pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17550 · v4 · pith:UIAFGFQKnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · ✦ hep-th

Krylov Correlators in mathfrak{sl}(2,mathbb R) Models: Exact Results and Holographic Complexity

Eleonora Alfinito , Matteo Beccaria This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 19:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords Krylov complexityholographic complexityBTZ black holeout-of-time-ordered correlatorssl(2,R) symmetryAdS/CFTquantum information
0
0 comments X

The pith

Certain out-of-time-ordered Krylov correlators in sl(2,R) models are proportional to combinations of proper radial momenta for a particle falling into the BTZ black hole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives exact expressions for Krylov correlators in quantum systems possessing sl(2,R) or Heisenberg-Weyl symmetry. It applies these to the complexity-momentum correspondence by showing that specific out-of-time-ordered correlators involving two or more Krylov speed operators at different times equal combinations of the proper radial momenta of a particle falling into the BTZ black hole. These momenta are evaluated at the corresponding times in the bulk AdS3 geometry. A sympathetic reader cares because this extends the original relation, which links complexity growth to momentum increase, to include fluctuations and temporal correlations in the dual boundary state.

Core claim

In systems with sl(2,R) symmetry, exact results for Krylov correlators are obtained. Certain out-of-time-ordered correlators of Krylov speed operators at different times turn out to be proportional to combinations of the proper radial momenta of a particle falling into the BTZ black hole in AdS3, evaluated at those times. This provides a first step toward generalizing the complexity-momentum correspondence to higher complexities and correlators encoding state spreading fluctuations.

What carries the argument

The out-of-time-ordered correlators of multiple Krylov speed operators, which link boundary quantum fluctuations to bulk radial momenta via the sl(2,R) symmetry.

If this is right

  • The complexity-momentum correspondence extends beyond the rate of complexity growth to include temporal correlations.
  • Boundary measurements of Krylov correlators can directly inform about bulk particle dynamics in the black hole geometry.
  • Exact solvability in sl(2,R) models allows precise tests of the holographic relation at the semiclassical level.
  • Similar relations may hold in other symmetric models like Heisenberg-Weyl for different holographic setups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If true, this relation could allow extraction of bulk momentum information from boundary OTOCs without direct bulk computation.
  • Connections to quantum chaos measures might emerge since OTOCs are involved.
  • Extensions to higher-dimensional black holes could be tested by finding analogous symmetric boundary models.

Load-bearing premise

The sl(2,R) symmetry and models accurately capture the boundary dynamics relevant to the semiclassical BTZ black hole so that the correlators correspond directly to the bulk momenta.

What would settle it

A direct numerical computation of the out-of-time-ordered Krylov correlators in a concrete sl(2,R) representation and comparison to the independently calculated radial momenta of the infalling particle at matching times.

read the original abstract

In holography, the complexity--momentum correspondence relates the increasing momentum of a point particle falling into an eternal black hole to the rate of growth of the Krylov complexity of the dual boundary state, a conjecture established exactly for the BTZ black hole in AdS$_{3}$ at the semiclassical level. We examine possible extensions of the correspondence by considering boundary higher Krylov complexities and Krylov correlators encoding fluctuations and temporal correlations of the spreading quantum state. To this end, we derive exact results for Krylov correlators in quantum systems with $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{R})$ or Heisenberg-Weyl symmetry and apply them to the complexity--momentum correspondence. We show that certain out-of-time-ordered correlators of two or more Krylov speed operators at different times are proportional to combinations of the proper radial momenta of a particle falling into the BTZ black hole in AdS$_{3}$, evaluated at those times. This represents a first step in the generalization of the original complexity--momentum relation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives exact expressions for Krylov correlators in quantum systems with sl(2,R) or Heisenberg-Weyl symmetry. It then applies these results to the complexity-momentum correspondence, asserting that certain out-of-time-ordered correlators of two or more Krylov speed operators at different times are proportional to linear combinations of the proper radial momenta p_r(t_i) of a particle falling into the BTZ black hole in AdS3, evaluated at those times. This is framed as a first step toward generalizing the established single-operator complexity-momentum relation.

Significance. If the identification holds, the exact correlator formulas supply a concrete computational resource for sl(2,R) models, while the proposed extension of the complexity-momentum dictionary to multi-time OTOCs could enlarge the holographic interpretation of state spreading to include fluctuations. The work explicitly builds upon and cites the prior exact verification of the single-operator case for BTZ.

major comments (1)
  1. [Holographic application (following the exact correlator derivations)] The proportionality between the OTOCs and combinations of p_r(t_i) is obtained by direct substitution of the boundary operators into the complexity-momentum relation previously established only for the expectation value of a single speed operator. No independent bulk geodesic calculation or extended dictionary entry is supplied for the multi-operator correlator case; the mapping is assumed to carry over unchanged once the sl(2,R) generators are identified with AdS3 isometries.
minor comments (1)
  1. The notation for the Krylov speed operators and the precise definition of the correlators could be introduced with an explicit equation early in the manuscript to improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and for highlighting the distinction between the established single-operator case and our proposed multi-operator extension. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Holographic application (following the exact correlator derivations)] The proportionality between the OTOCs and combinations of p_r(t_i) is obtained by direct substitution of the boundary operators into the complexity-momentum relation previously established only for the expectation value of a single speed operator. No independent bulk geodesic calculation or extended dictionary entry is supplied for the multi-operator correlator case; the mapping is assumed to carry over unchanged once the sl(2,R) generators are identified with AdS3 isometries.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the multi-time result follows from substituting the exact boundary Krylov correlators into the complexity-momentum dictionary that was previously verified only for the single-operator expectation value. Our derivation relies on the identification of the sl(2,R) generators with the AdS3 Killing vectors (which is standard and already used in the single-operator verification) together with the assumption that the same dictionary entry applies to the higher correlators built from those operators. We present this explicitly as “a first step” in the abstract and introduction, without claiming an independent bulk derivation for the OTOCs. A full holographic check would require computing the appropriate multi-point bulk correlators or geodesics, which lies outside the scope of the present work. We can add a clarifying sentence in the discussion section stating that the extension remains conjectural pending such a bulk verification. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation of correlators is independent and mapping applies external prior result.

full rationale

The paper derives exact Krylov correlator expressions from sl(2,R) and Heisenberg-Weyl symmetry algebras, which are self-contained algebraic computations. The holographic identification with BTZ radial momenta applies a previously established complexity-momentum conjecture (cited as external) to the new multi-operator OTOCs without re-deriving the dictionary or fitting parameters to the target quantities. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided derivation chain. The central results remain independently verifiable against the algebraic models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract, the work assumes sl(2,R) symmetry for the models and relies on the established semiclassical correspondence for BTZ without new independent evidence provided here.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption sl(2,R) or Heisenberg-Weyl symmetry governs the quantum systems under study
    Invoked to derive exact results for Krylov correlators.
  • domain assumption The complexity-momentum correspondence holds exactly for the BTZ black hole at the semiclassical level
    Used as the foundation to apply the new correlators to the bulk momenta.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5720 in / 1356 out tokens · 24926 ms · 2026-06-30T19:08:58.454869+00:00 · methodology

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Krylov complexity has it all

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Krylov complexity is equivalent to Lanczos coefficients, return amplitude, and spectral density for operator dynamics, via an explicit recursive algorithm from its t=0 Taylor expansion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum Dynamics in Krylov Space: Methods and Applications

    P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Martínez-Azcona, A. Dymarsky and A. del Campo, Quantum dynamics in Krylov space: Methods and applications,Phys. Rept.1125-1128 (2025) 1 [2405.09628]. S. Baiguera, V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, S. Chapman, J. Haferkamp, M. P. Heller et al., Quantum Complexity in Gravity, Quantum Field Theory, and Quantum Information S...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A Bound on Chaos,JHEP08(2016) 106 [1503.01409]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi and E. Altman,A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis,Phys. Rev. X9(2019) 041017 [1812.08657]

    work page arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    J. L. F. Barbón, E. Rabinovici, R. Shir and R. Sinha,On The Evolution Of Operator Complexity Beyond Scrambling,JHEP10(2019) 264 [1907.05393]. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,Krylov localization and suppression of complexity,JHEP03(2022) 211 [2112.12128]. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,Krylov complexity fr...

    work page arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    A bulk manifestation of Krylov complexity

    E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,A bulk manifestation of Krylov complexity,JHEP08(2023) 213 [2305.04355]. 29

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Xu,On Chord Dynamics and Complexity Growth in Double-Scaled SYK,2411.04251

    J. Xu,On Chord Dynamics and Complexity Growth in Double-Scaled SYK,JHEP06(2025) 259 [2411.04251]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Ambrosini, E

    M. Ambrosini, E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,Operator K-complexity in DSSYK: Krylov complexity equals bulk length,JHEP08(2025) 059 [2412.15318]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    M. P. Heller, J. Papalini and T. Schuhmann,Krylov Spread Complexity as Holographic Complexity Beyond Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 151602 [2412.17785]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    J. M. Maldacena,Eternal Black Holes in Anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  10. [10]

    Addendum to Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons

    L. Susskind,Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons,Fortsch. Phys.64(2016) 24 [1403.5695]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries

    D. Stanford and L. Susskind,Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries,Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 126007 [1406.2678]. A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao,Complexity, Action, and Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 086006 [1512.04993]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Does Complexity Equal Anything?

    A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. Sárosi and A. J. Speranza,Does Complexity Equal Anything?,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 081602 [2111.02429]. A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. Sárosi and A. J. Speranza,Complexity equals anything II,JHEP01(2023) 154 [2210.09647]

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Switchbacks and the Bridge to Nowhere

    L. Susskind and Y. Zhao,Switchbacks and the Bridge to Nowhere,1408.2823. L. Susskind,Why Do Things Fall?,1802.01198. L. Susskind,Complexity and Newton’s Laws,Front. in Phys.8(2020) 262 [1904.12819]. L. Susskind and Y. Zhao,Complexity and Momentum,JHEP03(2021) 239 [2006.03019]. H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao,Symmetries Near the Horizon,JHEP08(2019) 04...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    J. L. F. Barbón, J. Martín-García and M. Sasieta,Momentum/Complexity Duality and the Black Hole Interior,JHEP07(2020) 169 [1912.05996]. J. L. F. Barbón, J. Martin-Garcia and M. Sasieta,Proof of a Momentum/Complexity Correspondence,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 101901 [2006.06607]. J. L. F. Barbón, J. Martin-Garcia and M. Sasieta,A Generalized Momentum/Complexity ...

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Caputa, B

    P. Caputa, B. Chen, R. W. McDonald, J. Simón and B. Strittmatter,Spread complexity rate as proper momentum,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) L041901 [2410.23334]

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan and Q. Wu,Quantum Chaos and the Complexity of Spread of States,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 046007 [2202.06957]

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, H. A. Camargo, V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim and M. Nishida,Krylov Operator Complexity in Holographic CFTs: Smeared Boundary Reconstruction and the Dual Proper Radial Momentum,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 126014 [2506.03273]. 30

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Momentum-Krylov complexity correspondence,

    Z.-Y. Fan,Momentum-Krylov Complexity Correspondence,2411.04492. P.-Z. He,Revisit the Relationship Between Spread Complexity Rate and Radial Momentum, 2411.19172. A. Fatemiabhari, H. Nastase and D. Roychowdhury,Holographic Krylov complexity inN“4 SYM,2511.19286. A. Fatemiabhari, H. Nastase, C. Nunez and D. Roychowdhury,Holographic Krylov Complexity in Conf...

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    A. R. Brown and L. Susskind,Second Law of Quantum Complexity,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 086015 [1701.01107]. L. Susskind,Three Lectures on Complexity and Black Holes, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer, 10, 2018,1810.11563, DOI

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Holography of K-complexity: Switchbacks and Shockwaves

    M. Ambrosini, E. Rabinovici and J. Sonner,Holography of K-Complexity: Switchbacks and Shockwaves,2510.17975. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez and J. Xu,Geometry of Chord Intertwiner, Multiple Shocks and Switchback in Double-Scaled Syk,JHEP02(2026) 246 [2506.19013]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Bhattacharjee, X

    B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy and T. Pathak,Operator Growth in Open Quantum Systems: Lessons from the Dissipative SYK,JHEP03(2023) 054 [2212.06180]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Bhattacharjee, P

    B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy and T. Pathak,Krylov Complexity in Large Q and Double-Scaled SYK Model,JHEP08(2023) 099 [2210.02474]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Fu, K.-Y

    Y. Fu, K.-Y. Kim, K. Pal and K. Pal,Statistics and Complexity of Wavefunction Spreading in Quantum Dynamical Systems,JHEP06(2025) 139 [2411.09390]. H. A. Camargo, Y. Fu, V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim and K. Pal,Higher-Order Krylov State Complexity in Random Matrix Quenches,JHEP07(2025) 182 [2412.16472]. A. Grabarits and A. del Campo,Universal Growth of Krylov Comp...

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Geometry of Krylov complexity

    P. Caputa, J. M. Magan and D. Patramanis,Geometry of Krylov Complexity,Phys. Rev. Res. 4(2022) 013041 [2109.03824]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Krylov Dynamics and Operator Growth in Time-Dependent Systems via Lie Algebras

    A. Grabarits, E. Medina-Guerra and A. del Campo,Krylov Dynamics and Operator Growth in Time-Dependent Systems via Lie Algebras,2605.05290

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Caputa, J.M

    P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, D. Patramanis and E. Tonni,Krylov Complexity of Modular Hamiltonian Evolution,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 086004 [2306.14732]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Dymarsky and A

    A. Dymarsky and A. Gorsky,Quantum chaos as delocalization in Krylov space,Phys. Rev. B 102(2020) 085137 [1912.12227]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Dymarsky and M

    A. Dymarsky and M. Smolkin,Krylov Complexity in Conformal Field Theory,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) L081702 [2104.09514]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Chowdhury,Spread and Circuit Complexity as a Measure of Particle Content and Phase Space Fluctuations,2511.02013

    S. Chowdhury,Spread and Circuit Complexity as a Measure of Particle Content and Phase Space Fluctuations,2511.02013. 31

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    K. N. Boyadzhiev,Derivative polynomials for tanh, tan, sech and sec in explicit form,The Fibonacci Quarterly45(2007) 291

    2007

  31. [31]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov,Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconductivity, Sov Phys JETP28(1969) 1200

    1969

  32. [32]

    The Black Hole in Three Dimensional Space Time

    M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,The Black Hole in Three-Dimensional Space-Time, Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099]. M. Bañados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,Geometry of the (2+1) Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 1506 [gr-qc/9302012]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  33. [33]

    Berenstein and J

    D. Berenstein and J. Simón,Localized states in global AdS space,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 046026 [1910.10227]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Holographic Local Quenches and Entanglement Density

    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa and T. Takayanagi,Holographic Local Quenches and Entanglement Density,JHEP05(2013) 080 [1302.5703]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Toward Krylov-based holography in double-scaled SYK

    Y. Fu, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and J. F. Pedraza,Toward Krylov-Based Holography in Double-Scaled Syk,JHEP05(2026) 056 [2510.22658]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez,Deforming the Double-Scaled SYK & Reaching the Stretched Horizon From Finite Cutoff Holography,2602.06113. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, T. Kukolj and J. Seitz,Q-Askey Deformations of Double-Scaled Syk, 2605.13956

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez,Building the holographic dictionary of the DSSYK from chords, complexity & wormholes with matter,JHEP10(2025) 221 [2505.22716]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNLimit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity,Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  39. [39]

    Hashimoto, K

    K. Hashimoto, K. Murata, N. Tanahashi and R. Watanabe,Krylov Complexity and Chaos in Quantum Mechanics,JHEP11(2023) 040 [2305.16669]. 32

    work page arXiv 2023