pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11892 · v1 · pith:54QPDTQAnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🧮 math.AP

Mean-field imitation dynamics on fast assortative networks

Benedict Russell , Andrew Nugent , Jacques Bara This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords imitation dynamicsmean-field limitPrisoner's DilemmacooperationFokker-Planck equationstationary distributionsassortative networksstochastic updates
0
0 comments X

The pith

In the mean-field limit of imitation dynamics on fast assortative networks, stochastic updates produce unique linearly stable cooperative stationary distributions under sufficient noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the mean-field limit for a population playing a continuous-strategy Prisoner's Dilemma on a dynamically weighted network that evolves much faster than strategies. Without noise the solution converges to a single Dirac mass at one strategy value. When stochastic strategy updates are added, the limit becomes a non-local Fokker-Planck equation whose stationary distributions are shown to exist, to be unique, and to be linearly stable once noise exceeds a threshold. For initially separated clusters a payoff threshold is identified above which average cooperation rises. These results matter because they link fast network adaptation and random exploration to the emergence of stable population-level cooperation rather than pure consensus.

Core claim

Without noise the mean-field limit is well-posed and collapses to a single Dirac mass. For initially separated clusters a payoff threshold and sufficient conditions are given under which overall cooperation increases. With stochastic updates the limit is a non-local Fokker-Planck equation; existence and uniqueness of stationary distributions are proved, and linear stability holds under sufficient noise. Numerics show that noise converts the deterministic consensus into stable cooperative stationary behaviour.

What carries the argument

The non-local Fokker-Planck equation obtained after incorporating edge weights into the strategy evolution equation and passing to the mean-field limit.

If this is right

  • Without noise every solution converges to a single Dirac mass.
  • For initially separated clusters a payoff threshold controls whether mean cooperation rises.
  • Sufficient noise guarantees existence, uniqueness and linear stability of stationary distributions.
  • Numerical trajectories confirm that noise replaces deterministic consensus with stable cooperative states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The payoff threshold identified for separated clusters could be checked by running finite-population agent-based simulations with controlled initial separation.
  • The linear-stability result suggests that adding small random perturbations to strategy updates in real social networks might prevent collapse to uniform defection.
  • The same fast-network reduction might be applied to other continuous-strategy games to test whether noise-assisted stability is specific to the Prisoner's Dilemma payoff structure.

Load-bearing premise

The network evolves fast enough that its edge weights can be folded into the strategy update rule before the large-population limit is taken.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation of the finite-agent stochastic process on the network whose long-time distribution deviates from the stationary solution of the derived Fokker-Planck equation when noise is large.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11892 by Andrew Nugent, Benedict Russell, Jacques Bara.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A comparison of fast network assortative dynamics against a complete graph in a finite population. In both settings, the population reach a single strategy. The assortative mechanism induces a higher level of cooperation compared to a fixed, complete network. Parameters are b = 5, c = 1, β = 1, N = 11 and the weights are initially uniform. 2.2 Formal derivation of the mean-field limit In this section, we d… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Difference between mean cooperation for fast assortative dynamics and a complete static network. The difference is always non-negative, and the dynamics transition near the payoff b = 3c. Finite volumes method is used for T = 10, with the mean at the final time represented by colour. The payoff c = 1 is fixed whilst b varies; the initial strategy distribution is uniform. distribution being a sum of two Dir… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Heat map of the limit point L(β) as the weight (wy) of the cooperator cluster varies from 0 (all defectors) to 1 (all cooperators). The payoff c = 1 is fixed and the effect of changing b near the threshold is shown. The blue dashed line shows the weight threshold for monotonicity in β to hold. We have shown that there is a critical point in the payoff parametrisation: b ≥ 3c. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SDE simulation for fast assortative network (blue) and for complete network (orange). This illustrates the how strategy noise can induce higher level of cooperation when the network is assortative. Parameters are b = 4, c = 1, β = 5, N = 11, σ = 0.03. where W (i) t is a standard one-dimensional Wiener process, and reflecting boundary conditions are applied. When the policy updates follow an SDE, the popula… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical simulation using the Finite Volume Method of the PDE with an initial bimodal beta distribu￾tion. The evolution is separated into two-phases, with strategies combining into a single modal distribution before moving towards cooperation. Parameters are b = 3, c = 1, β = 1, σ2 = 0.01. 4.1 Numerical solution and properties We first present some numerical solutions of the PDE with diffusion. This enabl… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fixed point of the mapping F for different values of β near the threshold b = 3c. In the centre figure, the approximated peak of the distribution is plotted in red; the accuracy improves for larger values of β. In a complete network, the population clusters around defection. For the fast assortative network, when b = 2, increasing the selection pressure induces more defection; when b = 3 the network dynami… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The emergence of cooperation in structured populations is fundamental to the success of human societies. Physical and online networks can drive behavioural change by altering who people interact with, thereby modifying social pressures. In this paper, we study imitation dynamics in a population of self-interested agents playing a continuous strategy Prisoner's Dilemma on a dynamically evolving weighted network. In the fast-network regime, we incorporate the edge weights into the strategy evolution before deriving and analysing the large population mean-field limit. Without noise, we establish well-posedness and show the solution collapses to a single Dirac mass. For initially separated clusters, we identify a payoff threshold and sufficient conditions for the overall level of cooperation to increase. We then introduce stochastic strategy updates, and obtain a non-local Fokker-Planck equation in the mean-field limit. We rigorously prove existence and uniqueness of stationary distributions, and show linear stability under sufficient noise. Numerics illustrate that noise can transform the deterministic consensus into stable cooperative stationary behaviour. These findings show that the fast adaptive interactions and stochastic exploration can jointly support the emergence of stable cooperation at a population level.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies imitation dynamics for a continuous-strategy Prisoner's Dilemma on dynamically evolving weighted networks in the fast-network regime. Edge weights are incorporated into the strategy evolution equation prior to passing to the large-population mean-field limit. Without noise the resulting deterministic equation is shown to be well-posed with solutions collapsing to a single Dirac mass; for initially separated clusters a payoff threshold is identified above which overall cooperation increases. With stochastic strategy updates the mean-field limit yields a non-local Fokker-Planck equation; existence and uniqueness of stationary distributions are proved together with linear stability under sufficient noise. Numerical illustrations indicate that noise can convert deterministic consensus into stable cooperative stationary states.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a rigorous mean-field treatment of how fast adaptive assortative networks and stochastic exploration jointly support stable cooperation, extending evolutionary game theory on networks with explicit control on the ordering of limits and stability analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (fast-network regime) and the derivation leading to the mean-field equation: the abstract and introduction state that edge weights are incorporated into the strategy evolution before the N→∞ limit is taken, yet no error estimate, commutativity argument, or uniform-in-N control is supplied to justify that this ordering produces the correct non-local Fokker-Planck equation; all subsequent well-posedness, collapse, and stability claims rest on this step.
  2. [Theorem on well-posedness] Theorem on well-posedness and Dirac-mass collapse (deterministic case): the abstract asserts these properties, but the precise function space, growth conditions on the payoff kernel, and the form of the integro-differential equation (likely Eq. (12) or (15)) are not stated explicitly enough to verify that the proof controls the collapse without additional assumptions that may fail for separated clusters.
  3. [Stationary distributions section] Existence/uniqueness and linear-stability results for the stationary distributions of the non-local Fokker-Planck equation: these are load-bearing for the claim that sufficient noise yields stable cooperative states, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit spectral-gap estimate or Lyapunov functional whose derivative is controlled uniformly in the non-local interaction term.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the payoff function and imitation rate should be introduced once and used consistently; several symbols appear to be redefined between the deterministic and stochastic sections.
  2. The numerical section would benefit from a brief description of the discretization scheme and the number of Monte-Carlo realizations used to generate the reported trajectories.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive criticism. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (fast-network regime) and the derivation leading to the mean-field equation: the abstract and introduction state that edge weights are incorporated into the strategy evolution before the N→∞ limit is taken, yet no error estimate, commutativity argument, or uniform-in-N control is supplied to justify that this ordering produces the correct non-local Fokker-Planck equation; all subsequent well-posedness, collapse, and stability claims rest on this step.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification for the ordering of limits is desirable. The derivation in §2 first modifies the finite-N imitation dynamics to include the evolving edge weights and only then passes to the mean-field limit; this ordering is built into the model statement. However, the manuscript does not supply quantitative error bounds or a commutativity argument. In the revision we will add a dedicated remark (or short appendix) that (i) recalls the standard propagation-of-chaos framework used for fast adaptive networks, (ii) states the precise assumptions on the weight-update rule under which the limit equation is expected to hold, and (iii) cites comparable results in the literature. We do not claim that a full uniform-in-N control is already present, so this constitutes a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Theorem on well-posedness] Theorem on well-posedness and Dirac-mass collapse (deterministic case): the abstract asserts these properties, but the precise function space, growth conditions on the payoff kernel, and the form of the integro-differential equation (likely Eq. (12) or (15)) are not stated explicitly enough to verify that the proof controls the collapse without additional assumptions that may fail for separated clusters.

    Authors: The well-posedness result appears in Section 3 and concerns the continuity equation (12) on the space of probability measures with finite first moment; the payoff kernel is assumed continuous and bounded. The collapse statement for initially separated clusters is conditional on the payoff threshold identified in the text. We acknowledge that the theorem statement could be more self-contained. In the revision we will (i) restate the precise function space and kernel assumptions at the beginning of the theorem, (ii) clarify that the velocity field remains Lipschitz under the stated boundedness, and (iii) add a short paragraph explaining why the separated-cluster case does not require extra assumptions beyond those already listed. These changes will be made explicitly. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Stationary distributions section] Existence/uniqueness and linear-stability results for the stationary distributions of the non-local Fokker-Planck equation: these are load-bearing for the claim that sufficient noise yields stable cooperative states, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit spectral-gap estimate or Lyapunov functional whose derivative is controlled uniformly in the non-local interaction term.

    Authors: Existence and uniqueness of stationary measures are obtained via a fixed-point argument on the space of probability measures. Linear stability is shown by linearizing the non-local Fokker-Planck operator and verifying that the principal eigenvalue is negative once the diffusion coefficient exceeds a threshold depending on the interaction strength. The proof controls the nonlocal term by absorbing it into the diffusion; an explicit spectral-gap constant or a global Lyapunov functional is not constructed. We will add a clarifying remark that explains this absorption argument and, if space permits, include a brief numerical check of the decay rate. Should the referee require a quantitative gap estimate, we note that deriving one would necessitate stronger assumptions on the kernel and would constitute additional technical work beyond the present scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are self-contained mathematical limits and analysis

full rationale

The paper derives a mean-field limit from imitation dynamics under a fast-network regime assumption, then proves well-posedness, Dirac collapse without noise, existence/uniqueness of stationary distributions with noise, and linear stability. These are presented as rigorous analysis of the resulting non-local Fokker-Planck equation rather than reductions to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. No load-bearing steps equate outputs to inputs by construction, and the central claims rest on independent mathematical arguments. The fast-network regime is stated as the modeling choice under study, not smuggled via prior self-work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms; the work relies on standard existence theory for PDEs and mean-field limits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5712 in / 991 out tokens · 17136 ms · 2026-06-27T09:09:40.026177+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Convergence of Replicator Dynamics in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma with Restarts

    cs.GT 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the repeated Prisoner's Dilemma with trigger-restart, longer strategy lengths enable stability of cooperative strategies under replicator dynamics, with stable sequences requiring an initial 'hazing period' of defe...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Five rules for the evolution of cooperation

    Martin A. Nowak. “Five rules for the evolution of cooperation”. In:Science (New York, N.y.)314.5805 (Dec. 2006), pp. 1560–1563.issn: 0036-8075.doi:10.1126/science.1133755.url:https://pmc. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3279745/

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1133755.url:https://pmc 2006

  2. [2]

    Public Goods, Prisoners’ Dilemmas and the International Political Economy

    John A. C. Conybeare. “Public Goods, Prisoners’ Dilemmas and the International Political Economy”. In:International Studies Quarterly28.1 (Mar. 1984), pp. 5–22.issn: 0020-8833.doi:10.2307/2600395. url:https://doi.org/10.2307/2600395

    work page doi:10.2307/2600395 1984

  3. [3]

    Tax evasion and the prisoner’s dilemma

    Daniel Gottlieb. “Tax evasion and the prisoner’s dilemma”. In:Mathematical Social Sciences10.1 (Aug. 1985), pp. 81–89.issn: 0165-4896.doi:10 . 1016 / 0165 - 4896(85 ) 90039 - 3.url:https : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165489685900393

    arXiv 1985

  4. [4]

    How evolutionary game could solve the human vaccine dilemma

    K. M. Ariful Kabir. “How evolutionary game could solve the human vaccine dilemma”. In:Chaos, Solitons & Fractals152 (Nov. 2021), p. 111459.issn: 0960-0779.doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111459. url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077921008134

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111459 2021

  5. [5]

    Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans

    David G. Rand, Samuel Arbesman, and Nicholas A. Christakis. “Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans”. en. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108.48 (Nov. 2011), pp. 19193–19198.issn: 0027-8424, 1091-6490.doi:10.1073/pnas.1108243108. url:https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1108243108

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1108243108 2011

  6. [6]

    Cooperation Prevails When Individuals Adjust Their Social Ties

    Francisco C Santos, Jorge M Pacheco, and Tom Lenaerts. “Cooperation Prevails When Individuals Adjust Their Social Ties”. en. In:PLoS Computational Biology2.10 (Oct. 2006). Ed. by Luis Amaral, e140.issn: 1553-7358.doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020140.url:https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/ journal.pcbi.0020140

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020140.url:https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/ 2006

  7. [7]

    Enabling imitation-based cooperation in dy- namic social networks

    Jacques Bara, Paolo Turrini, and Giulia Andrighetto. “Enabling imitation-based cooperation in dy- namic social networks”. en. In:Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems36.2 (May 2022), p. 34. issn: 1573-7454.doi:10.1007/s10458- 022- 09562- w.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458- 022-09562-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s10458- 2022

  8. [8]

    Evolution of cooperation on large networks with community structure

    Babak Fotouhi et al. “Evolution of cooperation on large networks with community structure”. In: Journal of The Royal Society Interface16.152 (Mar. 2019), p. 20180677.issn: 1742-5689.doi:10. 1098/rsif.2018.0677.url:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0677

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2018.0677 2019

  9. [9]

    A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks

    Hisashi Ohtsuki et al. “A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks”. en. In:Nature441.7092 (May 2006), pp. 502–505.issn: 1476-4687.doi:10.1038/nature04605.url: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04605

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04605.url: 2006

  10. [10]

    Scale-Free Networks Provide a Unifying Framework for the Emergence of Cooperation

    F. C. Santos and J. M. Pacheco. “Scale-Free Networks Provide a Unifying Framework for the Emergence of Cooperation”. en. In:Physical Review Letters95.9 (Aug. 2005), p. 098104.issn: 0031-9007, 1079- 7114.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 95 . 098104.url:https : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett.95.098104

    2005

  11. [11]

    Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation

    David Melamed, Brent Simpson, and Ashley Harrell. “Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation”. en. In:Scientific Reports7.1 (Mar. 2017), p. 357.issn: 2045-2322.doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x.url:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-00265-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x.url:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-00265-x 2017

  12. [12]

    Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation

    Katrin Fehl, Daniel J. van der Post, and Dirk Semmann. “Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation”. eng. In:Ecology Letters14.6 (June 2011), pp. 546–551.issn: 1461-0248.doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01615.x. Page 18

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01615.x 2011

  13. [13]

    Opting out against defection leads to stable coexistence with cooperation

    Bo-Yu Zhang et al. “Opting out against defection leads to stable coexistence with cooperation”. In: Scientific Reports6 (Oct. 2016), p. 35902.issn: 2045-2322.doi:10.1038/srep35902.url:https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075917/

    work page doi:10.1038/srep35902.url:https: 2016

  14. [14]

    Anastassacos, S

    N. Anastassacos, S. Hailes, and M. Musolesi.Partner Selection for the Emergence of Cooperation in Multi-Agent Systems Using Reinforcement Learning. eng. Proceedings paper. Conference Name: Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20) Meeting Name: Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20) Place: New York City...

    2020

  15. [15]

    Luis R Izquierdo, Segismundo S Izquierdo, and Robert Boyd.Successful strategies in the voluntarily repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma. en. 2026.doi:10.64898/2026.01.16.699891

    work page doi:10.64898/2026.01.16.699891 2026

  16. [16]

    Learning Partner Selection Rules that Sustain Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with the Option of Opting Out

    Chin-wing Leung. “Learning Partner Selection Rules that Sustain Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with the Option of Opting Out”. en. In:New Zealand(2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Co-learning of strategy and structure achieves full cooperation in complex networks with dynamical linking

    Xiaoqing Fan, Chin-wing Leung, and Paolo Turrini. “Co-learning of strategy and structure achieves full cooperation in complex networks with dynamical linking”. In:34th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. In Press. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, Aug. 2025, pp. 72–80.doi:10.24963/ijcai.2025/9....

    work page doi:10.24963/ijcai.2025/9.url:https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai 2025

  18. [18]

    Defection at first sight : learning partner selection in optional social dilemmas without prior information

    Benedict Russell, Chin-wing Leung, and Paolo Turrini. “Defection at first sight : learning partner selection in optional social dilemmas without prior information”. In:25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. In Press. IFAAMAS; ACM Digital library, May 2026. doi:10.65109/IBSZ1473.url:https://doi.org/10.65109/IBSZ1473

    work page doi:10.65109/ibsz1473.url:https://doi.org/10.65109/ibsz1473 2026

  19. [19]

    Repeated games with partner choice

    Christopher Graser et al. “Repeated games with partner choice”. en. In:PLOS Computational Biology 21.2 (Feb. 2025), e1012810.issn: 1553-7358.doi:10 . 1371 / journal . pcbi . 1012810.url:https : //journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012810

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012810 2025

  20. [20]

    Active linking in evolutionary games

    Jorge M. Pacheco, Arne Traulsen, and Martin A. Nowak. “Active linking in evolutionary games”. In: Journal of Theoretical Biology243.3 (Dec. 2006), pp. 437–443.issn: 0022-5193.doi:10.1016/j.jtbi. 2006.06.027.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519306002736

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi 2006

  21. [21]

    Coevolution of Cooperation, Response to Adverse Social Ties and Network Structure

    Sven Van Segbroeck et al. “Coevolution of Cooperation, Response to Adverse Social Ties and Network Structure”. en. In:Games1.3 (Sept. 2010), pp. 317–337.issn: 2073-4336.doi:10.3390/g1030317. url:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/1/3/317

    work page doi:10.3390/g1030317 2010

  22. [22]

    A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game

    Xiu-Deng Zheng et al. “A simple rule of direct reciprocity leads to the stable coexistence of cooperation and defection in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game”. en. In:Journal of Theoretical Biology420 (May 2017), pp. 12–17.issn: 00225193.doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.036.url:https://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022519317300991

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.036.url:https://linkinghub 2017

  23. [23]

    Benedict Russell, Chin-wing Leung, and Paolo Turrini.The Dynamics of Policy Gradient in Social Dilemmas with Partner Selection. 2026. arXiv:2605.18185.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605. 18185

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Leave and let leave: A sufficient condition to explain the evolutionary emergence of cooperation

    Luis R. Izquierdo, Segismundo S. Izquierdo, and Fernando Vega-Redondo. “Leave and let leave: A sufficient condition to explain the evolutionary emergence of cooperation”. In:Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control46 (Sept. 2014), pp. 91–113.issn: 0165-1889.doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2014.06. 007.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188914001456

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2014.06 2014

  25. [25]

    On evolving network models and their influence on opinion formation

    Andrew Nugent, Susana N. Gomes, and Marie-Therese Wolfram. “On evolving network models and their influence on opinion formation”. In:Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena456 (Dec. 2023), p. 133914. issn: 0167-2789.doi:10.1016/j.physd.2023.133914.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0167278923002683

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physd.2023.133914.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ 2023

  26. [26]

    Gomes.Emergent structures in coupled opinion and network dynamics

    Andrew Nugent, Carmen Calatayud Fernandez, and Susana N. Gomes.Emergent structures in coupled opinion and network dynamics. 2026. arXiv:2602.03738.url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03738

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Continuum limits for adaptive network dynamics

    Marios Antonios Gkogkas, Christian Kuehn, and Chuang Xu. “Continuum limits for adaptive network dynamics”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.05898(2021)

    arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Mean-field and graph limits for collective dynamics models with time-varying weights

    Nathalie Ayi and Nastassia Pouradier Duteil. “Mean-field and graph limits for collective dynamics models with time-varying weights”. In:Journal of Differential Equations299 (2021), pp. 65–110

    2021

  29. [29]

    Bridging the gap between agent based models and continuous opinion dynamics

    Andrew Nugent, Susana N Gomes, and Marie-Therese Wolfram. “Bridging the gap between agent based models and continuous opinion dynamics”. In:Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 651 (2024), p. 129886

    2024

  30. [30]

    Network adaption based on environment feedback promotes cooperation in co- evolutionary games

    Yujie Guo et al. “Network adaption based on environment feedback promotes cooperation in co- evolutionary games”. In:Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications617 (May 2023), p. 128689. issn: 0378-4371.doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.128689.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0378437123002443

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.128689.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ 2023

  31. [31]

    Propagation of chaos: A review of models, methods and applications. I. Models and methods

    Louis-Pierre Chaintron and Antoine Diez. “Propagation of chaos: A review of models, methods and applications. I. Models and methods”. In:Kinetic and Related Models15.6 (2022), pp. 895–1015. Page 19 issn: 1937-5093.doi:10.3934/krm.2022017.url:https://www.aimsciences.org/article/id/ 631fd3b64cedfd0007ce7600

    work page doi:10.3934/krm.2022017.url:https://www.aimsciences.org/article/id/ 2022

  32. [32]

    Flocking dynamics and mean-field limit in the Cucker–Smale-type model with topo- logical interactions

    Jan Haskovec. “Flocking dynamics and mean-field limit in the Cucker–Smale-type model with topo- logical interactions”. In:Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena261 (2013), pp. 42–51.issn: 0167-2789. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2013.06.006.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0167278913001796

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physd.2013.06.006.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ 2013

  33. [33]

    Modelling the Dynamics of Multiagent Q-Learning in Repeated Symmetric Games: a Mean Field Theoretic Approach

    Shuyue Hu, Chin-wing Leung, and Ho-fung Leung. “Modelling the Dynamics of Multiagent Q-Learning in Repeated Symmetric Games: a Mean Field Theoretic Approach”. In:Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Ed. by H. Wallach et al. Vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.url:https:// proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/40afd3a37cca05ef...

    2019

  34. [34]

    Modelling the Dynamics of Multi-Agent Q- learning: The Stochastic Effects of Local Interaction and Incomplete Information

    Chin-wing Leung, Shuyue Hu, and Ho-fung Leung. “Modelling the Dynamics of Multi-Agent Q- learning: The Stochastic Effects of Local Interaction and Incomplete Information”. en. In:Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vienna, Austria: Interna- tional Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organizat...

    work page doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/55.url:https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2022/55 2022

  35. [35]

    Opinion dynamics with continuous age structure

    Andrew Nugent, Susana N Gomes, and Marie-Therese Wolfram. “Opinion dynamics with continuous age structure”. In:European Journal of Applied Mathematics(2025), pp. 1–36

    2025

  36. [36]

    InProceedings of the 15th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages

    Rene Carmona and Fran¸ cois Delarue.Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications I : Mean Field FBSDEs, Control, and Games. Springer, Jan. 2018.doi:doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 58920-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 2018

  37. [37]

    Linking Individual and Collective Behavior in Adaptive Social Networks

    Fl´ avio L. Pinheiro, Francisco C. Santos, and Jorge M. Pacheco. “Linking Individual and Collective Behavior in Adaptive Social Networks”. en. In:Physical Review Letters116.12 (Mar. 2016), p. 128702. issn: 0031-9007, 1079-7114.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.128702.url:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.128702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.128702.url:https://link.aps.org/ 2016

  38. [38]

    Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus

    Sebastien Motsch and Eitan Tadmor. “Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus”. In:SIAM review 56.4 (2014), pp. 577–621

    2014

  39. [39]

    Emergence of polarization in a sigmoidal bounded-confidence model of opinion dynamics

    Heather Z Brooks, Philip S Chodrow, and Mason A Porter. “Emergence of polarization in a sigmoidal bounded-confidence model of opinion dynamics”. In:SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 23.2 (2024), pp. 1442–1470

    2024

  40. [40]

    Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups

    Iain D Couzin et al. “Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups”. In:Journal of theoretical biology218.1 (2002), pp. 1–11

    2002

  41. [41]

    Evolution of cooperation on temporal networks

    Aming Li et al. “Evolution of cooperation on temporal networks”. en. In:Nature Communications 11.1 (May 2020), p. 2259.issn: 2041-1723.doi:10 . 1038 / s41467 - 020 - 16088 - w.url:https : //www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-16088-w

    2020

  42. [42]

    Pavliotis and Andrew M

    Grigorios A. Pavliotis and Andrew M. Stuart.Multiscale Methods: Averaging and Homogenization. Springer, 2008.isbn: 978-0-387-73829-1.doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73829-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73829-1 2008

  43. [43]

    Mean Field Limit for Stochastic Particle Systems

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin and Zhenfu Wang. “Mean Field Limit for Stochastic Particle Systems”. en. In:Active Particles, Volume 1. Series Title: Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 379–402.isbn: 978-3-319-49994-9 978- 3-319-49996-3.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49996-3_10.url:http://link.sp...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49996-3_10.url:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ 2017

  44. [44]

    The Pontryagin Maximum Principle in the Wasserstein Space

    Benoˆ ıt Bonnet and Francesco Rossi. “The Pontryagin Maximum Principle in the Wasserstein Space”. In:Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations58 (2017), pp. 1–36.url:https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:23997334

    2017

  45. [45]

    Asymptotic behaviour of some interacting particle systems; McKean-Vlasov and Boltzmann models

    Sylvie M´ el´ eard. “Asymptotic behaviour of some interacting particle systems; McKean-Vlasov and Boltzmann models”. en. In:Probabilistic Models for Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations: Lectures given at the 1st Session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (C.I.M.E.) held in Montecatini Terme, Italy, May 22–30, 1995. Ed. by Carl Graham et a...

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0093177.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0093177 1995

  46. [47]

    J. L. Lions and E. Magenes.Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications. Vol. 1. Springer, 1972

    1972

  47. [48]

    Static network structure can stabilize human cooperation

    David G. Rand et al. “Static network structure can stabilize human cooperation”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111.48 (Dec. 2014), pp. 17093–17098.doi:10.1073/pnas.1400406111. url:https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1400406111. Page 20

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1400406111 2014

  48. [49]

    A Piecewise Rotation of the Circle, IPR Maps and Their Connection with Translation Surfaces

    C´ edric Villani. “The Wasserstein distances”. In:Optimal Transport: Old and New. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 93–111.isbn: 978-3-540-71050-9.doi:10.1007/978- 3- 540- 71050-9_6.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9_6

    work page doi:10.1007/978- 2009

  49. [50]

    Walter Rudin.Principles of Mathematical Analysis. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1976.isbn: 978-0070856134

    1976

  50. [51]

    1 ki NX j=1 aijpx(xi, xj)(xj −x i) # = 1 N NX i=1 φ′(xi)

    Lawrence C Evans.Partial differential equations. Vol. 19. American Mathematical Society, 2022. Page 21 A Additional derivations The full mean-field derivation reads Z Ω ∂tµ(t, x)φ(x)dx = d dt Z Ω 1 N NX i=1 δxi(x)φ(x)dx = d dt 1 N NX i=1 φ(xi) = 1 N NX i=1 φ′(xi) dxi dt = 1 N NX i=1 φ′(xi) " 1 ki NX j=1 aijpx(xi, xj)(xj −x i) # = 1 N NX i=1 φ′(xi) " 1P k=...

    2022

  51. [52]

    This condition is (b−c)m µ(t)−c(y+z)≥0 (b−c)w z −c z+ (b−c)w y −c y≥0 α1z+α 2y≥0 whereα 1 := (b−c)w z −candα 2 := (b−c)w y −c. The define the region X={(z, y) : 0≤z≤y≤1, α 1z+α 2y≥0} Then the time derivative of the boundary line is dS dt =α 1 dz dt +α 2 dy dt = (y2 −z 2) α1wypµ(z, y) z+m µ − α2wz(1−p µ(z, y)) y+m µ Now substitutep µ(z, y) = 1 2 andα 2 =−α...