pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30751 · v1 · pith:TVRMG3ODnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · 🪐 quant-ph

Schr\"odinger and Heisenberg non-Markovianity in quantum information tasks

Federico Settimo , Kimmo Luoma , Jyrki Piilo , Bassano Vacchini , Dariusz Chru\'sci\'nski , Andrea Smirne This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum non-MarkovianitySchrödinger pictureHeisenberg pictureopen quantum systemsquantum information tasksmemory effectsnoisy channels
0
0 comments X

The pith

Some quantum information tasks require non-Markovian memory in both Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures to show performance revivals, while others need only one.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the same open quantum dynamics can appear memoryless in one picture but not the other. It links these inequivalent memory effects to concrete performance measures in tasks such as noisy-channel communication. Tasks that rely on information transmission need memory signatures in both pictures before their figures of merit revive, whereas other tasks revive with memory in only one picture. The authors also derive conditions that detect non-Markovianity in both pictures from data in a single picture, including the volume of accessible states.

Core claim

Inequivalent non-Markovianity in the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures implies different requirements for quantum information tasks: sending information through a noisy channel exhibits revivals in performance only when memory effects are present in both pictures, while other tasks can revive with memory in just one picture. Necessary conditions for non-Markovianity in both pictures can be obtained by inspecting the dynamics in only one picture.

What carries the argument

The inequivalent definitions of non-Markovianity (memory effects) in the Schrödinger versus Heisenberg pictures, which determine when revivals occur in task performance.

If this is right

  • Noisy-channel communication tasks revive only when both pictures display memory effects.
  • Certain other tasks revive when memory appears in only one picture.
  • The volume of accessible states in one picture serves as a witness for non-Markovianity in both pictures simultaneously.
  • Necessary conditions for dual-picture non-Markovianity follow from single-picture dynamics alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers of quantum communication protocols could choose the picture that matches the dominant noise source to simplify checks for useful memory.
  • The distinction may affect how environmental coupling is modeled when optimizing multiple tasks on the same hardware.
  • Experimental tests on current quantum devices could map which tasks fall into the both-pictures category versus the single-picture category.

Load-bearing premise

The specific dynamics examined are representative of the quantum channels that matter for the tasks, and the two pictures' notions of non-Markovianity are the right ones for predicting when performance revives.

What would settle it

A concrete revival in channel capacity or similar task performance without detectable non-Markovianity in one of the two pictures would show that both pictures are not required.

read the original abstract

Quantum non-Markovianity has been widely studied and connected to the existence of memory effects in the dynamics of open systems. Surprisingly, working in the Schr\"odinger or in the Heisenberg picture can provide inequivalent description non-Markovianity: a process can appear to be memoryless in one picture, while displaying memory effects in the other. Here, we investigate which kind of memory is relevant for different quantum information tasks. Some of them, such as sending information via a noisy channel, require memory in both pictures in order to exhibit revivals in the task performance. For others, only one type of memory is sufficient. We also provide necessary conditions for non-Markovianity in both pictures by only considering the dynamics in one picture, showing for instance that the previously considered witness of Schr\"odinger non-Markovianity in terms of the volume of accessible states does indeed witness non-Markovianity in both pictures at the same time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates inequivalent notions of non-Markovianity arising in the Schrödinger versus Heisenberg pictures for open quantum dynamics. It shows that certain quantum information tasks (e.g., information transmission through noisy channels) exhibit performance revivals only when non-Markovianity is present in both pictures, while other tasks require non-Markovianity in only one picture. Necessary conditions are derived that propagate non-Markovianity from one picture to the other using only the dynamics in a single picture; in particular, the volume of accessible states is shown to witness non-Markovianity simultaneously in both pictures.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a direct, parameter-free link between picture-specific divisibility criteria and task-performance revivals, together with necessary conditions proved from the definitions alone. These features make the internal logic self-contained and falsifiable without auxiliary dynamical assumptions or fitted parameters.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, line 3: 'inequivalent description non-Markovianity' is missing the preposition 'of'.
  2. [§2] §2: the notation for the two divisibility criteria could be aligned more explicitly with the standard references cited, to ease comparison for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the manuscript, and recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are self-contained

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on explicit constructions linking picture-specific divisibility criteria to task-performance revivals, plus direct proofs of necessary conditions for non-Markovianity propagating between pictures. These steps are parameter-free, derived from the definitions of the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures, and do not reduce to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The abstract and described logic exhibit no reductions by construction; the internal derivations remain independent of the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The work relies on standard definitions of non-Markovianity in open quantum systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5718 in / 925 out tokens · 33118 ms · 2026-07-01T02:06:55.943975+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Schr\"odinger and Heisenberg non-Markovianity in quantum information tasks

    or of the guessing probability between states [5, 6]. Heisenberg non-Markovianity, on the other hand, allows for revivals of incompatibility [20]. ∗ fesett@utu.fi In this work, we investigate several additional quantum- information tasks and analyze which type of memory is rel- evant for each of them. We show that some tasks require memory effects only in...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    If there exists a state¯ρ∈ S(H⊗C k)such that(Φ t ⊗id k)[¯ρ]< C, then the dynamics must be SHnCPD

    any local CPTP mapΛis such that(Λ⊗id k)[C]⊆C. If there exists a state¯ρ∈ S(H⊗C k)such that(Φ t ⊗id k)[¯ρ]< C, then the dynamics must be SHnCPD. The same holds if a subset ¯C⊆ B(H⊗C k)is preserved by CPU maps and contains all operators at time s. Proof.Letk=1, but the proof is analogous fork>1. IfΦ S t,s is CPTP then Φt[ρ]= Φ S t,s Φs[ρ] ∈C∀ρ(16) because o...

  3. [3]

    The maximal distance ∥·∥1 between states at time t is greater than at time s max ρ,σ Φt ρ−σ 1 >max ρ,σ Φs ρ−σ 1 .(22)

  4. [4]

    Conversely, if the dynamics is HnPD and either max E,F Φ∗ t E−F ∞ >max E,F Φ∗ s E−F ∞ ,(24) or Φ∗ t E−F ∞ > Φ∗ s E−F ∞ ,(25) for all effects E,F, then the dynamics is SHnPD

    For all statesρ,σ, it holds that Φt ρ−σ 1 > Φs ρ−σ 1 .(23) Then the dynamics is SHnPD. Conversely, if the dynamics is HnPD and either max E,F Φ∗ t E−F ∞ >max E,F Φ∗ s E−F ∞ ,(24) or Φ∗ t E−F ∞ > Φ∗ s E−F ∞ ,(25) for all effects E,F, then the dynamics is SHnPD. Proof.Suppose that the dynamics is HPD and let∆ =ρ−σ, 0 then max ∆ ∥Φt∆∥1 =max ∆ Φs h ΦH t,s[∆] ...

    2024

  5. [5]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University PressOxford, 2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    Vacchini,Open Quantum Systems, Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

    B. Vacchini,Open Quantum Systems, Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Buscemi and N

    F. Buscemi and N. Datta, Equivalence between divisibility and monotonic decrease of information in classical and quantum stochastic processes, Physical Review A93, 1 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    H. P. Breuer, E. M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 021002 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 210401 (2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    Measure for the Non-Markovianity of Quantum Processes

    E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H.-P. Breuer, Measure for the non- Markovianity of quantum processes, Physical Review A81, 062115 (2010), arXiv:1002.2583

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Wißmann, H.-P

    S. Wißmann, H.-P. Breuer, and B. Vacchini, Generalized trace-distance measure connecting quantum and classical non- markovianity, Physical Review A92, 042108 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    Megier, A

    N. Megier, A. Smirne, and B. Vacchini, Entropic bounds on information backflow, Physical Review Letters127, 10 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.030401 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.030401 2021

  13. [13]

    Smirne, N

    A. Smirne, N. Megier, and B. Vacchini, Holevo skew diver- gence for the characterization of information backflow, Physical Review A106, 012205 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Settimo, H.-P

    F. Settimo, H.-P. Breuer, and B. Vacchini, Entropic and trace- distance-based measures of non-Markovianity, Physical Review A106, 042212 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Entanglement and non-Markovianity of quantum evolutions

    ´A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolutions, Physical Review Letters105, 050403 (2010), arXiv:0911.4270

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    A. A. Budini, Quantum non-markovian environment-to-system backflows of information: Nonoperational vs. operational ap- proaches, Entropy24, 1 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Buscemi, R

    F. Buscemi, R. Gangwar, K. Goswami, H. Badhani, T. Pandit, B. Mohan, S. Das, and M. N. Bera, Causal and noncausal re- vivals of information: A new regime of non-markovianity in quantum stochastic processes, PRX Quantum6, 020316 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    F. A. Pollock, C. Rodr ´ıguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Pater- nostro, and K. Modi, Non-markovian quantum processes: Com- plete framework and efficient characterization, Physical Review A97, 1 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    F. A. Pollock, C. Rodr ´ıguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Pater- nostro, and K. Modi, Operational markov condition for quan- tum processes, Physical Review Letters120, 1 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    Giarmatzi and F

    C. Giarmatzi and F. Costa, Witnessing quantum memory in non-Markovian processes, Quantum5, 1 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    L. S. V . Santos, Z.-P. Xu, J. Piilo, and O. G ¨uhne, Quantifying information flow in quantum processes, Physical Review A112, 022201 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Chru ´sci´nski, A

    D. Chru ´sci´nski, A. Kossakowski, and ´Angel Rivas, Measures of non-Markovianity: Divisibility versus backflow of information, Physical Review A83, 052128 (2011)

    2011

  23. [23]

    Chru ´sci´nski, Dynamical maps beyond Markovian regime, Physics Reports992, 1 (2022)

    D. Chru ´sci´nski, Dynamical maps beyond Markovian regime, Physics Reports992, 1 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Settimo, A

    F. Settimo, A. Smirne, K. Luoma, B. Vacchini, J. Piilo, and D. Chru´sci´nski, Divisibility of Dynamical Maps: Schr ¨odinger Versus Heisenberg Picture, PRX Quantum7, 010340 (2026), arXiv:2506.08103

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Operational Characterization of Divisibility of Dynamical Maps

    J. Bae and D. Chru ´sci´nski, Operational Characterization of Di- visibility of Dynamical Maps, Physical Review Letters117, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.05522

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Settimo, K

    F. Settimo, K. Luoma, J. Piilo, B. Vacchini, A. Smirne, and D. Chru ´sci´nski, Revivals of Bell nonlocality require Schr¨odinger and Heisenberg non-Markovianity, arXiv preprint (2026)

    2026

  27. [27]

    Gorini, A

    V . Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N -level systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  28. [28]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Communications in Mathematical Physics48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semi- groups, Communications in Mathematical Physics48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  29. [29]

    Quantum Non-Markovianity: Characterization, Quantification and Detection

    ´A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non- Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detec- tion, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 094001 (2014), arXiv:1405.0303

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Kossakowski, On necessary and sufficient conditions for a generator of a quantum dynamical semi-group, Bull

    A. Kossakowski, On necessary and sufficient conditions for a generator of a quantum dynamical semi-group, Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., S´er. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys.20, 1021 (1972)

    1972

  31. [31]

    Optimal state pairs for non-Markovian quantum dynamics

    S. Wimann, A. Karlsson, E. M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H.-P. Breuer, Optimal state pairs for non-Markovian quantum dy- namics, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics86, 1 (2012), arXiv:1209.4989

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    C. A. Fuchs and J. van de Graaf, Cryptographic distinguishabil- ity measures for quantum-mechanical states, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory45, 1216 (1999)

    1999

  33. [33]

    Heinosaari and M

    T. Heinosaari and M. Ziman,The Mathematical Language of Quantum Theory: From Uncertainty to Entanglement(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    2011

  34. [34]

    C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations, Physi- cal Review A53, 2046 (1996)

    2046

  35. [35]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 865 (2009), arXiv:0702225 [quant-ph]

    2009

  36. [36]

    Paulsen,Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Algebras (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    V . Paulsen,Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Algebras (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    2003

  37. [37]

    Incompatibility breaking quantum channels

    T. Heinosaari, J. Kiukas, D. Reitzner, and J. Schultz, Incompat- ibility breaking quantum channels, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical48, 1 (2015), arXiv:1504.05768

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Noise Robustness of the Incompatibility of Quantum Measurements

    T. Heinosaari, J. Kiukas, and D. Reitzner, Noise robustness of the incompatibility of quantum measurements, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics92, 10.1103/Phys- RevA.92.022115 (2015), arXiv:1501.04554

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/phys- 2015

  39. [39]

    Carollo and S

    F. Carollo and S. Wald, Stochastic resetting induces quantum non-Markovianity (2026), arXiv:2601.13367

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Horodecki, P

    M. Horodecki, P. W. Shor, and M. B. Ruskai, Entanglement Breaking Channels, Reviews in Mathematical Physics15, 629 (2003), arXiv:0302032 [quant-ph]

    2003

  41. [41]

    Geometrical characterization of non-Markovianity

    S. Lorenzo, F. Plastina, and M. Paternostro, Geometrical char- acterization of non-Markovianity, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics88, 1 (2013), arXiv:1302.6673

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    M. M. Wolf and J. I. Cirac, Dividing quantum channels, Communications in Mathematical Physics279, 147 (2008), arXiv:0611057 [math-ph]

    2008

  43. [43]

    M. J. Hall, J. D. Cresser, L. Li, and E. Andersson, Canon- ical form of master equations and characterization of non- Markovianity, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics89, 1 (2014), arXiv:1009.0845

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    A. S. Holevo and V . Giovannetti, Quantum channels and their entropic characteristics, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 10.1088/0034-4885/75/4/046001 (2012), arXiv:1202.6480

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/4/046001 2012

  45. [45]

    C. H. Bennett, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and A. V . Thapliyal, Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel and the reverse Shannon theorem, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory48, 2637 (2002), arXiv:0106052 [quant-ph]

    2002

  46. [46]

    M. M. Wilde,Quantum Information Theory(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2013) p. 4

    2013

  47. [47]

    Lloyd, Capacity of the noisy quantum channel, Physical Re- view A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics55, 1613 (1997), arXiv:9604015 [quant-ph]

    S. Lloyd, Capacity of the noisy quantum channel, Physical Re- view A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics55, 1613 (1997), arXiv:9604015 [quant-ph]

    1997

  48. [48]

    Bylicka, D

    B. Bylicka, D. Chru ´sci´nski, and S. Maniscalco, Non- Markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: A quantum information theory perspective, Scientific Reports4, 1 (2014)

    2014

  49. [49]

    Devetak and P

    I. Devetak and P. W. Shor, The capacity of a quantum chan- nel for simultaneous transmission of classical and quantum in- formation, Communications in Mathematical Physics256, 287 (2005), arXiv:0311131 [quant-ph]

    2005

  50. [50]

    Aharonov, A

    D. Aharonov, A. Kitaev, and N. Nisan, Quantum Circuits with Mixed States, Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM sym- posium on Theory of computing - STOC ’98 , 20 (1998), arXiv:9806029 [quant-ph]

    1998

  51. [51]

    Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    J. Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  52. [52]

    C. E. Shannon, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal27, 379 (1948)

    1948

  53. [53]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, 2005)

    2005