Kernel density estimation improves radio source count estimation over binned methods, as shown in simulations and LOFAR data analysis, with a new AstroKDE package.
, year = 1974, month = mar, volume = 188, pages =
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4representative citing papers
The authors produce a new all-sky Galactic emission model with synchrotron amplitude at 4.76 GHz roughly twice the Planck 2015 value, derived via Commander fitting to recent radio and microwave surveys.
Simulations show SPHEREx photometry is generally unbiased but source blending drives outliers; with brightness selection, photometric redshifts reach σ_NMAD ≈ 0.003-0.01 and cluster redshifts are recovered to |Δz|/(1+z) < 0.002 at z ≲ 0.5.
Comparison of Galactic magnetic field models to polarized synchrotron observations shows good agreement on angles but poor match on intensity, indicating local foreground structures must be incorporated.
citing papers explorer
-
Improving Radio Source Count Estimation Using Kernel Density Estimation
Kernel density estimation improves radio source count estimation over binned methods, as shown in simulations and LOFAR data analysis, with a new AstroKDE package.
-
All-sky modeling of Galactic emission at radio and microwave frequencies
The authors produce a new all-sky Galactic emission model with synchrotron amplitude at 4.76 GHz roughly twice the Planck 2015 value, derived via Commander fitting to recent radio and microwave surveys.
-
The SPHEREx View of Galaxy Clusters: A Simulation-based Validation of the Forced Photometry Pipeline for Extended Sources
Simulations show SPHEREx photometry is generally unbiased but source blending drives outliers; with brightness selection, photometric redshifts reach σ_NMAD ≈ 0.003-0.01 and cluster redshifts are recovered to |Δz|/(1+z) < 0.002 at z ≲ 0.5.
-
A comparison between Galactic magnetic field models and polarized synchrotron emission with C-BASS at 4.76 GHz and S-PASS at 2.3 GHz
Comparison of Galactic magnetic field models to polarized synchrotron observations shows good agreement on angles but poor match on intensity, indicating local foreground structures must be incorporated.