pith. sign in

arxiv: physics/0608255 · v2 · submitted 2006-08-25 · ⚛️ physics.data-an · cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.soc-ph

Maximizing Modularity is hard

classification ⚛️ physics.data-an cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.soc-ph
keywords algorithmsmodularitypartitionsbeencomputeactuallyalgorithmcalled
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Several algorithms have been proposed to compute partitions of networks into communities that score high on a graph clustering index called modularity. While publications on these algorithms typically contain experimental evaluations to emphasize the plausibility of results, none of these algorithms has been shown to actually compute optimal partitions. We here settle the unknown complexity status of modularity maximization by showing that the corresponding decision version is NP-complete in the strong sense. As a consequence, any efficient, i.e. polynomial-time, algorithm is only heuristic and yields suboptimal partitions on many instances.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Flexible Online Representation Learning Based on Similarity Matching

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes a versatile online biologically plausible algorithm for learning sparse shift-invariant representations usable for clustering, manifold tiling, or sparse coding depending on data structure.