pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18494 · v2 · pith:IOAOBQ3Hnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.str-el

Quantum magic of strongly correlated fermions - the Hubbard dimer

Edoardo Zavatti , Gabriele Bellomia , Massimo Capone This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 18:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el
keywords non-stabilizernessquantum magicHubbard dimerstrongly correlated fermionsrobustness of magicstabilizer Rényi entropyquantum quenchfermionic non-Gaussianity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-stabilizerness acts as a distinct quantum resource in the Hubbard dimer that captures complexity missed by entanglement and non-Gaussianity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the amount of non-stabilizerness present in the Hubbard dimer, an exactly solvable model of two fermions with tunable interaction. It tracks this quantity both in equilibrium at zero and finite temperature and during the nonequilibrium evolution after a sudden change in the Hamiltonian. The calculations show that non-stabilizerness distinguishes states whose complexity is invisible to standard measures such as fermionic non-Gaussianity and two-site entanglement. In particular the stabilizer Rényi entropy frequently underestimates magic in the mixed states that arise naturally in this system.

Core claim

In the Hubbard dimer the robustness of magic remains nonzero across a range of interaction strengths and temperatures while the stabilizer Rényi entropy often returns zero for mixed states; when compared with fermionic non-Gaussianity and superselected entanglement, non-stabilizerness therefore supplies an independent diagnostic of quantum complexity in a tunable fermionic model.

What carries the argument

Robustness of magic and stabilizer Rényi entropy applied to the eigenstates and time-evolved states of the Hubbard dimer Hamiltonian.

If this is right

  • Non-stabilizerness supplies information about quantum complexity that is independent of entanglement and non-Gaussianity in interacting fermion systems.
  • The stabilizer Rényi entropy is unreliable for mixed states that commonly appear at finite temperature or after quenches.
  • Interaction strength directly controls the amount of non-stabilizerness generated in the dimer.
  • Temperature and quench protocols produce distinct signatures in non-stabilizerness that are not reproduced by other resource measures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same measures could be applied to larger Hubbard lattices to test whether the dimer already captures the essential scaling of magic with system size.
  • Non-stabilizerness may serve as a diagnostic for the onset of strongly correlated regimes that are difficult to characterize with conventional entanglement witnesses.
  • If the dimer results hold more broadly, magic could become a practical figure of merit when designing fermionic quantum simulators or variational circuits.

Load-bearing premise

Results obtained for the two-site Hubbard dimer are representative of non-stabilizerness behavior in strongly correlated fermions more generally.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the robustness of magic in a three-site or four-site Hubbard chain that yields zero magic wherever the dimer predicts nonzero magic would falsify the representativeness claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18494 by Edoardo Zavatti, Gabriele Bellomia, Massimo Capone.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Geometric interpretation of the robustness of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Non-stabilizerness measures (panel a), inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Top panel: Local non-stabilizerness as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Log-free robustness of magic for the Hubbard dimer at finite temperature. In (a) we display the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Dynamics of non-stabilizerness after a quench at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Saturation value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Log-free robustness of magic computed for two different density matrices: on the left panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the non-stabilizerness (quantum magic) content of the Hubbard dimer, an analytically solvable, yet completely non-trivial, model of strongly correlated fermions. We consider zero- and finite-temperature properties as well as the time evolution after a quantum quench drives the system out of equilibrium. We evaluate local and nonlocal non-stabilizerness using both the robustness of magic and the stabilizer Renyi entropy, demonstrating how the latter often fails in detecting the mixed stabilizer states that are typically found in this kind of systems. Finally, we compare the non-stabilizerness with other genuine resources of quantum-state complexity, i.e., the fermionic non-Gaussianity and the superselected two-site entanglement. Our findings corroborate the role of non-stabilizerness as a fundamental quantum resource, capturing aspects of quantum complexity that elude traditional information-theoretic measures and providing a novel perspective on fermionic systems with tunable interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies non-stabilizerness (quantum magic) in the Hubbard dimer, an exactly solvable two-site, two-electron model of interacting fermions. It computes local and nonlocal measures using robustness of magic and stabilizer Rényi entropy at zero and finite temperature as well as after quantum quenches, shows that the stabilizer Rényi entropy frequently fails to detect magic in the mixed states arising in this system, and compares these quantities to fermionic non-Gaussianity and superselected entanglement. The authors conclude that non-stabilizerness captures distinct aspects of quantum complexity in fermionic systems with tunable interactions.

Significance. If the explicit calculations and comparisons hold, the work supplies a clean, analytically tractable benchmark that isolates distinctions among magic, non-Gaussianity, and entanglement measures. Credit is due for the exact treatment of both equilibrium and quench dynamics on a model whose Hilbert space is only four-dimensional, allowing unambiguous identification of mixed stabilizer states.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §1] Abstract and §1: the framing of the Hubbard dimer as a 'completely non-trivial' model that 'faithfully represents' the non-stabilizerness properties of strongly correlated fermions is load-bearing for the broader claim, yet the manuscript provides no scaling argument, comparison to larger lattices, or discussion of the absence of emergent many-body phenomena (Mott gap, doping-driven transitions) that define strong correlations in extended systems.
  2. [Results (SRE comparison)] Results section on SRE vs. robustness of magic: the claim that stabilizer Rényi entropy 'often fails in detecting the mixed stabilizer states' requires an explicit counter-example with numerical values (e.g., a thermal or post-quench state whose SRE is zero while robustness of magic is positive) together with the precise definition of the SRE used for mixed states; without this the distinction remains qualitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for local vs. nonlocal magic should be introduced once and used consistently; the current alternation between 'local non-stabilizerness' and 'on-site magic' is unclear.
  2. Figure captions for quench dynamics should state the initial state, quench parameter, and time interval explicitly rather than referring only to the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §1] Abstract and §1: the framing of the Hubbard dimer as a 'completely non-trivial' model that 'faithfully represents' the non-stabilizerness properties of strongly correlated fermions is load-bearing for the broader claim, yet the manuscript provides no scaling argument, comparison to larger lattices, or discussion of the absence of emergent many-body phenomena (Mott gap, doping-driven transitions) that define strong correlations in extended systems.

    Authors: We agree that the Hubbard dimer does not capture emergent many-body phenomena such as the Mott gap or doping-driven transitions that appear in extended systems, and the manuscript contains no scaling arguments or comparisons to larger lattices. The model was selected because its four-dimensional Hilbert space permits fully analytic, approximation-free computation of all quantities at zero and finite temperature and after quenches. We will revise the abstract and §1 to replace 'completely non-trivial' and 'faithfully represents' with 'minimal yet non-trivial benchmark model' that isolates distinctions among non-stabilizerness, non-Gaussianity, and superselected entanglement. This change removes the load-bearing claim while preserving the paper's scope. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (SRE comparison)] Results section on SRE vs. robustness of magic: the claim that stabilizer Rényi entropy 'often fails in detecting the mixed stabilizer states' requires an explicit counter-example with numerical values (e.g., a thermal or post-quench state whose SRE is zero while robustness of magic is positive) together with the precise definition of the SRE used for mixed states; without this the distinction remains qualitative.

    Authors: We accept that the distinction would be stronger with an explicit numerical example. The stabilizer Rényi entropy for mixed states is evaluated via the convex-roof extension of the pure-state definition (we will state the precise formula and reference). In the revised manuscript we will insert a concrete counter-example, for instance a thermal state at a specific inverse temperature or a post-quench state at a given time, reporting numerical values where SRE = 0 while robustness of magic remains strictly positive. This will render the failure quantitative. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper performs direct numerical evaluation of non-stabilizerness measures (robustness of magic, stabilizer Rényi entropy) on the exactly solvable Hubbard dimer at zero/finite temperature and after quenches, then compares them to fermionic non-Gaussianity and superselected entanglement. All reported quantities are obtained from the model's four-dimensional Hilbert space via exact diagonalization and matrix exponentiation; no parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem or self-definitional loop is invoked. The central claim that non-stabilizerness captures distinct complexity aspects is a comparative observation on computed values, not a reduction to the inputs by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; no free parameters, additional axioms, or invented entities are identifiable.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Hubbard dimer is an analytically solvable yet completely non-trivial model of strongly correlated fermions.
    Invoked in the abstract as the justification for using the model to study non-stabilizerness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5686 in / 1293 out tokens · 33272 ms · 2026-06-30T18:23:55.554588+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unitary Designs from Doped Matchgate Circuits

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Doped matchgate circuits achieve approximate parity-preserving 2-designs in polylogarithmic depth using a sparse number of non-Gaussian gates, with the design formation mapped exactly to a birth-death Markov chain.

  2. Practical Tests and Witnesses of Fermionic non-Gaussianity

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces practical witnesses of fermionic non-Gaussianity via antiflatness from covariance matrices, with two efficient measurement protocols, a purity-corrected version for mixed states, and experimental results on...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    GB further acknowledges support through the SFB Q- M&S project of the FWF, DOI 10.55776/F86

    and PRIN 2022 (Prot.20228YCYY7) programmes. GB further acknowledges support through the SFB Q- M&S project of the FWF, DOI 10.55776/F86. Appendix A: Mixing and the vanishing of magic In this appendix, we highlight more explicitly the mechanisms behind both thethermaland thedynami- caldeath of magic, shown respectively in Secs.V and VI. As temperature incr...

    work page doi:10.55776/f86 2022

  2. [2]

    M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani, An introduction to en- tanglement measures, Quantum Info. Comput.7, 1–51 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Reviews of mod- ern physics81, 865 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and be- yond, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and be- yond, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Jozsa and N

    R. Jozsa and N. Linden, On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Phys- ical and Engineering Sciences459, 2011 (2003)

    2011

  6. [7]

    Gottesman, Theory of fault-tolerant quantum com- putation, Physical Review A57, 127 (1998)

    D. Gottesman, Theory of fault-tolerant quantum com- putation, Physical Review A57, 127 (1998)

    1998

  7. [8]

    Gottesman, The heisenberg representation of quan- tum computers, arXiv preprint quant-ph/9807006 (1998)

    D. Gottesman, The heisenberg representation of quan- tum computers, arXiv preprint quant-ph/9807006 (1998)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [9]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  9. [10]

    Gottesman,Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection(California Institute of Technology, 1997)

    D. Gottesman,Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection(California Institute of Technology, 1997)

    1997

  10. [11]

    B. Zeng, A. Cross, and I. L. Chuang, Transversality versus universality for additive quantum codes, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory57, 6272 (2011)

    2011

  11. [12]

    Veitch, S

    V. Veitch, S. H. Mousavian, D. Gottesman, and J. Emerson, The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation,NewJournalofPhysics16,013009(2014)

    2014

  12. [13]

    Howard and E

    M. Howard and E. Campbell, Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum com- puting, Physical review letters118, 090501 (2017)

    2017

  13. [14]

    Bravyi and A

    S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computa- tion with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics71, 022316 (2005)

    2005

  14. [15]

    Paviglianiti, M

    A. Paviglianiti, M. Seclì, E. Tirrito, and V. Savona, The true cost of factoring: Linking magic and number-theoretic complexity in shor’s algorithm (2026), arXiv:2605.05347 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [16]

    Liu and A

    Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, Many-body quantum magic, PRX Quantum3, 020333 (2022)

    2022

  16. [17]

    S. F. Oliviero, L. Leone, and A. Hamma, Magic-state re- source theory for the ground state of the transverse-field ising model, Physical Review A106, 042426 (2022)

    2022

  17. [18]

    P. S. Tarabunga, Critical behaviors of non-stabilizerness in quantum spin chains, Quantum8, 1413 (2024)

    2024

  18. [19]

    Passarelli, R

    G. Passarelli, R. Fazio, and P. Lucignano, Nonstabilizer- ness of permutationally invariant systems, Physical Re- view A110, 022436 (2024)

    2024

  19. [20]

    Smith, Z

    R. Smith, Z. Papić, and A. Hallam, Nonstabilizerness in kinetically constrained rydberg atom arrays, Physical Review B111, 245148 (2025)

    2025

  20. [21]

    P. S. Tarabunga and C. Castelnovo, Magic in general- ized rokhsar-kivelson wavefunctions, Quantum8, 1347 (2024)

    2024

  21. [22]

    Viscardi, M

    M. Viscardi, M. Dalmonte, A. Hamma, and E. Tirrito, Interplay of entanglement structures and stabilizer en- tropy in spin models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08620 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  22. [23]

    C. Cao, G. Cheng, A. Hamma, L. Leone, W. Munizzi, and S. Oliviero, Gravitational back-reaction is magical (2024), arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07056

    arXiv 2024

  23. [24]

    P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, T. Chanda, and M. Dalmonte, Many-body magic via pauli-markov chains—from criticality to gauge theories, PRX Quan- tum4, 040317 (2023)

    2023

  24. [25]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli, Quantifying nonstabilizerness of matrix product states, Physical Review B107, 035148 (2023)

    2023

  25. [26]

    Lami and M

    G. Lami and M. Collura, Unveiling the stabilizer group of a matrix product state, Physical Review Letters133, 010602 (2024)

    2024

  26. [27]

    P. S. Tarabunga and T. Haug, Efficient mutual magic and magic capacity with matrix product states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07230 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  27. [28]

    Collura, J

    M. Collura, J. De Nardis, V. Alba, and G. Lami, The quantum magic of fermionic gaussian states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05367 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  28. [29]

    Sarkis and A

    M. Sarkis and A. Tkatchenko, Are molecules magical? non-stabilizerness in molecular bonding, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06673 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [30]

    Timsina, Y.-M

    H. Timsina, Y.-M. Ding, E. Tirrito, P. S. Tarabunga, B.-B. Mao, M. Collura, Z. Yan, and M. Dalmonte, Robustness of magic in the quantum ising chain via quantum monte carlo tomography, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12902 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  30. [31]

    Marian and T

    P. Marian and T. A. Marian, Relative entropy is an exact measure of non-gaussianity, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics88, 012322 (2013)

    2013

  31. [32]

    L. Lami, B. Regula, X. Wang, R. Nichols, A. Winter, and G. Adesso, Gaussian quantum resource theories, Physical Review A98, 022335 (2018)

    2018

  32. [33]

    Lumia, E

    L. Lumia, E. Tirrito, R. Fazio, and M. Collura, Measurement-induced transitions beyond gaussianity: A single particle description, Physical Review Research 6, 023176 (2024)

    2024

  33. [34]

    Lyu and K

    X. Lyu and K. Bu, Fermionic gaussian testing and non-gaussian measures via convolution, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08180 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  34. [35]

    A. A. Mele and Y. Herasymenko, Efficient learning of quantum states prepared with few fermionic non- gaussian gates, PRX Quantum6, 010319 (2025)

    2025

  35. [36]

    Sierant, P

    P. Sierant, P. Stornati, and X. Turkeshi, Fermionic magic resources of quantum many-body systems (2025), arXiv:2506.00116 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  36. [37]

    Hebenstreit, R

    M. Hebenstreit, R. Jozsa, B. Kraus, S. Strelchuk, and M. Yoganathan, All pure fermionic non-gaussian states are magic states for matchgate computations, Physical review letters123, 080503 (2019)

    2019

  37. [38]

    Oszmaniec, N

    M. Oszmaniec, N. Dangniam, M. E. Morales, and Z. Zimborás, Fermion sampling: a robust quantum com- putational advantage scheme using fermionic linear op- tics and magic input states, PRX Quantum3, 020328 (2022)

    2022

  38. [39]

    Reardon-Smith, M

    O. Reardon-Smith, M. Oszmaniec, and K. Korzekwa, Improved simulation of quantum circuits dominated by free fermionic operations, Quantum8, 1549 (2024)

    2024

  39. [40]

    Dias and R

    B. Dias and R. Koenig, Classical simulation of non- gaussian fermionic circuits, Quantum8, 1350 (2024). 14

    2024

  40. [41]

    Langer, R

    M. Langer, R. Morral-Yepes, A. Gammon-Smith, F. Pollmann, and B. Kraus, Matchgate circuit repre- sentation of fermionic gaussian states: optimal prepa- ration, approximation, and classical simulation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05675 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  41. [42]

    A. D. Gottlieb and N. J. Mauser, New measure of electron correlation, Physical Review Letters95, 10.1103/physrevlett.95.123003 (2005)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.123003 2005

  42. [43]

    A. D. Gottlieb and N. J. Mauser, Properties of non- freeness: An entropy measure of electron correlation, International Journal of Quantum Information5, 815 (2007)

    2007

  43. [44]

    A. D. Gottlieb and N. J. Mauser, Correlation in fermion or boson systems as the minimum of entropy relative to all free states, arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.7640 (2014)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [45]

    Byczuk, J

    K. Byczuk, J. Kuneš, W. Hofstetter, and D. Vollhardt, Quantification of correlations in quantum many-particle systems, Physical Review Letters108, 087004 (2012)

    2012

  45. [46]

    Held and N

    K. Held and N. J. Mauser, Physics behind the mini- mum of relative entropy measures for correlations, The European Physical Journal B86, 10.1140/epjb/e2013- 40424-5 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2013- 2013

  46. [47]

    Aliverti-Piuri, K

    D. Aliverti-Piuri, K. Chatterjee, L. Ding, K. Liao, J. Liebert, and C. Schilling, What can quantum in- formation theory offer to quantum chemistry?, Faraday Discussions254, 76 (2024)

    2024

  47. [48]

    M. G. Genoni and M. G. A. Paris, Quantifying non- gaussianity for quantum information, Physical Review A82, 10.1103/physreva.82.052341 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.82.052341 2010

  48. [49]

    Eisert, S

    J. Eisert, S. Scheel, and M. B. Plenio, Distilling gaussian states with gaussian operations is impossible, Physical review letters89, 137903 (2002)

    2002

  49. [50]

    Giedke and J

    G. Giedke and J. I. Cirac, Characterization of gaussian operations and distillation of gaussian states, Physical Review A66, 032316 (2002)

    2002

  50. [51]

    Fiurášek, Gaussian transformations and distillation of entangled gaussian states, Physical review letters89, 137904 (2002)

    J. Fiurášek, Gaussian transformations and distillation of entangled gaussian states, Physical review letters89, 137904 (2002)

    2002

  51. [52]

    Niset, J

    J. Niset, J. Fiurášek, and N. J. Cerf, No-go theorem for gaussian quantum error correction, Physical review letters102, 120501 (2009)

    2009

  52. [53]

    T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy, Quantum computation with optical co- herent states, Physical Review A68, 042319 (2003)

    2003

  53. [54]

    A. P. Lund, T. C. Ralph, and H. L. Haselgrove, Fault- tolerant linear optical quantum computing with small- amplitude coherent states, Physical review letters100, 030503 (2008)

    2008

  54. [55]

    Chitambar and G

    E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025001 (2019)

    2019

  55. [56]

    Paviglianiti, L

    A. Paviglianiti, L. Lumia, E. Tirrito, A. Silva, M. Col- lura, X. Turkeshi, and G. Lami, Emergence of generic entanglement structure in doped matchgate circuits (2025), arXiv:2507.12526 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [57]

    Ding and C

    L. Ding and C. Schilling, Correlation paradox of the dissociation limit: A quantum information perspective, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation16, 4159 (2020)

    2020

  57. [58]

    L. Ding, Z. Zimboras, and C. Schilling, Quantify- ing electron entanglement faithfully, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.03377 (2022)

    arXiv 2022

  58. [59]

    L. Ding, S. Mardazad, S. Das, S. Szalay, U. Schollwöck, Z. Zimborás, and C. Schilling, Concept of orbital entan- glement and correlation in quantum chemistry, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation17, 79 (2020)

    2020

  59. [60]

    L. Ding, G. Dünnweber, and C. Schilling, Physical en- tanglement between localized orbitals, Quantum Sci- ence and Technology9, 015005 (2024)

    2024

  60. [61]

    Bellomia, C

    G. Bellomia, C. Mejuto-Zaera, M. Capone, and A. Amaricci, Quasilocal entanglement across the mott- hubbard transition, Physical Review B109, 115104 (2024)

    2024

  61. [62]

    Bippus, A

    F. Bippus, A. Kauch, G. Roósz, C. Mayrhofer, F. As- saad, and K. Held, Two-site entanglement in the two- dimensional hubbard model, Physical Review B113, 035152 (2026)

    2026

  62. [63]

    Bippus, J

    F. Bippus, J. Krsnik, M. Kitatani, L. Akšamović, A. Kauch, N. Barišić, and K. Held, Entanglement in the pseudogap regime of cuprate superconductors (2025), arXiv:2503.12463 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  63. [64]

    Bellomiaet al., Quantum information insights into strongly correlated electrons, (2024)

    G. Bellomiaet al., Quantum information insights into strongly correlated electrons, (2024)

    2024

  64. [65]

    Bellomia, A

    G. Bellomia, A. Amaricci, and M. Capone, Local clas- sical correlations between physical electrons in hubbard systems, Phys. Rev. B113, 155158 (2026)

    2026

  65. [66]

    Zavatti, G

    E. Zavatti, G. Bellomia, S. Giuli, M. Ferraretto, and M. Capone, More is uncorrelated: Tuning the local cor- relations of su(n) fermi-hubbard systems via controlled symmetry breaking, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03689 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  66. [67]

    D. J. Carrascal, J. Ferrer, J. C. Smith, and K. Burke, The hubbard dimer: a density functional case study of a many-body problem, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter27, 393001 (2015)

    2015

  67. [68]

    Giarrusso and P.-F

    S. Giarrusso and P.-F. Loos, Exact excited-state func- tionals of the asymmetric hubbard dimer, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14, 8780 (2023)

    2023

  68. [69]

    Avella, F

    A. Avella, F. Mancini, and T. Saikawa, The 2-site hub- bard and $\mathsf{t}$-$\mathsf{j}$models, The Euro- pean Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Com- plex Systems36, 445 (2003)

    2003

  69. [70]

    Capone and S

    M. Capone and S. Ciuchi, Interplay between spin and phonon fluctuations in the double-exchange model for the manganites, Phys. Rev. B65, 104409 (2002)

    2002

  70. [71]

    Sacchetti, P

    A. Sacchetti, P. Postorino, and M. Capone, High- pressure phase diagram in the manganites: a two-site model study, New Journal of Physics8, 3 (2006)

    2006

  71. [72]

    Andreadakis and P

    F. Andreadakis and P. Zanardi, An exact link between nonlocal magic and operator entanglement, arXiv e- prints , arXiv (2025)

    2025

  72. [73]

    Iannotti, B

    D. Iannotti, B. Magni, R. Cioli, A. Hamma, and X. Turkeshi, Non-local magic resources for fermionic gaussian states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.27049 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  73. [74]

    Collura, B

    M. Collura, B. Béri, and E. Tirrito, Nonlocal non- stabilizerness in free fermion models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.27055 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  74. [75]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer rényi entropy, Physical Review Letters128, 050402 (2022)

    2022

  75. [76]

    Bettaque and B

    V. Bettaque and B. Swingle, The structure of the ma- jorana clifford group, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11319 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  76. [77]

    Aaronson and D

    S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molec- ular, and Optical Physics70, 052328 (2004)

    2004

  77. [78]

    H. J. García, I. L. Markov, and A. W. Cross, On the geometry of stabilizer states, arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.07848 (2017). 15

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [79]

    Heinrich and D

    M. Heinrich and D. Gross, Robustness of magic and symmetries of the stabiliser polytope, Quantum3, 132 (2019)

    2019

  79. [80]

    J. R. Seddon and E. T. Campbell, Quantifying magic for multi-qubit operations, Proceedings of the Royal Soci- ety A475, 20190251 (2019)

    2019

  80. [81]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. Tarrach, Robustness of entanglement, Physical Review A59, 141 (1999)

    1999

Showing first 80 references.