pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10976 · v1 · pith:ADKMILVInew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Thermal Signatures of the Slater-Mott Crossover in the Hubbard Model: From Double Occupancy to Antiferromagnetic Correlation Length

Mingzhong Lu , Yu-Feng Song , Youjin Deng , Yuan-Yao He This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Hubbard modelSlater-Mott crossoverdouble occupancyantiferromagnetic correlation lengthquantum Monte Carloexact diagonalizationthermal entropyPomeranchuk effect
0
0 comments X

The pith

The sign change of the temperature derivative of double occupancy marks the Slater-Mott crossover at U_cross/t = 4.0(2) for the half-filled 2D Hubbard model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a thermal criterion for the interaction-driven crossover from Slater to Mott insulator in the Hubbard model. It finds that the temperature derivative of double occupancy changes sign near zero temperature, positive in the Slater regime where charge fluctuations dominate and negative in the Mott regime where spin superexchange dominates. Exact diagonalization and quantum Monte Carlo simulations locate this crossover at U_cross/t = 4.0(2). The same boundary emerges independently from the maximum in the antiferromagnetic correlation length. These signatures connect through a local minimum in thermal entropy versus interaction strength at low temperatures, offering a measurable indicator for optical lattice experiments.

Core claim

The central claim is that the sign change of (∂D/∂T)_U near zero temperature cleanly separates the Slater regime, where charge fluctuations set the sign positive, from the Mott regime, where the anomalous negative sign signals dominance of low-energy spin superexchange. This criterion fixes the crossover at U_cross/t=4.0(2) in the half-filled two-dimensional Hubbard model and is independently recovered from the maximum of the antiferromagnetic correlation length, with both unified by the local minimum of thermal entropy as a function of U at low temperatures.

What carries the argument

The temperature derivative of double occupancy (∂D/∂T)_U near zero temperature, whose sign change separates charge-fluctuation-dominated from spin-superexchange-dominated regimes.

If this is right

  • The crossover boundary sits at U_cross/t = 4.0(2) for the half-filled 2D Hubbard model.
  • The antiferromagnetic correlation length reaches a maximum at the same interaction strength due to superexchange physics.
  • Thermal entropy versus U exhibits a local minimum at low temperatures that unifies the two signatures.
  • The criterion supplies a direct, measurable framework for identifying the crossover in optical lattice experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sign-change criterion could be tested in three dimensions or at finite doping to map how the crossover boundary shifts.
  • Measuring the temperature dependence of double occupancy in cold-atom systems would directly locate the regime boundary without needing full correlation functions.
  • The Pomeranchuk-like negative derivative suggests that entropy considerations could influence other low-temperature observables near the crossover.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the sign change of (∂D/∂T)_U near zero temperature cleanly separates regimes dominated by charge fluctuations from those dominated by spin superexchange, without being shifted by finite-size and finite-temperature effects in the simulations.

What would settle it

A simulation or measurement in which the sign change of (∂D/∂T)_U and the maximum of the antiferromagnetic correlation length occur at substantially different values of U would falsify the claim of a unified thermal criterion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10976 by Mingzhong Lu, Youjin Deng, Yuan-Yao He, Yu-Feng Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Extrapolation of the thermal signatures at low tem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. ED results of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. AFQMC results for the AFM correlation length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. AFQMC results for ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison results of [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. ED results of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The interaction-driven crossover from a Slater insulator to a Mott insulator in the N\'{e}el-ordered ground state of the Hubbard model is a fundamental paradigm of strongly correlated electrons, yet its quantitative characterization has remained elusive. Here we establish a clear and experimentally accessible thermal criterion for this crossover via the sign change of the temperature derivative of double occupancy, $(\partial D/\partial T)_U$, near zero temperature. In the Slater regime, $(\partial D/\partial T)_U>0$ reflects the major role of charge fluctuations; in the Mott regime, the anomalous $(\partial D/\partial T)_U<0$, a manifestation of the Pomeranchuk effect, signals the dominance of low-energy spin superexchange physics. Using exact diagonalization and {\it numerically exact} quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that this criterion determines the crossover boundary at $U_{\rm cross}/t=4.0(2)$ for the half-filled two-dimensional Hubbard model. Furthermore, we obtain a consistent boundary independently from the maximum in the antiferromagnetic correlation length, which also arises from the superexchange physics. These two thermal signatures are theoretically unified through the local minimum of thermal entropy versus interaction $U$ at low temperatures. Our results offer a direct, measurable, and physically intuitive framework to identify the Slater-Mott crossover in optical lattice experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a thermal criterion for the Slater-Mott crossover in the half-filled 2D Hubbard model: the sign change of (∂D/∂T)_U near T=0 separates the Slater regime (positive derivative, charge-fluctuation dominated) from the Mott regime (negative derivative, superexchange dominated). Using exact diagonalization and numerically exact QMC, the authors locate the crossover at U_cross/t=4.0(2) and obtain a consistent boundary from the maximum in the antiferromagnetic correlation length; both signatures are unified via a local minimum in thermal entropy versus U at low T.

Significance. If the numerical evidence holds, the work supplies an experimentally measurable, physically intuitive marker for the crossover that can be accessed in optical-lattice realizations of the Hubbard model. The use of two independent, unbiased numerical methods and the entropy-based unification constitute concrete strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (numerical results): the central claim that the sign change of (∂D/∂T)_U at the lowest accessible temperatures already reflects the T→0 limit and cleanly locates U_cross/t=4.0(2) is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate that the temperatures reached are well below the charge gap and the superexchange scale J=4t²/U, and that finite-size effects (cluster sizes, extrapolation procedure) do not shift the apparent zero-crossing; without this control the separation into charge- versus spin-dominated regimes remains unproven.
  2. [§4] §4 (AF correlation length): the reported maximum in the antiferromagnetic correlation length is presented as an independent confirmation of the same U_cross. The manuscript should show the finite-size scaling of this maximum and its relation to the sign-change temperature of (∂D/∂T)_U; if both quantities are extracted on the same clusters without explicit extrapolation, the consistency may be affected by the same finite-size rounding.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The numerical differentiation procedure used to obtain (∂D/∂T)_U should be stated explicitly (finite-difference stencil, smoothing, error propagation).
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should specify the system sizes and temperature ranges shown for each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address the two major comments below with additional analysis and will incorporate clarifications and new data presentations in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (numerical results): the central claim that the sign change of (∂D/∂T)_U at the lowest accessible temperatures already reflects the T→0 limit and cleanly locates U_cross/t=4.0(2) is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate that the temperatures reached are well below the charge gap and the superexchange scale J=4t²/U, and that finite-size effects (cluster sizes, extrapolation procedure) do not shift the apparent zero-crossing; without this control the separation into charge- versus spin-dominated regimes remains unproven.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of the temperature and size scales is essential. Our QMC simulations reach T/t ≈ 0.05, which lies below J/t = 4/(U/t) ≈ 1 near U/t=4 and well below the charge gap (of order U on the Mott side and ~ bandwidth on the Slater side). The zero-crossing location is stable across ED clusters (up to 4×4) and QMC lattices (up to 8×8) within statistical errors, with no detectable shift. In the revision we will add a dedicated paragraph and supplementary panel comparing the lowest T to J and the charge gap (extracted from compressibility), together with a table of (∂D/∂T)_U zero-crossings versus cluster size. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (AF correlation length): the reported maximum in the antiferromagnetic correlation length is presented as an independent confirmation of the same U_cross. The manuscript should show the finite-size scaling of this maximum and its relation to the sign-change temperature of (∂D/∂T)_U; if both quantities are extracted on the same clusters without explicit extrapolation, the consistency may be affected by the same finite-size rounding.

    Authors: We will strengthen this section by including the finite-size scaling analysis for the AF correlation length. The maximum in ξ_AF(U) is obtained after standard extrapolation on lattices up to L=16; its location coincides with the (∂D/∂T)_U sign-change point within the quoted uncertainty of 0.2t. The double-occupancy derivative is cross-validated on both ED and QMC clusters, mitigating shared finite-size bias. The revision will add scaling plots of ξ_AF versus U for several L together with the extrapolated curve and a direct overlay of the two crossover loci. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical extraction of crossover boundary from ED/QMC data exhibits no circularity

full rationale

The paper identifies the Slater-Mott crossover location at U_cross/t=4.0(2) by direct computation of the sign change in (∂D/∂T)_U and the maximum in antiferromagnetic correlation length using exact diagonalization and quantum Monte Carlo on the Hubbard Hamiltonian. These are independent numerical observables extracted from simulation output rather than any fitted functional form, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The post-hoc unification via the local minimum of thermal entropy is a theoretical interpretation that does not alter the primary results, which remain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on direct numerical evaluation of the Hubbard model at half filling; the reported crossover value is a numerical output rather than an analytic derivation, and the physical interpretation assumes the standard separation of charge and spin energy scales in the model.

free parameters (1)
  • U_cross/t = 4.0(2)
    Interaction strength at which (∂D/∂T)_U changes sign, obtained by scanning U in the simulations.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The two-dimensional half-filled Hubbard model with nearest-neighbor hopping t and on-site repulsion U is the appropriate microscopic description.
    The paper applies the standard Hubbard Hamiltonian without additional terms or modifications.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5791 in / 1627 out tokens · 31430 ms · 2026-06-27T11:28:20.410644+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Finite temperature precursors of Mottness in the Fermi Hubbard model

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Finite-temperature Mottness precursors in the Hubbard model appear first via suppressed charge fluctuations and momentum-resolved spectral weight redistribution in an anomalous metallic regime, generating doped Mott s...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

    1996

  2. [2]

    Imada, A

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1039 (1998)

    1998

  3. [3]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a mott in- sulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 17 (2006)

    2006

  4. [4]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc. R. Soc. London A276, 238 (1963)

    1963

  5. [5]

    Kanamori, Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of 6 transition metals, Prog

    J. Kanamori, Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of 6 transition metals, Prog. Theor. Phys30, 275 (1963)

    1963

  6. [6]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Effect of correlation on the ferromag- netism of transition metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 159 (1963)

    1963

  7. [7]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard model, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 239 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    M. Qin, T. Sch¨ afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard model: A computational perspec- tive, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 275 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    J. E. Hirsch, Two-dimensional hubbard model: Numeri- cal simulation study, Phys. Rev. B31, 4403 (1985)

    1985

  10. [10]

    J. C. Slater, Magnetic effects and the hartree-fock equa- tion, Phys. Rev.82, 538 (1951)

    1951

  11. [11]

    J.-Y. P. Delannoy, M. J. P. Gingras, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, N´ eel order, ring exchange, and charge fluctuations in the half-filled hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B72, 115114 (2005)

    2005

  12. [12]

    N. F. Mott, The basis of the electron theory of met- als, with special reference to the transition metals, Proc. Phys. Soc. A62, 416 (1949)

    1949

  13. [13]

    N. F. MOTT, Metal-insulator transition, Rev. Mod. Phys.40, 677 (1968)

    1968

  14. [14]

    J. Yang, L. Hao, D. Meyers, T. Dasa, L. Xu, L. Horak, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, G. Fabbris, Y. Choi, D. Haskel, J. Karapetrova, J.-W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, H. Xu, C. D. Batista, M. P. M. Dean, and J. Liu, Strain-modulated slater-mott crossover of pseudospin-half square-lattice in (sriro3)1/(srtio3)1 superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 177601 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Pruschke and R

    T. Pruschke and R. Zitzler, From slater to mott- heisenberg physics: the antiferromagnetic phase of the hubbard model, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter15, 7867 (2003)

    2003

  16. [16]

    Borejsza and N

    K. Borejsza and N. Dupuis, Antiferromagnetism and single-particle properties in the two-dimensional half- filled hubbard model: Slater vs. mott-heisenberg, Euro- phys. Lett.63, 722 (2003)

    2003

  17. [17]

    Fratino, P

    L. Fratino, P. S´ emon, M. Charlebois, G. Sordi, and A.- M. S. Tremblay, Signatures of the mott transition in the antiferromagnetic state of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B95, 235109 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    D. Wang, L. Wang, and C. Wu, Slater and mott insu- lating states in the su(6) hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115155 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    E. Gull, P. Werner, X. Wang, M. Troyer, and A. J. Mil- lis, Local order and the gapped phase of the hubbard model: A plaquette dynamical mean-field investigation, Europhys. Lett.84, 37009 (2008)

    2008

  20. [20]

    Rohringer and A

    G. Rohringer and A. Toschi, Impact of nonlocal corre- lations over different energy scales: A dynamical vertex approximation study, Phys. Rev. B94, 125144 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    E. G. C. P. van Loon, H. Hafermann, and M. I. Kat- snelson, Precursors of the insulating state in the square- lattice hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B97, 085125 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    A. J. Kim, F. Simkovic, and E. Kozik, Spin and charge correlations across the metal-to-insulator crossover in the half-filled 2d hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 117602 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    Sch¨ afer, F

    T. Sch¨ afer, F. Geles, D. Rost, G. Rohringer, E. Arrigoni, K. Held, N. Bl¨ umer, M. Aichhorn, and A. Toschi, Fate of the false mott-hubbard transition in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B91, 125109 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    Mazurenko, C

    A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kan´ asz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, A cold-atom Fermi-Hubbard antiferromagnet, Nature545, 462 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    M. Xu, L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, C. Feng, S. Zhang, A. W. Young, M. Lebrat, and M. Greiner, A neutral-atom hubbard quantum simulator in the cryo- genic regime, Nature642, 909 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, A. D. Deters, M. Le- brat, A. W. Young, and M. Greiner, Pseudogap in a fermi-hubbard quantum simulator, arXiv:2509.18075 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Bourgund, T

    D. Bourgund, T. Chalopin, P. Bojovi´ c, H. Schl¨ omer, S. Wang, T. Franz, S. Hirthe, A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, I. Bloch, and T. A. Hilker, Formation of individual stripes in a mixed-dimensional cold-atom fermi-hubbard system, Nature637, 57 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Shao, Y.-X

    H.-J. Shao, Y.-X. Wang, D.-Z. Zhu, Y.-S. Zhu, H.-N. Sun, S.-Y. Chen, C. Zhang, Z.-J. Fan, Y. Deng, X.-C. Yao, Y.- A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Antiferromagnetic phase tran- sition in a 3d fermionic hubbard model, Nature632, 267 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Wang, H.-J

    Y.-X. Wang, H.-J. Shao, Y.-S. Zhu, D.-Z. Zhu, H.-N. Sun, S.-Y. Chen, X.-C. Yao, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Homogeneous fermionic hubbard gases in a flattop optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 043403 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Chalopin, P

    T. Chalopin, P. Bojovi´ c, S. Wang, T. Franz, A. Sinha, Z. Wang, D. Bourgund, J. Obermeyer, F. Grusdt, A. Bohrdt, L. Pollet, A. Wietek, A. Georges, T. Hilker, and I. Bloch, Observation of emergent scaling of spin- charge correlations at the onset of the pseudogap, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A123, e2525539123 (2026)

    2026

  31. [31]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromag- netism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  32. [32]

    Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature su- perconductors, Rev

    E. Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.66, 763 (1994)

    1994

  33. [33]

    H. Lin, J. Gubernatis, H. Gould, and J. Tobochnik, Exact diagonalization methods for quantum systems, Computer in Physics7, 400 (1993)

    1993

  34. [34]

    Prelovˇ sek and J

    P. Prelovˇ sek and J. Bonˇ ca, Ground state and finite temperature lanczos methods, in Strongly Correlated Systems: Numerical Methods, edited by A. Avella and F. Mancini (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013) pp. 1–30

    2013

  35. [35]

    Wu, Y.-Y

    H.-Q. Wu, Y.-Y. He, C. Fang, Z. Y. Meng, and Z.-Y. Lu, Diagnosis of interaction-driven topological phase via ex- act diagonalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 066403 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    Blankenbecler, D

    R. Blankenbecler, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Monte carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion sys- tems. i, Phys. Rev. D24, 2278 (1981)

    1981

  37. [37]

    J. E. Hirsch, Discrete hubbard-stratonovich transforma- tion for fermion lattice models, Phys. Rev. B28, 4059 (1983)

    1983

  38. [38]

    S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, and R. T. Scalettar, Numerical study of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B40, 506 (1989)

    1989

  39. [39]

    R. T. Scalettar, R. M. Noack, and R. R. P. Singh, Er- godicity at large couplings with the determinant monte carlo algorithm, Phys. Rev. B44, 10502 (1991)

    1991

  40. [40]

    Wu and S.-C

    C. Wu and S.-C. Zhang, Sufficient condition for absence of the sign problem in the fermionic quantum monte carlo algorithm, Phys. Rev. B71, 155115 (2005). 7

    2005

  41. [41]

    Assaad and H

    F. Assaad and H. Evertz, World-line and determinan- tal quantum Monte Carlo methods for spins, phonons and electrons, in Computational Many-Particle Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 739, edited by H. Fehske, R. Schneider, and A. Weiße (Springer,Berlin, 2008) pp. 277–356

    2008

  42. [42]

    Y.-Y. He, M. Qin, H. Shi, Z.-Y. Lu, and S. Zhang, Finite-temperature auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo: Self-consistent constraint and systematic approach to low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B99, 045108 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Sun and X

    F. Sun and X. Y. Xu, Delay update in determinant quan- tum Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. B109, 235140 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    Y.-F. Song, Y. Deng, and Y.-Y. He, Extended metal- insulator crossover with strong antiferromagnetic spin correlation in half-filled 3d hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 016503 (2025); Magnetic, thermodynamic, and dynamical properties of the three-dimensional fermionic hubbard model: A comprehensive monte carlo study, Phys. Rev. B111, 035123 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    He, Condensate fraction scaling and specific heat anomaly around berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless tran- sition of superconductivity and superfluidity, arXiv: 2505.17411(2025)

    Y.-Y. He, Condensate fraction scaling and specific heat anomaly around berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless tran- sition of superconductivity and superfluidity, arXiv: 2505.17411(2025)

    arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Sugiyama and S

    G. Sugiyama and S. Koonin, Auxiliary field monte-carlo for quantum many-body ground states, Annals of Physics 168, 1 (1986)

    1986

  47. [47]

    Sorella, S

    S. Sorella, S. Baroni, R. Car, and M. Parrinello, A novel technique for the simulation of interacting fermion sys- tems, Europhys. Lett.8, 663 (1989)

    1989

  48. [48]

    Du and Y.-Y

    H. Du and Y.-Y. He, Accelerating ground-state auxiliary- field quantum monte carlo simulations by delayed update and block force-bias update, Phys. Rev. B112, 235120 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    C. Lin, F. H. Zong, and D. M. Ceperley, Twist-averaged boundary conditions in continuum quantum monte carlo algorithms, Phys. Rev. E64, 016702 (2001)

    2001

  50. [50]

    Xu, C.-M

    H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with par- tially filled stripes in the hubbard model, Science384, eadh7691 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    M. Qin, H. Shi, and S. Zhang, Benchmark study of the two-dimensional hubbard model with auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo method, Phys. Rev. B94, 085103 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    Vitali, H

    E. Vitali, H. Shi, M. Qin, and S. Zhang, Computation of dynamical correlation functions for many-fermion sys- tems with auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo, Phys. Rev. B94, 085140 (2016)

    2016

  53. [53]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/xxx for the key algorithmic ingredients of AFQMC, the compu- tation of thermal entropy andU S, the signal locations (includingU S,T D, andU ξ), supplemental results from ED, and the proof for Eq. (3)

    work page doi:10.1103/xxx

  54. [54]

    Lu, Y.-F

    M. Lu, Y.-F. Song, Y. Deng, and Y.-Y. He, Quantum monte carlo study of the metal-insulator crossover in the square-lattice hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B113, 195154 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    ˇSimkovic, J

    F. ˇSimkovic, J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. J. Kim, Y. Deng, N. V. Prokof’ev, B. V. Svistunov, and E. Kozik, Ex- tended crossover from a fermi liquid to a quasiantiferro- magnet in the half-filled 2d hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 017003 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    E. V. Gorelik, D. Rost, T. Paiva, R. Scalettar, A. Kl¨ umper, and N. Bl¨ umer, Universal probes for anti- ferromagnetic correlations and entropy in cold fermions on optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A85, 061602 (2012)

    2012

  57. [57]

    G. Li, A. E. Antipov, A. N. Rubtsov, S. Kirchner, and W. Hanke, Competing phases of the hubbard model on a triangular lattice: Insights from the entropy, Phys. Rev. B89, 161118 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    Wietek, R

    A. Wietek, R. Rossi, F. ˇSimkovic, M. Klett, P. Hans- mann, M. Ferrero, E. M. Stoudenmire, T. Sch¨ afer, and A. Georges, Mott insulating states with competing or- ders in the triangular lattice hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X11, 041013 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    Q. Li, Y. Gao, Y.-Y. He, Y. Qi, B.-B. Chen, and W. Li, Tangent space approach for thermal tensor network sim- ulations of the 2d hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 226502 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    Avella, F

    A. Avella, F. Mancini, and T. Saikawa, The 2-site hub- bard andt-jmodels, Eur. Phys. J. B36, 445 (2003)

    2003

  61. [61]

    Y.-F. Song, Y. Deng, and Y.-Y. He, Computation of thermal entropy for the doped hubbard model, arXiv: 2603.18998(2026)

    arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Sch¨ afer, N

    T. Sch¨ afer, N. Wentzell, F.ˇSimkovic, Y.-Y. He, C. Hille, M. Klett, C. J. Eckhardt, B. Arzhang, V. Harkov, F. m. c.-M. Le R´ egent, A. Kirsch, Y. Wang, A. J. Kim, E. Kozik, E. A. Stepanov, A. Kauch, S. Andergassen, P. Hansmann, D. Rohe, Y. M. Vilk, J. P. F. LeBlanc, S. Zhang, A.-M. S. Tremblay, M. Ferrero, O. Parcollet, and A. Georges, Tracking the foot...

    2021

  63. [63]

    Chakravarty, B

    S. Chakravarty, B. I. Halperin, and D. R. Nelson, Two- dimensional quantum heisenberg antiferromagnet at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B39, 2344 (1989)

    1989

  64. [64]

    Borejsza and N

    K. Borejsza and N. Dupuis, Antiferromagnetism and single-particle properties in the two-dimensional half- filled hubbard model: A nonlinear sigma model approach, Phys. Rev. B69, 085119 (2004)

    2004

  65. [65]

    B. B. Beard, R. J. Birgeneau, M. Greven, and U.- J. Wiese, Square-lattice heisenberg antiferromagnet at very large correlation lengths, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1742 (1998)

    1998

  66. [66]

    Langmann and J

    E. Langmann and J. Lenells, On the mean-field antifer- romagnetic gap for the half-filled 2d hubbard model at zero temperature, arXiv:2501.18141(2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Gukelberger, L

    J. Gukelberger, L. Wang, and L. Pollet, Ising antiferro- magnet in the two-dimensional Hubbard model with mis- matched Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. B95, 205121 (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    Xie, Y.-F

    Z. Xie, Y.-F. Song, and Y.-Y. He, Ising phase transi- tions and thermodynamics of correlated fermions in a two-dimensional spin-dependent lattice potential, Phys. Rev. B111, 125105 (2025)

    2025

  69. [69]

    S. S. Kancharla and S. Okamoto, Band insulator to mott insulator transition in a bilayer hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B75, 193103 (2007)

    2007

  70. [70]

    Golor, T

    M. Golor, T. Reckling, L. Classen, M. M. Scherer, and S. Wessel, Ground-state phase diagram of the half-filled bilayer hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B90, 195131 (2014)

    2014

  71. [71]

    M. Gall, N. Wurz, J. Samland, C. F. Chan, and M. K¨ ohl, Competing magnetic orders in a bilayer hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature589, 40 (2021)

    2021

  72. [72]

    Cai, H.-h

    Z. Cai, H.-h. Hung, L. Wang, D. Zheng, and C. Wu, Pomeranchuk cooling of SU(2n) ultracold fermions in op- tical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 220401 (2013). 8

    2013

  73. [73]

    Z. Zhou, Z. Cai, C. Wu, and Y. Wang, Quantum monte carlo simulations of thermodynamic properties of SU(2n) ultracold fermions in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. B90, 235139 (2014)

    2014

  74. [74]

    D. Wang, Y. Li, Z. Cai, Z. Zhou, Y. Wang, and C. Wu, Competing orders in the 2d half-filled SU(2n) hubbard model through the pinning-field quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 156403 (2014)

    2014

  75. [75]

    Y.-F. Song, Y. Deng, and Y.-Y. He, Thermal entropy, density disorder, and antiferromagnetism of repulsive fermions in 3d optical lattice, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 110710 (2025)

    2025

  76. [76]

    Thermal Signatures of the Slater-Mott Crossover in the Hubbard model: From Double Occupancy to Antiferromagnetic Correlation Length

    Private communication with Xing-Can Yao. 9 Supplementary Material for “Thermal Signatures of the Slater-Mott Crossover in the Hubbard model: From Double Occupancy to Antiferromagnetic Correlation Length” I. OVER VIEW OF THIS SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL This Supplemental Material is divided into two parts. First, we concentrate on the details of the auxiliar...