pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25910 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🪐 quant-ph

Heralding probability optimization for nonclassical light generated by photon counting measurements on multimode Gaussian states

Jarom\'ir Fiur\'a\v{s}ek This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords heralding probabilityGaussian statesphoton countingnonclassical lightquantum state preparationpolynomial equationsFock statessqueezed light
0
0 comments X

The pith

Maximizing the heralding probability for nonclassical states prepared from multimode Gaussian light reduces to solving a system of polynomial equations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that conditional preparation of nonclassical light by photon counting on multimode Gaussian states turns the problem of maximizing heralding probability into the task of solving a system of polynomial equations. This algebraic reformulation supports efficient numerical search for the best configuration and naturally incorporates realistic limits on the available quadrature squeezing. The work concentrates on generating finite superpositions of Fock states from input states with zero coherent displacement, which guarantees that the output states have definite photon-number parity. The approach is illustrated for single-mode and two-mode target states heralded by measurements on two auxiliary modes and can be extended to squeezed superpositions of Fock states.

Core claim

For conditional quantum-state preparation schemes that rely on Gaussian states and photon-number measurements, the maximization of the heralding probability can be formulated as finding the solution to a system of polynomial equations. This offers an efficient route to the optimal configuration, permits the direct inclusion of bounds on single-mode quadrature squeezing, and allows the use of specialized polynomial-system solvers. The analysis is restricted to Gaussian states with vanishing coherent displacements so that the conditionally prepared states possess well-defined photon-number parity. Concrete examples cover the generation of single-mode and two-mode states using two heralding (ph

What carries the argument

The system of polynomial equations obtained by expressing the heralding probability as a function of the parameters of the multimode Gaussian state under photon-counting conditions.

If this is right

  • Optimal squeezing and beam-splitter parameters for a given target state can be located efficiently even when single-mode squeezing is bounded by experimental limits.
  • The same polynomial formulation applies directly to the preparation of single-mode and two-mode superpositions of Fock states heralded by two auxiliary modes.
  • The method extends without change to the generation of squeezed superpositions of Fock states.
  • Higher heralding probabilities translate into higher state-preparation rates when experiments move to detection of larger photon numbers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Specialized polynomial solvers could be coupled to real-time feedback in optical setups to adjust parameters on the fly.
  • Similar algebraic reformulations might apply to other conditional preparation protocols that use Gaussian resources and number-resolved detection.
  • The parity constraint restricts the reachable states; relaxing it would require a more general optimization that drops the zero-displacement assumption.

Load-bearing premise

The input states are multimode Gaussian with vanishing coherent displacements, allowing the heralding probability to be written as a polynomial in the state parameters.

What would settle it

A direct numerical or experimental maximization of the heralding probability for a concrete multimode Gaussian state and photon-counting pattern that yields a higher value than any root of the corresponding polynomial system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25910 by Jarom\'ir Fiur\'a\v{s}ek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Scheme for generation of single-mode nonclassical state of light view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Scheme for generation of single-mode squeezed superpositions of Fock states. The state generated from Gaussian core view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Results of maximization of the heralding probability view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Dependence of the heralding probability view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Maximum heralding probability for target state view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Optimal heralding probability view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Generation of highly non-classical quantum states of light is essential for optical quantum information processing and quantum metrology. Given the lack of sufficiently strong nonlinear interactions between optical fields, the commonly employed optical quantum-state preparation schemes are conditional, based on nonlinearity induced by heralding photon number measurement on a part of a multimode squeezed Gaussian state. Development and optimization of such probabilistic quantum-state engineering schemes represents one of the central challenges in current quantum optics. As technology advances and experiments progress to detection of higher numbers of photons, the maximization of the heralding probability becomes essential to ensure sufficiently high state-preparation rates. Here, we show that for the conditional quantum state preparation schemes based on Gaussian states and photon number measurements the maximization of the heralding probability can be formulated as finding solution to a system of polynomial equations, which offers an efficient way to find the optimal configuration and allows us to apply techniques dedicated specifically to solving such systems of equations. Our approach can seamlessly incorporate bounds on the available single-mode quadrature squeezing, which is highly experimentally relevant. We mainly consider generation of finite superpositions of Fock states but show that the approach can be straightforwardly extended to generation of squeezed superpositions of Fock states. We focus on Gaussian states with vanishing coherent displacements, hence the conditionally generated states have well defined photon number parity. We illustrate our general methodology on examples of generation of single-mode and two-mode states with two heralding modes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims that for conditional preparation of nonclassical states (finite Fock superpositions or squeezed variants) from multimode zero-displacement Gaussian states via photon-number heralding, maximization of the heralding probability reduces to solving a system of polynomial equations in suitably chosen state parameters. This formulation permits direct incorporation of bounds on single-mode quadrature squeezing and is illustrated explicitly for single-mode and two-mode targets using two heralding modes.

Significance. If the reduction to polynomial equations is valid, the work supplies a systematic algebraic route to optimal heralding configurations that scales better than brute-force numerical search and directly respects experimental squeezing limits. This is practically relevant for raising preparation rates in quantum optics as photon-number-resolving detectors improve, and the parity-preserving zero-displacement restriction plus the extension to squeezed Fock states are cleanly stated.

minor comments (4)
  1. §2.2 and Eq. (8): the transition from the covariance-matrix expression for the heralding probability to the explicit polynomial form after clearing denominators should be written out for the two-mode example; the current sketch leaves the variable substitution implicit.
  2. Figure 2 caption and surrounding text: the plotted probability surfaces are not labeled with the specific squeezing bounds used; adding the numerical values of the constraints would make the comparison with the unconstrained optimum immediate.
  3. §4.1: the statement that the method 'seamlessly incorporates' squeezing bounds would be strengthened by showing the modified polynomial system (or the Lagrange-multiplier equations) for at least one low-dimensional case.
  4. Reference list: several standard works on Gaussian-state conditional preparation (e.g., on parity and photon-number heralding) are cited only in passing; adding one or two explicit comparisons of numerical efficiency would help readers gauge the practical gain.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the recognition of its practical relevance for quantum-state preparation, and the recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the reduction to a system of polynomial equations is viewed as a systematic and scalable approach.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a direct mathematical reformulation

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that heralding-probability maximization for zero-displacement multimode Gaussian states under photon-number measurements reduces to solving a system of polynomial equations in the state parameters. This follows directly from the explicit form of the heralding probability (derived from the covariance matrix or symplectic parameters of the Gaussian state) being a rational function that becomes polynomial after clearing denominators when setting the gradient to zero. The restriction to vanishing displacements ensures definite parity and polynomial structure, which is a standard consequence in quantum optics rather than a self-referential definition. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are present in the derivation chain. The approach is illustrated on low-mode examples with explicit constructions, confirming it is self-contained against external benchmarks like standard Gaussian-state formalism. Overall circularity score remains 0 as the result is not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on established domain assumptions in quantum optics regarding Gaussian states and measurements. No new free parameters are introduced, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gaussian states are fully characterized by their first and second moments, and photon number measurements on them lead to conditional non-Gaussian states.
    This is a standard assumption in quantum optics for heralded state preparation schemes.
  • domain assumption The heralding probability is a function of the squeezing parameters and other state parameters that can be expressed polynomially.
    This enables the formulation as a system of polynomial equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1283 out tokens · 90024 ms · 2026-05-07T16:29:37.281150+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    listopadu 12, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic Generation of highly non-classical quantum states of light is essential for optical quantum informa- tion processing and quantum metrology. Given the lack of sufficiently strong nonlinear interactions between optical fields, the commonly employed optical quantum-state preparation schemes are con- ditional, based...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    A. I. Lvovsky, H. Hansen, T. Aichele, O. Benson, J. Mlynek, and S. Schiller, Quantum State Reconstruction of the Single-Photon Fock State, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 050402 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Cooper, L

    M. Cooper, L. J. Wright, C. S¨ oller, and B. J. Smith, Experimental generation of multi-photon fock states, Opt. Express 21, 5309 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Bouillard, G

    M. Bouillard, G. Boucher, J. F. Ortas, B. Kanseri, and R. Tualle-Brouri, High production rate of single-photon and two-photon fock states for quantum state engineering, Opt. Express27, 3113 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Kawasaki, K

    A. Kawasaki, K. Takase, T. Nomura, S. Miki, H. Terai, M. Yabuno, F. China, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, J.-i. Yoshikawaet al., Generation of highly pure single-photon state at telecommunication wavelength, Opt. Express30, 24831 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Takase, K

    K. Takase, K. Fukui, A. Kawasaki, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, J.-i. Yoshikawa, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Gottesman- Kitaev-Preskill qubit synthesizer for propagating light, npj Quantum Inf.9, 98 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Konno, W

    S. Konno, W. Asavanant, F. Hanamura, H. Nagayoshi, K. Fukui, A. Sakaguchi, R. Ide, F. China, M. Yabuno, S. Miki, H. Terai, K. Takase, M. Endo, P. Marek, R. Filip, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light, Science383, 289 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    M. V. Larsen, J. E. Bourassa, S. Kocsis, J. F. Tasker, R. S. Chadwick, C. Gonz´ alez-Arciniegas, J. Hastrup, C. E. Lopetegui- Gonz´ alez, F. M. Miatto, A. Motamedi, R. Noro, G. Roeland, R. Baby, H. Chen, P. Contu, I. Di Luch, C. Drago, M. Giesbrecht, T. Grainge, I. Krasnokutska, M. Menotti, B. Morrison, C. Puviraj, K. Rezaei Shad, B. Hussain, J. McMahon, ...

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Ourjoumtsev, R

    A. Ourjoumtsev, R. Tualle-Brouri, J. Laurat, and P. Grangier, Generating optical Schr¨ odinger kittens for quantum infor- mation processing, Science312, 83 (2006)

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, B. M. Nielsen, C. Hettich, K. Molmer, and E. S. Polzik, Generation of a superposition of odd photon number states for quantum information networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 083604 (2006)

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    Alexei Ourjoumtsev, Hyunseok Jeong, Rosa Tualle-Brouri and Philippe Grangier, Generation of optical ‘Schr¨ odinger cats’ from photon number states, Nature448, 784 (2007)

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Wakui, H

    K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, Photon subtracted squeezed states generated with periodically poled KTiOPO4, Opt. Express15, 3568 (2007)

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Takahashi, K

    H. Takahashi, K. Wakui, S. Suzuki, M. Takeoka, K. Hayasaka, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, Generation of large-amplitude coherent-state superposition via ancilla-assisted photon subtraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 233605 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Yukawa, K

    M. Yukawa, K. Miyata, T. Mizuta, H. Yonezawa, P. Marek, R. Filip, and A. Furusawa, Generating superposition of up-to three photons for continuous variable quantum information processing, Opt. Express21, 5529 (2013). 16

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Huang, H

    K. Huang, H. Le Jeannic, J. Ruaudel, V. B. Verma, M. D. Shaw, F. Marsili, S. W. Nam, E Wu, H. Zeng, Y.-C. Jeong, R. Filip, O. Morin, and J. Laurat, Optical synthesis of large-amplitude squeezed coherent-state superpositions with minimal resources, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 023602 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    D. V. Sychev, A. E. Ulanov, A. A. Pushkina, M. W. Richards, I. A. Fedorov, and A. I. Lvovsky, Enlargement of optical Schr¨ odinger’s cat states, Nat. Photonics11, 379 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Etesse, M

    J. Etesse, M. Bouillard, B. Kanseri, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Experimental Generation of Squeezed Cat States with an Operation Allowing Iterative Growth, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 193602 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Cotte, H

    V. Cotte, H. Simon, B. Pointard, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Experimental generation of coherent-state superpositions with a quantum memory, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043170 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Simon, L

    H. Simon, L. Caron, R. Journet, V. Cotte, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Experimental Demonstration of a Versatile and Scalable Scheme for Iterative Generation of Non-Gaussian States of Light, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 173603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    M. Endo, T. Nomura, T. Sonoyama, K. Takahashi, S. Takasu, D. Fukuda, T. Kashiwazaki, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, R. Nehra, P. Marek, R. Filip, K. Takase, W. Asavanant, and A. Furusawa, High-Rate Four Photon Subtraction from Squeezed Vacuum: Preparing Cat State for Optical Quantum Computation, arXiv:2502.08952 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    S. Yu, J. Sun, K.-C. Chen, Z.-H. Yang, Z. Li, E. Mer, Y. K. Alwehaibi, S. H. Winston, D. Marcus D. Lopena, Z.-C. Zhang, G. Yang, R. Tao, M. Zhou, G. J. Machado, Y. Dong, R. Bondesan, V. Vedral, M. S. Kim, I. A. Walmsley, and R. B. Patel, Extensible universal photonic quantum computing with nonlinearity, arXiv:2602.06544

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Konno, A

    S. Konno, A. Sakaguchi, W. Asavanant, H.i Ogawa, M. Kobayashi, P. Marek, R. Filip, J.-I. Yoshikawa, and A. Furusawa, Nonlinear Squeezing for Measurement-Based Non-Gaussian Operations in Time Domain, Phys. Rev. Applied15, 024024 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    V. Kala, J. Fadrn´ y, M. Neset, J. B´ ılek, P. Marek, and M. Jeˇ zek, Genuine Continuous Quantumness, arXiv:2503.07574 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

    work page 2001

  25. [25]

    T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, and G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy, Quantum computation with optical coherent states,, Phys. Rev. A68, 042319 (2003)

    work page 2003

  26. [26]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd and L. Maccone, Advances in Quantum Metrology, Nature Photonics5, 222 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Pirandola, B

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nat. Photonics12, 724 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    V. V. Albert, K. Noh, K. Duivenvoorden, D. J. Young, R. T. Brierley, P. Reinhold, C. Vuillot, L. Li, C. Shen, S. M. Girvin, B. M. Terhal and L. Jiang, Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. A97, 032346 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Guillaud and M

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Repetition Cat Qubits for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation, Phys. Rev. X9, 041053 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Tzitrin, T

    I. Tzitrin, T. Matsuura, R. N. Alexander, G. Dauphinais, J. E. Bourassa, K. K. Sabapathy, N. C. Menicucci, and I. Dhand, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Static Linear Optics, PRX Quantum2, 040353 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    D. S. Schlegel, F. Minganti, and V. Savona, Quantum error correction using squeezed Schr¨ odinger cat states, Phys. Rev. A106, 022431 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    A. J. Brady, A. Eickbusch, S. Singh, J. Wu, and Q. Zhuang, Advances in bosonic quantum error correction with Gottes- man–Kitaev–Preskill Codes: Theory, engineering and applications, Progress in Quantum Electronics93, 100496 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    P. T. Grochowski and R. Filip, Optimal Phase-Insensitive Force Sensing with Non-Gaussian States, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 230802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Walschaers, Non-Gaussian Quantum States and Where to Find Them, PRX Quantum2, 030204 (2021)

    M. Walschaers, Non-Gaussian Quantum States and Where to Find Them, PRX Quantum2, 030204 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    A. I. Lvovsky, P. Grangier, A. Ourjoumtsev, V. Parigi, M. Sasaki, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Production and applications of non-Gaussian quantum states of light, arXiv:2006.16985 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2006

  36. [36]

    A. P. Lund, A. Laing, S. Rahimi-Keshari, T. Rudolph, J. L. O’Brien, and T. C. Ralph, Boson Sampling from a Gaussian State, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 100502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    C. S. Hamilton, R. Kruse, L. Sansoni, S. Barkhofen, C. Silberhorn, and I. Jex, Gaussian Boson Sampling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 170501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Paesani, Y

    S. Paesani, Y. Ding, R. Santagati, L. Chakhmakhchyan, Ca. Vigliar, K. Rottwitt, L. K. Oxenløwe, J. Wang, M. G. Thompson, and A. Laing, Generation and sampling of quantum states of light in a silicon chip, Nature Physics15, 925 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Zhong, H

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu, P. Hu, X.-Y. Yang, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Li, X. Jiang, L. Gan , G. Yang, L. You, Z. Wang, L. Li , N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum computational advantage using photons, Science370, 1460 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Zhong, Y.-H

    H.-S. Zhong, Y.-H. Deng, J. Qin, H. Wang, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, D. Wu, S.-Q. Gong, H. Su, Y. Hu, P. Hu, X.-Y. Yang, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Li, X. Jiang, L. Gan, G. Yang, L. You, Z, Wang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, J. J. Renema, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Phase-Programmable Gaussian Boson Sampling Using Stimulated Squeezed Light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 18...

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Thekkadath, S

    G.S. Thekkadath, S. Sempere-Llagostera, B.A. Bell, R.B. Patel, M.S. Kim, and I.A. Walmsley, Experimental Demonstration of Gaussian Boson Sampling with Displacement, PRX Quantum3, 020336 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Zavatta, S

    A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, Quantum-to-Classical Transition with Single-Photon-Added Coherent States of Light, Science306, 660 (2004)

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, M. Takeuchi, K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, K. Hayasaka, M. Takeoka, and M. Sasaki, Optical continuous-variable qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 053602 (2010). 17

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Fadrn´ y, M

    J. Fadrn´ y, M. Neset, M. Bielak, M. Jeˇ zek, J. B´ ılek, and J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, Experimental preparation of multiphoton-added coherent states of light, npj Quantum Inf.10, 89 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Chen, H.-Y

    Y.-R. Chen, H.-Y. Hsieh, J. Ning, H.-C. Wu, H. L. Chen, Z.-H. Shi, P. Yang, O. Steuernagel, C.-M. Wu, and R.-K. Lee, Generation of heralded optical cat states by photon addition, Phys. Rev. A110, 023703 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Tomoda, A

    H. Tomoda, A. Machinaga, K. Takase, J. Harada, T. Kashiwazaki, T.i Umeki, S. Miki, F. China, M. Yabuno, H. Terai, D. Okuno, and S. Takeda, Boosting the generation rate of squeezed single-photon states by generalized photon subtraction, Phys. Rev. A110, 033717 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Takase, F

    K. Takase, F. Hanamura, H. Nagayoshi, J. E. Bourassa, R. N. Alexander, A. Kawasaki, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Generation of flying logical qubits using generalized photon subtraction with adaptive Gaussian operations, Phys. Rev. A110, 012436 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    D. Su, C. R. Myers, and K. K. Sabapathy, Conversion of Gaussian states to non-Gaussian states using photon-number- resolving detectors, Phys. Rev. A100, 052301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Mogyorosi, P

    G. Mogyorosi, P. Adam, E. Molnar, and M Mechler, Single-step quantum state engineering in traveling optical fields, Phys. Rev. A100, 013851 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Beyond Stellar Rank: Control Parameters for Scalable Optical Non-Gaussian State Generation

    F. Hanamura, K. Takase, H. Nagayoshi, R. Ide, W. Asavanant, K. Fukui, P. Marek, R. Filip, and A. Furusawa, Beyond Stellar Rank: Control Parameters for Scalable Optical Non-Gaussian State Generation, arXiv:2509.06255

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Maximum heralding probabilities of nonclassical-state generation from a two-mode Gaussian state via photon-counting measurements

    J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, Maximum heralding probabilities of non-classical state generation from two-mode Gaussian state via photon counting measurements, arXiv:2510.01951

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  52. [52]

    Notarnicola, M

    M N. Notarnicola, M. Jarzyna, and R Filip, Deterministic feedforward-based generation of large optical coherent-state superposition, arXiv:2603.22068

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Takase, M

    K. Takase, M. Endo, F. Hanamura, K. Hirota, M. Yabuno, H. Terai, S. Miki, T. Kashiwazaki, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, P. Marek, R. Filip, W. Asavanant, and A. Furusawa, Tuning Wave-Particle Duality of Quantum Light by Generalized Photon Subtraction, arXiv:2602.21629

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Motamedi, Y

    A. Motamedi, Y. Yao, K. Nielsen, U. Chabaud, J. E. Bourassa, R. N. Alexander, and F. Miatto, The stellar decomposition of Gaussian quantum states, Quantum10, 1971 (2026)

    work page 1971

  55. [55]

    S. L. Braunstein, Squeezing as an irreducible resource, Phys. Rev. A71, 055801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    A Vourdas, Analytic representations in quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.39, R65 (2006)

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    Chabaud, D

    U. Chabaud, D. Markham, and F. Grosshans, Stellar Representation of Non-Gaussian Quantum States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 063605 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Lachman, I

    L. Lachman, I. Straka, J. Hlouˇ sek, M. Jeˇ zek, and R. Filip, Faithful Hierarchy of Genuine n-Photon Quantum Non-Gaussian Light, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 043601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Chabaud, G

    U. Chabaud, G. Roeland, M. Walschaers, F. Grosshans, V. Parigi, D. Markham, and N. Treps, Certification of Non- Gaussian States with Operational Measurements, PRX Quantum2, 020333 (2021); PRX Quantum6, 010902 (2025)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Vahlbruch, M

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Detection of 15 dB Squeezed States of Light and their Application for the Absolute Calibration of Photoelectric Quantum Efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 110801 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    G. Ha, K. Hirota, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Suzuki, A. Kawasaki, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Generation of 12 dB squeezed light from a waveguide optical parametric amplifier using a machine-learning-controlled spatial light modulator, arXiv:2603.02744

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Fiur´ aˇ sek, R

    J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, and N. J. Cerf, Conditional generation of arbitrary single-mode quantum states of light by repeated photon subtractions, Phys. Rev. A 72, 033822 (2005)

    work page 2005

  63. [63]

    Marek, H

    P. Marek, H. Jeong, and M. S. Kim, Generating ”squeezed” superpositions of coherent states using photon addition and subtraction, Phys. Rev. A 78, 063811 (2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    A. P. Lund and T. C. Ralph, Nondeterministic gates for photonic single-rail quantum logic, Phys. Rev. A66, 032307 (2002)

    work page 2002