Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 1 cited by

Koopman operator theory: fundamentals, control, and applications

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-03 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Koopman operator turns nonlinear dynamics into linear representations using observable functions.

desk verdict This is a tutorial restating standard Koopman operator material and EDMD techniques with demos, not a source of new results. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.01819 v1 pith:RRVDV67Z submitted 2026-07-02 eess.SY cs.LGcs.SY

Igor Mezić , Jorge Cortés , Karl Worthmann , Mircea Lazar , Armin Lederer This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.LGcs.SY
keywords Koopmanoperatordynamicalsystemsextendeddynamicmodedecompositiondata-drivenmodelingmodelpredictivecontrolnonlinearand
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents Koopman operator theory as a framework that represents complex nonlinear dynamical systems through linear evolution of observable functions. It explains how data-driven methods such as extended dynamic mode decomposition generate finite-dimensional approximations that include explicit error bounds for finite data. The tutorial emphasizes extensions to input-driven systems and their use in controller synthesis, including Koopman-based model predictive control. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach lets standard linear control tools apply directly to systems that are otherwise nonlinear.

What carries the argument

The Koopman operator, which evolves observable functions linearly to capture the full nonlinear state evolution.

What would settle it

A concrete dynamical system for which every choice of observable functions produces approximations whose error bounds grow without bound or fail to capture the dynamics on a positive-measure set.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The Koopman operator describes nonlinear dynamics in a linear way through the lens of real- or complex-valued observable functions, and recently proposed data-driven techniques like EDMD can generate finite-dimensional approximations accompanied by finite-data error bounds.

Load-bearing premise

Suitable observable functions exist that yield a useful global linear representation for the systems of interest.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Finite-dimensional EDMD approximations become practical surrogate models for simulation and prediction.
  • Systems with inputs admit direct extensions that preserve the linear structure for control design.
  • Koopman MPC applies linear predictive control to originally nonlinear plants while retaining stability guarantees from the linear theory.
  • Kernelized and machine-learning variants of EDMD improve scalability when the observable space must be learned from data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be tested on high-dimensional fluid or power-system models where traditional linearization fails at large deviations.
  • Error-bound results open a route to certified learning-based controllers whose guarantees do not rely on local linearization.
  • Choice of observables may be automated by combining the theory with dictionary-learning algorithms that minimize the reported error bounds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a tutorial paper introducing Koopman operator theory for global linear representations of nonlinear dynamics via observables, data-driven finite-dimensional approximations such as EDMD (including kernelized and ML variants) with finite-data error bounds, extensions to systems with inputs, and control applications including Koopman MPC. It includes simulation studies and GitHub source code for step-by-step demonstration.

Significance. As a tutorial, the work has value in consolidating established Koopman methods for the systems and control audience and in providing reproducible simulation examples with code; this supports accessibility and adoption without advancing new theorems or empirical claims.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'recently proposed data-driven techniques... can be used to generate... accompanied by finite-data error bounds' could more clearly attribute the error-bound results to the cited literature rather than the tutorial itself.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement early in the introduction that it is an expository tutorial rather than a research contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a tutorial consolidating Koopman methods with reproducible examples and code, and for the recommendation to accept. The referee's summary accurately reflects the paper's scope and contributions. There are no major comments to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Tutorial paper with no novel derivations or fitted results

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a tutorial providing a concise introduction to established Koopman operator theory, EDMD, and related control methods, along with demonstrations and open-source simulations. No new derivation chain, parameter fitting, or predictive claim is advanced that could reduce to its own inputs by construction. All referenced results (operator properties, finite-data error bounds) are attributed to prior literature without self-citation load-bearing on novel content. The central purpose is exposition rather than advancement of a theorem or empirical result, making the derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a tutorial on established Koopman operator theory with no new mathematical contributions, free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Koopman operator theory: fundamentals, control, and applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RRVDV67Z

@misc{pith2026260701819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Koopman operator theory: fundamentals, control, and applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RRVDV67Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.01819}
}
read the original abstract

The Koopman operator has gained considerable attention due to its ability to provide a global linear representation of highly complex dynamical systems. The operator describes nonlinear dynamics in a linear way through the lens of real- or complex-valued observable functions. Recently proposed data-driven techniques, like extended dynamic mode decomposition (EDMD), its kernelized variant, and machine-learning methods, can be used to generate finite-dimensional approximations accompanied by finite-data error bounds. In this tutorial paper, we provide a concise introduction into Koopman operator theory and its use in systems and control. A particular focus is put on data-driven surrogate models, their extension to systems with inputs, and controller design using Koopman operator theory. Moreover, we demonstrate the key techniques, i.e., EDMD and Koopman MPC. To this end, we provide simulation studies including source code on GitHub to enable the interested reader to experience the Koopman operator in systems and control step by step.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01819 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the lack of Koopman invariance of the subspace [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the state space reprojections commonly used to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. One-step prediction errors for different dictionaries. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average one-step prediction and training errors depending on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example trajectories (black) for long-term prediction using different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Additionally, the RKHS of these kernels is well un [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of different kernel functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phase trajectory plot, Duffing. training trajectory we extract sliding windows of horizon Ht, select a diverse subset of M windows by k-means on the stacked window descriptor [ z (0); z (H/2); z (H) ] (start, midpoint, and end of the lifted window). Then we keep the wi…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Phase trajectory plot, DC motor. Training and evaluation setting. We fit each form with one￾step and multi-step regression: one-step pairs are subsampled uniformly from all training transitions, and multi-step pairs are extracted from the selected sliding windows ( Ht…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: State error rollout, DC motor. TABLE III FORCED DUFFING OSCILLATOR. KCF COUPLES THE INPUT TO 6 OF THE 15 LIFT FEATURES (s = 33). MULTI-STEP OPEN-LOOP STATE ERROR OVER Ntest = 10 ICS, Ttest = 150. MAE ∥xˆ − x ∗∥ (multi-step) Op. norm Form median mean worst ∥ · ∥F Linea…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Closed-loop Koopman MPC results, Duffing oscillator. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Closed-loop Koopman MPC results, DC motor. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Machines that Predict Trajectories from Templates

    eess.SY 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Trajectory libraries define behavioral spaces that enable exact future prediction from past windows under continuation maps, spectral inclusion of visible eigenvalues, and immersion conditions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

202 extracted references · 202 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Isidori,Nonlinear Control Systems: An Introduction

    A. Isidori,Nonlinear Control Systems: An Introduction. Springer, 1985

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Krstic, P

    M. Krstic, P. V . Kokotovic, and I. Kanellakopoulos,Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    H. K. Khalil and J. W. Grizzle,Nonlinear Systems, vol. 3. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Blanchini and S

    F. Blanchini and S. Miani,Set-Theoretic Methods in Control, vol. 78. Springer, 2008

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    A Koopman Operator-based Prediction Algorithm and its Application to COVID- 19 Pandemic and Influenza Cases,

    I. Mezi ´c, Z. Drma ˇc, N. ˇCrnjari´c, S. Ma ´ceˇsi´c, M. Fonoberova, R. Mohr, A. M. Avila, I. Manojlovi´c, and A. Andrejˇcuk, “A Koopman Operator-based Prediction Algorithm and its Application to COVID- 19 Pandemic and Influenza Cases,”Scientific reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 5788, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Control,

    B. Recht, “A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Control,”Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Au- tonomous Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 253–279, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Analysis of Gain Scheduled Control for Nonlinear Plants,

    J. S. Shamma and M. Athans, “Analysis of Gain Scheduled Control for Nonlinear Plants,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 898–907, 2002

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    Comparison of Systems with Complex Behavior,

    I. Mezi ´c and A. Banaszuk, “Comparison of Systems with Complex Behavior,”Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 197, no. 1–2, pp. 101–133, 2004

    work page 2004

Show all 202 references
  1. [9]

    Spectral Properties of Dynamical Systems, Model Reduc- tion and Decompositions,

    I. Mezi ´c, “Spectral Properties of Dynamical Systems, Model Reduc- tion and Decompositions,”Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 41, pp. 309– 325, 2005

    2005

  2. [10]

    Spectral Analysis of Nonlinear Flows,

    C. W. Rowley, I. Mezi ´c, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Hen- ningson, “Spectral Analysis of Nonlinear Flows,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 641, pp. 115–127, 2009

    2009

  3. [11]

    An Overview of Koopman-based Control: From Error Bounds to Closed-Loop Guarantees,

    R. Str ¨asser, K. Worthmann, I. Mezi ´c, J. Berberich, M. Schaller, and F. Allg¨ower, “An Overview of Koopman-based Control: From Error Bounds to Closed-Loop Guarantees,”Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 61:101035, 2026

    2026

  4. [12]

    Global Stability Analysis using the Eigenfunctions of the Koopman Operator,

    A. Mauroy and I. Mezi ´c, “Global Stability Analysis using the Eigenfunctions of the Koopman Operator,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 3356–3369, 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Koopman Kernel Regression,

    P. Bevanda, M. Beier, A. Lederer, S. Sosnowski, E. H ¨ullermeier, and S. Hirche, “Koopman Kernel Regression,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 16207–16221, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Koopman Operator Dynamical Models: Learning, Analysis and Control,

    P. Bevanda, S. Sosnowski, and S. Hirche, “Koopman Operator Dynamical Models: Learning, Analysis and Control,”Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 52, pp. 197–212, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systems,

    S. L. Brunton, M. Budi ˇsi´c, E. Kaiser, and J. N. Kutz, “Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systems,”SIAM Review, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    Mauroy, Y

    A. Mauroy, Y . Susuki, and I. Mezi ´c,Koopman Operator in Systems and Control, vol. 484. Springer, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    SafEDMD: A Koopman-based Data-Driven Controller Design Framework for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,

    R. Str ¨asser, M. Schaller, K. Worthmann, J. Berberich, and F. Allg¨ower, “SafEDMD: A Koopman-based Data-Driven Controller Design Framework for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,”Automatica, vol. 185:112732, 2026

    2026

  10. [18]

    Koopman Operators in Robot Learning,

    L. Shi, M. Haseli, G. Mamakoukas, D. Bruder, I. Abraham, T. Mur- phey, J. Cort ´es, and K. Karydis, “Koopman Operators in Robot Learning,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2026

    2026

  11. [19]

    L∞-Error Bounds for Approximations of the Koopman Operator by Kernel Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition,

    F. K ¨ohne, F. M. Philipp, M. Schaller, A. Schiela, and K. Worthmann, “L∞-Error Bounds for Approximations of the Koopman Operator by Kernel Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition,”SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 501–529, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Bernard Osgood Koopman, 1900–1981,

    P. M. Morse, “Bernard Osgood Koopman, 1900–1981,”Operations Research, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 417–427, 1982

    1900

  13. [21]

    Hamiltonian Systems and Transformation in Hilbert Space,

    B. O. Koopman, “Hamiltonian Systems and Transformation in Hilbert Space,”Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 315– 318, 1931

    1931

  14. [22]

    Dynamical Systems of Contin- uous Spectra,

    B. O. Koopman and J. v. Neumann, “Dynamical Systems of Contin- uous Spectra,”Proc. National Academy of Sciences, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 255–263, 1932

    1932

  15. [23]

    Comparison of Systems with Complex Behavior: Spectral Methods,

    I. Mezi ´c and A. Banaszuk, “Comparison of Systems with Complex Behavior: Spectral Methods,” inProc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, vol. 2, pp. 1224–1231, 2000

    2000

  16. [24]

    Koopman Operator Spectrum for Random Dynamical Systems,

    N. ˇCrnjari´c- ˇZic, S. Ma ´ceˇsi´c, and I. Mezi ´c, “Koopman Operator Spectrum for Random Dynamical Systems,”Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2007–2056, 2020

    2007

  17. [25]

    On Robust Computation of Koopman Operator and Prediction in Random Dynamical Systems,

    S. Sinha, B. Huang, and U. Vaidya, “On Robust Computation of Koopman Operator and Prediction in Random Dynamical Systems,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2057–2090, 2020

  18. [26]

    Robust Approximation of the Stochastic Koopman Operator,

    M. Wanner and I. Mezi ´c, “Robust Approximation of the Stochastic Koopman Operator,”SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1930–1951, 2022

    1930

  19. [27]

    Koopman for Stochastic Dynamics: Error Bounds for Kernel Extended Dy- namic Mode Decomposition,

    M. Hertel, F. M. Philipp, M. Schaller, and K. Worthmann, “Koopman for Stochastic Dynamics: Error Bounds for Kernel Extended Dy- namic Mode Decomposition,”SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, to appear, ArXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20247, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Variational Koopman Models: Slow Collective Variables and Molecular Kinetics from Short Off-Equilibrium Simulations,

    H. Wu, F. N ¨uske, F. Paul, S. Klus, P. Koltai, and F. No´e, “Variational Koopman Models: Slow Collective Variables and Molecular Kinetics from Short Off-Equilibrium Simulations,”The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 146, no. 15, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Data- Driven Characterization and Acceleration of Metastable Dynamics Using Koopman Operators,

    J. Luzzatto, F. N ¨uske, N. G. Hadjiconstantinou, and D. Perez, “Data- Driven Characterization and Acceleration of Metastable Dynamics Using Koopman Operators,”Journal of Chemical Theory and Com- putation, 2026

    2026

  22. [30]

    Spectrum of the Koopman Operator, Spectral Expansions in Functional Spaces, and State-Space Geometry.,

    I. Mezi ´c, “Spectrum of the Koopman Operator, Spectral Expansions in Functional Spaces, and State-Space Geometry.,”Journal of Non- linear Science, vol. 30, no. 5, p. 2091, 2020

  23. [31]

    Yosida,Functional Analysis

    K. Yosida,Functional Analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Mezi ´c,Koopman Operators: Spectra, Function Spaces, and Rep- resentations, pp

    I. Mezi ´c,Koopman Operators: Spectra, Function Spaces, and Rep- resentations, pp. 1–67. Basel: Springer Basel, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Koopman Framework for Global Stability Analysis,

    A. Mauroy, A. Sootla, and I. Mezi ´c, “Koopman Framework for Global Stability Analysis,” inThe Koopman Operator in Systems and Control: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications, pp. 35–58, Springer, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    A Spectral Operator-Theoretic Framework for Global Stability,

    A. Mauroy and I. Mezi ´c, “A Spectral Operator-Theoretic Framework for Global Stability,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, pp. 5234–5239, 2013

    2013

  27. [35]

    Modeling Nonlinear Control Systems via Koopman Control Family: Universal Forms and Subspace Invariance Proximity,

    M. Haseli and J. Cort ´es, “Modeling Nonlinear Control Systems via Koopman Control Family: Universal Forms and Subspace Invariance Proximity,”Automatica, vol. 185:112722, 2026

    2026

  28. [36]

    Invariance Proximity: Closed-Form Er- ror Bounds for Finite-Dimensional Koopman-Based Models,

    M. Haseli and J. Cort ´es, “Invariance Proximity: Closed-Form Er- ror Bounds for Finite-Dimensional Koopman-Based Models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13033, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Essai sur la g ´eom´etrie `andimensions,

    C. Jordan, “Essai sur la g ´eom´etrie `andimensions,”Bulletin de la Soci´et´e math ´ematique de France, vol. 3, pp. 103–174, 1875

  30. [38]

    Relations between Two Sets of Variates,

    H. Hotelling, “Relations between Two Sets of Variates,” inBreak- throughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution, pp. 162–190, New York, NY: Springer, 1992

    1992

  31. [39]

    Repro- jection Methods for Koopman-based Modelling and Prediction,

    P. Van Goor, R. Mahony, M. Schaller, and K. Worthmann, “Repro- jection Methods for Koopman-based Modelling and Prediction,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, pp. 315–321, 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    J. M. Lee,Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Springer, 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    Koopman-based Lifting Techniques for Nonlinear Systems Identification,

    A. Mauroy and J. Goncalves, “Koopman-based Lifting Techniques for Nonlinear Systems Identification,”IEEE Transactions on Auto- matic Control, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2550–2565, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Maximum-likelihood reprojections for reliable koopman-based pre- dictions and bifurcation analysis of parametric dynamical systems,

    P. van Goor, R. Mahony, M. Schaller, and K. Worthmann, “Maximum-likelihood reprojections for reliable koopman-based pre- dictions and bifurcation analysis of parametric dynamical systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17817, 2025

    2025

  35. [43]

    The Multiverse of Dynamic Mode Decomposition Algorithms,

    M. J. Colbrook, “The Multiverse of Dynamic Mode Decomposition Algorithms,” inHandbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. 25, pp. 127– 230, Elsevier, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    On Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Theory and Applications,

    J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, D. M. Luchtenburg, S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz, “On Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Theory and Applications,” Journal of Computational Dynamics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 391–421, 2014

    2014

  37. [45]

    Model Reduction for Flow Analysis and Control,

    C. W. Rowley and S. T. Dawson, “Model Reduction for Flow Analysis and Control,”Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 49, pp. 387–417, 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    Generalizing Dynamic Mode Decomposi- tion: Balancing Accuracy and Expressiveness in Koopman Approxi- mations,

    M. Haseli and J. Cort ´es, “Generalizing Dynamic Mode Decomposi- tion: Balancing Accuracy and Expressiveness in Koopman Approxi- mations,”Automatica, vol. 153, p. 111001, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Recursive Forward-Backward EDMD: Guaranteed Algebraic Search for Koopman Invariant Subspaces,

    M. Haseli and J. Cort ´es, “Recursive Forward-Backward EDMD: Guaranteed Algebraic Search for Koopman Invariant Subspaces,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 61006–61025, 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Scalable Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition Using Random Kernel Approximation,

    A. M. DeGennaro and N. M. Urban, “Scalable Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition Using Random Kernel Approximation,”SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. A1482–a1499, 2019

    2019

  41. [49]

    Orthogonal Polynomial Approximation and Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition in Chaos,

    C. Wormell, “Orthogonal Polynomial Approximation and Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition in Chaos,”SIAM Journal on Numer- ical Analysis, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 122–148, 2025

    2025

  42. [50]

    A Data– Driven Approximation of the Koopman Operator: Extending Dy- namic Mode Decomposition,

    M. O. Williams, I. G. Kevrekidis, and C. W. Rowley, “A Data– Driven Approximation of the Koopman Operator: Extending Dy- namic Mode Decomposition,”Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1307–1346, 2015

    2015

  43. [51]

    Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Dictionary Learning: A Data- Driven Adaptive Spectral Decomposition of the Koopman Operator,

    Q. Li, F. Dietrich, E. M. Bollt, and I. G. Kevrekidis, “Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Dictionary Learning: A Data- Driven Adaptive Spectral Decomposition of the Koopman Operator,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 27, no. 10, 2017

    2017

  44. [52]

    Deep Learning for Universal Linear Embeddings of Nonlinear Dynamics,

    B. Lusch, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton, “Deep Learning for Universal Linear Embeddings of Nonlinear Dynamics,”Nature com- munications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4950, 2018

    2018

  45. [53]

    Random Features for Large-Scale Kernel Machines,

    A. Rahimi and B. Recht, “Random Features for Large-Scale Kernel Machines,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 20, 2007

    2007

  46. [54]

    Koopman Operator Framework for Spectral Analysis and Identification of Infinite-Dimensional Systems,

    A. Mauroy, “Koopman Operator Framework for Spectral Analysis and Identification of Infinite-Dimensional Systems,”Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 19, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Temporal Forward–Backward Consistency, Not Residual Error, Measures the Prediction Accuracy of Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition,

    M. Haseli and J. Cort ´es, “Temporal Forward–Backward Consistency, Not Residual Error, Measures the Prediction Accuracy of Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 649–654, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    Data-Driven Approximation of the Koopman Generator: Model Reduction, System Identification, and Control,

    S. Klus, F. N ¨uske, S. Peitz, J.-H. Niemann, C. Clementi, and C. Sch¨utte, “Data-Driven Approximation of the Koopman Generator: Model Reduction, System Identification, and Control,”Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 406, p. 132416, 2020

    2020

  49. [57]

    Linear Identification of Nonlinear Systems: A Lifting Technique based on the Koopman Operator,

    A. Mauroy and J. Goncalves, “Linear Identification of Nonlinear Systems: A Lifting Technique based on the Koopman Operator,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, pp. 6500–6505, 2016

    2016

  50. [58]

    J. P. Boyd,Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods. Courier Dover Publications, 2013

    2013

  51. [59]

    On Convergence of Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition to the Koopman Operator,

    M. Korda and I. Mezi ´c, “On Convergence of Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition to the Koopman Operator,”Journal of Nonlin- ear Science, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 687–710, 2018

    2018

  52. [60]

    Applied Koopman Theory for Partial Differential Equations and Data-Driven Mod- eling of Spatio-Temporal Systems,

    J. Nathan Kutz, J. L. Proctor, and S. L. Brunton, “Applied Koopman Theory for Partial Differential Equations and Data-Driven Mod- eling of Spatio-Temporal Systems,”Complexity, vol. 2018, no. 1, p. 6010634, 2018

    2018

  53. [61]

    Ergodic Theory, Dynamic Mode Decom- position, and Computation of Spectral Properties of the Koopman Operator,

    H. Arbabi and I. Mezi ´c, “Ergodic Theory, Dynamic Mode Decom- position, and Computation of Spectral Properties of the Koopman Operator,”SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2096–2126, 2017

  54. [62]

    Time-Delay Observables for Koopman: Theory and Applications,

    M. Kamb, E. Kaiser, S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz, “Time-Delay Observables for Koopman: Theory and Applications,”SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 886–917, 2020

    2020

  55. [63]

    The Takens Embedding Theorem,

    L. Noakes, “The Takens Embedding Theorem,”Int. Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 1, no. 04, pp. 867–872, 1991

    1991

  56. [64]

    Isostables, Isochrons, and Koopman Spectrum for the Action–Angle Representation of Stable Fixed Point Dynamics,

    A. Mauroy, I. Mezi ´c, and J. Moehlis, “Isostables, Isochrons, and Koopman Spectrum for the Action–Angle Representation of Stable Fixed Point Dynamics,”Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 261, pp. 19–30, 2013

    2013

  57. [65]

    Construction of Eigenfunctions for Scalar- Type Operators via Laplace Averages with Connections to the Koop- man Operator,

    R. Mohr and I. Mezi ´c, “Construction of Eigenfunctions for Scalar- Type Operators via Laplace Averages with Connections to the Koop- man Operator,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.6559, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  58. [66]

    On Numerical Approximations of the Koopman Operator,

    I. Mezi ´c, “On Numerical Approximations of the Koopman Operator,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 7:1180, 2022

    2022

  59. [67]

    Variants of Dynamic Mode De- composition: Boundary Condition, Koopman, and Fourier Analyses,

    K. Chen, J. Tu, and C. Rowley, “Variants of Dynamic Mode De- composition: Boundary Condition, Koopman, and Fourier Analyses,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 887–915, 2012

    2012

  60. [68]

    A Computational Method to Extract Macroscopic Variables and Their Dynamics in Multiscale Systems,

    G. Froyland, G. A. Gottwald, and A. Hammerlindl, “A Computational Method to Extract Macroscopic Variables and Their Dynamics in Multiscale Systems,”SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1816–1846, 2014

    2014

  61. [69]

    Spectral Pollution and How to Avoid It,

    M. Lewin and ´E. S ´er´e, “Spectral Pollution and How to Avoid It,” Proc. London Mathematical Society, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 864–900, 2010

    2010

  62. [70]

    Spectral Pollution and Second- Order Relative Spectra for Self-Adjoint Operators,

    M. Levitin and E. Shargorodsky, “Spectral Pollution and Second- Order Relative Spectra for Self-Adjoint Operators,”IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 393–416, 2004

    2004

  63. [71]

    How to Compute Spectra with Error Control,

    M. J. Colbrook, B. Roman, and A. C. Hansen, “How to Compute Spectra with Error Control,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 122, no. 25:250201, 2019

    2019

  64. [72]

    Rigorous Data-Driven Computa- tion of Spectral Properties of Koopman Operators for Dynamical Sys- tems,

    M. J. Colbrook and A. Townsend, “Rigorous Data-Driven Computa- tion of Spectral Properties of Koopman Operators for Dynamical Sys- tems,”Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 221–283, 2024

    2024

  65. [73]

    Data Driven Modal Decom- positions: Analysis and Enhancements,

    Z. Drma ˇc, I. Mezi ´c, and R. Mohr, “Data Driven Modal Decom- positions: Analysis and Enhancements,”SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. A2253–a2285, 2018

    2018

  66. [74]

    Analytic Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition,

    A. Mauroy and I. Mezi ´c’, “Analytic Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15945, 2024

    2024

  67. [75]

    Adversarial Dynam- ical Systems Characterize when Data-Driven Learning Succeeds or Fails,

    M. J. Colbrook, I. Mezi ´c, and A. Stepanenko, “Adversarial Dynam- ical Systems Characterize when Data-Driven Learning Succeeds or Fails,”Accepted to Nature Communications, 2026

    2026

  68. [76]

    M. J. Colbrook,Infinite-Dimensional Spectral Computations: Foun- dations, Algorithms, and Modern Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2026

    2026

  69. [77]

    Analysis of Fluid Flows via Spectral Properties of the Koopman Operator,

    I. Mezi ´c, “Analysis of Fluid Flows via Spectral Properties of the Koopman Operator,”Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 357–378, 2013

    2013

  70. [78]

    A Kernel- Based Method for Data-Driven Koopman Spectral Analysis,

    M. O. Williams, C. W. Rowley, and I. G. Kevrekidis, “A Kernel- Based Method for Data-Driven Koopman Spectral Analysis,”Journal of Computational Dynamics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 247–265, 2016

    2016

  71. [79]

    Sch ¨olkopf and A

    B. Sch ¨olkopf and A. J. Smola,Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. The MIT Press, 2002

    2002

  72. [80]

    Berlinet and C

    A. Berlinet and C. Thomas-Agnan,Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces in Probability and Statistics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

    2011

  73. [81]

    A Primer on Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces,

    J. H. Manton and P.-O. Amblard, “A Primer on Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces,”Foundations & Trends in Signal Processing, vol. 8, no. 1–2, p. 1–126, 2015

    2015

  74. [82]

    Kernel-based Approximation of the Koopman Generator and Schr¨odinger Operator,

    S. Klus, F. N ¨uske, and B. Hamzi, “Kernel-based Approximation of the Koopman Generator and Schr¨odinger Operator,”Entropy, vol. 22, no. 7, p. 722, 2020

    2020

  75. [83]

    Spatial Variation: Meddelanden fran Statens Skogs- forskningsinstitut,

    B. Mat ´ern, “Spatial Variation: Meddelanden fran Statens Skogs- forskningsinstitut,”Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 36, p. 21, 1960

    1960

  76. [84]

    Wendland,Scattered Data Approximation

    H. Wendland,Scattered Data Approximation. No. 17 in Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  77. [85]

    Universal Kernels,

    C. A. Micchelli, Y . Xu, and H. Zhang, “Universal Kernels,”Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 7, no. 95, pp. 2651–2667, 2006

    2006

  78. [86]

    Information Rates of Non- parametric Gaussian Process Methods,

    A. van der Vaart and H. van Zanten, “Information Rates of Non- parametric Gaussian Process Methods,”Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, no. 60, pp. 2095–2119, 2011

  79. [87]

    Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalences,

    M. Kanagawa, P. Hennig, D. Sejdinovic, and B. K. Sriperumbudur, “Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalences,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02582, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  80. [88]

    The Kernel Perspective on Dynamic Mode Decomposition,

    E. Gonzalez, M. Abudia, M. Jury, R. Kamalapurkar, and J. A. Rosen- feld, “The Kernel Perspective on Dynamic Mode Decomposition,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024

    2024

  81. [89]

    Using the Nystr ¨om Method to Speed up Lernel Machines,

    C. Williams and M. Seeger, “Using the Nystr ¨om Method to Speed up Lernel Machines,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2000

    2000

  82. [90]

    Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebra,

    D. P. Woodruff, “Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebra,” Foundations & Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 1–157, 2014

    2014

  83. [91]

    Kernel Methods through the Roof: Handling Billions of Points Efficiently,

    G. Meanti, L. Carratino, L. Rosasco, and A. Rudi, “Kernel Methods through the Roof: Handling Billions of Points Efficiently,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 14410–14422, 2020

    2020

  84. [92]

    A Quantitative Analysis of Koopman Op- erator Methods for System Identification and Predictions,

    C. Zhang and E. Zuazua, “A Quantitative Analysis of Koopman Op- erator Methods for System Identification and Predictions,”Comptes Rendus. M ´ecanique, vol. 351, no. S1, pp. 1–31, 2023

    2023

  85. [93]

    Finite-Data Error Bounds for Koopman-based Prediction and Con- trol,

    F. N ¨uske, S. Peitz, F. Philipp, M. Schaller, and K. Worthmann, “Finite-Data Error Bounds for Koopman-based Prediction and Con- trol,”Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 33:14, 2023

    2023

  86. [94]

    Variance Representations and Convergence Rates for Data-Driven Approximations of Koopman Operators,

    F. M. Philipp, M. Schaller, S. Boshoff, S. Peitz, F. N ¨uske, and K. Worthmann, “Variance Representations and Convergence Rates for Data-Driven Approximations of Koopman Operators,”Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 135223, 2026

    2026

  87. [95]

    Towards Reliable Data-Based Optimal and Predictive Control using Extended DMD,

    M. Schaller, K. Worthmann, F. Philipp, S. Peitz, and F. N ¨uske, “Towards Reliable Data-Based Optimal and Predictive Control using Extended DMD,”IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 169–174, 2023

    2023

  88. [96]

    Diffeomorphically Learning Stable Koopman Operators,

    P. Bevanda, M. Beier, S. Kerz, A. Lederer, S. Sosnowski, and S. Hirche, “Diffeomorphically Learning Stable Koopman Operators,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 6, pp. 3427–3432, 2022

    2022

  89. [97]

    Shaping the Koopman Dictionary by Learning on the Grassmannian,

    R. Schurig, P. van Goor, K. Worthmann, and R. Findeisen, “Shaping the Koopman Dictionary by Learning on the Grassmannian,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07234, 2025

    2025

  90. [98]

    Kernel- based Koopman Approximants for Control: Flexible Sampling, Error Analysis, and Stability,

    L. Bold, F. M. Philipp, M. Schaller, and K. Worthmann, “Kernel- based Koopman Approximants for Control: Flexible Sampling, Error Analysis, and Stability,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 4044–4071, 2025

    2025

  91. [99]

    On Excitation of Control-Affine Systems and its Use for Data-Driven Koopman Approximants,

    P. Schmitz, L. Bold, F. M. Philipp, M. Rosenfelder, P. Eberhard, H. Ebel, and K. Worthmann, “On Excitation of Control-Affine Systems and its Use for Data-Driven Koopman Approximants,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.03734, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Error Bounds for Kernel-based Approximations of the Koop- man Operator,

    F. M. Philipp, M. Schaller, K. Worthmann, S. Peitz, and F. N ¨uske, “Error Bounds for Kernel-based Approximations of the Koop- man Operator,”Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, vol. 71:101657, 2024

    2024

  93. [101]

    Error Analysis of Kernel EDMD for Prediction and Control in the Koopman Framework,

    F. M. Philipp, M. Schaller, K. Worthmann, S. Peitz, and F. N ¨uske, “Error Analysis of Kernel EDMD for Prediction and Control in the Koopman Framework,”Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 35:92, 2025

    2025

  94. [102]

    Nonparametric Control Koopman Operators,

    P. Bevanda, B. Driessen, L. C. Iacob, S. Sosnowski, R. T ´oth, and S. Hirche, “Nonparametric Control Koopman Operators,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2026

    2026

  95. [103]

    Koopman-Equivariant Gaussian Processes,

    P. Bevanda, M. Beier, A. Capone, S. G. Sosnowski, S. Hirche, and A. Lederer, “Koopman-Equivariant Gaussian Processes,” inProc. Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2025

    2025

  96. [104]

    Data- Driven Approximation of Koopman Operators and Generators: Con- vergence Rates and Error bounds,

    L. Llamazares-Elias, S. Llamazares-Elias, J. Latz, and S. Klus, “Data- Driven Approximation of Koopman Operators and Generators: Con- vergence Rates and Error bounds,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.00539, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Approximation of the Koopman Operator via Bernstein Polynomials,

    R. Yadav and A. Mauroy, “Approximation of the Koopman Operator via Bernstein Polynomials,”Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 147, p. 108819, 2025

    2025

  98. [106]

    Linear Predictors for Nonlinear Dynami- cal Systems: Koopman Operator Meets Model Predictive Control,

    M. Korda and I. Mezi ´c, “Linear Predictors for Nonlinear Dynami- cal Systems: Koopman Operator Meets Model Predictive Control,” Automatica, vol. 93, pp. 149–160, 2018

    2018

  99. [107]

    Koopman Invariant Subspaces and Finite Linear Representations of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems for Control,

    S. L. Brunton, B. W. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, and J. N. Kutz, “Koopman Invariant Subspaces and Finite Linear Representations of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems for Control,”PLOS One, vol. 11, no. 2, p. e0150171, 2016

    2016

  100. [108]

    On the Existence of Koopman Linear Embeddings for Controlled Nonlinear Systems,

    X. Shang, M. Haseli, J. Cort ´es, and Y . Zheng, “On the Existence of Koopman Linear Embeddings for Controlled Nonlinear Systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.14537, 2026

    2026

  101. [109]

    Willems’ Fundamental Lemma for Nonlinear Systems with Koopman Linear Embedding,

    X. Shang, J. Cort ´es, and Y . Zheng, “Willems’ Fundamental Lemma for Nonlinear Systems with Koopman Linear Embedding,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 8, pp. 3135–3140, 2025

    2025

  102. [110]

    Limitations of LTI Koopman Modeling for Nonlinear Control Systems,

    J. Heeg and K. Worthmann, “Limitations of LTI Koopman Modeling for Nonlinear Control Systems,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2026

    2026

  103. [111]

    Extending Data-Driven Koopman Analysis to Actuated Systems,

    M. O. Williams, M. S. Hemati, S. T. M. Dawson, I. G. Kevrekidis, and C. W. Rowley, “Extending Data-Driven Koopman Analysis to Actuated Systems,”IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 49, no. 18, pp. 704– 709, 2016

    2016

  104. [112]

    Generalizing Koopman Theory to Allow for Inputs and Control,

    J. L. Proctor, S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz, “Generalizing Koopman Theory to Allow for Inputs and Control,”SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 909–930, 2018

    2018

  105. [113]

    From Product Hilbert Spaces to the Generalized Koopman Operator and the Nonlinear Fundamental Lemma,

    M. Lazar, “From Product Hilbert Spaces to the Generalized Koopman Operator and the Nonlinear Fundamental Lemma,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07494v2, 2026

    2026

  106. [114]

    Advantages of Bilinear Koopman Realizations for the Modeling and Control of Systems With Unknown Dynamics,

    D. Bruder, X. Fu, and R. Vasudevan, “Advantages of Bilinear Koopman Realizations for the Modeling and Control of Systems With Unknown Dynamics,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4369–4376, 2021

    2021

  107. [115]

    Kernel-based Error Bounds of Bilinear Koopman Surrogate Models for Nonlinear Data-Driven Control,

    R. Str ¨asser, M. Schaller, J. Berberich, K. Worthmann, and F. Allg ¨ower, “Kernel-based Error Bounds of Bilinear Koopman Surrogate Models for Nonlinear Data-Driven Control,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 9, pp. 1892–1897, 2025

    2025

  108. [116]

    Koopman Data-Driven Predictive Control with Robust Stability and Recursive Feasibility Guarantees,

    T. de Jong, V . Breschi, M. Schoukens, and M. Lazar, “Koopman Data-Driven Predictive Control with Robust Stability and Recursive Feasibility Guarantees,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, pp. 140–145, 2024

    2024

  109. [117]

    Least-Squares Multi-Step Koopman Operator Learning for Model Predictive Control,

    L. Wu, W. G. Y . Tan, L. Zhou, R. D. Braatz, and J. Drgona, “Least-Squares Multi-Step Koopman Operator Learning for Model Predictive Control,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11901, 2026

    2026

  110. [118]

    Koopman Operator Learning for Predictive Control via Khatri–Rao Kernel Regression,

    M. Lazar, “Koopman Operator Learning for Predictive Control via Khatri–Rao Kernel Regression,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.02938, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Control Forward-Backward Consistency: Quantifying the Accuracy of Koopman Control Family Models,

    M. Haseli, J. Cort ´es, and J. W. Burdick, “Control Forward-Backward Consistency: Quantifying the Accuracy of Koopman Control Family Models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.27548, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Linear Observer Synthesis for Non- linear Systems Using Koopman Operator Framework,

    A. Surana and A. Banaszuk, “Linear Observer Synthesis for Non- linear Systems Using Koopman Operator Framework,” inIFAC- PapersOnLine, vol. 49, pp. 716–723, 2016

    2016

  113. [121]

    Koopman Operator Based Observer Synthesis for Control-Affine Nonlinear Systems,

    A. Surana, “Koopman Operator Based Observer Synthesis for Control-Affine Nonlinear Systems,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, pp. 6492–6499, 2016

    2016

  114. [122]

    Nonlinear Observability via Koopman Analysis: Characterizing the Role of Symmetry,

    A. Mesbahi, J. Bu, and M. Mesbahi, “Nonlinear Observability via Koopman Analysis: Characterizing the Role of Symmetry,”Auto- matica, vol. 124, p. 109353, 2021

    2021

  115. [123]

    A Koopman Operator Approach for Computing and Balancing Gramians for Discrete Time Nonlinear Systems,

    E. Yeung, Z. Liu, and N. O. Hodas, “A Koopman Operator Approach for Computing and Balancing Gramians for Discrete Time Nonlinear Systems,” inProc. American Control Conference, pp. 337–344, 2018

    2018

  116. [124]

    Uncertainty Modelling and Robust Observer Synthesis Using the Koopman Operator,

    S. Dahdah and J. R. Forbes, “Uncertainty Modelling and Robust Observer Synthesis Using the Koopman Operator,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01057, 2024

    2024

  117. [125]

    A Dual Koopman Ap- proach to Observer Design for Nonlinear Systems,

    J. Mohet, A. Mauroy, and J. J. Winkin, “A Dual Koopman Ap- proach to Observer Design for Nonlinear Systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08345, 2025

    2025

  118. [126]

    Koopman-based Feedback Design with Stability Guar- antees,

    R. Str ¨asser, M. Schaller, K. Worthmann, J. Berberich, and F. Allg¨ower, “Koopman-based Feedback Design with Stability Guar- antees,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 355–370, 2025

    2025

  119. [127]

    Data-Driven Model Predictive Control: Asymptotic Stability Despite Approximation Errors Exemplified in the Koopman Framework,

    I. Schimperna, K. Worthmann, M. Schaller, L. Bold, and L. Magni, “Data-Driven Model Predictive Control: Asymptotic Stability Despite Approximation Errors Exemplified in the Koopman Framework,” Automatica, to appear. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05951, 2026

    2026

  120. [128]

    Control based on the Koopman Operator: A Comprehen- sive Review,

    J. F. Dur ´an-Siguenza, L. I. Minchala, L. E. Garza-Casta ˜n´on, and H. Zhang, “Control based on the Koopman Operator: A Comprehen- sive Review,”Journal of the Franklin Institute, p. 108256, 2025

    2025

  121. [129]

    Towards Data-driven LQR with Koopmanizing Flows,

    P. Bevanda, M. Beier, S. Heshmati-Alamdari, S. Sosnowski, and S. Hirche, “Towards Data-driven LQR with Koopmanizing Flows,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, pp. 13–18, 2022

    2022

  122. [130]

    Koopman-based Control of Nonlinear Systems with Closed-Loop Guarantees,

    R. Str ¨asser, J. Berberich, M. Schaller, K. Worthmann, and F. Allg ¨ower, “Koopman-based Control of Nonlinear Systems with Closed-Loop Guarantees,”at-Automatisierungstechnik, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 413–428, 2025

    2025

  123. [131]

    On the Existence of Quadratic Control Lyapunov Functions for Koopman- Operator based Bilinear Systems,

    S. L. N. A. Hanna, N. Hoischen, S. Hirche, and A. Lederer, “On the Existence of Quadratic Control Lyapunov Functions for Koopman- Operator based Bilinear Systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.09267, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Data-Driven Feed- back Linearization using the Koopman Generator,

    D. Gadginmath, V . Krishnan, and F. Pasqualetti, “Data-Driven Feed- back Linearization using the Koopman Generator,”IEEE Transac- tions on Automatic Control, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 8844–8851, 2024

    2024

  125. [133]

    On the Equivalence of Contraction and Koopman Approaches for Nonlinear Stability and Control,

    B. Yi and I. R. Manchester, “On the Equivalence of Contraction and Koopman Approaches for Nonlinear Stability and Control,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 4336–4351, 2023

    2023

  126. [134]

    Kernel-Based Optimal Control: An Infinitesimal Generator Approach,

    P. Bevanda, N. Hoischen, T. Wittmann, J. Br ¨udigam, S. Hirche, and B. Houska, “Kernel-Based Optimal Control: An Infinitesimal Generator Approach,” inProc. Annual Learning for Dynamics & Control Conference, 2025

    2025

  127. [135]

    Data-Driven Stochastic Optimal Control in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces,

    N. Hoischen, P. Bevanda, S. Sosnowski, S. Hirche, and B. Houska, “Data-Driven Stochastic Optimal Control in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16407, 2024

    2024

  128. [136]

    When Koopman Meets Hamilton and Jacobi,

    U. Vaidya, “When Koopman Meets Hamilton and Jacobi,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2025

    2025

  129. [137]

    On the Inherent Robustness of Optimal and Suboptimal Nonlinear MPC,

    D. A. Allan, C. N. Bates, M. J. Risbeck, and J. B. Rawlings, “On the Inherent Robustness of Optimal and Suboptimal Nonlinear MPC,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 106, pp. 68–78, 2017

    2017

  130. [138]

    Data-Driven MPC with Stability Guarantees using Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition,

    L. Bold, L. Gr ¨une, M. Schaller, and K. Worthmann, “Data-Driven MPC with Stability Guarantees using Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 534–541, 2025

    2025

  131. [139]

    Discounted MPC and Infinite-Horizon Optimal Con- trol under Plant-Model Mismatch: Stability and Suboptimality,

    R. H. Moldenhauer, K. Worthmann, R. Postoyan, D. Ne ˇsi´c, and M. Granzotto, “Discounted MPC and Infinite-Horizon Optimal Con- trol under Plant-Model Mismatch: Stability and Suboptimality,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.08521, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Beyond Inherent Robustness: Strong Stability of MPC Despite Plant-Model Mismatch,

    S. J. Kuntz and J. B. Rawlings, “Beyond Inherent Robustness: Strong Stability of MPC Despite Plant-Model Mismatch,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 780–792, 2026

    2026

  133. [141]

    Stability of Data-Driven Koopman MPC with Terminal Conditions,

    I. Schimperna, L. Bold, J. K ¨ohler, K. Worthmann, and L. Magni, “Stability of Data-Driven Koopman MPC with Terminal Conditions,” inProc. European Control Conference, to appear. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21248, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  134. [142]

    On the Infinite Horizon Performance of Receding Horizon Controllers,

    L. Gr ¨une and A. Rantzer, “On the Infinite Horizon Performance of Receding Horizon Controllers,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2100–2111, 2008

    2008

  135. [143]

    Gr ¨une and J

    L. Gr ¨une and J. Pannek,Nonlinear Model Predictive Control. Com- munications and Control Engineering, Cham: Springer Int. Publish- ing, 2017

    2017

  136. [144]

    Relaxing Dynamic Programming,

    B. Lincoln and A. Rantzer, “Relaxing Dynamic Programming,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1249–1260, 2006

    2006

  137. [145]

    Rawlings, D

    J. Rawlings, D. Mayne, and M. Diehl,Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design. Nob Hill Publishing, 2017

    2017

  138. [146]

    Quadratic Costs do not Always Work in MPC,

    M. A. M ¨uller and K. Worthmann, “Quadratic Costs do not Always Work in MPC,”Automatica, vol. 82, pp. 269–277, 2017

    2017

  139. [147]

    Model Predictive Control: For Want of a Local Control Lyapunov Function, All is not Lost,

    G. Grimm, M. J. Messina, S. E. Tuna, and A. R. Teel, “Model Predictive Control: For Want of a Local Control Lyapunov Function, All is not Lost,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 546–558, 2005

    2005

  140. [148]

    Analysis of Unconstrained Nonlinear MPC Schemes with Time Varying Control Horizon,

    L. Gr ¨une, J. Pannek, M. Seehafer, and K. Worthmann, “Analysis of Unconstrained Nonlinear MPC Schemes with Time Varying Control Horizon,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 4938–4962, 2010

    2010

  141. [149]

    Model Predictive Control, Cost Controllability, and Homogeneity,

    J.-M. Coron, L. Gr ¨une, and K. Worthmann, “Model Predictive Control, Cost Controllability, and Homogeneity,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 2979–2996, 2020

    2020

  142. [150]

    Stability and Feasibility of State Constrained MPC without Stabilizing Terminal Constraints,

    A. Boccia, L. Gr ¨une, and K. Worthmann, “Stability and Feasibility of State Constrained MPC without Stabilizing Terminal Constraints,” Systems & control letters, vol. 72, pp. 14–21, 2014

    2014

  143. [151]

    Worthmann,Stability Analysis of Unconstrained Receding Hori- zon Control Schemes

    K. Worthmann,Stability Analysis of Unconstrained Receding Hori- zon Control Schemes. PhD thesis, U Bayreuth, 2011

    2011

  144. [152]

    On the Exponential Stability of Koopman Model Predictive Control,

    X. Shang, J. Cort ´es, and Y . Zheng, “On the Exponential Stability of Koopman Model Predictive Control,” inProc. Annual Learning for Dynamics & Control Conference, 2026

    2026

  145. [153]

    Learning Stable Models for Prediction and Control,

    G. Mamakoukas, I. Abraham, and T. D. Murphey, “Learning Stable Models for Prediction and Control,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2255–2275, 2023

    2023

  146. [154]

    Optimal Construction of Koopman Eigen- functions for Prediction and Control,

    M. Korda and I. Mezi ´c, “Optimal Construction of Koopman Eigen- functions for Prediction and Control,”IEEE Transactions on Auto- matic Control, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 5114–5129, 2020

    2020

  147. [155]

    Koopman NMPC: Koopman- based Learning and Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Control- Affine Systems,

    C. Folkestad and J. W. Burdick, “Koopman NMPC: Koopman- based Learning and Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Control- Affine Systems,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 7350–7356, 2021

    2021

  148. [156]

    Deep Bilinear Koopman Model Predictive Control for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,

    D. Zhao, B. Li, F. Lu, J. She, and S. Yan, “Deep Bilinear Koopman Model Predictive Control for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 16077– 16086, 2024

    2024

  149. [157]

    Learning Koopman Models from Data under General Noise Condi- tions,

    L. C. Iacob, M. Sz ´ecsi, G. I. Beintema, M. Schoukens, and R. T ´oth, “Learning Koopman Models from Data under General Noise Condi- tions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.09646, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Koopman Meets Input-Output Data: Data-Driven Output-Feedback Control of Nonlinear Systems with Closed-Loop Guarantees,

    R. Str ¨asser, J. Berberich, M. Schaller, K. Worthmann, and F. Allg ¨ower, “Koopman Meets Input-Output Data: Data-Driven Output-Feedback Control of Nonlinear Systems with Closed-Loop Guarantees,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.07758, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Exponential Stability of Data-Driven Nonlinear MPC based on Input/Output Models,

    L. Bold, I. Schimperna, K. Worthmann, and J. K ¨ohler, “Exponential Stability of Data-Driven Nonlinear MPC based on Input/Output Models,”IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 10, pp. 511 – 516, 2026

    2026

  152. [160]

    Data-Driven Robust Output Regulation of Continuous- Time LTI Systems using Koopman Operators,

    J. Deutscher, “Data-Driven Robust Output Regulation of Continuous- Time LTI Systems using Koopman Operators,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 8774–8781, 2024

    2024

  153. [161]

    A Koopman-Backstepping Approach to Data-Driven Robust Output Regulation for Linear Parabolic Sys- tems,

    J. Deutscher and J. Zimmer, “A Koopman-Backstepping Approach to Data-Driven Robust Output Regulation for Linear Parabolic Sys- tems,”Automatica, vol. 182, p. 112538, 2025

    2025

  154. [162]

    An Overview of Statistical Learning Theory,

    V . N. Vapnik, “An Overview of Statistical Learning Theory,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 988–999, 1999

    1999

  155. [163]

    Statistical Learning Theory: Models, Concepts, and Results,

    U. V on Luxburg and B. Sch ¨olkopf, “Statistical Learning Theory: Models, Concepts, and Results,” inHandbook of the History of Logic, vol. 10, pp. 651–706, Elsevier, 2011

    2011

  156. [164]

    Learning Dynamical Systems via Koopman Operator Regression in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces,

    V . Kostic, P. Novelli, A. Maurer, C. Ciliberto, L. Rosasco, and M. Pontil, “Learning Dynamical Systems via Koopman Operator Regression in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4017–4031, 2022

    2022

  157. [165]

    On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities,

    V . Vapnik and A. Y . Chervonenkis, “On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities,”Theory of Probability & Its Applications, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 264–280, 1971

    1971

  158. [166]

    Vapnik,The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory

    V . Vapnik,The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  159. [167]

    Rademacher and Gaussian Com- plexities: Risk Bounds and Structural Results,

    P. L. Bartlett and S. Mendelson, “Rademacher and Gaussian Com- plexities: Risk Bounds and Structural Results,”Journal of machine learning research, vol. 3, pp. 463–482, 2002

    2002

  160. [168]

    Sharp Spectral Rates for Koopman Operator Learning,

    V . Kostic, K. Lounici, P. Novelli, and M. Pontil, “Sharp Spectral Rates for Koopman Operator Learning,”Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 32328–32339, 2023

    2023

  161. [169]

    Learning the Infinitesimal Generator of Stochastic Diffusion Pro- cesses,

    V . R. Kostic, K. Lounici, H. Halconruy, T. Devergne, and M. Pontil, “Learning the Infinitesimal Generator of Stochastic Diffusion Pro- cesses,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 137806–137846, 2024

    2024

  162. [170]

    Probabilistic Machine Learning and Artificial Intel- ligence,

    Z. Ghahramani, “Probabilistic Machine Learning and Artificial Intel- ligence,”Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 452–459, 2015

    2015

  163. [171]

    Gaussian processes for Big Data,

    J. Hensman, N. Fusi, and N. D. Lawrence, “Gaussian processes for Big Data,” inProc. Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 282–290, 2013

    2013

  164. [172]

    When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPs,

    H. Liu, Y .-S. Ong, X. Shen, and J. Cai, “When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPs,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 4405– 4423, 2020

    2020

  165. [173]

    Gpytorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Acceleration,

    J. Gardner, G. Pleiss, K. Q. Weinberger, D. Bindel, and A. G. Wilson, “Gpytorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Acceleration,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31, 2018

    2018

  166. [174]

    SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, et al., “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,”Nature methods, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 261–272, 2020

    2020

  167. [175]

    Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (GPML) Toolbox,

    C. E. Rasmussen and H. Nickisch, “Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (GPML) Toolbox,”The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 11, pp. 3011–3015, 2010

    2010

  168. [176]

    Gaussian Process-based Real-Time Learning for Safety Critical Applications,

    A. Lederer, A. J. O. Conejo, K. A. Maier, W. Xiao, J. Umlauft, and S. Hirche, “Gaussian Process-based Real-Time Learning for Safety Critical Applications,” inProc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 6055–6064, 2021

    2021

  169. [177]

    Information-Theoretic Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Opti- mization in the Bandit Setting,

    N. Srinivas, A. Krause, S. M. Kakade, and M. W. Seeger, “Information-Theoretic Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Opti- mization in the Bandit Setting,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 3250–3265, 2012

    2012

  170. [178]

    On Kernelized Multi-Armed Bandits,

    S. R. Chowdhury and A. Gopalan, “On Kernelized Multi-Armed Bandits,” inProc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 844–853, 2017

    2017

  171. [179]

    Uniform Error Bounds for Gaussian Process Regression with Application to Safe Control,

    A. Lederer, J. Umlauft, and S. Hirche, “Uniform Error Bounds for Gaussian Process Regression with Application to Safe Control,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019

    2019

  172. [180]

    Practical and Rigorous Uncertainty Bounds for Gaussian Process Regression,

    C. Fiedler, C. W. Scherer, and S. Trimpe, “Practical and Rigorous Uncertainty Bounds for Gaussian Process Regression,” inProc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 7439–7447, 2021

    2021

  173. [181]

    The Power and Limits of Deep Learning: In his IRI Medal address, Yann LeCun maps the development of machine learning techniques and suggests what the future may hold.,

    Y . LeCun, “The Power and Limits of Deep Learning: In his IRI Medal address, Yann LeCun maps the development of machine learning techniques and suggests what the future may hold.,”Research- Technology Management, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 22–27, 2018

    2018

  174. [182]

    Generative Adversarial Nets,

    I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y . Bengio, “Generative Adversarial Nets,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2672– 2680, 2014

    2014

  175. [183]

    Flow Matching for Generative Modeling,

    Y . Lipman, R. T. Q. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le, “Flow Matching for Generative Modeling,” inInt. Conf. Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  176. [184]

    Learning Deep Neural Network Representations for Koopman Operators of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,

    E. Yeung, S. Kundu, and N. Hodas, “Learning Deep Neural Network Representations for Koopman Operators of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,” inProc. American Control Conference, pp. 4832–4839, 2019

    2019

  177. [185]

    Linearly Recurrent Autoencoder Net- works for Learning Dynamics,

    S. E. Otto and C. W. Rowley, “Linearly Recurrent Autoencoder Net- works for Learning Dynamics,”SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 558–593, 2019

    2019

  178. [186]

    A Path Towards Autonomous Machine Intelligence Version 0.9. 2, 2022-06-27,

    Y . LeCun, “A Path Towards Autonomous Machine Intelligence Version 0.9. 2, 2022-06-27,”Open Review, pp. 1–62, 2022

    2022

  179. [187]

    Koopman Invariants as Drivers of Emergent Time-Series Clustering in Joint- Embedding Predictive Architectures,

    P. Ruiz-Morales, D. Vanoost, D. Pissoort, and M. Verbeke, “Koopman Invariants as Drivers of Emergent Time-Series Clustering in Joint- Embedding Predictive Architectures,” inProc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 25176–25183, 2026

    2026

  180. [188]

    A Survey of Deep Learning and Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting,

    J. A. Miller, M. Aldosari, F. Saeed, N. H. Barna, S. Rana, I. B. Arpinar, and N. Liu, “A Survey of Deep Learning and Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13912, 2024

    2024

  181. [189]

    Activity in Perceptual Classification Networks as a Basis for Human Subjective Time Perception,

    W. Roseboom, Z. Fountas, K. Nikiforou, D. Bhowmik, M. Shanahan, and A. K. Seth, “Activity in Perceptual Classification Networks as a Basis for Human Subjective Time Perception,”Nature Communica- tions, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2019

    2019

  182. [190]

    Applied Koopmanism,

    M. Budisi ´c, R. Mohr, and I. Mezi ´c, “Applied Koopmanism,”Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 047510, 2012

    2012

  183. [191]

    One- Step Offline Distillation of Diffusion-Based Models via Koopman Modeling,

    N. Berman, I. Naiman, M. Eliasof, H. Zisling, and O. Azencot, “One- Step Offline Distillation of Diffusion-Based Models via Koopman Modeling,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025

    2025

  184. [192]

    Hierarchical Koopman Diffusion: Fast Generation with Interpretable Diffusion Trajectory,

    H. Bai, W. Ding, and D. Zou, “Hierarchical Koopman Diffusion: Fast Generation with Interpretable Diffusion Trajectory,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 38, pp. 87345–87379, 2026

    2026

  185. [193]

    Unfolding Generative Flows with Koop- man Operators: Fast and Interpretable Sampling,

    E. Turan, A. Siozopoulos, L. Martinez, J. Gaubil, E. Pierson, and M. Ovsjanikov, “Unfolding Generative Flows with Koop- man Operators: Fast and Interpretable Sampling,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22304, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  186. [194]

    Dynamic Neural Koopman Distillation for Real-Time Robot Control Using Diffusion Models,

    L. Zheng, P. Yu, Z. Peng, C. Liu, and A. Lederer, “Dynamic Neural Koopman Distillation for Real-Time Robot Control Using Diffusion Models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.24924, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  187. [195]

    The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks,

    J. Frankle and M. Carbin, “The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks,” inProc. Int. Conf. Learning Representations, 2019

    2019

  188. [196]

    An Operator Theoretic View on Pruning Deep Neural Networks,

    W. T. Redman, M. Fonoberova, R. Mohr, I. G. Kevrekidis, and I. Mezi ´c, “An Operator Theoretic View on Pruning Deep Neural Networks,” inProc. Int. Conf. Learning Representations, 2022

    2022

  189. [197]

    Identifying Equivalent Training Dy- namics,

    W. T. Redman, J. M. Bello-Rivas, M. Fonoberova, R. Mohr, I. G. Kevrekidis, and I. Mezi ´c, “Identifying Equivalent Training Dy- namics,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 23603–23629, 2024

    2024

  190. [198]

    Koopman-Assisted Reinforcement Learning,

    P. Rozwood, E. Mehrez, L. Paehler, W. Sun, and S. Brunton, “Koopman-Assisted Reinforcement Learning,” inNeurIPS 2023 AI for Science Workshop, 2023

    2023

  191. [199]

    Koopman Q-Learning: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Symmetries of Dynamics,

    M. Weissenbacher, S. Sinha, A. Garg, and Y . Kawahara, “Koopman Q-Learning: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Symmetries of Dynamics,” inProc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 23645–23667, 2022

    2022

  192. [200]

    Koopman Constrained Policy Optimization: A Koopman Operator Theoretic Method for Differentiable Optimal Control in Robotics,

    M. Retchin, B. Amos, S. L. Brunton, and S. Song, “Koopman Constrained Policy Optimization: A Koopman Operator Theoretic Method for Differentiable Optimal Control in Robotics,” inICML 2023 Workshop on Differentiable Almost Everything, 2023

    2023

  193. [201]

    Koopman Operator-based Knowledge- Guided Reinforcement Learning for Safe Human–Robot Interaction,

    A. Sinha and Y . Wang, “Koopman Operator-based Knowledge- Guided Reinforcement Learning for Safe Human–Robot Interaction,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 9, p. 779194, 2022

    2022

  194. [202]

    Powerful but Limited: A DARPA Perspective on AI,

    A. Prabhakar, “Powerful but Limited: A DARPA Perspective on AI,” inProc. DARPA, 2017

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed July 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.