pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20347 · v2 · pith:YRTVWUDNnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Symmetrization of Loss Functions for Robust Training of Neural Networks in the Presence of Noisy Labels

Alexandre Lemire Paquin , Brahim Chaib-Draa , Philippe Gigu\`ere This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 18:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords noisy labelsrobust loss functionssymmetrizationmulti-class unhinged losscross-entropylabel noise robustnessneural network training
0
0 comments X

The pith

Symmetrizing cross-entropy produces the unique convex multi-class symmetric loss for noisy labels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates symmetrization as a route to loss functions that stay effective when training labels contain errors. Any multi-class loss decomposes uniquely into a symmetric component and a class-insensitive term. Symmetrizing cross-entropy produces a linear multi-class extension of the unhinged loss. This loss is the sole convex symmetric multi-class loss under the stated assumptions and equals the linear approximation of any symmetric loss near score vectors whose components are equal. Two new interpolating losses, SGCE and alpha-MAE, are defined to trade off between the unhinged loss and mean absolute error while controlling beta-smoothness, and they match or exceed existing robust losses on standard noisy-label benchmarks.

Core claim

Symmetrizing the cross-entropy loss leads to a linear multi-class extension of the unhinged loss. Under suitable assumptions, this multi-class unhinged loss is the unique convex multi-class symmetric loss. It also has a fundamental local role: the linear approximation of any symmetric loss around score vectors with equal components is equivalent to the multi-class unhinged loss.

What carries the argument

The unique decomposition of any multi-class loss into a symmetric component and a class-insensitive term, which produces the multi-class unhinged loss when applied to cross-entropy.

If this is right

  • The multi-class unhinged loss supplies explicit robustness guarantees to label noise through the symmetry condition.
  • SGCE and alpha-MAE let practitioners interpolate between the unhinged loss and MAE while tuning beta-smoothness.
  • The local linear approximation property implies that the unhinged loss captures the first-order behavior of every symmetric loss near balanced score vectors.
  • Competitive accuracy on noisy-label benchmarks follows directly from using these symmetrized or interpolated losses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The decomposition technique could be applied to other base losses such as focal loss to generate additional robust variants.
  • The local approximation result suggests the unhinged loss may serve as a canonical starting point for analyzing optimization dynamics of symmetric losses.
  • Smoothness control in the interpolating losses offers a practical lever for adapting to different noise rates without changing the symmetry property.

Load-bearing premise

Any multi-class loss function admits a unique decomposition into a symmetric component and a class-insensitive term.

What would settle it

A counterexample to uniqueness: another convex multi-class loss that satisfies the symmetry condition yet differs from the multi-class unhinged loss, or an experiment in which the symmetrized losses lose accuracy under increasing label noise while non-symmetric baselines do not.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20347 by Alexandre Lemire Paquin, Brahim Chaib-draa, Philippe Gigu\`ere.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The added regularization (induced from a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Labeling a training set is often expensive and susceptible to errors, making the design of robust loss functions for label noise an important problem. The symmetry condition provides theoretical guarantees for robustness to such noise. In this work, we study a symmetrization method arising from the unique decomposition of any multi-class loss function into a symmetric component and a class-insensitive term. In particular, symmetrizing the cross-entropy loss leads to a linear multi-class extension of the unhinged loss. Unlike in the binary case, the multi-class version must have specific coefficients in order to satisfy the symmetry condition. Under suitable assumptions, we show that this multi-class unhinged loss is the unique convex multi-class symmetric loss. We also show that it has a fundamental local role: the linear approximation of any symmetric loss around score vectors with equal components is equivalent to the multi-class unhinged loss. We then introduce SGCE and alpha-MAE, two loss functions that interpolate between the multi-class unhinged loss and the Mean Absolute Error while allowing control of the beta-smoothness of the loss. Experiments on standard noisy-label benchmarks show competitive performance compared with existing robust loss functions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that any multi-class loss admits a unique decomposition into a symmetric component and a class-insensitive term; symmetrizing cross-entropy therefore yields a linear multi-class unhinged loss with specific coefficients required for symmetry; under suitable assumptions this loss is the unique convex multi-class symmetric loss; it also serves as the linear approximation to any symmetric loss near score vectors with equal components; two new interpolating losses (SGCE and alpha-MAE) are introduced that control beta-smoothness; and these losses achieve competitive performance on standard noisy-label benchmarks.

Significance. If the decomposition, uniqueness, and local-approximation results hold, the work supplies a principled route to constructing robust symmetric losses for multi-class label noise, extending the binary unhinged-loss theory with both a uniqueness theorem and an explicit local-role property. The controlled interpolations and benchmark results add immediate practical value for robust training.

major comments (2)
  1. [Decomposition statement (abstract and §2–3)] The central claim that every multi-class loss admits a unique decomposition L = L_sym + L_insens (where L_sym satisfies the symmetry condition) is asserted without an explicit definition of the function space or regularity class (e.g., continuous functions on R^K, growth conditions at infinity, or invariance under logit permutation). This assumption is load-bearing for both the uniqueness of the multi-class unhinged loss and the local linear-approximation result.
  2. [Uniqueness theorem] §4 (uniqueness theorem): the theorem is stated only “under suitable assumptions.” These assumptions must be listed explicitly in the theorem statement so that readers can verify necessity, sufficiency, and whether they exclude other candidate convex symmetric losses.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Symmetrization derivation] Notation for the multi-class unhinged loss coefficients should be introduced once with a clear table or equation block rather than scattered across the symmetrization derivation.
  2. [Experiments] The experimental section would benefit from an explicit statement of the noise-transition matrix estimation method (or confirmation that none is used) to allow direct comparison with prior robust-loss baselines.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve the rigor and clarity of the theoretical claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Decomposition statement (abstract and §2–3)] The central claim that every multi-class loss admits a unique decomposition L = L_sym + L_insens (where L_sym satisfies the symmetry condition) is asserted without an explicit definition of the function space or regularity class (e.g., continuous functions on R^K, growth conditions at infinity, or invariance under logit permutation). This assumption is load-bearing for both the uniqueness of the multi-class unhinged loss and the local linear-approximation result.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit definition of the function space is required to support the decomposition. In the revised manuscript we will define the class of loss functions under consideration (continuous maps L : R^K → R satisfying standard growth conditions at infinity and invariance under logit permutation) before stating the decomposition result. This clarification will also underpin the uniqueness and local-approximation claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Uniqueness theorem] §4 (uniqueness theorem): the theorem is stated only “under suitable assumptions.” These assumptions must be listed explicitly in the theorem statement so that readers can verify necessity, sufficiency, and whether they exclude other candidate convex symmetric losses.

    Authors: We accept that the assumptions must be stated explicitly. In the revision we will expand the theorem statement to enumerate all conditions (convexity, symmetry, domain restrictions, and any regularity requirements) so that readers can directly assess necessity, sufficiency, and the exclusion of other candidate losses. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on an asserted unique decomposition of any multi-class loss into symmetric and class-insensitive components, followed by symmetrization of cross-entropy and proofs of uniqueness and local approximation properties under stated assumptions. These steps are presented as direct mathematical consequences rather than reductions to fitted parameters, self-citations, or definitional loops; no equations equate a derived quantity to its own input by construction, and the symmetry condition is treated as an external theoretical guarantee rather than internally generated. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the symmetry condition for robustness and the unique decomposition property as foundational assumptions; the new losses introduce interpolation parameters alpha and smoothness controls.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha
    Interpolation parameter between the multi-class unhinged loss and mean absolute error in alpha-MAE
  • coefficients for multi-class unhinged loss
    Specific numerical coefficients required to satisfy the symmetry condition in the multi-class case
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Symmetry condition on loss functions provides theoretical guarantees for robustness to label noise
    Invoked as the basis for studying symmetrization
  • domain assumption Any multi-class loss function admits a unique decomposition into a symmetric component and a class-insensitive term
    Basis for the symmetrization method described

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5751 in / 1530 out tokens · 58180 ms · 2026-06-30T18:02:49.307390+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Smoothness-Based Derandomization of PAC-Bayes Bounds

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives smoothness-based PAC-Bayes bounds for deterministic predictors by bounding the Jensen gap class via Rademacher complexity, yielding flatness terms in Jacobians/Hessians, and proposes a corresponding regularize...

  2. Smoothness-Based Derandomization of PAC-Bayes Bounds

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives smoothness-based PAC-Bayes derandomization bounds for deterministic predictors using Rademacher complexity of the Jensen gap class, yielding Jacobian/Hessian flatness terms and a practical regularizer tested o...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

5 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Deep learning , Ty =

    doi: 10.1038/nature14539. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539. Wen Li, Limin Wang, Wei Li, Eirikur Agustsson, and Luc Van Gool. Webvision database: Visual learning and understanding from web data, 2017. 11 Xuefeng Li, Tongliang Liu, Bo Han, Gang Niu, and Masashi Sugiyama. Provably end-to-end label-noise learning without anchor points. In Marina Meila a...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14539 2017

  2. [2]

    Zhilu Zhang and Mert R

    URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=Sy8gdB9xx. Zhilu Zhang and Mert R. Sabuncu. Generalized cross entropy loss for training deep neural networks with noisy labels. InProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’18, page 8792–8802, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2018. Curran Associates Inc. Xiong Zhou, Xianming Liu, Ju...

    2018

  3. [3]

    Dixian Zhu, Yiming Ying, and Tianbao Yang

    URLhttps://jmlr.org/papers/v24/23-0771.html. Dixian Zhu, Yiming Ying, and Tianbao Yang. Label distributionally robust losses for multi-class classification: Consistency, robustness and adaptivity. In Andreas Krause, Emma Brunskill, Kyunghyun Cho, Barbara Engelhardt, Sivan Sabato, and Jonathan Scarlett, editors,Proceedings of the 40th International Confere...

    2023

  4. [4]

    We therefore have exactlyβ−βsym =ϕ′′(0) in this case

    We know that the symmetrization of ϕis the unhinged with β-smoothness equal to 0. We therefore have exactlyβ−βsym =ϕ′′(0) in this case. Assume that ϕ(R) = 0, ϕ(0)≥1, ϕ(z) is convex, non-increasing, and as before, its Taylor series at 0 converges on its domain, ϕ(z) is ℓ-Lipschitz and β-smooth. In order to make ϕsym(z) into a surrogate loss upper bounding ...

    2022

  5. [5]

    steplr” refers to the scheduler torch.optim.lr scheduler.StepLR with parameters “step size

    prior in the binary case) favours probability vectors with less entropy. F Regression The present paper focused on extending decomposition, symmetrization and the binary unhinged loss function to the multi-class case. It is also possible to extend these ideas to regression. Suppose that we are now trying to predict a continuous variable y∈Rand that the da...

    2016