pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25290 · v2 · pith:UWXOYYPKnew · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🧮 math.OC

Limitations of LTI Koopman Modeling for Nonlinear Control Systems

Johannes Heeg , Karl Worthmann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 09:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords Koopman operatorLTI modelingnonlinear control systemsaffine linear dynamicscontrollabilityobservablesmodeling bias
0
0 comments X

The pith

Exact LTI Koopman representations require nonlinear control systems to have affine linear dynamics under controllability and coordinate inclusion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the conditions under which continuous-time nonlinear control systems admit exact linear time-invariant Koopman operator representations. It establishes that a mild controllability condition together with the inclusion of the state coordinate maps among the observables forces the underlying vector field to be affine linear. This result limits the scope of exact LTI Koopman lifting for applying linear control methods such as LQR or convex MPC to systems that are genuinely nonlinear. The analysis further examines how the choice of observables affects the modeling bias introduced by imposing an LTI structure.

Core claim

Assuming a mild controllability condition and the inclusion of the coordinate maps, the dynamics of the underlying control system must be affine linear.

What carries the argument

The combination of an LTI Koopman representation with a mild controllability condition on the control system and the requirement that coordinate maps belong to the set of observables.

If this is right

  • Linear control techniques such as LQR and convex MPC apply exactly via Koopman lifting only when the original system is affine linear.
  • Genuinely nonlinear systems cannot possess exact LTI Koopman models under the stated conditions.
  • The modeling error incurred by forcing an LTI structure depends explicitly on the selection of observables.
  • Approximate Koopman models become necessary whenever the system deviates from affine linearity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Relaxing either the controllability assumption or the requirement to include coordinates may allow exact LTI representations for some nonlinear systems.
  • Time-varying or bilinear Koopman structures could serve as alternatives that preserve more nonlinear behavior.
  • The result indicates that observable selection strategies should prioritize deviation from affinity when the goal is faithful nonlinear modeling.

Load-bearing premise

The control system satisfies a mild controllability condition and the observables include the coordinate maps.

What would settle it

Exhibiting a nonlinear control system that satisfies the controllability condition, includes coordinates as observables, yet possesses an exact LTI Koopman representation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25290 by Johannes Heeg, Karl Worthmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Mean EDMDc approximation error for Example 2 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Koopman operator theory yields powerful tools for modeling, analysis, and control of nonlinear dynamical systems. Prominently, linear time-invariant (LTI) Koopman representations have been proposed to enable the application of linear control techniques, such as LQR and convex MPC. In this work, we investigate the implications of exact LTI Koopman representations for continuous-time nonlinear control systems. In particular, we show that, assuming a mild controllability condition and the inclusion of the coordinate maps, the dynamics of the underlying control system must be affine linear. Furthermore, we study the modeling bias introduced by the LTI structure and analyze its dependency on the choice of observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that, for continuous-time nonlinear control systems, the existence of an exact finite-dimensional LTI Koopman representation (under a mild controllability condition on the system together with the requirement that the coordinate maps are included among the observables) necessarily implies that the underlying dynamics are affine-linear. A secondary contribution examines the modeling bias that the LTI structure introduces and its dependence on the choice of observables.

Significance. If the central implication holds, the result supplies a precise theoretical boundary on the representational power of finite-dimensional LTI Koopman lifts for control systems. It shows that such lifts cannot exactly reproduce non-affine nonlinear dynamics once controllability and coordinate inclusion are granted, thereby clarifying when linear-control techniques applied to Koopman models remain faithful to the original plant. The accompanying bias analysis offers a practical complement by quantifying how observable selection modulates the approximation error.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Abstract] The controllability assumption is described as 'mild' in the abstract and introduction; a short paragraph clarifying its precise statement (e.g., rank condition on the controllability matrix or Lie-algebraic rank) would help readers verify that it is indeed weaker than standard controllability.
  2. [Modeling-bias analysis] The modeling-bias section would benefit from an explicit statement of the norm or distance used to quantify bias (e.g., L2 on a compact set or supremum norm) and from a brief remark on whether the bias expression remains valid when the observable set is enlarged beyond the coordinate maps.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of our work. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, and we will prepare a revised manuscript accordingly. Since no specific major comments were raised, we address the overall report below.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper establishes a conditional theorem: under a mild controllability assumption on the control system together with the requirement that coordinate maps are included in the observable set, any continuous-time system admitting an exact finite-dimensional LTI Koopman representation must have affine-linear dynamics. This is presented as a direct mathematical implication from the stated assumptions, with no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-citation chains invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz smuggled in via prior work. The modeling-bias analysis is treated as a separate secondary contribution. The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on two domain assumptions from control theory; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mild controllability condition on the nonlinear control system
    Used to reach the affine-linearity conclusion in the main theorem.
  • domain assumption Inclusion of coordinate maps among the observables
    Required for the exact LTI representation to force affine dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5630 in / 989 out tokens · 29828 ms · 2026-07-01T09:10:00.675540+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Koopman meets input-output data: Data-driven output-feedback control of nonlinear systems with closed-loop guarantees

    eess.SY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A method is proposed to design data-driven output-feedback controllers for nonlinear systems with provable exponential stability guarantees using only input-output measurements via Koopman-based bilinear surrogate mod...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bruce Croft

    Qingyao Ai, Keping Bi, Jiafeng Guo, and W. Bruce Croft. 2018. Learning a Deep Listwise Context Model for Ranking Refinement. InThe 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2018, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, July 08-12, 2018, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Qiaozhu Mei, Brian D. Davison, Yiqun Liu, and Emine Yilmaz (...

    work page doi:10.1145/3209978.3209985 2018

  2. [2]

    Keqin Bao, Jizhi Zhang, Yang Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2023. TALLRec: An Effective and Efficient Tuning Framework to Align Large Language Model with Recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2023, Singapore, Singapore, September 18-22, 2023, Jie Zhang, Li Chen, Shlomo Berkovsky, Min Zhang...

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Irwan Bello, Sayali Kulkarni, Sagar Jain, Craig Boutilier, Ed Huai-hsin Chi, Elad Eban, Xiyang Luo, Alan Mackey, and Ofer Meshi. 2018. Seq2Slate: Re-ranking and Slate Optimization with RNNs.CoRRabs/1810.02019 (2018). arXiv:1810.02019 http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.02019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Junyi Chen, Lu Chi, Bingyue Peng, and Zehuan Yuan. 2024. Hllm: Enhancing sequential recommendations via hierarchical large language models for item and user modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12740(2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep Neural Networks for YouTube Recommendations. InProceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Boston, MA, USA, September 15-19, 2016, Shilad Sen, Werner Geyer, Jill Freyne, and Pablo Castells (Eds.). ACM, 191–198. doi:10.1145/2959100. 2959190

    work page doi:10.1145/2959100 2016

  6. [6]

    Zeyu Cui, Jianxin Ma, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou, and Hongxia Yang. 2022. M6-rec: Generative pretrained language models are open-ended recommender systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08084(2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Marco Cuturi. 2013. Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Opti- mal Transport. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013. Proceed- ings of a meeting held December 5-8, 2013, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States, Christopher J. C. Burges, Léon Bottou, Zoubin Ghahramani,...

    2013

  8. [8]

    Sunhao Dai, Jiakai Tang, Jiahua Wu, Kun Wang, Yuxuan Zhu, Bingjun Chen, Bangyang Hong, Yu Zhao, Cong Fu, Kangle Wu, et al. 2025. Onepiece: Bringing context engineering and reasoning to industrial cascade ranking system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.18091(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Jiaxin Deng, Shiyao Wang, Kuo Cai, Lejian Ren, Qigen Hu, Weifeng Ding, Qiang Luo, and Guorui Zhou. 2025. Onerec: Unifying retrieve and rank with generative recommender and iterative preference alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18965 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Yufei Feng, Yu Gong, Fei Sun, Junfeng Ge, and Wenwu Ou. 2021. Revisit recom- mender system in the permutation prospective.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12057 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Kairui Fu, Tao Zhang, Shuwen Xiao, Ziyang Wang, Xinming Zhang, Chenchi Zhang, Yuliang Yan, Junjun Zheng, Yu Li, Zhihong Chen, Jian Wu, Xiangheng Kong, Shengyu Zhang, Kun Kuang, Yu-Gang Jiang, and Bo Zheng. 2025. FORGE: Forming Semantic Identifiers for Generative Retrieval in Industrial Datasets. CoRRabs/2509.20904 (2025). arXiv:2509.20904 doi:10.48550/ARX...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.20904 2025

  12. [12]

    Shane Culpepper

    Luke Gallagher, Ruey-Cheng Chen, Roi Blanco, and J. Shane Culpepper. 2019. Joint Optimization of Cascade Ranking Models. InProceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2019, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, February 11-15, 2019, J. Shane Culpepper, Alistair Moffat, Paul N. Bennett, and Kristina Lerman (Eds.). ACM, ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3289600.3290986 2019

  13. [13]

    Shijie Geng, Shuchang Liu, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2022. Recommendation as Language Processing (RLP): A Unified Pretrain, Personalized Prompt & Predict Paradigm (P5). InRecSys ’22: Sixteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Seattle, W A, USA, September 18 - 23, 2022, Jennifer Golbeck, F. Maxwell Harper, Vanessa Murdock, Michael ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3523227.3546767 2022

  14. [14]

    Maxwell Harper and Joseph A

    F. Maxwell Harper and Joseph A. Konstan. 2016. The MovieLens Datasets: History and Context.ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst.5, 4 (2016), 19:1–19:19. doi:10.1145/2827872

    work page doi:10.1145/2827872 2016

  15. [15]

    Jingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Qi Han, Daxin Jiang, Xiangyu Zhang, and Heung- Yeung Shum. 2025. Open-reasoner-zero: An open source approach to scaling up reinforcement learning on the base model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.24290 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Yanhua Huang, Yuqi Chen, Xiong Cao, Rui Yang, Mingliang Qi, Yinghao Zhu, Qingchang Han, Yaowei Liu, Zhaoyu Liu, Xuefeng Yao, et al . 2025. Towards Large-scale Generative Ranking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04180(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Guangda Huzhang, Zhen-Jia Pang, Yongqing Gao, Yawen Liu, Weijie Shen, Wen-Ji Zhou, Qianying Lin, Qing Da, Anxiang Zeng, Han Yu, Yang Yu, and Zhi-Hua Zhou

  18. [18]

    AliExpress Learning-to-Rank: Maximizing Online Model Performance Without Going Online.IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.35, 2 (2023), 1214–1226. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2021.3098898

    work page doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3098898 2023

  19. [19]

    Clark Mingxuan Ju, Liam Collins, Leonardo Neves, Bhuvesh Kumar, Louis Yufeng Wang, Tong Zhao, and Neil Shah. 2025. Generative Recommendation with Seman- tic IDs: A Practitioner’s Handbook. InProceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2025, Seoul, Repub- lic of Korea, November 10-14, 2025, Meeyoung Ch...

    work page doi:10.1145/3746252.3761612 2025

  20. [20]

    Xiaoyu Kong, Leheng Sheng, Junfei Tan, Yuxin Chen, Jiancan Wu, An Zhang, Xiang Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2025. MiniOneRec: An Open-Source Frame- work for Scaling Generative Recommendation.CoRRabs/2510.24431 (2025). arXiv:2510.24431 doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2510.24431

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.24431 2025

  21. [21]

    Xiaopeng Li, Bo Chen, Junda She, Shiteng Cao, You Wang, Qinlin Jia, Haiying He, Zheli Zhou, Zhao Liu, Ji Liu, et al. 2025. A Survey of Generative Recommendation from a Tri-Decoupled Perspective: Tokenization, Architecture, and Optimization. (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Jiayi Liao, Sihang Li, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu, Yancheng Yuan, Xiang Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2024. LLaRA: Large Language-Recommendation Assistant. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2024, Washington DC, USA, July 14-18, 2024, Grace Hui Yang, Hongning Wang, Sam Han, Claud...

    work page doi:10.1145/3626772.3657690 2024

  23. [23]

    Xiao Lin, Xiaokai Chen, Chenyang Wang, Hantao Shu, Linfeng Song, Biao Li, and Peng Jiang. 2024. Discrete Conditional Diffusion for Reranking in Rec- ommendation. InCompanion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024, WWW 2024, Singapore, Singapore, May 13-17, 2024, Tat-Seng Chua, Chong-Wah Ngo, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, Ravi Kumar, and Hady W. Lauw (Eds.). ACM,...

    work page doi:10.1145/3589335.3648313 2024

  24. [24]

    Zhijie Lin, Zhuofeng Li, Chenglei Dai, Wentian Bao, Shuai Lin, Enyun Yu, Haox- iang Zhang, and Liang Zhao. 2025. GReF: A Unified Generative Framework for Efficient Reranking via Ordered Multi-token Prediction. InProceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Manage- ment, CIKM 2025, Seoul, Republic of Korea, November 10-...

    work page doi:10.1145/3746252.3761540 2025

  25. [25]

    Qi Liu, Kai Zheng, Rui Huang, Wuchao Li, Kuo Cai, Yuan Chai, Yanan Niu, Yiqun Hui, Bing Han, Na Mou, Hongning Wang, Wentian Bao, Yunen Yu, Guorui Zhou, Han Li, Yang Song, Defu Lian, and Kun Gai. 2025. RecFlow: An Industrial Full Flow Recommendation Dataset. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April ...

    2025

  26. [26]

    McAuley, Dong Zheng, Peng Jiang, and Kun Gai

    Shuchang Liu, Qingpeng Cai, Zhankui He, Bowen Sun, Julian J. McAuley, Dong Zheng, Peng Jiang, and Kun Gai. 2023. Generative Flow Network for Listwise Recommendation. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowl- edge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2023, Long Beach, CA, USA, August 6- 10, 2023, Ambuj K. Singh, Yizhou Sun, Leman Akoglu, Dimitrio...

    work page doi:10.1145/3580305.3599364 2023

  27. [27]

    Weiwen Liu, Yunjia Xi, Jiarui Qin, Fei Sun, Bo Chen, Weinan Zhang, Rui Zhang, and Ruiming Tang. 2022. Neural Re-ranking in Multi-stage Recommender Sys- tems: A Review. InProceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23-29 July 2022, Luc De Raedt (Ed.). ijcai.org, 5512–5520. doi:10.2...

    work page doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/771 2022

  28. [28]

    Zichen Liu, Changyu Chen, Wenjun Li, Penghui Qi, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Wee Sun Lee, and Min Lin. 2025. Understanding r1-zero-like training: A critical perspective.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20783(2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. 2019. Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization. In7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Or- leans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum? id=Bkg6RiCqY7

    2019

  30. [30]

    Wenyu Mao, Shuchang Liu, Hailan Yang, Xiaobei Wang, Xiaoyu Yang, Xu Gao, Xiang Li, Lantao Hu, Han Li, Kun Gai, et al. 2025. Denoising Neural Reranker for Recommender Systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.18736(2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    McAuley, Christopher Targett, Qinfeng Shi, and Anton van den Hengel

    Julian J. McAuley, Christopher Targett, Qinfeng Shi, and Anton van den Hengel

  32. [32]

    Image-Based Recommendations on Styles and Substitutes. InProceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Santiago, Chile, August 9-13, 2015, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Mounia Lalmas, Alistair Moffat, and Berthier A. Ribeiro-Neto (Eds.). ACM, 43–52. doi:10.1145/2766462.2767755

    work page doi:10.1145/2766462.2767755 2015

  33. [33]

    Yue Meng, Cheng Guo, Yi Cao, Tong Liu, and Bo Zheng. 2025. A Generative Re-ranking Model for List-level Multi-objective Optimization at Taobao. InPro- ceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Develop- ment in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2025, Padua, Italy, July 13-18, 2025, Nicola Ferro, Maria Maistro, Gabriella Pasi, Omar ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3726302.3731935 2025

  34. [34]

    Hall, Daniel Cer, and Yinfei Yang

    Jianmo Ni, Gustavo Hernández Ábrego, Noah Constant, Ji Ma, Keith B. Hall, Daniel Cer, and Yinfei Yang. 2022. Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from ���������� ������� ���� ���� ������ ����� ���������� �� ��� �� ��� Pre-trained Text-to-Text Models. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, Dublin, Ireland, May 22-27, 2022...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.146 2022

  35. [35]

    Changhua Pei, Yi Zhang, Yongfeng Zhang, Fei Sun, Xiao Lin, Hanxiao Sun, Jian Wu, Peng Jiang, Junfeng Ge, Wenwu Ou, and Dan Pei. 2019. Personalized re-ranking for recommendation. InProceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 16-20, 2019, Toine Bogers, Alan Said, Peter Brusilovsky, and Domonkos ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3298689.3347000 2019

  36. [36]

    Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020. Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer.J. Mach. Learn. Res.21 (2020), 140:1–140:67. https://jmlr.org/papers/v21/20-074.html

    2020

  37. [37]

    Tran, Jonah Samost, Maciej Kula, Ed H

    Shashank Rajput, Nikhil Mehta, Anima Singh, Raghunandan Hulikal Kesha- van, Trung Vu, Lukasz Heldt, Lichan Hong, Yi Tay, Vinh Q. Tran, Jonah Samost, Maciej Kula, Ed H. Chi, and Mahesh Sathiamoorthy. 2023. Rec- ommender Systems with Generative Retrieval. InAdvances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Pro- ...

    2023

  38. [38]

    Yuxin Ren, Qiya Yang, Yichun Wu, Wei Xu, Yalong Wang, and Zhiqiang Zhang

  39. [39]

    Non-autoregressive Generative Models for Reranking Recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2024, Barcelona, Spain, August 25-29, 2024, Ricardo Baeza-Yates and Francesco Bonchi (Eds.). ACM, 5625–5634. doi:10.1145/3637528.3671645

    work page doi:10.1145/3637528.3671645 2024

  40. [40]

    Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Yang Wu, et al. 2024. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300(2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Xiaowen Shi, Fan Yang, Ze Wang, Xiaoxu Wu, Muzhi Guan, Guogang Liao, Yongkang Wang, Xingxing Wang, and Dong Wang. 2023. PIER: Permutation-Level Interest-Based End-to-End Re-ranking Framework in E-commerce. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2023, Long Beach, CA, USA, August 6-10, 2023, Ambuj K. Sing...

    work page doi:10.1145/3580305.3599886 2023

  42. [42]

    Shuli Wang, Xue Wei, Senjie Kou, Chi Wang, Wenshuai Chen, Qi Tang, Yinhua Zhu, Xiong Xiao, and Xingxing Wang. 2025. NLGR: Utilizing Neighbor Lists for Generative Rerank in Personalized Recommendation Systems. InCompanion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, WWW 2025, Sydney, NSW, Aus- tralia, 28 April 2025 - 2 May 2025, Guodong Long, Michale Blu...

    work page doi:10.1145/3701716.3715251 2025

  43. [43]

    Wenjie Wang, Honghui Bao, Xinyu Lin, Jizhi Zhang, Yongqi Li, Fuli Feng, See- Kiong Ng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2024. Learnable Item Tokenization for Generative Recommendation. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2024, Boise, ID, USA, October 21-25, 2024, Edoardo Serra and Francesca Spezzano (Eds....

    work page doi:10.1145/3627673.3679569 2024

  44. [44]

    Yunjia Xi, Weiwen Liu, Jieming Zhu, Xilong Zhao, Xinyi Dai, Ruiming Tang, Weinan Zhang, Rui Zhang, and Yong Yu. 2022. Multi-Level Interaction Reranking with User Behavior History. InSIGIR ’22: The 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Madrid, Spain, July 11 - 15, 2022, Enrique Amigó, Pablo Castells, ...

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Hailan Yang, Zhenyu Qi, Shuchang Liu, Xiaoyu Yang, Xiaobei Wang, Xiang Li, Lantao Hu, Han Li, and Kun Gai. 2025. Comprehensive List Generation for Multi-Generator Reranking. InProceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2025, Padua, Italy, July 13-18, 2025, Nicola Ferro, Maria Mais...

    work page doi:10.1145/3726302.3729933 2025

  46. [46]

    Qiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan, Xiaochen Zuo, Yu Yue, Weinan Dai, Tiantian Fan, Gaohong Liu, Lingjun Liu, et al. 2025. Dapo: An open- source llm reinforcement learning system at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Jiaqi Zhai, Lucy Liao, Xing Liu, Yueming Wang, Rui Li, Xuan Cao, Leon Gao, Zhaojie Gong, Fangda Gu, Jiayuan He, Yinghai Lu, and Yu Shi. 2024. Actions Speak Louder than Words: Trillion-Parameter Sequential Transducers for Generative Recommendations. InForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. Op...

    2024

  48. [48]

    Kaike Zhang, Xiaobei Wang, Shuchang Liu, Hailan Yang, Xiang Li, Lantao Hu, Han Li, Qi Cao, Fei Sun, and Kun Gai. 2025. GoalRank: Group-Relative Optimiza- tion for a Large Ranking Model.CoRRabs/2509.22046 (2025). arXiv:2509.22046 doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2509.22046

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.22046 2025

  49. [49]

    Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Dingkun Long, Xin Zhang, Huan Lin, Baosong Yang, Pengjun Xie, An Yang, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin, Fei Huang, and Jingren Zhou

  50. [50]

    Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05176(2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Kesen Zhao, Shuchang Liu, Qingpeng Cai, Xiangyu Zhao, Ziru Liu, Dong Zheng, Peng Jiang, and Kun Gai. 2023. KuaiSim: A Comprehensive Sim- ulator for Recommender Systems. InAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Sys- tems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA, December 10 - 16, 2023, Ali...

    2023

  52. [52]

    Bowen Zheng, Yupeng Hou, Hongyu Lu, Yu Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ming Chen, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2024. Adapting Large Language Models by Integrating Col- laborative Semantics for Recommendation. In40th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2024, Utrecht, The Netherlands, May 13-16, 2024. IEEE, 1435–1448. doi:10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00118

    work page doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00118 2024

  53. [53]

    Guorui Zhou, Jiaxin Deng, Jinghao Zhang, Kuo Cai, Lejian Ren, Qiang Luo, Qian- qian Wang, Qigen Hu, Rui Huang, Shiyao Wang, et al. 2025. OneRec Technical Report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13695(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Guorui Zhou, Hengrui Hu, Hongtao Cheng, Huanjie Wang, Jiaxin Deng, Jinghao Zhang, Kuo Cai, Lejian Ren, Lu Ren, Liao Yu, Pengfei Zheng, Qiang Luo, Qianqian Wang, Qigen Hu, Rui Huang, Ruiming Tang, Shiyao Wang, Shujie Yang, Tao Wu, Wuchao Li, Xinchen Luo, Xingmei Wang, Yi Su, Yunfan Wu, Zexuan Cheng, Zhanyu Liu, Zixing Zhang, Bin Zhang, Boxuan Wang, Chaoyi ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20900 2025