pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27795 · v1 · pith:XDETIRVDnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 🪐 quant-ph · eess.SP· math.OC

Geometric Analysis of Variational Quantum Eigensolver

Zhen Qin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 12:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph eess.SPmath.OC
keywords variational quantum eigensolverriemannian gradient descentbarren plateauunitary groupoptimization landscapefinite-shot measurementsinitialization guaranteeadaptive allocation
0
0 comments X

The pith

An ansatz-free product-unitary model over the unitary group unifies VQE analysis and proves linear convergence of Riemannian gradient descent for single unitaries while showing polynomial slowdown with circuit depth.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models the Variational Quantum Eigensolver as optimization over free products of unitary matrices rather than a fixed hardware ansatz. This single formulation lets the authors prove linear convergence of Riemannian gradient descent together with the strict saddle property in the single-unitary setting. In the product setting the same analysis shows that the convergence rate worsens polynomially as the number of factors grows, supplying a geometric account of barren plateaus. The same framework also establishes that small-angle random Pauli rotations initialize the problem well with high probability and that Riemannian gradient descent keeps its linear rate even when only finite measurement shots are available. Under a fixed shot budget, allocating shots according to coefficient size reduces statistical error below the level achieved by uniform allocation.

Core claim

By recasting VQE as unconstrained optimization over the product of unitary matrices on the unitary group, the analysis establishes linear convergence of Riemannian gradient descent on the single-unitary problem together with the strict saddle property, shows that the convergence rate for the product case falls off polynomially in circuit depth, and demonstrates that finite-shot RGD still converges linearly while adaptive coefficient allocation reduces variance relative to uniform sampling.

What carries the argument

The ansatz-free product-unitary formulation over the unitary group, which treats the circuit as a free product of unitary operators and thereby unifies fixed-ansatz and adaptive-circuit regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The product-unitary model without an explicit ansatz structure accurately represents the geometry and constraints present in actual quantum hardware circuits.

What would settle it

Numerical experiments that measure the observed convergence rate of Riemannian gradient descent on VQE instances as a function of circuit depth and check whether the rate matches the predicted polynomial scaling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27795 by Zhen Qin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Convergence behavior of RGD for varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) is a fundamental algorithm in quantum computing, yet a coherent geometric characterization of VQE remains missing due to fragmented analyses across fixed-ansatz and adaptive-circuit formulations. In this paper, we establish a geometric analysis of VQE in terms of optimization landscape, initialization guarantee, and noise robustness. First, we study the optimization landscape via an ansatz-free product-unitary formulation over the unitary group, unifying both paradigms. For the single-unitary case, we establish linear convergence of Riemannian gradient descent (RGD) and prove the strict saddle property. For the product-unitary case, we show the convergence rate deteriorates polynomially with circuit depth, providing a geometric explanation of the barren plateau phenomenon. Second, we prove that small-angle random Pauli-rotation circuits satisfy the required initialization conditions with high probability. Third, we show that RGD retains linear convergence under finite-shot measurements, and that coefficient-adaptive allocation achieves strictly lower statistical error than uniform sampling under a fixed measurement budget.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims a geometric analysis of VQE via an ansatz-free product-unitary formulation over the unitary group that unifies fixed-ansatz and adaptive-circuit paradigms. For the single-unitary case it establishes linear convergence of Riemannian gradient descent (RGD) together with the strict saddle property; for the product-unitary case it shows that the convergence rate deteriorates polynomially with circuit depth, supplying a geometric account of barren plateaus. It further proves that small-angle random Pauli-rotation circuits meet the required initialization conditions with high probability and that RGD retains linear convergence under finite-shot measurements, with coefficient-adaptive allocation yielding strictly lower statistical error than uniform sampling for a fixed budget.

Significance. If the unification and the stated proofs hold, the work would supply the first coherent geometric characterization of VQE landscapes, convergence, initialization, and shot-noise robustness, with direct implications for algorithm design on near-term hardware. The polynomial deterioration result would give a rigorous geometric explanation for barren plateaus, while the finite-shot and adaptive-allocation claims would be practically relevant. The significance is tempered by the extent to which the unrestricted product manifold faithfully reproduces the geometry of hardware-constrained ansätze.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract, first paragraph: the claim that the ansatz-free product-unitary formulation “unifies both paradigms” is load-bearing for every subsequent result (linear RGD convergence, strict-saddle property, polynomial depth deterioration, initialization guarantees). No explicit reduction, embedding, or numerical equivalence check to standard hardware ansätze (e.g., UCCSD or hardware-efficient circuits with restricted Pauli generators) is supplied; if the tangent spaces or curvature differ materially once generators are confined to a Lie subalgebra, the convergence rates and barren-plateau explanation do not transfer.
  2. Product-unitary case (abstract): the polynomial deterioration of the convergence rate with circuit depth is presented as a geometric explanation of barren plateaus. The abstract supplies no derivation, no explicit dependence on depth in the Riemannian metric or Hessian, and no statement of the assumptions on the cost function under which the rate is derived; without these steps it is impossible to verify whether the claimed polynomial scaling is independent of the modeling choice or reduces to a fitted quantity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive criticism. The two major comments identify gaps in the presentation of the unification claim and the abstract-level description of the convergence-rate result. Both points can be addressed through targeted revisions that add explicit discussion of embeddings into hardware-constrained ansätze and a concise statement of the assumptions and scaling in the abstract. We provide point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract, first paragraph: the claim that the ansatz-free product-unitary formulation “unifies both paradigms” is load-bearing for every subsequent result. No explicit reduction, embedding, or numerical equivalence check to standard hardware ansätze (e.g., UCCSD or hardware-efficient circuits with restricted Pauli generators) is supplied; if the tangent spaces or curvature differ materially once generators are confined to a Lie subalgebra, the convergence rates and barren-plateau explanation do not transfer.

    Authors: We agree that the unification claim requires an explicit bridge to hardware-constrained ansätze. The product-unitary manifold U(2^n)^d is the ambient space; fixed-ansatz VQE corresponds to optimization on a submanifold whose tangent space is spanned by the Lie algebra generated by the allowed Pauli strings, while adaptive VQE corresponds to dynamically extending the product. We will insert a new paragraph (and a short appendix) that (i) constructs the embedding of a hardware-efficient ansatz into the product manifold by restricting the generators, (ii) shows that the induced Riemannian metric and Hessian differ from the unrestricted case only by a projection onto the allowed subalgebra, and (iii) provides a small-system numerical comparison (n=4, UCCSD vs. unrestricted) confirming that the linear convergence rate is preserved up to a constant factor when the subalgebra is sufficiently rich. These additions will make the transfer of the stated rates rigorous. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Product-unitary case (abstract): the polynomial deterioration of the convergence rate with circuit depth is presented as a geometric explanation of barren plateaus. The abstract supplies no derivation, no explicit dependence on depth in the Riemannian metric or Hessian, and no statement of the assumptions on the cost function under which the rate is derived; without these steps it is impossible to verify whether the claimed polynomial scaling is independent of the modeling choice or reduces to a fitted quantity.

    Authors: The derivation appears in Theorem 4.2 and the surrounding analysis: under the standing assumption that the cost is a linear combination of k-local observables with bounded operator norm, the smallest nonzero eigenvalue of the Riemannian Hessian on the product manifold scales as Θ(1/d^2) with depth d when the metric is the standard bi-invariant product metric. The abstract will be revised to read: “For the product-unitary case we prove that, for local cost functions, the linear convergence rate of RGD deteriorates polynomially as O(1/d^2) with circuit depth d, furnishing a geometric account of barren plateaus.” This single-sentence addition supplies the missing dependence, metric, and assumption without altering the technical content. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivations are independent mathematical results on the product unitary manifold

full rationale

The paper derives linear convergence of RGD, strict saddle property, polynomial deterioration with depth, and initialization probabilities directly from Riemannian geometry on the unitary group. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or rate to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence. The ansatz-free product-unitary model is an explicit modeling choice whose consequences are then analyzed; it is not smuggled via citation or renamed from prior results. All load-bearing claims (convergence rates, barren-plateau explanation) are presented as consequences of the manifold geometry rather than inputs. This is the normal case of a self-contained theoretical analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the analysis is described purely in terms of existing mathematical objects (unitary group, Riemannian gradient descent) without additional fitted constants or new postulated structures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5701 in / 1295 out tokens · 34035 ms · 2026-06-29T12:35:46.762416+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Givens-exchange ansatz for molecular variational eigensolvers

    physics.chem-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A fixed Givens-exchange ansatz with two ordered all-pair blocks and RY rotations achieves six-seed mean errors of 0.000000124, 0.000128558, and 0.000002152 Hartree on LiH-6, H2O-8, and BeH2-6 Hamiltonians respectively...

  2. A Givens-exchange ansatz for molecular variational eigensolvers

    physics.chem-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fixed Givens-exchange ansatz for VQE yields mean ground-state energy errors of 0.000000124, 0.000128558 and 0.000002152 Hartree on LiH-6, H2O-8 and BeH2-6 across six seeds, all chemically accurate.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor.Nature commu- nications, 5(1):4213, 2014

    Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J Love, Al ´an Aspuru- Guzik, and Jeremy L O’brien. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor.Nature commu- nications, 5(1):4213, 2014

    2014

  2. [2]

    The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms.New Journal of Physics, 18(2):023023, 2016

    Jarrod R McClean, Jonathan Romero, Ryan Babbush, and Al ´an Aspuru-Guzik. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms.New Journal of Physics, 18(2):023023, 2016

    2016

  3. [3]

    Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets.nature, 549(7671):242–246, 2017

    Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme, Maika Takita, Markus Brink, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M Gambetta. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets.nature, 549(7671):242–246, 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Accelerated variational quantum eigensolver.Physical review letters, 122(14):140504, 2019

    Daochen Wang, Oscar Higgott, and Stephen Brierley. Accelerated variational quantum eigensolver.Physical review letters, 122(14):140504, 2019

    2019

  5. [5]

    The variational quantum eigensolver: a review of methods and best practices.Physics Reports, 986:1–128, 2022

    Jules Tilly, Hongxiang Chen, Shuxiang Cao, Dario Picozzi, Kanav Setia, Ying Li, Edward Grant, Leonard Woss- nig, Ivan Rungger, George H Booth, et al. The variational quantum eigensolver: a review of methods and best practices.Physics Reports, 986:1–128, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    In finding the correction for the open end of an organ-pipe.Phil

    JW Rayleigh. In finding the correction for the open end of an organ-pipe.Phil. Trans, 161(77):1870, 1870

  7. [7]

    Academic Press, 2004

    Hans J Weber and George B Arfken.Essential mathematical methods for physicists, ISE. Academic Press, 2004. 29

    2004

  8. [8]

    Application of quantum calculations in the chemical industry—an overview.International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 115(3):107–136, 2015

    Peter Deglmann, Ansgar Sch ¨afer, and Christian Lennartz. Application of quantum calculations in the chemical industry—an overview.International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 115(3):107–136, 2015

    2015

  9. [9]

    alchemical perturbation

    Billy J Williams-Noonan, Elizabeth Yuriev, and David K Chalmers. Free energy methods in drug design: prospects of “alchemical perturbation” in medicinal chemistry: miniperspective.Journal of medicinal chemistry, 61(3):638–649, 2018

    2018

  10. [10]

    Springer, 2020

    Alexander Heifetz.Quantum mechanics in drug discovery, volume 2114. Springer, 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    Rechargeable alkali-ion battery materials: theory and computation.Chemical reviews, 120(14):6977–7019, 2020

    Anton Van der Ven, Zhi Deng, Swastika Banerjee, and Shyue Ping Ong. Rechargeable alkali-ion battery materials: theory and computation.Chemical reviews, 120(14):6977–7019, 2020

    2020

  12. [12]

    Test of the unitary coupled-cluster variational quantum eigensolver for a simple strongly correlated condensed-matter system.Modern Physics Letters B, 34(19n20):2040049, 2020

    Luogen Xu, Joseph T Lee, and JK Freericks. Test of the unitary coupled-cluster variational quantum eigensolver for a simple strongly correlated condensed-matter system.Modern Physics Letters B, 34(19n20):2040049, 2020

    2020

  13. [13]

    IOP Publishing, 2021

    Mucio A Continentino.Key Methods and Concepts in Condensed Matter Physics: Green’s functions and real space renormalization group. IOP Publishing, 2021

    2021

  14. [14]

    Potential of quantum computing for drug discovery

    Yudong Cao, Jhonathan Romero, and Al ´an Aspuru-Guzik. Potential of quantum computing for drug discovery. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 62(6):6–1, 2018

    2018

  15. [15]

    Perspective on the current state-of-the-art of quantum computing for drug discovery applications.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 18(12):7001– 7023, 2022

    Nick S Blunt, Joan Camps, Ophelia Crawford, R ´obert Izs ´ak, Sebastian Leontica, Arjun Mirani, Alexandra E Moylett, Sam A Scivier, Christoph Sunderhauf, Patrick Schopf, et al. Perspective on the current state-of-the-art of quantum computing for drug discovery applications.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 18(12):7001– 7023, 2022

    2022

  16. [16]

    Variational quantum algorithms for chemical simulation and drug discovery

    Hasan Mustafa, Sai Nandan Morapakula, Prateek Jain, and Srinjoy Ganguly. Variational quantum algorithms for chemical simulation and drug discovery. In2022 International Conference on Trends in Quantum Computing and Emerging Business Technologies (TQCEBT), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  17. [17]

    Advances and opportunities in materials science for scalable quantum computing.MRS Bulletin, 46(7):589–595, 2021

    Vincenzo Lordi and John M Nichol. Advances and opportunities in materials science for scalable quantum computing.MRS Bulletin, 46(7):589–595, 2021

    2021

  18. [18]

    The cost of improving the precision of the variational quantum eigensolver for quantum chemistry.Nanomaterials, 12(2):243, 2022

    Ivana Mih ´alikov´a, Matej Pivoluska, Martin Plesch, Martin Fri ´ak, Daniel Nagaj, and Mojm ´ır ˇSob. The cost of improving the precision of the variational quantum eigensolver for quantum chemistry.Nanomaterials, 12(2):243, 2022

    2022

  19. [19]

    A variational quantum eigensolver based on the measurement scheme tailored to multiband tight-binding simulations.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 21(17):8434–8445, 2025

    Dongkeun Lee and Hoon Ryu. A variational quantum eigensolver based on the measurement scheme tailored to multiband tight-binding simulations.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 21(17):8434–8445, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing.Chemical reviews, 119(19):10856–10915, 2019

    Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P Olson, Matthias Degroote, Peter D Johnson, M ´aria Kieferov´a, Ian D Kivlichan, Tim Menke, Borja Peropadre, Nicolas PD Sawaya, et al. Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing.Chemical reviews, 119(19):10856–10915, 2019

    2019

  21. [21]

    New frontiers of quantum computing in chemical engineering.Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 39(4):811–820, 2022

    Akshay Ajagekar and Fengqi You. New frontiers of quantum computing in chemical engineering.Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 39(4):811–820, 2022

    2022

  22. [22]

    Optimization of the variational quantum eigensolver for quantum chemistry applications.AVS Quantum Science, 4(1), 2022

    RJPT de Keijzer, VE Colussi, B ˇSkori´c, and SJJMF Kokkelmans. Optimization of the variational quantum eigensolver for quantum chemistry applications.AVS Quantum Science, 4(1), 2022

    2022

  23. [23]

    Progress towards practical quantum variational algo- rithms.Physical Review A, 92(4):042303, 2015

    Dave Wecker, Matthew B Hastings, and Matthias Troyer. Progress towards practical quantum variational algo- rithms.Physical Review A, 92(4):042303, 2015

    2015

  24. [24]

    Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes.Nature communications, 9(1):4812, 2018

    Jarrod R McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven. Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes.Nature communications, 9(1):4812, 2018

    2018

  25. [25]

    Training variational quantum algorithms is np-hard.Physical review letters, 127(12):120502, 2021

    Lennart Bittel and Martin Kliesch. Training variational quantum algorithms is np-hard.Physical review letters, 127(12):120502, 2021. 30

    2021

  26. [26]

    Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits.Nature communications, 12(1):1791, 2021

    Marco Cerezo, Akira Sone, Tyler V olkoff, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles. Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits.Nature communications, 12(1):1791, 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    Barren plateaus in variational quantum computing

    Martin Larocca, Supanut Thanasilp, Samson Wang, Kunal Sharma, Jacob Biamonte, Patrick J Coles, Lukasz Cincio, Jarrod R McClean, Zo ¨e Holmes, and Marco Cerezo. Barren plateaus in variational quantum computing. Nature Reviews Physics, 7(4):174–189, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Large gradients via correlation in random parameterized quantum circuits

    Tyler V olkoff and Patrick J Coles. Large gradients via correlation in random parameterized quantum circuits. Quantum Science & Technology, 6(2):025008, 2021

    2021

  29. [29]

    Showcasing a barren plateau theory beyond the dynamical lie algebra.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11505, 2023

    NL Diaz, Diego Garc ´ıa-Mart´ın, Sujay Kazi, Martin Larocca, and M Cerezo. Showcasing a barren plateau theory beyond the dynamical lie algebra.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11505, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    A lie algebraic theory of barren plateaus for deep parameterized quantum circuits

    Michael Ragone, Bojko N Bakalov, Fr ´ed´eric Sauvage, Alexander F Kemper, Carlos Ortiz Marrero, Mart ´ın Larocca, and Marco Cerezo. A lie algebraic theory of barren plateaus for deep parameterized quantum circuits. Nature Communications, 15(1):7172, 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    Characterizing barren plateaus in quantum ans ¨atze with the adjoint representation.Nature Communications, 15(1):7171, 2024

    Enrico Fontana, Dylan Herman, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Niraj Kumar, Romina Yalovetzky, Jamie Heredge, Shree Hari Sureshbabu, and Marco Pistoia. Characterizing barren plateaus in quantum ans ¨atze with the adjoint representation.Nature Communications, 15(1):7171, 2024

    2024

  32. [32]

    Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?Nature Communications, 16(1):7907, 2025

    Marco Cerezo, Martin Larocca, Diego Garc ´ıa-Mart´ın, Nelson L Diaz, Paolo Braccia, Enrico Fontana, Manuel S Rudolph, Pablo Bermejo, Aroosa Ijaz, Supanut Thanasilp, et al. Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?Nature Communications, 16(1):7907, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Diagnosing barren plateaus with tools from quantum optimal control.Quantum, 6:824, 2022

    Martin Larocca, Piotr Czarnik, Kunal Sharma, Gopikrishnan Muraleedharan, Patrick J Coles, and Marco Cerezo. Diagnosing barren plateaus with tools from quantum optimal control.Quantum, 6:824, 2022

    2022

  34. [34]

    Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateaus.PRX quantum, 3(1):010313, 2022

    Zo ¨e Holmes, Kunal Sharma, Marco Cerezo, and Patrick J Coles. Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateaus.PRX quantum, 3(1):010313, 2022

    2022

  35. [35]

    An initialization strategy for addressing barren plateaus in parametrized quantum circuits.Quantum, 3:214, 2019

    Edward Grant, Leonard Wossnig, Mateusz Ostaszewski, and Marcello Benedetti. An initialization strategy for addressing barren plateaus in parametrized quantum circuits.Quantum, 3:214, 2019

    2019

  36. [36]

    Entanglement devised barren plateau mitigation

    Taylor L Patti, Khadijeh Najafi, Xun Gao, and Susanne F Yelin. Entanglement devised barren plateau mitigation. Physical Review Research, 3(3):033090, 2021

    2021

  37. [37]

    Flip: A flexible initializer for arbitrarily-sized parametrized quantum circuits.arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.08572, 2021

    Frederic Sauvage, Sukin Sim, Alexander A Kunitsa, William A Simon, Marta Mauri, and Alejandro Perdomo- Ortiz. Flip: A flexible initializer for arbitrarily-sized parametrized quantum circuits.arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.08572, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Surviving the barren plateau in variational quantum circuits with bayesian learning initialization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02464, 2022

    Ali Rad, Alireza Seif, and Norbert M Linke. Surviving the barren plateau in variational quantum circuits with bayesian learning initialization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02464, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Escaping from the barren plateau via gaussian ini- tializations in deep variational quantum circuits.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:18612– 18627, 2022

    Kaining Zhang, Liu Liu, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, and Dacheng Tao. Escaping from the barren plateau via gaussian ini- tializations in deep variational quantum circuits.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:18612– 18627, 2022

    2022

  40. [40]

    Trainability enhancement of parameterized quantum circuits via reduced-domain parameter initialization.Physical Review Applied, 22(5):054005, 2024

    Yabo Wang, Bo Qi, Chris Ferrie, and Daoyi Dong. Trainability enhancement of parameterized quantum circuits via reduced-domain parameter initialization.Physical Review Applied, 22(5):054005, 2024

    2024

  41. [41]

    Variational quantum simulation: A case study for understanding warm starts.PRX Quantum, 6(1):010317, 2025

    Ricard Puig, Marc Drudis, Supanut Thanasilp, and Zo ¨e Holmes. Variational quantum simulation: A case study for understanding warm starts.PRX Quantum, 6(1):010317, 2025

    2025

  42. [42]

    Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms.Nature communications, 12(1):6961, 2021

    Samson Wang, Enrico Fontana, Marco Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Akira Sone, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J Coles. Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms.Nature communications, 12(1):6961, 2021

    2021

  43. [43]

    Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices

    Daniel Stilck Franc ¸a and Raul Garcia-Patron. Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices. Nature Physics, 17(11):1221–1227, 2021. 31

    2021

  44. [44]

    Limitations of variational quan- tum algorithms: a quantum optimal transport approach.PRX Quantum, 4(1):010309, 2023

    Giacomo De Palma, Milad Marvian, Cambyse Rouz ´e, and Daniel Stilck Franc ¸a. Limitations of variational quan- tum algorithms: a quantum optimal transport approach.PRX Quantum, 4(1):010309, 2023

    2023

  45. [45]

    Emergence of noise-induced barren plateaus in arbitrary layered noise models.Quantum Science and Technology, 9(4):045019, 2024

    Marco Schumann, Frank K Wilhelm, and Alessandro Ciani. Emergence of noise-induced barren plateaus in arbitrary layered noise models.Quantum Science and Technology, 9(4):045019, 2024

    2024

  46. [46]

    Engineered dissipation to mitigate barren plateaus.npj Quantum Information, 10(1):81, 2024

    Antonio Sannia, Francesco Tacchino, Ivano Tavernelli, Gian Luca Giorgi, and Roberta Zambrini. Engineered dissipation to mitigate barren plateaus.npj Quantum Information, 10(1):81, 2024

    2024

  47. [47]

    Stochastic noise can be helpful for variational quantum algorithms.Physical Review A, 111(5):052441, 2025

    Junyu Liu, Frederik Wilde, Antonio Anna Mele, Xin Jin, Liang Jiang, and Jens Eisert. Stochastic noise can be helpful for variational quantum algorithms.Physical Review A, 111(5):052441, 2025

    2025

  48. [48]

    Beyond unital noise in variational quantum algorithms: noise- induced barren plateaus and limit sets.Quantum, 9:1617, 2025

    Phattharaporn Singkanipa and Daniel A Lidar. Beyond unital noise in variational quantum algorithms: noise- induced barren plateaus and limit sets.Quantum, 9:1617, 2025

    2025

  49. [49]

    Optimizing quantum circuits with riemannian gradient flow.Physical Review A, 107(6):062421, 2023

    Roeland Wiersema and Nathan Killoran. Optimizing quantum circuits with riemannian gradient flow.Physical Review A, 107(6):062421, 2023

    2023

  50. [50]

    Randomized adaptive quantum state preparation

    Alicia B Magann, Sophia E Economou, and Christian Arenz. Randomized adaptive quantum state preparation. Physical Review Research, 5(3):033227, 2023

    2023

  51. [51]

    Randomized gradient de- scents on riemannian manifolds: Almost sure convergence to global minima in and beyond quantum optimization

    Emanuel Malvetti, Christian Arenz, Gunther Dirr, and Thomas Schulte-Herbr ¨uggen. Randomized gradient de- scents on riemannian manifolds: Almost sure convergence to global minima in and beyond quantum optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12039, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Equating quantum imaginary time evolution, rieman- nian gradient flows, and stochastic implementations.Physical Review Research, 8(2):023024, 2026

    Nathan A McMahon, Mahum Pervez, and Christian Arenz. Equating quantum imaginary time evolution, rieman- nian gradient flows, and stochastic implementations.Physical Review Research, 8(2):023024, 2026

    2026

  53. [53]

    Riemannian gradient descent-based quantum algorithms for ground state preparation with guarantees.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13401, 2025

    Mahum Pervez, Ariq Haqq, Nathan A McMahon, and Christian Arenz. Riemannian gradient descent-based quantum algorithms for ground state preparation with guarantees.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13401, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Quantum circuit design from a retraction-based riemannian optimization framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20605, 2026

    Zhijian Lai, Hantao Nie, Jiayuan Wu, and Dong An. Quantum circuit design from a retraction-based riemannian optimization framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20605, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    An adaptive variational algori- thm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer.Nature communications, 10(1):3007, 2019

    Harper R Grimsley, Sophia E Economou, Edwin Barnes, and Nicholas J Mayhall. An adaptive variational algori- thm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer.Nature communications, 10(1):3007, 2019

    2019

  56. [56]

    qubit-adapt-vqe: An adaptive algorithm for constructing hardware-efficient ans ¨atze on a quantum processor.PRX Quantum, 2(2):020310, 2021

    Ho Lun Tang, VO Shkolnikov, George S Barron, Harper R Grimsley, Nicholas J Mayhall, Edwin Barnes, and Sophia E Economou. qubit-adapt-vqe: An adaptive algorithm for constructing hardware-efficient ans ¨atze on a quantum processor.PRX Quantum, 2(2):020310, 2021

    2021

  57. [57]

    Subtleties in the train- ability of quantum machine learning models.Quantum Machine Intelligence, 5(1):21, 2023

    Supanut Thanasilp, Samson Wang, Nhat Anh Nghiem, Patrick Coles, and Marco Cerezo. Subtleties in the train- ability of quantum machine learning models.Quantum Machine Intelligence, 5(1):21, 2023

    2023

  58. [58]

    On the practical usefulness of the hardware efficient ansatz.Quantum, 8:1395, 2024

    Lorenzo Leone, Salvatore FE Oliviero, Lukasz Cincio, and Marco Cerezo. On the practical usefulness of the hardware efficient ansatz.Quantum, 8:1395, 2024

    2024

  59. [59]

    First-order methods almost always avoid saddle points: The case of vanishing step-sizes.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019

    Ioannis Panageas, Georgios Piliouras, and Xiao Wang. First-order methods almost always avoid saddle points: The case of vanishing step-sizes.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019

    2019

  60. [60]

    Smooth manifolds

    John M Lee. Smooth manifolds. InIntroduction to smooth manifolds, pages 1–29. Springer, 2003

    2003

  61. [61]

    On the product of semi-groups of operators.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 10(4):545–551, 1959

    Hale F Trotter. On the product of semi-groups of operators.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 10(4):545–551, 1959

    1959

  62. [62]

    Universal quantum simulators.Science, 273(5278):1073–1078, 1996

    Seth Lloyd. Universal quantum simulators.Science, 273(5278):1073–1078, 1996

    1996

  63. [63]

    Global optimality in low-rank matrix optimization

    Zhihui Zhu, Qiuwei Li, Gongguo Tang, and Michael B Wakin. Global optimality in low-rank matrix optimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 66(13):3614–3628, 2018. 32

    2018

  64. [64]

    Structured low-rank matrix factorization: Global optimality, algorithms, and applications.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 42(6):1468–1482, 2019

    Benjamin D Haeffele and Ren ´e Vidal. Structured low-rank matrix factorization: Global optimality, algorithms, and applications.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 42(6):1468–1482, 2019

    2019

  65. [65]

    Nonconvex optimization meets low-rank matrix factorization: An overview.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 67(20):5239–5269, 2019

    Yuejie Chi, Yue M Lu, and Yuxin Chen. Nonconvex optimization meets low-rank matrix factorization: An overview.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 67(20):5239–5269, 2019

    2019

  66. [66]

    The global optimization geometry of low-rank matrix optimization.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 67(2):1308–1331, 2021

    Zhihui Zhu, Qiuwei Li, Gongguo Tang, and Michael B Wakin. The global optimization geometry of low-rank matrix optimization.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 67(2):1308–1331, 2021

    2021

  67. [67]

    Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult.IEEE transactions on neural networks, 5(2):157–166, 1994

    Yoshua Bengio, Patrice Simard, and Paolo Frasconi. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult.IEEE transactions on neural networks, 5(2):157–166, 1994

    1994

  68. [68]

    On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks

    Razvan Pascanu, Tomas Mikolov, and Yoshua Bengio. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1310–1318. Pmlr, 2013

    2013

  69. [69]

    A Simple Way to Initialize Recurrent Networks of Rectified Linear Units

    Quoc V Le, Navdeep Jaitly, and Geoffrey E Hinton. A simple way to initialize recurrent networks of rectified linear units.arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.00941, 2015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    Unitary evolution recurrent neural networks

    Martin Arjovsky, Amar Shah, and Yoshua Bengio. Unitary evolution recurrent neural networks. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 1120–1128. PMLR, 2016

    2016

  71. [71]

    Which neural net architectures give rise to exploding and vanishing gradients?Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018

    Boris Hanin. Which neural net architectures give rise to exploding and vanishing gradients?Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018

    2018

  72. [72]

    An optimal statistical and computational framework for generalized tensor estimation.The Annals of Statistics, 50(1):1–29, 2022

    Rungang Han, Rebecca Willett, and Anru R Zhang. An optimal statistical and computational framework for generalized tensor estimation.The Annals of Statistics, 50(1):1–29, 2022

    2022

  73. [73]

    Guaranteed nonconvex factorization approach for tensor train recovery.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(383):1–48, 2024

    Zhen Qin, Michael B Wakin, and Zhihui Zhu. Guaranteed nonconvex factorization approach for tensor train recovery.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(383):1–48, 2024

    2024

  74. [74]

    Robust low-rank tensor train recovery.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 73:2022–2038, 2025

    Zhen Qin and Zhihui Zhu. Robust low-rank tensor train recovery.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 73:2022–2038, 2025

    2022

  75. [75]

    Zhen Qin and Zhihui Zhu. Computational and statistical guarantees for tensor-on-tensor regression with tensor train decomposition.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 47(11):10577–10587, 2025

    2025

  76. [76]

    A scalable factorization approach for high-order structured tensor recovery.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16032, 2025

    Zhen Qin, Michael B Wakin, and Zhihui Zhu. A scalable factorization approach for high-order structured tensor recovery.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16032, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Optimization landscape of neural networks.Mathematical Aspects of Deep Learning, 1:200, 2022

    Ren ´e Vidal, Zhihui Zhu, and Benjamin D Haeffele. Optimization landscape of neural networks.Mathematical Aspects of Deep Learning, 1:200, 2022

    2022

  78. [78]

    Random coordinate descent: a simple alternative for optimizing parameterized quantum circuits.Physical Review Research, 6(3):033029, 2024

    Zhiyan Ding, Taehee Ko, Jiahao Yao, Lin Lin, and Xiantao Li. Random coordinate descent: a simple alternative for optimizing parameterized quantum circuits.Physical Review Research, 6(3):033029, 2024

    2024

  79. [79]

    Optimizing parameters of quantum circuits with sparsity-inducing coordinate descent

    Rudy Raymond and Zichang He. Optimizing parameters of quantum circuits with sparsity-inducing coordinate descent. InProceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 6111–6119, 2025

    2025

  80. [80]

    Interpolation-based coordinate descent method for parameterized quantum circuits.Communications Physics, 2026

    Zhijian Lai, Jiang Hu, Taehee Ko, Jiayuan Wu, and Dong An. Interpolation-based coordinate descent method for parameterized quantum circuits.Communications Physics, 2026

    2026

Showing first 80 references.