REVIEW 7 cited by
Superbeams versus Neutrino Factories
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We compare the physics potential of planned superbeams with the one of neutrino factories. Therefore, the experimental setups as well as the most relevant uncertainties and errors are considered on the same footing as much as possible. We use an improved analysis including the full parameter correlations, as well as statistical, systematical, and degeneracy errors. Especially, degeneracies have so far not been taken into account in a numerical analysis. We furthermore include external input, such as improved knowledge of the solar oscillation parameters from the KamLAND experiment. This allows us to determine the limiting uncertainties in all cases. For a specific comparison, we choose two representatives of each class: For the superbeam, we take the first conceivable setup, namely the JHF to SuperKamiokande experiment, as well as, on a longer time scale, the JHF to HyperKamiokande experiment. For the neutrino factory, we choose an initially conceivable setup and an advanced machine. We determine the potential to measure the small mixing angle sin^2 2 theta_{13}, the sign of Delta m^2_{31}, and the leptonic CP phase $\deltacp$, which also implies that we compare the limitations of the different setups. We find interesting results, such as the complete loss of the sensitivity to the sign of Delta m^2_{31} due to degeneracies in many cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Quantum Information as a New Lens for Precision Neutrino Physics
Concurrence minima in neutrino oscillations identify low-entanglement energy regions that, when aligned with NOνA and T2K data, yield tighter joint constraints on sin²θ₂₃, δ_CP, and Δm²₃₁.
-
A Predictive Non-Holomorphic Modular $A_4$ Linear Seesaw Framework Testable at DUNE
A non-holomorphic modular A4 linear seesaw model with six singlet fermions and one flavon reproduces observed neutrino mixing and predicts absolute mass and 0νββ ranges that DUNE and other experiments can test.
-
Leptonic CP Phase Determination from Fisher Information in NO$\nu$A and T2K
T2K and NOνA extract only a small fraction of the quantum information about δ_CP, with extraction efficiency particularly suppressed near maximal CP violation.
-
Impact of different neutrino decoherence formalisms at the future long-baseline Experiments
Two bases for the neutrino decoherence matrix yield identical vacuum probabilities at small Gamma but diverge at large Gamma or with strong matter effects, altering chi-squared sensitivities at DUNE and P2SO.
-
Probing non-unitarity of the PMNS matrix in P2SO and comparison with DUNE
Projected GLoBES sensitivities show DUNE constrains the non-unitarity parameters α11 and |α21| better, while P2SO wins on α33 (and marginally α22); non-unitarity also distorts mass-hierarchy, octant, and CP-violation ...
-
Ultralight dark matter search in a large liquid scintillator detector
A JUNO-like detector could constrain the neutrino–ultralight-dark-matter oscillation-modulation parameters to ηΔ21 < 2.5×10^-2 and ηΔ31 < 5×10^-3 at 90% CL.
-
Dark Dimension Right-handed Neutrinos Confronted with Long-Baseline Oscillation Experiments
T2K and NOvA data exclude dark-dimension neutrino models with bulk mass |c| < ~0.1 eV for a 10 µm extra dimension.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.