Toda chain.Phys. Lett. A, 112(5):201–203, 1985

    1985

  48. [57]

    Pr¨ ahofer and H

    M. Pr¨ ahofer and H. Spohn. Exact scaling functions for one-dimensional stationary KPZ growth.J. Statist. Phys., 115(1-2):255–279, 2004

    2004

  49. [58]

    Presutti and W

    E. Presutti and W. D. Wick. Macroscopic stochastic fluctuations in a one-dimensional mechanical system.J. Statist. Phys., 52(1-2):497–502, 1988

    1988

  50. [59]

    J. Quastel. Introduction to KPZ. In S. Yau, editor,Current Developments in Mathematics, pages 125–194. International Press, 2012. Available as a survey of the KPZ equation and universality class

    2012

  51. [60]

    Quastel and B

    J. Quastel and B. Valk´ o. KdV preserves white noise.Commun. Math. Phys., 277(3):707–714, 2008

    2008

  52. [61]

    N. Saitoh. A transformation connecting the Toda lattice and the KdV equation.J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 49(1):409– 416, 1980

    1980

  53. [62]

    Schenker

    J. Schenker. Eigenvector localization for random band matrices with power law band width.Commun. Math. Phys., 290(3):1065–1097, 2009

    2009

  54. [63]

    Schneider

    T. Schneider. Classical statistical mechanics of lattice dynamic model systems: transfer integral and molecular- dynamics studies. InStatics and Dynamics of Nonlinear Systems: Proceedings of a Workshop at the Ettore Majorana Centre, Erice, Italy, 1–11 July, 1983, pages 212–241...

    1983

  55. [64]

    Schneider and E

    T. Schneider and E. Stoll. Excitation spectrum of the Toda lattice: a molecular-dynamics study.Phys. Rev. Lett., 45(12):997, 1980

    1980

  56. [65]

    H. Spohn. Hydrodynamical theory for equilibrium time correlation functions of hard rods.Ann. Physics, 141(2):353–364, 1982

    1982

  57. [66]

    H. Spohn. Nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics for anharmonic chains.Journal of Statistical Physics, 154(5):1191–1227, 2014

    2014

  58. [67]

    H. Spohn. Ballistic space-time correlators of the classical Toda lattice.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 53(26):265004, jun 2020

    2020

  59. [68]

    H. Spohn. Generalized Gibbs ensembles of the classical Toda chain.Journal of Statistical Physics, 180(1):4–22, 2020

    2020

  60. [69]

    Spohn.Hydrodynamic Scales of Integrable Many-Body Systems

    H. Spohn.Hydrodynamic Scales of Integrable Many-Body Systems. World Scientific Publishing Co., 2024

    2024

  61. [70]

    D. W. Stroock.Gaussian measures in finite and infinite dimensions. Universitext. Springer, Cham, 2023

    2023

  62. [71]

    Takahashi and J

    D. Takahashi and J. Satsuma. A soliton cellular automaton.J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 59(10):3514–3519, 1990

    1990

  63. [72]

    Teschl.Jacobi operators and completely integrable nonlinear lattices, volume 72 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs

    G. Teschl.Jacobi operators and completely integrable nonlinear lattices, volume 72 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000

    2000

  64. [73]

    M. Toda. Wave propagation in anharmonic lattices.J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 23(3):501–506, 1967

    1967

  65. [74]

    L. N. Trefethen.Approximation theory and approximation practice. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathe- matics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2020

    2020

  66. [75]

    van Beijeren

    H. van Beijeren. Exact results for anomalous transport in one-dimensional Hamiltonian systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:180601, Apr 2012

    2012

  67. [76]

    Venakides, P

    S. Venakides, P. Deift, and R. Oba. The Toda shock problem.Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 44(8–9):1171–1242, 1991

    1991

  68. [77]

    A. Y. Zaitsev. Estimates of the L´ evy–Prokhorov distance in the multivariate central limit theorem for random variables with finite exponential moments.Theory Probab. Appl., 31(2):203–220, 1987

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.