EquiMem calibrates shared memory in multi-agent debate by computing a game-theoretic equilibrium from agent queries and paths, outperforming heuristics and LLM validators across benchmarks while remaining robust to adversarial agents.
Title resolution pending
5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 5representative citing papers
CAGE uses common-agency games and an EPEC algorithm to compute equilibrium policies that balance multiple conflicting objectives for test-time LLM alignment.
LLMs show systematic output-mode collapse on closed-form prompts, with only ~22% of semantically equivalent variants preserving the requested bare-label format across five models and four tasks.
A framework with U-statistics and kernel-based metrics quantifies AI agent consistency and robustness, showing trajectory metrics outperform pass@1 rates in diagnosing failures.
LLMs show improved accuracy on gastroenterology questions but remain overconfident in self-reported certainty across commercial, open-source, and quantized variants.
citing papers explorer
-
EquiMem: Calibrating Shared Memory in Multi-Agent Debate via Game-Theoretic Equilibrium
EquiMem calibrates shared memory in multi-agent debate by computing a game-theoretic equilibrium from agent queries and paths, outperforming heuristics and LLM validators across benchmarks while remaining robust to adversarial agents.
-
Common-agency Games for Multi-Objective Test-Time Alignment
CAGE uses common-agency games and an EPEC algorithm to compute equilibrium policies that balance multiple conflicting objectives for test-time LLM alignment.
-
Paraphrase-Induced Output-Mode Collapse: When LLMs Break Character Under Semantically Equivalent Inputs
LLMs show systematic output-mode collapse on closed-form prompts, with only ~22% of semantically equivalent variants preserving the requested bare-label format across five models and four tasks.
-
Consistency as a Testable Property: Statistical Methods to Evaluate AI Agent Reliability
A framework with U-statistics and kernel-based metrics quantifies AI agent consistency and robustness, showing trajectory metrics outperform pass@1 rates in diagnosing failures.
-
Self-Reported Confidence of Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Analysis of Commercial, Open-Source, and Quantized Models
LLMs show improved accuracy on gastroenterology questions but remain overconfident in self-reported certainty across commercial, open-source, and quantized variants.