Tabular foundation models excel on tiny- to medium-sized IID data but are outperformed by traditional tree-based and deep learning models on non-IID, large, and high-dimensional datasets, based on evaluations across 11 models and 142 datasets in the new BeyondArena benchmark.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
FlexiFlow optimizes carbon footprint for item-level intelligence on flexible electronics by modeling lifetime variation, delivering 1.62X microarchitectural and 14.5X algorithmic reductions plus a 30.9 kHz tape-out.
Genetic algorithms outperform gradient descent when training DEBI-NN on synthetic and small medical datasets (n=85 to 2126), achieving accuracies of 100% vs 83%, 83% vs 78%, 80% vs 67%, and 81% vs 66%.
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond IID: How General Are Tabular Foundation Models, Really?
Tabular foundation models excel on tiny- to medium-sized IID data but are outperformed by traditional tree-based and deep learning models on non-IID, large, and high-dimensional datasets, based on evaluations across 11 models and 142 datasets in the new BeyondArena benchmark.