pith. sign in

Advancing Mathematics Research with AI-Driven Formal Proof Search

4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

4 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly excel at mathematical reasoning, but their unreliability limits their utility in mathematics research. A mitigation is using LLMs to generate formal proofs in languages like Lean. We perform the first large-scale evaluation of this method's ability to solve open problems. Our most capable agent autonomously resolved 9 of 353 open Erd\H{o}s problems at the per-problem cost of a few hundred dollars, proved 44/492 OEIS conjectures, and is being deployed in combinatorics, optimization, graph theory, algebraic geometry, and quantum optics research. A basic agent alternating LLM-based generation with Lean-based verification replicated the Erd\H{o}s successes but proved costlier on the hardest problems. These findings demonstrate the power of AI-aided formal proof search and shed light on the agent designs that enable it.

years

2026 4

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 4

clear filters

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers after filters.