Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

A large-volume cosmological simulation, postprocessed without tuning dust or birth-cloud attenuation, reproduces the low-redshift Universe's far-ultraviolet to far-infrared cosmic spectral energy distribution.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 00:45 UTC pith:QXKFFMZ2

load-bearing objection A genuinely new, honestly written methods paper: COLIBRE-SKIRT matches the low-redshift CSED without dust postprocessing calibration, but the headline claim that no birth-cloud attenuation is needed is under-tested. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14901 v1 pith:QXKFFMZ2 submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.GA

The COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline: Calibration-free dust radiative transfer postprocessing for cosmological simulations

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dust radiative transfercosmological simulationscosmic spectral energy distributiondust attenuationmultiphase ISMgrain size distributionscalibration-free postprocessingCOLIBRE simulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a postprocessing pipeline that turns the COLIBRE suite of large-volume cosmological simulations into synthetic galaxy spectra from the far-ultraviolet to the far-infrared, then claims that, for the first time, such a simulation matches the observed low-redshift cosmic spectral energy distribution (CSED) without calibrating the dust postprocessing beforehand. The load-bearing result is that with COLIBRE's live dust model and resolved multiphase ISM, the computed CSED of 47,219 galaxies agrees with GAMA and HerMES data within about 0.2 dex over 0.15–500 μm, with a residual mid-infrared overproduction near 0.23 dex. If correct, mock observables from large-volume simulations no longer need a tuned dust-to-metal ratio or a subgrid birth-cloud absorption model, which strengthens the predictive power of forward modelling. The pipeline is meant as a reference framework that can be applied to other COLIBRE boxes and redshifts.

Core claim

The central claim is that the COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline produces a z ≤ 0.1 cosmic spectral energy distribution consistent with observed GAMA and HerMES data within ≲0.2 dex across the FUV–FIR range, with no calibration of the postprocessing: dust masses and species come directly from the simulation, and no subgrid birth-cloud attenuation is added. The residual MIR tension (up to ~0.23 dex in IRAC 8.0) is attributed to insufficient heating of the hottest dust and uncertainty in PAH-emission modelling. The authors argue that the resolved multiphase ISM in COLIBRE provides enough diffuse attenuation to replace the subgrid birth-cloud treatment that earlier large-volume simulation pipelines require

What carries the argument

The 'split & scale' technique: starting from any adopted dust model (in the paper's fiducial choice, a Milky-Way-calibrated model), the grain-size distribution is cut at a=0.03 μm and each segment is scaled to match the per-particle dust masses in four species (small/large, carbonaceous/silicate) predicted by COLIBRE. This converts the simulated two-size dust into the continuous size distributions needed for radiative transfer without adding free parameters and preserves PAH-producing small carbonaceous grains. The second pillar is COLIBRE's direct modelling of the cold multiphase ISM, which produces clumpier, higher-density dust around star-forming regions; the paper attributes the observed

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the assumption that COLIBRE's resolved multiphase ISM—which does not resolve molecular-cloud interiors and uses a clumping factor to boost dust-processing rates—produces a dust–star geometry whose diffuse attenuation replaces the subgrid birth-cloud attenuation used by earlier pipelines; the paper itself notes in Section 4.2 that more testing is required to know whether a subgrid model is necessary.

What would settle it

Re-run the fiducial pipeline on a thousand-galaxy subsample with the clumping factor set to 1 and with young stellar smoothing lengths set to ~1 pc instead of ~1 kpc, then check the GALEX FUV and MIPS 24 fluxes: if the UV match is a coincidence of boosted dust density or diffuse smoothing, those fluxes will shift by more than the claimed 0.2 dex tolerance. A second independent check is to measure the IRX–β relation of the simulated star-forming galaxies against observed samples, which isolates attenuation geometry.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Mock SEDs, luminosities, and images from large-volume simulations can be produced without tuning dust-to-metal ratio or birth-cloud attenuation, making observational predictions more direct tests of the simulation physics.
  • The 'split & scale' method can be reused with any dust model and any simulation that tracks multiple dust species/sizes, removing a key free-parameter step from dust radiative transfer postprocessing.
  • The pipeline is applicable across redshifts with modifications (scaling the grid box, enabling dust self-absorption and CMB heating at high z), opening the way to synthetic spectra and images from z=0 to reionization.
  • The residual MIR excess localizes the remaining uncertainty to PAH and very-small-grain modeling and to heating of the hottest dust, indicating where dust-model improvements would most affect predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the resolved multiphase ISM really replaces birth-cloud attenuation, then subgrid dust recipes in other large-volume simulations may be compensating for a missing cold gas phase rather than for genuine physics; testing one of those simulations with an added cold ISM would isolate the mechanism.
  • Beyond the paper: the 'split & scale' rule effectively gives every gas particle its own extinction curve and emissivity; a testable extension is to compare predicted spatially resolved attenuation maps or environment-dependent attenuation curves against nearby-galaxy observations, which are more constraining than the integrated CSED.
  • Beyond the paper: the underpredicted MIPS 24 and PACS fluxes together with the overpredicted IRAC 8.0 could be a single signature of young stellar light spread over ~1 kpc; if the 'no smoothing' variant (compact emission regions) improves the fit, then unresolved star-cluster scale structure, not dust abundance, is the limiting ingredient, a prediction higher-resolution COLIBRE runs could confirm.
  • Beyond the paper: the paper's evidence is a single integrated statistic; the natural next test is the redshift evolution of the CSED at z ≳ 1, where birth-cloud absorption is expected to matter more and where the pipeline currently neglects nebular continuum and AGN.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents the COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline, a dust radiative transfer postprocessing framework for the COLIBRE large-volume cosmological simulations, which include a live dust model and a resolved multiphase ISM. The central methodological innovation is a 'split & scale' mapping that converts COLIBRE's two-size, three-species dust masses into continuous grain size distributions for SKIRT without introducing fitted parameters. The pipeline deliberately omits subgrid birth-cloud dust attenuation, using dust-free TODDLERS templates for star-forming regions, and instead relies on the resolved dusty ISM to attenuate UV light. As a first application, the authors compute the z<=0.1 cosmic SED from 47,219 galaxies in the L100m6 box (M*>=1e8.5 Msun), compare it to GAMA and HerMES observations, and report agreement within about 0.2 dex over most of 0.15-500 um, with a mid-infrared overproduction peaking near 0.23 dex in IRAC 8.0. The paper also documents extensive tests: resolution and box-size convergence, numerical grid/photon-packet convergence, dust-model variations, young-stellar-population treatments, and aperture choices.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a meaningful advance: a large-volume cosmological simulation would, for the first time, reproduce the local cosmic SED without a tuned dust-to-metal ratio or an ad hoc birth-cloud attenuation prescription in postprocessing. The paper is also valuable as a reference pipeline: the code is public, the numerical choices are tested in unusual detail (Appendices B, D, E), the resolution and box-size convergence are explicitly quantified (Section 5.1 and Appendix A), and the residual MIR tension is disclosed rather than hidden. The 'split & scale' approach is a useful, parameter-free bridge between the discrete dust species tracked by the simulation and the continuous grain size distributions needed for dust emission modelling. The main weakness is that the paper's strongest interpretive claim—that the resolved multiphase ISM renders subgrid birth-cloud attenuation unnecessary—is asserted more strongly than it is demonstrated; Section 4.2 explicitly calls for more testing, and the CSED comparison is sensitive to numerical choices such as the adopted smoothing of young stellar emission and the 30-kpc aperture.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2 and Fig. 6] The central claim that COLIBRE's resolved multiphase ISM reproduces the effect of birth-cloud dust attenuation is not yet demonstrated. Section 3.3.1 attributes the UV match to 'higher dust densities around the sites of star formation', but Section 4.2 concedes that 'more extensive testing is required to assess whether a subgrid model for dust attenuation is necessary in COLIBRE'. This matters because Fig. 6 shows that the UV and MIR CSED change by roughly 0.1-0.2 dex when young stellar sources are either used directly ('No resampling') or collapsed to point-like smoothing lengths ('No smoothing'). Since the fiducial ~1 kpc smoothing of star-forming gas is a numerical choice, the agreement with GAMA could be a consequence of that choice rather than a robust property of the resolved ISM. A concrete test would be to recompute the FUV CSED across a range of smoothing scales (e.g. 10 pc to 2
  2. [Section 4.1, Fig. 3, Table 3] The 'calibration-free' claim is stronger than what the evidence supports because the fiducial dust model was selected, in part, using the same observational data used for validation. The DL07 model is adopted after showing that THEMIS produces substantially worse agreement with GAMA/HerMES (Fig. 3), with the additional justification that DL07's species fractions are closer to COLIBRE's (Table 3). The latter is a physical consistency argument, but the former is data-informed model selection. I recommend either (i) stating explicitly that the dust model was chosen independently of the target CSED data and reporting the selection criterion a priori, or (ii) softening the abstract and Section 6 wording from 'calibration-free' to 'free of fitted postprocessing parameters'.
  3. [Section 3.2, Appendix C, Fig. C.1] The aperture dependence of the UV CSED is a non-negligible systematic for the central validation. Adopting a 3*R_star,1/2 aperture instead of the fiducial 30 kpc lowers the GALEX FUV flux by about 24% (0.115 dex), and the paper notes that 3*R_star,1/2 better matches the GAMA LAMBDAR apertures. The quoted 'within 0.2 dex' agreement is therefore partly dependent on an aperture choice that overestimates the UV relative to the observed measurement. The authors discuss this and note partial cancellation with the ~12% sample-completeness correction, but the residual comparison in Fig. 1 does not include these systematics. Please quantify the combined aperture+completeness uncertainty on the FUV residual, or adopt the matched aperture for the fiducial comparison.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.1] The paragraph beginning 'For COLIBRE, we use our main galaxy sample...' is repeated verbatim in the text, immediately after the same paragraph. This is a clear editorial duplication.
  2. [Table 1 footnote] The footnote reads '123 490 galaxies at z=0 and 23 729 galaxies at z=0.1'. This appears to contain a typo: the main sample is stated as 23,490 galaxies at z=0 in Section 2.2.1. Please correct.
  3. [Section 2.4.3] The TODDLERS cloud density (320 cm^-3) and star-formation efficiency (2.5%) are taken from Kapoor et al. (2024), who calibrated them against DustPedia. The paper claims these affect only nebular emission lines and hence are not important here. Given the paper's emphasis on being 'calibration-free', this external calibration of template parameters should be acknowledged in the definition of 'calibration-free' in Section 1, even if the impact on the CSED continuum is negligible.
  4. [Section 3.2 and Fig. 1] The observed GAMA and HerMES CSEDs differ by 0.29 dex at 24 um, as noted in the text. The residual comparison in Fig. 1 does not display the observational uncertainty or this cross-dataset inconsistency. Adding shaded uncertainty bands or making the 24 um systematic explicit would strengthen the 'within 0.2 dex' claim.
  5. [Abstract/Results] The abstract says agreement within about 0.2 dex, while the maximum residual quoted in Section 3.3.3 is 0.23 dex in IRAC 8.0. Please harmonize the wording, e.g. 'within roughly 0.2 dex, with a maximum MIR residual of 0.23 dex'.
  6. [Equation 4] In the log-normal grain size distribution, the notation a0 is introduced as the centroid but the normalization constant is not specified. Since the distribution is used to set absolute dust masses in SKIRT, please state explicitly how it is normalized.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the CSED comparison is an external benchmark and no postprocessing parameter is fitted to the target data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: COLIBRE's live dust model supplies per-particle dust masses, species fractions, and a resolved multiphase ISM; SKIRT performs dust radiative transfer; the resulting SEDs are summed into a CSED and compared with GAMA/HerMES. No free parameter is adjusted to the observed CSED. The 'split & scale' grain-size mapping is parameter-free: the split at 0.03 micron is taken from Hirashita (2015) and the geometric mean of the two COLIBRE grain sizes, rather than from the target data. The fiducial DL07 dust model is primarily motivated by the internal match between DL07 species fractions and COLIBRE's predicted dust composition (Table 3), not by fitting the CSED. Although the paper notes that THEMIS 'significantly worsens the agreement' with observations when reporting why it is not adopted, this is a discrete model-selection consideration and does not constitute a parameter fit or a reduction of the prediction to its input. The main caveat is explicitly acknowledged in Section 4.2: 'more extensive testing is required to assess whether a subgrid model for dust attenuation is necessary in COLIBRE.' This is an untested physical assumption behind the 'calibration-free' UV match, but it is a robustness/correctness concern, not a circular step: the paper does not use the target data to define the resolved attenuation mechanism, and the central CSED comparison remains an external, independently measured benchmark. Self-citations to COLIBRE, SKIRT, and prior SKIRT postprocessing work are normal and provide independent simulation/code evidence; they do not smuggle in the matched CSED. Aperture sensitivity (Appendix C) and smoothing choices affect the comparison but are presented as tests, not as calibration. Therefore the derivation is not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on literature-calibrated dust/stellar models and the COLIBRE simulation's internal dust predictions. The only new hand-chosen constant in the pipeline itself is the 0.03 μm split, which is justified but not independently validated. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • split grain size a_split = 0.03 μm = 0.03 μm
    Hand-chosen threshold in the split & scale mapping separating small and large grains. Justified as the Hirashita (2015) boundary and close to the geometric mean of the COLIBRE sizes (0.0316 μm); not fitted to the CSED, but affects grain size distributions and resulting optical properties.
  • TODDLERS cloud density and star formation efficiency = n=320 cm^-3, SFE=2.5%
    Adopted from Kapoor et al. (2024), who calibrated them against DustPedia observations. The paper states they affect only nebular emission lines, not the continuum CSED, so they are not load-bearing for the central claim but are inherited calibrated numbers.
  • DL07 small-carbonaceous component fractions = 19.46% graphite1, 20.17% graphite2, 30.19% neutral PAH, 30.19% ionized PAH
    Derived from DL07 to preserve relative contributions to small carbonaceous dust; not fitted to the CSED, but a modeling choice for assigning COLIBRE's small carbonaceous mass to DL07 components.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The DL07 dust model, calibrated to Milky Way extinction/emission, provides valid optical and calorimetric properties for COLIBRE grains at z~0.
    Section 2.4.4 and §4.1 choose DL07 over THEMIS partly because its species fractions better match COLIBRE; its physical applicability to other galaxies is untested.
  • domain assumption COLIBRE's live dust model reliably predicts per-particle dust masses and species fractions.
    Taken from the self-cited Trayford et al. (2026); the simulation itself is calibrated to the z=0 stellar mass function and size-mass relation (Chaikin et al. 2026a), per footnote 4.
  • domain assumption The resolved multiphase ISM in COLIBRE replaces subgrid birth-cloud dust attenuation.
    Sections 2.4.3 and 3.3.1; authors later concede in §4.2 that more testing is required.
  • ad hoc to paper Splitting the DL07 size distributions at 0.03 μm and scaling by COLIBRE species masses preserves the essential dust attenuation and emission properties.
    This is the core assumption of the new 'split & scale' method; no independent validation beyond the integrated CSED comparison.
  • domain assumption BPASS v2.2.1 and the dust-free TODDLERS templates accurately represent evolved and young stellar population emission.
    Literature templates, chosen for consistency with COLIBRE's feedback model; differences with Bruzual & Charlot are tested in Appendix B.2.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 53249 in / 15324 out tokens · 137449 ms · 2026-08-02T00:45:09.341670+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Context. Three-dimensional dust radiative transfer provides a powerful framework to connect cosmological galaxy simulations to multiwavelength observations. Until recently, in large-volume simulations, the formation of a cold ISM phase was prevented and dust was not evolved self-consistently. This required calibration of dust-to-metal ratios and extra subgrid dust attenuation in birth clouds, thereby reducing the predictive power. Aims. We present the COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline, a calibration-free dust radiative transfer framework for the novel COLIBRE suite of large-volume cosmological simulations, which include a live dust model and directly simulate the multiphase ISM. Our primary aim is to establish a reference pipeline for generating multiwavelength mock observables from these simulations. As a first application, we produce far-ultraviolet (FUV) to far-infrared (FIR) spatially integrated spectra and assess them by comparison with the observed low-redshift cosmic spectral energy distribution (CSED). Methods. We apply the SKIRT dust radiative transfer code to the COLIBRE simulations. Dust masses and species fractions are taken directly from the simulation, and no birth cloud model is added in postprocessing. We introduce a "split & scale" approach that maps the simulated two-size, multi-species dust distribution onto continuous grain size distributions without introducing free parameters. Results. We find that, for the first time, a large-volume cosmological simulation directly reproduces the local Universe CSED without calibrating the postprocessing routine a priori. Residual tensions in the mid-infrared (~0.2 dex) point towards insufficient heating of the hottest dust components and uncertainties in the modelling of the PAH-emission carriers. This framework can be readily applied at low and high redshift to create synthetic spectra and images from the FUV to the FIR.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14901 by Alejandro Ben\'itez-Llambay, Alexander J. Richings, Anand Utsav Kapoor, Andrea Gebek, Anna Durrant, Aswin P. Vijayan, Carlos S. Frenk, Cedric G. Lacey, Connor Bottrell, Evgenii Chaikin, Filip Hu\v{s}ko, James W. Trayford, Joop Schaye, Maarten Baes, Matthieu Schaller, Nick Andreadis, Peter Camps, Shengdong Lu, Sylvia Ploeckinger.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The rest-frame cosmic SED of the COLIBRE L100m6 box averaged over the z = 0 and z = 0.1 snapshots, obtained with our fiducial SKIRT setup (solid blue line) and without dust medium in SKIRT (i.e. without dust radiative transfer, dashed blue line). In addition to these CSEDs at the native SKIRT resolution in our setup (R ≈ 100), we also show the filter-convolved COLIBRE CSED as blue markers. The agreement wi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The COLIBRE L200m6 redshift-zero CSED, varying the treatment of the dust grain size distribution. The fiducial model is shown in black, where the original DL07 size distributions are split at a = 0.03 µm and the four dust components (small silicates, large silicates, small carbonaceous grains, and large carbonaceous grains) are scaled depending on the COLIBRE grain species abundances. For the ‘Unmodified D… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dust grain size distributions of the two dust models considered. The left column shows the dust model from DL07, the right column shows the THEMIS dust model (Jones et al. 2017). The grain size distributions (defined as 4 3 πa 3 dn(a)/d log10(a)) of the original dust models are shown in the upper panels. Arrows indicate the intrinsic COLIBRE dust grain sizes (Trayford et al. 2026). In the lower panels, we … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Optical properties of the two dust models considered. The left column shows the dust model from DL07, the right column shows the THEMIS dust model (Jones et al. 2017). The upper panels indicate the dust mass extinction coefficients of each individual component for the original dust models. Similarly, the emissivities of the dust model components when exposed to a Mathis et al. (1983) interstellar radiation… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The CSED at z = 0 for different COLIBRE resolution levels, using the L025m5, L025m6, and L025m7 simulations. We use our fiducial COLIBRE-SKIRT pipeline here, postprocessing all galaxies with M⋆ ≥ 107 M⊙ for this resolution test. The CSEDs are converged to within ±0.1 dex, with the biggest differences arising in the FIR. Box ε⋆ [M⊙Mpc−3 ] εdust [M⊙Mpc−3 ] εSFR [M⊙Mpc−3 yr−1 ] Ngal (M⋆ ≥ 107 M⊙) Ngal (M⋆ ≥ 1… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Broadband fluxes in various bands as a function of stellar mass, for the COLIBRE 25-Mpc simulations at z = 0. We postprocess all galaxies with M⋆ ≥ 107 M⊙ for this resolution test. Lines indicate running medians in bins of stellar mass (with bin widths of 0.225 dex. Galaxies with low specific dust masses (Mdust/M⋆ ≤ 10−5 ) are indicated by star symbols. We find good convergence over the entire FUV-FIR wave… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The evolution of galaxy dust scaling relations in the COLIBRE simulations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    The COLIBRE simulations reproduce the broad evolution of galaxy dust scaling relations from z=15 to 0, but overproduce the z<1 cosmic dust mass density and miss the most extreme sub-millimeter galaxies.

  2. Cosmological simulations of the high-redshift galaxy population adopting a variable stellar initial mass function

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A density-dependent top-heavy stellar IMF brightens z=10-15 galaxies by ~1-1.3 mag in the UV, easing the JWST bright-galaxy tension; extra dust from the massive stars offsets much of the boost by z=5.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

276 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    The many colours of the TNG100 simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1377 , archivePrefix =. 2405.04925 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    A simple model to interpret the ultraviolet, optical and infrared emission from galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13535.x , archivePrefix =. 0806.1020 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    The size distribution of interstellar grains. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/155591 , adsurl =

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Accurate photometric redshifts for the CFHT legacy survey calibrated using the VIMOS VLT deep survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065138 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0603217 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Measuring and modelling the redshift evolution of clustering: the Hubble Deep Field North. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02978.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9902290 , primaryClass =

  6. [7]

    , keywords =

    The Herschel ATLAS. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/653086 , archivePrefix =. 0910.4279 , primaryClass =

  7. [8]

    , keywords =

    GAMA/G10-COSMOS/3D-HST: the 0 < z < 5 cosmic star formation history, stellar-mass, and dust-mass densities. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2728 , archivePrefix =. 1710.06628 , primaryClass =

  8. [9]

    , keywords =

    Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Panchromatic Data Release (far-UV-far-IR) and the low-z energy budget. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2505 , archivePrefix =. 1508.02076 , primaryClass =

  9. [10]

    , keywords =

    Synergising semi-analytical models and hydrodynamical simulations to interpret JWST data from the first billion years. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554042 , archivePrefix =. 2502.02647 , primaryClass =

  10. [11]

    , keywords =

    Stellar lifetimes and abundance ratios in chemical evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/157039 , adsurl =

  11. [12]

    , keywords =

    The Epochs of Early-Type Galaxy Formation as a Function of Environment. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/426932 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410209 , primaryClass =

  12. [14]

    Scaled-solar and -enhanced models

    Evolutionary stellar population synthesis with MILES - II. Scaled-solar and -enhanced models. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv151 , archivePrefix =. 1504.08032 , primaryClass =

  13. [15]

    , keywords =

    sMILES: a library of semi-empirical MILES stellar spectra with variable [ /Fe] abundances. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1001 , archivePrefix =. 2104.04822 , primaryClass =

  14. [16]

    , keywords =

    sMILES SSPs: a library of semi-empirical MILES stellar population models with variable [ /Fe] abundances. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1647 , archivePrefix =. 2306.05942 , primaryClass =

  15. [17]

    , keywords =

    The impact of nebular emission on the ages of z 6 galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911781 , archivePrefix =. 0905.0866 , primaryClass =

  16. [18]

    , keywords =

    Nebular dominated galaxies: insights into the stellar initial mass function at high redshift. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1547 , archivePrefix =. 2311.02051 , primaryClass =

  17. [19]

    , keywords =

    S \'I GAME v3: Gas Fragmentation in Postprocessing of Cosmological Simulations for More Accurate Infrared Line Emission Modeling. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac20d4 , archivePrefix =. 2102.02868 , primaryClass =

  18. [20]

    Diagnosing the interstellar medium of galaxies with far-infrared emission lines. I. The [C II] 158 m line at z 0. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038207 , archivePrefix =. 2011.13441 , primaryClass =

  19. [21]

    Diagnosing the interstellar medium of galaxies with far-infrared emission lines. II. [C II], [O I], [O III], [N II], and [N III] up to z = 6. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243358 , archivePrefix =. 2205.11955 , primaryClass =

  20. [22]

    , keywords =

    The BPT Diagram in Cosmological Galaxy Formation Simulations: Understanding the Physics Driving Offsets at High Redshift. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac43b8 , archivePrefix =. 2201.03564 , primaryClass =

  21. [23]

    , keywords =

    Emission-line properties of IllustrisTNG galaxies: from local diagnostic diagrams to high-redshift predictions for JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2955 , archivePrefix =. 2212.02522 , primaryClass =

  22. [25]

    , keywords =

    Low-Resolution Spectral Templates for Active Galactic Nuclei and Galaxies from 0.03 to 30 m. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/970 , archivePrefix =. 0909.3849 , primaryClass =

  23. [26]

    , keywords =

    Dusty Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei: Reconciling Observations with Models. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa6838 , archivePrefix =. 1703.07781 , primaryClass =

  24. [27]

    AGN Dusty Tori. I. Handling of Clumpy Media. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/590482 , archivePrefix =. 0806.0511 , primaryClass =

  25. [28]

    AGN Dusty Tori. II. Observational Implications of Clumpiness. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/590483 , archivePrefix =. 0806.0512 , primaryClass =

  26. [29]

    , keywords =

    The spectral energy distributions of active galactic nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2324 , archivePrefix =. 1908.03720 , primaryClass =

  27. [30]

    , keywords =

    Spectral Energy Distributions and Multiwavelength Selection of Type 1 Quasars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/506525 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0601558 , primaryClass =

  28. [31]

    , keywords =

    Atlas of Quasar Energy Distributions. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/192093 , adsurl =

  29. [32]

    SED library for observers

    Self-consistent two-phase AGN torus models . SED library for observers. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526034 , archivePrefix =. 1508.04343 , primaryClass =

  30. [33]

    Optical, UV, and X-ray emission properties of unobscured Swift/BAT active galactic nuclei

    BASS: XLIII. Optical, UV, and X-ray emission properties of unobscured Swift/BAT active galactic nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450567 , archivePrefix =. 2409.12239 , primaryClass =

  31. [34]

    , keywords =

    Unified models for active galactic nuclei and quasars. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353 , adsurl =

  32. [35]

    , keywords =

    Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/133630 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9506063 , primaryClass =

  33. [36]

    , keywords =

    Nuclear activity versus star formation: emission-line diagnostics at ultraviolet and optical wavelengths. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2794 , archivePrefix =. 1511.08217 , primaryClass =

  34. [37]

    , keywords =

    The luminosity of cluster galaxies in the Cluster-EAGLE simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1481 , archivePrefix =. 2205.13553 , primaryClass =

  35. [38]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    CALIMA: On-the-fly dust and PAH evolution for radiation-hydrodynamics galaxy formation simulations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.21790 , archivePrefix =. 2602.21790 , primaryClass =

  36. [39]

    , keywords =

    pySTARBURST99: The Next Generation of STARBURST99. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adddb6 , archivePrefix =. 2505.24841 , primaryClass =

  37. [40]

    , keywords =

    Dust evolution with MUPPI in cosmological volumes. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1913 , archivePrefix =. 2204.11884 , primaryClass =

  38. [41]

    , keywords =

    Realistic synthetic integral field spectroscopy with RealSim-IFS. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1532 , archivePrefix =. 2205.15335 , primaryClass =

  39. [42]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    ERGO-ML: The assembly histories of HSC galaxy images via invertible neural networks, contrastive learning, and cosmological simulations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.19148 , archivePrefix =. 2601.19148 , primaryClass =

  40. [43]

    , keywords =

    Simulating the dust content of galaxies: successes and failures. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx467 , archivePrefix =. 1606.02714 , primaryClass =

  41. [45]

    , keywords =

    A hybrid active galactic nucleus feedback model with spinning black holes, winds and jets. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag324 , archivePrefix =. 2509.05179 , primaryClass =

  42. [46]

    , keywords =

    Panchromatic spectral energy distributions of simulated galaxies: results at redshift z = 0. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx869 , archivePrefix =. 1610.09843 , primaryClass =

  43. [47]

    , keywords =

    The early phases of galaxy clusters formation in IR: coupling hydrodynamical simulations with GRASIL-3D. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv676 , archivePrefix =. 1412.6105 , primaryClass =

  44. [48]

    , keywords =

    Modeling the Effects of Dust on Galactic Spectral Energy Distributions from the Ultraviolet to the Millimeter Band. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/306476 , adsurl =

  45. [49]

    The Infrared Side of Galaxy Formation. I. The Local Universe in the Semianalytical Framework. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/317032 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0001308 , primaryClass =

  46. [50]

    , year = 2015, month = aug, volume =

    Molecular Clouds in the Milky Way. , year = 2015, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122324 , adsurl =

  47. [51]

    , keywords =

    Young Massive Star Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130834 , archivePrefix =. 1002.1961 , primaryClass =

  48. [52]

    , keywords =

    Array programming with NumPy. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , archivePrefix =. 2006.10256 , primaryClass =

  49. [53]

    , keywords =

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , archivePrefix =. 1307.6212 , primaryClass =

  50. [54]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

  51. [55]

    Computing in Science and Engineering , keywords =

    Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science and Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , adsurl =

  52. [57]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =

    CMasher: Scientific colormaps for making accessible, informative and 'cmashing' plots. The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =. doi:10.21105/joss.02004 , archivePrefix =. 2003.01069 , primaryClass =

  53. [58]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

  54. [59]

    , year = 2026, month = apr, doi =

    The evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function and star formation rates in the COLIBRE simulations from redshift 17 to 0. , year = 2026, month = apr, doi =

  55. [60]

    , keywords =

    Predictions for the spatial distribution of the dust continuum emission in 1 < z < 5 star-forming galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1736 , archivePrefix =. 1905.13234 , primaryClass =

  56. [61]

    , keywords =

    Evaluating quenching in cosmological simulations of galaxy formation with spectral covariance in the optical window. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf546 , archivePrefix =. 2411.08945 , primaryClass =

  57. [62]

    , keywords =

    Polarised emission from aligned dust grains in nearby galaxies: Predictions from the Auriga simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141333 , archivePrefix =. 2107.02180 , primaryClass =

  58. [63]

    , keywords =

    GalaxyGenius: Mock galaxy image generator for various telescopes from hydrodynamical simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554287 , archivePrefix =. 2506.15060 , primaryClass =

  59. [64]

    , keywords =

    Spinning nano-carbon grains: Viable origin for anomalous microwave emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142825 , archivePrefix =. 2205.01400 , primaryClass =

  60. [65]

    , keywords =

    The Astrodust+PAH Model: A Unified Description of the Extinction, Emission, and Polarization from Dust in the Diffuse Interstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c2 , archivePrefix =. 2208.12365 , primaryClass =

  61. [66]

    , keywords =

    THEMIS 2.0: A self-consistent model for dust extinction, emission, and polarisation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348391 , archivePrefix =. 2401.07739 , primaryClass =

  62. [69]

    , keywords =

    High-redshift metallicity calibrations for JWST spectra: insights from line emission in cosmological simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2745 , archivePrefix =. 2305.03753 , primaryClass =

  63. [70]

    , keywords =

    High-precision Photometric Redshifts from Spitzer/IRAC: Extreme [3.6] - [4.5] Colors Identify Galaxies in the Redshift Range z 6.6 - 6.9. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/122 , archivePrefix =. 1412.0663 , primaryClass =

  64. [71]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    21 Balmer Jump Street: The Nebular Continuum at High Redshift and Implications for the Bright Galaxy Problem, UV Continuum Slopes, and Early Stellar Populations. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.33232/001c.142570 , archivePrefix =. 2408.03189 , primaryClass =

  65. [72]

    Single star models from 0.1 to 316 M _

    BPASS stellar evolution models incorporating -enhanced composition - I. Single star models from 0.1 to 316 M _. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf178 , archivePrefix =. 2410.23167 , primaryClass =

  66. [73]

    , keywords =

    The link between the star formation history and [ /Fe ]. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01146.x , archivePrefix =. 1109.0005 , primaryClass =

  67. [74]

    , keywords =

    On the Variation in Stellar -enhancements of Star-forming Galaxies in the EAGLE Simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac350b , archivePrefix =. 2102.04561 , primaryClass =

  68. [75]

    , keywords =

    The binary model for type I supernovae - Theoretical rates. , keywords =

  69. [76]

    The Propagation of Uncertainties in Stellar Population Synthesis Modeling. III. Model Calibration, Comparison, and Evaluation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833 , archivePrefix =. 0911.3151 , primaryClass =

  70. [77]

    , keywords =

    Calibrated, cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with variable IMFs I: method and effect on global galaxy scaling relations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1826 , archivePrefix =. 1804.09079 , primaryClass =

  71. [78]

    , keywords =

    Understanding Galaxy Evolution Through Emission Lines. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 , archivePrefix =. 1910.09730 , primaryClass =

  72. [79]

    The Impact of Star Formation on the Interstellar Medium. I. The Excitation of Diffuse, Warm Ionized Gas in Dwarf Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/304978 , adsurl =

  73. [80]

    , keywords =

    Diffuse ionized gas and chemical abundances in IC 1727. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu722 , adsurl =

  74. [81]

    , keywords =

    A physical model of the broad-band continuum of AGN and its implications for the UV/X relation and optical variability. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1890 , archivePrefix =. 1804.00171 , primaryClass =

  75. [82]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    The SPHINX Public Data Release: Forward Modelling High-Redshift JWST Observations with Cosmological Radiation Hydrodynamics Simulations. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.21105/astro.2309.03269 , archivePrefix =. 2309.03269 , primaryClass =

  76. [83]

    , keywords =

    A unified multiwavelength model of galaxy formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1888 , archivePrefix =. 1509.08473 , primaryClass =

  77. [84]

    Astronomy and Computing , keywords =

    The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: Public release of halo and galaxy catalogues. Astronomy and Computing , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2016.02.004 , archivePrefix =. 1510.01320 , primaryClass =

  78. [85]

    , keywords =

    The cosmic spectral energy distribution in the EAGLE simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz302 , archivePrefix =. 1901.08878 , primaryClass =

  79. [87]

    , keywords =

    Two-size approximation: a simple way of treating the evolution of grain size distribution in galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2617 , archivePrefix =. 1412.3866 , primaryClass =

  80. [88]

    , keywords =

    SZ effects in the Magneticum Pathfinder simulation: comparison with the Planck, SPT, and ACT results. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2035 , archivePrefix =. 1509.05134 , primaryClass =

Showing first 80 references.