Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Modeling conversations as ordered speaker-window traces, conditioned on relationship, detects emotional entrainment at 93.47% accuracy.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 10:33 UTC pith:6K6E6AEB

load-bearing objection Solid dataset-and-detector package for role/context-conditioned entrainment; high numbers are real on the constructed task, but the TTS-disruption proxy is still the soft center. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2606.30543 v2 pith:6K6E6AEB submitted 2026-06-29 cs.CL cs.AI

TRACE: Temporal Relationship-Aware Conversational Entrainment Detection in Dyadic Speech

Sathvik Manikantan Napa Ugandhar , Hao Zhang , Alison Gunzler , Yuzhe Wang , Thomas Thebaud , Georgi Tinchev , Venkatesh Ravichandran , Laureano Moro-Vel\'azquez This is my paper
classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords emotional entrainmentdyadic speechconversational contextrelationship conditioningwindow-level acoustic embeddingsWhisper emotion representationsTRACEDyadEE
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Emotional entrainment—the mutual adaptation of affect between two speakers—is not a single global similarity score; it is shaped by who the speakers are to each other and by the situation they are in. This paper builds DyadEE, a dyadic speech dataset that pairs natural conversations with carefully disrupted counterparts made by inverting one speaker’s emotion via resynthesis while keeping the words, and it uses voice conversion so models cannot cheat by hearing synthesis artifacts. It then introduces TRACE, which treats each conversation as an ordered alternation of short acoustic windows rather than a bag of utterances, and feeds those windows plus relationship and context embeddings into a lightweight sequence model. The central finding is that this temporal, relationship-aware framing detects entrainment far better than pooled baselines, and that relationship and context each help—but through different model architectures. A sympathetic reader cares because speech agents that ignore role and situation will produce affectively wrong responses even when they sound pleasant.

Core claim

On DyadEE, treating a dyad as an ordered alternating sequence of emotion-finetuned Whisper window embeddings and conditioning on relationship type (TRACE-CE, speech+relationship) reaches 93.47% accuracy, 0.999 ROC-AUC, and 0.934 macro F1 for binary entrainment detection—substantially above speech-only TRACE and above matched Emotion MLP and DyadFormer baselines. Context and relationship supply complementary gains that are architecture-dependent: late fusion benefits most from context, cross-attention most from relationship.

What carries the argument

TRACE: each dyad is an interleaved window trace A1→B1→A2→B2… of acoustic embeddings from an emotion-finetuned Whisper encoder, processed by bidirectional LLaMA-style blocks and fused with sentence-BERT relationship/context vectors either by late fusion (TRACE-LF) or by cross-attention from an auxiliary token (TRACE-CE).

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on treating one-sided emotion-contradicting text-to-speech resynthesis as a faithful stand-in for real non-entrained conversation, so that high detection scores diagnose true affective coordination rather than mainly spotting synthetic mismatch.

What would settle it

Train TRACE on DyadEE, then test it on held-out natural conversations that humans rate as emotionally mismatched or disengaged without any resynthesis; if accuracy collapses toward chance while still succeeding on synthetic NE dyads, the operational proxy (and thus the central diagnostic claim) fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Speech agents can be scored and trained for role- and context-appropriate affective coordination, not just generic pleasantness.
  • Relationship type is a stronger conditioning signal than context for cross-attention architectures; the reverse holds for late fusion—so system design must match conditioning pathway to signal.
  • Voice-conversion augmentation on the entrained side is necessary to force models off synthesis-artifact shortcuts.
  • Binary detection on controlled disruptions can serve as a diagnostic benchmark for which social signals drive affective coordination before graded continuous labels exist.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If TRACE-style scores correlate with human ratings in live agent dialogue, they could become a training reward for adaptive companion and clinical voice agents.
  • The architecture split (context→late fusion, relationship→cross-attention) suggests social-role labels act more like discrete tokens while situational prompts act more like global priors—testable by swapping embedding granularities.
  • Naturalistic non-entrainment (silence, topic avoidance, affect regulation rather than inversion) may require a second negative class; success only on inverted-emotion NE would limit deployment claims.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces DyadEE, a dyadic speech dataset for binary emotional entrainment detection built from Seamless Interaction natural conversations (EE) and controlled non-entrained counterparts (NE) created by one-sided emotion-contradicting TTS resynthesis, with voice-conversion variants on both label sides to reduce authenticity shortcuts. It further proposes TRACE, which models each dyad as an ordered alternating sequence of window-level emotion-finetuned Whisper embeddings and conditions on SBERT-encoded relationship and context via late fusion (TRACE-LF) or cross-attention (TRACE-CE). On a speaker-pair-disjoint split, TRACE-CE with speech+relationship reaches 93.47% accuracy / 0.999 ROC-AUC / 0.934 F1, outperforming matched-feature Emotion MLP and DyadFormer baselines; ablations show architecture-dependent gains from relationship vs. context. A small human listening study supports a perceptible EE/NE gap.

Significance. If the constructed NE labels are accepted as a useful diagnostic proxy, the work is a solid contribution to computational paralinguistics and speech-agent evaluation: it releases a sizable, metadata-rich dyadic resource (DyadEE), a careful leakage protocol (speaker-pair-disjoint split, chance-level metadata-only classifiers, VC on both sides of the label), and a clear empirical result that temporal alternating-window modeling plus social-role conditioning substantially improves binary entrainment detection. The architecture-sensitive complementarity of relationship vs. context (Tables III–V) is scientifically interesting for multimodal conditioning design. Strengths include explicit framing of detection as a diagnostic rather than a continuous entrainment measure, human validation of label perceptibility, and planned code/dataset release. The main scientific value is conditional on how far the synthetic disruption generalizes beyond detecting the authors’ intervention.

major comments (3)
  1. [Introduction / §II.B / Table II] Introduction and §II.B: The central scientific claim (high detection accuracy diagnoses relational/contextual drivers of affective coordination) rests on treating one-sided emotion-contradicting EmotiVoice resynthesis as a valid NE proxy. Human evaluation (Table II) shows a clear EE/NE gap but also that 36% of low-NE judgments cite unnatural delivery and that NE+VC scores higher than NE alone (3.03 vs 2.21), consistent with residual artifact signal. Limitations already flags limited synthetic diversity, but the main results (Table III, 0.999 ROC-AUC) still read as if the proxy is settled. Please add a load-bearing analysis that bounds artifact vs. coordination cues (e.g., NE-only acoustic-artifact classifiers, error analysis by resynthesis emotion pair, or a held-out natural mismatch subset if available), and restate claims as diagnostic of the constructed disruption unless that analysis
  2. [Table III / §IV.C–D] Table III and §IV.C–D: The introduction claims relationship and context provide “complementary” gains, yet for TRACE-CE the best result is Sp+Rel (93.47%) while Sp+Ctx and Sp+Ctx+Rel both drop to ~84%, and joint conditioning degrades several relationship categories (e.g., Family −9.57 pp). TRACE-LF shows the inverse pattern. This is an interesting architecture result, but “complementary” is not supported for either model under joint conditioning. Please revise the claim language to match the evidence (architecture-gated single-signal benefits; competition under joint fusion) and discuss why cross-attention fails to combine the two auxiliaries.
  3. [Abstract / Table III] Abstract vs. Table III: The abstract (and the arXiv abstract variant) reports TRACE best accuracy as 97.01% in one version and 93.47% in the manuscript body; Table III’s best reported figure is 93.47% (TRACE-CE Sp+Rel). The abstract also mentions disruption via “partner swapping,” which is not the construction used in §II.B (emotion resynthesis + VC). Align the abstract, contribution list, and results to the actual methods and Table III numbers so the headline claim is reproducible from the paper alone.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§III.A / §IV] Window duration t (seconds) is introduced symbolically in §III.A but never given a numeric value in the experimental section; please state t, hop, and resulting average sequence length so the temporal grid is reproducible.
  2. [Table IV] Table IV marks Siblings and Parent–Child with n=12 and “unreliable”; consider moving those rows to an appendix or suppressing percentage-point claims for those categories in the main text.
  3. [Figure 1 / §II.B] Figure 1 caption and §II.B: clarify that MossFormer2 is applied to all originals before VC/resynthesis, and that “partner swapping” is not a separate NE construction (to avoid abstract/body mismatch).
  4. [§IV.A] §IV.A leakage note: one speaker identity appears across splits in 12 rows; a short quantitative check that removing those rows does not change Table III would strengthen the speaker-disjoint claim.
  5. [Tables I–III] Typos/consistency: “V oice” spacing artifacts in tables; “EmotiV oice” / “SeedVC” naming; abstract “97.01%” vs body “93.47%”; ensure all metric decimals use the same precision.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

NE class labels are defined by the authors' own emotion-contradicting resynthesis intervention, so binary detection accuracy partially reduces to recovering that construction (mitigated but not eliminated by VC and human ratings).

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Introduction (operationalization paragraph) + §II.B (NE: Emotion Resynthesis) + Table III (TRACE-CE Sp+Rel result)]
    "we instead operationalize entrainment detection through controlled disruption: non-entrained dyads are constructed by specifically severing inter-speaker affective coordination via emotion-contradicting resynthesis (which inverts one speaker’s affective trajectory while preserving lexical content)... TRACE-CE ... 93.47%"

    The binary NE label is defined exactly by the presence of the authors' one-sided emotion-inverting TTS intervention. The supervised detection task (and the reported 93.47% accuracy / 0.999 AUC that constitutes the strongest claim) therefore reduces, by construction, to recovering whether that intervention was applied. Architecture and conditioning ablations remain informative about which signals help recover the construction, but the absolute performance number is not an independent measurement of natural entrainment.

full rationale

This is an empirical ML paper with no first-principles derivation, uniqueness theorem, or fitted-parameter-as-prediction chain; TRACE's temporal architecture, Whisper embeddings, and late-fusion/cross-attention conditioning are independent modeling choices evaluated on held-out speaker-disjoint splits. The sole circularity is operational: the load-bearing evaluation target (EE vs NE) for the strongest claim (93.47% TRACE-CE Sp+Rel) is generated by the authors' controlled disruption (one-sided EmotiVoice inversion of dominant emotion). High accuracy therefore partly measures recovery of the inserted intervention rather than an externally observed entrainment phenomenon. The paper itself flags this (detection is a diagnostic, not a direct measure; Limitations notes synthetic NE may not generalize), and mitigations (VC on both label sides, chance-level metadata-only baselines, human Likert gap) supply independent content, keeping the score at partial rather than total circularity. No self-citation load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz smuggling is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central empirical claim rests on domain assumptions about what counts as entrainment disruption, on pretrained external models used as frozen or fixed feature extractors, and on standard ML training choices. There are no free physical constants; free parameters are modeling/training hyperparameters and construction choices that define the supervised target. Invented theoretical entities in the graviton sense are absent; DyadEE/TRACE are artifacts, not postulated natural kinds.

free parameters (6)
  • N_max windows per speaker = 256
    Truncation length fixed at 256 windows; conversations longer than N_max×t seconds are cut, which can discard late interaction dynamics that entrainment definitions often emphasize.
  • window duration t (seconds)
    Fixed-length windowing defines the temporal grid for Whisper embeddings; exact t is not numerically stated in the methods text provided, yet all sequence modeling depends on it.
  • AdamW learning rate and schedule = 1e-4, 25 epochs
    lr=1e-4, 2-epoch linear warmup, cosine decay over 25 epochs; performance numbers depend on this optimization recipe.
  • training noise and token masking = σ=0.15, mask=30%
    Gaussian noise σ=0.15 and 30% token masking on speech embeddings are training-only regularizers that can materially affect reported accuracy.
  • projected context/relationship embedding dim = 128
    SBERT 384-d embeddings projected to 128-d each; fusion capacity and TRACE-LF/CE behavior depend on this hand-chosen size.
  • TRACE depth and attention design = 6 blocks; CE: 2× cross-attn, 8 heads
    Six LLaMA-style bidirectional blocks; TRACE-CE uses two cross-attention layers with 8 heads—architectural free choices that gate which auxiliary signal helps.
axioms (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Emotional entrainment can be operationalized as a binary label by preserving natural dyads as EE and creating NE via one-sided emotion-contradicting resynthesis of lexical content.
    Stated in Introduction and §II.B as the measurement strategy because dense continuous affect annotation is too costly; load-bearing for all accuracy claims.
  • domain assumption Voice conversion preserves prosody/emotion trajectory while TTS resynthesis breaks entrainment, so VC-augmented EE examples force models to use coordination rather than synthesis artifacts.
    §II.B EE: Voice Conversion; underpins the claim that high accuracy is not an artifact detector.
  • domain assumption Emotion-finetuned Whisper-large-v3 final-layer embeddings carry affect-relevant acoustic cues sufficient for window-level entrainment modeling.
    §III.A Acoustic Emotion Embeddings; all models share this feature source.
  • domain assumption Sentence-BERT embeddings of prompt text and relationship category strings are adequate fixed dyad-level encodings of context and social role.
    §III.A Context and Relationship Features; used in all conditioned runs.
  • domain assumption Seamless Interaction natural dyads are emotionally entrained enough to serve as positive examples under the paper’s relationship and context taxonomy.
    §II.A selection from Seamless Interaction; positives inherit corpus assumptions rather than independent continuous entrainment annotation.
  • standard math Standard supervised classification metrics on a speaker-pair-disjoint split estimate generalization of entrainment detection under the constructed label process.
    §IV experimental protocol; ordinary ML evaluation assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 16095 in / 3784 out tokens · 41443 ms · 2026-07-12T10:33:22.826423+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

With the proliferation of speech AI agents, understanding emotional entrainment in conversational interaction has become increasingly important. Emotional entrainment is shaped by social relationships and conversational context, influencing affective coordination over time. We introduce DyadEE, a dataset for emotional entrainment detection in dyadic speech interactions, containing both emotionally entrained conversations and synthetic interactions where entrainment is disrupted through partner swapping and emotion resynthesis. We further propose TRACE, a window-level framework that models dyadic interaction as ordered sequences of acoustic embeddings derived from emotion fine-tuned Whisper representations, treating each sample as an interaction trace rather than pooled utterances. Experimental results on DyadEE show that incorporating conversational context and relationship information improves emotional entrainment detection, with TRACE achieving the best accuracy of 97.01%.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30543 by Alison Gunzler, Georgi Tinchev, Hao Zhang, Laureano Moro-Vel\'azquez, Sathvik Manikantan Napa Ugandhar, Thomas Thebaud, Venkatesh Ravichandran, Yuzhe Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: TRACE pipeline. Left: DyadEE dataset construction with natural dyads (original conversations and their voice-converted and denoised variants) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SPEARBench: A Benchmark for Naturalness Evaluation in Streaming Speech-to-Speech Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    An open-source benchmark for speech-to-speech models shows that current systems produce intelligible audio but diverge from human conversational behavior in latency, dialect consistency, emotional entrainment, and prosody.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Rhythm perception, speak- ing rate entrainment, and conversational quality: A mediated model,

    C. J. Wynn, T. S. Barrett, and S. A. Borrie, “Rhythm perception, speak- ing rate entrainment, and conversational quality: A mediated model,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2187–2203, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Measuring prosodic entrainment in conversation: A review and comparison of different methods,

    J. Kruyt, D. de Jong, A. D’Ausilio, and ˇS. Be ˇnuˇs, “Measuring prosodic entrainment in conversation: A review and comparison of different methods,”Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 4280–4314, 2023

    2023

  3. [3]

    Relationship between speech entrainment and emotion,

    J. Kejriwal, “Relationship between speech entrainment and emotion,” in2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–4

    2022

  4. [4]

    Physiological coregulation during social support discussions

    K. S. Zee and N. Bolger, “Physiological coregulation during social support discussions.”Emotion, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 825, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Social aspects of entrainment in spoken interaction,

    ˇS. Be ˇnuˇs, “Social aspects of entrainment in spoken interaction,”Cogni- tive Computation, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 802–813, 2014

    2014

  6. [6]

    Investigating affective use and emotional well-being on chatgpt,

    J. Phang, M. Lampe, L. Ahmad, S. Agarwal, C. M. Fang, A. R. Liu, V . Danry, E. Lee, S. W. Chan, P. Pataranutapornet al., “Investigating affective use and emotional well-being on chatgpt,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03888, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Artificial intelligence in positive mental health: a narrative review,

    A. Thakkar, A. Gupta, and A. De Sousa, “Artificial intelligence in positive mental health: a narrative review,”Frontiers in digital health, vol. 6, p. 1280235, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Unpacking the gender-role interaction of prosodic entrainment in chinese long-and-short turn-taking: evidence from per- ceptual and acoustic similarities,

    Y . Sun and H. Ding, “Unpacking the gender-role interaction of prosodic entrainment in chinese long-and-short turn-taking: evidence from per- ceptual and acoustic similarities,”Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1618, 2024

    2024

  9. [9]

    Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions,

    R. Levitan and J. Hirschberg, “Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions,” inInterspeech 2011, 2011, pp. 3081–3084

    2011

  10. [10]

    Modeling empathetic alignment in conversa- tion,

    J. Yang and D. Jurgens, “Modeling empathetic alignment in conversa- tion,” inProceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (V olume 1: Long Papers), 2024, pp. 3127–3148

    2024

  11. [11]

    Autoregressive cross-interlocutor attention scores meaningfully capture conversational dynamics

    M. McNeill and R. Levitan, “Autoregressive cross-interlocutor attention scores meaningfully capture conversational dynamics.” ISCA, 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    Spatiotemporal emotional syn- chrony in dyadic interactions: The role of speech conditions in facial and vocal affective alignment,

    V . R. D. M. Herbuela and Y . Nagai, “Spatiotemporal emotional syn- chrony in dyadic interactions: The role of speech conditions in facial and vocal affective alignment,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13455, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Speech emotion recognition using neural network and mlp classifier,

    J. Joy, A. Kannan, S. Ram, and S. Rama, “Speech emotion recognition using neural network and mlp classifier,”Ijesc, vol. 2020, pp. 25 170– 25 172, 2020

    2020

  14. [14]

    Dyad- former: A multi-modal transformer for long-range modeling of dyadic interactions,

    D. Curto, A. Clap ´es, J. Selva, S. Smeureanu, J. Junior, J. CS, D. Gallardo-Pujol, G. Guilera, D. Leiva, T. B. Moeslundet al., “Dyad- former: A multi-modal transformer for long-range modeling of dyadic interactions,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 2177–2188

    2021

  15. [15]

    Seamless inter- action: Dyadic audiovisual motion modeling and large-scale dataset,

    V . Agrawal, A. Akinyemi, K. Alvero, M. Behrooz, J. Buffalini, F. M. Carlucci, J. Chen, J. Chen, Z. Chen, S. Chenget al., “Seamless inter- action: Dyadic audiovisual motion modeling and large-scale dataset,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22554, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Openai gpt-5 system card,

    A. Singh, A. Fry, A. Perelman, A. Tart, A. Ganesh, A. El-Kishky, A. McLaughlin, A. Low, A. Ostrow, A. Ananthramet al., “Openai gpt-5 system card,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03267, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    V ox-profile: A speech foundation model benchmark for characterizing diverse speaker and speech traits,

    T. Feng, J. Lee, A. Xu, Y . Lee, T. Lertpetchpun, X. Shi, H. Wang, T. Thebaud, L. Moro-Velazquez, D. Byrdet al., “V ox-profile: A speech foundation model benchmark for characterizing diverse speaker and speech traits,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14648, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Emotivoice: a multi-voice and prompt-controlled tts engine,

    NetEase Youdao, “Emotivoice: a multi-voice and prompt-controlled tts engine,” 2024, gitHub repository, commit. Accessed 2026-02-25

    2024

  19. [19]

    Seed-VC: Zero-shot voice conversion with real-time support,

    J. Liet al., “Seed-VC: Zero-shot voice conversion with real-time support,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09943, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Mossformer2: Combining transformer and rnn-free recurrent network for enhanced time-domain monaural speech separation,

    S. Zhao, Y . Ma, C. Ni, C. Zhang, H. Wang, T. H. Nguyen, K. Zhou, J. Q. Yip, D. Ng, and B. Ma, “Mossformer2: Combining transformer and rnn-free recurrent network for enhanced time-domain monaural speech separation,” inICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 10 356–10 360

    2024

  21. [21]

    Fine-tuning whisper on low-resource languages for real-world applica- tions,

    V . Timmel, C. Paonessa, M. V ogel, D. Perruchoud, and R. Kakooee, “Fine-tuning whisper on low-resource languages for real-world applica- tions,” inProceedings of the 10th edition of the Swiss Text Analytics Conference, 2025, pp. 57–65

    2025

  22. [22]

    Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks,

    N. Reimers and I. Gurevych, “Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks,” inProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Hong Kong, China: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019, pp. 3982–3992. [O...

    2019

  23. [23]

    LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models,

    H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozi `ere, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, A. Rodriguez, A. Joulin, E. Grave, and G. Lample, “LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023