pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.14509 · v1 · pith:ABDYFNOJnew · submitted 2026-06-12 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Spinning test particles in the spacetime of a global monopole

Morteza Mohseni , Saurya Das This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 04:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords global monopolespinning test particleMathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equationsintegrable motionnon-geodesic trajectorytopological defectgeneral relativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spinning test particles in global monopole spacetime have trajectories, momenta and spin expressible by three angular functions, making the system integrable.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper solves the motion of spinning test particles in global monopole spacetime using the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations. Symmetries of the metric allow reduction of the problem so that trajectories, momenta and spin depend on three functions of polar and azimuthal angles. This proves the system is completely integrable. The authors find the general non-geodesic trajectory and study radial and planar cases, showing differences from non-spinning particles. A reader cares because this gives an exact solvable example of spin-influenced motion near a topological defect.

Core claim

By exploiting the symmetries of the global monopole spacetime, the equations of motion for spinning test particles are solved exactly. The trajectories, momenta, and spin are expressed in terms of three specific functions of the polar and azimuthal angles. The system is shown to be completely integrable, with the general non-geodesic trajectory derived along with radial and planar motions, which differ from geodesic paths of non-spinning particles.

What carries the argument

Symmetry reduction of the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations in the global monopole metric to three functions of the polar and azimuthal angles.

If this is right

  • The general non-geodesic trajectory of the spinning particle can be obtained explicitly.
  • Particular cases of radial motion and planar motion admit specific solutions.
  • The trajectories of spinning particles differ from those of non-spinning particles in this spacetime.
  • The integrability allows complete determination of momenta and spin evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This integrability may extend to spinning particles in other defect spacetimes with similar symmetries.
  • The three functions could be used to model spin precession effects in cosmological contexts involving monopoles.
  • Analytic expressions enable direct comparison with numerical simulations of test particle motion.

Load-bearing premise

The Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations govern the motion of spinning test particles in the global monopole metric and the metric symmetries permit reduction to three angular functions.

What would settle it

A numerical solution of the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations in global monopole spacetime that cannot be fit by any choice of three functions of the angles would falsify the exact solution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.14509 by Morteza Mohseni, Saurya Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the motion of spinning test particles in the spacetime of a global monopole in the framework of the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations. By making use of the symmetries of the spacetime, we obtain a general exact solution to the equations of motion. We show that the particle's trajectories, momenta, and spin can be expressed in terms of three specific functions of the polar and azimuthal angles. We also show that the system is completely integrable. We obtain the general non-geodesic trajectory of the particle, and also examine the particular cases of radial and planar motion. We compare the non-geodesic trajectories of a spinning particle with a non-spinning particle.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the motion of spinning test particles in the spacetime of a global monopole within the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon framework. Exploiting the spacetime symmetries, the authors derive a general exact solution to the equations of motion in which the trajectories, momenta, and spin are expressed in terms of three specific functions of the polar and azimuthal angles. They establish that the system is completely integrable, obtain the general non-geodesic trajectory, and analyze the special cases of radial and planar motion while comparing the results to the non-spinning (geodesic) case.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, the work supplies an explicit, symmetry-based exact solution for spinning test particles in a spacetime with a solid-angle deficit. The reduction to three angular functions and the proof of complete integrability constitute a concrete, reproducible result that extends the catalog of integrable MPD systems beyond standard black-hole backgrounds. This is a strength for analytic studies of spin-curvature coupling in topologically nontrivial geometries.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, the clear summary of our results, and the recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation relies on applying the standard Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations to the global monopole metric and reducing via its four Killing vectors plus spin supplementary condition, yielding an exact solution parametrized by three functions of the angular coordinates together with a proof of complete integrability. No parameters are fitted to data, no result is defined in terms of itself, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or ansatz imported from the authors' prior work. The claimed general non-geodesic trajectories and special cases (radial, planar) are direct consequences of the symmetry reduction, which is externally verifiable against the MPD framework and Killing-vector techniques in GR.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract alone; ledger entries are therefore minimal and provisional.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations correctly describe the motion of spinning test particles in curved spacetime.
    Standard assumption invoked by the choice of framework in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5635 in / 1155 out tokens · 30362 ms · 2026-06-27T04:42:53.455591+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    its topology, unspecified

    INTRODUCTION The field equations of the general theory of relativ- ity determine the local geometry of spacetime, but they leave its global shape, i.e. its topology, unspecified. On the other hand, the topology of spacetime could lead to important observational effects. An example of such ef- fects is the speculated imprints of cosmic topology in the cosm...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    THE GLOBAL MONOPOLE SP ACETIME The spacetime of a global monopole is described by the following line element ds2 = −dt2 + 1 α2 dr2 + r2(dθ2 + sin2 θdϕ2) (2.1) in which α < 1 is a constant so that a sphere of radius l would have an area 4π(αl)2 < 4πl2. This was first derived in [4] as a solution to the field equation associated with the Einstein-Hilbert ac...

  3. [3]

    The particle’s trajectory is given by xµ(τ )

    THE MPD EQUA TIONS The motion of a spinning test particle in a curved back- ground in the pole-dipole approximation is given by [ 18] Dpµ Dτ = − 1 2 Rµ νκλ ˙xν sκλ, (3.1) Dsµν Dτ = pµ ˙xν − pν ˙xµ, (3.2) in which pµ is the particle’s four-momentum, ˙xµ is the four-velocity, sµν is the spin tensor, D Dτ is the absolute derivative, and Rµναβ = ∂αΓµ νβ + Γ µ...

  4. [4]

    GENERAL ANAL YSIS For a spinning particle moving in a global monopole spacetime, the equation of motion ( 3.1) takes the follow- ing explicit form dp0 dτ = 0 , (4.1) dp1 dτ = α2 r ( ˙θ p2 + sin2θ ˙ϕ p3), (4.2) dp2 dτ = − ˙θp1 + ˙rp2 r + sinθ cosθ ˙ϕ p3 − (1 − α2) sin2θ ˙ϕ s23, (4.3) dp3 dτ = − ˙ϕp1 + ˙rp3 r − cotθ ˙θ p3 − cot θ ˙ϕ p2 + (1 − α2) ˙θ s23, (4...

  5. [5]

    GENERAL MOTION In this section, we turn to finding the general solution to the equations of motion of the spinning particle in the spacetime of a global monopole. From Eq. ( 4.1) we obtain p0 = E (5.1) in which E is a constant. Also, by combining Eqs. ( 4.2) and ( 3.9), we obtain p1 = α2 r (E t − m τ) + r0β r (5.2) in which r0 is the initial value of r an...

  6. [6]

    is not seen here due to the existence of the above- mentioned constants of motion. In Sec. 7, we briefly go through a few specific cases, and then we will address the general case in Sec. 8

  7. [7]

    ( 5.59) we can derive the following constant of motion rs01 + (λ2 − α2(1 − α2)) E r4 sin2 θ(s23)2 = J, (6.1) 7 where J = (λ2−α2(1−α2))q2 E

    COMPLETE INTEGRABILITY From Eq. ( 5.59) we can derive the following constant of motion rs01 + (λ2 − α2(1 − α2)) E r4 sin2 θ(s23)2 = J, (6.1) 7 where J = (λ2−α2(1−α2))q2 E . The Hamiltonian for the spinning particle with the Tul- czyjew supplementary condition and the parametrization described by Eq. ( 3.9) is H = 1 2m ( gµν + 4Rµαβγ sανsβγ Rαβγδ sαβsγδ − ...

  8. [8]

    4, there are situations where the spin-curvature coupling vanishes resulting in pµ and ˙xµ being parallel, and the particle moves along a geodesic

    GEODESIC MOTION As we discussed earlier in Sec. 4, there are situations where the spin-curvature coupling vanishes resulting in pµ and ˙xµ being parallel, and the particle moves along a geodesic. Before embarking on a little more detailed study of a few instances of such situations in this sec- tion, a closer look into the nature of the general solution p...

  9. [9]

    NON-GEODESIC MOTION Now, we return to the general situation described in Sec. 5. We first need to determine parameters of the problem. The parameter α is specified by the geometry of spacetime. The particle has two characteristic param- eters m (mass) and s (spin), and starts at a specific point described by three parameters r0, θ0, ϕ0. Then, we have a se...

  10. [10]

    Now, we can insert the above data into Eqs

    , (8.3) in which γ ≡ 1 − α2. Now, we can insert the above data into Eqs. ( 5.57) and ( 5.58) which can then be integrated to give r(τ ), θ(τ ), ϕ(τ ). Due to the symmetries of the spacetime we can set ϕ0 = 0 . We also set m = 1 . The trajectory of the particle is shown in Fig. 1 for θ0 = π 2 , E = 1 .01, q1 = q2 = q3 = 0 .1, α = 0 .95, r0 = 2 . Then, Eq. ...

  11. [11]

    By us- ing the symmetries of the spacetime, we found an ex- act solution to the MPD equations

    DISCUSSION We studied the motion of spinning test particles in the background spacetime of a global monopole. By us- ing the symmetries of the spacetime, we found an ex- act solution to the MPD equations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first general exact solution to the equations of motion of a spinning test particle moving in a curved spaceti...

    2019

  12. [12]

    N. J. Cornish, D. N. Spergel, and G. D. Starkman, Clas- sical Quant. Grav. 15, 2657 (1998)

    1998

  13. [13]

    Lachièze-Rey and J.-P

    M. Lachièze-Rey and J.-P. Luminet, Physics Reports 254, 135 (1995)

    1995

  14. [14]

    R. H. Brandenberger, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 09, 2117 (1994)

    1994

  15. [15]

    Barriola and A

    M. Barriola and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 341 (1989)

    1989

  16. [16]

    E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Braz. J. Phys. 31, 211 (2001)

    2001

  17. [17]

    D. D. Sokolov and A. A. Starobinskii, Soviet Physics Doklady 22, 312 (1977)

    1977

  18. [18]

    Chakraborty, Gen

    S. Chakraborty, Gen. Relat. Gravit. 28, 1115 (1996)

    1996

  19. [19]

    Banerjee and T

    A. Banerjee and T. Ghosh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 869 (2000)

    2000

  20. [20]

    Huang, J

    Q. Huang, J. Chen, and Y. Wang, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54, 459 (2015) , arXiv:1408.6901 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Rahaman, R

    F. Rahaman, R. Amin, M. Hasan, A. Islam, S. Ray, A. Aziz, and N. A. Pundeer, Fortschr. Physik 73, 2400007 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    H. Tan, J. Yang, J. Zhang, and T. He, Chinese Phys. B 27, 030401 (2018)

    2018

  23. [23]

    Graph neural network-based cell switching for energy optimization in ultra-dense heterogeneous networks,

    F. Ahmed, Scientific Reports 12, 10.1038/s41598-022- 12745-w (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022- 2022

  24. [24]

    Marunović and T

    A. Marunović and T. Prokopec, Phys. Lett. B 756, 268 (2016)

    2016

  25. [25]

    zhou Li, P

    X. zhou Li, P. Xi, and X. hua Zhai, Phys. Lett. B 666, 125 (2008)

    2008

  26. [26]

    Spinelly, U

    J. Spinelly, U. de Freitas, and E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024018 (2002) , arXiv:hep-th/0205046 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  27. [27]

    A. A. Shaikh, F. Ahmed, and B. Ranjan Datta, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2301.04897 (2023) , arXiv:2301.04897 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    L. G. Barbosa, L. C. N. Santos, J. V. Zamperlini, and F. M. da Silva, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 469 (2025) , arXiv:2504.07075 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Papapetrou, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don Series A 209, 248 (1951)

    A. Papapetrou, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don Series A 209, 248 (1951)

    1951

  30. [30]

    W. G. Dixon, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 314, 499 (1970)

    1970

  31. [31]

    Mohseni and H

    M. Mohseni and H. R. Sepangi, Classical Quant. Grav. 17, 4615 (2000) , arXiv:gr-qc/0009070 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  32. [32]

    Mohseni, R

    M. Mohseni, R. W. Tucker, and C. Wang, Classical Quant. Grav. 18, 3007 (2001) , arXiv:gr-qc/0308042 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    J. A. Nieto, J. Saucedo, and V. M. Villanueva, Phys. Lett. A 312, 175 (2003) , arXiv:hep-th/0303123 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  34. [34]

    Kyrian and O

    K. Kyrian and O. Semerák, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 382, 1922 (2007)

    1922

  35. [35]

    Messios, Int

    N. Messios, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 46, 562 (2007)

    2007

  36. [36]

    Singh, Phys

    D. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 78, 104028 (2008) , arXiv:0808.3005 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    Bini and A

    D. Bini and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D 84, 104012 (2011) , arXiv:1408.4952 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    Y. N. Obukhov and D. Puetzfeld, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044024 (2011) , arXiv:1010.1451 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Plyatsko and M

    R. Plyatsko and M. Fenyk, Phys. Rev. D 87, 044019 (2013), arXiv:1303.4707 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Mohseni, Gen

    M. Mohseni, Gen. Relat. Gravit. 47, 24 (2015) , arXiv:1502.07833 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    W. G. Ramírez and A. A. Deriglazov, Phys. Rev. D 92, 124017 (2015) , arXiv:1509.04926 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    M. E. Kahil, Astrophys. Space. Sc. L. 24, 84 (2018) , arXiv:1701.04136 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Marsot, Phys

    L. Marsot, Phys. Rev. D 100, 064050 (2019) , arXiv:1904.09260 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Antoniou, D

    I. Antoniou, D. Papadopoulos, and L. Perivolaropou- los, Classical Quant. Grav. 36, 085002 (2019) , arXiv:1903.03835 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Zhang, G

    Z. Zhang, G. Fan, and J. Jia, J. Cosmol. Astropart. P. 2022, 061 (2022) , arXiv:2207.09194 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Y. Song, Y. Cen, L. Tang, J. Hu, K. Diao, X. Zhao, and S. Shi, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 833 (2023) , arXiv:2208.03665 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    X. Pang, Q. Jiang, Y. Xiang, and G.-M. Deng, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 193 (2025) , arXiv:2410.04323 [gr-qc] . 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Mukherjee, G

    S. Mukherjee, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and R. K. Nayak, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 54, 113 (2022) , arXiv:1907.05659 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    L. F. O. Costa, J. Natário, and M. Zilhão, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104006 (2016) , arXiv:1207.0470 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    K. P. Tod, F. de Felice, and M. Calvani, Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 11 34, 365 (1976)

    1976

  51. [51]

    Rudiger, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 375, 185 (1981)

    R. Rudiger, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 375, 185 (1981)

    1981

  52. [52]

    Rudiger, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 385, 229 (1983)

    R. Rudiger, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 385, 229 (1983)

    1983

  53. [53]

    Compère and A

    G. Compère and A. Druart, SciPost Physics 12, 012 (2022), arXiv:2105.12454 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Ramond, Class

    P. Ramond, Class. Quantum Grav. 42, 065019 (2025) , arXiv:2402.02670 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Andersson, F

    L. Andersson, F. Gray, and M. A. Oancea, Phys. Rev. D 113, 064061 (2026) , arXiv:2512.07677 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Ö. Açık, Ü. Ertem, M. Önder, and A. Verçin, J. Math. Phys. 51, 022502 (2010) , arXiv:0803.3328 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  57. [57]

    Howarth and C

    L. Howarth and C. D. Collinson, Gen. Relat. Gravit. 32, 1845 (2000)

    2000

  58. [58]

    Lukes-Gerakopoulos, J

    G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, J. Seyrich, and D. Kunst, Phys. Rev. D 90, 104019 (2014) , arXiv:1409.4314 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    L. F. O. Costa and J. Natário, in Equations of Motion in Relativistic Gravity , edited by D. Puetzfeld, C. Läm- merzahl, and B. Schutz (Springer International Publish- ing Switzerland, Cham, 2015) pp. 215–258

    2015

  60. [60]

    C. A. Benavides-Gallego, J. M. Ladino, and E. Larrañaga, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064050 (2023) , arXiv:2306.17394 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Shahzadi, G

    M. Shahzadi, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and M. Kološ, Phys. Rev. D 112, 064013 (2025) , arXiv:2505.16783 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Suzuki and K.-I

    S. Suzuki and K.-I. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4848 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9604020 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  63. [63]

    Witzany, J

    V. Witzany, J. Steinhoff, and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 075003 (2019) , arXiv:1808.06582 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Witzany, Phys

    V. Witzany, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104030 (2019) , arXiv:1903.03651 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    V. P. Frolov, P. Krtouš, and D. Kubizňák, Living Rev. Relativ. 20, 6 (2017) , arXiv:1705.05482 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017