pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: physics/0202021 · v1 · submitted 2002-02-07 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

Recognition: unknown

What is the Vortex Lattice Melting, Reality or Fiction?

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords phasevortexcoherencelatticelong-rangemeltingstateabrikosov
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This work fights against the widespread delusion cond-mat/0111052 on the vortex lattice melting. In spite of the outward appearances the Abrikosov state is not the vortex lattice with crystalline long-range order because pinning disorders destroy this order in real superconductors (A.I.Larkin, 1970) and the Abrikosov's solution 1957 year is not valid in the ideal case (K.Maki and H.Takayama, 1972). Only long-range order - long-range phase coherence exists in the Abrikosov state. Therefore the vortex lattice melting theories are science fiction cond-mat/9811051. The phase transition interpreted erroneously as the vortex lattice melting is in reality a disappearance of long-range phase coherence. In spite of the widespread opinion these two transitions are different transitions when a suitable definition of phase coherence is used. The superconducting state without phase coherence differs in essence from the mythical vortex liquid. The vortex, as a singularity in superconducting state with phase coherence, can not exist without phase coherence.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Meissner effect does not require radial charge flow

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The Meissner effect does not require radial charge flow because persistent surface currents follow from observed angular momentum quantization rather than Lorentz force on radial charges.