Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 1 cited by

The frame potential of a disordered Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid has a closed-form expression showing power-law decay at early times followed by saturation to a plateau set by one coupling parameter.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-05-07 16:11 UTC

load-bearing objection This paper gives the first closed-form frame potential for a disordered Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid by keeping the averaged Keldysh action quadratic, and the derivation holds without obvious holes.

arxiv 2604.25995 v1 submitted 2026-04-28 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

Solvable Random Unitary Dynamics in a Disordered Tomonaga-Luttinger Liquid

Tian-Gang Zhou , Thierry Giamarchi This is my paper
classification quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords frame potentialTomonaga-Luttinger liquidquenched disorderKeldysh actionXXZ spin chainunitary dynamicsquantum informationgapless phase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an exact formula for the frame potential in a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid with quenched Gaussian forward-scattering disorder by using the quadratic structure of the disorder-averaged Keldysh action. This formula reveals that the frame potential decays as a power law early on and then levels off to a late-time value fixed by a single coupling. The result is demonstrated for the random-field XXZ spin chain, where randomness is strongest near the Heisenberg ferromagnetic point and can be boosted exponentially with repeated quenches. The approach covers the full gapless phase and links to practical diagnostics for quantum algorithms in analog simulation platforms.

Core claim

We derive a closed-form expression for the frame potential of a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid with quenched Gaussian forward-scattering disorder. Exploiting the exactly quadratic structure of the disorder-averaged Keldysh action, we show that the frame potential decays as a power law at early times and saturates to a late-time plateau controlled by a single coupling parameter. Taking the random field XXZ spin chain as a specific microscopic realization, we show that the strongest randomness is achieved near the Heisenberg ferromagnetic point and can be exponentially enhanced through a multiple-quench protocol, with validation across the gapless phase.

What carries the argument

The exactly quadratic disorder-averaged Keldysh action, which enables direct closed-form computation of the frame potential for the unitary dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The disorder-averaged Keldysh action remains exactly quadratic for the chosen Gaussian forward-scattering disorder.

What would settle it

An experiment or numerical simulation measuring the frame potential versus time in a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid with forward-scattering disorder and finding that it neither follows the predicted early-time power-law decay nor saturates to a plateau set by one coupling parameter would disprove the closed-form result.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a closed-form expression for the frame potential of a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid subject to quenched Gaussian forward-scattering disorder. Exploiting the exactly quadratic structure of the disorder-averaged Keldysh action, the authors show that the frame potential exhibits power-law decay at early times and saturates at late times to a plateau controlled by a single coupling parameter. They illustrate the result with the random-field XXZ chain, identify the Heisenberg ferromagnetic point as maximizing randomness, and discuss a multiple-quench protocol for exponential enhancement, with validation stated across the gapless phase.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies the first analytical treatment of frame potentials in an experimentally accessible interacting one-dimensional system. The exact quadratic solvability of the averaged Keldysh action is a clear strength, yielding closed-form expressions without uncontrolled approximations and enabling falsifiable predictions for quantum-information diagnostics. This has immediate relevance for algorithm design and randomness benchmarking in analog quantum simulators.

minor comments (2)
  1. The single coupling parameter that controls the late-time plateau is central to the result; a brief explicit statement (e.g., in the paragraph following Eq. (X) or in the discussion of the two-point Keldysh correlators) confirming that it is obtained directly from the microscopic disorder variance, independent of any frame-potential data, would eliminate any possible appearance of circularity.
  2. The validation statement in the abstract and conclusion is brief; adding one sentence that specifies the observable or numerical protocol used to confirm the closed-form expression across the gapless phase would improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, recognition of the significance of our results, and recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation begins from the standard quadratic Tomonaga-Luttinger Hamiltonian plus Gaussian forward-scattering disorder. The disorder average produces a non-local quadratic term in the Keldysh action with no higher-order vertices, yielding an exactly solvable Gaussian theory. Frame-potential expressions then follow directly from the resulting two-point correlators on the Keldysh contour. The early-time power-law decay and late-time plateau (controlled by the disorder strength) are computed outputs of this Gaussian theory rather than inputs or self-referential fits. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked to close the argument; the construction is self-contained against the microscopic model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the disorder-averaged Keldysh action remains exactly quadratic under quenched Gaussian forward-scattering disorder, allowing an exact solution. The single coupling parameter that sets the late-time plateau is introduced as a model parameter without independent derivation shown in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • single coupling parameter
    Controls the value of the late-time plateau of the frame potential; its origin and whether it is fitted or derived are not specified in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Exactly quadratic structure of the disorder-averaged Keldysh action
    Invoked to obtain the closed-form expression for the frame potential.
  • domain assumption Quenched Gaussian forward-scattering disorder
    Defines the disorder model for the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5497 in / 1458 out tokens · 73123 ms · 2026-05-07T16:11:07.652340+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Disordered one-dimensional interacting systems have long been characterized via conventional correlation functions. A complementary quantum-information perspective quantifies the randomness of the unitary ensemble dynamics generated by a quantum system through the frame potential, which serves as a practical diagnostic for quantum algorithmic performance. However, no analytical treatment has yet been achieved for experimentally accessible interacting one-dimensional systems. In this Letter, we derive a closed-form expression for the frame potential of a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid with quenched Gaussian forward-scattering disorder. Exploiting the exactly quadratic structure of the disorder-averaged Keldysh action, we show that the frame potential decays as a power law at early times and saturates to a late-time plateau controlled by a single coupling parameter. Taking the random field XXZ spin chain as a specific microscopic realization, we show that the strongest randomness is achieved near the Heisenberg ferromagnetic point and can be exponentially enhanced through a multiple-quench protocol. We validate our results across the entire gapless phase, with direct implications for algorithm design in analog quantum simulation platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25995 by Thierry Giamarchi, Tian-Gang Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Free-fermion benchmark at ∆ = 0 with view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Late-time one-parameter collapse. From the late view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Multiple-quench FP decay with ∆ = 0, view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The illustration of the Keldysh contour for the FP with view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of filter orders view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time dependence of the normalized FP view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unitary $k$-designs without Hamiltonian quenches

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A single fixed chaotic Hamiltonian kicked twice by the same Pauli operator at randomly sampled times yields an approximate unitary k-design whose frame potential reaches the Haar value k! + O(1/d).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Jerome and C

    D. Jerome and C. Bourbonnais, Quasi one-dimensional organic conductors: from Fr¨ ohlich conductivity and Peierls insulating state to magnetically-mediated super- conductivity, a retrospective, Comptes Rendus. Physique 25, 17 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Tarucha, T

    S. Tarucha, T. Saku, Y. Tokura, and Y. Hirayama, Sharvin resistance and its breakdown observed in long ballistic channels, Phys. Rev. B47, 4064 (1993)

    work page 1993

  3. [3]

    O. M. Auslaender, H. Steinberg, A. Yacoby, Y. Tserkovnyak, B. I. Halperin, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Spin-charge separation and localization in one dimension, Science308, 88 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Bockrath, D

    M. Bockrath, D. H. Cobden, J. Lu, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, L. Balents, and P. L. McEuen, Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes, Nature397, 598 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    D. A. Tennant, R. A. Cowley, S. E. Nagler, and A. M. Tsvelik, Measurement of the spin-excitation continuum in one-dimensional KCuF 3 using neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B52, 13368 (1995)

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, One dimensional bosons: From condensed mat- ter systems to ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1405 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Fazio, K.-H

    R. Fazio, K.-H. Wagenblast, C. Winkelholz, and G. Sch¨ on, Tunneling into one-dimensional Josephson chains and Luttinger liquids, Physica B222, 364 (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    L. I. Glazman and A. I. Larkin, New quantum phase in a one-dimensional Josephson array, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 3736 (1997)

    work page 1997

  9. [9]

    Giamarchi and H

    T. Giamarchi and H. J. Schulz, Anderson localization and interactions in one-dimensional metals, Phys. Rev. B37, 325 (1988)

    work page 1988

  10. [10]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension, In- ternational Series of Monographs on Physics, Vol

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension, In- ternational Series of Monographs on Physics, Vol. 121 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Pal and D

    A. Pal and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization phase transition, Phys. Rev. B82, 174411 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019). 6

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of inter- acting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    yoon Choi, S

    J. yoon Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio- Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science352, 1547 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Collins and P

    B. Collins and P. ´Sniady, Integration with Respect to the Haar Measure on Unitary, Orthogonal and Symplectic Group, Commun. Math. Phys.264, 773 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    A. J. Scott, Optimizing quantum process tomography with unitary2-designs, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 055308 (2008)

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Vermersch, A

    B. Vermersch, A. Elben, L. M. Sieberer, N. Y. Yao, and P. Zoller, Probing scrambling using statistical correla- tions between randomized measurements, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021061 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Y.-N. Zhou, R. L¨ owenberg, and J. Sonner, Realizing Uni- taryk-designs with a Single Quench (2025), 2511.13829

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    A. W. Harrow and R. A. Low, Random quantum circuits are approximate 2-designs, Commun. Math. Phys.291, 257 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, A. W. Harrow, and M. Horodecki, Local random quantum circuits are approximate polynomial-designs, Commun. Math. Phys.346, 397 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Haferkamp, Random quantum circuits are approxi- mate unitaryt-designs in depthO(nt 5+o(1)), Quantum 6, 795 (2022)

    J. Haferkamp, Random quantum circuits are approxi- mate unitaryt-designs in depthO(nt 5+o(1)), Quantum 6, 795 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Schuster, J

    T. Schuster, J. Haferkamp, and H.-Y. Huang, Random unitaries in extremely low depth, Science389, 92 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Nakata, C

    Y. Nakata, C. Hirche, M. Koashi, and A. Winter, Ef- ficient quantum pseudorandomness with nearly time- independent hamiltonian dynamics, Phys. Rev. X7, 021006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Onorati, O

    E. Onorati, O. Buerschaper, M. Kliesch, W. Brown, A. H. Werner, and J. Eisert, Mixing properties of stochastic quantum hamiltonians, Commun. Math. Phys.355, 905 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    L. Cui, T. Schuster, L. Mao, H.-Y. Huang, and F. Brandao, Random unitaries from hamiltonian dynam- ics (2025), arXiv:2510.08434 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993)

    work page 1993

  27. [27]

    Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, Talks at KITP, University of California, Santa Barbara (2015), accessed 2025-10-16

    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, Talks at KITP, University of California, Santa Barbara (2015), accessed 2025-10-16

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the sachdev– ye–kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D94, 106002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Cotler, N

    J. Cotler, N. Hunter-Jones, J. Liu, and B. Yoshida, Chaos, complexity, and random matrices, J. High Energy Phys.2017(11)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Gharibyan, M

    H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, S. H. Shenker, and M. Tezuka, Onset of random matrix behavior in scrambling systems, J. High Energy Phys.2018(7)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    S.-K. Jian, G. S. Bentsen, and B. Swingle, Linear growth of circuit complexity from brownian dynamics, J. High Energy Phys.2023(08), 190

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Tiutiakina, A

    A. Tiutiakina, A. D. Luca, and J. de Nardis, Frame po- tential of brownian syk model of majorana and dirac fermions, J. High Energy Phys.2024(01), 115

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Evenly dis- tributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary de- signs,

    D. Gross, K. Audenaert, and J. Eisert, Evenly distributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs, J. Math. Phys.48, 10.1063/1.2716992 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2716992 2007

  34. [34]

    D. A. Roberts and B. Yoshida, Chaos and complexity by design, J. High Energy Phys.2017(4)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    (A) The Keldysh formulation of the frame potential

    See the supplemental material for details. (A) The Keldysh formulation of the frame potential. (B) The eval- uation of the frame potential in the TLL, including short- time, long-time, and strong-disorder limits. (C) The gen- eralization of FP to arbitraryk. (D) The multiple-quench protocol (E) The higher-order filter construction. (F) Ad- ditional numeri...

    work page

  37. [37]

    D. A. Harville,Matrix Algebra From a Statistician ’s Per- spective(Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997)

    work page 1997

  38. [38]

    H. G. Krojanski and D. Suter, Reduced decoherence in large quantum registers, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 150503 (2006)

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    Lovri´ c, H

    M. Lovri´ c, H. G. Krojanski, and D. Suter, Decoherence in large quantum registers under variable interaction with the environment, Phys. Rev. A75, 042305 (2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Li, T.-G

    Y. Li, T.-G. Zhou, Z. Wu, P. Peng, S. Zhang, R. Fu, R. Zhang, W. Zheng, P. Zhang, H. Zhai, X. Peng, and J. Du, Emergent universal quench dynamics in randomly interacting spin models, Nat. Phys.20, 1966 (2024)

    work page 1966

  41. [41]

    Li, T.-G

    Y.-C. Li, T.-G. Zhou, S. Zhang, Z. Wu, L. Zhao, H. Yin, X. An, H. Zhai, P. Zhang, X. Peng, and J. Du, Error- Resilient Reversal of Quantum Chaotic Dynamics En- abled by Scramblons, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 060403 (2026)

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    J. Choi, S. Choi, G. Kucsko, P. C. Maurer, B. J. Shields, H. Sumiya, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, E. Demler, F. Jelezko, N. Y. Yao, and M. D. Lukin, Depolarization dynamics in a strongly interacting solid-state spin ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 093601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Kucsko, S

    G. Kucsko, S. Choi, J. Choi, P. C. Maurer, H. Zhou, R. Landig, H. Sumiya, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, E. Demler, N. Y. Yao, and M. D. Lukin, Critical thermal- ization of a disordered dipolar spin system in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 023601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    K. R. A. Hazzard, B. Gadway, M. Foss-Feig, B. Yan, S. A. Moses, J. P. Covey, N. Y. Yao, M. D. Lukin, J. Ye, D. S. Jin, and A. M. Rey, Many-Body Dynamics of Dipolar Molecules in an Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 195302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. A. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Realizing a lattice spin model with polar molecules, Nature501, 521 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Schauß, M

    P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two- dimensional Rydberg gas, Nature491, 87 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Smale, P

    S. Smale, P. He, B. A. Olsen, K. G. Jackson, H. Sharum, S. Trotzky, J. Marino, A. M. Rey, and J. H. Thywissen, Observation of a transition between dynamical phases in a quantum degenerate Fermi gas, Sci. Adv.5, eaax1568 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Signoles, T

    A. Signoles, T. Franz, R. Ferracini Alves, M. G¨ arttner, S. Whitlock, G. Z¨ urn, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Glassy Dy- namics in a Disordered Heisenberg Quantum Spin Sys- tem, Phys. Rev. X11, 011011 (2021). 7

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Confor- mal symmetry and its breaking in two-dimensional nearly anti-de sitter space, PTEP2016, 12C104 (2016), arXiv:1606.01857

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Bagrets, A

    D. Bagrets, A. Altland, and A. Kamenev, Sachdev–ye– kitaev model as liouville quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B911, 191 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Gu, X.-L

    Y. Gu, X.-L. Qi, and D. Stanford, Local criticality, diffu- sion and chaos in generalized sachdev–ye–kitaev models, J. High Energy Phys.2017(05), 125

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Song, C.-M

    X.-Y. Song, C.-M. Jian, and L. Balents, Strongly corre- lated metal built from sachdev–ye–kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 216601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Vermersch, A

    B. Vermersch, A. Elben, M. Dalmonte, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Unitaryn-designs via random quenches in atomic hubbard and spin models: Application to the measurement of r´ enyi entropies, Phys. Rev. A97, 023604 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    A. A. Mele, Introduction to Haar Measure Tools in Quan- tum Information: A Beginner’s Tutorial, Quantum8, 1340 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Three Hamiltonians are Sufficient for Unitary $k$-Design in Temporal Ensemble

    Y.-N. Zhou, T.-G. Zhou, and J. Sonner, Three hamil- tonians are sufficient for unitaryk-design in temporal ensemble (2026), arXiv:2604.04205 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    F. D. M. Haldane, General relation of correlation expo- nents and spectral properties of one-dimensional fermi systems: Application to the anisotropics= 1 2 heisen- berg chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 1358 (1980)

    work page 1980

  57. [57]

    Luther and I

    A. Luther and I. Peschel, Calculation of critical expo- nents in two dimensions from quantum field theory in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B12, 3908 (1975)

    work page 1975

  58. [58]

    Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entan- gled quantum computations, Phys

    G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entan- gled quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 147902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  59. [59]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys.326, 96 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Elben, B

    A. Elben, B. Vermersch, M. Dalmonte, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, R´ enyi entropies from random quenches in atomic hubbard and spin models, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 050406 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    k−1X i=0 ∂xΨ4i+1(x, t)−∂ xΨ4i+4(x, t) #

    P. Roushan, C. Neill, J. Tangpanitanon, V. M. Bastidas, A. Megrant, R. Barends, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, M. Giustina, E. Jef- frey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Quin- tana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, H. Neven, D. G. Angelakis, and J. Martinis, Spectro- scopic signatures of localizat...

    work page 2017