pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10594 · v1 · pith:52QZYAY3new · submitted 2026-06-09 · 💻 cs.CV

Segment and Select: Vision-Language Segmentation in 3D Scenarios

Yulin Chen , Zhihang Zhong , Yuenan Hou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 13:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords 3D vision-language segmentationmask candidate generatorSemantic-Spatial SelectorLoopback Verification ModuleScanNetMatterport3Dsuperpoint alternatives
0
0 comments X

The pith

SEGA3D segments 3D objects from language by selecting fine-grained mask candidates without superpoints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces SEGA3D as a new paradigm for segmenting target objects in 3D scenes using linguistic instructions. It avoids the limitations of coarse superpoint representations by generating fine-grained categorical mask candidates directly from visual data. An LLM processes the language and visual features to provide semantic and spatial information, which the Semantic-Spatial Selector uses to rank candidates, followed by verification in the Loopback Verification Module. This results in higher performance on benchmarks, exceeding previous best results by 8.3 mIoU on ScanNet and 5.3 mIoU on Matterport3D. Readers would care because it promises more accurate segmentation with cleaner object boundaries in 3D vision-language tasks.

Core claim

Our SEGA3D paradigm directly operates on the fine-grained visual information and is free from the superpoint dependency. Specifically, we first leverage a mask candidate generator to provide fine-grained categorical mask candidates, substantially improving the quality of candidate masks over the superpoint counterparts. Then, a Large Language Model (LLM) is utilized to generate the semantic and spatial information based on the linguistic description and visual features. The LLM output and visual features are fed to the Semantic-Spatial Selector (SSS) to produce the top-ranking mask candidates. Eventually, the Loopback Verification Module (LVM) is designed to yield the segmentation mask from

What carries the argument

The mask candidate generator providing fine-grained categorical mask candidates, which substantially improves quality over superpoint counterparts, along with the Semantic-Spatial Selector and Loopback Verification Module.

If this is right

  • Yields segmentation masks with improved quality and fewer messy boundaries.
  • Achieves higher mIoU scores on ScanNet and Matterport3D than prior superpoint-based approaches.
  • Allows incorporation of both semantic and spatial information from the query via the LLM.
  • Enables direct use of fine-grained visual features without superpoint coarsening.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mask candidate generator can be made even more accurate, segmentation performance could improve further on complex scenes.
  • This selection-based approach might inspire similar methods in 2D vision-language tasks.
  • The reliance on LLM could be tested for handling more ambiguous or complex language instructions.

Load-bearing premise

The mask candidate generator produces substantially higher-quality categorical mask candidates than superpoint-based methods, which is presented as the key enabler of the reported performance gains.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of mask quality metrics showing the generator does not produce substantially better candidates than superpoint methods, or ablation results where performance gains vanish when swapping the generator, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10594 by Yuenan Hou, Yulin Chen, Zhihang Zhong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visual comparison between the superpoint representation and our candidate representation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Framework overview. The model constructs a candidate bank from the input point cloud, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the Semantic-Spatial Selector. The semantic matching branch produces base [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of Loopback Verification. Candidate Mask Refinement refines each selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative results on 3D referring segmentation and 3D reasoning segmentation. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

3D vision-language segmentation aims to segment target objects in 3D scenarios according to the linguistic instructions and visual observations. Prior art heavily relies on the coarse superpoint representation to reduce the computation complexity, which suffers from poor segmentation quality and messy object boundaries. In this paper, we propose the SEGment-And-select (SEGA3D) paradigm for 3D visionlanguage segmentation that directly operates on the fine-grained visual information and is free from the superpoint dependency. Specifically, we first leverage a mask candidate generator to provide fine-grained categorical mask candidates, substantially improving the quality of candidate masks over the superpoint counterparts. Then, a Large Language Model (LLM) is utilized to generate the semantic and spatial information based on the linguistic description and visual features. The LLM output and visual features are fed to the Semantic-Spatial Selector (SSS) to produce the top-ranking mask candidates. Eventually, the Loopback Verification Module (LVM) is designed to yield the segmentation mask from the selected candidate masks. Our SEGA3D attains competitive performance on ScanRefer, ScanNet and Matterport3D benchmarks. Notably, our SEGA3D surpasses the top-performing counterpart by 8.3 mIoU and 5.3 mIoU on ScanNet and Matterport3D, respectively. Codes will be available upon publication.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the SEGA3D paradigm for 3D vision-language segmentation. It replaces coarse superpoint representations with a mask candidate generator that produces fine-grained categorical mask candidates, then uses an LLM to derive semantic and spatial information from linguistic descriptions and visual features, a Semantic-Spatial Selector (SSS) to rank top candidates, and a Loopback Verification Module (LVM) to output the final mask. The work reports competitive results on ScanRefer, ScanNet, and Matterport3D, with gains of 8.3 mIoU on ScanNet and 5.3 mIoU on Matterport3D over prior top methods.

Significance. If the performance gains are substantiated by evidence that the mask generator indeed yields substantially higher-quality candidates than superpoints, the work would be significant for the field. It offers a concrete alternative to superpoint-based pipelines and demonstrates a modular LLM-plus-selector architecture that could improve boundary precision in 3D VL tasks.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim that SEGA3D 'surpasses the top-performing counterpart by 8.3 mIoU' on ScanNet is explicitly attributed to the mask candidate generator producing 'substantially' better fine-grained categorical masks than superpoint methods. No candidate-level metrics (recall, boundary F-score, object coverage) or ablation that isolates the generator while holding the LLM/SSS/LVM fixed are referenced, leaving the central methodological premise unsupported.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the constructive review. We appreciate the referee's focus on substantiating the central claim regarding the mask candidate generator. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim that SEGA3D 'surpasses the top-performing counterpart by 8.3 mIoU' on ScanNet is explicitly attributed to the mask candidate generator producing 'substantially' better fine-grained categorical masks than superpoint methods. No candidate-level metrics (recall, boundary F-score, object coverage) or ablation that isolates the generator while holding the LLM/SSS/LVM fixed are referenced, leaving the central methodological premise unsupported.

    Authors: We agree the abstract's attribution would be strengthened by direct evidence. The manuscript reports end-to-end gains, but does not include the requested candidate-level metrics or isolating ablation. In revision we will add: (1) quantitative comparison of mask candidates vs. superpoints using recall, boundary F-score, and object coverage; (2) an ablation holding LLM/SSS/LVM fixed and varying only the generator. These additions will directly support the premise and the reported significance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical benchmark claims rest on external data rather than internal re-derivation

full rationale

The paper describes an architectural pipeline (mask candidate generator feeding LLM/SSS/LVM) whose headline performance numbers are obtained by direct comparison against prior methods on the fixed external benchmarks ScanRefer, ScanNet and Matterport3D. No equations, fitted parameters, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text; the central methodological claim is therefore an empirical assertion about mask quality rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. Self-citations are not invoked as load-bearing support for any result. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only text supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all technical details are absent.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5772 in / 1102 out tokens · 17224 ms · 2026-06-27T13:42:08.045336+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Heterogeneous and Adept Snapshot Distillation for 3D Semantic Segmentation

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    HAS-KD combines information-oriented heterogeneous distillation from multi-modal models with adept snapshot distillation from training checkpoints to reach SOTA 3D semantic segmentation on ScanNetV2 and S3DIS without ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Scanrefer: 3d object localization in rgb-d scans using natural language

    Dave Zhenyu Chen, Angel X Chang, and Matthias Nießner. Scanrefer: 3d object localization in rgb-d scans using natural language. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 202–221. Springer, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    Text-guided graph neural networks for referring 3d instance segmentation

    Pin-Hao Huang, Han-Hung Lee, Hwann-Tzong Chen, and Tyng-Luh Liu. Text-guided graph neural networks for referring 3d instance segmentation. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 35, pages 1610–1618, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    X-refseg3d: Enhancing referring 3d instance segmentation via structured cross-modal graph neural networks

    Zhipeng Qian, Yiwei Ma, Jiayi Ji, and Xiaoshuai Sun. X-refseg3d: Enhancing referring 3d instance segmentation via structured cross-modal graph neural networks. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 38, pages 4551–4559, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    3d-stmn: Dependency-driven superpoint-text matching network for end-to-end 3d referring expression segmentation

    Changli Wu, Yiwei Ma, Qi Chen, Haowei Wang, Gen Luo, Jiayi Ji, and Xiaoshuai Sun. 3d-stmn: Dependency-driven superpoint-text matching network for end-to-end 3d referring expression segmentation. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 5940–5948, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Reason3d: Searching and reasoning 3d segmentation via large language model

    Kuan-Chih Huang, Xiangtai Li, Lu Qi, Shuicheng Yan, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Reason3d: Searching and reasoning 3d segmentation via large language model. In2025 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pages 1177–1186. IEEE, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    3d-llm: Injecting the 3d world into large language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:20482–20494, 2023

    Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, and Chuang Gan. 3d-llm: Injecting the 3d world into large language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:20482–20494, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Ll3da: Visual interactive instruction tuning for omni-3d understanding reasoning and planning

    Sijin Chen, Xin Chen, Chi Zhang, Mingsheng Li, Gang Yu, Hao Fei, Hongyuan Zhu, Jiayuan Fan, and Tao Chen. Ll3da: Visual interactive instruction tuning for omni-3d understanding reasoning and planning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 26428–26438, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Scanqa: 3d question answering for spatial scene understanding

    Daichi Azuma, Taiki Miyanishi, Shuhei Kurita, and Motoaki Kawanabe. Scanqa: 3d question answering for spatial scene understanding. Inproceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 19129–19139, 2022

    2022

  9. [9]

    Pointllm: Empowering large language models to understand point clouds

    Runsen Xu, Xiaolong Wang, Tai Wang, Yilun Chen, Jiangmiao Pang, and Dahua Lin. Pointllm: Empowering large language models to understand point clouds. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 131–147. Springer, 2024

    2024

  10. [10]

    Large-scale point cloud semantic segmentation with superpoint graphs

    Loic Landrieu and Martin Simonovsky. Large-scale point cloud semantic segmentation with superpoint graphs. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4558–4567, 2018

    2018

  11. [11]

    3d semantic segmentation with submanifold sparse convolutional networks

    Benjamin Graham, Martin Engelcke, and Laurens Van Der Maaten. 3d semantic segmentation with submanifold sparse convolutional networks. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9224–9232, 2018

    2018

  12. [12]

    Lisa: Reasoning segmentation via large language model

    Xin Lai, Zhuotao Tian, Yukang Chen, Yanwei Li, Yuhui Yuan, Shu Liu, and Jiaya Jia. Lisa: Reasoning segmentation via large language model. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9579–9589, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Pixellm: Pixel reasoning with large multimodal model

    Zhongwei Ren, Zhicheng Huang, Yunchao Wei, Yao Zhao, Dongmei Fu, Jiashi Feng, and Xiaojie Jin. Pixellm: Pixel reasoning with large multimodal model. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 26374–26383, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes

    Angela Dai, Angel X Chang, Manolis Savva, Maciej Halber, Thomas Funkhouser, and Matthias Nießner. Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5828–5839, 2017

    2017

  15. [15]

    Matterport3d: Learning from rgb-d data in indoor environments.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.06158, 2017

    Angel Chang, Angela Dai, Thomas Funkhouser, Maciej Halber, Matthias Niessner, Manolis Savva, Shuran Song, Andy Zeng, and Yinda Zhang. Matterport3d: Learning from rgb-d data in indoor environments.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.06158, 2017. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation

    Charles R Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 652–660, 2017

    2017

  17. [17]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  18. [18]

    Point transformer

    Hengshuang Zhao, Li Jiang, Jiaya Jia, Philip HS Torr, and Vladlen Koltun. Point transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 16259–16268, 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger

    Xiaoyang Wu, Li Jiang, Peng-Shuai Wang, Zhijian Liu, Xihui Liu, Yu Qiao, Wanli Ouyang, Tong He, and Hengshuang Zhao. Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4840–4851, 2024

    2024

  20. [20]

    Hexplane representation for 3d semantic scene understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05127, 2025

    Zeren Chen, Yuenan Hou, Yulin Chen, Li Liu, Xiao Sun, and Lu Sheng. Hexplane representation for 3d semantic scene understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05127, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Nerf-det++: Incorporating semantic cues and perspective-aware depth supervision for indoor multi-view 3d detection.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2025

    Chenxi Huang, Yuenan Hou, Weicai Ye, Di Huang, Xiaoshui Huang, Binbin Lin, and Deng Cai. Nerf-det++: Incorporating semantic cues and perspective-aware depth supervision for indoor multi-view 3d detection.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Taseg: Temporal aggregation network for lidar semantic segmentation

    Xiaopei Wu, Yuenan Hou, Xiaoshui Huang, Binbin Lin, Tong He, Xinge Zhu, Yuexin Ma, Boxi Wu, Haifeng Liu, Deng Cai, et al. Taseg: Temporal aggregation network for lidar semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15311–15320, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Point-to-voxel knowledge distillation for lidar semantic segmentation

    Yuenan Hou, Xinge Zhu, Yuexin Ma, Chen Change Loy, and Yikang Li. Point-to-voxel knowledge distillation for lidar semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8479–8488, 2022

    2022

  24. [24]

    Superpoint transformer for 3d scene instance segmentation

    Jiahao Sun, Chunmei Qing, Junpeng Tan, and Xiangmin Xu. Superpoint transformer for 3d scene instance segmentation. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 2393–2401, 2023

    2023

  25. [25]

    4d spatio-temporal convnets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks

    Christopher Choy, JunYoung Gwak, and Silvio Savarese. 4d spatio-temporal convnets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3075–3084, 2019

    2019

  26. [26]

    Mask3d: Mask transformer for 3d semantic instance segmentation

    Jonas Schult, Francis Engelmann, Alexander Hermans, Or Litany, Siyu Tang, and Bastian Leibe. Mask3d: Mask transformer for 3d semantic instance segmentation. In2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 8216–8223. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  27. [27]

    Oneformer3d: One transformer for unified point cloud segmentation

    Maxim Kolodiazhnyi, Anna V orontsova, Anton Konushin, and Danila Rukhovich. Oneformer3d: One transformer for unified point cloud segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20943–20953, 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    Openscene: 3d scene understanding with open vocabularies

    Songyou Peng, Kyle Genova, Chiyu Jiang, Andrea Tagliasacchi, Marc Pollefeys, Thomas Funkhouser, et al. Openscene: 3d scene understanding with open vocabularies. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 815–824, 2023

    2023

  29. [29]

    Openmask3d: Open-vocabulary 3d instance segmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13631, 2023

    Ayça Takmaz, Elisabetta Fedele, Robert W Sumner, Marc Pollefeys, Federico Tombari, and Francis Engelmann. Openmask3d: Open-vocabulary 3d instance segmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13631, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Moe3d: Mixture of experts meets multi-modal 3d understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22103, 2025

    Yu Li, Yuenan Hou, Yingmei Wei, Xinge Zhu, Yuexin Ma, Wenqi Shao, and Yanming Guo. Moe3d: Mixture of experts meets multi-modal 3d understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22103, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Towards label-free 3d visual grounding with vision foundation models

    Xiaopei Wu, Yuenan Hou, Binbin Lin, Xinge Zhu, Yuexin Ma, Haifeng Liu, Deng Cai, and Xiao Sun. Towards label-free 3d visual grounding with vision foundation models. InIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 612–617. IEEE, 2025. 11

    2025

  32. [32]

    Referit3d: Neural listeners for fine-grained 3d object identification in real-world scenes

    Panos Achlioptas, Ahmed Abdelreheem, Fei Xia, Mohamed Elhoseiny, and Leonidas Guibas. Referit3d: Neural listeners for fine-grained 3d object identification in real-world scenes. In European conference on computer vision, pages 422–440. Springer, 2020

    2020

  33. [33]

    Instancerefer: Cooperative holistic understanding for visual grounding on point clouds through instance multi-level contextual referring

    Zhihao Yuan, Xu Yan, Yinghong Liao, Ruimao Zhang, Sheng Wang, Zhen Li, and Shuguang Cui. Instancerefer: Cooperative holistic understanding for visual grounding on point clouds through instance multi-level contextual referring. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1791–1800, 2021

    2021

  34. [34]

    3dvg-transformer: Relation modeling for visual grounding on point clouds

    Lichen Zhao, Daigang Cai, Lu Sheng, and Dong Xu. 3dvg-transformer: Relation modeling for visual grounding on point clouds. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2928–2937, 2021

    2021

  35. [35]

    3d-sps: Single-stage 3d visual grounding via referred point progressive selection

    Junyu Luo, Jiahui Fu, Xianghao Kong, Chen Gao, Haibing Ren, Hao Shen, Huaxia Xia, and Si Liu. 3d-sps: Single-stage 3d visual grounding via referred point progressive selection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16454–16463, 2022

    2022

  36. [36]

    Visa: Reasoning video object segmentation via large language models

    Cilin Yan, Haochen Wang, Shilin Yan, Xiaolong Jiang, Yao Hu, Guoliang Kang, Weidi Xie, and Efstratios Gavves. Visa: Reasoning video object segmentation via large language models. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 98–115. Springer, 2024

    2024

  37. [37]

    Deris: Decoupling perception and cognition for enhanced referring image segmentation through loopback synergy

    Ming Dai, Wenxuan Cheng, Jiang-jiang Liu, Sen Yang, Wenxiao Cai, Yanpeng Sun, and Wankou Yang. Deris: Decoupling perception and cognition for enhanced referring image segmentation through loopback synergy. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19936–19946, 2025

    2025

  38. [38]

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 19730–19742. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  39. [39]

    Scaling instruction-finetuned language models.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(70):1–53, 2024

    Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Yunxuan Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, et al. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(70):1–53, 2024

    2024

  40. [40]

    Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023

    Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PmLR, 2021

    2021

  42. [42]

    Language-grounded indoor 3d semantic segmentation in the wild

    David Rozenberszki, Or Litany, and Angela Dai. Language-grounded indoor 3d semantic segmentation in the wild. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 125–141. Springer, 2022. 12 A Implementation Details This section provides additional implementation details that are omitted from the main paper. We mainly describe the candidate generation protocol...

    2022