pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25021 · v1 · pith:PK6EYKXTnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 🌀 gr-qc

Modeling Direct Waves in Binary Black Hole Ringdowns

Richard Dyer , Adrian Ka-Wai Chung , Christopher J. Moore This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords black hole ringdowndirect wavesquasinormal modesnumerical relativityevent horizongravitational waveswaveform modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Direct waves in binary black hole ringdowns can be extracted with adapted quasinormal mode techniques, but their frequencies deviate from the horizon value.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests a proposed model in which direct waves, the prompt signals from plunging objects during ringdown, have properties tied to the event horizon. Researchers adapt analysis methods originally developed for quasinormal modes to pull these signals out of numerical relativity waveforms. The approach successfully identifies the direct wave component across a range of starting times. The extracted frequencies, however, do not match the values expected from the horizon, which undercuts the idea of using them as a new observational probe.

Core claim

Direct waves are identified in numerical-relativity waveforms over a range of ringdown start times by adapting quasinormal mode techniques, which demonstrates the utility of the horizon mode model, yet the direct wave frequency deviates from the horizon value and therefore limits its utility as a probe of the event horizon.

What carries the argument

The horizon mode model, which treats direct wave properties as directly related to event horizon geometry and allows simplified extraction from waveforms.

If this is right

  • Direct waves can be isolated from ringdown signals using fitting methods adapted from quasinormal mode studies.
  • The horizon mode model successfully identifies direct wave components over varying ringdown start times.
  • Frequency mismatch means direct waves cannot serve as reliable probes of horizon geometry.
  • Ringdown modeling must include both quasinormal modes and separate direct wave contributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Persistent frequency deviations may indicate additional effects during propagation from the horizon to distant observers.
  • Future gravitational wave observations could require separate templates for direct waves to avoid parameter biases.
  • Applying the same extraction to spinning or unequal-mass mergers might reveal whether the deviation depends on binary parameters.

Load-bearing premise

Techniques developed for quasinormal modes can be applied to isolate direct waves without introducing systematic biases that affect frequency comparisons.

What would settle it

A high-resolution numerical relativity simulation in which the extracted direct wave frequency either matches the horizon value across multiple start times or shows a clear, reproducible mismatch.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25021 by Adrian Ka-Wai Chung, Christopher J. Moore, Richard Dyer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison of the dimensionless frequencies and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The ringdown mode content as a function of ringdown start time. The analysis included QNMs with ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The results of the free frequency fits. Violin plots in the left panels show the posteriors on the real and imaginary parts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Rational filter results. The original waveform (gray) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Direct waves, prompt signals propagating from a plunging object to the observer, exist alongside quasinormal modes in binary black hole ringdown. It has been suggested that the properties of the direct wave are related to the event horizon; this simplifies modeling the direct wave and suggests the possibility of using it as a new observational probe of the horizon geometry. This paradigm is tested by extracting direct waves from numerical-relativity waveforms, adapting techniques originally developed for studying quasinormal modes. The direct wave is identified over a range of ringdown start times, demonstrating the utility of the horizon mode model. However, the direct wave frequency is found to deviate from the horizon value, limiting its utility as a probe of the event horizon.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript tests the horizon-mode model for direct waves in binary black hole ringdowns by extracting these prompt signals from numerical-relativity waveforms. Techniques originally developed for quasinormal modes are adapted to identify the direct wave over a range of ringdown start times. The extraction succeeds, but the measured frequency deviates from the horizon-mode prediction, leading to the conclusion that direct waves have limited utility as probes of the event horizon.

Significance. If the extraction procedure is free of systematic bias, the result would provide a concrete counter-example to the horizon-mode paradigm for direct waves and would constrain ringdown modeling. The variation over start times and use of NR data constitute a direct test of the model. The negative finding on frequency match is the key deliverable, but its robustness rests on the isolation method.

major comments (1)
  1. [extraction-method paragraph] Extraction-method paragraph: the central claim that the extracted frequency deviates from the horizon value rests on the adapted QNM fit cleanly isolating the direct-wave component. Direct waves are prompt, non-ringing signals whose time dependence differs from the exponentially damped sinusoids assumed in standard QNM fits. No cross-validation against an independent isolation technique (e.g., time-domain subtraction or alternate basis) is reported; without it the reported deviation could be an artifact of projection of other waveform content onto the fitted parameters. This is load-bearing for the negative result on horizon-mode utility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the extraction method below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Extraction-method paragraph: the central claim that the extracted frequency deviates from the horizon value rests on the adapted QNM fit cleanly isolating the direct-wave component. Direct waves are prompt, non-ringing signals whose time dependence differs from the exponentially damped sinusoids assumed in standard QNM fits. No cross-validation against an independent isolation technique (e.g., time-domain subtraction or alternate basis) is reported; without it the reported deviation could be an artifact of projection of other waveform content onto the fitted parameters. This is load-bearing for the negative result on horizon-mode utility.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this potential vulnerability in our isolation procedure. The direct wave is indeed a prompt signal whose time dependence differs from the damped-sinusoid form assumed by standard QNM fits. Our adaptation applies the fitting procedure over a range of early ringdown start times at which the direct wave is expected to be the dominant contribution. The fact that a stable frequency is recovered across this range of start times provides supporting evidence that the extracted component is not merely an artifact of projecting unrelated waveform content onto the fit parameters. Nevertheless, we agree that the absence of an independent cross-validation (such as time-domain subtraction or an alternate basis) leaves the result open to the concern raised. We will revise the manuscript to include an expanded discussion of the method's assumptions, its domain of applicability, and this specific limitation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; comparison to external prediction

full rationale

The paper extracts direct-wave components from NR waveforms by adapting existing QNM techniques, then compares the resulting frequency against an independent horizon-mode prediction. This is a direct comparison rather than a fit of the model to the same data or a self-definition. No quoted equations or steps reduce the reported deviation to the extraction inputs by construction. The central negative result (deviation from horizon value) retains independent content against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that direct waves can be cleanly separated from quasinormal modes using adapted extraction techniques and that the horizon-mode frequency is a well-defined external benchmark. No free parameters or invented entities are described in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Techniques developed for quasinormal modes can be adapted to isolate direct waves without introducing uncontrolled systematics.
    Stated in the abstract as the basis for the extraction procedure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5644 in / 1297 out tokens · 9544 ms · 2026-06-25T22:02:32.695234+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 17 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    How accurately, and for what range of start times, can the DW be modeled by a damped sinusoid with frequency given by the horizon quantities in Eq. 1?

  2. [2]

    To what extent does the horizon-mode picture de- rived from BH perturbation theory remain valid for the comparable-mass mergers? These questions are answered using techniques orig- inally developed for studies of QNMs in numerical- relativity (NR) waveforms. Models incorporating both QNM and DW contributions are fit to multiple spher- ical harmonics of st...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    LIGO Scientific and Virgo collaborations, PRD100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    LIGO Scientific and Virgo collaborations, PRD103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO and KAGRA collaborations, PRD112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO and KAGRA collaborations, (2026), arXiv:2603.19021 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Isiet al., PRL123, 111102 (2019), arXiv:1905.00869 [gr-qc]

    M. Isiet al., PRL123, 111102 (2019), arXiv:1905.00869 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    C. D. Capanoet al., PRL131, 221402 (2023), arXiv:2105.05238 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Isiet al., PRL127, 011103 (2021), arXiv:2012.04486 [gr-qc]

    M. Isiet al., PRL127, 011103 (2021), arXiv:2012.04486 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo and KAGRA collaborations, PRL 135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Mino and J

    Y. Mino and J. Brink, PRD78, 124015 (2008), arXiv:0809.2814 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  12. [12]

    Zimmerman and Y

    A. Zimmerman and Y. Chen, PRD84, 084012 (2011), arXiv:1106.0782 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  13. [13]

    Berti and V

    E. Berti and V. Cardoso, PRD74, 104020 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0605118

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    Della Roccaet al., (2025), arXiv:2512.07959 [gr-qc]

    M. Della Roccaet al., (2025), arXiv:2512.07959 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Motohashi and Y

    H. Motohashi and Y. Suichi, (2026), arXiv:2605.01964 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Oshitaet al., (2025), arXiv:2509.09165 [gr-qc]

    N. Oshitaet al., (2025), arXiv:2509.09165 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Luet al., (2025), arXiv:2510.01001 [gr-qc]

    N. Luet al., (2025), arXiv:2510.01001 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Ma, (2026), arXiv:2604.08680 [gr-qc]

    S. Ma, (2026), arXiv:2604.08680 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Kankani and S

    A. Kankani and S. T. McWilliams, (2026), arXiv:2603.15474 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    A. K.-W. Chunget al., (2026), arXiv:2606.06592 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    The LIGO Scientific, Virgo and Kagra Collaborations, (2026), arXiv:2605.27223 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    org/waveforms/extcce_catalog.html[Accessed: 2024]

    The SXS project, (2024),https://data.black-holes. org/waveforms/extcce_catalog.html[Accessed: 2024]

    2024

  23. [23]

    Dyer and C

    R. Dyer and C. J. Moore, PRL136, 191403 (2026), arXiv:2510.13954 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Dyer and C

    R. Dyer and C. J. Moore, PRD113, 104031 (2026), arXiv:2510.11783 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Luet al., PRD112, 064047 (2025), arXiv:2505.18560 [gr-qc]

    N. Luet al., PRD112, 064047 (2025), arXiv:2505.18560 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Maet al., PRD106, 084036 (2022), arXiv:2207.10870 [gr-qc]

    S. Maet al., PRD106, 084036 (2022), arXiv:2207.10870 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Finch,Black-hole Ringdown, Thesis, PhD (2023), https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/13992/

    E. Finch,Black-hole Ringdown, Thesis, PhD (2023), https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/13992/

    2023

  28. [28]

    Dyer and C

    R. Dyer and C. J. Moore, PRD111, 024002 (2025), arXiv:2410.13935 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Giesleret al., PRD111, 084041 (2025), arXiv:2411.11269 [gr-qc]

    M. Giesleret al., PRD111, 084041 (2025), arXiv:2411.11269 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Dyer and C

    R. Dyer and C. J. Moore,Applications of Bayesian infer- ence to QNM fits in numerical relativity(in prep) (2026)

    2026

  31. [31]

    Pacilioet al., PRD110, 103037 (2024), arXiv:2408.05276 [gr-qc]

    C. Pacilioet al., PRD110, 103037 (2024), arXiv:2408.05276 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Mitmanet al., PRD112, 064016 (2025), arXiv:2503.09678 [gr-qc]

    K. Mitmanet al., PRD112, 064016 (2025), arXiv:2503.09678 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Dyer and C

    R. Dyer and C. J. Moore, (2024),https://github.com/ BGP-QNM-FITS/bgp_qnm_fits[Accessed: June 2026]

    2024

  34. [34]

    Dyer and C

    R. Dyer and C. J. Moore, (2026),https://github.com/ Richardvnd/direct_waves[Accessed: June 2026]. 1 Supplemental Material MODE AMPLITUDES The Bayesian fits used to determine the ringdown mode content in the main Letter also produce posteri- ors on all of the mode amplitudes. For all times when a particular mode is identified the posterior on its mode ampl...

    2026