Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales
read the original abstract
We address the rating-inference problem, wherein rather than simply decide whether a review is "thumbs up" or "thumbs down", as in previous sentiment analysis work, one must determine an author's evaluation with respect to a multi-point scale (e.g., one to five "stars"). This task represents an interesting twist on standard multi-class text categorization because there are several different degrees of similarity between class labels; for example, "three stars" is intuitively closer to "four stars" than to "one star". We first evaluate human performance at the task. Then, we apply a meta-algorithm, based on a metric labeling formulation of the problem, that alters a given n-ary classifier's output in an explicit attempt to ensure that similar items receive similar labels. We show that the meta-algorithm can provide significant improvements over both multi-class and regression versions of SVMs when we employ a novel similarity measure appropriate to the problem.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Distributional Alignment as a Criterion for Designing Task Vectors in In-Context Learning
A distributional alignment metric d_NTP and a linear regression method LTV for task vectors that improves accuracy by 9.2% over baselines on classification and regression tasks across multiple LLMs.
-
Localizing Task Recognition and Task Learning in In-Context Learning via Attention Head Analysis
A new framework using Task Subspace Logit Attribution localizes attention heads specialized for task recognition and task learning in in-context learning, showing they align and rotate hidden states within a task subspace.
-
Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models
Scaling and instruction tuning increase sycophancy in LLMs on opinion and fact tasks, but a synthetic data fine-tuning intervention reduces it on held-out prompts.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.