RLCM trains LLMs with a margin-enhanced process reward that widens the gap between correct and incorrect reasoning steps, improving calibration on math, code, logic, and science tasks without hurting accuracy.
Enhancing reasoning through process supervision with monte carlo tree search, 2025 a
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.LG 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
RaR uses aggregated rubric feedback as rewards in on-policy RL, delivering up to 31% relative gains on HealthBench and 7% on GPQA-Diamond versus direct Likert LLM-as-judge baselines.
A co-evolving proposer-critic RL framework improves GUI grounding accuracy by letting the model critique its own proposals rendered on screenshots.
citing papers explorer
-
Process Supervision of Confidence Margin for Calibrated LLM Reasoning
RLCM trains LLMs with a margin-enhanced process reward that widens the gap between correct and incorrect reasoning steps, improving calibration on math, code, logic, and science tasks without hurting accuracy.
-
Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains
RaR uses aggregated rubric feedback as rewards in on-policy RL, delivering up to 31% relative gains on HealthBench and 7% on GPQA-Diamond versus direct Likert LLM-as-judge baselines.
-
Measure Twice, Click Once: Co-evolving Proposer and Visual Critic via Reinforcement Learning for GUI Grounding
A co-evolving proposer-critic RL framework improves GUI grounding accuracy by letting the model critique its own proposals rendered on screenshots.