Recognition: unknown
Zero Cancellation and Equation Structure in Kiselman's Semigroup
Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 13:08 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
In Kiselman's semigroup K_n, xy equals the zero element f only if x equals f whenever y lies in the subsemigroup generated by a2 through an, while xa1 equals f has exactly 1 plus the order of K_{n-1} solutions.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We prove that if y ∈ K_n lies in the subsemigroup generated by a2, …, an, then xy = f implies x = f. In contrast, the equation xa1 = f admits non-trivial solutions. We describe the solution set of this equation, show that its cardinality is 1 + |K_{n-1}|, and study its algebraic structure. Moreover, we show that |K_{2n+1}| is even, whereas |K_{2n}| is odd.
What carries the argument
The zero element f and the distinction between the full generating set and the subsemigroup on a2 through an. This distinction isolates which right factors can be left-annihilated non-trivially and enables recursive counting of solutions.
If this is right
- Left multiplication by any non-zero element cannot send any y from the subsemigroup on a2..an to f.
- The left annihilator of a1 has cardinality exactly 1 + |K_{n-1}|.
- The solution set of xa1 = f carries an algebraic structure that can be described explicitly from the smaller semigroup.
- The cardinality of K_n is odd when n is even and even when n is odd.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The selective annihilation property allows a recursive construction of K_n by adjoining a1 to a copy of K_{n-1} while controlling the new zero equations.
- The parity alternation suggests that the elements of K_n admit a natural pairing or involution precisely when n is odd.
- The same counting technique may apply to left annihilators of other specific generators or to related semigroups with distinguished generators.
Load-bearing premise
K_n is the semigroup generated by a1 to an together with a zero element f that absorbs every product containing it.
What would settle it
Explicit enumeration of the elements of K_2 or K_3 together with a direct count of the distinct solutions x to xa1 = f, or a direct check of whether |K_3| is even.
read the original abstract
We investigate equations in Kiselman's semigroup $K_n$, generated by $a_1, \dots, a_n$. Let $f$ denote the zero element of $K_n$. We prove that if $y \in K_n$ lies in the subsemigroup generated by $a_2, \dots, a_n$, then $x y = f$ implies $x = f$. In contrast, the equation $x a_1 = f$ admits non-trivial solutions. We describe the solution set of this equation, show that its cardinality is $1 + |K_{n-1}|$, and study its algebraic structure. Moreover, we show that $|K_{2n+1}|$ is even, whereas $|K_{2n}|$ is odd.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper examines equations with the zero element f in Kiselman's semigroup K_n generated by a1,...,an. It proves a zero-cancellation property: if y belongs to the subsemigroup generated by a2,...,an then xy=f implies x=f. In contrast, the equation xa1=f has nontrivial solutions; the solution set is described explicitly, shown to have cardinality 1+|K_{n-1}|, and its algebraic structure is analyzed via a bijection with K_{n-1} union {f}. The paper also establishes that |K_{2n+1}| is even while |K_{2n}| is odd, using an inductive argument based on a normal-form description of elements and a recurrence for the orders.
Significance. If the claims hold, the results supply concrete structural data on Kiselman's semigroups, including explicit solution sets to linear equations over the zero and parity information on their finite orders. The normal-form reduction rules and inductive proofs are finitary and self-contained, providing a reusable framework for further investigation of these semigroups in combinatorial algebra.
minor comments (3)
- [Section 2] The normal-form reduction rules in the preliminary section would benefit from an explicit small-n example (e.g., n=3) showing how a word reduces to f or to a non-zero element, to make the zero-cancellation argument more immediately verifiable.
- [Section 4] The recurrence relation used for the parity proof is stated but the exact form of the 'something' term whose parity is controlled should be written out explicitly rather than left implicit, even if the induction closes.
- [Section 4] A short table listing |K_n| for n=1 to 6 would allow the reader to check the claimed parity pattern directly against the cardinality formula for the solution set of xa1=f.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the recommendation to accept the manuscript. The referee's summary correctly identifies the key results on zero-cancellation for elements generated by a2 through an, the explicit description of solutions to xa1 = f, and the parity of the orders |K_m|.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; results follow directly from semigroup definition and induction
full rationale
The paper's claims rest on the explicit normal-form description of elements in K_n (words over generators with reduction rules absorbing to f) and an inductive argument on n. The zero-cancellation for y generated by a2..an follows immediately from the normal-form rules preventing non-zero x y from reducing to f. The solution set to x a1 = f is partitioned via explicit bijection to {f} union a copy of K_{n-1} by prefixing a1 and applying reductions. Parity of |K_n| follows from a recurrence verified by induction. No self-citations, fitted inputs, or ansatzes are invoked; all steps are finitary consequences of the standard presentation of K_n.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption K_n is the semigroup generated by a1..an with zero element f satisfying absorption
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Dynamics, Random Products, and Ultrametric Geometry in Kiselman's Semigroup
In Kiselman's semigroup, partial products always stabilize, random stabilization times are sums of n geometrics, and a natural ultrametric exists.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Semigroup Forum 86(1), 32–40 (2013)
Aragona, R., D’Andrea, A.: Hecke–Kiselman monoids of sm all cardinality. Semigroup Forum 86(1), 32–40 (2013)
2013
-
[2]
Algebra Discrete Math
Aragona, R., D’Andrea, A.: Normal form in Hecke–Kiselma n monoids associated with simple oriented graphs. Algebra Discrete Math. 30(2), 161–171 (2020)
2020
-
[3]
Semigroup Forum (2025)
Andrenšek, L.: A complete classification of endomorphis ms of Kiselman’s semi- group. Semigroup Forum (2025)
2025
-
[4]
Demonstr
Ashikhmin, D.N., Volkov, M.V., Zhang, W.T.: The finite ba sis problem for Kiselman monoids. Demonstr. Math. 48, 475–492 (2015)
2015
-
[5]
Camb ridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and All That. Camb ridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
1998
-
[6]
Collina, E., D’Andrea, A.: A graph-dynamical interpret ation of Kiselman’s semigroups. J. Algebraic Combin. 41(4), 1115–1132 (2015)
2015
-
[7]
D’Andrea, A., Stella, S.: The cardinality of Kiselman’s semigroups grows double- exponentially. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 30(5), 570–576 (2023)
2023
-
[8]
Forsberg, L.: Effective representations of Hecke–Kisel man monoids of type An. arXiv:1205.0676v4 (2017)
-
[9]
Ganyushkin, O., Mazorchuk, V.: On Kiselman quotients of 0-Hecke monoids. Int. Electron. J. Algebra 10(2), 174–191 (2011)
2011
-
[10]
Kiselman, C.: A semigroup of operators in convexity the ory. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354(5), 2035–2053 (2002)
2035
-
[11]
Yokohama Math
Kudryavtseva, G., Mazorchuk, V.: On Kiselman’s semigr oup. Yokohama Math. J. 55(1), 21–46 (2009)
2009
-
[12]
Semigroup Forum 110(3), 597–614 (2025)
Lebed, V.: The word problem for Hecke–Kiselman monoids of type An and ˜An. Semigroup Forum 110(3), 597–614 (2025)
2025
-
[13]
Semigroup Forum 99(2), 447–464 (2019)
Męcel, A., Okniński, J.: Gröbner basis and the automato n property of Hecke– Kiselman algebras. Semigroup Forum 99(2), 447–464 (2019)
2019
-
[14]
Okniński, J., Wiertel, M.: Combinatorics and structur e of Hecke–Kiselman algebras. Commun. Contemp. Math. 22(07), 2050022 (2020)
2020
-
[15]
Okniński, J., Wiertel, M.: On the radical of a Hecke–Kis elman algebra. Algebr. Represent. Theory 24(6), 1431–1440 (2021)
2021
-
[16]
Linear 17 Algebra Appl
Wiertel, M.: Irreducible representations of Hecke–Ki selman monoids. Linear 17 Algebra Appl. 640, 12–33 (2022)
2022
-
[17]
Forum Math
Wiertel, M.: The Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of Hecke– Kiselman algebras. Forum Math. 35(2), 523–534 (2023)
2023
-
[18]
Se migroup Forum 109(2), 457–466 (2024) 18
Wiertel, M.: Identities of Hecke–Kiselman monoids. Se migroup Forum 109(2), 457–466 (2024) 18
2024
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.